final leadership survey (1)

8/8/2019 Final Leadership Survey (1)

1/27


2/27


3/27

leadership is the art of

motivating a group of people

to act towards achieving acommon goal. Put even

more simply, the leader is

the inspiration and directorof the action. He or she is

the person in the group that

possesses the combination

of personality and skills that

makes others want to follow

his or her direction


4/27

Design of the study

Statement of the problem

To conduct a leadership survey for the Human Resource Developmendepartment of Bharat Electronics Ltd. Panchkula and analyze its results.

Research objective

In context to General Manager to find out :the leadership styleleadership traits

the managerial roles he performsScopeThe scope of the research is limited to study the leadership of GeneraManager through views of Sr. Executives (Managers and above only) a

Bharat Electronics Ltd. (BEL) Panchkula

LimitationThe outcome of the research cannot be used to identify the leadership styl

of General Manager outside the Bharat Electronics Ltd. (BEL) Panchkula.Moreover the study is totally based on the questionnaire filled up by th

employees and all analysis is done on that basis .No false assumption is there all is based on the statistical data arrived a

after the Survey analysis.


5/27

Methodology

Type of researchDescriptive and causal research methods have been chosen for the

research problem. The descriptive research will help us to determinethe present leadership style of the General Manager. The causal

research will allow us to find out the various factors that influence theExecutives opinion and view about the General Managers Leadership

at BEL, Panchkula.

Sources of the data

Primary data in the form of a questionnaire has been taken for theresearch study. Source of the data are the Sr. Executives working at

BEL, Panchkula.

Sample : entire populationMode of collection of data

For the chosen research problem, self-administered questionnaire hasbeen used to collect the primary data.

Research InstrumentFirst, observation technique has been used in order to arrive at theresearch problem. To find out its solution, questionnaire method has

been used to collect the necessary data.


6/27

ScaleThe scaling used in the questionnaire was

Likert Scale, with 1 referring to strongly

disagree and 5 referring to strongly agree.Likert scale is the most appropriate

mechanism that can be used here because

most of the respondents will find it easier

to relate to the questions on that scale.

This allows more relaxation and a widerchoice while choosing a particular scale

point.

Plan of analysis

The analysis consists of descriptiveanalysis of the results of the leadership

survey. It also includes looking at various

factors that contribute and limits the ability

of the General Manager from being an

efficient and effective leader.


7/27

Question No.N MINIMUM MAXIMUM

SUM AVERAGE STDEV

1

61 1 5

91 1.59 0.535693

2

61 1 5

99 1.67 0.71096

3

61 1 5

96 1.68 0.763578

4

61 1 5

98 1.62 0.551321

5

61 1 5

98 1.56 0.78057

6

61 1 5

93 1.55 0.6746

761 1 5

95 1.55 0.671241

8

61 1 5

88 1.51 0.595653

9

61 1 5

90 1.5 0.808426

10

61 1 5

107 1.77 0.804472

1161 1 5

84 1.39 0.636761

12

61 1 5

91 1.61 0.857463

13

61 1 5

97 1.66 0.84556

14

61 1 5

110 1.89 0.909573

15

61 1 5

130 2.23913 0.903242


8/27

16

61 1 5

248 4.113636 0.80472

17

61 1 5

236 4.093023 0.811493

18

61 1 5

81 1.377778 0.577106

19

61 1 5

106 1.717391 0.892592

20

61 1 5

110 1.847826 0.542208

21

61 1 5

108 1.847826 0.761434

22

61 1 5

90 1.521739 0.648243

23

61 1 5

112 1.954545 0.711844

24

61 1 5

93 1.608696 0.622001

25

61 1 5

91 1.5 0.595062

26

61 1 5

81 1.347826 0.569248

27

61 1 5

83 1.434783 0.517455

28

61 1 5

96 1.630435 0.669801

29

61 1 5

177 3.166667 1.063757

30

61 1 5

122 2.162791 0.64044


9/27

31

61 1 5

143 2.466667 0.761169

32

61 1 5

110 2 0.741966

33

61 1 5

88 1.533333 0.728079

34

V 1 5

100 1.795455 0.767614

35

61 1 5

97 1.659091 0.632121

36

61 1 5

111 1.955556 0.81123

37

61 1 5

102 1.755556 0.738837

38

61 1 5

154 2.738095 1.061097

39

61 1 5

121 2.045455 0.86419

40

61 1 5

101 1.777778 0.617304

41

61 1 5

77 1.340909 0.473432

42

61 1 5

81 1.422222 0.584227

43

61 1 5

226 4.195122 1.058863

44

61 1 5

110 1.888889 0.706073

45

61 1 5

130 2.348837 0.796295


10/27


11/27

From the above table we can draw the following inferences:

4.06

4.08

4.1

4.12

4.14

4.16

4.18

4.2

4.22

AVERAGE

Q.NO.

16

Q.NO.

43

Q.NO.

53

The employees

strongly disagree that

General Manager act

partially.

Also they strongly

disagree that he

refuses to take and

explain necessary

action.


12/27

Analysis by Standard Deviation

1

1.01

1.02

1.03

1.04

1.05

1.06

1.07

1.08

1.09

1.1

STDEV

QNO.29

QNO.38

QNO.43

QNO.53

QNO.57

If we take standard deviation as an analysis parameter then the reaction

of employees that their General Manager talks a lot about special

commendation and promotion for good work is quite variant. This will be

clearer with the following graph


13/27

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 3 5 7 9 11 1 3 15 17 1 9 21 2 3 25 2 7 29 31 3 3 35 3 7 39 4 1 43 45 4 7 49 5 1 53 5 5 57 59 6 1

Chart Title

Series1

We can see from figure that the ratings for this question are widely distributed.This is also evident from the high value of the standard deviation (1.09) .

This means although it has a low average rating of 2.452381, still a lot of

employees have rated it either very high or very low which reflects that it is not

a common view of all the respondents but a thinking of a certain group only.


14/27

S.NO.

KEYS

SCORE

1

DM

2541.6 DECISIONMAKING

2

E

2157.75 EMPOWER,INSPIRE&ENERGIZE

3 C

1717.2 CREATE AN INSPIRING VISION & LEAD BY EXAMPLE

4

IP

1845 INFORMATION PROCESSING

5

IC

1665 INTERPERSONALCONTACT

6B

2287 BUILD AND LEAD A TEAMS

Analysis as per the Managerial Roles Performed by the Leader

Model suggested by:

Henry Mintzberg andJames Collin

See Appendix for Method of calculating the score and Score Index


15/27

SCORE

DM

E

C

IP

IC

B

2541.6

2157.75

1717.21845

1665

2287

DM E C IP IC B

SCORE

SCORE

We can draw the following inferencesfrom the above graph:

The General Manager possesses agreat decision making trait.

He is very proficient in building and

leading a team. He knows how toenergize, inspire and empower people.He is also good at informational

processing either it is internal orexternal.

And to be the best he needs to focus

more on the areas of creating a visionand increasing the interpersonal

contacts with employees.


16/27

Analysis as per

TRAIT LEADERSHIP

THEORY


17/27

Henry Fayol & Charles Bird revealed the

following Traits which are essential ingredients

for Leadership:

ART OF COMMUNICATION

SOCIAL SKILLS

OPEN MINDED AND ADAPTABILITY

FAIRNESS

EMOTIONAL STABILITY

INTELLIGENCE

HUMAN RELATIONS

TECHNICAL SKILLS

MOTIVATION

VISION AND FORESIGHT


18/27

S.NO.KEYS SCORE

1

A 990 A=ART OF COMMUNICATION

2

S 860 S=SOCIAL SKILL

3OA 925 OA=OPEN MIND &ADAPTABILITY

4F 1190.2 F=FAIRNESS

5

E 1587.6 E=EMOTIONAL STABILITY

6

I 1348 I=INTELLIGENCE

7HR 1066 HR=HUMAN RELATIONS

8 T 1062 T=TECHNICAL SKILLS

9M 1061.5 M=MOTIVATION

10 V 950.4 V=VISION

See Appendix for Method ofcalculating the score and Score Index


19/27

990

860925

1190.2

1587.6

1348

1066 1062 1061.5

950.4

A S OA F E I HR T M V

SCORE

SCORE

We can draw the following inferences

from the above graph:

This shows that our General Manager

has an excellent level of emotional

stability and also possesses a high levelof intelligence.

He is quite fair and deals with all

equally, all are same for him.

According to employees their General

Manager is world

s best GM if hebecomes good at social skills, art of

communication. Employees want their

GM to be more open minded and

adaptable as compared to he is.

Moreover, a leader most important trait

is his vision and foresight, which our

manager has to work upon.

He possesses the required technical

skills and also he is good at human

relations. He poses an image of a leader

by motivating the employees.


20/27

S.NO. KEYS SCORE

1 TASK 4253

2 PEOPLE 42134190

4200

4210

4220

4230

4240

42504260

TASK PEOPLE

SCORE

SCORE

4190

4200

4210

4220

4230

4240

4250

4260

TASK PEOPLE

SCORE

SCORE

ANALYSIS AS PER CONCERN FOR PEOPLE / TASK

Hersey & Blanchards Situational Model

From these graph and table we infer that our General Manger is a perfect

blend of the thing called people concern and task concern.

The score itself shows that he takes people(4213) as well as task (4253)into

concern equally, in short he is a man of balance.


21/27

MANAGERIAL GRID

The Blake Mouton Managerial Grid is a practical and useful framework that helps us think about your leadership style. By

plotting 'concern for production' against 'concern for people', the grid highlights how placing too much emphasis in one area

at the expense of the other leads to low overall productivity.

The model proposes that when both people and production concerns are high, employee engagement and productivity

increases accordingly. This is often true, and it follows the ideas of Theories X and Y, and other participative management

theories.

While the grid does not entirely address the complexity of "Which leadership style is best?

it certainly provides anexcellent starting place to critically analyze your own performance and improve your general leadership skills.


22/27

From BLAKE AND MOUTONS

managerial grid we found out

that our General Managerrepresents the best possibleleader traits.

As the managerial grid plotting

shows he lies in the (9, 9) teammanagement region which

represents the ideal position.

CONCLUSION FROM MANAGERIAL GRID

PEOPLE TASK


23/27

THE BEST PART ARISE FROM THIS SURVEY

THAT OUR GENERAL MANAGER IS EXCELLENT

AT DECISION MAKING,EMOTIONAL STBILITY

AND BUILDING AND LEADING A TEAM.

THE AREA OF CONCERN FOR HIM IS

INTERPERSONAL CONTACTS AND HUMANRELATIONS BECAUSE HE HAS JOINED THE

ORGANIZATION RECENTLY(LIMITATION FOR

OUR SURVEY ALSO)

FOR A SMOOTH WORKING OF AN

ORGANIZATION THER SHOULD BE A PROPERBALANCE BETWEEN THE PEOPLE /TASK

CONCERN AND OUR GENERAL MANAGER

HAS MAINTAINED THIS BALANCE.

IN NUTSHELL, HE IS AN EFFECTIVE AND

EFFICIENT MANAGER.


24/27


25/27

Appendix

Questionnaire

Analysis

Keys with core values and their weightagefactors


26/27

Method of calculating the score

FOR PEOPLE AND TASK ORIENTATION

No. of people oriented question in questionnaire=37

No. of task oriented question in questionnaire=23

Weightage factor 37/23=1.61

For final scoreFor people orientation=1*original score

=1*4213=4213

For task orientation=1.61*original score

=1.61*2642=4253

Similar method of score calculation is used for all the other analysis.


27/27

final leadership survey (1)

Documents