in die hooggeregshof van svlp-afrika v e afdtxing)...— mrs phosisi, yes. very'briefly i would...
TRANSCRIPT
IN DIE HOOGGEREGSHOF VAN sVlP-AFRIKA
(TRftKSVAALSE PROVINSIALE AFDtXING)
VSAAKNOMMER: CC *S2/65 PRETORIA
1988-01-25
DIE STAAT teen: PATRICK MABUYA BALEKA EN 21
ANDER
VOOR: SY EDELE REGTER VAN DIJKHQRST EN
ASSESSOR : MNR. V.F. KRUGEL
NAMENS DIE STAAT:
NAMENS DIE VERDEDIGING
TOLK:
KLAGTE:
ADV.ADV.
ADV.
ADV.
ADV.
ADV.
ADV.
ADV.
MNR.
PP
V
A
G
K
Z
G
B
,B. JACOBS
. FICK
. HANEKOM
. CHASKALSOS
. BIZOS
. TIP
.M. YACOOB
.J. MARCUS
.S.N. SKOSANA
(SIEN AKTE VAN BESKULDIGING)
PLEIT: AL DIE BESKULDIGDES: ONSKULDIG
KONTRAKTEURS: LUBBE OPNAMES
VOLUME 331
( B l a d s y e IS 895 - 18 929 )
K1080.00 - 18 895 - MBATYA2WA
COURT RESUMES ON 25 JANUARY 1988.
MR BIZOS : All the accused are before Your Lordship this
morning. The next witness is Victor Matabane Mbatyazwa.
He will speak in Xhosa.
VICTOR MATABANE MBATYAZWA, d.s.s. (Through interpreter)
EXAMINATION BY MR BIZQS : Mr Mbatyazwa, are you 49 years of
age and do you reside at 1527 Sharpeville in the Vaal Triangle?
— Yes.
And are you employed as a machine operator by Apex In-
dustries? — Yes. (10)
In Vereeniging? — Yes.
For how long have you been employed by this company? —
21 Years.
Is that since 1966? — 1966.
During 1984 how much were you earning? — R2,46 per hour.
Did that come to approximately R140,00 per week? -- That
is correct.
You are married and you have four children? — Yes.
Are all your children still young and still dependent
on you? — That is so. (20)
Since 1982, have you been a member of any trade union?
— I joined in 1982.
Which union did you join? — Metal and Allied Workers
Union.
Is that shortly known as MAWU? — MAWU, yes.
And since 1985 whilst still employed by Apex Industries,
have you assumed any office in the trade union at your work?
— Yes, as a shopsteward.
Do you know whether your trade union was ever affiliated
to the United Democratic Front, the UDF? — No. (30)
Do/...
K1080.01 - 18 896 - MBATYAZWA
Do you know or do you know that it was not affiliated?
— It was not affiliated.
Since 1982 were you a-keen trade union member and did
you participate in its activities? — Very much so.
COURT : Just for my own interest sake. A shop steward with
a certain employer or are there a number of them? -- It
depends on the number of employees by that particular
firm as to whether it justifies one shop steward or more.
How many employees does one shop steward serve? — If
the employees are fifteen or plus, then you have two shop(lO)
stewards, not one. Depending on departments as well.
MR BIZOS : Is there a tendency that if there is a separate
department in the work, there is a shop steward for each
department? — Yes.
How many shop stewards are you at Apex? — We are two.
And the total number of employees of Apex? — It is three
hundred plus. Well, Apex I will say is not yet properly
organised.
Did you or do you have your own house in Sharpeville? —
No, I do not have one. (20)
To this day? — Until now.
Is that because you were not interested in having your
own house? — I tried and failed.
Where are you living in Sharpeville? You have given us
the address, but what sort of premises do you live in? — I
have put up a structure of my own on the church premises.
Is that where you were living in 1983/84? — No.
Where were you living then? — S1527 was my address.
What sort of structure were you living in in 1984? —
Even then I had put up a structure of a sort of a shelter(30)
in/...
K1080.07 - 18 897 - MBATYAZWA
in which I lived on somebody's premises.
And were you paying rent for putting up that shelter? -~
Yes, R25,00 per month.
COURT : Why did you move to the church premises? — The yard
on which I lived where I had this shelter structure put was
snail and I had children. I needed a bigger space. I did
not have enough space on which to extend my shelter to
accommodate everybody of my family.
MR BIZOS : Did you try to get a house? — Yes, I tried.
Since the year 1979 up to date I have been trying. (10)
Why did you fail to get a house? — I was first told,
that is the first reason, that there were no houses available
to be allocated to me as an applicant and then I questioned
this thing by saying other people do get houses. I was then
told look, there are two ways which can be used for you to
get a house allocated in your name. Number one, you must
pay a bribe, which bribe would not be less than R100,00.
Or alternatively, there are people who are in arrears with
their rent payments, who are being evicted from the houses.
For me to be allocated that house, I shall have to be pre-(20)
pared to pay the arrears, which could amount to as much as
R300,00. In that way then I would be allocated a house.
You are saying you were told this. Was this told
to you in secret or how did you come to know that this was
the way in which you had to get a house in Sharpeville? --
I got to know about this through discussions with residents
in the township, because I also wanted to have a property of
my own which I rent. In discussing this they would then
tell me what to do.
Do you recall that there were elections to the council(30)
for/...
K1080.09 - 18 896 - MBATYAZWA
for the Town Council of Lekoa in 1983? — Yes, I recall that.
Did you vote in that election? — Yes.
Did you have any objection in participating in that
election? — No, I did not.
You have already told us that you were an active member
of your union at the time. Did your union take part in any
campaign to get people not to vote in that election? — No,
it did not.
Other than your union and your church, were you a member
of any other organisation in 1983/84 or 1985 for that (10)
matter? — No.
I want to take you to the beginning of August 1984.
Did you hear anything about a proposed rent increase? — No.
Did you hear of any councillors' meeting in the beginning
of August? — No.
Did you go to any meeting at which the councillors were
present and spoke to the people in August 1984? — Yes, on
5 August.
How did you come to go to that meeting? — During those
days, that is the days just before this day of the meeting, (20)
I came to know in hearing from people in the area that there
was going to be a councillors1 meeting, namely a meeting
which was being convened by the councillors.
COURT : Where was it held? — In the old hall in Sharpeville.
MR BI2OS : Did you go to that meeting? — I went to this
meeting, yes.
Why? — I went there to go and hear personally what
was said by the councillors in relation to the increase of
the rent.
How would the increase of the rent have affected you (30)
at/...
K1080.ll - 18 899 - MBATYAZWA
at that time? — It affected me because besides the money I
paid for having my shelter structure on the premises of this
person, I was compelled to pay an amount of RIO,00 from the
first month of the year, that would mean for the whole year.
Then I was expected to pay a total amount of R120,00.
COURT : For what? — Lodger's permit.
Was that going up? — It was going to be increased to us
as well.
With how much? Did you know? What was said was that
the R5,90 was going to be an increase to us as well. (10)
MR BIZOS : The person that allowed you to put up the
structure on your stand, was he or she a person who was well
off? — It was a poor person just like myself.
Was there any discussion between the occupier of the
stand or the owner of the stand and you as .to who would have
to bear the R5f90 increase if it came about?
COURT : The R5,90 increase of himself or of the owner?
MR 3IZ0S : Of the owner. We will call him the owner. — No.
When you got to the meeting, were there councillors
there? — Yes. (20)
Do you remember who they were? — Yes, I do.
Who were they? — Dlamini, Mokate, Sekobane, Mofokeng,
Kolising, Ma Phosisi.
Is that Mrs Phosisi? — Mrs Phosisi, yes.
Very'briefly I would like you to please tell His Lordship
what happened at this meeting as far as you remember it? --
On my arrival at this meeting I was accompanied by a semi-
paralysed old man, namely Paul Nhlapo. It was after O8hOO
but before 09h00 when we arrived there. The meeting was
already proceeding at our arrival. The speaker at the (30)
time/...
K1080.17 - 18 900 - MBATYAZWA
time of our arrival was councillor Sekobane. He was addres-
sing that meeting in this way.
COURT : Are we going to have the full contents of each
speech?
MR BI2OS : I was hoping to do it briefly. I will try and
guide the witness in order to have it as brief as possible.
Tell us, what did Mr Sekobane say? — What he said was that
the rent was going to be increased with the effect from
1 September 1984, which increase is being resulted by the
project of building a new clinic, the tarring of streets (10)
and other things he mentioned that I cannot remember now.
From what he was saying, I inferred that what he was saying
here was a confirmation of a speech by somebody prior to
him addressing this meeting.
Did your companion Mr Paul Nhlapo, the semi-paralysed
man, ask any questions? -- Yes, he was the first person to
get up after Sekobane finished and took a seat there.
What did he ask? — What he said was the following.
We recently elected these councillors who made the following
promises. That they were going to look in the interest (20)
and the conditions under which the people are living and
without increasing the rent and further said "Now, today we
are here at a meeting convened by the councillors to come
and tell us that they have already increased the rent." He
further said "People like ourselves who are suffering so
much, where do we get that money from?" That is the money
meant for the increase. And further said that the councillors
have turned against the people whom they, the councillors,
were canvassing, that these people must elect them into the
council, by not keeping to their promises. (30)
What/...
K1080.20 - 18 901 - MBATYAZWA
What I want to ask you is this. Mr Nhlapo, is he an
elderly gentleman? — Quite old.
What would you say to some evidence that was led before
His Lordship that at this meeting only young people had
objections to the increase of the rent? -- That is a lie.
A confusing lie. In ir.y judgment of the people present at
this meeting, I would say the following. Only grown-up
people were there and those who were younger than the people
I would have called grown-up people were of the age that one
could have said that they are people who are already (10)
responsible for the payment of rent.
Do you know Miss Nozipho Myeza? — Quite well.
Did she also said? — Yes.
I would not ask you what she said. Others may ask you.
Was she the only other person that spoke or did other people
speak, as well about the raising of the rent? — Quite a lot
of people had something to say there because they were not
pleased.
Did any councillor respond to these criticisms of the
councillors? — Yes. (20)
Which councillor? — Councillor Sekobane is the first
person.
What was his response? — His response to this was that
we are not the people who increased the rent. The Municipality
is the body that increased the rent. After that councillor
Kolisang then got up and said "Look,, people, let us tell these
people (with reference to the audience) the truth. It is
not the Administration Board who decided to increase the
rent and in fact effected it, but we, the councillors, are
the people who increased it" and therefore said "We have (30)
been/...
K1080.22 - 18 902 - MBATYAZWA
been given the powers to do that. Let us tell them the truth
so that they know what the truth is. Even if they swear at
us, they should be swearing at us knowing the truth." At
the end he said "Praise the Lord."
Did any other councillor speak? — Yes, councillor *
Dlamini got up. He in his address stressed that the rent
is going to increase from 1 September. Ke further said that
we, the councillors have the powers to arrest and have the
powers to release and said the following further that in
actual fact the rent was supposed to have been increased(10)
by the amount of R50,00, but because of us who disagreed
with that kind of increase, we agreed and \fixed it at R5,90.
Councillor Sekobane got up again and said the following
that our fathers, meaning we, the parents, and our children,
meaning our sons, are wasting money in the beer gardens
and there is therefore no reason to object to the increase.
Those were the councillors who had something to say.
Did anybody, I do not want to know about everybody who
responded to this, but did a woman respond to these remarks
of the councillors? — Yes, Mrs. Motaung responded to (20)
that.
Did she ask anything? — Yes, she asked a question which
was directed to councillor Mokate.
What was her question? — Her question was about her
being evicted from her house and she had complained about
it and reported that incident for quite some time and there
was nothing that was being done about it.
What happened then? — In his answer to that, that is
councillor Mokate, he did not answer directly to the question
which was being asked direct to that by this woman, but (30)
he/...
K1080.29 - 18 903 - MBATYAZWA
he made a statement which statement had a bearing to everybody,
that is the community as a whole in reference to the audience
there, as a result of which there was some shouts from the
audience shouting him, Mokate, down.
What happened then? — There was then an exchange of
words in response to one another's statements between Mokate
and Mrs Motaung, as a result of which the people then got up
and left. When the people got up to leave the meeting,
Mrs Motaung went up towards councillor Mokate. Just before
she reached him, as she was going for him, councillor (10)
Kolisang got inbetween the two which a view of stopping
Mrs Motaung from reaching Mokate. As a result of which
Mrs Mokate then slapped councillor Kolisang in the face.
Other than this incident, was there any violence or
threat of violence at this meeting? — When I got outside
the hail as people were now leaving the meeting, I found
that councillor Dlamini has drawn a gun aiming at somebody.
Then another person got inbetween them. What the cause was,
I do not know.
What would you say to the evidence of the state wit-(20)
nesses was a completely orderly meeting at which there were
no real objections to the increase of the rent, is that
true or not? — They are telling a blue lie.
COURT : Are there shades of lies? Is a red lie stronger
than a blue lie? — It is a double double strong insentive
lie.
MR SIZOS : I have read in a record of a perfumed lie, which
was explained to me on the basis that you could smell it a
mile off. There is also evidence that the meeting finished
up in an orderly fashion and Mr Dlamini quietly advised (30)
people/...
K1080-31 - 18 904 - MBATYAZWA
people that if they had any objections, they were to draw up
petitions and hand them over to their wards? — That is still
a lie because in the first place this meeting did not close
proper. It was just disrupted and people decided to leave
as a result of the incident between councillor Mokate and
Mrs Motaung. How could he, Dlamini, then have done that.
My Lord, it may be of some assistance to Your Lordship
and t-"ie learned assessor and possibly to my learned friends
if I give Your Lordship the pages. It is Mofokeng page
2 532, 2 534, 2 535 and 2 541 to 2 548 and Mrs Phosisi (10)
at paces 2 763 to 2 787 that these incidents are described
in the state case.
Did you - will you please have a look at AN15.5. Did
you see that pamphlet? — Yes.
Did you see it in August 1984? — Yes.
Advertising the meeting at the Anglican Church Sharpe-
ville to be held on 12 August 1984 at 14h00? — Yes.
I want to ask you this. You told us that you were an
active member of your union. First of all, MAWU was that
a strong union in the Vaal Triangle during 1984? — In the (20)
Republic, not only in the Vaal. It was a strong union in
the Republic of South Africa.
And I want to ask you this ... (Court intervenes)
COURT : How many members in the Vaal? — I cannot even tell
what the number is.
MR 5IZ0S : The Vaal is primarily a metal working area? —
Yes.
If need be, My Lord, evidence will be led that it was
I think the first registered union under the new dispensation.
Tell me, did your union have anything to do with the calling(30)
of/...
K1080.35 - 18 905 - MBATYAZWA
of this meeting?
COURT : Why do you say that with an inflected voice, Mr Bizos?
Why do you not merely ask him "Did your union have anything
to do with the calling of the meeting?" The way you put it
one can sort of without much imagination get an inflection
which would lead you to a certain answer. The answer being
no.
MR 3IZ0S : One cannot forget - Your Lordship is quite
correct, I tried to avoid it, but one cannot forget - sub-
consciously one cannot stop being an advocate. That is (10)
all I can say.
COURT : It makes no difference on paper in any event and
be the time I read it again I will have forgotten your
inflection. All the advocacy is lost.
MR BIZOS : I will try. Did your union have anything to
do with the calling of this meeting? — It had nothing to
do with that.
Do you know whether any other union in the Vaal had
anything to do with the calling of this meeting? — What
I know is that the meeting in Sharpeville was meant for (20)
the residents of Sharpeville and was called by them therefore.
No other person or body had any part to play in convening
that meeting, as far as I know.
COURT : To which church do you belong? — Church of Christ.
And where is your church building? - We do not have a
church building.
3ut now on which church premises do you live? — Bantu
Reformed Church is the building.
MR 3IZ0S : Did you go to the meeting of 12 August 1984? —
Yes, I did. (30)
Were/.. .
K1080.39 - 18 906 - MBATYA2WA
Were you there from the beginning of the meeting? —
Just at the time of my arrival the meeting begun, again in
the company of the old man Nhlapo.
When you got there, who appeared to be in charge of the
meeting? — I could not identify a person in control of the
meeting, because it was meant for the residents of Sharpe-
ville.
COURT : Was this a meeting without a chairman? -- I find
it difficult to say whether there was a chairman or not,
because we as residents had gone there to discuss the whole(10)
thing as residents. We did not have somebody whom we had
chosen as a chairman who will chair the meeting. That is
what makes it difficult for me to say who the chairman was.
MR 3IZ0S : Who started the meeting? — Reverend Moselane.
Is that accused no. 3 before His Lordship? — Yes.
Did he explain the purpose of the meeting? — Yes.
What did he say about it? — What he said was that for
this meeting to be held in this church building, it was as
a result of the request by the residents and the members of .
his congregation that they come and meet there in order to (20)
come together and discuss this incident which is not a
pleasing one about the increase of the rent. He also added
to say that it is of course not pleasing, referring to the
question of the rent, especially when one has to consider
that in respect of the pensioners and in addition to that,
the majority of his congregation are pensioners. He there-
fore said that it was important to come together and discuss
this issue, because there are many ways which one can follow
to indicate your disapproval of this question pertaining to
the rent, namely the completion of a petition and finding (30)
out/...
K1080.41 - 18 907 - MBATYAZWA
out whether this is lawful. He further added that although
he himself does not have a good idea of the things he had
just mentioned, this can be done, that is going to the lawyers
to find some solutions as to what procedure to follow and
that after completing the petition, this shall have to be
sent to the councillors before 1 September.
Did anyone else speak that you can recall? — Yes, quite
a number of people added their views. We were there in fact
to find a solution.
I do not want you to mention the speakers or what they (10)
said. Was everyone happy about this fact that there was
going to be an increase in this rent? — From those present
there with me not a single one was pleased abotat the increase
on rent.
Were any decisions made at this meeting? — Yes.
Do you remember what decisions were made? — That the
increase of R5,90 was not being accepted by the community.
Therefore the resolution was that this is not going to be"
paid. The second resolution was that because of the
councillors having done all this without taking into conside-(20)
ration the burden that it was going to create on the community
and that they have decided on this, without having considered
the community as a whole in general, they are therefore
being asked to resign. Those were the resolutions of the
meeting of the 12th.
Was anything going to be done about the question that
had been mentioned of the petition and of the legality or
otherwise? — Yes, something was to be done about that.
By whom? — After having discussed everything and
settled whatever we could settle there and then, we were (30)
going/...
K1080.48 - 18 908 - MBATYA2WA
going to decide as to who the person is who was going to take
that up.
COURT : Well, did you? — No, we did not, the reason being
that we had not come to a conclusion about the petition as
to what exactly was to happen what was to be done with
reference to the petition. We therefore did not have some-
body whom we elected to take that issue up.
MR BIZOS : Was anybody going to try and find out what had
to be done? — Yes, Reverend Moselane who raised that was
the person to go for that. (10)
Was there any talk of any violence against any council-
lors personally or their property at this meeting? — No.
Was there going to be another meeting? — Yes, an
announcement was made after this meeting that there was going
to be another meeting on the 19th.
COURT : Was the announcement made at this meeting or later?
— At this meeting, that another meeting was going to be held
at the same venue on the 19th.
MR BIZOS : At this meeting of the 12th, who gave the people
a chance to speak, so to speak? Who was in control of (20)
the meeting? — Nobody was in fact giving chances to people
who is now going to speak next. What happened was that a
person would speak. Immediately that person finishes, the
next one who feels like it, would just get up and say what-
ever he or she wished to say at this meeting.
Was anyone on the platform of this church? — Because
of the way in which this meeting place was full, it was
difficult for one to differentiate whether there was a plat-
form or not or to say to someone you are on the platform
there. (30)
Were/...
K1080.51 - 18 909 - MBATYAZWA
Were there a lot of people in front so to speak? — Yes.
And was a riotous meeting or did it finish up quietly?
— It was a peaceful and well-behaved meeting. To me it was
quite clear that everybody present there wanted to hear
exactly what was being said to be able to relate to whoever
about what he heard in this meeting.
Did you go to the meeting of 19 August 1984? — Yes.
Did you go alone? — Still in the company of the old
man Nhlapo.
What - did you get there at the time of the start of (10)
the meeting or had it started before you got there? — When
the meeting began I was already there.
Were there more or less people there on the 19th than
had been the previous week? — This day there were so many
people that they in fact did not all get into the meeting
hall. Some of them were standing outside.
How did that meeting start, the meeting of the 19th?
— It was opened by Reverend Moselane with a hymn Reya boka
Morena, He read from the Bible and preached what he read
in the Bible. After which then there was a prayer. After (20)
which prayer then he explained the purpose of the meeting
which was held there. To say that this meeting precedes
the meeting of the 12th. There was a person there acting as
a chairman. That person's name is not known to me.
Had you seen him before? Did you know anything about
him? — I knew nothing about this person. I only became
aware of the presence of that person there at the time when
this person started speaking.
Can you recall what he said?— Yes, this person reminded
us who were there at this meeting about the resolutions (30)
of/...
K1080.57 - 18 910 - MSATYAZWA
of the previous meeting which was held on the 12th, saying
that there were two resolutions at the previous meeting,
being that there is going to be payment on rent with the
exclusion of the R5,90 increase and that there was going to
be a request to the councillors to resign. These he men-
tioned as resolutions of the meeting of the 12th at this
meeting.
Kow did the audience react at the meeting of the 19th
when these two resolutions were mentioned by the person who
was the chairman of the meeting? — And was accepted and (10)
confirmed by this meeting. Those that were present in the
previous meeting said yes, the resolutions are correct.
COURT ADJOURNS. COURT RESUMES.
VICTOR MATABANE MBATYA2WA, still under oath
FURTHER EXAMINATION BY MR BIZOS : We were dealing with the
meeting of the 19th. You told us how it started and what
was said at the beginning. Did any people speak from the
stage on this occasion? — The manner in which that place
was full, one could not say there was a place to which one
could refer as a stage, but of the people in front there, (20)
Reverend Moselane spoke and the other person who was assis-
ting him also from the front is the next person who spoke
from there.
COURT : Who was that? — I do not know this person, but
that is the person who was explaining about the meeting which
was held on the 12th.
Is that the chairman? — That is the onet I said I could
refer to as a chairman.
MR BIZOS : And after him, what happened? — There was then
a suggestion which was made that we do not buy from the (30)
councillors'/..-
K1080.61 - 18 911 - MBATYAZWA
councillors' shops. In so doing that does not mean that we
are fighting them as persons, individuals. That is just to
make them feel the pain in order to gain them to our side.
That was a suggestion which was made on the 19th.
Can you recall who made that suggestion? — Yes, I can.
Who made that suggestion? -- Oupa Klomoka made the
suggestion.
COURT : Have we heard that name before?
MR BIZOS : Is that accused no. 2 sitting in front there? —
Yes. (10)
Did you know him before? — I saw him for the first time
on the 19th and that was the last time I saw him.
Can you recall whether anything was said as to whether
he belonged to any organisation or not? — Yes.
What was said? — It was said he is a member of AZAPO.
Can you recall who else spoke at this meeting? — Yes,
then we were told about Mr Tom Manthata by Reverend Moselane,
who was saying he, Tom, is a guest -speaker amongst us.
Do you see - did he speak, Mr Tom Manthata? — Yes, he
did speak at this meeting, although I am not going to be (20)
able to remember his speech in details or broad details.
Do you see Mr Tom Manthata here? — He looks like that
man.
Which man? — The one standing.
Accused no. 16. You say you would not be able to say
precisely what he said, but I want to ask you this. Did he
say that councillors must be killed? — No, he did not say
that. I would have remembered that.
Did he say that councillors' properties must be destroyed?
— Kc, he did not say that. (30)
Well/...
K1080.68 - 18 912 - MBATYAZWA
Well,, can you tell us what you remember him saying?
— Yes. I remember him in his speech talking about the
importance of voting, saying voting is what gives power to
the people. He made an example of that with reference to White
old ladies, namely the pensioners, referring to a predicament
in which they find themselves and how they overcomed that
which was shown on TV saying voting for the councillors does
not in fact give us again in power, the reason being that they
the councillors do not have the powers, although of course
voting does give some power to a person. He further said (10)
it is true that when councillors are canvassing for votes,
they do make some promises, especially about the rent where
they say there would not be any increase on rent and et cetera.
He further said that those promises they made, after they
are being elected into power, they then failed to carry out
those promises. He made an example to the residents of
Sharpeville. In fact in this fashion saying to them that
they must come together and unite. "In so doing they will be
able to overcome the difficulty that is facing them, because
the difficulty which they are facing, which is already (20)
on them is a kind of a difficulty with no mercy. Saying
pensioners, old ladies who are pensioners, there is no
mercy for them. People, those who are out of employment,
are all bound to this problem- He made it clear to the
residents of Sharpeville that they meet with the councillors
in order to discuss the question of rent. He further said
if that does not bring about a good result, it is only then
that this resolution can be carried out namely the requesting
of the councillors to resign. At the end of his address
he lifted his arm and shouted "Maatla". In response to that(30)
we /...
K1080.72 - 18 913 - MBATYA2WA
we, the audience, said "Ikusasa Ngelethu. Bokamoso ke Jwa
Rona.• That is in Sotho.
Did Mr Manthata tear up a piece of paper and throw it
on the ground? — I do not remember seeing that with my
eyes.
Did he hold up a piece of paper saying that this paper -
containing the rent increase - should be burnt? -- No, I do
not recall seeing that.
COURT: Did he hold up a piece of paper? — I did not see that.
It could be that I did not observe it, but I did not see it.(10)
MR BIZOS : Can you recall whether any other speaker spoke?
— Yes, I can recall that there was another speaker.
Can you recall who he was? — This person was introduced
as Patrick Baleka.
Did anyone say where he came from? — Yes, it was said
he is from Sowetc.
Can you recall whether any organisation that he might
have belonged to was mentioned? — No, not by somebody else.
He himself introduced himself in that respect.
What did he say in that respect? — He said that he (20)
was from AZANYU.
Can you recall very briefly what he said? What he spoke
about? — Again with him, because of the fact that this
happened some time ago, I may not be able to remember in
broad what he said in his speech. I do remember some of
the things that he said.
What do you remember him saying? — What he said was to
add to what was already said by the previous speakers, namely
with reference to the difficulty faced by the people inclu-
ding those that are unemployed and the increase of buying.(30)
COURT/...
, r K1080.80 - 18 914 - MBATYAZWA
C COURT : The increase of what? — The inflation. That i;
what I am referring to. The income tax which is rising,
saying all that as mentioned where the difficulties which
are being faced by the people. He did not have much to say.
K1081 MR 3IZ0S : Can you recall whether he started off by reciting
a poem called "Afrika Afrika"? -- Ke never recited.
Did he say that we are ready to fight if they want us
to fight? -- He never said that because in the first place
fighting was not the subject of discussion there.
Did he say we must listen to the song and fight? — He(10)
I did not say that.
MNR. FICK : Miskien verwys my geleerde vriend na die geval
van "Face the music" wat vertaal was as "Hoor my lied."
Dit is later reggestel. Ek dink dit is wat my geleerde
vriend in gedagte het.
MR 3IZ0S : The words I used are on record by one of the
state witnesses. Did he say anything about the SRC's? —
No, nothing was said about that.
Did he say anything about Mahlatsi increased the rent
. and Mahlatsi must pay the rent? — No, Mr Baleka. He did(20)
not say that.
COURT : Is there any relationship between accused no. 1
and Mr Baleka? — I do not know.
MR BI2OS : When you refer to Mr Baleka, you refer to accused
no. 1? — I can see the person referred to now, but at that
time he was still young and now he looks much older. He is
now a man.
Do you remember the correct order in which people spoke
or not? — I do remember.
All I want to ask you is this. You told us that (30}
Mr Ouoa/...
K1081.01 - 18 915 - MBATYA2WA
Mr Oupa Hlomoka, accused no. 2, the man sitting in the middle
of the three in front, did he speak before Mr Tom Manthata
accused no. 16, the guest speaker or after Mr Manthata? —
First accused no. 2 - first Mr Manthata, accused no. 16.
I am being confused by the numbers. May I refer to them by
their names?
COURT : Yes, we will add the numbers.
MR BIZOS : You told us that Mr Hlomoka, accused no. 2
proposed that the - the boycott of the councillors' shops?
— Yes. (10)
What happened to that proposal? — It was accepted by
the majority.
Did anyone at this meeting say that if anyone was seen
buying from the shops of councillors, the masses would kill
and murder them and burn their houses? Did anyone say any-
thing like that at the meeting? — There was no such a talk.
If anything of that sort was said, I would not have attended
those meetings any more.
Do you know any police officers by the name of Sergeant
Koaho or a Constable Letsele? — No, I do not know that. (20)
Did anything happen at this meeting which appeared to
you a threat to anyone present at the meeting? — No, nothing
at all.
Do you know a person by the name of Albert Botha? —
I did not know this person at the time.
Did you get to know him afterwards? — Yes.
When afterwards? How long after the 19th? — I only
came to know this person after the 3rd.
Of September? — Yes.
COURT : Of what year? — 1984. (30)
MR BIZOS/
K1081.05 - 18 916 - MBATYAZWA
MR BIZOS : Do you recall whether this person was at the
meeting of the 1-9th, Albert Botha and whether he said any-
thing? — If he was there, I did not see him and I cannot
recall him speaking.
Was there any singing at this meeting? — No.
Kow did the meeting finish? -- It finished peaceful.
Nkosi Sikilele i Afrika was sung. Then a prayer. After
that, an announcement was made to the meeting that there was
another meeting which was going to be held on the 26th. We
then parted from that meeting. (10)
I am not sure, was Nkosi Sikilele i Afrika sung or not?
— Yes, it was sung.
Was anything sung at the beginning of the meeting?
-- Yes.
What was sung at the beginning of the meeting? — Reya
boka Morena.
Besides these two hymns were there any other songs sang
at this meeting? — No, nothing else.
Did you consider this meeting as a meeting of the UDF
or of AZAPO or of COSAS or of any other political organisa-(20)
tion? — I took that meeting as it was there as the residents
meeting of Sharpeville.
Was anything said about the petition or legal action?
— Yes. What was said was that a reminder was made about
what had been referred to at the meeting to the 12th with
reference to the investigation about the legality of what
was happening and the petition and therefore that has not
yet been concluded. Some investigations are still going on.
You told us that there was an announcement - sorry,
I do not remember whether you said it or not. Was there (30)
going/...
K1081.09 - 18 917 - MBATYAZWA
going to be a meeting on the 26th?
COURT : Yes. ~ "-
MR BIZOS : Did you attend the meeting of the 26th? — I was
not able to attend although I was in fact interested in
attending that meeting.
Any reason why you could not attend?
COURT : Does it matter?
MR BIZOS : In case my learned friends want to check ... (Court
intervenes)
COURT : May be had flue? (10)
MR BIZOS : He was at work.
COURT : But he did not attend it?
MR BIZOS : He did not attend it. Did you go anywhere near
the church that afternoon? — I went to the church under
the impression that I may find that the meeting is still
proceeding.
And had it finished? — Unfortunately, yes. On arrival
there they had left.
And had it finished? — Unfortunately, yes. On arrival
there they had left. (20)
Did you find anybody at or near the church when you went
there? — Yes, I found somebody outside.
Did you know this person? — No, I do not know the name
of that person.
Did you do anything at the request of this person? — Yes,
this person whose name I had forgotten that I found on the
premises there had some documents which were relating to the
petition about which a resolution was taken.
And what did you do? — He handed me that document which
was signed by me. That I did because I knew about it and (30)
I/. . .
K1081.10 - 18 918 - MBATYAZWA
I war in fact awaiting that.
And when you signed it, you handed the document back?
— Yes, I handed it back to him.
Did you go to any meeting on 2 September 1984? — No,
I could not go.
When did you hear or did you hear about any stay- away
on 3 September 1984? — No.
When did you first hear about it? — Late afternoon on
a Sunday just before the Monday.
COURT : Every Sunday precedes a Monday. Which Sunday and(10)
which Monday? -- I think it was the 2nd before the Monday
of the 3rd.
Of September? — Yes.
MR BIZOS : What did you find out? — I was walking around
in the township in the streets there, when I picked up a
piece of paper on the ground. There was some writing on this
piece of paper. I read the contents, which message was on
that piece of paper that in the whole of the Vaal the workers,
school children and teachers, nobody is going to work on the
3rd, because of the complaint about the increase on rent. (20)
Did this document say who had issued it? — No, it did
not say where it originated from.
Had there been any discussion or any decision in the
trade union circles which you moved in at the time about
the stay-away on the 2nd before you picked up this piece
of paper? — Not at all.
Did you make any decision as to what you personally
would do the next day? — Not at the time. I did not take
a particular decision, except to say to myself well, I will
hear from the buses. If the buses are running, the noise (30)
of/...
K1081.12 - 18 919 - MBATYAZWA
of the buses is there. It would mean people are going to
work. I will just catch the bus and go to work.
Were the buses running the next morning? -- There were
no buses.
COURT : At what time do you catch a bus? — I leave home
at 05h30 because I start working at 06hO0.
And as from what time did you notice that there were no
buses? — I got up at the usual time which I get up daily
when I go to work and waited to hear the noise of the buses
driving past that area, because I am not far from the bus (10)
stop where I board my bus. So, there was no such a noise.
Just tell me the time that you get up? — About 05h20
is the time that I get up.
From getting up you only take ten minutes to catch a
bus? — Even less than that because I am not far from the
bus stop.
MR BIZOS : Did you see anything unusual happening at about
or early that morning? — It was at about 05h30 while I was
still waiting there to see what was happening when I heard
some noise which was a sound to me from guns and I later (20)
felt that something was affecting my eyes.
Did you hear anyone saying that there would be a march
in Sharpeville on 3 September 1984? — No.
Did you know early in the morning of the 3rd whether
or not there was going to be march in Sebokeng? — No.
COURT : Where do you live in Sharpeville? In which suburb?
— Vuka.
Do you live in Vuka? — Yes.
Near Dabula Drive? — Which one is this one now?
This is the one that has the bus route on? -- No, I do(30)
not/...
K1081.19 - 18 920 - MBATYAZWA
not know the place Your Lordship is referring to now.
Do you live very near the bus route? — Yes, the bus
route in the direction of Pick 'N Pa.y,
May I remind Your Lordship that he has changed his place
of residence. I am not sure to which he is referring to now.
COURT : Saying you live in Vuka, are you speaking as of
1984? — During the year 1934 is when I was staying in Vuka.
1 only moved last year which is 1987 to this new address I
am talking about. That is where I live at the present moment.
Do you live near the Lekoa Shandu High School? — No,(10)
the nearest school to me there was Mohlodi.
MR BISOS : You say that you felt that your eyes were
affected. At what time was that more or less? -- At about
06h30.
Did you remain indoors during the morning of the 3rd
or did you go out? — I decided that it was not going to be
possible to go to work for me at about O7hOO. While we were
still standing outside there watching what was happening,
surprised, still hearing the noise from the guns which were
firing and this thing affecting my eyes still there in the (20)
air, I heard a shot. I noticed that something was falling
next to me. That was a teargas can landing next to me, not
far from the doorway. The person with whom I was standing
outside there fell. I went around the house through the
kitchen door. I entered the house.
How many of you were there together when this canister
of teargas was shot and landed next to you? — We were three.
In fact the three of us were people who were going to work.
COURT : Where were you standing? — In the immediate vicinity
of the front door. (30)
MR BIZOS/...
K1081.21 - 18 921 - MBATYAZWA
M R BIZ OS : The front door of what? — Of the house.
Whose house? — Of the house owner at 1527. That is
the premises at which I had my structure put. up.
COURT : Did you see where this canister came from? — It
came from our left as we were standing there, from that
direction.
Across the roof? — No, not across the roof, but from
the side of the house.
MR BIZOS : Did you see anybody who were in the immediate
vicinity that might have sent you this canister? — There(10)
was some shouting from the people there, saying there are
some soldiers at Duke's place. As a result of which then
we looked in the direction of Duke's residence. From where
I was I could see that there were soldiers there because
there was nothing obscuring my view in seeing Duke's house.
COURT : Who is Duke? — Duke is a constable. I do not know
whether he is a CID or what kind of a constable he is.
Was there a crowd at Duke's house? — What I* noticed
at that time there were the White soldiers.
MR BIZOS : Were the three of you shouting or performing any(20)
sort of unruly act or were you just standing there? — No,
we were just engaged in a discussion amongst ourselves there,
about what was happening.
Did you remain at home or did you visit anyone? — I
remained home until at about 09h00, 09h30, when I decided
to go to Paul Nhlapo's house. Paul Nhlapo is -the old man
with whom I time and again attended the meetings.
How long did you stay there? — While walking towards
this man's place in the vicinity of the square and nearby
is a bottle-store. I noticed four police vehicles, landrovers,(3C
yellow/...
K1081.25 - 18 922 - MBATYAZWA
yellow in colour from where a policeman came out. Coming
in my direction he pointed a gun at me, as a result of which
I stopped. When I stopped he dropped his hand, meaning dropped
the gun and not pointing it at me. I started moving. When
I started moving he again pointed the gun at me. This
happened on three occasions. The fourth time this person
fired a shot in the air. I went on walking and then this
person returned to the vehicle until I reached Nhlapo's
place. I stayed there at Nhlapo's for the whole day. On
my way to Nhlapo's residence I did not see any damaging or(10)
damage to any property.
COURT : Tell me where does Nhlapo live? — Also in Vuka
in another street some distance away from my address where
I lived at the time.
MR BIZOS : My Lord, it will be proved that it is S328.
COURT : Let us wait till the evidence comes.
MR BIZOS : On your return in the afternoon home, did you
see any damage? — The things were bad then because the
streets were busy with people going in different directions.
One could not make out exactly what was happening. (20)
Were the streets clear at that time? — There were
obstructions at the time. In the streets you would find
dustbins and old motorcar scraps, obstructing the road.
Had there been such obstructions in the morning when
you left your home to go to Mr Nhlapo's place? — No, there
was none. What I can tell the court is I did see some
ashes on the road, but I did not know exactly what was
happening and to me there was nothing abnormal about it.
Did you pass anywhere near the Vuka Liquor Store or.
the 3rd? — I would not say I was near that, because at (30)
the/...
K1081.30 - 18 923 - MBATYAZWA
the time of my passing the police vehicles in the vicinity
of the bottle-store, I passed far away from it in this posi-
tion. First myself. Inbetween myself and the bottle-store
one would find the police vehicles which were parked there.
Are you now talking about the morning trip or the
return trip in the afternoon? — In the morning trip.
Did you become aware whether or not the Vuka Liquor
Store was damaged? — On arrival at home I only heard from
people saying the bottle-store was on fire. I personally
did not see that. (10)
COURT : Why lead this evidence?
MR BI2OS : It was not clear in my statement that it was
hearsay, as very often happens.
COURT : Ask your attorneys to check whether it is hearsay
or not.
MR BIZOS : I have no further questions.
MNR. FICK : Ek wil net op rekord plaas dat ons is Vrydag
meegedeel dat hier nog getuies van Sebokeng gelei sal word.
Ons is vanoggend meegedeel daar is vervoerprobleme en n
getuie van Sharpeville is hier. Ek sal met die,voorbe- (20)
reiding wat ek kon doen in ongeveer *n halfuur die getuie
kruisverhoor. Ek is byvoorbeeld glad nie in staat om oor
5 Augustus op hierdie stadium te kruisverhoor nie. Ek sal
oor die ander vergaderings kruisverhoor.
KRUISONDERVRAGING DEUR MNR. FICK : Van waar is u oorspronk-
lik? Is u van die Vaaldriehoek of kom u van n ander landstreek?
— Wil u weet waar ek gebore was?
Waar het u groot geword? — Herschel.
U het na u begin werk het na die Vaai gekom. Is dit
korrek? — Ja. (30)
HOF/...
K1081.31 - 18 924 - MBATYAZWA
HOF : In watter jaar? — Dit was in 1966 wat ek in die Vaal
gekom het.
Was u verblyf wettig? — Ja, ek was wettig gewees, want
met my aankoms daar was ek alreeds in diens gewees wettiglik.
MNR. FICK : Behalwe die stories wat u gehoor het in die
woor.gebiede dat u kan n huis kry deur "n omkoopbedrag van
R100,00 te betaal of u moet die persone wat uitgesit is
se agterstallige huur betaal, het u niks verder gedoen self
om h woning te kry nie. Is dit reg? — Nee, ek het probeer.
Die rede hoekom ek hierdie advies raakgeloop het by hierdie(lO)
mense, dat die mense my hierdie tipe advies gegee het, was
omdar ek nog steeds besig was om te probeer om my eie huis
te kry. Sedert die jaar 1979 het ek gesukkel tot en met die
jaar 1982 wat ek hierdie advies bekom het.
Ek wil nie lank hierop stilstaan nie, maar kan u net
vir die hof se hoe het u probeer om n huis te bekom in daardie
jare? Wat het u gedoen? — Die eerste raadslid wat ek genader
het in daardie tyd was mnr. Mal'esane wat destyds "n raadslid
was. Hy is die persoon wat my meegedeel het dat daar nie
huise was nie. (20)
En hy het niks van omkopery gepraat nie? — Hy self nie.
Behalwe dat u by die persoon gehoor het daar is nie
huise nie, het u iets verder gedoen? — Daar was niks anders
vir my om te doen nie, want hy was eintlik die sleutel vir
my. Ek moes sy toestemming gekry het as die raadslid van my
wyk.
U het horn net een maal genader? —• Nee, dit is nie net
een maal in die tydperk vanaf 1979 tot 1981 nie.
fioeveel keer het u horn genader? — Ek sal nie kan tel
hoeveel maal nie. Ek het verskeie kere na hom toe gegaan.(30)
Ek/...
K1081.35 - 18 925 - MBATYAZWA
Ek was to inwoner daar.
HOF : En by nie een geleentheid het hy vir u omkoopgeld
gevra nie? -- Nee, hy het niks gese nie. Wat my net gepla
het was dat ek bewus geword het van sekere mense wat nie
huise gehad het net soos ek dat hulle later huise toegeken is
nie.
Hoekom kom u hier stories vertel oor omkopery as die
man by wie jy kontak het nie to woord praat van omkoopgeld
nie? — Dit is omdat die mense saam met wie ek gesukkel het
om huise te bekom, wat toe later huise gekry het, vir my (10)
dit gese het. Dit is die manier hoe jy moet optree om to
huis te kan kry.
MNR. FICK : Het u ooit met daardie inlig'ting na die polisie
toe gegaan en gese "Kyk, ek wil ook to huis he, maar hier is
mense wat se hulle betaal omkoopgeld dan kry hulle huise,
u moet die saak oncersoek"? — Dit is omdat ek nie geweet
het dat die polisie enige rol speel met die toekenning van
huise nie.
Nee, wag net so to bietjie. Jy kan nie so daarby verby
kom nie. Die polisie ondersoek misdaad. Het u geweet (20)
dit is to misdaad om omkoopgeld te betaal en te ontvang? —
Ek het nie daarna gekyk nie. Ek het eintlik nie daaraan
gedink nie. Al wat ek in belang gestel het was om to huis
te kry.
Ek stel dit aan u, u hele getuienis hier oor die omkopery
is vals? Dit is daarom dat u die ooglopende ding, naamlik
om to klagte te gaan le het, nooit gedoen het nie?
ASSESSOR (MNR. KRUGEL) : Is u klaar met die prosedure om to
huis in die hande te kry, mr.r. Fick?
MNR. FICK : Ek wou nog een vraag daaroor gevra het. — (30)
Nee/. . .
K1081.39 - 18 926 - MBATYA2WA
Nee, ek stem nie saam met u stelling nie.
Het u by die raad se kantore self gaan aansoek doen om
h huis? — Ja, ek het. Met my aankoms daar was ek gese cat
ek wel kwalifiseer om h huis te kry. Ek kan b huis toegeken
word, maar my vrou is nie toegelaat in daardie gebied nie.
Sy sal dus nie daar kan bly nie.
HOF : Is dit dan nie die rede waarom u nie die huis gekry
het nie? -- Nee, dit is "n rede wat die raadslid vir my gegee
het nie. Dit is *n rede wat aan my gegee is na ek sommer
besluit het om self na die kantoor toe te gaan. Dit is die (10)
Administrasiekantoor, wat vir my dit gese het. Nie die
raadslid nie.
Maar was u vrou gekwalif iseer om in die woonbuurt te
woon? — Nee, sy het nie die reg gehad nie, omdat sy nie
gekwalif iseer het nie. Ek het gekwalif iseer. Ek wou gehad
het dat sy ook moet kwalifiseer net soos ek, want ek het nie
van n rede geweet hoekom sy nie kwalifiseer net soos ek nie.
Ja, maar afgesien daarvan, wat die owerhede betref was
u dus *n enkelloper? Gee hulle huise aan enkellopers? —
Net soos ek se, daar is mense wat saam met my gesukkel het(20)
op dieselfde basis en in dieselfde omstandighede met die
vrouens wat van die tuislande af gekom het, maar daardie
mense het later daarin geslaag om huise te kry.
MNR. FICK : Is die posisie nie dat wat die raad betref moes
u in h hostel gaan bly het nie, maar u wou nie in n hostel
bly nie, u wou u vrou ook saam met u laat bly in die woon-
gebied? — As dit miskien die geval was, sou hulle my dan
nie eers toegelaat het om in die lokasie te bly nie. Toe
ek daar kwalifikasies toegeken was was ek gese dat ek kwali-
fiseer om in die lokasie te bly. (30)
MNR. FICK/...
K1081.41 - 18 927 - MBATYAZWA
MNR. PICK : In *n hostel? Is dit nie die geval nie? — In
die lokasie. Kyk, die hostel is *n hostel en die lokasie is
"n lokasie.
Net een aspek nog, is u wettig getroud met u vrou wat
u se wettig u vrou is? — Ja.
U het "n huweliksertifikaat wat uitgereik is? — Ja.
Waar? Transkei of hier? — Sterkspruit. In die jaar
1960.
Waar is Sterkspruit? — Beyond Zastron.
ASSESSOR (MNR. KRUGEL) : Sterkspruit of Sterkstroom? — (10)
Sterkspruit.
MNR. FICK : Op die perseel waar u u konstruksie opgesit het,
het daar ook ander mense gekom en hulle konstruksies daar
kom opsit en daar kom woon? —Nee.
Was u die enigste loseerder op hierdie perseel? — Ja,
ek was die enigste loseerder.
HOF : U het 'n permit gehad daarvoor? — Ja.
Het u vrou ook 'n permit gehad? — Ek wou gehad het dat sy ook
op 'n permit geregistreer word sodat ek h huis ook kan kry.
Hulle het geweier. (20)
MNR. FICK : Het die eienaar van die perseel gewerk? — Ja.
Het u ooit enige kennis, amptelike kennis gekry dat u
enige verhoging moet betaal met ingang van 1 September 1984?
— Die kennisgewing het melding gemaak van die hele Vaal.
Hulle het nie daar in daardie kennisgewing gepraat van ver-
skillende persone nie.
HOF : Waar het u die kennisgewing gesien? -- By die vercace-
ring van die 5de waar ek was, waar hulle verduidelik het,
het hulle geen verskil gemaak nie.
Nie meer as ons nou praat van "n kennisgewing, dan is(30)
dit/...
K1081.48 - 18 928 - MBATYAZWA
dit h Dtuk papier. Het u *n stuk papier gesien waarop staan
wat die verhoging is? — Te Sharpeville was daar nie spesi-
fieke kennisgewings uitgestuur in Sharpeville dat die mense
kennis moet neem dat die huur verhoog word in Sharpeville
nie. Wat ons wel gehoor het was dat die huur verhoog gaan
word in die hele Vaai.
U het self nie h dokument gesien wat vir h permit
verhoog word, wat vir ft huis verhoog word, hoe dit inmekaar
sit nie? — Niemand het dit gekry nie.
Het niemand skriftelik kennis gekry nie? — Nee, (10)
MR BIZOS : My Lord, if my memory serves me correctly it is
AAQ19.
HOF : Hier is AAQ19. Het u ooit so h dokument gesien? —
Hierdie soort van ft dokument het net tot by die raadslede
gekom, nie na ons nie. As ons hierdie soort van h dokument
gekry het, die kennisgewing wat na verwys word as AAQ19,
dan was daar geen rede vir ons gewees om nog met hulle daar
te staan en stry nie, want dan sou ons geweet het presies
wat daar uiteen gesit word.
MNR. FICK : Ek wil net aan u stel wat volgens hierdie (20)
BEWYSSTUK AAQ19 op die teenkant waar die hoof is "Memorandum"
word daar gese "Recognisance must also be taken of the fact
that lodger permit fees remain unchanged." — Ek stem saam
met u, maar wat ek se is dat daardie dokument het net by
hulle gebly. Dit was nie na ons toe deurgestuur nie.
HOF : So, as die dokument reg is, dan het u die dokument
by die stert beetgehad? — Nee, hulle het nie aan ons die
hele waarheid verduidelik nie.
Op die vergadering van die 5de toe u nou daar met die
raadslede by die vergadering was, het u of enigiemand (30)
anders/...
r
K1081.50 - 18 929 - MBATYAZWA
> anders vir die raadslede gevra "Maar wat is die posisie met
loseerders? Moet hulle meer betaal?" — Ja, baie mense het
daaromtrent gevra, maar die antwoord was net nie duidelik
van die raadslede, wat die antwoord is met betrekking tot
die loseerders nie. Ek was ook een van die mense gewees
wat later sou teruggegaan het na daardie vraag toe. Myne
sou behels het selfs die kinders wat saam met die ouers
woon in die huise, wat ook loseerderspermit betaal. Wat
van hulle? Maar ongelukkig het die vergadering uiteen
gegaan voor ek dit kon gevra het. (10)
MNR. PICK : Waarom het u nie toe u nou nie n kans kry om
die vraag te vra op 5 Augustus se vergadering, na die
raad se kantore toe geloop en vir een van die beamptes daar
gese "Verduidelik net vir my, se net vir my, betaal ons
meer of betaal ons nie meer nie?" — Na wie toe? Na wie
toe moet ek gaan by die kantore, want hier het ons die raads-
lede gehad wat met ons hierointrent kom praat het.
En het u nie gedink u kan by die raad se kantore met
een van die raadslede gaan praat nie? — Hoekom moet ek
privaat na hulle toe gaan? Hoekom? Dit was bedoel vir die(20)
gemeenskap as n geheel by hierdie vergadering.
Ek wil met u oorgaan na 12 Augustus 1984 se vergadering.
GETUIE STAAN AF.
HOF VERDAAG TOT 14h00.
Historical Papers, Wits University
http://www.historicalpapers.wits.ac.za/admin/cms_header.php?did=3324[2009/07/23 10:10:47 AM]
DELMAS TREASON TRIAL 1985-1989 PUBLISHER:Publisher:- Historical Papers, The University of the WitwatersrandLocation:- Johannesburg©2009
LEGAL NOTICES:
Copyright Notice: All materials on the Historical Papers website are protected by South African copyright law andmay not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, or otherwise published in any format, without the priorwritten permission of the copyright owner.
Disclaimer and Terms of Use: Provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained therein, youmay download material (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal and/oreducational non-commercial use only.
People using these records relating to the archives of Historical Papers, The Library, University of the Witwatersrand,Johannesburg, are reminded that such records sometimes contain material which is uncorroborated, inaccurate,distorted or untrue. While these digital records are true facsimiles of paper documents and the information containedherein is obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable, Historical Papers, University of the Witwatersrandhas not independently verified their content. Consequently, the University is not responsible for any errors oromissions and excludes any and all liability for any errors in or omissions from the information on the website or any relatedinformation on third party websites accessible from this website.
DOCUMENT DETAILS:
Document ID:- AK2117-I2-28-331Document Title:- Vol 331 p 18895-18929. Witness: Mbatyazwa