how to win an argument “the aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but...

13
How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

Upload: darcy-phelps

Post on 03-Jan-2016

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

How to win an argument

“The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.”

Joseph Joubert

Page 2: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

From ancient Greece to the late 19th Century, it was a central part of Western education, filling the need to train public speakers and writers to move audiences to action with arguments.

Rhetoric is the art of using language tocommunicate effectively. It involves three audience appeals: logos, pathos, and ethos.

Page 3: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

Persuasive strategies

• Logos – Logical appeal•Pathos – Emotional appeal• Ethos – Ethical appeal

Page 4: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

I. Logos – Logical Appeal

Logic, reasoning, and evidence are the hallmarks of logos, loosely translatable to “logic.” 1. Writers and speakers appeal to logos, or

reason, by offering clear, rational ideas.• Logical appeal petitions the audience’s mind

rather than the audience’s heart.

Page 5: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

I. Logos – Logical Appeal2. A second tool to employ in persuading an audience

through logos is a counterargument. The three parts of a counterargument are:a. Acknowledging- the writer lets the reader know he

or she is aware of the opposing position (concession)b. Accommodating- the writer validates objections to

his or her arguments (validation)c. Refuting- the writer proposes his or her objections to

the reader’s position by asserting that an opponent’s arguments are flawed and arguing against them. (debate)

Page 6: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

I. Logos – Logical Appeal

3. A logical fallacy is a flaw in logic. Examples:– If a student studies for 30 minutes, then I

should make a passing grade. – If a student has an 80 average in English II

and makes a 100 on a quiz, then his/her grade will improve.

Page 7: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

I. Logos – Logical Appeal

4. Logical reasoning will rely on… • Facts as evidence• Research• Tradition (precedent)• Authorities• Cause and effect relationships• Metaphors

Page 8: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

II. Pathos - Emotional Appeal

• Passion, not logic, stirs most people to take a stance.

• Writers employ the emotional appeal, pathos, which, in Greek, loosely translates to “pain” to stir their audience’s emotions.

• Wise writers must evoke their audience’s emotions judiciously and fairly; otherwise, the appeal is seen as sentimentality or melodramatic.

Page 9: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

II. Pathos - Emotional Appeal

1. Pathos uses a more relaxed tone and appeals to the basic needs that all people have:

a. Physical needs – life and health of the body

b. Psychological needs – a person’s need for love and self-respect

c. Social needs – the need for freedom, status, power, and acceptance

Page 10: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

II. Pathos - Emotional Appeal

2. Words are carefully selected for their connotative value rather than their denotative meaning

3. Appeals to pity and compassion4. Usually includes vivid, concrete description

and figurative language.5. Photographs and other visual images may

strengthen the pathos-based argument

Page 11: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

III. Ethos – Ethical Appeal

• Ethos in Greek loosely translates to “character.” • In effective argumentation, the

presenter must not only possess good character but also argue in ways that reveal that good character.

Page 12: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

III. Ethos – Ethical Appeal1. The audience should see presenters as people

very much like themselves (or the way they ideally would like to be.) a. Therefore, presenters must establish

credibility, (trustworthiness), with the audience.

b. Skilled persuasive writers will avoid inflammatory language.

c. Inflammatory language - language that provokes the audience or language that makes the audience feel attacked

Page 13: How to win an argument “The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.” Joseph Joubert

III. Ethos – Ethical Appeal2. Makes qualified claims 3. Notes exceptions to rules, using terms such as

perhaps, some, and many.4. Restates opposing view(s) accurately and fairly5. Associates self with relevant authorities and

makes relevant allusions6. Uses first-person plural pronouns, we and us, to

establish a relationship between the writer and reader.