hll vs itc sem iii

Upload: pushpanjalij

Post on 14-Apr-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    1/122

    ITC

    HUL

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    2/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    3/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    4/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    5/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    6/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    7/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    8/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    9/122

    ITC LimitedOne of Indias Most Valuable Corporations

    Roll No : 1 to 30

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    10/122

    One of the 8 Indian Companies to feature in Forbes A-listfor 2004

    Featuring 400 of the Worldsbest big companies with M-cap. > USD 5 bln. &

    are rated as the most attractive companies forinvestors

    Only Indian FMCG Company to feature in Forbes 2000 List

    A comprehensive ranking of worlds biggest companies measured by a

    composite of sales, profits, assets & market value Among top in :

    Sustained value creation (BT-Stern Stewart survey)

    Operating profits

    Cash Profits

    Ranks No. 10 among Indian listed Private Sector Companies by market cap.

    (@27/07/07)

    No. 1 in FMCG Sector

    Rated as one of Indias Most Respected Companies (IMRB-Businessworld

    Survey 2006)

    ITCOne of Indias most valuable corporations

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    11/122

    BRIEF HISTORY

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    12/122

    VisionSustain ITCs position as one of Indias most valuable

    corporation through world class performance,

    Creating growing value fro the Indian economy and the

    company's stakeholder

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    13/122

    Mission

    To enhance the wealth generating capability of the

    enterprise globalising environment, delivering

    superior and sustainable Stakeholder value

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    14/122

    ITC's Core Values

    Trusteeship

    Customer Focus

    Respect For People Excellence

    Innovation

    Nation Orientation

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    15/122

    Organization Structure

    ITC LTD.

    B.O.D.

    Chairman-1Executive-4

    Non Exe-11

    C.M.C.Directors-4

    Executive-4

    D.M.C.

    Cigarettes and

    Other FMCGHotels

    Agri

    businessPaper

    Board

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    16/122

    Sustain multiple drivers of growth, matching internal

    capabilities with emerging market opportunities

    Pursue World class competitiveness in all businesses and

    across the entire value chain

    Best-in-class in terms of:

    Internal Vitality

    Market Standing

    Profitability

    Strategy of Organisation and Governance processes

    geared to manage multiple businesses

    Blend core competencies and leverage ITC umbrella

    strengths to create new avenues of growth

    Corporate Strategies

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    17/122

    Corporate Governance-Core

    Principles

    Trusteeship

    Transparency

    Empowerment and Accountability Control

    Ethical corporate citizenship

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    18/122

    ITC strives to be Citizen First

    Contribute to the 'Triple Bottom Line',

    Economic, Environmental and Social

    1ST

    Indian company to come out withSustainability Report, in 2005, certifiedby PwC.

    Preservation and enrichment of precious

    environmentalresources

    Safe and healthy workplace for its employees.

    ITC's social development initiatives

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    19/122

    Responsibility Towards Economy

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    20/122

    Management Approach

    Policy:

    The Company's commitment in the area ofeconomic performance is encapsulated in

    its Vision statement, which is 'to sustainITC's position as one of India's mostvaluable corporations through world-class

    performance, creating growing value forthe Indian economy and the Company'sstakeholders'.

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    21/122

    Goals and Performance

    Sustaining ITC's position as one of India'smost valuable corporations

    Achieving leadership in each of thebusiness segments within a reasonabletime frame

    Achieving a Return on Capital Employed

    (ROCE) in excess of the Company's costof capital, at all times

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    22/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    23/122

    Pension Obligations

    Employee Retirement Benefit Scheme

    Provident Fund & Family Pension

    Local Hiring & Social Management

    Inducts quality talent from premium campus

    Range of Selection tools used:

    Assessment Centers In-Depth Personal interviews

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    24/122

    Responsibility Towards Environment

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    25/122

    Management Approach

    Policy

    ITC endeavours not only to minimise its

    environmental footprint but wherever possiblecreate a positive environmental footprint. TheCorporate Management Committee of theCompany has issued an Environment, Health &

    Safety Policy .

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    26/122

    Goals & Performance

    Performance Beyond Compliance

    Carbon Positive Footprint

    Water Positive Footprint Zero Solid Waste (reduction, reuse and100% recycling of all solid wastes)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    27/122

    ITC is Committed to Energy

    Sustainability

    ITC's Strategy on Energy sustainability& commitment towards reducing GHGemissions

    Ensuring availability & sustainability ofenergy supply

    Benchmarking specific energy

    consumption to progressively achievereduction

    Using renewable resources

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    28/122

    Water Positive Corporation

    Total Water Intake at all units 25.6mkl(mn kilo ltr)

    Conservation,Audits & benchmarking {to achievethe lowest specific water consumption (water perunit of production)}

    Zero Waste Water Discharge- Treating &recycling all waste water,thereby not onlyreducing fresh water intake but also preventingpollution of fresh water resources.

    Creating Positive Footprint Through rain waterharvesting both at the co. premises andwatershed projects

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    29/122

    Towards Zero Solid Waste

    Facts: Urban India alone generates an estimated

    48 mn of solid waste each year.

    More than 25% of municipal solid waste isnever collected for clearance

    70% cities lack transport facilities forgarbage disposal

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    30/122

    In 2005-06 total solid waste generated3,14,585 tonnes.

    2,47,428 tonnes in 2005-06

    Recycling

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    31/122

    Corporate Social Responsibility

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    32/122

    Human Rights

    Policy

    ITC is committed to conducting business in a

    manner that reflects its high ethical and moralstandards. It expects its employees andbusiness partners to subscribe and adhere tothis philosophy, which honours all local laws

    and upholds the spirit of human rights asenshrined in existing international standardssuch as the Universal Declaration and theFundamental Human Rights Conventions of

    the ILO.

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    33/122

    Prevention of discrimination at Workplace

    Freedom of Association

    Prohibition of Child and Forced Labor

    Risk control programmes: HIV/AIDS e- Choupal

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    34/122

    Corporate Social Responsibility

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    35/122

    No success or achievement in material terms isworthwhile unless it serves the needs or interests of thecountry and its people. - J.R.D. Tata

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    36/122

    CSR undertaken by HUL

    Greening Barrens

    Lifebuoy Swasthya Chetana

    The Fair and Lovely Foundation

    Happy Homes

    Yashodham

    Shakti

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    37/122

    The fair and lovely foundation

    Empowerment of women

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    38/122

    Education

    Project Saraswati -

    H igh school

    Graduate - Post Graduates

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    39/122

    Career Guidance

    Project Disha

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    40/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    41/122

    The begining

    Objective of shaktiRural development

    Shakti Vani

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    42/122

    Vision of Shakti

    HLL envisions the creation of 1,00,000 Shakti

    Entrepreneurs covering 5,00,000 villages, and touching

    the lives of 600 million rural people by the year 2010.

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    43/122

    Greening Barrens

    Water Conservation and Harvesting

    Project has two major ojectives :-

    To reduce water consumption in its own operations

    Regenerate sub-soil water tables at its own sites through

    the principles of 5R - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recoverand Renew.

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    44/122

    Programs for water management

    Water shade management on a 5 hectare plot to prevent soildegradation and conserve water

    In villageParkhed in association TERI and the Bharatiya Agro

    industries foundationKarchond village, near the Silvassa site has built 42 bunds

    since 2003

    Extended to factories -

    The Hosur Coffee Factory

    Yavatmal Personal Products Factory

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    45/122

    Marketing Perspective

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    46/122

    Problem faced

    Inertia of Success : Ignores the danger of

    competition

    IBM, General Motors and Maruti which

    were undisputed leaders have also faced

    this problem

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    47/122

    Lesson learned

    Lesson 1 : Top management from CEO

    onwards has to keep in touch

    with ground realities

    Lesson 2: CEO should have the courage of

    convection to stand upto

    pressure from head office

    Lesson 3: Company should be innovativeand there should not be

    resistance to change

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    48/122

    Lesson learned

    Lesson 4: Company has its own history

    and culture on which its

    management can draw

    upon

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    49/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    50/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    51/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    52/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    53/122

    (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    54/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    55/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    56/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    57/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    58/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    59/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    60/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    61/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    62/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    63/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    64/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    65/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    66/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    67/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    68/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    69/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    70/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    71/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    72/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    73/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    74/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    75/122

    ITC - Business Portfolio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    76/122

    76

    ITC - Business Portfolio

    ITC

    FMCG:CigarettesOther FMCG

    Hotels Agri BusinessLeaf TobaccoAgri Commodities

    PaperboardPaper &

    Packaging

    Cigarettes & other

    FMCG

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    77/122

    Cigarettes & otherFMCG

    FMCG

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    78/122

    FMCG

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    79/122

    FMCG

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    80/122

    80

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    81/122

    Information Technology

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    82/122

    82

    3 D M d l

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    83/122

    3 D Model

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    84/122

    Financial Perspective

    S t i S l

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    85/122

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    % of Sales

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    By Segement % of Sales

    Otehrs

    Chemical, Agriculture, Fertilizer

    & Animal Foods

    Food

    Personal Products

    Soap, Detergent & Household

    care

    Segment wise Sales

    SEGMENTAL REVENUE FOR Yr 2006

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    86/122

    64%6%

    4%

    15%

    11%

    Cigarettes

    Fmcg

    Hotels

    Agri business

    Paper

    SEGMENTAL REVENUE FOR Yr 2007

    60%

    8%

    5%

    17%

    10%

    Cigarettes

    FmcgHotels

    Agri bus ines s

    Paper

    CIGARETTES

    BY 4%

    FMCG

    BY 2%

    HOTELS

    BY 1%

    AGRI BUSS

    BY 2%

    ROSE (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    87/122

    ROSE (%)

    68.1361.07

    57.21

    82.84

    46.1050.13

    0

    1020

    30

    40

    50

    60

    7080

    90

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    ROSE(%

    ROSE (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    88/122

    ROSE

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    ROSE(%)

    ROCE (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    89/122

    ROCE (%)

    66.6 66.6 67.9

    42.2

    58.4 56.2 57.9

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    ROCE (%)

    ROCE (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    90/122

    ROCE

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    ROCE(%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    91/122

    Shareholders' Equity

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.C

    rores

    C t R ti V Q i k

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    92/122

    Current Ratio Vs Quick

    Ratio

    Current ratio vs Quick ratio

    0.70 0.67

    0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96

    0.36 0.35

    0.49 0.540.56 0.60

    0.000.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.801.00

    1.20

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    year

    times Curr. ratio

    Quick ratio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    93/122

    Current Ratio & Quick Ratio

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.81

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Ra

    tio

    Current Assets Vs

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    94/122

    Current Assets Vs

    Inventory

    CA vs Inventory

    0

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    300000

    350000

    400000

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.

    inlacs

    CA

    Inventory

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    95/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    96/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    97/122

    Profit After Tax

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    98/122

    Profit After Tax

    PAT

    185537.34

    140810.44

    119734.37

    177179.4 170145.69

    157635.55

    0

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    RSinlacs

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    99/122

    PAT

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.Cr

    ores

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    100/122

    PBIT

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.C

    rores

    EPS

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    101/122

    EPS

    EPS

    7.167.73 8.05

    5.446.4

    8.41

    01

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Rs

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    102/122

    EPS

    0

    10

    20

    30

    4050

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.

    PerShare

    P/E Ratio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    103/122

    P/E Ratio

    P/E Ratio

    31.23

    23.57 25.4326.38

    30.84

    25.76

    0

    5

    10

    15

    2025

    30

    35

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Rs

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    104/122

    P/E Ratio

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Ratio(Times)

    Dividend Per Equity

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    105/122

    Share

    Dividend Per Equity Share

    4.5 4.98

    3

    5 5

    6.01

    0

    1

    2

    3

    45

    6

    7

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Rs

    Yield (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    106/122

    Yield (%)

    Yield (%)

    2.01

    2.74

    3.48

    1.47

    2.74

    2.01

    00.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    In%

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    107/122

    Dividend Yield

    0

    5

    10

    1520

    25

    30

    35

    40

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Yield

    (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    108/122

    DPS

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    Rs.PerS

    hare

    Payout And Plough back (%)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    109/122

    Payout And Plough back (%)

    62.82

    37.18

    64.4

    35.6

    37.27

    62.73

    91.92

    8.08

    78.16

    21.84

    71.44

    28.56

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    in %

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Payout (%) and Ploughback (%)

    Ploughback (%)

    Payout (%)

    Pl hb k R ti

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    110/122

    Ploughback Ratio

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    Year

    P

    ercent

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    111/122

    2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Payout Ratio

    Year

    Percent

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    112/122

    Other Parameters

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    113/122

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    114/122

    Economic Value Added (EVA)

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    115/122

    EVA (In Rs Crore)

    0200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    RsCrore

    Economic Value Added (EVA)

    Proprietary Ratio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    116/122

    Proprietary Ratio

    Proprietary Ratio

    0.97 0.98

    0.56 0.59

    0.98 0.97

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Ratio

    Cash Position Ratio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    117/122

    Cash Position Ratio

    Cash Position Ratio

    0.09 0.09

    0.19 0.21

    0.25 0.26

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

    Year

    Ratio

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    118/122

    ITCVsBSE FMCG Index

    41.97

    69.43

    89.58

    194.95

    150.4

    00

    1109.8 1058.97

    1647.47

    1934.17

    2137.42

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Year

    Rs

    .

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Performance Track Record- Snapshot

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    119/122

    Rs. Crs1995-96 2006-07

    Actuals Actuals

    GROSS TURNOVER 5115 19505 12.9

    NET TURNOVER 2536 12369 15.5

    PBDIT 584 4293 19.9

    PBIT 536 3930 19.9

    PBT 452 3927 21.7

    PAT (before exceptional items) 261 2700 23.7

    Earnings Per Share (Rs) 0.7 7.2 23.4

    NETWORTH 1121 10425 22.5

    CAPITAL EMPLOYED 1886 11125 17.5

    ROCE % 28.4 35.3

    Cagr %

    Total Shareholder Returns: 25%

    Rs. 1 crore= Rs. 10 million

    Key Financials:2006/07

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    120/122

    y

    Rs. Crs.

    GTO 19505 20.2NTO 12369 26.3PBT 3927 20.1PAT 2700 18.4

    PAT (after Exceptional Items) 2700 20.8Balance Sheet Size 11125 17.0

    Non Cigarettes Business 52% of NTO

    (48% LY)

    Segment Results: FY 06/07Rs. Crores

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    121/122

    FY FY

    2006-07 2005-06

    2. Segment Results

    a) FMCG - Cigarettes 3172 2709 17.1

    - Others (202) (172) (17.6)

    Total FMCG 2970 2537 17.1

    b) Hotels 351 258 35.9

    c) Agri Business 123 91 35.4

    d) Paperboards, Paper & Packaging 417 351 18.6

    3861 3237 19.3

    Les i) Interest (Net) 3 12 (72.5)

    ii) (69) (44) -

    Profit Before Tax 3927 3269 20.1

    Goly (%)

    Other un-allocable expenditure net

    of un-allocable income

    Total

    Segment Capital Employed: FY 06/07

  • 7/27/2019 HLL VS ITC SEM III

    122/122

    Rs. Cror es

    FY FY

    2006-07 2005-06

    3. Capital Employed

    a) FMCG - Cigarettes* 2019 1464 37.9

    - Others 940 489 92.2

    Total FMCG 2959 1953 51.5

    b) Hotels 1467 1374 6.8

    c) Agri Business 1480 1060 39.7

    d) Paperboards, Paper & Packaging 2559 1908 34.1

    8465 6295 34.5

    Goly (%)

    Total Segment Capital Employed