gold fields limited -...
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSFORM DIVERSIFY GROW
Gold Fields LimitedTo be the Global Leader in Sustainable Gold Mining
Nick Holland Chief E ec ti e OfficerNick Holland, Chief Executive Officer 27 February 20122012 BMO Global Metals & Mining Conference, Hollywood, Florida
Forward looking statements
Certain statements in this document constitute “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
In particular, the forward looking statements in this document include those relating to the global economy and outlook; changes and forecasts of gross domestic
products; changes in legal, tax and other regulatory regimes; commodity prices; demand for gold and other metals and minerals; interest rate expectations; exploration
and production costs; levels of expected production; Gold Fields’ growth pipeline; levels and expected benefits of current and planned capital expenditures; future
reserve, resource and other mineralisation levels; and the extent of cost efficiencies and savings to be achieved. Such forward looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the company to be materially different from
the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include
among others: economic, business and political conditions in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru and elsewhere; the ability to achieve anticipated efficiencies and
other cost savings in connection with past and future acquisitions, exploration and development activities; decreases in the market price of gold and/or copper; hazards
associated with underground and surface gold mining; labour disruptions; availability terms and deployment of capital or credit; changes in government regulations,
particularly taxation and environmental regulations; and new legislation affecting mining and mineral rights; changes in exchange rates; currency devaluations; the
availability and cost of raw and finished materials; the cost of energy and water; inflation and other macro-economic factors, industrial action, temporary stoppages of
mines for safety and unplanned maintenance reasons; and the impact of the AIDS and other occupational health risks experienced by Gold Fields’ employees.
These forward looking statements speak only as of the date of this document. Gold Fields undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these
forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
2
What Gold Fields offers today
80.6 million ounces of reserves1A Quality Reserve
3.5 million ounces per annum2Solid Production Base
US$752 million4 (C2011)Robust Free Cash Flow
51:49 (RoW3:SA) production split (C2011) Geographical Diversification
US$752 million (C2011)Robust Free Cash Flow
Targeting 5Moz5 by 2015Strong Growth Pipeline
Net debt to EBITDA ratio - 0 33 times6Conservative Balance Sheet Net debt to EBITDA ratio - 0.33 timesConservative Balance Sheet
If we cannot mine safely, we will not mineCommitment to Safety
F ll t ld iU h d d Full exposure to gold priceUnhedged
Baa3; Positive (Moody’s) | BBB-; Stable (S&P)Commitment to Investment Grade Rating
_________________________________________________________1.Attributable gold equivalent Mineral Reserves as at 31 December 20112.Attributable gold equivalent production for the 12 months to December 20113.RoW: Rest of World (includes attributable gold equivalent ounces from international regions)4.Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditure – additions 5 Five million ounces in production or in development by 2015
Highest dividend yield in senior sector7Returning cash to Shareholders
5.Five million ounces in production or in development by 20156.Net Debt to EBITDA ratio for 2011 is calculated by dividing net debt as at 31 December 2011 by EBITDA for the December 2011 quarter annualised.7.Peer group: GoldCorp, Newcrest, Kinross, AngloGold, Newmont, Barrick
3
Replacing and growing the Mineral Reserve position
Headline numbers1 – Mineral Reserve as at 31 December 2011
Moz 80.6Moz
80
82
76 7Moz
Attributable Reserves
76
78
76.7MozAttributable Reserves
74
3 9Moz 7 8Moz
70
72 3.9MozDepletion
7.8MozAdditions
_____________________________________1. Group total figures are equivalent gold ounces and includes Cerro Corona (Au and Cu Au-equivalents) (Includes discovery and model changes through better geological understanding and gold
68
B 1 C t 2 C t 3 C t 431 December 2010 31 December 2011*
price change)* Note: 31 December 2011 figures are net of production depletion.
4
Mineral Reserve
Diversifying and improving the composition of the portfolio over time
Dec 2006 Attributable AuEq Reserve Dec 2011 Attributable AuEq Reserve
3%
(93.8Moz)
0%
(80.6Moz)
46%
11%
7%
23%
4%15%
8%5%
46%
33%
4%
45%
KDC & Beatrix
SRD & TSF
South Deep*
p
West Africa
South America
Australasia
5
_________________* SRD and TSF = Surface Rock Dump and Tailing Storage Facilities for KDC East and West in South Africa
Mineral Reserve
Attributable Mineral Reserves per mine/project (million AuEq ounces)
40
34.5
36.6
30
35
40Dec-10 Dec-11
20
25
30
-Au
Eq.
(Moz
)
11.9
7.9 7 0
9.310
15
Au
and
Cu-
1.3 0.2 0.32.8
1.5
5.44.3
6.6
1.3 1.4 1.82.8 3.1
5.06.0 6.4 7.0
0
5
w &
&
es ng rix na W E wa ep
Agn
e
KD
C W
SR
D
TSF
KD
C E
SR
D
TSF St I
v e
Dam
an
Bea
tr
Cer
ro C
oron
KD
C W
KD
C
Tark
w
Sou
th D
ee
6
Mineral Resource
Attributable Mineral Resources per mine/project (million AuEq ounces)
90
81.5
74.8
70
80
Moz
)
Dec-10 Dec-11
40.2 38.440
50
60
d C
u-A
u E
q. (M
16.012.6
9 0
31.1
11.3 12.2 13.6
25.0
20
30
Au,
2P
GE
an
0.6 2.0 2.6 3.8 2.9 5.8 7.0 6.53.3
9.0
0.6 1.7 2.4 3.8 3.9 5.3 7.0 7.6 9.0
0
10
folila
RD
&
RD
&
gnew
paca
t Ive
s
Tala
s
oron
a
man
g
eatri
x
AP
P
arkw
a
DC
W
DC
E
Dee
p
_________________Excludes Woodjam Copper – 541 Mlb and Gold (by-product) - 0.132 Moz
Yan
f
KD
C W
SR
TSF
KD
C E
SR
TSF Ag
Chu
cap St T
Cer
ro C
o
Dam B
e
Ta KD KD
Sou
th D
7
Excludes South Deep TSF 0.4Moz APP includes 2PGE +Au
F2011 Highlights97% i i NCE i t US$396/ i t 29% i i
Attributable production of 3 49 million gold
97% increase in NCE margin per ounce to US$396/oz against a 29% increase in the US$ gold price
Cash Flow (US$m) Attributable production of 3.49 million gold
equivalent ounces
Cas o (US$ )
2,165
2,500Operating cash flow
Free cash flow 47% increase in operating profit to
US$2.9bn1,692
1,500
2,000
Free cash flow from operations1 increased
49% to US$752m 898
1,020
7521,000
NCE margin increased to 25% (US$396/oz)
from 16% (U$201/oz) 139
506
0
500
538% increase in earnings to US$973m -162
-500
0
2008 2009 2010 2011__________________________1. Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less additions to capital expenditure
8
2008 2009 2010 2011
Leverage to the gold price
1,6001,800
Gold Price (US$/oz)
81%
Operating Cash Flow (US$m)
2 000
2,500
141%
1,569600800
1,0001,2001,400 81%
2,1651,000
1,500
2,000 141%
865
0200400
2008 2011
898
0
500
2008 2011
EBITDA (US$m)
3,000
3,500
Net Earnings (US$m)
1 000
1,200
2,9241,500
2,000
2,500 154%
973600
800
1,000
205%
1,150
,
0
500
1,000
319
973
0
200
400
2008 2011 2008 2011
9
Conservative balance sheet and debt strategy
Net debt (US$m) & Net debt:EBITDA ratio (times) Low Gearing
Balance sheet positioned for growth
0.80
0.90
3,000
3,500 Net Debt (LHS)
EBITDA (LHS)
Strong liquidity position
0.60
0.70
2 000
2,500 Net Debt:EBITDA (RHS) Robust cash flow generation
Conservative maturity management
0 30
0.40
0.50
1,500
2,000
Investment grade credit rating
B 3 | P iti (M d ’ )
0 10
0.20
0.30
500
1,000 − Baa3 | Positive (Moody’s)
− BBB- | Stable (S&P)
0.00
0.10
2008 2009 2010 2011-
___________________________________
Committed to returning cash to shareholders
10
Note: * Net Debt to EBITDA ratio for 2011 is calculated by dividing net debt as at 31 December 2011 by EBITDA for the December 2011 quarter annualised. For 2008 to 2010, EBITDA is calculated for the 12 months ended December.
F2011 Dividend
Committed to returning cash to shareholdersDividends (SA cents per share)
CY2008 - 2011 Final dividend: 230 SA cents per share
− 130% up on interim dividend300
350
− 229% up on 2010 final dividend
Full year dividend: 330 SA cents per share250
− 136% up on C2010 dividend
Dividend yield of 2 6%*330
150
200
Dividend yield of 2.6%
Competitive compared to US Treasury rates150
130 140
100
130
0
50
2008 2009 2010 20112008 2009 2010 2011
11
___________________________________* Dividend yield calculated based on closing price of 12700 SA cents per share as at 15 February 2012
NCE margin expansion
1800US$/oz
Q4 2011 NCE margin of 28 % exceeds long-term target
29%
1400
1600Gold Price Total Cash Cost NCE
28%
21%
1000
1200
140021%
800
1000
400
600
Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011
Cost containment allowing the higher gold price to be delivered to the bottom line
12
__________________________Data points are per quarter
g g g p
12
Increasing international diversification
2008 Production1 2011 Production1 2015 Production Target2
20%2% 18%19%
40%
20%
20%
62%18%
2% 18%
49%
22%
10%
20%
South Africa West Africa Australia South America
22%
2015 Production Target2
South Africa Region Australasia Region West Africa Region South America Region
~ 2 Moz ~ 1 Moz ~ 1 Moz ~ 1 Moz
______________________________________________________1. Attributable gold equivalent ounces 2. Five million ounces in production or in development
13
Improving size & profitability of international portfolio
37% 40%2,500
‘000 ounces
26%
32%
25%
30%
35%
2,000
15%
20%
25%1,500
1,5161,802
1,989 1,977
5%
10%
500
1,000
-2%
-5%
0%
02008 2009 2010 2011
_____________________________________________
2008 2009 2010 2011
International production (LHS) International NCE Margin (RHS)*
* Managed productionNote: NCE margin is calculated on a managed basis
14
Creating a globally diversified portfolioArctic PlatinumPre-Feasibility• 12Moz 2PGE + Au
resource• Scoping Study
confirms Platsol®
Producing AssetDevelopment ProjectExploration Project
Creating a globally diversified portfolio
Finland
process• Exploration and
amenability in 2012
Yanfolila Drilling
Woodjam JV Exploration
Canada
Mali
• Potential for 200kozpa starter project
• Scoping study completed
• Large land package
Far Southeast Project
Canada
MaliChucapaca JV Feasibility• 7.6Moz Aueq resource• 100,000m drilling completed• Feasibility study underway
Development decision H2
Far Southeast Project Drilling• Targeting 52 Moz Aueq^
• 8 drill rigs operatingKangare ExplorationDamang Super-pit
Pre-Feasibility
Peru
• Development decision H2 2012
• Large land holding in highly prospective region
PhilippinesMaliPre Feasibility• Super-pit targeting
4Moz*
• Pre-feasibility H2 2012
GhanaSouth Deep Construction
____________________________________________________________________
Salares Norte Exploration
Chile
Taguas JV Exploration
Argentina
South Africa
* Refer to the Exploration Target Statement for the Damang Super-pit Project^ Refer to the Exploration Target Statement for the Far Southeast Project
15
South Deep Project
Capital infrastructure programme on track
World class project management Forecast production build-up (koz)
700800
Ramp up to 700koz run rate end 2015
Project capital development achieved 105% of
planned metres for the year 300400500600700
planned metres for the year
Improvement in de-stress mining
− Q4 2011: 8% 0100200300
2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E− Q3 2011: 23%
Major progress on key infrastructure: on budget and on time
2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E Status
2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E
2010 2011E 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E Status94 Level Refrigeration Plant Commissioned
Twin Vent Shaft Deepening On-track
Tailings Storage Facility CommissionedTailings Storage Facility Commissioned
Plant Expansion On-track
Backfill Infrastructure On-track
New Mine Development On goingNew Mine Development On-going
16
Chucapaca Project: Location
Chucapaca Project in southern Peru
CerroCerroCorona
PERU
Lima
ChucapacaProject
Mi i C iGold Fields94,100Ha
Buenaventura18 400Ha
Chucapaca Project 12,700Ha
Mining Concessions
18,400Ha
17
Chucapaca Project: Resource pit shell
ECCP10-137
September 2011 Mineral Resource Model and Open Pit Shell (7.6Moz Aueq*)
W ECCP10-13762.2m at 5.23g/t Au
from 409.4mSection 950W
CCP11-27425.8m at 2.00g/t Au
from 619.8m Section 1100W
~70% of Resource in the Indicated
Category
7.6Moz Aueq*
Category
CCP11-28975.95m at 3.5g/t Au
450 m
g/t Aueq
Showing Drilling completed to Sept 2011. Mineral Resource completed based on d illi l t d t M 2011
75.95m at 3.5g/t AuSection 1000W
________________________________drilling completed to May 2011
________________________________* The Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.54g/t Aueq cut-off constrained within a pit shell optimised using US$1,450/oz Au, US$3.90/lb Cu and US$27.50/oz Ag. Calculations of Aueq grade are based
on the same price assumptions with no recovery weighting. The Mineral Resource is reported on a 100% basis.
18
Chucapaca Project: Exploration potential
Good exploration potential in the district...W E
Titan Geophysics – Deep Search Ground IP~ 2km
C° ChucapacaCanahuire 2km
Agani
CCP11_41416m @ 0.6g/t
Au
Canah ire one of n mero s targets that ha e potential0 2km
…Canahuire – one of numerous targets that have potential
19
Chucapaca Project: 2012 Objectives
Indicati e deli er timeline
2011 2014E 2015E
Indicative delivery timeline
2016E2012E 2013E
* #ChucapacaˣExplore* Develop^ Construct#Chucapaca
400 to 600kozpa Aueq
2012 Objectives
Complete feasibility study during H2 2012
Submit EIA H2 2012
Development decision targeted for end 2012
___________________________________* Includes all exploration and study-related activity^ Includes all engineering, permitting, long lead orders and pre-construction activity
20
# All construction activity until commissioning and handover to operational teamsx 100% basis
Damang Super-pit Project: Ghana
2.1Moz Reserve for total Damang property (31 Dec 10) Damang Pit Reserve 1 1Moz
Resource and Pre-feasibility targeted for H1 2012
Damang Pit Reserve 1.1Moz Other pit reserves of 0.83Moz
Combine Huni, Juno and Damang pits as a Super-pit
Conceptual model generated by cut and paste of
grade control model
D b 2011 December 2011 Damang Reserve: 62Mt at 1.71g/t for 3.4Moz Damang Resource: 166Mt at 1.9g/t for 10.0Moz
D S it l ti t t* Damang Super-pit exploration target*
80Mt at 1.6g/t for 4.0Moz
Resource delineation drilling programme completed 157 holes for ~38,000m ~40m by ~80m spacing
____________________________* Refer to the Exploration Target Statement for the Damang Super-pit Project in the Appendix
21
Damang Super-pit Project: Pit shell
HuniDamangJuno121 6m at 1 74 g/t Au
Proof of concept drilling demonstrated robust exploration target
180m at 2.42 g/t Au
121.6m at 1.74 g/t Au
270m at 0.95 g/t Au605.4m at 0.63 g/t Au
425.4m at 0.71 g/t Au408.4m at 0.52 g/t Au
143.8m at 3.93 g/t Au348.8m at 1.1 g/t Au g
72m at 0.81 g/t Au
181.4m at 0.51 g/t Au
350 8m at 0 77 g/t Au 401.6m at 1.07 g/t Au
188.6m at 0.62 g/t Au
168.3m at 0.55 g/t Au
350.8m at 0.77 g/t Au
240m at 0.95 g/t Au
300m at 1.32 g/t Au354.7m at 0.83 g/t Au
current pit shell
N 500m
348.7m at 1.06 g/t Aup
drill hole intersectionsurface topographydrill hole trace
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Note: Drilling results are not true width. These drill holes are drilled down the steep dipping stratigraphy to define overall continuity of mineralisation, over more than 3km strike and upto 600m dip extent Individual flat lodes are intersected and demonstrate higher grade mineralisation consistent with currently mined ores.
22
Damang Super-pit Project: 2012 Objectives
Indicative delivery timeline
Explore* Develop^ Construct#Damang Super-pitˣ400 to 500kozpa Au
2011 2014E 2015E 2016E2012E 2013E
p
2012 Objectives
Updated resource model expected in Q2 2012
Complete pre-feasibility study in H2 2012
Ongoing engagement with Ghana authorities on proposed tax changes
___________________________________* Includes all exploration and study-related activity^ Includes all engineering, permitting, long lead orders and pre-construction activity
23
# All construction activity until commissioning and handover to operational teamsx 100% basis
Far Southeast Project (FSE): Philippines
High quality gold-copper porphyry with significant upside potential
Option to acquire 60% interestOption to acquire 60% interest
88 historic holes defined a high grade gold-Far Southeast Project Area
copper porphyry
Established infrastructure in a mining district
Gold Fields initial drilling confirms high grade
core and extends mineralisationcore and extends mineralisation
24
Far Southeast Project: Geology and resource potential
NW SE
EnargiteProd: 1997 to presentProd: 1938 98 Prod: 1997 to present18Mt @ 7.71g/t Au
Prod: 1938 - 9841Mt @ 3.3g/t Au
Far SoutheastA C
1,60
0m
700 Drilling level
Au-Cu Porphyry
*
100 m
500m
Exploration Target*:900Mt at 0.77g/t Au and 0.54% Cu
(52Moz eq) (c/o ~0.8g/t Aueq^)
-200 m
? After Hedenquist et. al. 2002
____________________________* Refer to the Exploration Target Statement for the Far Southeast Project in the Appendix^ Based on the following prices: US$3.74/lb copper, US$1,500/oz gold
25
Far Southeast Project: A world-class deposit
1.60
Gold versus Copper Grade (deposit size in Aueq ounces - scaled by bubble size)
1.20
1.40 Production Feasibility Undeveloped Exploration Gold Fields
Hunchun
Andash
Far SoutheastCerro Corona
1.00
1.20
de (g
/t)
High grade trend
Grasberg
Boddington Ok TediRidgeway
Maricunga
Golpu
Minas Conga
Bystrinskoye
PebbleCaspiche
T
0.60
0.80
Gol
d gr
ad
Almalyk
Sarcheshmeh
NorthparkesKisladag
Maricunga
Oyu Tolgoi
Tampakan
Reko Diq El MorroPebble
Cadia East Mankayan
KSMSnowfield
King King
Galore CreekPeschanka
Talas
0.20
0.40
Bingham CanyonBatu Hijau
SarcheshmehAjaxBougainville
Casino
0.000.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Copper grade (%)
The “Lipson Line” – deposits around the line require specific conditions for development
______________________* * Data derived from MEG and Gold Fields internal sources – Resource and Reserve grades as available, or targeted Exploration grades
26
Far Southeast Project: 2012 Objectives
Indicative delivery timeline
2011 2014E 2015E
Indicative delivery timeline
2016E2012E 2013E
E l * D l ^ C t t#Far SoutheastˣExplore* Develop^ Construct#
4 to 25Mtpa ore
2012 Objectives Underground drilling to recommence in March 2012 Complete initial resource estimate in H2 2012Awaiting Picture FTAA targeted in H2 2012 − Decision to exercise option and final payment of US$220 million
Pre-feasibility anticipated to commence in H2 2012
g(Sven)
___________________________________* Includes all exploration and study-related activity^ Includes all engineering, permitting, long lead orders and pre-construction activity
27
# All construction activity until commissioning and handover to operational teamsx 100% basis
Yanfolila Project: Mali
Scoping a 1Moz to 1.5Moz starter project
Komana scoping study
100,506m RC and DD drilled in 2 years
Good targets within 25km radius of the
Komana deposits
Multiple ore sources feeding a central
3Mtpa to 4Mpta CIL plant
Kabaya South
Solona Solona
Sanioumale West25km radius
28
Yanfolila Project: 2012 Objectives
Indicative delivery timeline
2011 2014E 2015E
y
2016E2012E 2013E
Explore* Develop^ Construct#Yanfolilaˣ180 to 250kozpa Au Explore Develop Construct180 to 250kozpa Au
2012 Objectives
48,000 meters of additional drilling planned for H1 2012
Resource upgrade and optimisation during H2 2012
Commence pre-feasibility study H2 2012
___________________________________* Includes all exploration and study-related activity^ Includes all engineering, permitting, long lead orders and pre-construction activity
29
# All construction activity until commissioning and handover to operational teamsx 100% basis
Arctic Platinum Project (APP), Finland
®
Detailed scoping study completed Q4 2011
Barents SeaSignificant PGE-Cu-Ni Deposits
Layered Intrusive Complexes
Platsol® demonstrated as a technically viable
process Norway
Improved overall project recoveries
On site production of saleable metalsKevitsa
Sakatti Kontijaarvi and Ahmavaara M,I&I Resources
137Mt at 1.21g/t Pd, 0.29g/t Pt, 0.12g/t Au, 0.21% WhiteSea
RovaniemiSuhanko Project
Koillismaa
Sakatti
Cu and 0.08% Ni
Exploration identified potential new depositsFinland Russia
Gulfof
Bothnia
�Kemi Cr Mine
~100Mt potential identified FinlandBothnia
LakeOnega
200 kilometres
30
APP Resource expansion & metallurgical test work
2012 exploration to focus
21,867m completed out of 40,000m drilling programme
Suhanko North
on proving up resource potential of the Suhanko Extension deposits A A’
SUHANKO EXTENSIONS
Konttijärvi
Tuumasuo
SUHANKO PROJECT
Ahmavaara Vaaralampi
31
Arctic Platinum Project: 2012 Objectives
2011 2014E 2015E
Indicative delivery timeline
2016E2012E 2013E
Arctic PlatinumExplore* Develop^ Construct#
Arctic Platinum300 to 400kozpa 2PGE+Au
2012 Objectives
Aim to complete drilling on Suhanko North
Platsol® amenability tests on new resources
Resource upgrade and optimisation H2 2012
Complete pre-feasibility study H2 2012
___________________________________* Includes all exploration and study-related activity
32
^ Includes all engineering, permitting, long lead orders and pre-construction activity# All construction activity until commissioning and handover to operational teams
5Moz in production or in development by 2015
Continue to improve the quality of the portfolio as measured by NCE per ounce
DamangSuper pit
YanfolilaAPP FSE
Current Base*
5Moz either
in production or in
development
5Moz either
in production or in
development
ChucapacaSuper-pit
South Deep
3.5Moz3.5Mozpp
2011 2015 Target______________________* Actual production 12 months to December 2011
33
Thank You
Damang Exploration Target Statement
Damang Superpit Project, Ghana – Exploration Target Statement
The Damang Gold Mine (Abosso Goldfields Ltd) is one of Gold Fields two operating mines in south west Ghana, and currently produces approximately 220-240koz per annum. Following theacquisition (June 2011) of Iamgold’s minority stake (18.9%) in the Ghanaian mines, Gold Fields holds a 90% interest in the Damang Gold Mine, with the remaining 10% interest being held bythe Government of Ghana. The Damang Mineral Reserves at December 31st 2010 totalled 2.1 Moz, with total Mineral Resources of 4.1 Moz from the Damang-Huni-Juno complex, and anumber of other deposits on the Damang mine tenement. Mineralisation is orogenic hydrothermal in style and typically hosted within sediments and lesser mafic units. A component ofconglomerate hosted palaeoplacer mineralisation is also present.
The Damang Project incorporates the combined inventory potential of the Huni-Damang-Juno deposits. Historically these deposits, which form a contiguous zone of mineralisation, have beenexplored and mined as separate deposits. Consolidation and expansion has been limited by (i) the location of the Eastern TSF (ETSF) and geotechnical wall angles, and (ii) systematicnegative bias in the reporting of Indicated and Inferred grade and tonnes located below the current pit shells, as evidenced by historic positive tonnage reconciliations observed after mining.
In order to overcome historical limitations and to develop a “blue sky” basis for a concept study, the following steps were taken: (i) an Extensional mineralisation model was developed whichextrapolated mineralisation based on historical grade control data to a maximum of 280m below the $1,150poz June 2010 resource pit shells, and based on the measured resources andactual mining results from 8 x 5m spaced grade control data; (ii) the location of the ETSF was eliminated as a constraint in the Whittle pit optimizations (i.e., a portion of the ETSF would bemined and relocated to a new TSF facility); (iii) Owner Mining projected costs were assumed for a range of new plant processing options up to 12Mtpa.
The conceptual model was optimised using current mining costs generating a potential single large open pit of over 3.5km strike and hosting between 4 to 6Moz. Two drilling phases firstproved the Extensional Concept (~25,000m diamond core and RC drilling) and then in-filled the potential open-pit inventory to a 80m x 40m spacing nominally adequate for reporting ofIndicated resources (38,000m diamond core and RC drilling). Both drill phases confirmed the extent and style of mineralisation below the existing pit and within conceptual expansion pits isessentially similar to existing mined ores. Modelling is now ongoing aiming to finalise a resource estimate to be used for ongoing studies and evaluation.
An Exploration Target model of >4 Moz based on a conceptual tonnage of 70 to 100 Mt at a grade of 1.5 to 1.7 g/t Au with mineralisation extending beyond the limits of known and conceptualpit shells. Drilling demonstrates continuity of mineralisation to depths of over 350m below current pit floors consistent in style and tenor of current mined ores. Ongoing studies will incorporatethe existing Damang Reserves hosted in the additional satellite deposits (Amoanda, Rex, Tomento, etc) which combine with the Superpit Target for a total potential Damang Mining Inventoryof 5Moz.
The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and is expressed in 100% equity terms. At this point there has been insufficient exploration to define aMineral Resource for this entire quantity and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
35
Far Southeast Exploration Target Statement
Far Southeast Au-Cu Project, Philippines – Exploration Target Statement
The Far Southeast Project (FSE) is an advanced exploration program being conducted by Far Southeast Gold Resources Inc. to investigate and evaluate Au-Cu mineralisation associatedwith the world class, concealed FSE porphyry system in the Mankayan district. The district is located in the central Cordillera of Northern Luzon, 250km north of Manila, Philippines, and israted as exceptional on a global basis for both its gold and copper endowment and abundance of quality deposits. In September 2010 Gold Fields entered an option agreement with LepantoConsolidated Mining Company and Liberty Express Assets to acquire a 60% interest in FSE over a three staged payment scheme amounting to US$340m by March 2012.
FSE is located within an existing mining camp and is in close proximity to two other mines (Enargite and Victoria) historically operated by Lepanto, of which Victoria is in current production.FSE has ready access to established infrastructure, including roads, tailings facilities, power and water, and an established mining community. There is no current declared Mineral Resourcefor FSE, although drilling completed over a number of years indicates the presence of a large, concealed gold-copper mineralised porphyry system. Approximately 118 historic diamond drillholes, dating back to the 1980 discovery hole and totalling almost 52,000 metres of drill core, had been drilled on the project. Of this drilling a total of 88 drill holes intersected a mineralisedzone with approximate dimensions of 900 metres east-west by 900 metres north-south by 900 metres vertical. While grades are variable, the following historic drill intersections are consideredtypical of the mineralized zone: 691m at 2.5g/t Au, 0.9% Cu; 906.8m at 1.5g/t Au, 0.5% Cu; 613.1m at 0.8g/t Au, 0.8% Cu; 733.9m at 0.7g/t Au, 0.4% Cu; and 517.4m at 0.6g/t Au, 0.4% Cu.
Gold Fields has conducted a major underground drilling program since early 2011 aiming to characterise the magnitude, extent, and controls of gold and copper mineralization at FSE, andvalidating the grade, alteration and lithological models which Gold Fields constructed in 2010 from historic drill data. Eight electric-powered diamond drill rigs are drilling underground from the700 level of the existing Lepanto mine. The rigs are drilling fan-shaped patterns of angled holes targeting the mineralization of the FSE porphyry. An initial 30 holes (36,000m) were drilled forProof-of-Concept and Exploration purposes to scope the scale of the FSE mineralised system. Geological logging and assay results returned to date have validated the Gold Fields 2010models. In addition the assay results indicate that lower grade mineralization extends well beyond limits of the original grade envelope, suggesting that significant Au-Cu mineralization is moreextensive than modelled and remains open in all directions The mineralisation has been identified over a depth range of more than 1000 m and a strike extent of more than 1000 m andextensive than modelled and remains open in all directions. The mineralisation has been identified over a depth range of more than 1000 m and a strike extent of more than 1000 m, andremains open in these directions.
Planned drilling aiming to define the mineralisation to a level suitable for resource estimation will total 80,000 to 95,000m in 65 to 80 holes to be completed by H1 2013. This drilling is targetingan Exploration Target of 800 to 1000 Mt at 0.6 to 0.9 g/t Au and 0.4 to 0.6% Cu for 45 to 55 Moz Aueq (assuming US$1,500/oz Au and $3.74/lb Cu). This material is targeted between the+350m to 200m AMSL+350m to -200m AMSL.
The potential quantity and grade of this Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and is expressed in 100% equity terms. At this point there has been insufficient exploration to define aMineral Resource for this entire quantity and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource.
36