incoldblood
DESCRIPTION
for class, backgroundTRANSCRIPT
Mayor Works
Other Voices, Other Rooms, 1948
Breakfast at Tiffany’s, 1958
In Cold Blood, 1966 (made into a film in 1967
“This book was an important event for me. While writing it, I realized I just might have found a solution to what had always been my greatest creative quandary. I wanted to produce a journalistic novel, something on a large scale that would have the credibility of fact, the immediacy of film, the depth and freedom of prose, and the precision of poetry.”
Answered Prayers, unfinished (excerpted in Vanity Fair in 1975)
Published about 13 works in total, mostly short volumes of novellas, short stories
Died in 1984, age 59
Why did you select this particular subject matter of murder; had you previously been interested in crime?
Not really, no. During the last years I've learned a good deal about crime, and the origins of the homicidal mentality. Still, it is a layman's knowledge and I don't pretend to anything deeper. The motivating factor in my choice of material--that is, choosing to write a true account of an actual murder case--was altogether literary. The decision was based on a theory I've harbored since I first began to write professionally, which is well over 20 years ago. It seemed to me that journalism, reportage, could be forced to yield a serious new art form: the "nonfiction novel," as I thought of it. Several admirable reporters--Rebecca West for one, and Joseph Mitchell and Lillian Ross--have shown the possibilities of narrative reportage; and Miss Ross, in her brilliant "Picture," achieved at least a nonfiction novella. Still, on the whole, journalism is the most underestimated, the least explored of literary mediums.
Interview with George Plimpton, Jan. 16, 1966
“Of course a properly done piece of narrative reporting requires imagination!--and a good deal of special technical equipment that is usually beyond the resources--and I don't doubt the interests-- of most fictional writers: an ability to transcribe verbatim long conversations, and to do so without taking notes or using tape-recordings. Also, it is necessary to have a 20/20 eye for visual detail--in this sense, it is quite true that one must be a "literary photographer," though an exceedingly selective one. But, above all, the reporter must be able to empathize with personalities outside his usual imaginative range, mentalities unlike his own, kinds of people he would never have written about had he not been forced to by encountering them inside the journalistic situation. This last is what first attracted me to the notion of narrative reportage.”
—Plimpton, ibid
In Cold Blood originally published in four parts in The New Yorker, 1965
Had formulated the idea of a nonfiction
“novel”
Saw an article in The New York Times that
grabbed his attention.
I’m pretty sure it was this one.
Most anyone who types today owes something to Capote. A novelist who developed a passing interest in real events, he transformed the hackwork of journalism into something far more literary and substantial. —David Carr, New York Times
This is a piece that reviews two films about Capote, but also points out the way in which Capote was a pioneer for certain types of literary journalism, such as Joe McGinnis’ Fatal Vision.
Capote was a master publicist, and spent quite a lot of time discussing his new genre, his technique. He claimed to train himself to have perfect recall with interviews and not even need to take notes.
Unsurprisingly, almost from the start, some people pointed out possible errors, even fabrication. Capote did, notably, acknowledge one scene that wasn’t true right before he died (Slate Magazine, 2013)
The Slate article also delves into how this even happened, given that The New Yorker was a pioneer in contemporary fact-checking
The shoe really dropped
In 2013, “new evidence undermines Mr.
Capote's claim that his best seller was an
"immaculately factual" recounting of the
bloody slaughter of the Clutter family in their
Kansas farmhouse. It also calls into question
the image of Mr. Dewey as the brilliant,
haunted hero.” —Wall Street Journal
Kansas Bureau of Investigation documents from the investigation into the deaths suggests that the events described in two crucial chapters of the 1966 book differ significantly from what actually happened. Separately, a contract reviewed and authenticated by The Wall Street Journal shows that Mr. Capote in 1965 required Columbia Pictures to offer Mr. Dewey's wife a job as a consultant to the film version of his book for a fee far greater than the U.S. median family” —WSJ, ibid
“...at a key moment in the 1959 investigation,
when 19 days of utter bafflement ended with
an informant stepping forward and naming
the killers, the KBI didn't snap to action,
according to the new documents. It didn't, as
Mr. Capote's book says, dispatch an agent
that very night to the Kansas farmhouse
where one of the suspects had been living
with his parents.Instead, the KBI waited five
days to visit that farmhouse, according to the
KBI documents...” WSJ, ibid
The New Yorker on the issue of veracity.
Salon.com with a round-up of other reporting
on the 2013 revelations
Although Capote is often noted as a stylist,
this New Republic article is an interesting
critique of In Cold Blood’s writing.
Many supporters of Capote say that many of
the contemporary rules regarding nonfiction
were created because of this book:
Fact-checking, sourcing, footnotes
But it also raises many of the same
questions we encountered in The Journalist
and the Murderer
Relationships between writer and source and
how it impacts the writer
The relationship between narrative technique
and factual reporting
And it’s a question that still plagues the
entire genre of nonfiction, particularly
memoir. (NPR, 2012)
Bring your own questions, think about these:
The relationship between sources and reporters
The importance of fact-checking; Is John D’agata right to distinguish fact from art?
Capote’s belief that a murder would have long-lasting literary merits
The writing itself, stylistically
How does it impact your reading to learn that much of what Capote wrote was contested?
Why (or why not) do you think having 100 percent accuracy is important for journalism?
Are you willing to cut more slack if the writing is a nonfiction “novel” as Capote says?
Is there any way in which using techniques that typically belong to other genres might impact content?
Honest mistakes are different than
fabrication
Fabrication, if you’re a journalist, will end
your career.
And there have been some pretty fascinating
high profile examples. My favorite, because
it’s truly crazy, is Stephen Glass, a former
New Republic writer, whose work is the basis
of the movie Shattered Glass.