financial audit readiness symposium discussion
DESCRIPTION
Financial Audit Readiness Symposium Discussion. Mr. Joe Marshall, SES2, USN Navy Medicine Comptroller Deputy Chief for Resource Management (M8) June 2012. Ground Rules. Listen to understand Speak from the heart Suspend certainty Hold space for difference Slow down the conversation . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Financial Audit Readiness
Symposium Discussion
Mr. Joe Marshall, SES2, USNNavy Medicine Comptroller
Deputy Chief for Resource Management (M8)June 2012
Ground Rules
• Listen to understand • Speak from the heart • Suspend certainty• Hold space for difference• Slow down the conversation
2
Goals for today:
1. Leadership alignment and understanding2. Dialogue3. Background for this week’s sessions3. Actions for when you go home.
Financial Audit in DoDContext: Demand for a clean opinion--instituted by Congressional, DoD and
Navy leaders—is driving change across DoD and NM. • Forces are large and moving quickly. • Changes will touch SG / HQ / Regions / C-Os, but also every clinic, every
supply PO, every Department Head. • Far more than Comptroller & DFA responsibility.
Purpose: to improve the common understanding across Navy Medicine of what is required to support DoD’s audit.
Outcome: Understanding of the actions required—including use of SOPs—to get ready for audit.
3
Financial Audit: FY14NM’s work has been / remains aligned with DoD & NavySECDEF push last fall sets new timelines / requirementsAudit Readiness WG reps from M1, M4, M8, & Regions
Regular meetings are aligning priorities and tackling issues
1 December 2011, VADM Nathan, Navy SG, empowered the group to move forward on the path towards audit readiness.
19 January 2012, Mr. Dennis Taitano, DASN(Financial Operations), aligned efforts with broader Navy-wide initiatives.
13 March 2012, Honorable Gladys Commons, ASN (Financial Management & Comptroller), addressed the urgency of the work.
But NM audit preparations began 4 years ago and continue…4
What Happens in an Audit?
We Assert Auditor will Test Expected Outcomes• Internal controls over
reporting are in place • Financial reports are
prepared accurately• Transactions have
supporting documentation
• Compliance with laws & regulations
• Design & operating effectiveness of internal controls
• Presentation & disclosure of reports
• Supporting documentation of individual transactions
• Compliance with laws & regulations
• Opinion on fair rep of reports & material weaknesses
• Opinion on control effectiveness
• Opinion on compliance with laws & regulations
• Letter w / deficiencies & corrective actions
Independently provide “reasonable assurance” whether financial reports “fairly present” the “truth.”
Auditors are personally liable under the law
5
How Does Management “Assert”?Management tells auditors that financial reports are correct based on the following 5 criteria or ‘assertions’:
Existence & Occurrence
Whether assets / liabilities exist & whether transactions actually occurred
Completeness Whether all transactions & accounts are included
Rights & Obligations Only owned assets & liabilities are recorded
Valuation Whether asset, liability, revenues, & expenses are correct
Presentation and Disclosure Whether financial reports are properly written
What the Assertions Mean to Auditors:
All audits
6
How Do SOPs Help Us Assert?Following SOPs in detail at every activity provides important documentation and controlled processes for all 5 criteria:
Existence & Occurrence
By following the SOPs, I have support for every transaction in STARS-FL that I have generated.
Completeness All Supporting Documents I maintain tie to transactions in STARS-FL.
Rights & Obligations I have properly performed reconciliations in SOPs to ensure all transactions included in STARS-FL are NM.
Valuation I have recorded transactions for the correct amount.
Presentation and Disclosure
I have recorded transactions using the right accounting and execution codes.
What the Assertions Mean to You:
7
How Will Auditors Test Assertions?Effectiveness of Internal Controls & Materiality Are the Focus
Internal ControlIdentifies control activities performed in business processes Assesses control design are risks of misstatement mitigated? Tests operating effectiveness of key controls
Substantive TestingPerforms analytical procedures to determine the reasonableness of amounts & balances Tests dollar amounts on reports by reviewing detailed transactions
If controls are effective, the auditor can reduce the amount of substantive testing performed. But …will have to increase
samples if not going well!! 8
What is Internal Control?Internal Control = reasonable assurance that organizational risks are minimized & is the responsibility of the Commanding Officer.
Control ActivitiesRisks
Controls Objective
sMitigated by Achieved by
Control Objective Examples“Payments only made to authorized vendors for goods actually received.”“Employees are paid only for time worked.”
Control Activity Examples“Accounts payable system compares purchase order, receiving record, & vendor invoice prior to payment.”“Supervisor reviews each employee timesheet for accuracy & authorizes payment via signature.”
Control Objectives = goals.
Control Activities: describe: WHO performs the control WHAT the control is WHERE the control occurs WHEN the control occurs WHY the control is occurring
9
What Are “Must Haves”?These are audit “dealbreakers” that must be addressed BEFORE an audit starts
10
What Are “Must Haves”?These are audit “dealbreakers” that must be addressed BEFORE an audit starts
6 of 8 Supported by SOPs11
DoD’s Audit Timing
Wave 3Wave 3 Wave 4Wave 4
Appropriations Appropriations ReceivedReceived
Statement Statement of of
Budgetary Budgetary Resources Resources
Mission Critical Mission Critical Asset Existence Asset Existence & Completeness & Completeness
Wave 1Wave 1 Wave 2Wave 2
Full Audit Full Audit
Deadlines:Readiness for SBR Audit by 31 March 2014Readiness for full audit by end of FY 2017
DoD’s Audit Strategy: Four Prioritized Waves
12
FY12 FY13 FY14
Assessable Units – Wave 2 Max Assertion Date Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Travel 4 SEP 2012Consumables 3 DEC 2012Reimbursable Work Orders – Grantor
3 DEC 2012
Reimbursable Work Orders – Performer (Non-UBO)
1 APR 2013
Military Payroll (including RPN) 1 APR 2013Contract Administration 1 JUL 2013Non-Federal Receivables (UBO/Medical Treatment)
1 JUL 2013
Federal Receivables (UBO/Medical Treatment)
3 SEP 2013
Civilian Payroll 2 DEC 2013Financial Reporting 2 DEC 2013Funds Management (FBWT) 2 DEC 2013
What are Assertion Deadlines?
Assessable Unit AssertionInterim Progress Milestones (90 Days, 50 %, 75 %)
13
What is the Work to be Done?
Note: The gray boxes are key tasks that must be repeated on a continuous basis as they are key in achieving and maintaining auditability and reliable financial information 14
What is Our Status?Recent Activities Upcoming Activities
• Identified Assessable Units & Assigned Leads
• Conducted Workgroups
• Launched Discovery Phase: Assessing Internal Controls for
Each Unit Updating Process Narratives,
Flowcharts, Control Assessments
• Identify Key Documents
• Test Effectiveness of Internal Controls
• Test Supporting Documents of Individual Transactions
• Evaluate Testing Results & ID Probs
• Develop / Implement Corrective Actions for Deficiencies
15Symposium 4-6 June is audit training for Comptrollers, DFAs, MMDs, & Logisticians .
What Must We Do?1. Implement and use the SOPs exactly as written
• Civilian and Military performance requirement• Clinicians must be engaged with Comptrollers and DFAs
2. Work the issues in the Financial Spotlight Metrics:Obligation validation (otherwise $$ are used inefficiently)Closeout for liquidated obligations over $25K (ditto)Biweekly payroll certification (budget) & employee electronic timesheet verification
& supervisor certificationPurchase card use: can anything move to contract?Location & control of property: wade in.Slow travel claims (>5days) & uncollected travel debt
3. Work other process issues: DEERS Verification (goes directly to fraud control), 2569s for 3rd party collections…and more
16Most importantly—must ask hard questions and lead change among
clinicians, comptrollers and DFAs.
What Do I Do at My MTF?Insist on Transactional Excellence = SOP Use
Internal Controls, Key Supporting Documentation at the Activity Level—not HQSOPs = strong internal controls & proper documentation; required Local modification or adjustment not allowed but seeking feedback
Use Financial Spotlight MetricsProvides benchmark of Audit Readiness
Review Command-Level Testing Results Provides insight into the controls and quality of your transactions
Insist on Corrective Actions…and Follow Up!Be proactive in recognizing & reporting issues; lead change!
17
Failure to Engage
• Inconsistent results from looking at our transactions across Navy Medicine will 1) undercut the SG’s goal for audit readiness & 2) highlight under-performers.
• Outliers = poor internal control & drive ever larger sampling of transactions creating a spiral of ‘ever more’ samples to give auditors assurance of how we do business.
• Consistent results will drive less sampling and cleaner, tighter support of our business processes.
18
This has been exactly the USMC experience that has resulted in protracted audit work and a ‘disclaimer’ for the last 2 years.
Goal: business processes that support care and demonstrate good stewardship over resources—consistently!
Clinicians Impact on Audit• Examples of Different Action or Documentation Required Today:
• Supervisors must certify employee-generated time cards.• Cradle-to-grave documentation for equipment: requirement-to- purchase,
receipt, inventory, and disposal.• Documented requirements for contract staff and services.• Prompt filing of travel claims.• Rigorous ID / insurance screening at front desk.
• High levels of purchase card use providers seeking specific items • …which require additional effort to document. But: equivalents available in
ECAT now…so —why not more ECommerce? • Need active Product Standardization Boards.
19
In many cases, this is compliance with existing requirements that have been ignored or regarded as ‘too hard.’
SOP Spotcheck--Feedback
• Team examined ~150 specific actions for evidence of SOP use at 3 sites.
• Team learned how to ‘ask’ the questions. • Field personnel learned how to ‘answer’ the questions. • Findings: in the 150 items checked, effectiveness varied from 50 to 80%.
• Outcomes: valuable insight on gauging SOP use and how to more effectively assess audit readiness through best practices
• In West: SOP Standdowns for each activity & weekly spotchecks on specific areas
• East has similar actions underway
20Driving SOP use to the next level.
SOP Outreach: Support & Training
Outreach responds to SOP gaps found in training, inspections, etc.
Collaborative team structure: Outreach Coordinator coordinates communication, visibility, & responses for quick resolution
SOP Team documents issues & develops an Action Plan under guidance from the SOP Outreach Coordinator
Outreach Coordinator engages SOP Team, SMEs, and Champions as appropriate in collaboration with Regional and Activity leadership
21
Outreach in Practice: Example
Scenario: During IG visit, it is discovered that the staff at an Activity is using a locally-developed form rather than following the SOP.
What Happens Next?:1.IG SOP Team Outreach Coordinator who provides guidance and works with Champions (Region) to establish extent of issue.2.SOP Team works with SMEs to develop an action plan that includes recommended actions, associated timelines, personnel involved, and follow-up actions.3.Action plan is finalized after discussion with SMEs and Region. 4.Outreach Coordinator maintains visibility of corrective action to ensure follow through.
22
SOP Outreach Coordinators
SOP Outreach Coordinators
Role Name
Deputy Comptroller Capt (s) David Breier
Assistant Deputy Chief Installations & Logistics Mr. David Oliveria
23
Outreach Program POCs: Regional SOP Champions
Regional SOP Champions
Role Name
Navy Medicine East (NME)
Commander RDML Elaine Wagner
Chief of Staff (Acting) Mrs. Susan Herrron
Regional Comptroller Mr. Gavin Wente
Regional Logistician CDR Eskinder Dagnachew
Navy Medicine West (NMW)
Commander RDML Forrest Faison
Chief of Staff CAPT Mark Brouker
Regional Comptroller Mr. Tim Paule
Regional Logistician Mr. Scott Waniewski
Benefits of the Outreach Program Supports all users
Improves quality and training as information and feedback from the field is received and incorporated
Supports audit readiness
Any questions, comments, or input related to the SOP Outreach program can be directed to [email protected]