imaging of geochemical data, by bgs ni

27
Talking With Maps 2010 Imaging of geochemical data by interpolation within geological boundaries Don Appleton (British Geological Survey) Presented by Claire McGinn (Geological Survey of Northern Ireland)

Upload: british-cartographic-society

Post on 05-Dec-2014

831 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Imaging of geochemical data by interpolation within geological boundaries

Don Appleton (British Geological Survey)

Presented by Claire McGinn (Geological Survey of Northern Ireland)

Page 2: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010Acknowledgements

This work is based on research using a VB.Net tool compiled for ArcGIS 9.3 by Keith Adlam (BGS)

Data for this work were provided by the Tellus Project, funded by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment of Northern Ireland.

The contributions of GSNI and BGS staff who collected, prepared and analysed the Tellus soil samples is gratefully acknowledged.

Page 3: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Area: 14,000km2

Northern Ireland

Page 4: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Tellus Project: Northern Ireland Soil data

Page 5: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Who uses Tellus data?

• Environmental Agencies• Commercial Industries• Marine Scientists• Agricultural Departments• Universities• Local Councils• Regulatory Authorities

Page 6: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Potentially Harmful Elements (PHE)

• Arsenic (As)• Cadmium (Cd)• Chromium (Cr)• Lead (Pb)

Nickel (Ni) in soils

Page 7: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Gridding by Inverse Distance Weighting: Chromium

Page 8: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Simplified Bedrock Geology Map

Page 9: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010 Methodologies

Inverse Distance Weighting

versus

Soil Parent Material (i.e. within geological boundaries)

Page 10: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Bedrock geology boundaries

Superficial geology boundaries

Page 11: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Page 12: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Page 13: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Page 14: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Page 15: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Page 16: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

3

2

2

34

2

44

43

4+4+4+3+2=17

17/5=3.4

4+3+3+2+2=14

14/5=2.8

Page 17: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

4+4+4+3+2=17

17/5=3.4

4+3+3+2+2=14

14/5=2.8

1-2.93-4.95-6.97-8.9

Page 18: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

4+4+4+3+2=17

17/5=3.4

4+3+3+2+2=14

14/5=2.8

1-2.93-4.95-6.97-8.9

Page 19: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Step 1: Geology polygons are intersected with the 1km GridStep 2: Centroids are created for each geological polygon within each 1km polygonStep 3: VB.Net Tool identifies the nearest 5 soil sites to the centroidfor the Parent material and superficial geology

Page 20: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Rasterised image of the centroidsinterpolated within parent material boundaries

Sample points and centroids(Parent material method )

Page 21: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Chromium in soils

New Parent Material mapping

Old method using IDW mapping.

Page 22: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Parent Material soil chemistry maps: optimum number of samples for Parent Material mapping

 

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 5 10 15 20 25

Number of neighbouring samples

MSD

As AVCr AVNi AVPb AVAverage of As, Cr, Ni, Pb AVOverall average ALR-GALA

( )2

1

measured estimatedn1 MSD ∑

=

−=n

i

Page 23: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Evaluation of Parent Material and IDW soil chemistry mapping using holdout validation

Element Spatial analyst IDW

Parent Material mapping (GM)

Parent Material mapping (IDW GM)

As 0.18 0.15 0.16Cr 0.43 0.31 0.31Pb 0.20 0.19 0.21

Mean squared deviation (MSD) for As, Cr and Pb for the three mapping methods based on combining the results for two 10% holdout subsets. Lowest MSD values for each element indicated in bold type. (Lne data).

( )2

1

measured estimatedn1 MSD ∑

=

−=n

i

Page 24: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Chromium in soils – all NI

New regional Parent Material mapping.

Old version using IDW

Page 25: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Nickel above Soil Guideline Values (SGV)Residential 130 mg/kg; Allotments 230 mg/kg

Page 26: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

Arsenic above Soil Guideline ValuesResidential 32 mg/kg; Allotments 43 mg/kg

Page 27: Imaging of geochemical data, by BGS NI

TalkingWith Maps

2010

For more information

Contact GSNI: [email protected]

GeoIndex:http://maps.bgs.ac.uk/gsni_geoindex/