geol & geoch rpt on the hawkins ii prop hawkins twp
TRANSCRIPT
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
N.T.S. 42C-15Longitude 84" 05'Latitude 49* 00'
42C16NE8aia 2.9\22 HAWKINS
Geological and Geochemical Report
on the
HAWKINS II PROPERTY
Hawkins Townships
Porcupine Mining Division
Ontario
for
GOLDEN RANGE RESOURCES LTD.
Timmins, Ontario
RECEIVED
UHOS SECTION
010
1 May, 1986 "l . J , NeelandsP.A. StudemeisterR . D . M a a s s
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
TABLE OF42C16NE8212 2.9132 HAWKINS 010C
NoIntroduc t ionSummary and ConclusionsRecommenda t ion sProposed BudgetThe PropertyLocation and AccessTopography and VegetationHistory and Previous WorkGeology
IntroductionLocal GeologyStructureMineralization
GeochemistryIntroducti onTopography and Superficial DepositsSoil ProfileResults
References Statement of Qualifications
T , J , NeelandsP.A. StudemeisterR . D . Maa s s
Table 1
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6
Appendi x Appendix
Dwg. No.H - II - H - II -
III
TABLE
Work History of Oba Area
FIGURES
Location Sketch Claim Map Previous Work Regional Geology Local Geo logy Gold, Histogram
APPENDIX
Rock Samples Analytical Procedures
DRAWINGS
Geology Map Geochemical Map - Gold
Page11-3
34555-77-10-11-12-13-14-15
16-1717-19-20-21
2121-22
23 2323-24 2527
282930
268161826
3132
In In
pocket pocket
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
INTRODUCTION Page 1
This report discusses the results of geological and
geochemical surveys completed during July and August of 1965 on a
group o -F claims, Hawkins II, owned by Golden Range Resources Ltd.
The history, the results of previous exploration and the economic
potential are reviewed. The- conclusions and recommendations are
respectfully submitted and to the authors knowledge complete and
unbiased.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The property is located 24 kilometers south of the village of
Oba which is located at the crossing of the Algoma Central Railway
(A.C.R.) and the Canadian Pacific Railway (C.P.R.}, Fig.1. The
property consisting of 36 LI n paten ted claims is easily occessed by
truck and canoe. The property is underlain by mainly mafic and
felsic flows and tuffs which are intruded by granite. Subsequent
to the intrusion molybdenite-bearing, coarse-grained granitic
dykes intruded the package. Molybenum values range from 11 to 114
ppm and the highest gold value is 790 ppb Au in pyritic felsic
tuff .
The property warrants more work due to the following
reasons :
1) Geology at the Falconbridge-Shenango gold occurrence suggests
; that the mineralization is associated with felsic tuffs which
on Hawkins II forms the core of a steeply dip f) ing syncline,
2) A felsic tuff lens similar to the one at the Falconbridge-
Shenango property contains 790 ppb Au,
3) Molybdenite, an accessory mineral ot Hemlo is present
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1-
50'
LOCATIONONTARIO
DISTRICTS AND
^— . . H inttrnational and Inttrprovincial bourntarits.M..— Ttrritorial District bovndamt... __ . County boundaries.
Sc.le of Mllei
'y,.. .y.,. j____!SL JJO
Ml •S'
CHICAGO
lonpirxrie wt*t from Greenwich 90*
SOLDEN RAN6E RESOURCES LTD.
LOCATION MAP
Moy 1986 j 6.G. C ltd JFlg. l
ll
l
l
l
l
i ll
llllllll
Page 3
thro LI gho LI t the property and is indicative of late-stage
silicification-s mineral event which may have been
contemporancoLis with the appearance of gold at the Shenango
gold occurrence.
4) Though the geochemical res LI Its are low they are not conclusive
in eliminating the potential of the property because soil
development in the topographic, low areas was not well
developed .
RECOMMENDATIONS
More work is recommended to improve outcrop exposure and
sample geophysical and geochemical anomalies. Because the area is
relatively accessible, the use of o backhoe mounted on a muskeg is
recommended. This woLild provide a better understanding of the
stratigraphy and test the following targets:
i) Reanalyze soil samples for molybdenum, copper, orsenic and zinc.
ii) Trench and sample the VLF anomalies and soil anomaly (90 ppbAu} in the vicinity L40W - L52W where ironstone withpyrrhotite and pyrite was located in an old trench.
iii) Though the rock sampling indicated no direct correlation between gold and molybdenum this possibility should be checked by opening LI p the following areas containing molybdenite: L24W, 20+OON; L8E, 13+006; L12E, 13+OOS; and L52E, 1+OOS.
iv} Trench and sample in the vicinity of rock sample numberG-31883 that contained 790 ppb Au {L4E , 16 + 50S). This areais immediately north of the metavolconic-granite contact whichwarrants more prospecting.
v) Trench the geochemical and geophysical anomalies between L36E and L52E at 23+OON.
l ll
If
l l l l l
l l l l l l l l l l
^PROPOSED BUDGET Page 4
Duration - 1 month
Supervision and Assistance
Bulldozer and Backhoe
Mobilization and Demobilization $3,000 15 days 20,000
Trenching (including sampling)
Assaying and reassaying
Camp Co s t s
Con t ingency
Total
#5,000
23,000
15,000
8,000
1 .000
S.OOP
#57,000
l ll
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
THE PROPERTY Page 5
The Hawkins II claim group consists of 36 unpatented claims
(P700184 to P700204 and P700208 to P700212 inclusive) located in
Hawkins Townships in the Porcupine Mining Division, Fig- 2. The
claim group encompasses an area of 1440 acres and illustrations of
these claims are updated currently and sold by the Ministry of
Natural Resources as Plan No. G-2316, Hawkins Township. With the
filing of this report for assessment purposes the claims will be
in good standing until 14th of March, 1967.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The claim block is located near Oba, a community at the
junction of the Canadian National and Algoma Central Railways, 225
kilometers (140 miles) west of Timmins, Fig.1. Oba is reached
from the Trans-Canada Highway (No. 11) by heading south from
Hearst along Highway 583 for 40 kilometers and then 73 kilometers
along a connecting gravel road. A good grovel rood leads south
from Oba to the Oba River, Fig. 2. During the surveys a tent camp
was set-up at the Oba River and travel to and from the property
was by canoe and by foot along the railroad track. The A.C.R.
track crosses the western part of the property. The area, one
mile to the northeast of the property on the Falconbridge ground
has been logged over and would prove as an avenue for accessing
equipment.
TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION
The relief on the property is relatively flat and becomes
progressively more swampy in the center around a westerly-draining
l l l l li
i~,fPii
lv ——
*700-1700- 700- 1700- | 7OO- . 7OO-—— ! 208 ! 204 203 i 202 ' 201
-7 -0CK (TOO- 700- TOO- l TOO-94 19
— ' H- 00- l 700- 700-1
— i- —— L ^-^- — —l — -- 70O- ' 700- 1 7OO-
183189 ^188^^-187 l 186 I8S l——— --
TOO-1 TOO" l TOO- 1 TOO- 1 TOO- 'TOO- 700- 1 TOO- 1"i. IT4I 176 IT6 ITT j IT8 j IT9 j 180
GOLDEN RANGE RESOURCES LTD
CLAIM
DATE: [DRAFTED BY: l SCALE : APRIL, 1986 l S. CASE l l"*IX2mile
i
l
Page 7
creek. Maximum relief is estimated to be 9m and drainage is to
the west towards the Oba River which crosses the northwest corner
of the property. The swampy areas contain cedar and minor spruce.
Elevation of the Oba River at the campsite is approximately 329
meters above sea level. A gravel pit located near the campsite
may be the product of glacial outwash or part of the Oba River
drainage system and as such would be a hinderance to soil
sampling.
HISTORY AND PREVIOUS WORK
Gold was reportedly first discovered near Oba in 1923, three
Kilometers north of the Hawkins I Property, Table 1. Subsequent
exploration led to the discovery of additional occurrences
(Gledhill, 1927; Maynard, 1929). A few gold occurrences, e.g.
Shenango Gold Mine, have a brief record of gold production between
1930 and 1940, Fig,3. Gold occurrences are in a sequence of mafic
to felsic metavolcanic rocks, approximately along strike of the
metavolcanic sequence underlying the Hawkins I Property.
Since 1983, Falconbridge Ltd. has been carrying-out
exploration programs on and around the old Shenango prospect.
The Northern Miner magazine reports that "a volcanic-sedimentary
horizon similar to that at Hemlo has been traced, trenched and
drilled shallowly along a strike length of two miles. This
horizon is gold bearing along its entire length, locally the grade
rises to subeconomic levels over minable dimensions, but ore
grades have not been discovered over significant strike lengths.
Limited deeper drilling is planned for 1986".
RIO TINTO^ B-1
RIO TINTO B-2
Longdon V 1 Lokt
Little Walt
SOUOSEPH
SHENANGO GOLD MINES (Au, Ag)
EXPLORATIONS
TAYLOR LOCATION/ (Au.Cu.Pb) 4
FALCONBRIDGEjLongdon Sto,
Ground*iXPLORATIO
GOLDEN RANGE RESOURCES LTD,
PREVIOUS WORK
APRIL, 1986 l S . CASE FIG.
i
l
l
Table 1 .
DATE OF WORK
1923 1925 1936-3?
1938-40
1936-37
1937-381938-39
1936-37,1945
Feb-Mar 1973 Jan-Feb 1974 Sept. 1974
Feb-Dec 1974 Mar. 1975
Feb-May 1979 Jan-Apr 1980
Sept 1979-Nov
June 1980
WORK HISTORY OF OBA
COMPANY NAME-TOWNSHIP
G. Taylor-Hawkinsli
Hiawatha Gold Mine-Lizar
Shenango Gold Mine- Hawk ins
Magi Gold Mines-Hawkins t*M
Rio Tinto-Hawkins i
St. Joseph-HowKins it
1981
MacDonnell Prop.-Hawk ins
Aug-Sept 1983 McKinnon/March ResourcesDerry-Ermine-Hawkins
May-Aug 1983 Falconbridge-Hawkins/Walls Gervais Option
June 1983 Feb 1984-Jan 1985
June 1983- Falconbridge-Hawkins Mar 1984 Walls Dec 1983-Mar 1984 Feb 1984 June-Sept 1984
April 1985 Winter 1985
Winter 1984 Golden Range ResourcesHawk ins Twp.
Summer 1985 "
AREA Page 9
WORK PERFORMED
Gold DiscoveryDiscovery Claim StakedGold Mine Developed forProduct ionIntermittent Mining ofGoldSmall open pit, 90'audit,40'cross-cutting,52'ShaftTrenching G 4000' D.D.New vertical shaft 20'drifting,6'cross-cutting50 Ton/Day Mill,2400 Tons Milled,66 oz . Au/37 oz. AgI.P. SurveyMagnetometer Survey3 Diamond Drill Holes
Magnetometer Survey 2 Diamond Drill Holes
VLF and Mag. Surveys VLF, Mag. and Horiz. Loop Surveys Geological Mapping
Plugger Work and Trench Cleanout
Airborne Helicopter EM, Mag. and VLF
Rock and Humus Geochem
I.P. Survey27 Diamond Drill Holes
Rock and Humus Geochem.
Magnetometer SurveyDiamond DrillingGeology,VLF,EM,Rock andHumus Geochem.GeologyDiamond Drilling
Magnetometer G VLFSurveysGeology,Soil and RockGeochem. Surveys
i
Page 10
Gold was first discovered in Hawkins Township by G. Taylor in
1923 while he was timber-cruising in the Oba area. In September
of 1925 the discovery claim SEM 4310 was staked approximately 3.2
Kilometers east of Langdon Station.
The Shenango Mining Company was the first company to
commercially develop a Gold property in Hawkins Township, Fig- 3.
A small open pit was sunk on claim SSM 4332 in 1936-37 in the
central part, of the township 1.2 kilometers east of Langdon
Station. A 50 ton/day amalgamation mill was constructed in 1936.
In 1937 a 27m adit was driven from the bottom of the open pit
followed by 12.2m of cross-cutting from the adit and later a 15.9m
vertical shaft was sunk. In 1937-36 the company also conducted
trenching and 12.9m of diamond drilling. In 1938-39, a second
vertical shaft wes sunk to on estimated depth of 38m with 6.1m of
drifting and 1.Bm of cross-cutting also carried out. The location
of the shaft was probably O.B kilometers west of the earlier
workings. The company milled 2400 tons and recovered 66 oz. of
gold and 37 oz. of silver from the property during the
intermittent operation of the mill in 1936, 1937 and 1945. The
gold and silver were recovered from quartz veins in mafic
metavolcanics.
The Hiawatha Gold Mine was developed for production in the
same period 25 kilometers southwest in Lizar Township on
Kabinakagami Lake, Siragusa, 1977. Production was intermittent
from this property for three years. Operations ceased in 1940.
i
ft
i
Page 11
Magi Gold Mines was the first of many companies in recent
time to examine the Au and base metal potential of the Oba area.
A claim block was staked between Dubroy Lake in the south and
Little Watt Lake in the north consisting of twelve claims
(P329323-26, P329331-38) by the company and an T,P, survey was
conducted between February and March of 1973. This was followed
by a magnetometer survey in the winter of 1974 and 3 diamond drill
holes in September of 1974.
Rio Tinto conducted an exploration program on two claim
groups in Hawkdns Township between 1974 and 1975. The first
group, B-1, consisting of eighteen claims was located
approximately 0.8 kilometers west of Langdon Lake (P388707-24).
The second group B-2 consisting of 8 claims (P388525-29) straddled
Hawkins Lake in the southwest corner of Hawkins Township. A
magnetometer survey was performed on the two claim groups between
February and December of 1974. This was followed by two diamond
drill holes on group B-1 in March of 1975.
St. Joseph Explorations, now Novamin Resources was the first
company to conduct a geological survey on a claim group in Hawkins
Township. Their property consisted of 39 claims covering the area
between Langdon Station and the eastern boundary of Hawkins
Township and Walls Township (P473491-500, P514501-10, P514575-93).
Their exploration program on this group began with a geological
survey conducted between September 1979 and November of 1981.
This wes followed by geophysical surveys consisting of
i
Page 12
electromagnetic and magnetometer survey between February and May
of 1979 and electromagnetic and magnetometer, and horizontal loop
surveys between January and April of 1980.
An airborne electromagnetic, magnetometer, and V.L.F. (very
low frequency) helicopter survey was performed on approximately
221 claims in Hawkins, Ermine and Derry townships by Aerodat for
Don McKinnon and March Resources between August and September of
1983.
Falconbridge has conducted an extensive exploration program
in the Oba Area since 1983. The company initiated their
exploration program to examine the apparent stratabound nature of
gold occurrences in Hawkins Township. The company staked and
optioned 425 claims in Hawkins and Walls townships consisting of
162 claims optioned from Daryl Bremner, 77 claims optioned from
Larry Gervais and the remainder being staked by Falconbridge. The
first phase of the exploration program consisted of collection of
1273 humus and 271 rock samples for geochemical analysis between
June 1983 and March of 1984 along claim lines using 1:15840 aerial
photographs for control. Rock geochemical results ranged from <2
ppb.- 85 ppb. Au, with four prospecting sample assays of 37, 9900,
and MOOOO ppb Au. the background value for humus samples was 1-5
ppb., with anomalous values of 24, 31, 32, 80 and 99 ppb Au. The
geochemical results outlined an anomalous gold zone which extended
east along strike the entire width of the property and warranted
further work. Falconbridge compared their results to the
anomalous geochemical results obtained as a result of hydrothermal
i ii
i
iil
i li l i
Page 13
alteration associated with the Madsen and Sterratt Olsen An
Deposits of the Red Lake area.
An induced polarization survey was performed by the company
on a portion of this ground known as the Gervais Option in June of
1983 and a magnetometer survey was performed between December 1983
and March of 1984. In February of 1984 drilling began on both
Falconbridge claims and the Gervais Option. Twenty-eight diamond
drill holes had been filed for assessment by January of 1985.
Falconbridge followed up their 1983 work by further
geochemical sampling, geophysics including electromagnetic and
V.L.F., and a geological survey in the summer of 1984. Further
geology was performed by the company in April 1985.
WORK COMPLETED
Golden Range Resources conducted V.L.F. and magnetometer
surveys on two claim groups in Hawkins Township in the Winter of
1984. The northern claim group known as Hawkins I, consists of
36 claims (P709501 to P709536) and is situated 5 kilometers west
of Langdon Lake. The southern claim group the subject of this
report contains a number of anomalous situations. Excerpts from
the geophysical report prepared by H.Z. Tittley, are as follows;
Magnetic Survey results-
"Ironically, the volcanic rocks through most of the belt
across the property, appear less magnetic then the adjacent
granites and the boundary both to the north and south is .generally
represented by the 600 isomagnetic contour line."
These lows are in part caused by felsic tuffs which from the
lPage 14
extent of the lows may continue the length of the property.
"A strong magnetic anomaly along the south part of the belt,
in the eastern part of the property, is probably due to mafic or
ultramafic flows."
No explanation was located to explain this magnetic high but
sulphide/oxide ironstone may be another source.
"A narrow magnetic band which extends from 21+OQN on L44E to
the railway at 8+OQN on L32W is probably due to a mafic flow
similar to a weaker band running from 3+OON on LS2E to the most
southerly reading on L36W."
Outcrop underlying these bands are mafic tuff and mofic tuff
with felsic bands.
"Except for the southwest corner of the property, many of the
remaining short anomalies ore due to northwest-trending diabase
dyKes, the most prominent of which extends across L18W on the 25N
tie-line and 10E on the 25S tie-line. Further east, a dyKe
extends across 7+OON on L28E and 28+005 on L44E, and another,
through L24E, 26+OON and S+50E on tie-line 25 south."
None of these dyKes were put on the geology mop, not because
they don't exist but because no diobase was found to underly the
anomalies. At present the anomalies are not explained.
VLF Survey results-
Tittley (1984) interpreted some 19 anomalies labelled 'A' to
'S'. These have been put on the geology mop. Some of these bands
may be due to graphite horizons in the mafic tuff. Some
conductors including 'P' and 'Q' boorder the mofic-felsic contact
iil
i
i i
Page 15
and continue to the northeast which reaffirms the hypothesis
suggested by the magnetic data that the felsic horizon continues
the length of the property and narrows at the east end. A VLF
anomaly between L44W and L52W at 15+QOS if extended along trend to
the southwest, passes near an outcrop of laminated tuff with
cherty bands containing 10 to 3B^o pyrrhotite and pyrite. Tittley
concludes by recommending areas of low magnetics for further work.
This would include the area underlain by felsic tuffs.
The geological survey was completed between 15 July and 10
August 1985. Personnel involved with the survey were os follows:
J. Ferguson Geological Assisstant London, OntarioJ. MacDougal Geologist London, OntarioT. Neelands Geologist Timmins, OntarioP. Studemeister Geologist Chicago, Illinois
Mr. R. Maass of Timmins, Ontario completed the assessment reseorch
on the property.
GEOLOGY
INTRODUCTION -
The only map covering the area is a compilation by P.E.
Giblin at the scale of 1-inch to 2 miles which was completed in
1965, The area immediately to the west of Hawkins Township has
been mapped by G.M. Siragusa and released as Geoscience Report
159, Siragusa, 1977. This report covers the western portion of
the 'greenstone' belt. The belt consists of a major metabaseltic
series with subordinate felsic metevolcanic end metosedimentary
units, Fig. 4. Metagabbro, metapyroxenite, and minor
me taperidot i t e are locally associated with the mafic
iNH
l
l
i
l i
l
l
i i
L E G E N.,D
10 j DIABASE
9~1 6AMITAGAMA
5 j FELSIC IGNEOUS AND —-1 METAMORPHIC ROCKS
4 l MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC ——l IGNEOUS ROCKS
3 l METASEDIMENTS
2 j FELSIC METAVOLCANICS
~i~l MAFIC METAVOLCANICS
GOLDEN RANGE RESOURCES LTD.
REGIONAL GEOLOGY
jScole l": 4 miles lAPRIL, 1986 Iscole l": 4 miles | F l G. 4
i
Page 17
metavolcanics . All these rocks were intruded, metamorphosed under
amphibolite -facies conditions, and locally assimilated, by
trondhjemitic intrusions. Subsequently, both the supracrustal and
the granitic rocks were intruded by numerous nor thwest-1 rending
and some northeast and nor t h-1rending diabase dykes. According to
Siragusa (1977), fine-grained interbeds of felsic metavolcanics
occur within the me t avolcan ic s. The felsic interbeds are in sharp
contact with the mafic me t avolcanics and commonly vary in
thickness from 10cm to 1m.
In the western part of the belt, quartz hosts both the gold
and sulphide mineralization and, in turn is hosted by:
1) Silicified and sheared mafic metavolcanics
2) silicified and sheared felsic metavolcanics and
3) at the contact of felsic and mafic metavolconics.
From the literature available it would appear that the
Falconbridge-Shenango occurrence is similar to the No. 2 host
described C above) by Siragusa, 1977.
LOCAL GEOLOGY
The Hawkins II Property is underlain by an east trending
Archean sequence of mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks in the
upper-greenschis t to lower-amphiboli t e facies of regional
metamorphism, Fig. 5. These rocks have been intruded to the
northwest and southeast by granite. Molybdenite occurs in
granitic veins and felsic lenses, and gold occurs in e pyritic
felsic bed. Outcrops of the Archean bedrock are less than 596 of
the surface, with most of the bedrock covered by vegetation and
l l l
LEGEND
4 l Diabase
jQ Granitic Intrusives
~2~] Felsic Metavolcanics
~T~1 Mafic Metavolcanics
GOLDEN RANGE RESOURCES LTD.
LOCAL GEOLOGY
TDRAFTED BY: Is I S. CASE l
DATE: |ORAFTEDBY: ISCALE: APRIL, 1986 l S. CASE | l"* 1/2 mile
ll
l l l l(1l l l l l l i i i i i
Page 19
sandy sediments of Pleistocene age.
Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks
Mafic metavolcanic rocks are dark green to brown-green, fine-
to medium-grained assemblages of amphibole ( hornblende) ,
plagioclase, epidote, biotite, and accessory quart?, sphene,
magnetite, pyrite, and pyrrhotite. The mafic rocks were broken
into three types in the field: laminated tuff, laminated tuff
with felsic bands, and laminated tuff with cherty bands.
Laminated tuff (Unit la) is a massive to gneissic amphibolite
with wispy, discontinuous laminations bearing variable amounts of
amphibole, epidote, and biotite. The laminations ore generally 3
to 5-mm thick and strike east to northeast parallel to the
regional structure. Quartz veins, generally less than 25 mm ( 1
inch) and occasionally up to 0.3 m ( 1 ft) wide, occur parallel to
the laminations; a few veins are discordant to the laminations.
Laminated tuff with felsic bands (Unit 1b) consists of brown-
green bands of hornblende * biotite -*- plagioclase, brown bands of
epidote -*- plagioclase * quartz. The felsic bands constitute up to
SK to 10 07o of the rock, and are up to 0.3 m (1 ft) thick. Quartz
vein, most concordant and a few discordant to laminations, are
abundant. The laminations in Unit 1b are thicker (generally 5 to
50-mm thick) , more continuous along strike, and better developed
than in Unit la.
Laminated tuff with cherty bands (Unit 1c) is a well banded
rock with massive bands of quartz, felsic bands to quartz +
plagioclase H- mica, and abundant mafic, bands of hornblende -i-
l:
i
l
l
i ii iii i i i i i i i
Page 20
epidote -*- biotite. Mineral assemblage includes hornblende,
plagioclase, biotite, white mico, epidote, quartz, almandine
garnet, magnetite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, graphite, and carbonate.
Only two isolated outcrops of Unit le we r'e encountered on the
property. One outcrop is near a trench at L56W, 17+QOS and
consists o-f laminated tuff with siliceous layers bearing 1 Q^i to
355o pyrite plus pyrrhotite. The other outcrop is at L31W, 10 + OON
and consists of laminated tuff with dark micaceous and light
siliceous bands bearing up to 1/6 to 39i pyrite; bands are up to
0.3 to 0.6-m C 1 to 2 ft) thick. Both outcrops are thought to be
derived from siliceous chemical sediments of volcanogenic origin.
The strike extent of each of these units is not known due to
overburden cover.
Felsic Metavolcanic rocks
Felsic metavolcanic rocks are grey, fine- to medium-grained
C 1 to 2mm range) assemblages of plagioclase, quartz, epidote,
white mica, biotite, and accessory chlorite, magnetite, and pyrite
up to 0.5/6, These rocks are dacite in composition, mafic mineral
(predominantly biotite) content is 5?6 to 1594, and banded. The
banding consists of light gray bands of quartz -*- plagioclase
alternating with dark grey bands of epidote * mica * plagioclase.
The bands locally display small folds and crenulation s, the
deformation someplaces confined within undeformed bands. Measured
fold axes dip gently to the north or south as exposed at the
southwest corner of the property. Quartz veins generally less
than 0,3 m f 1 ft) wide ore common and locally abundant; both
l"
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Page 21
discordant and concordant relative to the banding were observed.
Felsic me t a volcan i c rocks are interpreted to be derived from
dacite tuffs.
Granite rocks
Granitic rocks ere grey, medium-grained (2 to 3 mm range)
assemblages of plagioclase, quartz, potash feldspar, white mica,
biotite, and accessory epidote, chlorite, hornblende, pyrite, and
magnetite. The mafic mineral (predominantly biotite) content is
tl 5^o to 15% by volume. The granitic rocks are massive to gneissose
in texture, and trondhjemite to granodiorite in bulk composition.
Granitic rocks are abundant at the southeast and northwest
corners of the property where an inferred intrusive contact trends
northeast. Dykes of granitic rock in the mafic and felsic
metavolcanic rocks were observed throughout the property,
STRUCTURE
The banding in the mafic and felsic metavolcanic rocks
strikes east to northeast and is approximately parallel to the
gneissosity. The foliations dip south at the north end of the
property, but generally dip north at the south end, This pattern
suggests a structural syncline whose axis trends northeast and
crosses the low-lying area between the two main ridges on the
claim block. The exact position of the inferred synclinal axis is
speculative because outcrops along the low-lying area are scarce.
MINERALIZATION
No economic concentration of gold or molybdenite were located
l li ll l l llll l l l l l l l l
Page 22
though indications are encouraging enough to warrant more
development of the anomalous zones. Sixty-one rock samples were
collected for analysis and those containing greater than 10 ppm
molybdenum and 25 ppb gold are listed below.
Samp l e Number
H543 549554555803910
4001 4003 G-31879-31683-31894
Locat ion
LO, 25+OON L28W, 20+OON L24W, 20+OON L24W, 20+OON L36E, 3+50S L32W, 8+30N L8E, 3+QOS L12E, 10+QOS L24W-20+50N L8E-16+50S L52E-1S
Description
amphibolite, mafic tuff amphibol ite granitic vein + MOS2 mafic tuff -f grn , -*-MoS2 q . v . in mafic tuff granite d yKe, MoS2 granite dyke, MoS2 granite dyke, M o S 2 gronite dyke, MoB2 felsic tuff, pyrite felsic tuff, q.v. MoS2
ResulMoppm
1 116182121230967461 14
tsAuppb
510101045515B2079010
Molybdenite Occurrence -
A Molybdenum occurrence at L24-28W, 19-21+OON consists
of 4 shallow pits, stripped outcrops and 2 trenches. Less than 1 !4
molybdenite flakes and 194 to 3% pyrite occur disseminated in
quartz veins, granitic dikes and felsic tuff hosted by mafic
laminated tuff {Units 1a and 1b). Quartz veins and granitic dykes
in outcrops are up to 0.3 m (1 ft) thick and have sub-parallel
foliation. Only a few veins and dykes encountered in outcrop ha ve
trace molybdenite. In general the molybdenite occurs in quartz in
mafic and felsic tuff and granitic dykes, though it is most common
in the coarse-grained (pegmatitic) granitic dykes.
l l l l
l l l l l l l l l l l l l
Page 23 GEOCHEMISTRY
INTRODUCTION
During the geological survey 1015 soil samples from mainly
the B-Horizon were collected every 31 metres on lines spaced 122
metres apart. Three weakly anomalous gold areas are recommended
for more work.
TOPOGRAPHY AND SUPERFICIAL DEPOSITS
The Hawkins II Property is underlain by an east trending
Archean sequence of mafic and minor felsic metavolcanic rocks in
the upper-greenschist to lower-amphibolite facies of regional
metamorphism. Outcrops of the Archean bedrock are less than 5% of
the surface area. Most of the bedrock is covered by vegetation
and sandy sediments of Pleistocene age derived from the reworking
of fluvioglacial deposits.
Maximum relief on the property is estimated to be 9 m (30
ft) . The low-lying areas are generally swamps of spruce, cedar,
and alders, whereas the dryer ridges hove mixtures of conifers and
hardwoods. The Oba River crosses the northwest corner of the
property flowing south and a small creek draining most of the
property flows into it at the north end of the property.
SOIL PROFILE
The thickness of soil over the property varies from less than
0.3 m (1 ft) on some ridges to tens of metres or more in low-lying
areas. Three types of soil horizons were identified below the
humus topsoil, a superficial brown cover of humus, organic debris,
and minor fine sediments. The A-Horizon is o fine-groined, ash-
l
l
l
li
l
l
l
l
i i i i i
i
Page 24
grey, sandy-silt up to 0.3 m (1 ft) thick. The B-Horizon is a
fine-grained, orange to yellow-grey, sandy-silt up to 1 m (3 ft)
thick. The C-Horizon is a fine-grained, grey, sandy-silt of
unknown thickness.
The complete sequence of soil horizons is not everywhere
developed. Many areas hav/e one or more of the soil horizons
missing; contacts between adjacent horizons are generally
gradationel. Areas with a thin soil cover (e.g. many ridges.)
generally have a humus topsoil followed down by A-Horizon, B-
Horizon, and bedrock. In low-lying areas (e.g. many swamps),
bedrock is covered by thick humus topsoil with or without an
intervening C-Horizon. The B-Horizon is a zone of oxidation and
in some places contains material derived from the weathering of
local bedrock. The bulk of the sedimentary material in the soil
horizons, however, does not appear to be locally derived.
Samples of soil were collected with hand-held augers and grub
hoes which permitted sampling to a maximum depth of 0.5 to 1.0 m
(2 to 3 ft). The A- and B- Horizons were sampled except where
these soils where not developed, in which case then, the C-Horizon
was sampled. Soil samples were collected at every 31 m ( 100 ft)
on a grid of parallel lines spaced 122 m (400 ft) apart, except
where humus topsoil exceeded 0.5 to 1.0 m (2 to 3 ft) in thickness
or where soil was not developed, Dwg. H-II-2. Boil samples were
dispatched for gold analysis to Min-En Laboratories, North
Vancouver, British Columbia. The analyses were analyzed by atomic
absorption after digestion in acid, Appendix I.
ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
RESULTS Page 25
Gold content in the 1017 soil samples collected ranges from 3
ppb to 40 ppb Au with median of 5 ppb Au, Fig- 6. The mean is 7
ppb Au with standard deviation of 3.9 ppb Au. Background gold
content in soils of Hawkins Township is uncertain; however, soils
on the Precambrian Shield generally have 1 to 15 ppb Au. If we
consider the threshold value for the date to be the mean plus two
standard deviations, x, t - 155 ppb Au, then only 2% of soils are
slightly anomalous in gold content.
The distribution of these slightly anomalous soils on the
property is erratic but weak clusters do occur. Three are listed
below.
Anomaly Location Gold values in ppb
1 L44E, 17+OOS 30, 152 L36E-44E, 21+OON 30, 20, 20, 153 L40W-18S 90
Anomally 1 is underlain by granite and may result from
auriferous quartz veining.
Anomally 2 is underlain by laminated mafic tuffs with felsic
interbeds. A VLF anomaly is coincident with this anomaly which
parallels the ridge. This may indicate the presence of an
auriferous shear zone.
Anomaly 3 is south (down-ice) from a possible conductor
containing pyrrhotite and pyrite. The nearest outcrop on strike
is felsic tuff.
li il
i
i i
Page 26
BOLD HISTOGRAM FOR HAWKINS II DATA
m
111l1111111
RE 100-L A -TI 80- VE
60- PE -R C 40EN -TA 200 E,
X nw
[
N ' 1015
______________ 1 ————————————————————————————————————————— —11111111111
3 10 20 30 40 50
Au, ppb
Figure 6
l l l l l l l l
r flB
?
ll l l l l l l l
REFERENCES Page 27
Tit t. ley, H . Z . ( 1984)
Giblin, P.E. (1968)
Gledhill, T.D. (1927)
Maynard, J . E . (1929)
Siragusa, G.M. ( 1977)
Giblin, P . E . 1966)
Maynard, J.E. (1929)
Report on geophysical surveys on Hawkins I group, Golden Range Resources, Hawkins Townships.
Notes on Mineral Occurrences, Hornpayne Sheet, O.D.M. Misc. Paper 20.
Gold East of Langdon Station, O.O.M. Annual Report, Vol. 36, Pt. 2.
Oba Area, O.D.M. Annual Report, Vol. 38, Pt . 6.
Geology of the KabinaKagami Lake Area, Geoscience Report 159, Ministry of Natural Resources.
MAPS
Hornpayne Sheet, O.D.M. Preliminary Map P-476, Scale 1:126,720.
Oba Area, O.D.M. Map 38C, Scale 1:126,720.
Resident Geologist Office, Obsolete Claim Maps for Hawkins Township, Timmins.
Ealconbridge Ltd. (1984)
Falconbridge Ltd. (1984)
Falconbridge Ltd. (1984)
Golden Range Resourcesf 1984)
McKinnon, Don ( 1983)
MacDonnell, Angus Prop.(1980)
Magi Gold Mines (1973)
Rio Tinto Exploration (1975)
St. Joseph Explorationf 1979)
FILES
ResidentT-2630.ResidentT-2764.ResidentT-2802.ResidentT-2604.ResidentT-2635.ResidentT-1963.ResidentT-2223.ResidentT-1667.Re s iden tT- 1957,
Geologist
Geologi st
Geologi st
Geologi st
Geologist
Geologi st
Geologi st
Geologi st
Geologist
Office,
Office,
Office,
Office,
Office ,
Office,
Office,
Office ,
Office ,
Timmin s,
Timmins,
Timmins,
Timmins,
Timmin s,
Timmins,
Timmin s,
Timmi ns,
Timmins,
l l l l l l
Page 28
l l l l l i i i l i l l
Statemen t of Qualifications
I, T.J. Neelands, of the City of Timmins, in the Province of
Ontario, hereby certify that:
1. I am a Geologist and reside at 392 ToKe St., Timmins, Ontario.
2 . I am a graduate of Carleton University with a BSc. in Geology.
3. I have practiced my profession as a Geologist since 1971.
4. I am a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada and a
Associate Member of the Association of Exploration Geochemists
5. This report dated 1 May 1986 is based on work and observations
made during the summer of 1985 on the Hawkins I Property.
6. I have no direct, indirect or contingent interest in Golden
Range Resources, the Hawkins I Property or in the securities
of Golden Range Resources Ltd., nor do I intend to receive
any interest.
7. I hereby consent to the use of this report in a prospectus or
in a statement of material facts relating to the raising of
funds .
May 1, 1986 . J . Nee lands Consulting Geologist Global Geoscience Consultants Ltd Timmins, Ontario
l l Page 29
I, Paul Alexander Studemeister, certify as follows with
respect to the report on the Hawkins I Property:.
1. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley in
l 1977 with a B. A. degree {Geology}, and then from the University
m of Western Ontario in 1982 with a Ph.D. degree (Geology) .
2 . The geological survey was cerried-out with the assistance of
Mr. T, J. Neelands and junior assistants.
lB This report is respectfully submitted,
l ]O(JL A-
May 1, 1986 Paul A. StudemeisterConsulting Geologist, Ph.D
l
l
l
l
l
li
l
l l l l l l l l l
l l l l l l l l l
Page 30
I, Randy 0. Maass, of the city of Timmins, in the Province of
Ontario, do hereby certify that:
1 . I am a geologist with an Honors BSc. , in Geology from Brock
University in St. Catharines.
2. I have been involved in mineral exploration for various
companies for the past six years.
3. I am an associate member of the Geological Association of
Canada and a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy .
4. I have no interest, direct or indirect, nor do I expect to
receive such interest in the properties or securities of
Golden Range Resources.
5. This report is based on research of assessment files at the
Ministry of Natural Resources in Timmins, Ontario and facts
obtained from pertinent publications.
Respectfully submitted,
~V
May 1, 1966 Randy D. Maass, HBBcGeologist
l l l l ll
ll• Appendix I
Hawkins II Rock Sample Results
l
l
l
l
l
Page 31
l
l
l l l l l l l lll l l l l l l l l l
ROCK SAMPLES - HAWKINS I
Samp le No .
H-529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555801802803
H-901902903904905906907908909910400140024003
Location Description
L22W, 21+OON amphibolite + quartz veinL32W, 8 + 50N amphibolite, A-M . T .L32W, 8 + 50N A., 370 pyrite, pyL48W, 4 + OQS Felsic, F. gneiss * q.v.L52W, 8 + QOR F. gneiss, S-5% pyL60W, 25+OOS banded F. GneissL56W, 17+OOS pyrrholite + pyL36W, 19+OON amphiboleL36W, 11+OOS F. T.L36W, 24+OOS A.L44W, 9 + QON Grn dyke in GrnL40W, 13-t-OON F. T.L40W, 7 + OON A.L4W, 25+QQN A.LO, 25+OON A.TL 25N, 10+OOE banded A.TL 25S, 16+OOW A.TL 25S, 8 + OOW Grn,L8W, 20+OOS A.L28W-L24W, 20+OON F, T., q.v.L28W-L24W, 20+OON A.L28W-L24W, 20+OON M. T. * F. T.L28W-L24W, 20+OON Q.V,L28W-L24W, 20+OON M. T. + F. T.L28W-L24W, 20+OON GrnL24W, 20+OON Grn + q.v., MoS2L24W, 20 + OON M. T. 4- gm, py, MoS2L20W, 23+OOS M. T.L40E, 23+OON M. T. * F. T.L36E, 3+50S q.v, S M. T.L12W-21+OOS amphibolite, q.v., 1*4 pyL12W-21+OOS felsic dyKes, q.v.L12W-21+OOS q.v. 8 contact M. T., F. T.LO-17+OON amphiboliteL12E-23+OON amphiboliteL12E-23+OON F. dykeL12E-23+OON q.v.L12E-13+30N F. T. * M. T.L2E-7+50S graniteL32W-18+30N grn dyke, MoS2L8E-13+OOS grn dyke, MoS2L8E-13+OOS grn dykeL12E-10+OOS grn dyke, MoS2
Re-Moppm
121141111111221 1B2
29252211IB2110221121121121230196
suitsAuPpb
5105B55155510551055155
10555105510105104555105555510515105
l l l lll l llll1.1i l l l l l l l
Cont'd. Hawkins I, Rocks
Sample No. Location
G-31873318743187531676318773187831879318803188131882318833189131892318933189431895318963189731898
L28W-21NL28W-20NL28W-14NL28W-1342SNL24W-11+80SL.24W-3 + 40SL24W-20+SONL24W-20+50NL20W-19-t-OOSL8E-15+20SLBE-16+50BL52E-6+50SL52E-6+5QSL52E-4+OOSL52E- 1SL52E-BLL44E-1+50SLO-15+50SLO-18+25S
Description
quartz vein, q.v.•felsic,F. dyke -t- pyrite,p ymafic tuff, M.T.float, q. * granite, grnsugary q.v.glassy q.v.Mo -t- py mg r n. dykesilicified felsic dykeF. dykeq.v. at contact of F. dykeqossanous felsic sill, pygranitegrn vein in grngrn vein * q.v,F. lens * q.v.F. lens * q.v.grn. vein, muscoviteF.T., 3% py with maficsF.T. * M.T. minor py
Resul t s Mo Au ppm
11117412161121 148211
B551051020515107901510101055105
l
l
l
l
l
l
lM Appendix II - Analytical Procedure
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Page 32
lF
l
l l l
t
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
PHONE 980-5814
MIN-EN Laboratories Ltd.Specialists in Mineral EnvironmentsCorner 15th Street and Bewicke
705 WEST 15TH STREETNORTH VANCOUVER, B.C.
CANADA V7M 1T2
GOLD GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS BY MIN-EN LABORATORIES LTD.
Geochemical samples for Gold processed by Min-En Laboratories Ltd., at 705 W. 15th St., North Vancouver Laboratory employing the following procedures.
After drying the samples at 95OC soil and stream sediment samples are screened by 80 mesh sieve to obtain the minus 80 mesh fraction for analysis. The rock samples are crushed and pulverized by ceramic plated pulverizer.
A suitable sample weight 5.0 or 10.0 grams are pretreated *with HN03 and HC104 mixture.
After pretreatments the samples are digested with Aqaa Regiasolution, and after digestion the samples are taken up with25% HCl to suitable volume.
Further oxidation and treatment of at least 75% of the original sample solutions are made suitable for extraction of gold with Methyl Iso-Butyl Ketone.
With a set of suitable standard solution gold is analysed by Atomic Absorption instruments. The obtained detection limit is 0.005 ppm (5ppb).
iB'HONE 980-5814
l *" MIN-EN Laboratories Ltd'
lll lm
ll l l l l lh i i i i
Specialists in Mineral EnvironmentsCorner 15th Street and Bewlcke
705 WEST 15TH STREETNORTH VANCOUVER, B.C.
CANADA V7M 1T2
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE REPORT FOR ASSESSMENT WORK -26 ELEMENT ICP
Ag,Al,As,B,Bi,Ca,Cd,Co,Cu,Fe,K,Mg,Mn,Mo, Na,Ni,P,Pb,Sb,Sr,Th,U,V,Zn___________
Samples are processed by Min-En Laboratories Ltd.,/.at 705 W. 15th St., North Vancouver Laboratory employing the'following procedures.
i..After drying the samples at 95OC soil and stream, sedimint samples are screened by 80 mesh sieve to pbtain the minus 80 mesh fraction for analysis. The rock samples are crushed by jaw crusher and pulverized by ceramic plated pulverizer.
1.0 gram of the samples are digested for 6 hours with HNO3 andHCIO, mixture.
4 , ' ^ i ' .After cooling samples are diluted to standard volume. The solutions are analysed by Computer operated Jarrell Ash 9000ICP. Inductively coupled Plasma Analyser. Reports are formated by routing computer dotline print out.
Ministry^ Report of Works^^.^Geochemical and Expenditures)
42CI6NE8212 2,9123 HAWKINS
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days, (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
Days perClaim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
PtCANCELLED
ed on Claim(s)
:ulation of Expenditure Days Credit
Total a Total Days Credits
15
nttructlonsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report "of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix Number
100/li
Too 171
7-c-o t
•700/21
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
A—Z; 0.* -',
O .4?
P ~2.
loo ;
~7
7
clams coveredby this report of work.
Date Approved ai Recorded
Expend. Days Cr.
l hereby certify that l ha've a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Datfe Certified by (Signature)
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement
Filc^
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) Township or Area Claim Holder(s)^
Survey Company.jPL-V^t--*^ Author of Report ^ ^1^ ^j t x^p oAddress of Author ], Q. iJJ
Covering Dates of Survey_i.'
Total Miles of Line Cut___l ^
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer.—--Radiometric——-Other——————
DAYS per claim
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATE:." "//A^thafiSf Report or Agent
t/
Res. Geol. ________ Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date
^is^nClaim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
.P...(prefix) (number)
00M.J
"loo 1*5
looi
..le*?..'.
^00(9^
TOTAL CLAIMS.
837 (85H2)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations—————————————————————————Number of Readings -
Station interval ______________________________Line spacing________Profile scale_________________________________________.-..—-—-
Contour interval ^
Instrument ——yH Accuracy — Scale constant —^———Wj? Diurnal correction method -—..—---^5! Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ———
O
2;O
N
*™-l
2Q W U D Qz;
Instrument
sssW Frequency.iJ (specify V.L.F. station) W
Parameters measured.
Coil configuration ——.——-^-—--———-,-————^^-———---————.......,-.————^________
Coil separation _____________________________________...,..—..——————-——--.—A ccura cy __________.—__-__ -___.-________________-. -._..........—————————-^—--————.
Method: CH Fixed transmitter Q Shoot back d In line CD Parallel line
Instrument
Scale constant —— Corrections made.
O Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy———————
Instrument ———————————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain
On time __________________________ Frequency —————
- Off time ___________________-——————— Range ————————
— Delay time ^-^-
— Integration time.
Electrode array ———
Electrode spacing —
Type of electrode —
SELF POTENTIALInstrument.___________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ^--—-——--—^^--———^^--————--—--——-—.^^-—-^.^------—-—-—----.
Corrections made.
RAlMpJVIETRICInstrument.--——Values measuredEnergy windows (levels)________________________________________
Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count.
Size of detector—.——.--——--^^-—^—.^^—^^-.———^-^-————————————
Overburden _____________________________________________(type, depth — include outcrop map)
QTIJKRS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—-———————^——————-^——-——
Instrument _________________________Accuracy^^..^^.---———-.-..^-—.^..-.-..^..^-^.^-.^^.Parameters measured.
Additional information {for understanding results).
Type of survey(s)
Instrument(s)(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy-————————..———.———{specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used ____________ -—.—^-..——^-—^—^.^^-—-^^^
Sensor altitude-
Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude______,.__M.__________.__________Line Sparing, Miles flown over total area____.-___—._______________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken. P "7 DO 20*? 4b
Total Number of Samples. Type of
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight Method of Collection-
U
Soil Horizon Sampled Horizon Development Sample TVpth 0.*5M-p
Terrain-
Drainage
Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis*-- \
General ^BJU
Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.
n
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Koofc
Others
oj As,-(circle)tt
Field Analysis {^Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__
Field Laboratory Analysis
No. ___________Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used___
Commercial Laboratory {~Name of LaboratoryJ-\LQ. Extraction Method—lAifii Analytical Method. "**Reagents Used C3 d*-^. ̂ ^A'v *v ^
V O
General.————————————————
.tests)
-tests)
tests) U4
(jjfj^^^ff^ J J GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS LTD.
100 l
loo 197
loo
^o
loo ^ \
1 06X0 f
P.O. Box 1304 TIMMINS, ONTARIO P4N 7J8 (705) 264-0030
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Notice of Intent for Technical Reports
July 31, 1986
2.9122/87/86
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on the record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted directly to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
July 31, 1986
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Your File: 87/86 Our File: 2.9122
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at (416) 965-4888.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Encl.cc: Golden Range Resources Inc
189 Preston Street Timmins, Ontario P4N 2N4
Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario
r
ili 1 t*'
f,..
"p
•jr: 1 '
f
iK
l(Si:
1-
t: f.is K
1
11 "
.
f"
;i
| 1 '
1.
i'-'.s
r
"t1
.V
x— v Ministry of Technical Asse YV'J Northern Development ,. f , . ,, WJ and M\nes Work CreditsOntario -^
ssment FII* ? QI??
July 10, 1986 ^woRK'TlLED^^ 0
Rtcorded Holder
fid! DFN RANGF RF^nURCES INCTownihlp or Area
HAWKINS T^WN^HIPType of survey and number of
Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical
Elortrnmagnntir. days
Magnetometer -l... . , days
Radiometric; . Hayt
Induced polariystinn riays
Other . days
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
20
16
Man days | | Airborne l l
Special provision | | Ground l l
Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
[~1 Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
P 700174 to 204 inclusive 700208 to 212 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
828 (85/12)
© Ministry of Technical Asse Northern Development ... . ^ and Mines Work Credits
Ontario 4fc
ssment FH* 2.9122
Date Mining Recorder's Report of
July 31, 1986 Wor" 0 ' 87/86
Recorded Holder
BmnEN RANGE RESOURCES INCTownship or Area
HAWKIN^ TOWNSHIPType of survey and number of
Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
20 Geological days
Gfiorhemifia! ib riays
Man days | | Airborne [~l
Special provision [ | Ground |~~]
| | Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
| | Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
P 700174 to 204 inclusive700208 to 212 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims| | not sufficiently covered by the survey ( | insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.
May 22, 1986 File: 2.9122
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins* OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
We received report*, and maps on May 11, 1986 for Geologies! and Gt'ocheinicel Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 700174, et al, in the Township of Htiv/klns.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.
We do not have a copy of the report of work which is normally filed with your office prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario MM 1W3
Telephone: (416) 965-4868
AB/mccc: Golden Range Resources Iric
189 Preston Streetlimmins, OntarioP4N 3N4Attention: Peter G. Hunkln
July 31, 1986 Yours Files: 86/86, 67/86 Our Files : 2.9121. 2,9122
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development end Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
RE: Geological and Geochernlcel Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 709&01 to 36 inclusive, P 700174 to 204 Inclusive and P 700208 to 12 Inclusive 1n the Township of Hawkins
Please disregard the two letters of approval dated July 10, 1986. The Reports of Work had not been received by this office when the above-mentioned surveys were assessed.
These surveys have been reassessed and Notice of Intent Issued.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, 6th Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
DK/mccc: Golden Range Resources Inc
189 Preston StreetTimmins, OntarioP4N 2N4
End.
July 10, 1986 N6 REPORT OF WORK FILED File: 2.9122
Mining RecorderMinistry of Nor them Development and Mines60 Wilson Avenuetimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
RE: Geological and Geochemical Surveys on Mining Claims P 700174, et el, in Hawkins Township
The Geologic el and Geochomical Surveys assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement haiebfeeonapppowdd as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
O.C. Smith, Supervisor Kining lands Section
Whitney Block, Cth Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario H7A 1W3
Telephone: (416) 96S-4B8B
SH/mccc: Golden Range Resources Inc
189 Preston StreetTimmins, OntarioP4N 2N4Attention: PC-to r G. Hunkiri
Attached
Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario
August 18, 1986 Your File: 67/66 Our File: 2.9122
RecorderMinistry of Northern Development end Mines 60 Wilson Avenue Timmins.i Ontario P4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Rt: Notice of Intent dated Ouly 31, 1986 Geological and Geochemical Surveys on Mining Claims P 700174, et al, 1n Hawkins Township
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims end so Indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section
Whitney Block, Oth Floor Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
SH/mccc: Golden Range Resources Inc
189 Preston StreetUrnnlns, OntarioP4N ?N4
End.
Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 6 Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario
Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No -?. 7/^2-C.
TYPE C' :URVEY
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
iSignature of Assessor
Date
&L&C'/.y
itV"" S/l vX
i/ X S•rt l/ iX
86 •X
99l/
es l/rt t/
l t/iX t/l/ iX T/
w iX it96 J Kli /a i 'k.
X /VY 'C'
Q
FRANZ TV-/RV, V
-4-
i
X v^\ [^
\\
\ V
- - iX M* 40 c.
.ZO82O
ip * P IP'920819 .920818 . 920BI 7 r9208:6 '^920815 | K 920814 ' ^920813^ 1 P 92O8|2 Iff
p 'p l p IPf , 932901 92Z9O2I 9229O3^,,o ,
\ L- i -J--.
p "Tp .T T- i p n
922904, 922905' 922906 J 923101 [ 923102 j 923103 [9231O4 J923IO5 ' 923106
' 1 I ^ ! i ! lt.P
"p ~^n p 'P920821'' 92O822 92OB23 920828 ^092 l P \ ' 9\?
M P ,P 'p p ip p o'l 920840 1920839 920838 1920837 , 920B36 .920835 f 920834 '920833 | P
l
9-20841 l920842 j 9Z0843
ri 922912 922911 92291O
29I3 922914 922915
r9229O9! 9229O6j 9229OT
I l
X
923112 923111 l 923110 l 923109 ' 9231O8 * 923IO7 :/
922916 j 922917 922918 |923II3 '923114 l 923115 , 923116 j 923117 I 92f 3118 j
\____l___ ^ f L̂ __l__ \___J_ J - ^ l ^ - i\ l Ip ~~l p T ip |~~~l~~~ — 1~~~,~ ~~I~~~~]~ ~J/" — 4 — — — ~ ™"" '922923 , 922922 1^922921 , 922920 | 922919 (923124 | 923123 J 923122 f 923121 L/S23I20 1923119
. f . . . ( , ffi i
1920844 . 920645 '92O846 , 92O847 920848 920*849 ,-)920B50| 92 i , l ' . A ! i*e\
|P | p 'P IP 92O860 920859 ! 920858 | 92O857 P920856
—i\
h ' . r11—-'' i - - —i - — T-s^ ---— L- — - -L. - —
920880 i9Z087fl
l '/' !
-f-.
k ' !920881 |92080^ l 920883 l 920894
86-^525 SeoTsr1 860737
20855 |920654 920853 | 920B \52 1 920851i j t V i-— -j- — — 4-— — -i-- J,,* ^ ,JL.20866 1 920867 1 920868 | 920B69" l 92087(Sl ' ' IL"'' 'i
| | j ^-L
20875^920874 J 920873 ' -920872" 920871
f 1 1 ' |
zo886]p ! p r^ ^ ~np~~~1 92O887 | 920J88 ' 920889f ' 920890
1 t ' f 'i ' i ]
- - J. 1 1 fi
1 f 1 92293* 19229351 "' 1
J J 1P^~ ~ T ~ ~ ~
j 922937 , 92293B
'1
l- -\ - - -l — — —9a?*4ft 1922947
1 P fp ~ "~ "~ 922949 l 92295O
li i
, 922934 | 92293
1 1-t - — — -L — — .
J 922939 i 92294
1—— -J— ̂
922946 , 922^*;
— ̂ xTP~ ~ "~ ~ jT ~ ~ 922951 . 92295.1
1
922929 922930 "923125 923126 923127 | 923! l 923129 ^23130
,*sH^2294J
320894IP
; 920892i~'iJ ^0891 92296D | 922959^922958^8*^957- i F
.4u-
922954 923149 923150
l
~l
888673 l 888674"! 688675 ("886676 ^88693 ' B88694
888672 l 888671 '886678,8886771888692 .888691 p
^ _-i7r -j——— - 1-.———T'7o.5.ziW" f7095"f7'95"' 80 '03 i
860523
709524 709523
088669 l 88867O l 888679,886680 ] 888689 ,888690 7709513
88B668 ' 888667 '886682 '888681 . 888668 ' 888687 PT09^|2 | 709511
709515
l 709510l
"70S516: 70^517-U
R |P ,p698313 ^983741698375 | '6983^2Z| 698363 |
i T 2 V ' l ill-———— ^^T ^ , ' ' \ l ^""p—*i p"~^?~ ~:\^^^^r9~- -L-.--i-- - - J- --i-i--,, j-\___1 -^/r,l 698382 ' 69Slft^ i *ttA-*tfrT"^ c aa IQI l *no,— l - — -.. t p . .P iP T*-^ ^ p v
\
923151 1923132] ^23153 l 923154~
.923158 923157 , 9^3136 923155 l
j 69839! l 698398 l'898399 [""698406 ^698407^698311
1^ 688995
698315 i 698372 n^k69837716983^1696385,698388^^
l A 698404 698409 698412 l 688*99 l 688994 l 688991 ' P6 98326
886669 1888666 '888683 '868664 .888665 l 886686 p709501
868664 l 888663 l 689080 | 68^081 "T 88*)088 . 889999 889598 j 889597869596
PT09569f P709506
———"^""^[1299 |9lS300|8997|j , 1915298 I 915^^^ | | |
.1—i—L/IJ402 0698403 l P6984IO l ^"j59B4il | P6890OO ^686993
~ ! W ^ i i i '698325
860542 i 764930 j 76493. j ^ 1^06 fit39'J9O~6740~r9 o7947906942 j 906943 906944 J9O6.99 ^06200?"}0*945*
J -U'H o QI IR n^isAAiK'ii i888661 ' B88662 j 889083 ' 669082 l 889087 l 889158 889157 ' 889156 \ 68M
t , l l '' j l l l
^-^L.--^- . 4- - - -L ___L __ -l aafl.66O ' 888659 l 8890941 889085 j 8B9O86 j 869151
. 906194 906195 " 906927 ^906928 | 906929
906935 ,906934 9O6933 l 9O6950l9O6949
906930 , 90693. 906932 1 932OO7 '932006"
906948 906947
9,32005 932004
— i ^ — - ]-/^. - ! —— ^i_ - — .1^ — U— -J — — J-—— ^—^ —..869152 [889(53 1^89154- .915256 | 915255 l 915254 . 915266 .915269 1915276 ' 915279 /l 913286 /9I5289
,906.92 906,91 906190 90*9^8 | 906925^26^;
rT-^ ' i i ' ^ i : i i i s i ; i!-—xj—— ' -.,— . l L...i——— L^ 4 . ,. . ' ...u l___J____\---^__L.-J--..k-j 888657O 888658 ' 888611 l 888622 l 808623 l 888635 | 888636 | 8X8649 . 688650 | 915257 ' 913258 915239 l 915265 | 915270 \ 915275 ^15280 l 91528^1 915290 "
i W ' ' l i ^ i ' ! 'i j^* i ' i i i /\ i i i i i l
906187 906188 906189 j ^906915 | 906916 '906917 . * i l
906923 .9069221 906921 , 932008*^32009 l l l l
~ — — l— — — l- - — - - - - 906918 i 906919 | 906920 J 932015 | 932014 |
i i !
9320.0 9320M
932OI2
886*01 '8866tp J 888612 .888621 l 888624 ' 896634 1*88637 1886648
.T
888651 1915262 | 915261 1915260 l 9152641 915271 , 91^274 , 915281 '915284 (9.5291 1915294' \\
r i ! L.-^
6186 906185 9O6164 |^069I4 ' 906913 '906912 906911 |906910,
888602 '888609.888*13.8886201888625 '888633 888638 l 888647 B8B652 890158 890187 i 8901*8 | 913263 915272 lt.5273 9.5283 ! 915292 ' 915293
- 1906909
906183 1.906903, 906904 9069455 9069O6 t 906907 [sOeloa |
i l
-y — — —
8886O3 1868608 (888614 886619 , 888626 l 888642 888639 i 888646t+J
888653J 8901*9 , 8/90166 . B9OI69 | 89OI76 . 89OI77 T^OlsVxafl^BI , 890270 r890269 ' 890258 l
--J. -Lyl- — ~ — — -* — — — -p. —— — -i. - -T. — "T l, l
J. l888640 l B88645 888654 | 890160 l 890165 890170 ' 890175 ' 690178 ' 890183 , 890280 ' 890271 ' B9O268 890259
l — - - ^ I., _ -^.-i— — - J. — — _ ,- _ -^ ' - — — . j 888605 1888646 , 888616 l 888617 ' 88862 B^ 888630\ ir1 i i r^
l 5" ! l l li.
—— -- |--—— U -- - 688641 , 686644 688655
i i l- ; i ; i i .l_--L _.l. __ J _ l--—'---L---U-^L--., 890164 l 890171 | 89OI74 ' 89OI79 l 890182 ' 890279 l 890272 ) 89O267 l 89O260
l ! l l ' ' l 'i j /i ! ' j j . l931245 '9,^1236 , 931235 ,93I226 | 931225 | 888629ij 888642 | e~8Ze*43 | MSesT' B^oTeT 8Tol6"3~"l "a 90^17B
._^"r5™..1__i,..J.....i *931244 ^931237 ' 931234 l 931227 , 931297 I
O |89OI8I l 89O278 l 890273 . 890266 89O26Ili' \ i l
l 931238 931233 '931228 | 931296
93^)290 ^'931289 j 931282 L93I28I ' 931274 ~J 931246 19312 (̂,J l̂|S4
**s '?^ i- -^'
\L^ 931288 l 931283
)- -* — — r~— — -H — — — -t — — — -f- — — --i ——-— t- — — — -l—- - — -i — -1^931242 j 931239 1931232 | 931229 931295 | 931292 '931287 | 931284 931279 9^1276 '9*1248
1 ! r 1 i i ' '! i ' ! ! i4-- -L
931241 , 931240 i 931231 { 931230 ' 931294 93IZ93 l 931286 l 931283 931278
'3*1*5 ( l ^s^f '--'62 l 890277 l8902 'I-- —-r- - -l .
931260 , 931263 ' 1 U- - - (-
890262
56 i 931259 931264
r L931250 ' 931257 , 931258 931265 931266 . 931269,' 931270
78U61 [781162 78.165—————— -TT ,———— ——— J . ———— ———— ^——— ' ^^ ————
p j p TP781160 l 781163 [ 781164
r
690276 i 690275 ' \B90264|
l,___ J,___. (931267 '931268
899716 l 899719 l 899720 , 899721 ' B99722 1 899723l l
l p I P l rl 781158 i 781159 'l l l i: i l
7/^8^9/^79
l
f 4'? V
42CI6NE8212 2.9122 HAWKINS 200 IRVING TWP.
CO
REFERENCES
AREAS WITHDRAWN I SPOSITION
M.fl.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY
S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
M.-*- S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
^ ip t Km Ordar No.
J"CUPINe Ml MtMQ DIVISION
ffliGim- i 1986
i ree ".i Le ucu
HIGHWAY AND ^OtTE No
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS
SURVEYED LINESs. BASE LINES ETC
LOTS MINING c. AIMS PARCELS ETC
LQTL'NeSPAfl r [ L BC" 'NDA'vMIN NG Ci AiVS t "C
RAILWAY AND 3 :GHT --f AAY
L' T ILIT "r LiNt S
SON PERENNIAL STREAM
C LCOC "••iO "R rLCT.^A*", ":GH~3
SUBDIVISION OR CGMPCS'TE PLAN
RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MAPSHOR MUSKEG MINESTRAVERSE MONUMENT
n !o O f ̂ ' i P ̂ P n p K" ja brLnL;i:
TYPE OF DQCUME NT
PATENT. S^HPACE 8, ViMNC P'-GHT . SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY. ... , MINING RIGHTSONLY .....
LEASE, SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS " .SURFACE^IGHTSONLY.....
MINING RIGHTS ONLY .......
SYMBOL
H l
COUNCIL
^ A \ O fr G "- " V C L , .. . . . . . .. . . .
NOTE M i *4iNCj 3i 'j"* T s NPAa^tLS^"'-*' ^"o-a'-iMA1913 Vt ST D M QR'~, *-A L 'i " e -- t^ 3 - '-t . .. ~ LANC5 ACT ^ S O '9"0 CHAP J60 Si- oj SogStC
SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
4OOO
TOWNSHIP
HAWKINSM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
HEARSTMINING DIVISION
PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
ALGOMA
MinistryofNatural Management
ResourcesOntario
DiliMARCH 3, i983
G-23IS
o o ~? r^ UU6b
19b3 OQSt?
18U3 OOfrfr
!Sb3 00017
!Sb3 009E
19b3 OOZE
19b3 Q08Z
!Sb3 OOfrZ
18b3 OOOZi
18b3 009
1SU3 00
18b3 OOt-t
183M
183H
1S3M OOZS
1S3M 0095
H3 0091?
HI n L f t?
1SH3 oon
i 19b] 009E
1SH3 OOZEm in ui W) inlolm in In in m
ISH3 Of
SU3 OOfZ
Sb3 0002
9b3 0091
..Sb3 002119U3 00
\ ;193M 008
183M 0091 S3M 0091
183M OOOZ
193M 0017Z
1S1M OOZE I93M OOZE
IS3M 009.E 193M 009E
183M jnnt? i
1S3H 008^
183M 0009
83M
93M OOZ
H 1S3M OOZG
193M 009S
0009
ct:CD
o oLD (XI
o
o o oCM
o
o oin
31
O
O O O
T
O
o oLO
UJ
UJ COcrCD
CD CO
O CDLO
CD CO
Oo o
O CO
o oLO
CD CO
O O O CNJ
CD CO
Ocr-
V 'X
'\
<ro
o.
x ̂ *O o.O Q.LU O l
O CO
Q
O lQ
oUJ
tnUJo
tt:LU CO
o
tt: o-j0- XUJ
G (U CU
Q
Z
UJ
oo UJo i o -J
Uj i(o
O
tt (tO CQ
oU. LiJO Q:
(X
Uj-J OD
x ^Jtt
CO^ oO QC
O
tZ
to * o oo:
uO>2wO UJco 9LU
m
CO WQ Qz zCD
O
UJ U.
CO
O (E
ffi
(tUJz oI h-
u. u.li. U.13 D
y Q Q QZ UJ w UJ
-J Z Z Zo ^ ^ ^:* i c lH -J -I -lUJ
O -Q o O — — — li.
en -J oCD
t/)
< u o ~
crLU
OLJ Q
trUJ
Q UJOz
u
Q UJa: acUJ
UJa:(TUJ
O(/l i/l
o
QZ
rs, h- cr
CD O
o
z. oo
-J (/) *x
x u** o
oQ -l-l OO uj
t/) K
Oz zUJ
l/-*
LJ O
zLUcrut^O O O
UJt—t-Oro: tr
Nt - UJ
O Z
\
^\o^ Q(D
ctZJo
cc o
(TXCL
LU oZ LUa: CL.oCJo O
SZJ ZLU Q CO
Os
z o
oo
CO
trUJ CD3ZJ
UJ
C/l
a. x o^ (Tz oUJ Ktt ^ —t- O u.
O
oQ. O
ino 5
OUJ LU (P O
x oin
V)U UJ o^ O D t/)Q Q Q- *j
— CL ain otr tt
t
Q
-J i
O) ; LU l OctID O
LU i:
UJ
< i
or
zUJ Q -1 i O
- z -, inh- J
\ 1
x*- t o
^^x f ^^* -^
O rx : iVi "y -*— 1 A f-3
1 Ci "" 5 '- 0-"3 !
0 S *'"S '
uj ' jo iz D-
-: - 'os i o o s5 5 r K ^'^^ ^3 j"~^ *- OJ - T31: ^ ^ -oi ^ ;i o Ti 'T;
a. t— (x ti-j oo
52 E
48 E
44 E
40 E
36 E
32E
28E
24E
20E
I6E
x i r
56 W
60W
O)
x
on
TOCoo
>
O LIJ
I
Qai
— w