faffing or fixing? (part 2). straight to theatre? time to laparotomy trauma centre127 mins ncepod200...

15
Faffing or fixing? (Part 2)

Upload: christina-grant

Post on 17-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Faffing or fixing?(Part 2)

Page 2: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Straight to theatre?• Time to laparotomy • Trauma centre 127 mins• NCEPOD 200

mins– NO CT 110 mins– CT 499 mins

• NO CT group unstable• ?Relevance to QE

– 24/7 on site CT radiographers

Delaying surgery or scanning ‘towait for stabilisation’ does not make sense. If the patient isconsidered too unstable for CT scan then transfer to theatreis required instead.

Page 3: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Time to intervention

• On a good day– 45 minutes from

referral

• On a bad day– “Don’t know, I’ll phone

around and get back to you”

– Not available!

Page 4: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

When?

Page 5: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

IR indications

• No good surgical alternative– Aortic transection– Major haemorrhage from pelvic fracture

• Organ preservation– Splenic artery embolization– Selective renal artery embolization

• Vascular trauma– AV Fistula/intimal flap etc

• Many others so ask!

Page 6: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Surgical indications

• Needs a laparotomy anyway– Bowel injury– Gunshot wounds

• Major liver trauma-liver packing

• May need both surgery and IR

Page 7: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Aortic transection

4 Case seriesN 12 5 9 12

Technical success

100% 100% 100% 100%

30 day mortality

8% 0% 0% 16.7%

Mortality surgical series 12-35%

Page 8: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Transection Pitfalls

• Access difficult in female patients– Large diameter

devices– Small iliac arteries

• 4% iliac artery rupture/avulsion rate

• Stent collapse

Page 9: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Pelvic fractures

• Haemorrhage main cause of death

• Main sources– Internal iliac artery

branches– Venous – Bone /soft tissues

• Lethal triad– Unstable fracture– Hypotension– Free abdominal fluid

=83-95% mortality

Page 10: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

QE 29/06/08

Page 11: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Complications• Skin and buttock necrosis

• 165 patients with pelvic fractures embolized for bleeding• 12/165 skin and buttock necrosis• All had bilateral IIA occlusion with gelfoam slurry• 5/12 buttock abrasions+/- gas• 1/12 open fracture• 3 died from buttock sepsis

• Rectal necrosis• Lower limb weakness

Suzuki, Takashi (2005) Clinical characteristics of pelvic fracture patients with gluteal necrosis resulting from transcatheter arterial embolization. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 125(7)

Suzuki, TakashiTranscatheter Arterial Embolization for Pelvic Fractures May Potentially Cause a Triad of Sequela: Gluteal Necrosis, Rectal Necrosis, and Lower Limb Paresis. Case Report Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 65(6):1547-1550, December 2008.

Page 12: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Splenic embolization

• Pros– Avoid splenectomy

• Lifelong risk of overwheming post-splenectomy infection

• Thrombotic tendency

• Complications– Failure – Inadvertent

embolization – Splenic infarction

and/or abscess

Page 13: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

Vascular trauma

Page 14: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

What we need from referrer

• Awareness– Role of trauma IR– Imaging requirements

• Senior level involvement– Consultant A&E,

Surgical and Anaesthetic involvement

• Support

Page 15: Faffing or fixing? (Part 2). Straight to theatre? Time to laparotomy Trauma centre127 mins NCEPOD200 mins –NO CT110 mins –CT499 mins NO CT group unstable

What referrers need from us

• Rapid consistent access to imaging

• All relevant imaging in 1 visit

• Comprehensive IR cover

• A service you can have confidence in