evaluating the performance of salespeople module ten

Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople

Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople

Module Ten

Ingram LaForge Avila

Schwepker Jr. WilliamsProfessional Selling:A Trust-Based Approach

Module 10:Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

1. Discuss the different purposes of salesperson performance evaluations.

2. Differentiate between an outcome-based and a behavior-based perspective for evaluating and controlling salesperson performance.

3. Describe the different types of criteria necessary for comprehensive evaluations of salesperson performance.




Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

4. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of salesperson performance evaluations.

5. Explain how salesperson performance information can be used to identify problems, determine their causes, and suggests sales management actions to solve them.

6. Discuss the measurement Importance of salesperson job satisfaction.




Setting the StageSetting the Stage

1. What were the primary changes Prince made to the performance evaluation process?

2. How did the changes impact City Wholesale’s sales force?

Evaluating SalespersonPerformance at City Wholesale




Purposes of Salesperson Performance EvaluationsPurposes of Salesperson Performance Evaluations

1. To ensure that compensation and other

reward disbursements are consistent with

actual salesperson performance

2. To identify salespeople that might be

promoted

3. To identify salespeople whose employment

should be terminated and to supply evidence

to support the need for termination





4. To determine the specific training and

counseling needs of individual salespeople

and the overall sales force

5. To provide information for effective human

resource planning

6. To identify criteria that can be used to

recruit and select salespeople in the future

7. To advise salespeople of work expectations





8. To motivate salespeople

9. To help salespeople set career goals

10. To relate salesperson performance to sales

organization goals.

11. To enhance communications between

salesperson and sales manager.

12. To improve salesperson performance




Salesperson PerformanceEvaluation Approaches: Conclusions


1. Most evaluate on an annual basis

2. Most combine input and output criteria which are evaluated using quantitative and qualitative measures

3. When used, performance standards or quotas are set in collaboration with salespeople

4. Many assign weights to different objectives and incorporate territory data.






5. Most use multiple sources of information

6. Most are conducted by the field sales manager who supervises the salesperson

7. Most provide a written copy of the review and personal discussion




SalespersonSalesperson

360-Degree Feedback System360-Degree Feedback System

• Salesperson is evaluated by multiple raters

• Helps salespeople better understand their ability to add value to their organization and their customers

Intern

al Custo

mers

Evaluation

EvaluationExternal Customers

Evalu

atio

n

Evalu

atio

n

One

self

Evaluation

Evaluation

Sales Manager

Evalu

ation

Evalu

ation

Team M

embers

Evaluation

Evaluation




Key Issues in Evaluating and Controlling Salesperson Performance

Key Issues in Evaluating and Controlling Salesperson Performance

• Outcome-Based Perspective– Focuses on objective measures of results with little

monitoring or directing of salesperson behavior by sales managers

• Behavior-Based Perspective– Incorporates complex and often subjective

assessments of salesperson characteristics and behaviors with considerable monitoring and directing of salesperson behavior by sales managers




Perspectives on Salesperson Performance Evaluation

Perspectives on Salesperson Performance Evaluation

Outcome-Based

• Little monitoring of people

• Little managerial direction of salespeople

• Straightforward objectives measures of results

Behavior-Based

• Considerable monitoring of salespeople

• High levels of managerial direction of salespeople

• Subjective measures of salesperson characteristics, activities, and strategies




Dimensions of Salesperson Performance Evaluation

Dimensions of Salesperson Performance Evaluation

BehavioralBehavioral

ProfessionalDevelopmentProfessionalDevelopment

ResultsResults

ProfitabilityProfitability

SalespersonPerformanceSalespersonPerformance




Criteria for Performance EvaluationCriteria for Performance Evaluation

Behavior: Consists of criteria related to activities performed by individual salespeople

• Sales calls,

• customer complaints,

• required reports submitted,

• training meetings,

• letters and calls

Should not only address activities related to short-term sales generation but should also include non-selling activities needed to ensure long-term customer satisfaction.





Professional Development:• Assess improvements in certain characteristics of

salespeople that are related to successful performance in the sales job

• Characteristics include - Attitude, product knowledge, initiative and aggressiveness, communication skills, ethical behavior





Results:• Salespeople measured objectively based on

results such as – sales, market share, and accounts

• A sales quota represents a reasonable sales objective for a territory, district, region, or zone

• Some research shows that rewards for achieving results have a negative effect on performance and satisfaction




Market Response FrameworkMarket Response Framework

Salesperson Factors

Characteristics• Role Perceptions• Aptitude• Skill Level• Motivation

Behavior• Effort• Quality

Planning and Control

Unit

Behavior• Effort• Quality

Environmental Factors• Control Unit Attractiveness• Business Position

Organizational Factors• Marketing Effort• Sales Management Effort




Elements Important in Assigning Sales QuotasElements Important in

Assigning Sales Quotas

• Concentration of businesses within the territory

• Geographic size of the territory

• Growth of businesses within the territory

• Commitment by the sales manager to assist the sales representative

• Complexity of products sold




Elements Important in Assigning Sales QuotasElements Important in

Assigning Sales Quotas

• Sales representative’s past sales performance

• Extent of product line

• Financial support (e.g., compensation) a firm provides

• Relationship of product line

• Amount of clerical support





Profitability:• Salespeople have an impact on gross profits

through the specific products they sell and/or through the prices they negotiate for final sale.

• Salespeople affect net profits by the expenses they incur in generating sales.

• Criteria Examples– Net profit dollars

– Gross margin per sale

– Return on investment

– Number of orders secured

– Selling expenses versus budget




Performance Evaluation Methods: Characteristics any method should include

Performance Evaluation Methods: Characteristics any method should include

• Job Relatedness• Reliability• Validity• Standardization• Practicality• Comparability• Discriminability• Usefulness




Performance Evaluation MethodsGraphic Rating/Checklist Methods

Performance Evaluation MethodsGraphic Rating/Checklist Methods

• Salespeople are evaluated using some type of performance evaluation form

• Especially useful in evaluating behavioral and professional development criteria

• May be filled out by customers

• Disadvantage is providing evaluations that discriminate sufficiently




Performance Evaluation Methods: Ranking Methods

Performance Evaluation Methods: Ranking Methods

• Rank all salespeople according to relative performance on each performance criterion

• These methods force discrimination as to the performance of individual salespeople

• May be complex

• Rankings only reveal relative performance evaluation




Performance Evaluation Methods: Objective-Setting Methods

Performance Evaluation Methods: Objective-Setting Methods

Management By Objectives (MBO)

1. Mutual setting of well-defined and measurable goals within a specified time period.

2. Managing activities within the specified time period toward the accomplishment of the stated objectives.

3. Appraisal of performance against objectives.




Performance Evaluation Methods Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)

Performance Evaluation Methods Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)

• Links behaviors to specific results

• Salespeople are used to develop performance results and critical behaviors

• Positive feedback about behaviors may be more affective than positive output feedback




Performance Evaluation BiasPerformance Evaluation Bias

• Occurs when a manager’s evaluation of a salesperson is affected by considerations other than the specified criteria

• Common sources of bias:– Personal relationships– Perceived difficulty of territory– Outcomes (i.e., ends justifies

the means)




Evaluating Team PerformanceEvaluating Team Performance

• Consider the criteria on which members will be evaluated and the methods used to evaluate performance

• Establish a link between team performance and positive outcomes to promote individual and team effort

• May be beneficial to allow team to help develop goals and evaluation criteria




Framework for UsingPerformance Information

Framework for UsingPerformance Information

Determine Sales Management Actions to Eliminate Causes of Future Problems and to Solve Existing Problems

Evaluate Salespeople against Relevant Performance Criteria

Compare Salesperson Evaluations to Identify Problem Area

Investigate Problem Areas to Identify Causes of Performance Problems




Salesperson Job SatisfactionSalesperson Job Satisfaction

• Job satisfaction related to turnover, absenteeism, motivation, and organizational commitment

• Job satisfaction may be related to performance (direction of relationship is unknown)

• INDSALES may be used to measure job satisfaction

• Results may identify areas where manager may intervene to improve job satisfaction

evaluating the performance of salespeople module ten

Documents

salesperson performance

actual salesperson performance

performance stand

performance evaluation

trustbased approach

williams professional

ingramlaforgeavila schwepker

termination slide