CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD.

MINERALS DIVISION

31C11NEaei25 2.2727 KALADAR ^,^010

GEOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY

Of the

KALADAR CLAIMS

PROJECT GRENTARIO

Lot 5 Cone. X, XiLot 6 Cone. X, XI (EastLot 7 Cone. IX, X, XiLot 8 Cone. IX, X

Kaladar TP. Lennox and Addington Co.Ontario

NTS 31 C/ll

Claims EO - 503939-503967

ft f

by: D.M.Robertson,B.Se.(Hons.)

Work Completed During the Period April 7, 8 and May 2 to 12, 1978

3iciiNEeeas z . 2727 KALADAR 010C

SUMMARY.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lINTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2LOCATION AND ACCESS....... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2PREVIOUS WORK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5WORK COMPLETED....... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5PHYSIOGRAPHY..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ........ 8GEOLOGY. . . . . . . .. ... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

General Geology.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . 9Description of the rock units.................. 11Economic Geology.......,....................... 14Summary of Geology and Mineralization.......... 14

SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY . ............ . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. 15Introduction........ ..... ... ....... . .. .. .... ... 15Sampling Procedures............................ 15Laboratory Procedures................. ... ...... 15Statistical Treatment of Results............... 16Results of the Soil Geochemistry Survey........ 20

POND AND STREAM SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY............. 21ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY....... . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23LAKE SEDIMENT SURVEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .... . . . . . . . 25

Introduction................. . .. . .. ... .. . .. .. .. 25Results.................^ . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. ... . .. 26Conclusion..................... ..... ..... .... . . 32

SUMMARY OF ANOMALIES... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................... 35

APPENDIX I. . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ............ 37

LIST OF FIGURES................................... ii

LIST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .'. lil

LIST OF PLANS..... ....... ............... . . . . . . . . . . iii

FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Location Map 3

2 Detailed Location Map 4

3 Proposed grid 6

4 Frequency distribution of zinc in B soils 17

5 Frequency distribution of zinc in pond and stream 18 sediment

6 Cumulative frequency distribution of zinc in B soils,non-anomalous population 19

7 Cumulative frequency distribution of zinc in pond andstream sediment, non-anomalous population 2 2

8 Frequency distributions of metals in Otter Creek Lakesediment 27

9 Frequency distribution of loss on ignition, Otter CreekLake sediments 28

10 Cumulative frequencies of non-anomalous populations,Otter Creek Lake sediments 29

11 Cumulative frequency of non-anomalous zinc populationin Otter Creek Lake sediments 30

12 Location of G.S.C. Lake sediment values 34

APPENDIX I

Laboratory Geochemical Reports 37

TABLES

Table Page

1 Table of Formations 10

2 Statistical data for zinc in B soils 20

3 Statistical data for zinc in pond and stream sediment 20

4 Anomalous threshold and mean values for zinc 16

5 Range of zinc values in rock chip samples 23

6 Statistical summary of lake sediment sample data 31

7 Comparison of G.S.C. lake sediment values above andbelow Spry Lake Showing 33

PLANS

Plan

1 Geology

2 "B" horizon soil, pond sediment and rock chip geochemistry sample locations and zinc values

3 Zinc contours in "B" horizon soils

4 Lake sediment sample locations and metal values.

- iii -

(1)

SUMMARY

The Kaladar property is underlain by metasedimentary

and metavolcanic rocks of the "Grenville Series". These rocks

lie in a tightly folded northeast to southwesterly trending

structure known as the Clare River syncline, which is bounded on

the southeast by quartz monzonite of the Sheffield pluton.

The belts of marble, up to 2000 feet wide, were found

on the claims. These marbles are potential hosts for high grade

zinc mineralization, although none has been found in the claims

at this time.

Work on the claims includes 25.2 miles (40.6 km) of

line cutting, 12.5 line miles (20.1 km) of geological mapping

and 14.8 line miles (23.7 km) of geochemical sampling. 66 lake

sediment samples, 268 B horizon soil samples, 33 pond and stream

sediment samples, and 46 roc^chip samples were taken. All

samples were analyzed for zinc. The lake sediment samples were

also analyzed for copper and lead.

Two significant zinc soil anomalies were obtained.

The largest, with values up to 910 ppm zinc, lies just northeast

of the claims and appears to be due to glacial dispersion from

mineralization located further to the north. The other soil

anomaly with values up to 735 ppm zinc lies along the belt of

marble located between the central beaver ponds and the

Lingham Lakes. More detailed soil sampling is required in this

area.

(2)

INTRODUCTION

29 claims covering Concessions IX, X, XI, Lots 5,

6, 7, and 8, were staked for Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.

in Kaladar Township, Ontario, on ground underlain by part of the

Clare River Syncline. Marbles in this structure are potential

hosts for- zinc deposits of the type characterized by the Baltnat-

Edwards district of New York and the Long Lake zinc mine in

neighbouring Frontenac County.

Staking was done under contract by:

E. Romaniuk (EO 503039-53) and G. Desautels (EO 503954-67) of

Jean Alix Company Ltd., of Val d'Or in July 1977, and recorded

at Toronto on July 19, 1977. The claims were transferred to

Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Minrals Division, on August 22,

1977.

This report will describe the geology of the claim area

and the results obtained from a geochemical soil survey completed

by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Minerals Division, the

holder of the claims.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The centre of the property is located approximately

2*s miles southeast of the village of Kaladar (see Figures l and 2)

The southwest edge of the property can be reached via a narrow,

private track which turns off Hwy 41, 4 miles south of Kaladar.

Two narrow tracks lead through abandoned fields to the northeast

edge of the property from a gravel road which turns off Hwy. 7,

2^ miles east of Kaladar.

fcv it.

f .Jim.-w

.AK

fafc

i-. A rf,,i.J-*

*,,!I

,,iu-j;

LOCATION6? KALADAR CLAWS

(5)

PREVIOUS WORK

The property lies within an area mapped in 1977 by

J.M. Wolff of the Geological Branch, Ontario Ministry of

Natural Resources. A preliminary map (P. 1563) at a scale

of l inch to h mile is available at present along with a summary

of field work (O.D.M. Summary 19-7 Field Work, Misc. Paper 75).

This area is also covered at a scale of l inch to 2 miles by

the Madoc Area map sheet Number 2053 published in 1964 by

D.F. Hewitt , and at a scale of l inch to l mile on Map No.Sld-2Grimsthorpe-Kennebec Area by W.D. Harding, 1942 .

The only recorded assessment work in the immediate

area is by Glenshire Mines Ltd. which holds 12 claims which

adjoin Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.'s claims to the

south and west. Work .on these claims consisted of geochemical

sampling, geological mapping, geophysical surveys and six

diamond drill holes. This work outlined the presence of two

radioactive pegmatite dykes and a zinc soil anomaly with values

up to 1480 ppm.

WORK COMPLETED

1) Line Cutting:

A cut and picketed grid, consisting of a 10,000 foot

(3050 m) base.ine, two tielines, each totalling 10,000 feet

{3050 m), and 26 crosslines varying from 8,000 feet (2440 m)

Hewitt, D.F.1964, Geological notes for Maps Nos. 2053 S 2054Madoc-Gananoque: O.D.M.

2 Harding, W.D.1944, Geology of Kaladar and Kennebec Townshipsin O.D.M. 51st Ann.Rep. Vol.LI,Part IV,1942.

(7)

to 13,000 feet (3960 m) was planned to cover the claims. This

would have totalled 282,000 feet (86,000 m) or 59.1 miles

(95 km). The proposed grid is shown on Figure 3.

Jean Alix Company Ltd., of Val d'Or, P.Q., was

contracted to complete this work during March, 1978. Line

cutting was undertaken between March 12 and 25, 1978.

Unfortunately, the rapid break up of the ice in

late March forced the cancellation of the line cutting at

which time only 133,100 feet (40,600 m) or 25.2 miles (40.6 km)

had been cut. Of this total, only 85,100 feet (25,950 m) or

16.1 Miles (25.9 km) was chained. The completed lines are

shown on Plan l

2) Geological Mapping;

A total of 12.5 line miles (20.1 km) of geological

mapping was completed between May 2 and 12, 1978, by D.M.

Robertson of Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. Of this total,

5.2 miles (8.3 km) was completed on cut and picketed lines

spaced 400 feet apart and the remaining 7.3 miles (11.7 km)

was completed on pace and compass lines spaced approximately

800 to 1000 feet apart.

3) Geochemical Sampling;

A total of 14.8 line miles (23.7 km) were soil

sampled by D.M. Robertson and J.R. Hill on April 7 and 8 and

by D.M. Robertson between May 2 and 12, 1978. Samples were

taken at 200 foot intervals on the cut and picketed lines

which were spaced 400 feet apart and at 400 foot intervals

on the pace and compass lines which were spaced 800 to 1000

feet apart. Details of the samples are as follows:

(8)

Sample Type Element Determined No. of Samples

'B' horizon soil Zn 267

Pond or stream sediment Zn 33

Rock chip Zn 46

Total samples 347

347 samples of all types were taken, for a total of

347 determinations.

4) Names and addresses of personnel:

David M. Robertson Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. GeologicalMinerals Division mapping and801-161 Eglinton Ave. E., geochemicalToronto, Ont. sampling

Johannes R. Hill " Geochemicalsampling

Dr. R.H. Wallis,P.Eng. " Chief geologist

Dr. C.F. Gleeson C.F. Gleeson S Associates Geochemical764 Belfast Rd., consultant Ottawa, Ont.

Irenee Cyr Jean Alix Co. Ltd. LinecutterC.P. 910, Val d'Or, P.Q.

Edouard Morrissette " "

Yvon Champagne " "

Richard Desfosses " "

PHYSIOGRAPHY

Relief on the property is low, everywhere less than

50 feet with ground surface elevations ranging from 600 to

650 feet. The topography consits of low, parallel lying,

elongated bedrock ridges and hollows trending northeast to

southwest along the strike direction of the rock units.

(9)

Beavers are very active and most of the low ground

is covered by long swamps or beaver ponds. There are two

main chains of lakes on the property, the Otter Creek Lakes

in the northwest, and the Lingham Lakes in the southeast.

Lying between these is a long series of beaver ponds which

effectively cut the claims in half.

The two major marble units lie on either side of

the central chain of beaver ponds and form the higher and

better drained ground.

There is generally only a thin mantle of till and

bedrock exposure is good throughout most of the claim area.

Vegetation;

The claims are generally wooded with a mixed semi-

mature to mature stand of deciduous and coniferous trees.

The best stands are over the marbles. There are numerous

open grassy areas over the bedrock ridges where the soil is

too thin to support a heavier growth. Thick cedar is common

on the lower ground. There are also some abandoned fields

over the marble unit at the northeastern edge of the claims.

GEOLOGY

General Geology

The Kaladar claims are underlain by part of the

Clare River Syncline which consists of Precambrian metasedi-

mentary and metavolcanic rocks of the "Grenville Series" group.

These are bounded on the southeast by quartz monzonite of the

Sheffield pluton. Marbles in this syncline are potential

(10)

hosts for high grade zinc mineralization of the type found

at the Long Lake mine in nearby Olden Township.

Mapping was restricted to the area between the Otter

Creek Lakes and the Lingham Lakes and was primarily intended

to delineate the extent of the marble units. This area was

mapped at a scale of l inch to 400 feet along pace and compass

lines oriented perpendicular to the strike and spaced

approximately 1000 feet apart. The completed portion of a

cut and picketed grid was used for reference at the northeast

edge of the claims. Grid lines were spaced 400 feet apart.

Mapping was done in conjunction with soil sampling. The

geology is shown on Plan 1.

The claim area was divided into five units as out-

- lined on Table l

Table l Table of Formations

CENOZOIC

Recent Pleistocene till - organic swamp and lake sediment

Unconformity

PRECAMBRIAN

5 Pegmatite dikes

4 Quartz monzonite intrusive contact

3a hornblende- (biotite) feldspar gneiss

3b biotite or muscovite schist

2 marble

la quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss

Ib biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss

(11)

A Unit l consists of quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss (la) and

biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss (lb). Unit 2 is the marble.

Unit 3 consists of medium to coarse grained foliated hornblende-

feldspar gneiss (3a) and a medium grained biotite or muscovite

schist (3b). These rocks are considered to be metavolcanic in

origin. Unit 4 is the quartz monzonite of the Sheffield Pluton,

Unit 5 consists of coarse grained pegmatite dikes.

Rocks of the "Grenville Series" group in this area

have undergone middle almandine-amphibolite grade regional

metamorphism. This has obscured many of the original features

of the rocks.

The rock units strike consistently about north 45

east and dip to the southeast. The dip steepens towards the

contact with the quartz monzonite.

Description of the rock units;

Unit l

Quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss (la) and biotite-

quartz-feldspar gneiss (lb).

This is a pink to grey, weakly foliated fine to

medium grained rock. It is predominantly quartzo-feldspathic

with the amount of biotite increasing in the darker toned

horizons. The biotite rich gneiss is interbanded with and

grades into the quartzo-feldspathic gneiss within the scale

of an outcrop. Garnet is a common accessory mineral. This

would appear to be a metamorphosed quartzite and greywacke

sequence. Thin quartz lenses are common in both units. The

quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss forms the predominant rock type

in the area of the central beaver ponds and between the central

marble belt and the Lingham Lakes.

(12)

Unit 2 - Marble

Three belts of marble were found on the property.

The marble is generally blue grey or white, medium to coarse

grained and appears to be composed mostly of calcite. There

are occasional bands of tremolitic marble, and some interbedded

quartzite bands. The marble occasionally shows fine lamina

tions formed by alternating grey and white colour bands.

The marble generally occupies the higher ground.

The largest belt is about 2000 feet wide and lies between

the Otter Creek Lakes and the central beaver ponds. The

contact with the meta-volcanic rocks to the northwest runs

through the centre of the Otter Creek Lakes, while the south

eastern contact runs approximately along the edge, of the central

beaver ponds. There is also an 800 foot wide belt of marble

lying between the central beaver ponds and the Lingham Lakes.

The third belt of marble lies along the shore of the upper

Lingham Lakes. A fault runs through the Lingham Lakes,

separating the marble from the quartz monzonite to the south-

east.

No zinc mineralization was seen on the property,

however, three miles to the southwest in the same belt of

marbles is a showing of sphalerite and zinkenite. As there

is no gossan or staining or other sulphide mineralization

associated with the showing, it is difficult to detect on

weathered outcrop surfaces. This the type of mineralization

expected on the claims.

(13)

Unit 3 - hornblende (biotite) feldspar gneiss (3a) and biotite

or muscovite schist (3b).

These rocks have been interpreted as meta-volcanics,

alhthough most primary features have been obscured by regional

metamorphism. Relic pillow structures are visible in one

outcrop of coarse hornblende gneiss on the southwest h of

Lot 7, Cone. X.

These rocks are generally medium grained, well

foliated to schistose and consist primarily of hornblende,

biotite and feldspar. Garnets are a common accessory mineral.

Several small, localized gossan zones were noted

in the schistose rocks. They are probably due to disseminated

pyrite. There are no high zinc values associated with them.

The area to the northwest of the Otter Creek Lakes

is underlain entirely by Unit 3. Between the Otter Creek Lakes

and the Lingham Lakes, the metavolcanics outcrop as narrow

discontinuous bands within the quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss.

There appears to be a gradation between the hornblende rich

gneiss and the biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss rather than a

distinct contact.

Unit 4 - quartz monzonite

The quartz monzonite intrudes the metasediments and

meta-volcanics in the vicinity of the Lingham Lakes. The

contact is a zone of "lit par lit" intrusion. A fault running

through the upper Lingham Lakes separates the quartz monzonite

from the marble in this area.

The quartz monzonite is pale pink, medium grained and

weakly foliated, and consists mostly of quartz and feldspar

with minor amounts of biotite. No mineralization was noted

in this unit.

(14)

Unit 5 Pegmatite Dikes

A coarse grained, quartz-feldspar tourmaline pegmatite

dike intrudes the quartz feldspar biolite gneiss on the

southwest quarter of Lot 8, Cone. XI. The dike extends for

over 100 feet along strike with a width of about 30 feet.

The tourmaline crystals reach 5 cm in length.

Economic Geology;

The primary target in the claim area was high grade

zinc mineralization of the type found at Long Lake in

Frontenac County. No zinc mineralization was found on the

claims. A showing of sphalerite and zinkenite is known to

occur three miles to the southwest in the same belt of marble

as underlies the claims.

The only mineralization seen on the claims was weak

disseminated pyrite associated with gossan zones in the

schistose rocks and some pyrite associated with quartz veins

in the quartzQ-feldspathic gneiss.

Summary of Geology and Mineralization

The claims are underlain by metasediments and metavolca-

nics of the "Grenville Series" which lie in a lightly folded

northeast-southwesterly trending structure known as the

Clare R. syncline. This is bounded on the southeast by quartz

monzonite of the Sheffield Pluton.

No economic mineralization was found on the claims,

although three belts of marble, which are potential host

l rocks for zinc mineralization are present. These warrant

further investigation and more detailed soil sampling.

(15)

Geo chemis try

Introduction;

Relief on the property is low, consisting of parallel

rocky ridges protruding through a thin veneer of till. The

soils are generally thin and exhibit a homogeneous brown

wooded profile. They usually have a thin Ah horizon under

a cover of leaf litter, no leached Ac horizon, and an orange

brown silty sand "B" horizon. Much of the lower ground is

occupied by swamps or beaver ponds.

Sampling Procedures;

Soil samples were taken at intervals of 200 feet on

picket lines spaced 400 feet apart and at intervals of 400

feet on pace and compass lines spaced approximately 1000 feet

apart. A sample was taken from the top of the B horizon at

each site, usually at a depth of 4 to 8 inches.

Sediment samples were taken from the edge of the beaver

ponds and swamps. Rock chip samples were taken at roughly

1000 foot intervals along the lines.

All samples were stored in heavy duty, high wet strength

Kraft envelopes then sent to Bondar and Clegg Company Ltd.

in Ottawa for analysis.

Laboratory Procedures;

The samples are dried and sieved to -80 mesh (-100 mesh

for rock chips) and analyzed as follows:

0.5 gms of sample is digested in 1.5 mis HNO~ for Jj hr.

in a hot (90 C) water bath. 0.5 mis HCL is added and the

digestion proceeds for an additional l*s hrs. The solution is

then bulked up to 10 mis with de-ionized water, shaken,

(16)

allowed to settle, and analyzed by Atomic Absorption against

known standards.

Statistical Treatment of Results;

To determine mean and anomalous levels, the geochemical

values obtained from the laboratory (Appendix I) were grouped

into fixed ranges (Tables 2,3). Histograms were drawn to

show the total number of values within each group (Figures 4,

5). A best fit curve is drawn through the majority of the

population so that it approximates a normal distribution

curve.

All metal values higher than those in the main popula

tion were arbitrarily classed as anomalous and eliminated

from further statistical treatment.

In order to define a mean background value and a probably

anomalous threshold, a cumulative frequency graph is drawn

for the non-anomalous population (Figures 6,7). The fiftieth

percentile is defined as the background mean and the value of

the ninety-seventh percentile defines the lower limit of the

probably anomalous population. Table 4 below lists the

anomalous, threshold and mean values for zinc in B soils and

pond and stream sediment.

Table 4 - Anomalous, threshold and mean values for zinc (ppm)

B soils

Pond and Stream Sediment

Anomalous

250

125

Threshold

218

103

Mean

106

60

ltc*

OCD

(O*

cri

S

: N

8"'ls

^NoQ

"^im

40

-itf lb

isQ

^H

t jtfl'Q

t^ *

^ X

***

^''^

Hi-^

-

-t;.: ..i ±*4

i*Stto

itH^ .*

JrW

'*^bto

^t^

^ste o\oe

.--.

:

i! v,. 1 - ki nn ir v i .?M d to "" t m (i s *i, V\ ' K- X li; .10 J.HL IUCH' i x !-' ..-' n; S oioe

(19)

'•J.

8*

l"

\t*

fN

/Od Z 60

PPM Z./MC,

(20)

table 2 - Statistical data for zinc in B soils

Range (ppm)

0-50 51 - 100

101 - 150 151 - 200 201 - 250 251 - 300 301 - 350 351 - 400 401 - 450 451 - 500 7500

Frequency

33 73 78 35 13 6

10 7 3 2

268

Cumulative Frequency

33 106 184 219 232

Cumulative %

14.2 45.7 79.3 94.4

100.0

Table 3 - Statistical data for zinc in pond and stream sediment

Range (ppm)

0-2526 - 5057 - 7576 - 100

101 - 125126 - 150151 - 175176 - 200201 - 225226 - 250251 - 275275 - 300^300 = 3

Frequencyi ———————— * —

35661114-21-

Cumulative Frequency

38

142021

Cumulative \* -,. , . p

14.338.166.795.2

100.0

Results of the Soil Geochemistry Survey

Soil sample locations and the zinc values obtained are

shown on Plan 2. Zinc contours are shown on Plan 3.

Zinc values range from 5 to 910 ppm, with a mean value

of 106 ppm and an anomalous level of 250 ppm.

Except for one exception, all zinc values over 400 ppm

were found over the two major marble units. It is apparent

(21)

the marble has a higher background level than the other

rock units for zinc. Zinc values are low northwest of the

Otter Creek Lakes and in the southeast in the vicinity of

the Lingham Lakes.

There are two significant anomalies. Anomaly l is in

the extreme northeast corner of the grid. There are 8 samples

over 400 ppm, all of which had the highest value obtained--

910 ppm. This appears to be a glacial dispersion fan from

mineralization located up-ice, further to the northeast.

No zinc mineralization was noted in the area of the soil

anomaly.

Anomaly 2 consists of three samples along a strike length

of 2000 feet which range from 600 ppm to 735 ppm. These are

located over the marble unit between the central beaver ponds

and the Lingham Lakes. This same marble belt was found to

contain anomalous zinc soil values further to the southwest

by Glenshire Mines Ltd. whose property adjoins Canadian

Occidental Petroleum's claims.

Pond and Stream Sediment Geochemistry;

Thirty-three sediment samples were taken from the edge

of the beaver ponds, swamps and streams on the property. The

samples were usually highly organic, being composed mainly

of roots, fibres and decomposed leaf litter. In some cases

the samples were taken from flooded Ah horizons.

Zinc values ranged from 18 to 620 ppm with a mean of 60

ppm for the normal population and an anomalous level of 125

ppm. The distribution appears to be bimodal, with a second

peak between 175 and 200 ppm. Two-hundred (200) ppm zinc

was considered to be the anomalous level for sediment samples

(22)

si3 OVI

T

too

foO

ox

. - . ...,. ..... ....j

Sif too

VALUE. /A/

2/A/C

(23)

aken from the Otter Creek Lakes.

All the samples taken from the beaver pond south of

the soil anomaly in the northeast corner of the grid were

anomalous. Values ranged from 184 ppm to 620 ppm. There '

were also three anomalous samples from the northeast end of

the Otter Creek Lakes (251 to 390 ppm) which would also

relate to the soil anomaly in this area.

There are also several anomalous values scattered along

the Lingham Lakes chain with a value of 480 ppm. These may

be related to the narrow belt of marble which runs along the

contact with the quartz monzonite in this area.

Rock Geochemistry

The cause of soil anomalies may be due to an abnormally

high metal background in certain rocks and not to sulphide

mineralization. To determine whether this condition existed,

46 rock chip samples were collected at various locations in

the claim area. Table 5 gives the range of zinc values found

in each rock unit.

Table 5 - Range of zinc values in rock chip samples

Rock Unit

5432

la Ib

No. of Samples

133

279 3

Range in ppm

49 - 7.7

22 - 1106 - 150

14 - 116 \ 27 - 40 J

Mean

—

--1435

(24)

tThe greatest range of values is in Unit 2 , the marble.

However, the mean value (14 ppm) is lower than that of

Unit l (35 ppm). Thus, the marble would appear to have a

low background level for zinc, so that the high soil values

are most likely related to zinc mineralization.

(25)

LAKE SEDIMENT SURVEY

Lot 5, Cone. X, XI Lot 6 , Cone. X, XI (East h) Lot l , Cone. IX, X, XI Lot 8, Cone. IX, X

Kaladar ClaimsKaladar Township, Ontario

by D.M. Robertson

Introduction

29 claims covering Concessions IX, X, and XI,

Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, were staked for Canadian Occidental

Petroleum Ltd., during July, 1977, in Kaladar Township,

Ontario, on ground underlain by part of the Clare River

Syncline. Marbles in this structure are potential host

rocks for zinc deposits of the type characterized by the

Balmat-Edwards district of New York and the Long Lake zinc

mine in neighbouring Frontenac County.

The property is located approximately 2 miles

southeast of the village of Kaladar (see Fig. 2). It can

be reached via a narrow, private track which turns off

Hwy. 41, 4 miles south of Kaladar.

66 sediment samples were taken on October 24 and

25, 1977, from the Otter Creek lakes and analyzed for copper,

lead, zinc and loss on ignition.

The locations of the samples and the values obtained

fromtiiem are shown on Plan 4.

The Otter Creek Lakes are a narrow chain of shallow,o

swampy lakes lying between several low parallel ridges of

outcrop on the northwest side of the claims. Most of the

samples taken were very high in decayed organic matter, wood

(26)

fibre and roots. Drainage through the lakes is slow. The

rocks on the northwest shore are amphibolite, those on the

southeast shore are marbles.

Results

Histograms (Figs. 8 and 9) were drawn for each

metal and for the loss on ignition values. The distribution

for zinc is bi-modal. Cumulative frequency curves (Figs. 10

and 11) were drawn for the non-anomalous populations to

determine mean and probably anomalous levels.

Table 6 gives the range of copper, lead and zinc

values and the anomalous and mean levels. These are compared

with stream sediment and rock chip values obtained by

C.F. Gleeson throughout the Clare River Syncline and with the

values obtained by the G.S.C. from several nearby lakes. The

location of the G.S.C. samples is shown on Figure 12.

The high stream sediment and rock chip values are

all down-stream and down-ice from the Otter Creek Lakes. The

zinc values from the Spry Lake showing are also given.

Copper values in the Otter Creek Lakes range from

13 to 80 ppm with an anomalous level of 50 ppm and a mean of

24 ppm. The highest values are from the uppermost lake in

the chain. These values are not especially high, however,

when considered on a regional scale, these values are higher

than the values obtained by the G.S.C. in surrounding lakes

(21 to 58 ppm) but lower than the stream sediment (3-195 ppm)

and rock chip samples (1-120 ppm) .

a^tf^7fry

\

Zo

X

08 O9

\A\

\ V

o

2 1 C-'

1s

A8tS

OS

vs

\

ot

+y

1enO/ C '

-.1: •

90^0

•"OVO r ii-ix'i 01 X r. . HMM M 'lT O1 n l X f l •••) ,M truv\\ii(n . O ' f, ' .:v.3 *\JTn^' M ; ''l!

fOO

007

l

l or* ^

oo/

(OC)

Table 6

Statistical Summary of Lake Sediment Sample Data

Values in ppm

Range Anomalous Meanai-

Ctter Lake sediments 13-80

Clare River Syncline: stream sediments 3-195rock chips 1-120

G. S.Open

Spry

C. lake sedimentsFile 405 Otter Lake 42

Beatty Lake 30

Shirtcliff Lake 43

Donahue Lake 54

Bruno Lake 58

Lingham Lake south 40

Lingham Lake north 45

Raccoon Lake 21

Lake Showing "B" Soils

Bogs Rock chips

Pb Zn Cu Pb Zn Cu Pb Zn

8-245 15-390 50 100 200 24 48 130

5-160 21-505 61 61 211 12 23 1002-96 4-2600

100 40 280

1 159

10 235

6 245

6 300

8 280

2 144

4 190

4 96

49-510094-40,000

11. 6%

(32)

Lead values ranged from 8 to 245 ppm with an

anomalous level of 100 ppm and a mean of 48 ppm. The 245 ppm

value is from sample L-l taken beside a cottage, and can be

discounted due to contamination. The next highest value of 147

ppm is from the extreme upper end of the lakes There is no

concentration of high lead values. These values are much

higher than the G.S.C. values (1-10 ppm) and are approximately

the same as the stream sediment (5-160 ppm) and rock chip

(2-96 ppm) samples.

Zinc values ranged from 15 to 390 ppm, with an

anomalous level of 200 ppm, and a mean of 130 ppm. The highest

value is again probably due to contamination from the cottage.

There is some concentration of high zinc values in the uppermost

lake and one each in the middle and lower lakes. The G.S.C.

zinc values range from 96 to 300 ppm, which is a higher overall

range. The higher stream sediment (21-505! ppm) and rock

chip values (4-2600 ppm) are a reflection of the mineralization

associated with the Spry Lake sphalerite showing.

Table 6 compares the G.S.C. lake sediment values

obtained from above and below the Spry Lake showing. The

values down ice and down drainage are higher than those up ice

and up drainage (the Otter Creek Lakes area).

Conclusion

The detailed lake sediment sampling did not outlinet

any one particularly anomalous area in the Otter Creek Lakes.

Although there are scattered high values, comparisons with the

G.S.C. lake sediment data and stream sediment and rock chip

samples taken earlier by C.F. Gleeson show that this area has

(33)

Table 7

Comparison of G.S.C. lake sediment values above and below Spry Lake Showing__________' ' ____'

Cu Pb Zn

Lingham Lake north 45Otter Lake 42

Lingham Lake south 40

Racoon Lake average

Donahue Lake Bruno Lake Shirtcliffe Lake

average

4l

190159

144

21

37

545843

2

3

686

96147

300280245

up-ice/up-drainage from showing

down-ice/down- drainage from showing

51 275

generally lower values than the area down-drainage and down-ice

from the Spry Lake zinc showing.

(35)

Summary of Anomalies -

Experience at other zinc showings in Grenville marbles

indicates that 400 ppm zinc in soils is a significant

anomalous level. Zinc values of over 1000 ppm are usually

found within several hundred feet of the showings.

Two significant soil anomalies were found in the claim

area, both over marble. The largest and highest value

anomaly (up to 910 ppm zinc) is off the claims to the north

east. Anomalous lake and pond sediment samples were also

taken here.

Three anomalous samples (up to 735 ppm zinc) were also

obtained from the marble belt between the central beaver

ponds and the Lingham Lakes. Glenshire Mines also obtained

anomalous zinc values in soils from this marble belt, further

to the southwest. Thus it would appear that there is a

favourable horizon for zinc mineralization extending through

this unit. More detailed soil sampling is required in this

area to further delineate the anomaly.

Conclusions and Recommendations

Two soil anomalies with significant zinc values were

located in the claim area. Both lie over marbles. The

largest anomaly is off the claims to the northeast and

appears to be due to glacial dispersion from mineralization

located farther to the north or northeast. The second

anomaly lies over the marble between the central beaver

ponds and the Lingham Lakes. More detailed sampling should

be undertaken to more closely delineate this anomaly.

(36)

Further grid cutting is not recommended at this time

as sufficient topographic control is available for mapping

and soil sampling purposes.

Respectfully submitted,

David M. Robertson B.Se. (Hons.)

June l, 1978

- 37 -

APPENDIX I

LABORATORY GEOCHEMICAL REPORTS

- 38 -

BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110

Geochemical Lab ReportExtraction Cut Pb t Za-HNC^-HCl

A. A.Report No.. 2039-7

Method-

Used. -80 soils

Frnm Canadian Occidental Petroleum

Date Hoveriber l* t_____________ 19 77

SAMPLE NO.

L-l

2

3

1*

5

6

m 7i: 8

910

11

12

13

li*

1 ! 15

16

17

- 18

19

tfA 20

21

22

f. -. 23. . ,21*

t, ' 25

f: ! '\' 26

,,,r '•••.. 27J 28

29

30

31

Cu ppm

31

18

23

21

23

19

18

3126

55

69

60

70

53

27

5551*

15

36

33

3l*

26

10

12

13

31

20

20

28

38

1?

Fbppm

21*5

1*2

1*6

8U

31*

1*9

53

3356

33

1*6

36

58

U7

60

18

22

31*

65

31

7U

85

31

3921*

76

60

60

80

56

12

Zn ppm

390

153

172

200

1*5

129

56

28133

93

128

153

251

155

296

180

168

28

131

26

150

163

62

51*

15

163

110

112

292

196

22

SAMPLE NO.

L- 32

33

3U

35

36

37

38

391*0

1*1

1*2

1*3

1*1*

1*51*6

1*7

1*8

1*9

50

51

52

5351*

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

Cu ppm

15

27

27

33

3

50

61

63

23

25

28

33

17

38171*6

26

38

22

27

15

5

81*9

61

1*9

2532

20

21*

21

Pbppm

8

83

65

701*6

17

20

18

501*0

6881*

1*8

no32

63

100

102

62

77

52

39

33

20

28

23

1*8

83

61*

71*

57

Zn ppm

19

202

ll*0

163

36

156

151

161

58

86

633l*0

125

168119

117

181*

200

11*1*

11*1*

67

32

39

131

168

138

5921*7

81*

159

138

t- -~~ -'

BONDAR-CLEGG a COMPANY LTD.

2039-7Geochemical Lab Report

- — neport NO; —————————— ' "ye "i"- ~

1,1 SAMPLE NO.

fc. 636U

1 6566

; j

,E- 'j.

,. . ,,

5 ™

"" ' ;

9

Cu ppm

1636

18

35

L. O.I

Pb ppm

76128

972k

. resul'

Zn ppm

165213

135

9U

s to fo

SAMPLE NO.

Llow.

Extraction.

: faction Used.

- 40 -

BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD,764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA. ONTARIO. K1B OZ5

Geochemical Lab ReportL.O.I. (1+5000)

FA-AA

-80 soils

Report No..

PHONE: 237-311O

2039-7

From.

nate

Canadian Occidental Petroleua

November .19 TT

i SAMPLE NO.

f Ir-1

l'-' : 2 ——————— ~

k

56

1 A 71 81 i Ql ! 101"' ' u

———————— 12 ——13li*

15

16

IT

18'

l ' 19

Q 20

21

1 : 22

1 - 4 23

l : ' 21** :

M 1 25

26

: ______ *L—i 2 8

29

i ———— 20 —*1

L.O.I.J5T.6

26.8

6H.T

85.9

85.6

8H.9

85. T

8H.3

T9.1

8U.9

78.2

79.38H.9

83.9

8H.8

52.3

53.6

85.2

83.7

81.8

80.H

80.5

13.0

29.3

29.0

76.5

69.2

51.7

8H.3

81.6

*-7

SAMPLE NO.

L- 33

33

3U

35

36

37

38

39to1*1

1*2

1*3

1*1*

1*5

1*6

1*7

1*8

1*9

50

51

52

5351*

5556

5758

5960

61

62

L.O.I. *

2.1

71*. 1

73.8

80.31*.8

65.2

59.5

63,785.5

82.2

77.7

63.1

86.2

I. S.

20.1

02.1*

02.7

65.3

55.3

38.6

31.3

8.6

6.5

57.760.3

59.5

85.5

82.0

76.8

70.7

86.9

BDNDXit A

H ~ ^^

1

f

f

i5.V

i

1

t fTt

f; i.i'

f

i!i

.

•ift

'is- it'

i: i

:if

L-i j"

nepori INO. ———————————

SAMPLE NO.

I/-63

61*

65

66

A

. , . . . ,w——,^^—

'

- 41 -

\R-CLEGG S. COMPAN'

Geochemical Lab ReportPageN

L.O.I.5f

83.9

83.263.2

1*6.5

I. S. I -suffi c: ent ean

-

SAMPLE NO.

pie

Y LTD.

2o. ——————————

fxtraction.i-flethod—

- 42 -

BDNDAR-CLEGG S COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1B OZ5 PHONE: 237-311O

Geochemical Lab Report____________ Report No. _________203=18-————.———-.——Zn - HN03-HC1

*' .

Section Used. -80 meshFrom —Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.—

Date April 13,_______________, 9 78

*. ———— ———— ,. ...,

1 SAMPLE NO.J —————————————

|. j K - 30f-l- i -,f;- i 31

1" i 32

f;: i . 33^ —————————— S!* —————————

1; ; 31*

f : 35fcllo: j

jr y1 : 38

i 'i 39*. ty

1*1

i. 1 te1*3

1*1*

^ 1 - 1*5

! i wr i w1*8

A 1*9

goU —— a ——f. i' 52

K - 501

02

03

OH

05

06

OT

08

Znppm

1*8

160

98

27

136

11*3

123

1*6

Tl

66

78

105

208

13l*

160

102

85

103

111*

11*1

11*1*

51

62

81

115

107102

11*9

175

109

60

SAMPLE NO.

K - 509

10

11

12

13

li*

15

16

17

18

19

20

2122

23

21*

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

531*

V - 101

102

W - 01

02

-- an "- 11 r ppm

81*

1*9

1*6

83

103

llH

167

65

102

75

83

11*6

87116

168

115

11*7

68

35ill*

1*0

216

66

5

52

55

337

63

1*8

78

- 43 -

BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.

Extraction.

iMethod—

7B4 BELFAST ROAD. OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5

Geochemical Lab Report__________________. Report No..—————.

PHONE: S37-311O

/i. A.

i Friction Used -80 mesh

395-78

lang'.Man C'ccidor.tal Petroleum-———^I'ay 19 T\lait&t iQ'J

SAMPLE NO.4.

KCO

. Wr rW v'

OC

37

seC-

!^ coGl

r r-f'3

Wr r.

en^7

i ! C3

^c

i 7071

A 7?73

7/!

75ss* — - ———————

7C

77

78

:r | . 72

noPI82

K3

rpr;:

3C3

S??

3-: 4in?141n^ i j."1

117

icn17 r.

327

81

M*

i rn

143

no23

391

3341

45

in133

7r)

52ft

121

136

150

134

138

227

167

.

SAMPLE NO.

K84

85

86

37

seS?

9091

92

93

94

95

96

97

96

99

100

101

102

103

104

IDS105

107

108

109

nem112

113114

— en ———

ppm

5?

?"?

281

427

no2MV'2

1C:)

74

100

167

1?1

Z61

?6

132

19

510

?50

ion

349

495

242106

75

136

104

.'rIO

380

ICC

5795

J;. . i O-W

f: f^'"

BONDAR-CLEGG- 44 -

COMPANY LTD.

395-78 Geochemical Lab ReportReport No.- Page No.-

f SAMPLE NO.

J:; ; K115

| 116!iF :

\ i 1 17

J: , US

j : 119

l ; 120

1 i 121l ; 128St-

f i 123

f ; 124

pA 125f 1^ 1?G

1: 127

•! 1 ?*

i t ; 1^9-; . ——————————t \ ^

1 i m1 ; 132

1 ^ 1 331 134

135i ;

136

l \ 1 37

i 138

W 139t ! 140

1 : ,-. 141

li ' 142

IT ' M^

I - 1^

i 145146

147

I l 148f ^ 535t1 ! 536E - — . ———————————

znpMri

21

112

C3267

74

81

73117

343

347

399159

5QD127

1B4

?13

r/7512723

392505

313

07

92

361C3

7-35

SO620

200

150775

?rn

68226

134

,

SAMPLE NO.

K- 637

S3C

539

540541

542

543

S44545

546

547548

549

550551

552

553

554555

556

557

553559

560

561

562563

564

565566

567

56B

56C570

571

572

inppn94

130

r,7714244

132

156

?35D4

215

021 35

50

184196

92

no100110

124

186

11692

no58

4272

116

03180

370

335

88A?.

130

02

- 45 -

BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD,

Report No.-395-78 Geochemical Lab Report

Page No.-

'ST

t'i'i F

;i;ii-

fc|'j-

t:

i|.

f

lV '

*...

Sr,

1i'

ttfBt:

f

f

!

l

i';

^

k 1

ii

f.

!K

i j! ;;

, i'.i! r-)

i i \ i?"IF-

SAMPLE NO.

K-D73

574575

57C

577573

570

b80

581

582^ 5S3

^ 5S4

6855PC

587

588

5*?

590

591

592599

5945*5

596

A 597

598

59?600

, — -^ — — -—

W- 3

i 4

06

7

89

10

/-li

HPP

112431?4

1PC

270325

5nD

320

128

68135

1?2

470146

1?0

260

130470

205

607G

1461.55

527

215

•110

340775

PO

200

1S4r.?nl"fAO84

480

SAMPLE NO.

w-ii12

13

—— 711 ———

Pflffl

W

46

14C

f^

- 46 -

BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.

Extraction.

traction Used .

764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1Q OZ5

Geochemical Lab Report————————. Report No. _______

_______- From Can&diai

________ Date——^^———-—Majt

PHONE: 237-311O

7.n -

A.A.

-100 nosh

39^-78

a

19 78

1 i SAMPLE NO.

t i A - 1f j . 2

3

MA):;i ;

MB)

f' ' 5

A *"* T

8it-'

j ^ 9I, | 10

1 i nU 12

r i 13t i H*t- -f"; ; 15

16•. : ITt ! 18A 19

In 20i ' - 211, ————————f'; ! 22r 55-^ —

2l|

r i 25j 1 . 26

r Wiiiil : ' !

gu j

I;-

i!

— m —— ppn

8

1*0

27

10

k

12

8

9

20

8

1*0

28

19

35

8

18

138

n16

18

18li*

10

10

530

3'vO

52

9

REMARKS

- 47 -

; |-gG BONDAR-CLEGG SL COMPANY LTD.

i w*"' B.- ' i -Sr 'f

Extraction .

IMftthori.

Fraction Used

b764 BELFAST

Zn-HN03-HCl

A. A.

-80 mesh

ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: S37-311O

Geochemical Lab ReportReport No **35-78

c Canadian OccidentalFrom

May 23

Petroleum Limited

, 9 78f; , - 7.n IT-

1 SAMPLE NO.

(1 K-ll*9

ti ' 150

1' 151

152

153

151*

4ft 155T' 156

15T

1 158

159

160

161

162

163

161*165

166

1 16T

i4ft l681 169

170

1 _ 171

l 172 ~

1 173

f 171*

j ; 175

j - l 176

1 : 1771 ——————————— t i 1781 ——————————— l l 179

ppm

152

1*79

156

76

359

269

62777

161

135

196

125

215

2^7

165

82122

22k

318

309

186

138

111

135

U6

76

1*2

122

163

80

6k

SAMPLE NO.

K-180

181

182

183

18U

185186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

19U

195196

197

198

199

200201

202

203

20U

205

206

207

208

209

210

ppm

311

296

76

80

159

60373

96

169

182

391

159

111

183

186

12056

60

109

600

90122

92

1(2

lOfc

109

76

6U

735

31*

178

BONDAR-CLEGG- 48 -COMPANY LTD,

^• n ., 1*35-78s ••:^F Report No: ———————————

SAMPLE NO.

K-2U

212

213

2lU

215

1 216

217

218

219

220

222

22^

22U

225

226

227

228

229230

231

j 232

233231*

^ 235

236

1 ; 2^7

l 238

239

2l*0

21*1

21*2

21*3

9l,h

2l*5

21*6

Page N

2Jn ppm

8U

362T

101*

18

9062

130

176

122

57

ll*8

90126

69

71*

ll*8

106211*011*5

30

122

ni*152

111*

150

100

81*

12l*

116

150

70

6?98

38

SAMPLE NO.

K-2l*7

2l*82l*9

250

251

252253

251*

255256

257

258259

260

V-lfc

15

16

17

1819

20A

SOB

21

22

23

21*

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Two samp Les W-21

A 81

2o. ——————————

MuTl

ppm

1*1

6681

1*8

60

198119

1*6

6655

193

12176

32

5696

52

260

9672

232

2l*5ll*8

76

158

58

65

18

1*1*

110

22

21

186

receii

fl B by

edidesif

Bondar-(

aated

legg.

- 49 -

BONDAR-CLEGG SL COMPANY LTD.7B4 BELFAST ROAD. OTTAWA. ONTARIO. K1G OZ5 PHONE; 237-3110

Geochemical Lab Report

t Zn-HNO,-HCl (traction vA. A. ethod . .

Report N

From Cj

436-780,

inadlan Occidental Petroleum Limited

1 '. ,, A - 100 mesh n t Ma) 23, 1 Q 78fraction Used . Date ' ., . , 19

l SAMPLE NO.

/\-28

29

30

31

32

33

A *"^ 35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

.^ 47

48

^ 50r -53

54

55

,, i

inppm

116

8

10

15

51

14

63

16

12

15

22

75

22

10

38

18

21

9

36

14

77

10

6

150

9

59

8

no

REMARKS

\l \rft*t

" ;; ""

GEOP2.2727 KALADAR 900

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.J

Type of Survey(s) GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL________Township or Area KALADAR TwP.——————^——————————Claim Holder( s ) CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD.

Survey Company CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD. Author of Report _D. M. Robertson__^______^_______Address of Author 311 - 215 Carllngview Dr., Rexdale, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey April 7 - May 12. 1978_________

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut 25________________________

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.

—Magnetometer-—

—Radiometric__

—Other-.————

DAYS per claim

Geological. 40

Geochemical. 20AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE: June 27, 1978 SIGNATURE:.thor of Report or Agent

Res. Gcol.. .QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date

-D.

Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

See attached list(prefix) (number)

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 29

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS) If more than one survey, specify data for eacli type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——

Profile scale ————

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing ————

Contour interval.

9H W ZO

Instrument

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ____

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument

flnil rnnfignration

flnil separation

Arnirary

Method: C] Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In lineFrpqiipnry

(specify V.L.F. station)

O Parallel line

Parameters measured.

>

o!

Instrument.

Scale constant .—

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy-

l SNhH

Xp*Hq

2Q WuDa •z

tf)

Di

Instrument ————.—.——.

Method D Time Domain

Parameters — On time .^——

- O ff time ..—.

D Frequency Domain

_ Frequency _____

_ Range ^-————,.— Delay time —--—

— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken. 29

Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample Soil. Lake silt. Bog. Rock

{Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight. 50 SITU————————— Method of Cniipriinn Shovel. Lake Bottom

Sampler and HammerSoil Horizon Sampled-

Horizon Development- Sample Depth—————

'B". A.B.C in soil pits Poor^^_^_^____ 6" - 10"_________

Low, Gently Rolling, Well wooded

Drainage Dpyplnprnrnt Ext.ensivp Reaypr

Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness _____ Q - 25 feet ^^__^^

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____ _____-80, -TOO For Rocks-—————.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

D BJD

Ku^^bj)(Zrg Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Others————————————-——-————^—-—.Field Analysis (. .tests)

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -—------—--—- .tests)

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method -

Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (_____O^l_____tests) Name of Laboratory Bondar-Clcgg Co. Ltd.

M11 rt H f* IExtraction MfthnH MINUg " nui.________

Analytical Method. "'"*———^-^-^-^^—--

Reagents Used _____________________

General- General

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method .——-—^——-—-^^—————-—^———^--————————————^.^^^

Corrections made.

RADIOMETK1C

Instrument.Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)_____________________________________- Height of instrument.——————————-—-^^^—————^——Background Count.Size of detector—-^————-—————..—.—-————^^——..-——.——^—————Overburden ——————^——————^—^^^-^—————^^——-^——^^——^—^^

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING E'J'C.)

Type of survey———.—————————^—^———————Instrument ___^_^_________^^__^_Accuracy_____^___^__________^^_^__

Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURV.KYS

Type of survey(s) ———

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-^————-^—————^-^(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used———————^——.—^————-.————^^—.—Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude^—^—————^————-———.^^^^——.————Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

O) 00

Q. S

LJ

Anglesea Twp. (M.43 ) Barrie Twp. (M.50)

Deerock Lake(Rock Lake)

30 ReforestationWithdrawn

from-~fiL-J-

Reserved

for Reforestation

l_____..,

^ — . l 491914

-+91920 491923 L. — - — — — -

RESERVE TReservedfor

Reforestation

503957 ' 503954

50395B ,503956

S. R.O,Reserved

for Public Use

CD O

QL

Oo;-Q CDCc:Q)

Hungerford Twp. (M. 105) Sheffield Twp. (M.150 )

J.Rv

THE-TOWNSHIP

OF

KALADARCOUNTY OF

LENNOX S. ADDINGTON

EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION

SCALE* 1-INCH = 40 CHAINS

LEGENDPATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SALE

LEASES LOCATED LAND

LICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKINGS HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED PATENTED S.R.O.

C.S.

Loc.L.O.

M.RO. S. R.O.

C.

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along t he s hores of all lakes and r ivers.

Original shoreline shown thus:

F R. l. shoreline shown thus:

This Map Is Not To Be Used - FOR SURVEY PURPOSES—

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING, - SURFACE RIGHTS M.R.-MINING RIGHTS

Section____Order No.___Dofe DisPostion File42 !R SO I960) 42(R,S.OI960)

SR.SMR 3053 S R. 37760

SAND and GRAVEL

© M.MR Grovel Reserve No. 240, Grovel File 45432

31CI1NEefc25 2.2727 KALADAR 200

PLAN NO.-M.I08ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF N ATURAL R ESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

NOT MA

MAPPEDNOT

MINERALIZATION

Geological boundary

Bedding or banding

Foliation

A//VA/ Fault

Cut and picketed line36 i

^1 ( 2l

PRECAMBRIAN

Pegmatite dikesQuartz monzonite

-intrusive contact -

GRENVILLE SERIES GROUP Hornblende (biotite) feldspar gneiss Biotite or muscovite schist

Marble

py Pyrite

trem Tremolite

lim Limonite

phlog Phlogopite

qtz Quartz veins

CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTDMINERALS DIVISION

KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TR ONT.

N T.S. - 31 C/ll

/o. O Quartz - feldspar - biotite - gneiss Ib (ffi] Biotite -quartz- feldspar-gneiss

a

—— —— — TrackV" -*

-f^J Cedar swamp

i ..-.-i—.- claim post

GEOLOGY

SCALE l =400

MAY 1978Beaver dam

J-J7j y31C11NE0C25 2 .2727 KALADAR

LEGEND

P b __ Zn

Cu Sample No

ANOMALOUS

>IOOM—m. >200

CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTDMINERALS DIVISION

PROJECT GRENTARIOPROBABLY ANOMALOUS

>I9^KALADAR TP , O NTARIO

N.T.S. 31C/11

LAKE SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MET

May 1976

31CIINEee25 2 .2727 KALADAR 220

LEGEND

B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLESANOMALOUS

CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL P ETROLEUM LTD.MINERALS DIVISION

KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TP ONT.POND AND STREAM SEDIMENTS SAMPLES

ANOMALOUS

B HORIZON SOIL, BOG AND ROCKGEOCHEMISTRY

SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND ZINC VAROCK CHIP SAMPLESPPM

Sample No.

.-—— 4X4 Track

31C11NE8925 2.2727 KALADAR 230

ZINC CONTOURS IN PPM

CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD,MINERALS DIVISION

KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TR ONT.

N.T.S. - 31 C/ll

ZINC CONTOURS

'B' HORIZON SOILS

SCALE l =400

MAY 1978

2.2727 KALADAR 240