getting strategy into the revenue gamestrategy+into+the+revenue+g… · getting strategy into the...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Executive SummaryCompany life spans are getting shorter, cost-cutting initiatives have run their course,
competitive intensity is heightened and entire industries are being disrupted. In the modern
business environment, is strategy really in the "game"? Outside of the strategy organization
itself, there are often misconceptions that strategic planning is a “pie in the sky” function. Worst
yet, strategic planning can be perceived as a “out of touch” corporate function that is know
mostly for hosting annual strategic planning off-sites at fancy golf resorts.
tt Either way, often at the expense of planning for the future, the urgent need for companies
to deliver current and short-term returns can be a dominant force. Under these conditions,
strategic management disciplines in many companies can struggle to consistently
demonstrate value and command the respect that they once did.
tt Addressing critical questions about the future becomes an urgent priority for senior
business leaders and the strategy practitioners that support them. To that end, this note
introduces new, actionable strategic management practices that are designed for the
uncertainty, structural change and complexity of the modern business environment.
tt The core of these practices is about “getting strategy into the revenue game” - reframing
strategy as a portfolio of medium to long-term, horizon 2-3 opportunities that are linked
directly to future revenue and growth outcomes.
tt In our experience, this approach equips strategy executives and practitioners to speak
the value creating language that their companies need in the 21st Century, and that CEOs,
CFOs, Boards and Shareholders really understand and care about.
Getting Strategy Into The Revenue GameHelping growth champions create value in the 21st Century by speaking the
language that CEOs, CFOs, Boards and Shareholders really care about.
BY: WAYNE SIMMONS AND KEARY CRAWFORD
BEST PRACTICE NOTE
2
Filing the void: the business case for strategyAchieving revenue and growth objectives is often the most pressing issue in companies large
and small. According to our research1, 90% of surveyed executives indicate that revenue and
growth will become even more of a challenge amidst macroeconomic uncertainty, structural
change and unprecedented competitive complexity that they are facing.
tt When thinking about future revenue and growth, marketing and sales typically come to
mind first. However, both marketing and sales are inherently tactical and focused on horizon
0-1, current to short-term revenue (0-12 months). Interestingly, these two disciplines are
becoming even more tactical as marketing and sales automation rapidly proliferate.
What often gets lost in the day-to-day leadership conversation is the fact that 70% of a
company’s enterprise value (i.e. stock price) relies on its future growth prospects. Future revenue
and growth is defined as horizon 2-3, over the medium to long-term (e.g. 12-60+ months) rather
than current or short-term performance.
tt When insufficient attention is paid to medium to long-term revenue and growth, companies
suffer from an affliction that we call "revenue blindness" - a lack of visibility into horizon
2-3 revenue that can quickly make companies vulnerable to the structural changes, market
complexity and hyper competition that define the new business environment.
tt Most senior business leaders are intrinsically aware of the essential role that horizon 2-3
revenue and growth play in enterprise value creation. However, the pressures to deliver
quarterly performance and earnings tend to dictate that horizon 0-1 revenue command the
lion’s share of leadership attention and consume the largest portion of corporate resources.
tt Conventional wisdom assumes that all types of revenue and growth are the responsibility of
Marketing and Sales organizations. We argue differently: horizon 2-3 revenue and growth
is about the future, and inherently falls within the purview of executives and practitioners in
strategy and strategy-related fields.
Strategy: Questions about relevance, impact, and valueCEOs, CFOs, Boards and senior business leaders are continuously searching for ways to create
new sources of value. To that end, rationalizing which strategic choices and capital investments
are most likely to generate future revenue and growth outcomes (and thus enterprise value) is
one of the principle conversations going on in the C-suite.
tt Unfortunately, equipped with decades-old, internally-focused competitive advantage,
strategic planning, operational efficiency and balanced scorecard frameworks, strategy and
strategy-related disciplines can often be forgotten in that critical C-suite conversation.
tt When faced with questions about the future, many companies outsource their idea
generation and strategy formulation to outside management consultants.
1 2013 Chief Strategy Officer Survey, The Growth Strategy Co. and Innovation Excellence Ltd.
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
3
However, some are now realizing that these extremely expensive, episodic consulting
“transactions” struggle to deliver tangible results or sustained value to the organization.
tt As affirmation of the negative value perceptions associated with management consultants,
John Abele of Heidrick & Struggles states that, “Consultants were frequently hired to
develop growth plans, but too often these reports ended up collecting dust on the shelf”.
tt Further, as noted in Consulting on the Cusp of Disruption (Harvard Business Review, 2013),
“consulting is highly opaque…consultants rely on ‘social proof’ to substantiate their value”.
In this context, social proof means that the “educational pedigrees, eloquence, and
demeanor [of consulting firms] become substitutes for measurable results.”
tt So, if strategy and management consultants struggle to demonstrate value, how can the
strategy executives and practitioners that hire them show tangible value to their companies?
Case in Point: Global Industrial ManufacturerPursuing revenue and growth opportunities can be a challenge. For many companies, such
as a Fortune 50 global industrial manufacturer that we've worked with, a far too familiar cycle
has emerged: first, Shareholders and the Board expressed concerns about enterprise value
(i.e. stock price) of the company; the CEO and senior business leaders responded by setting
ambitious future revenue and growth targets; engineering and product teams reacted by hastily
developing new products and features that were then handed to marketing to generate new
demand and leads. However, when the sales organization finally tried to convert those leads
into revenue or growth, they find the going tough with slow sales and the original, overly
ambitious revenue targets virtually impossible to meet.
Diagnosis: Not enough focus on the things that really matterAs in the case study above, taking action to pursue revenue and growth can have multi billion-
dollar implications. With significant resources being applied to traditional strategic planning,
product development, marketing and sales, why is the situation in the case study so familiar?
tt From our research and fieldwork, we attribute a large part of this problem to a reactive,
short-term focus caused by the relative absence of specific horizon 2-3 revenue and growth
opportunities and associated risks in the traditional revenue cycle. While this may seem
surprising on the surface, deeper examination shows this pattern in a few key ways.
tt When CEOs, general managers and other senior business leaders set future revenue
and growth targets, they often don’t have a clear sense or specificity of where that future
revenue and growth will actually come from, nor do they factor-in the real world risks and
barriers that may inhibit their ability to capture that future revenue and growth.
tt The lack of focus on generating specific future revenue and growth opportunities, and
the actions needed to capture those opportunities, leads to future revenue and growth
forecasts that lack credibility - built on flawed or non-existent assumptions about such
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
4
strategic issues as market size, market attractiveness, the willingness to pay of prospective
customers, the impact and probability of risks, and levels of competitive intensity.
tt As product, marketing and sales teams engage to meet those, often-baseless, revenue and
growth forecasts, any errors in strategic assumptions or risk identification can cascade down
through the revenue cycle at ever-higher costs and lower success rates.
tt While all of the actors in the traditional revenue cycle seem to be doing their part (albeit
independently), overall results can often miss the mark. With a sustained absence of horizon
2-3 revenue and growth opportunities within the revenue cycle, companies can quickly
find themselves out of sync with customers, markets and demand; falling behind the
competition and consistently missing their future revenue and growth forecasts.
Rethinking the blueprint for revenue and growthWith enterprise value creation (or value destruction) in the balance, what’s needed? Imagine
implementing a "start-up like" entrepreneurial philosophy and practices that are specifically
designed to generate and capture future, horizon 2-3 revenue and growth opportunities – the
essential ingredients for enterprise value creation in the 21st Century.
tt The idea of large corporations or mature companies thinking, acting and growing more like
entrepreneurial start-ups can seem like a fantasy. This is particularly true for companies that
are hard-wired to focus internally on operational efficiency and cost cutting, or those that
are successful in the status quo of the "known world" - trying to extract value from known
customers, in known markets, with known offerings against known competitors.
tt The known world is being replaced by the unknown world of uncertainty, structural change
and complexity. In this environment, the need to become "more entrepreneurial" is no
longer a novelty or luxury - it is an absolute necessity for companies large and small.
tt A more entrepreneurial strategic management approach is the opposite of linear annual
strategic planning or the "all or nothing, bet bet" capital investment approaches that are
common. This new approach recognizes that pursuing multiple pathways to the future is a
better way to capture opportunities and manage risks than a single "bet the farm" approach.
tt Leading global corporations, such as GE and American Express, are addressing the
entrepreneurial imperative by incorporating concepts such as lean startup and real options
valuation into strategic processes. These concepts are built on experimentation and
incremental learning, which provides companies with the agility and optionality typically
found in the start-up world and essential for the new business environment.
tt Absent this type of thinking, revenue blindness can take hold, making future revenue
and growth seem inaccessible and unachievable - hidden by 1) an inside-out perspective
that limits peripheral vision of markets, trends, customers, etc. 2) a focus on short-term
performance that limits over-the-horizon visibility; and 3) an aversion to risks that can
obscure underlying opportunities.
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
5
Idea in practice: Seeing through the fog of revenue blindnessHow can growth champions help their companies and senior business leaders avoid revenue
blindness in the real world? How can the risks of the new business environment be converted
into opportunities for revenue and growth?
tt We strongly advocate that companies implement a new strategic hierarchy that is purpose-
built for the modern business environment. This new framework combines growth
enterprise, lean startup and real options best practices with the action-orientation and
financial rigor needed by large corporations and mature companies.
tt With this new framework, strategy is reframed as a portfolio of specific revenue and
growth opportunities with associated initiatives, risks and risk mitigations, providing
companies with "options” that are predicated on making small initial investments in multiple
opportunities. By doing this, companies buy the "right", but not the "obligation", to make
subsequent investments if warranted by real world circumstances.
Linear ApproachDecoupled from revenue and growth
Agile ApproachLinked to revenue and growth
Corporate Targets
Opportunities ($)
Initiatives
Risks ($)
Mitigations
Strategies
Corporate Targets
Goals
Objectives
Strategies
IMPLIED Link Between Risks and Strategy EXPLICIT Link Between Risks and Strategy
Risks
Figure 1: Blending opportunities, risks, strategy formulation and execution to generate revenue and growth.
tt This hierarchy provides the visibility needed for senior business leaders to excercise options
to invest in the most promising strategic choices and opportunities, or to adjust course (e.g.
keep investing, stop investing, speed up, slow down, etc.) based on experiential learning,
changing circumstances, preliminary customer and market feedback.
tt Companies now have options to make course adjustments in initiatives and risk mitigations
based on changing circumstances. These options provide the agility needed for companies
to exploit opportunities and reduce risks - even in the face of the inevitability of real world
changes (e.g. emerging risks, or shifts in political, economic, social, technical, legal,
environmental factors, etc.).
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
6
Implementation Example
A more strategic view of revenue performance requires companies to go far beyond the
compliance focus of traditional risk management software, and the static nature of conventional
strategic planning software and KPI dashbaords. As an example of these principles in practice,
GrowthCloud® - The enterprise platform for revenue and growth - provides a consistent way for
companies to transform the traditional revenue cycle by providing tools and insights purpose
built to bring visibility to specific horizon 2-3 revenue and growth opportunities and the actions
needed to capture those opportunities.
An enterprise view of strategies, opportunities and risks paints a clear picture of future revenue and growth to help strategists communicate in a way that CEOs, CFOs, Boards and Shareholders really understand and care about
With the enterprise view provided by the GrowthCloud® OPPORTUNITY PIPELINE, strategists
can 1) forecast and view the total strategic portfolio of revenue and growth opportunities, and 2)
view the impact (in financial terms) that risks have on revenue and growth across the portfolio.
The Growth Strategy Company LLC [US]
GrowthCloud® Dashboard
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
7
Understanding the probability, impact and effects of risks on revenue opportunities
tt Risk factors for each opportunity are calculated as the product of the probability of the risk
occurring and the impact that each identified risk might have on the opportunity.
tt With the GrowthCloud® RISK RADAR, each underlying risk can be consistently categorized,
displayed and managed at the portfolio or individual opportunity level based on impact,
probability and size (in financial terms) of the impact.
Using opportunity modeling to evaluate scenarios and portfolio selection
tt As strategists identify and attribute individual risks to strategic opportunities, multiple
financial scenarios emerge to help decision-making, prioritization and capital
allocation decisions.
tt The GrowthCloud® OPPORTUNITY PIPELINE, growth champions have the insights
necessary to develop, model and prioritize the strategic initiatives and risk mitigation
activities needed to maximize the capture of revenue and growth opportunities.
The Growth Strategy Company LLC [US]
GrowthCloud® Dashboard
Powerful, easy to build models and scenarios lead to real options for senior business leaders and better strategic, prioritization and capital allocation decisions.
When individual assumptions and factors are aggregated for a specific opportunity, the
resultant “risk-adjusted” opportunity becomes the new financial basis for decision-making,
prioritization and capital allocation.
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
8
tt Unique, assumptions-based FutureCast models within GrowthCloud® show the forecasted
effect of mitigation activities against defined execution-level stages or milestones.
Opportunity-Risk Models
Visualize and forecast the impact that individual initiatives and risk mitigation action
can have on opportunity realization
tt Capturing the maximum upside potential of opportunities requires that specific actions
be taken. With Initiative-level Models within GrowthCloud®, strategists can build map
initiatives and risk mitigation actions for each opportunity.
tt This capability links specific execution-level activities, milestones and status points into
an integrated FutureCast model that is used to manage strategy execution and selecting
course correction options.
Initiative-Level Models
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
9
Conclusion
The new business environment presents an interesting paradox. On the one hand, there are
elevated levels of uncertainty, structural change and complexity in virtually every industry.
On the other hand, the global marketplace offers significant opportunities to unlock new
sources of revenue and growth. Creating enterprise value in this new environment will
require companies to consistently maximize their capture of revenue and growth opportunities,
while minimizing their downside exposure to risks.
tt When companies focus revenue cycle activities exclusively on marketing and sales, they
limit themselves to immediate to short-term, horizon 0-1 revenue. Led by growth champions,
companies must expand the traditional revenue cycle to also include the medium to long-
term, horizon 2-3 revenue and growth that accounts for the vast majority of enterprise value.
tt Our experience and research concludes that taking a more entrepreneurial approach that
reframes strategy as a portfolio of specific revenue and growth opportunities is often the
missing link for companies to achieve and sustain revenue and growth.
tt Addressing the gap between current revenue forecasts and future revenue and growth
expectations becomes the clear mission and key value creating opportunity for executives
and practitioners in strategy and strategy-related fields.
tt When growth champions (with or without outside consultants) are able to consistently link
their work to future revenue and growth, they are better positioned to communicate in a
language that CEOs, CFOs, Boards and Shareholders actually understand and care about.
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
10
Want to learn more?
Register for the upcoming webinar and see a LIVE DEMO of GrowthCloud® - the enterprise platform for revenue and growth - See how leading companies bring together opportunities and risks with strategy formulation and execution to drive horizon 2-3 revenue and growth.
RESERVE YOUR SPOT
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
11
Self-Assessment: Getting Strategy Into the Revenue GameThe self-assessment is a diagnostic to help leadership teams quickly assess their organizations in key strategic management areas. The self-assessment is designed to help leadership teams: 1) spark candid leadership conversations about risks; 2) identify the state of practice within the organization; and 3) pinpoint and prioritize areas for leadership ideas and action.
How To Use The Self-Assessment:1. Read the Best Practice Note and then gather as a team to review and discuss.
2. Using the self-assessment form, each member of the team should then individually rate each element to determine the company’s perceived positioning, weaknesses (rating of 1) and strengths (rating of 5).
3. The group should discuss the results and generate the necessary leadership ideas and actions.
Self-Assessment
How well positioned are we to achieve and sustain our business growth goals?
WE
AK
NE
SS
STRE
NG
TH
What ideas do we have to take advantage of our strengths and mitigate our weaknesses?
We have clearly defined our strategy in terms of specific revenue and growth objectives.
1 2 3 4 5
We understand the gaps between immediate to short-term growth and our future revenue projections.
1 2 3 4 5
We consistently inform marketing and sales activities with insights from strategic activities.
1 2 3 4 5
We consistently present senior leadership with options as business circumstances change.
1 2 3 4 5
We have replaced questionable “suspects” in our pipeline with
specific revenue opportunities.1 2 3 4 5
We have factored-in risk adjustments to the revenue and growth opportunities that we have identified.
1 2 3 4 5
We consistently use strategy to inform strategic decisions, resource prioritization and capital allocation.
1 2 3 4 5
Our CEO, CFO and Board of Directors are informed about any variances in current revenue forecasts and future revenue and growth expectations.
1 2 3 4 5
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME
12
Disclaimers, Warranties, and PermissionsCopyright © 2014 GrowthCloud Holdings LLC
All Rights Reserved. All text, images, graphics and other materials in this printed material are subject to the copy-right and other
intellectual property rights of GrowthCloud Holdings LLC. These materials may not be reproduced, distributed or modified without
the express written permission of GrowthCloud Holdings LLC. The marks appearing in this material including, but not limited to
logos, emblems, slogans and names are trademarks of GrowthCloud Holdings LLC, its subsidiaries, affiliates and licensors. The
information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. GrowthCloud Holdings LLC
disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such in-formation and shall have no liability for errors,
omissions or inadequacies in such information. This publication consists of the research and experiential opinions of GrowthCloud
Holdings LLC and should not be construed as statements of fact. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without
notice.
GETTING STRATEGY INTO THE REVENUE GAME