fiacs [flanders interaction

44
COMMUNICATION AND CLASSROOM INTERACTION

Upload: ucte-vaikom

Post on 16-Jan-2015

3.022 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fiacs [flanders interaction

COMMUNICATION AND CLASSROOM INTERACTION

Page 2: Fiacs [flanders interaction

2

CONCEPT OF COMMUNICATION

The word communication derives from the latin word ‘communis’ which means common.

Communication is sharing common experience with others.

Communication is the process of passing ideas or feelings from one person to another.

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 3: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 3

DEFINITIONS

Communication is a means of persuasion to influence the other so that the desired effect is achieved.

Aristotle

Communication as the sharing of ideas and feelings in a mood of maturity.

Edgar Dale

Page 4: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023 4dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 5: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 5

COMMUNICATION CYCLES

Four components in the process of communication Sender [S] Message [M] Medium [Md] Receiver [R]

S M Md R

Page 6: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 6

STEPS OF COMMUNICATION

Ideation Encoding Transmission Initiative rests Decoding Responds

Page 7: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 7

TYPES OF COMMUNICATION

SPEAKING-LISTENING WRITING-READING VISUALISING-OBSERVING

Page 8: Fiacs [flanders interaction

CLASSROOM INTERACTION

Page 9: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 9

INTERACTION ANALYSIS

It is an analytical observation technique

Interaction analysis is a process of encoding and decoding the pattern of teaching and learning

Page 10: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 10

H.H. ANDERSON

MEDLEY & MITZEL Observation schedule and record

[OSCAR]

NED A FLANDER 1959-at university of Minnesota

Page 11: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 11

FLANDER’S INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORY SYSTEM

Flanders described interaction analysis as the process of observing, recording & counting events that occur in a situation involving interaction.

Page 12: Fiacs [flanders interaction

FLANDER’S INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORIES [FIACS]

Teacher talk

Response

1 Accepts feeling

2 Praise or encourage

3 Accepts or uses ideas of pupils

4 Asks questions

Initiation

5 Lecturing

6 Giving directions

7 Criticizing or justifying authority

Pupil talkResponse 8 Pupil talk in response to teacher

Initiation 9 Pupil talk initiated by the pupil

silence 10 Silence or confusion

04/10/2023 12dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 13: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 13

1. Accepts feeling:

accepts and clarifies the feeling tone of the students in a non-threatening manner.

Feelings may be positive or negative.

Page 14: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 14

2. Praises or encourages:

praises or encourages student action or behaviour.

Jokes that release tension, not at the expense of another individual, nodding head or saying 'uh huh?' or 'go on' are included

Page 15: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 15

3. Accepts or uses ideas of student:

clarifying, building, or developing ideas or suggestions by a student.

Page 16: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 16

4. Asks questions:

asking a question about content or procedure with the intent that a student may answer

Page 17: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 17

1.Lectures: giving facts or opinions about content or procedures; expressing his own ideas; asking rhetorical questions

Page 18: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 18

1.Gives directions: directions, commands, or orders with which a student is expected to comply.

Page 19: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 19

1.Criticises or justifies authority: statements, intended to change student behaviour from non-acceptable to acceptable pattern, bawling someone out; stating why the teacher is doing what he is doing, extreme self-reference.

Page 20: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 20

Student talk-responses:

talk by students in response to teacher. Teacher initiates the contact or solicits student statement. Student Talk

Page 21: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 21

1.Student talk-initiation: talk by students which they initiate. If 'calling on' student is only to indicate who may talk next, observer must decide whether student wanted to talk. If he did, use this category

Page 22: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 22

Silence or confusion: pauses, short periods of silence and periods of confusion in which communication cannot be understood by the observer.

Page 23: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 23

Page 24: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 24

OBSERVATION PROCEDURE

OBSERVER SITS IN THE CLASSROOM IN THE POSITION BEST SUITED FOR HEAR AND SEE THE PARTICIPANTS.

20-25 OBSERVATIONS PER MINUTE.

OBSERVER WRITES DOWN THE CATEGORY NUMBERS AS THEY OCCUR.

Page 25: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 25

RECORDING OF OBSERVATIONS IN THE CODING CHART

Observer began from silence [10] Observer writes the proper category

number in its correct sequence.

Page 26: Fiacs [flanders interaction

CODING CHART

04/10/2023 26dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 27: Fiacs [flanders interaction

CODING CHART

1022266644455

4555.....

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.10

04/10/2023 27dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 28: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 28

10-2, 2-2, 2-2, 2-6, 6-6, 6-6, 6-4, 4-4 ... …………………etc…

Page 29: Fiacs [flanders interaction

TABULATING A MATRIX

C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 T

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

T04/10/2023 29dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 30: Fiacs [flanders interaction

TABULATING A MATRIX

C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 T

1 I

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

T04/10/2023 30dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 31: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 31

RECORDING OF OBSERVATIONS IN THE CODING CHART

Page 32: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 32

INTERPRETING THE MATRIX1. The proportion of teacher talk, pupil talk,

and silence or confusion.2. The ratio between indirect influence and

direct influence [i/d ratio].3. The ratio between positive reinforcement

and negative reinforcement.4. Student participation ratio5. Steady state cells6. content cross cells7. Constructive integration cells

Page 33: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 33

1. THE PROPORTION OF TEACHER TALK, PUPIL TALK, AND SILENCE OR CONFUSION.

1. Teacher talk [1-7]2. Pupil talk [8-9]3. Silence or confusion [10]

Page 34: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 34

2. THE RATIO BETWEEN NDIRECT INFLUENCE AND DIRECT INFLUENCE [I/D RATIO].

i/d ratio = The sum columns of 1,2,3 & 4

the sum of columns 5,6 & 7

The ratio is much less than one, the teacher exerts direct influence much more than needed.

Page 35: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 35

3. The ratio between positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement.

The sum of columns1, 2 & 3 the sum of columns 6 & 7

If the ratio is 1 or 1<, the teacher is said to have succeeded in providing positive reinforcement.

Page 36: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 36

4. STUDENT PARTICIPATION RATIO

The sum of columns 8 & 9 total sum How much the students have

participated in the teaching learning process

The ratio is far less than one, student participation is very poor

Page 37: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 37

5. STEADY STATE CELLS

The steady state cells along the diagonal from the upper left tro the lower right.

(1-1), (2-2), (3-3), etc…….

If these cells are heavily loaded it shows that the teacher remains in a particular category for more than three seconds.

Page 38: Fiacs [flanders interaction

STEADY STATE CELLS

C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 T

1

2 2-2

3 3-3

4 4-4

5 5-5

6 6-6

7 7-7

8 8-8

9 9-9

10 10-10

T

04/10/2023 38dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 39: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 39

6. CONTENT CROSS CELLS

The cells formed by the number pairs (4-4) and (5-5) are known as content cross cells.

If these cells are over loaded with tally marks, teacher give great stress on subject matter.

Page 40: Fiacs [flanders interaction

C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 T

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

T

04/10/2023 40dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 41: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 41

7. CONSTRUCTIVE INTEGRATION CELLS

The two areas that are most sensitive to the positive and negative aspects of social skill is the teacher student relationship.

Area ‘A’ called constructive integration cells They indicate the positive aspect of the

social skills of the3 teacher. The tally marks in area ‘A’ are few, shows

that the social skill of the teacher is very poor.

Area ‘B’ called the vicious cells. It indicate the negative aspect of the

teacher. The cell(6-6) is not much loaded. That

means he give less commands

Page 42: Fiacs [flanders interaction

C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 T

1

2 A

3

4

5

6

7 B

8

9

10

T

04/10/2023 42dipu, mgucte vaikom

Page 43: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 43

ADVANTAGES1. It is an objective and reliable technique of observing

and analysing the verbal behaviour of a teacher and classroom interaction.

2. It may help in understanding analytically what actually goes on in the classroom.

3. It may help in determining the flow and the pattern of teaching behaviour. By providing feedback, it helps in acquiring the desirable patterns of teaching and modifying ones teaching behaviour.

4. Through the use of this system, student teachers may practice and learn new desirable teaching behaviours quite unknown to the traditional teaching.

5. It suppliments the training technique like micro teaching and team teaching.

6. It can be used for undertaking research in several areas of teaching , teaching behaviour, pre-service and in-service education of teachers.

Page 44: Fiacs [flanders interaction

04/10/2023dipu, mgucte vaikom 44

LIMITATIONS AND DEMERITS

1. The system concentrates on verbal behaviour and does not describe the classroom interaction or teacher bahaviour in its totality.

2. Out of ten categories, seven categories to teachers talk and just three to students talk.

3. The use of this system envisages highly trained observers and interpreters.

4. Equaling silence with confusion is not appropriate.