final capstone presentation

18
TexFire III Texas Wildfire Aerial Response Optimization Applications of Operations Research Sohum Daftary

Upload: sohumd

Post on 14-Apr-2017

28 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Capstone Presentation

TexFire IIITexas Wildfire Aerial Response Optimization

Applications of Operations ResearchSohum Daftary

Page 2: Final Capstone Presentation

Fire Intensity per County

• Keetch- Byrum Drought Index (KBDI)• Input– Fuel Dryness– Precipitation– Humidity

• Output– 0:800 Scale

Page 3: Final Capstone Presentation

Fire Rate of Spread per County• Output

– Stratified Rate as percent of county area– Expected Value for County Total– Chains per Hour

• Input– Weather– Topography– Fuel

Page 4: Final Capstone Presentation

Aerial Suppression:

Page 5: Final Capstone Presentation

Approach 1: Cost Minimization

Burn Time

Dam

age

Cost

of W

ildfir

e

Assumptions• Logistic growth of

Cost• County (j)• r(j) = rate of fire

spread • K(j) = CostScore• Use Empirics to

Calculate Constant

Approaches

Page 6: Final Capstone Presentation

CostScore

• What is the maximum monetary damage a wildfire can deal?

• Total Market Value of Taxable Property per County– Residences– Minerals– Agricultural Land– Commercial Sites

Page 7: Final Capstone Presentation

Mitigation vs Damage

Optimal Mitigation Cost

Desired Burn Time

• C = Mitigation Cost• NVC = Damage Cost

Page 8: Final Capstone Presentation

Problems

• Unrealistic– Too utilitarian– Costs and Benefits not realized on actor

• Model Set up– Complex– Difficult to isolate in a linear program with Cost

Score function

Page 9: Final Capstone Presentation

Approach 2: Damage Minimization

• Minimize Miles of Fire Burned • Minimize Time to “Stop” the Fire

Page 10: Final Capstone Presentation

Mitigation Plan Assumptions

Page 11: Final Capstone Presentation

Suppression v. Effectiveness

• Suppression – Max Fire Mitigation

• Effectiveness – Scalar on Suppression

Page 12: Final Capstone Presentation

Fire to County Assumptions

• 25 Counties (j)• Nearest Airfield (i)– Determined by TexFire II– Assume Helicopters and SEATs have same rate– Assume Helicopters and SEATs return to same base

Page 13: Final Capstone Presentation

Linear Programming

Skeletal structure of LPSimplex model using Excel Solver, GAMS, or AMPL

Model

Page 14: Final Capstone Presentation

Generalized Network

Flow 1

3

2

Rn

M

M

0

B = 1

Z = 1

Z = 1

3’

2’

1’-x(Rn), -(B)

(0,S)

(0,S)

(0,S)

-x(Rn), -(B)

-x(Rn), -(B)

Page 15: Final Capstone Presentation

ModelDECISION VARIABLES X (j) number of helicopters dispatched from AIRFIELD (i) to COUNTY (j) Y (j)number of SEATS dispatched from AIRFIELD (i) to COUNTY (j)

Page 16: Final Capstone Presentation

Model Summarized

Page 17: Final Capstone Presentation

Results

0 20 40 60 800

1

2

3

4

Count of Fire Burn Times

Frequency

Fire Burn Time (Hours)

Coun

t

Results

SUCCESS!

Page 18: Final Capstone Presentation

Next Steps

• Coverage of all 250 Counties• More accurate assumptions– Multiple county fire breakout– Variable aircraft rates and refuel locations

• Implementation of CostScore Model

Next Steps