rpt on geol mapping/prosp/geoch samp - …...follow-up level geochemical surveys (fortescue, 1983)....

2.59*8 MOLSON LAKE 010

REPORT

ON THE

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, PROSPECTING

AND

GEOCHEMICAL SAMPLING

OF THE

THE THREE BOOS CLAIMS

TB 613970, TB 613971, TB 613972

AT HEMLO

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

June 22nd, 1983 P.O. Box 2028 Wawa, Ontario

T.R. Foster Geologist

' : 1933

MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD..

This report may not be reproduced in whole, in part, or in summary without the written permission of Manwa Exploration Services Ltd.

4TABLE OF CONT

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

HISTORY

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

PROPERTY GEOCHEMISTRY

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATE OF COSTS

REFERENCES

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

e.saee MOLSON LAKE

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure l:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

LOCATION MAP

CLAIM MAP

GEOLOGY

GEOCHEMISTRY

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Summary of anomalous mineralization.

Table 2: Summary of relative proportions of soilhorizons sampled in survey.

Table 3: Statistics.

Table 4 Frequency Distribution of Elements.

PAGE

l

l

4

4

4

6

12

13

14

15

2

3

Pocket

Pocket

7

8

9

10

010C


This report may not be reproduced in whole, in part, or in summary without the written permission of Manwa Exploration Services Lit}.

SUMMARY

This report deals with geological mapping, prospecting and geochemical sampling done on the three Boos Claims at Hemlo, Ontario, as a follow-up of earlier magnetometric and VLF-EM surveys conducted during March-April, 1983.

The geological mapping and prospecting indicate that the property is underlain by a sequence of felsic metavolcanics, garneti ferous metasediments and graphitic and pyritic cherty metasediments which strike southeast and dip northeast. These have been intruded by a foliated granodiorite. Quartzo-feldspathic veinlets are common. Mineralization occurs as disseminated and stratabound pyrite and pyrrhotite.

Geophysical conductors are interpreted to be caused by concen trations of iron sulphides in the metasediments, possibly at a contact with felsic metavolcan!c rocks.

Anomalous concentrations of zinc and copper have been found in rock samples near the geophysical conductors, though no anomalous precious metal values have been obtained. Soil geochemistry indicates that anomalous concentrations of base metals and gold are associated with geophysical con ductors. Rock units including graphitic and cherty metasediments and sulphidic metasediments correspond to geochemical anomalies.

INTRODUCTION

Geological mapping and rock and soil sampling have been completed on three unpatented mining claims in the Molson Lake Area near Hemlo, Ontario. The three claims are numbered TB 613970, TB 613971 and TB 613972 and are

owned by Mr. B. Boos of Vancouver, British Columbia. The work was done by T.R. Foster, assisted by R.G. Reid, R.M. Worona and T. Calvert, for Manwa Exploration Services Ltd. under the direction of Mr. J.T. Neelands. The purpose of the work was to follow-up previously conducted VLF-EM and mag netometer surveys and investigate base and precious metal possibilities.

The mapping was done on June 2nd and 3rd and soil sampling was carried out on June 3rd, 6th and 7th, 1983. Ten rock samples and approxi mately 120 soil samples were collected and sent for assay and geochemical

____________________________ MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.


B. BOOS PROPERTY

CORONA To Hem lo O REBODY

B. BOOS

LOCATION MAP

LITTLE

C EDA R

LAKE

MOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP N" G-603

B. BOOS

CLAIM MAP

FIG.2

analysis. The soil sampling was done on the picketed grid with line spacings of 400 feet. Sample interval was 100 feet and 50 feet in areas where indicated geophysical anomalies occur. The "B" soil horizon was sampled where well-developed but a number of humus samples were taken in swampy areas; some samples were omitted due to absence of soil.

This report is based on the author's geological mapping and on-site observation of soil sampling and on the geophysical report for the same claims dated May 5, 1983, by D.G. Harder and T.R. Foster.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

The claims are half a mile west of Manitouwadge Corner, the junction of Highway 17 and Highway 614. They are approximately l mile northeast of the Corona East Zone ore deposit (Figure 1) and are bordered by Arctic Red Resources on the north, east and south, and Brigade Resources on the west (Figure 2).

Access to the property was gained on foot from Highway 17. Heavy equipment can be moved to the property on the east-west power line which passes through the centre of the property.

HISTORY

The area immediately to the west of these claims has been mapped by T.L. Muir (1980). His mapping indicates that the claims are underlain entirely by the Cedar Lake Pluton.

A number of old and small rectangular pits were found on the property but no records of this work are available. The most recent exploration on the property includes magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys which were completed by Manwa Exploration Services Ltd. in April/May of 1983.

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The three claims are underlain by a north-east dipping sequence of greywackes, felsic tuffs and rusty graphitic cherts which border the west margin of the Cedar Lake Pluton.

Metasedimentary rocks underlie much of the claims TB 613970

___________________________ MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.———


and TB 613971. They are chlorite-biotite schists with varying proportions

of quartz and sericite. These schists are pervasively garnetiferous and

locally iron-sulphide-bearing. They are generally fine-grained, well-

foliated and thinly bedded to laminated.

The southwest corner of claim TB 613970 is underlain by felsic

tuffs which are interbedded with the greywackes. These rocks are fine

to medium-grained, foliated and poorly laminated. They contain quartz,

feldspar and biotite with up to 15K fine-grained disseminated pyrite and

appear to be silicified locally.

A narrow band of graphitic and pyritic chlorite schist is

interbedded with the metasediments in the southwest corner of claim number

TB 613971. Associated with this is minor banded graphitic chert which

hosts pyrite and pyrrhotite mineralization.

Claim number TB 613972 is underlain by the Cedar Lake Pluton.

It can be described as a foliated quartz-feldspar-biotite-hornblende

granodiorite. Near the eastern boundary of the claim group the intrusion

is cut by a diabase dyke, varying from 150 to 600 feet in width.

The contact between the plutonic and volcanic-sedimentary rocks

is not exposed; the relationships at the contact have therefore not been

determined.

Narrow (less than l foot) quartzo-feldspathic, somewhat

porphyritic, concordant dykes are found distributed erratically in the

metasediments.

Mineralization

Disseminated, fine-grained to medium-grained pyrrhotite and

pyrite range locally from 1/S to 105& of rock volume. The higher concen

trations of these sulphides are associated with more siliceous metasedi-

mentary beds, but sulphide concentrations have not been observed to

persist more than a few metres along strike. While the sulphide concen

trations are not always visible, they are often shown by reddish-brown

and locally limonitic gossans or iron-oxide stains.



Structural Geology

The bedded rock units strike N125 0 to N1300 and dip north eastward at 35 0 to 50 0 . Minor fold axes in the metasediments have a trend of HO0 plunging 500 , as indicated by a single measurement taken at Line 4 East where it crosses the hydro transmission line. The metasedimentary beds are generally folded irregularly. A "second" foliation was observed; it strikes north-northeast and dips westward at 40 0 . This foliation may be caused by the intrusion of the Cedar Lake Pluton.

Metamorphism

The mineral assemblage of the Boos Claims are an upper greenschist - lower amphibotite grade of regional metamorphism with a thermal overprint. Garnets present in the metasediments are probably the variety pyralspite, indicating a thermally metamorphosed contact aureole on the margins of the Cedar Lake Pluton.

PROPERTY GEOCHEMISTRY

Rock Geochemistry

Ten rock samples from the property have been assayed for gold and analysed by I.C.P. geochemical methods for molybdenum, copper, zinc, nickel and silver.

No significant gold or silver mineralization was found in thesamples.

A summary of anomalous base metal mineralization is seen in

Table 1. Sample locations are shown on the geological map.



Table 1: Summary of anomalous mineralization.

Sample No. Element Concentration in p.p.m.______Description______

B.F.- 3 Mo 91 sericite-quartz-biotite schistwith a 0.2" rusty quartz vein

B.F.- 5 Zn 240 rusty, gray-black, siliceousmetasediment (possibly

Cu 138 graphitic)

B.F.- 6 Zn 271 rusty, gray, metasedimentwith less than 53*

Cu 108 disseminated pyrite and/orpyrrhotite

B.F.-10 Zn 191 sericitic and graphiticcherty schist

Soil Geochemistry

Preamble

Although geochemical methods have been employed in the search for gold in Ontario for over 30 years, it is only in recent years that a concerted effort has been made in researching and developing new geo chemical techniques and theories. Soil is traditionally used for follow-up level geochemical surveys (Fortescue, 1983). The interpretation of geochemical data is subject to three major constraints: (1) the geochemistry of gold and gold deposits; (2) Quaternary cover of bedrock gold occurrences; and (3) the problem of sampling gold in surficial materials upon which geochemical surveys are based (Fortescue, 1983). Improvements in geochemical instrumentation have improved the detectable limit of gold in soils to l part per billion and regional studies of Quaternary cover by government agencies have recently improved our understanding of glacial effects as they relate to soil geochemical surveys.

Among the exploration and mining company personnel at the "Hemlo Camp" there is some disagreement over which soil horizon most effectively indicates the presence of bedrock gold mineralization. There is however a concensus of opinion that soil geochemistry is an



8

effective exploration tool. Probable correlations between gold mineralization and indicator minerals such as molybdenite and barite at the Lac Minerals deposit (pers. comm., G. Bennet, Resident Geologist, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario) support the classic theory that blind ore deposits or deposits where gold cannot be seen in the ore can be found by "following" concentrations of other elements. Because indicator elements may often be more easily detected than the gold, they are of considerable importance in geochemical prospecting. Those most important are As, Ag, Sb, Cu, Pb, Zn, Mo, W and Te (Fortescue, 1983).

This Survey

The existing picketed grid was used for sampling control. Samples were taken on grid lines at 400 foot spacing at 100 foot inter vals and 50 foot intervals in areas of geophysical anomalies.

Sampling was done on "B-Horizon" soils wherever possible, but the lack of good soil development prevented this in some areas of the property. Table 2 describes the soil horizons sampled. Samples were taken using grubhoes where soil horizons are well-developed and using augers where a thick cover of organic material is present.

Table 2: Summary of relative proportions of soil horizons sampled in survey.

Soil Type Proportion of Total Number of SamplesA_______________________IS.0%-————————-——B_______________________59.4--—.——.-—————C________________________1.4———.————————A/B_______________________23.2-————————————B/C________________________K4_____________A/C 1.4

Total . 99t ^——————————

Physiography:

A 50 foot high hill covers the northwest portion of claim TB 613970 and the southwest portion of claim TB 613971. The ground slopes downward from the hill at approximately 205K average grade. A

___________________________ MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD..


small creek drains southeast.across the middle of claim TB 613971

A pond and associated large ced&r swamp cover the east portion of

claim TB 613970 and the bulk of claim TB 613972. All surface waters

on the property appear to drain into this area.

Analysis and Presentation of Data

Samples were analysed by I.C.P. geochemical methods for

Molybdenum, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Arsenic, Antimony, Tin and Gold. A

total of 126 samples were taken.

The resulting data were analysed using two methods:

1. calculation of mean, standard, deviation, threshold

and high threshold for each element;

2. plotting frequency diagrams for each element.

A base numerical contour for each element has been arbitrarily selected

to highlight anomalous values, using the two analytical methods as guides.

Other contours have been arbitrarily selected using multiples of the

base numerical contour.

Table 3 shows the result of calculating the standard deviation,

etc., for each element. This method considers the mean value plus 2

standard deviations to be the threshold value for the set of data. It is

based on the assumption that the data fits a single normal population.

Table 3: Calculated mean, standard deviation, threshold and high threshold for the elements Mo, Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Sb, Sn and Au. (N.C. = not calculated).

Element Mean Standard Deviation Threshold High Threshold _______(M]________(S) ______(H+2S) (M+3S)Mo, p.p.m.CuPbZnAsSb "SnAu, p.p.b.

N.C. 11.80 6.79

31.633.2.3.

451024

5.79

N.C.16.90 2.70

18.54 2.53 0.34 2.39 2.64

45. 12. 68.

8.2.8.

601971517802

11.07

62.50 14.89 87.2S 11.04 3.12

10.41 13.71



Table J*——

Frequency Distribution of Elements

Semple Medium

B. BOOS CLAIMS

Interval PPM/PPB

fc.l ~"

0.30.40.5'0.6o. 1)6.80.91.61.11.21.31.41.5 ___

1.6-1.92.0-2.1 "2.2-2.42.5-2.72.8-3.03.1-3.53.6-4.04.1-5.06 -10H -IS'16-2021-2526-3031-3556-46 "41-45 "" "

46-50 "~51-5556-6061-6566-7071-7576-80

k8l-85 186-9091-9596-100161-116'111-120121-130131-140141-150"151-160161-170"in-leoHI-196191-266501-226JJi-240241-260261-280581-306301-320321-340341-360361-380381-400461-420'421-440441-460461-480461-500501-600601-700701-800801-900901-10001001-11001101-12001201-13001301-14001461-1506 "1501-20002001-30003001-40004001-5000) 5000

Elements

MoHW.

i p u|'

5L

Cuf f*1 '

0

M

/W

A-AJ|i

A

l

Phppm

z

^L

. j |rfip"7s

?h

ppw

i!rn

/Plil

ft,s(P

-f--H

ii

^

fs

ID

-rVi

-4-

SbPfMl

11*'

Q&L*

Snff/h

Si"

loJOij\ ^

/loppt

J Jjpi ^5~^

1

11

Table 4 shows the frequency distribution of analyses for each element. This data indicates that the elements Cu, Pb, As, Sb, Sn, Mo and Au are typical of a single, normal population. It indicates that two separate populations of zinc analyses exist above and below a value of 50 p.p.m.

Copper and zinc contours are shown on the same map for two reasons; they tend to have superior mobility as compounds and solutions and both show more distinct anomalous zones than other elements. Arsenic, Lead and Tin contours are shown together in order to evaluate their relative importance as indicator elements. Gold contours are shown on. an individual map. No contours are shown for Molybdenum or Antimony due to the very low standard deviations.

Geochemical Anomalies

Copper and zinc show the broadest dispersion patterns and tend to reflect local drainage patterns very well. Several coincident geochemical anomalies exist on the property. They are:

i/ a coincident Cu-Zn-Pb-Au anomaly at line 8E, 14S; this is a circular anomaly of limited lateral extent; it is the highest gold anomaly and a sample of rock near the location of this anomaly contained 91 p.p.m. molybdenum.

ii/ a linear Cu-Zn-Pb-Au anomaly extending from line 4E, 7S to line 8E, US; this anomaly is coincident with laminated metasediments which are mineralized with pyrite and pyrrhotite and close to graphitic and cherty metasediments.

iii/ a linear Cu-Zn-Pb-Au anomaly extending from line 4E, 4S to line O, IS and beyond the western property boundary; this anomaly is coincident with chloritic, laminated metasediments.

iv/ an oval-shaped Zn anomaly located at line 24E, 5S near the granodiorite/diabase contact.

v/ several localized Sn and Pb and As anomalies locatedthroughout claim TB 613972 which is underlain by granodiorite and diabase.

____________________________ MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.———


*

12

In general, the linear anomalies trend parallel to geologic strike and geophysical anomalies.

DISCUSSION ANb CONCLUSIONS

Some conclusions regarding the geophysical and geochemical anomalies on the claims can be drawn from the results of geological mapping and rock sampling.

1. The main linear VLF-EM and coincident magnetic anomalies which are located in the southwest portion of claim TB 613970 are probably caused by concentrations of pyrite and magnetic pyrrhotite. The anomalies are nearly coincident with an interbedded felsic tuff horizon and it may be that mineralization occurs along the contact with the metasediments.

2. The linear magnetic anomaly northeast of the main conductor is associated with the sulphide and graphitic chert band which is conformable with the greywacke metasediments. This anomaly would probably have a coincident VLF-EM anomaly if not for the masking effect of the power line.

3. The weak magnetic anomaly on the east portion of claim TB 613972 is coincident with a magnetic diabase dyke.

4. Soil geochemistry indicates that anomalous concentrations of copper, zinc, lead and gold are present near the locations of geophysical anomalies. The more mobile elements (Cu and Zn) closely reflect drainage patterns and topographic features on the property.

It may be that the sequence of metavolcanics and metasediments is a rafted portion of country rock that is surrounded by the Cedar Lake Pluton; this has not been confirmed. Although no anomalous gold minerali zation was found by rock sampling, the fact that bedded pyrite and pyrrhotite and anomalous gold, molybdenum, copper, zinc and lead values occur on the property make the geology somewhat attractive and comparable to "Hemlo-type" mineralization.



13

RECOMMENDATIONS

On the basis of the above-mentioned geological mapping, prospecting and geochemical sampling, and previous geophysical surveying a programme of detailed geochemical sampling, stripping, trenching and diamond drilling is warranted. This additional exploration should proceed as follows:

1. detailed geochemical sampling of B-horizon soils at 50 foot intervals on lines 2E, 6E, and 10E and on lines O, 4E, 8E and 12E where samples have not previously been taken at 50 foot intervals;

2. stripping away of overburden at selected locations across the main VLF-EM and magnetic anomalies on claim TB 613970 and the linear magnetic anomaly northeast of the power line on claim TB 613971, to expose the bedrock;

3. trenching of the bedrock exposed by stripping to better define the nature of mineralization and attitude of structures;

4. diamond drilling of N. Q. -sized core through geophysical anomalies to test the nature of any subsurface mineralization to a depth of at least 300 feet.

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

l/ Detailed geochemical sampling S 2,5002/ Overburden stripping, approximately 1700 feet 5,0003/ Rock trenching, approximately 250 feet 5,0004/ Diamond Drilling, approximately 1500 feet 45,000

357.500

Respectfully Submitted

T. R. Foster



14

JREFERENCES

Fortescue, J.A.C.1983: Geochemical Prospecting for Gold in Ontario; O.G.S.

Misc. Paper 110, p.p. 251-271.

Harder, D.G. and Foster, I.R.1983: Geophysical Report on Boos Claims, Molson Lake

Area, Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario.


This report may not be reproduced in whole, in part, or in summary without the written permission of Manwa Exploration Services Lid.

15

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, TERRANCE R. FOSTER, of 280 Albert Street, West, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, do hereby declare that;

1. I have worked as an exploration geologist and mineralogist on a full-time basis since 1981; prior to that as a geological assistant for two field seasons;

2. I graduated from Lakehead University with an Honors Bachelor of Science, Geology degree in 1981;

3. This report is based on on-site geological mapping and sampling;

4. I currently have no interest in the claims nor do I expect to receive any interest in the claims.

T.R. Foster June 22nd, 1983 Hon. B.Se.



QUALIFYING STATEMENT

I, JOHN THOMAS NEELANDS, of PH-5, 7100 Gilbert Road, Richmond, B.C., do state that I was Involved as project manager with the surveys completed on the Boos Claims and am completely familiar with the contents of this report which I verify as being true.

I further declare that since graduating with a B.Se. 1n Geology from Carleton University (1971) In Ottawa, I have been directly employed as a geologist in the mineral Industry.

In concluding it should be noted that I have no financial interest in the Boos Claims nor do I intend to receive any.

June 22, 1983 JxK NeelandsTT.G.A.C.



i l

Ministryof Report of WorkNatural (Geophysical, Geological,

Ontario-fees

Geochemical and Expenditures)

The MininType of Survey(s)

Claim Holder (t)

42CI2NWei88 2.5908 MOLSON LAKE

Ttownship or Area

900

, J

Address

Survey Company\X7

j Date of Survey (from 6* to)

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) 2-o .^ o

[Total Miles of line Cut

H 4

i \Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other t,^,

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Oo

ao3.0

Days per Claim

-

Days per Claim

--

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

nstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Certification Verifying Report of Workl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Date Certified

^jD\ (ter

1362 (B 1/9)

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

Survey Company. Author of Report ^ - ^ Address of Author Peax

Covering Dates of(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

GeophysicalDAYS

per c "m

—Radiometric.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys) Magnetometer————Electromagnetic ————— Radiometric.Electromagnetic ———

(enter dayi pe/claim)

CX.T SIGNATUREAuthor of Report or Agent

i(d

S

Res. Geol.. . QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

TO*(number)

i

i

l

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——. Profile scale ——^—

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing —————

Contour interval.

InstrumentAccuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method,Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value .^——

ELECTROMAGNETIC Coil configuration

Coil separation

AccuracyMethod: CD Fixed transmitter Q Shoot back Q In line Frequency ...,. ...,,,

(specify V.L.F. station)

EH Parallel line

Parameters measured

Instrument.Scale constant

GRAVITY Orrprtinns made

Base station value and location ., , . ,...— .—.-.—.—,....,

Elevation accuracy.

zH

(i

Instrument ————————— Method D Time Domain Parameters — On time ———

- Off time ——,— Delay time.— Integration time.

O Frequency Domain _ Frequency ______ Range ——————

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument_____________________________________ Range. Survey Method ———————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)^—^^———^——————^-—-—.———————————.—-—.Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector————————^——^—^—^———-————————.-.——.—™—.Overburden —-——^——-,—————————————.-—————.—.—....——.——.—^^

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—————————^—^—————————————Instrument ———————————————————————————Accuracy^^———^^^^^——^———————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)-——— Instrument(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy_________________

(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used-——————-—.-———-—-————.———.——^.—Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.c* va*r?2.

' V 1

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample————SS,

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight—Q -2.S Method of Collection-

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. o**

Terrain.

Drainage Development——!Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. KvP-P-b.

Ni, Co, Ag,

. st,Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical ,

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. (^-^-^———

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Extraction ', Analytical Method.

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory.Extraction Method—t , . ,., , . -r r- "P Analytical Method -*"w * *

D DD

rAsj(circle)

GeneraL General.

File No. 7561.1V2Our F1le:2.5908

1984 02 06

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

Bernard Boos recorded 20 days Induced Polarization assessment work credits on each of mining claims TB 613970 to 72 Inclusive on September 30, 1983.

The survey reports and maps were not submitted to the Mlnltfer within the time prescribed by Section 77 of the Mining Act.

You are hereby authorized to delete the work credits recorded on September 30, 1983 from each of the claim record sheets. Please Inform the recorded holder accordingly.

nYours very truly,

J. R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

M. E. Anderson/dg

cc: Bernard Boos Suite 19777 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1X7

cc: Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

F1UNNO. 1V2

1984 02 07

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

RE: Geological and Geochemical survey on mining claims TB 613970 et al 1n the Area of Molson Lake.————.

The Geological and Geochemical survey assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

J. R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1U3Phone: 416/965-1380

M. E. Anderson:dg

cc: Bernard Boos 19-777 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1X7

cc: Manwa Exploration Services Ltd. Box 2028 Wawa, Ontario POS 1KO

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario.

Encl.

Ministry of Technical Assess

^ources Work CreditsOntario flr

ment ^2.5908Date [Mining Recorder's Report of

'February 6, 1 98/F0* N O.

Recorded HolderBernard Boos

Township or AreaMolson Lake Area

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Inricirorl pnlnrization riayt

Other rlflyt

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Cltlmt Attested" column

20Geological dayi

20Geochemical day*

Man days D Airborne CD

Special provision [E! Ground El

[~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claimi Attested

TB 613970 to 72 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

l l not sufficiently covered by the survey l l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77 (19) 60

B28 (83/6)

Ontario -L.

GeotechnicalRW

Approval-S f a

Mining Lands Comments

277-^ 7

To: Geophysics

Comment!

f~l Approved j Wich to see again with correctiontDate Signature

DTo: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

01/y l to d&ys rf

Approved | ] Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry Dr. f of kComments

tt

Approved l l Wish to see again with correctionsDate , .

f ]To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1983 10 22

412

2.5908

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

We have received reports and maps for a (Geological and Geochemical survey)submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage)ton mining claims TB 613970 et al 1n the Area of Molson Lale.)

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone:{416)965-1380

R. P1chette:mc

cc: Bernard Boos19-777 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 1X7

cc: Manwa Exploration Services Ltd Box 2028 Wawa, Ontario POS 1KO

Ts

72, 7

Q 3

RO

US

LA

KE

, -

ib

—

^J —

—

—

II"^

T"^

^ . ?.7

4F^:~

-J-*-

tti N s

i G|

4-tt

- 5

/^VS

JJ

15

L? __il

*___l*

---

——

.-- —

--M

— —

—^-

*—L—

*-—

*—:i;

——

--rr

rs.—

—*~

TS.

. ^

01

.1

i JJ

— —

—J_

_ _

— t—

—r

-T

' In

. t

i*

^

J-_

__

_L

-——

—O)

H

I01

-t

1 -^

H

I-*

1. H d

*^_i-

^_

L

—__

\I~

—O

l i a

, 10

1 l

(Tl *

H l

*

W

S

'*

ka'0

1 \

8'i

H-

S,-

*ff

ii*

\ si

**

j^.^

L.^

__

|^

__

l -_

/fl,

f""

_ _

__

j__

__

__

w

-j

' CT

-,T

W

ty

l -

, w

-!i

- J*T

3c,

"f's?

--e

w f

m ^-'f

^ ~

--

-—,|--

__l-

____L

7-__-j-

___|-

— _

_\

^V0

! *

o! l S

B

'J^?

o^ljS

w

l X

w i

"•sO

^

i

l— r*

V—

i__L

___l

:__L

-l__

"i

?1 i

12

HtE?

fi

.-J -

"l_

__

_..

__

_4

--m—

t ,

' 3

T*

i;'

i 3

5 "i

s-V

n—

H-iS

"d"

- -5

-- j -"

11__i

--2

. ^_

_ijji_

_ i

.**

_L

_st

_I—

T"

ft

^"~

""

~

***

Mio

ioT

iir

*

i~

~

~~

*"

"'

~~

"~

^r J.

— -J

-— —

— ~

—yl

— 4

.-k^

— —

—^ —

— —

-t——

—

* T

w

f o,

w V

J^

TX

"T

5

w1

en,

_ _

_, —

_ .L

_ _i

*(T

l j

01

H~

*

1ft

s__

_

.

~ '

""

'L

- -1

"- -

J.T

! - -

Jl- ^

l*

- l —

— —

^—

-5g

"

- . _

.^

25

^.6

fr;4

526|6

r45

2C

|6745l4

|6

745Q

8|67

450Z

J39

ZI

V ^

""

I ?*

7

,— M

l

W

3926 1

8 15

926

19 '

5 9

2 6

20

w .

-"

. -"

1,1

. —

__L _n —

' _

_

l

-. —

—i H

— \

to en

w;

p ft

M

| w

w^f

fi ' -i

ft ~

*o

u

NO

co

l o

w

*

"ic ^ i

--.

—f

(4X

^.

V

™

u

^™ ~

~ 71

t

-L~~

i rt l

~i

r ^~

""

^*

— -

liT

-or-

j ra

r

—.-

-___J-___.—

. —

(D

~or~

af "

(o'o

T~w

t ~i

b"ffT

~(or

" w

"en~

31 ^

~S

DO

^ O 03 m O i O

) ro

o

. y

i oi

't-"

' JL

J^,J

-JS

.:

E^

'oT -j

j* w --l *

w oi"~

-j ^ m ^L

- "?r --tjr

V-o

i-

-I 3,

1

5f f

O) -j A Ol

O *. ")

"31

. \T

^"

2 ro

Ui

— t-

ft o ru O

~^

4-^

-

^

vSM

51

1

— r

"

S|

m O ut -J ffi o ^

SI- r -i-

j- î i

o L

5 l i

-•f -

f

^T

z 0

|

j\S

h"

.~ i

^ ~

~~

t31

1 i y —r

f r y-^•-**^1

2"

^0 '* ~5

d g" *S

i.. w

-t S

o M

"

ff*

O M

1

3 1 i

— —

-^—

H

1W

|

Ol

O N ——

—

O

O 5

Si 1

~T Si l

s i

O J

I

~ l

-^~

1s

" 2 ut

OI

"TJJ

•t^V

"^

-

^1

-"--^

-^û

v !^ 2v

01 -i

tji2

,:S

rogS

5(ji

***

, m

,,

\o

tn

Jo (~J.

— ^

, — -

S

S H

o

C

3o

)

"

——

01

Hen

m

a 0

-*--

1 "^

1 at

-ti

O*

CDi

os.

O ^*s.

00

U1

-o

A U1

SO

UT

H

PA

RT

O

F W

HIT

E

LA

KE

G

-o

l O) o Co

33 2

^CD

Q)

^

w ^r

2.

o ^

wc:

tu 3-

o CDO

00

5

r-

"^ ^

lwQ

) W

-,

33

5 5 a n 3

w

s -lH

-i "

m

3D m >

m

z O

2m

330

2

H m m

x^ -H X

C ^

o

rn OP

5

O*

m OD

x

tj*

o r o z m

W o z o I o o I z w

z D

O

<

nO

r;

S

oo

m

m

2?

O

w m

0 6 2

2 S

I g Z

33

oJ

i71

m

^

n

O

x

jjB.

3

n-5

^

S

?

?m

I - I

C

Z

Oo

— co

Q X-c

(T X 6 T

-H

•c

m |0 JTl

O ;o l H00 -o

o 00

C?©

(5o

Ê

anc

X

S 103 O

•r*

O ^1 O 3D

O O

00

J3

—

>

?

S

C z

O

3C .'

OT

3:

Tl

C—

Jl

33

i rn

o

r c

^

C 33 b

S

c

7 - ^ C

C

-1

O

T33

-i

^

>

^

^~

T

-1-

~

X

^

>

X

—.

—

>

iS

iT

- >

7

1

c "S

'~*r" f!

~ 0

O

m

o o.

g

Sil

n

-i

o

tn

O

Oz

a

aj o

5 g

l ? > H O

O-

A >

A

Ol

"'

ZO

Oo

-1"-

5*3

* y

-y

K?

IO "

O

Oo

r* g

O

•Q1

* y3

Sb

S

i: —

o.

O M4V o o s

in >

z o o 3 a. m r

py Pyrite

po Pyrrhotite

G Gossan

Intermediate to Felsic Intrusive Rocks

(a) granodiorite(b) diorite/trondhjemite

B. BOOS CLAIMSFelsic Intrusive Rocks

Strike and dip of foliation

Strike and dip of 'second* foliation

Rock outcrop,small

cx Area of outcrop

S G eological contact,approximate

(a) quartz ( >} - feldspar porphyry(b) feldspar ( z*) - quartz porphyry

Volcanic-Sedimentary Rocks

greywacketuffaceous shale or siltstonesericite and quartz predominant in matrixfeldspar conspicuous in matrixchlorite and/or biotite-rich matrixgarnetiferoussiltstonethinly bedded to laminatedchloriticrusty; sulphide bearing

LITTLE CEDAR

LAKE

Rock sample location

Steep slopegroncd/or/ncgentle S. slope

Iron Formation

-O+oo B .L (e) banded graphitic chert(k) rusty or ferruginous cherty rocks

balsam, poplar S birch cover LOCATION MAPound

coveredlow, wet g

alder Felsic Volcanic Rocks MOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP NO.G603

( a) massive(e) tuff(M) thinly bedded to laminated(S) silicified

fiat to S. E .

gently sloping groundcedar

birch cdvvr

Intermediate Volcanic Rocks

large granodiorite boulders

Mafic Volcanic Rocks

(a) massive(e) tuff(II) thinly bedded to laminated

spruce 6. poplar cover - o+oo B . L

T. B. 61

of no outcrop6 a lder

f/y S. E. s loping

farge granoauon

5J,k,IX4epy

B.F 10

bouldersN. s lope

low, flat ground

lo w, flat ground

minor fold axis at H00 ,500E to moderate

pe towards pondgentle

S. SE. sil 5c,f,k flat groundl 5 -IO*/

spruce 6 b alsam covercedar S spruce

coverbalsam

T B. 613972granodiorite

boulders

a,e, or

5h,i,k lowt flat ground5cJ,k,l,r B.F-6 5c,h,r

5c,halder 6.

coverlo wt flat ground \overburden

3970T. B. 6 l

to gently stoping

PONDr 5h,k,Ur

5j,k,l,r(l-20XoV.f.g.po)

\ 2x4plT

thick alders

5c,l 6, 6b

alders, poplars, spi uce fi brush cover

B. BOOS

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

THUNDER BAY M. D ONTARIOMOLSON LAKE AREA

^ 100 ft June 27,1983MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.

42C12NWei(B8 2 .5908 M OLSON LAKE 210

LITTLE CEDAR

LAKE

LOCATION MAPMOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAPNO.G603

- I +OOS 1.3 48,2.2 2 S

1 2 S 18.42,2,5

1,6,2,17,2,2,2,61j 2J. to,*,*

- 0+ oo B . LT. B. 6 l

1/0,10,46,2,2,2,5-

f, l 6, 44, 2f *tf 2 51,25,254.22,5

t 1 245.55 3 2, 25

1 24 S. 30. 32.7 S

1 248 SC 2 22 S

1,16,7,77,4,2,2,5

T. B. 613972

1ILZ32 32 2S, t ?4,22,4, St, 5,7,40,4,2,2.5

f C 9.66,2,2,2. S

, 6/2,64.5 2,2,6

±1,145,23,42,10,51.39.S.42 3 2, S S

1,13,3, 28,2.2,2,5

3970T. B. 61 1,27,9,34,3,27*0

1f i3 44/2 225

l H, f S S*. 10 2,3, f Qf 2.6 M S 2, C S

1.3,8,26,2,3,1,5,,30,4 2*0,5

1,6,1035,2 2,9 S1,8,7,275,2,25

*,***, 2,9,5

t,/6,442^3,2, S

1.7, 9 2 2,3,2,/3, 5

,1066,22,2.22

,7,10,4,2,2,5

B. BOOS1,1,4. to 2 27.5

LEGEND GEOCHEMICAL LEGEND

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - GOLD p pbSAMPLE LOCATION


"* 100 ft June 27,1983, 40, 5t 51 t 5 2 2, S MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.

Values in ppmTRANSMISSION LINESCALE

100 200

B. BOOS CLAIMS

TB ' TB 6l397d6l3972

Afc.rtf.#.A'k.#.-^ Aa 1 S, 10, *'5, 2, Z, 2t

LITTLE CEDAR

LAKE

23 6 2 2 5

1,4,5,20,2 22,5

-Of00 B.L

LOCATION MAPMOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP No. G603

^8,10,27,2,3.*- I+OOS

13 4 8.2 2 2 S1 17, 1,41.18, *,V.

12 9.18.4.2 2.5124.26,55,2.2*.*

1,20,8,292,2,5,5

1.6 2 172.2 2.6

1,6,4,26,2- o+oo B . L

T. B. 6 lf f 1^22,22, S

1,3,82/2225

1 30, 3f 3Gf Z 2, S 5

1.924442.2.3.5 1,7,5,334,

1.4.5.202225i* f 5.G28222S

1.117516.22 S

,to, W 2,2 e 51,35,264,2,25

, 7, G. 44,2,2 2 f S S 27 2 2 2.51 25254.225

1 9,7,59,2,2,2,5

i 1 24 5. 55'32 25

1.24 5.30.3 2.751. 8 f 0.103. 9 2. 2 5

1t.74o.5225t.3.11 233225 \fZ48S6222S f 3.6.9.12.2/0 5

1.1^.7,774.22.5 1.12.4222 2.2 s

2 7 liSS IS 2.7 Bf f2 G 33.2 2 2 10 t. 3. S./8S 24 S

T. B. 6I3972*4 6.97,3.2, 2.51, S, 6,40, 2,2 2 B1.6. 3 St 32 z S

t/l.6.32 32 ?S* W 24,22,4,3

1, 24.95392G.5t6.1153423 S1,14,5,2.3,4*2,10,5

1 39.6.42 3.1,37145,2.2.5

113,3,2^2.2 2 5IX

14,9,33,2,3, 2,5

3970. 61 1 27, 9,36, S, 2,7,12 6 //Z 2,4,5

44/2 ? 2. 5

* IS,? 2 1, 2,2 2,51 f9.547 4245

135 ZS S1,3 S W 2 2 y 5

1, 3S 26,2,3,2 S1,10.3,30,4,2/0,5

f 3 c 7 2 2 2, 151,8,7,275,2,251,4.9,35,2,22,5 t (35,7.91,6,2,4,25 1,7,922\32, /S 5

*,'42322,29S1/6,3442,2,9 S f 2 875.3310

1,16, 4t 42 2,3,2,51.13/0.642.25 H i 1,*8,725,4,2, 6,S

.0,2, 22 S

t 9, G,20,232. S

12,7,10,4,225

B. BOOSLEGEND GEOCHEMICAL LEGEND

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY- ^ ARSENICSAMPLE LOCATION

CLAIM POSTContours at

Lead 10 , 15 ppm

Tin 10 ppm

... Arsenic 10 ppm

Molybdenum — nil

Antimony —nil


June 27,1983r- loo ft40 5 SI 3 22 5 MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.

LAKE OR POND

Values in ppmTRANSMISSION LINESCALE

100 800

42CI2NW0I08 2 .5908 MOLSON LAKE S30

B. BOOS CLAIMS

\ re ' TB6139 7d 613972

-3+OON S,l24.22.2.to

LITTLE

CEDAR

LAKE

* 1,4,5 20,2 2 2,5

-O* 00 B.L.17 9.33 92.2 5

LOCATION MAPMOLSON LAKE AREA CLAIM MAP NO.G603

^10,27,2,3,4,5

1,3.48.2 2 2

I2d26,55, 2,2,3,6

1,149 29, St ?,3,- o+oo B.L

T. E 6 lf 10,10,46,2,22,5

1,^,9,52,S,2,'^

1.3,5,2042,2,5,*4,4, 22 2\t,5,525254.225

12455532 25

1.24S.3032.75

1,3,1,143,2,2,51 6.7 40, S. 2 2 S

\f 24 8 S6 2 225 Hi f 3.6.9.12.2 JO S

1,124222 2 2f r * f J f t

\ f f 2. 6.33 2 2 2, W t, 3, S,/8 6,24 5T. B. 613972

1, 2495392

^39, 6, 42,3,25, S \ \f SOS 42.2.2 2/5 113,3 28,2,2 2 5

3970** T. B. 61 f 27, 9,36,3, 27 \\ \ 12 6 l! 2 2,4,5

5 5 27,6 22 5'f * -* f ,

1 57212225L 14.fe.54, 10Z,3,fO

POND

^ 1,10.3,30,4, 2 fO,S\1,3,6,7,22,2,15

X x f, 8,7.27 5,2, 2 S1,4.9,35.2,226 17.9,2s 5 ^ /^ 5

1,/42,32f 2,2,9,S \

'fti6,5,22,22,2,515+00 S -

1. 2o, 7 to Z, 3,9,5 \1,16,4,42,2,3,2,5

1,t,8,30 2 2 2,

^ ^^Z 20,*,^,^

B. BOOS1,14/0,2 2'7t S

LEGEND GEOCHEMICAL LEGENDCOPPERGEOCHEMICAL SURVEY-

THUNDER BAY M. D ONTARIO

Copper 15, 60,105 ppm MOLSON LAKE AREA

~ 1 00 ft June 27,1983Zinc 30, 60, 90 ppm, 40, 5 51 3 22, 5 MANWA EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD.

42C12NW0ie8 2.5908 MOLSON LAKE 240

rpt on geol mapping/prosp/geoch samp - …...follow-up level geochemical surveys (fortescue, 1983)....

Documents