establishing the hkjc it pmo isaca forumisaca.org.hk/document/pmo presentation apr 08 (isaca).pdfand...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Establishing the HKJC IT PMO
ISACA Forum
Roland TesmerHead of IT Strategy and PlanningThe Hong Kong Jockey Club
8 April 2008
2
Introduction to HKJC IT
3
Mission
Committed to “One Club, One Team, One Vision”, the IT Division will provide innovative technology solutions that contribute significantly to the Club’s mission and strategic objectives. We strive to become a Value Partner for the Club’s business by pursuing excellence in everything we do.
4
The IT Division handles many projects of all sizes and shapes
Projects range from highly customised bespoke development to vanilla off-the-shelf package implementations
Project effort can range from less than 2 weeks to greater than 4,500 man-months (375 man years)
Project value can range from a few thousand to a few hundred million HK dollars
In any given year we have around 250 IT projects in the pipeline –excluding system maintenance projects
Over 2,100 man-months (180 man years) of project effort is committed each fiscal year on new systems or system enhancements
5
IT division organsation chart – where is our PMO in the structure
IT ARCHITECTURE & INNOVATION
IT STRATEGY & PLANNING
APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT
SYSTEMSASSURANCE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
IT SOLUTIONS & SERVICES
IT OPERATIONS & SERVICES
IT INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
• Planning• Network Services• Systems Services• Enterprise
• Racing• Corporate, Charity &
Security• Membership & Finance• Enterprise• IT Programme Mgt
• CRM & Analytics• Transaction• e-Business• Enterprise Application
• Customer Services• Data Centre Operations• Field Services• Operations Support• Telecom Operations
• Transaction & e-Business• CRM and Enterprise• Systems &
Implementation• Sustaining Engineering
• IT Business Planning • IT Project Services
(PMO)• IT Project Standards
(Effective 1 July 2007)
6
Department organsation chart – the majority of our resources are project and process focused
Roland TesmerHead of IT Strategy &
Planning
ITBP Team Leader
IT ProjectServicesManager
IT ProjectStandardsManager
IT Communications
IT AdminFinance/HRM
Project PortfolioAnalyst
Project ResourceAnalyst
ProcessAnalyst
IT Business Planning
Program ManagementOffice
Project StandardsOffice
IT Training &Development
PM Coaching &Mentoring X 2
Quality AssuranceAnalyst
Total = 14 FTE
PMO/Process/QA = 8 FTE
7
Establishing a PMO at HKJC
8
Do you need a PMO? If the case study below looks familiar then maybe you do!
9
Establishing a PMO... What’s in it for you?
Reduce business risk:Better management visibility of all projectsEstablish consistent standardsImprove predictability and repeatability of outcomes
Optimize resource use:Match skills with demandMonitor resource utilisation Forecast future skills needs
Contribute to business growth:Help maximise the business value of delivered projects Knowing when to give up ... stop throwing good money after bad
10
Classic warning signs at HKJC ... Why we needed to establish a PMO
Project management was fragmented by a silo mindset
Plans were made but not necessarily followed
Work was not tracked against the plan – plans were not adjusted
Requirements were not consistent – changes were not managed
Estimates were way off – over/under commitment was common
Defects were discovered in system test – or worse still, by the customer
Success often relied on the heroic efforts of a few
Repeatability was questionable
11
A PMO is not just an organisational unit or a job role
PMOScope
Ensure projectshave peoplewith the right skills, training andmotivation
Provide project management tools to facilitate key project delivery processes and work activities
Define and maintain project management standards, procedures and methods detailing how projects should be managed
AC
DB
12
The key roles of the HKJC PMO
Standards, methods and best practices
Centralised tracking and reporting for all projects (portfolio mgt)
Project manager mentoring and coaching
Project manager training coordination
Tool selection, implementation and support
Process development, implementation and support (CMMI SEPG)
13
Critical success factors
14
Critical success factor 1: A functioning governance structure is mandatory...
IT Policy / IT Strategy
Execution / Compliance
Sponsorship / Biz Strategy
Management / Compliance
IT PlanningGroup
ITDepartments
STRATEGIC LEVEL
TACTICAL LEVEL
OPERATIONAL LEVEL
ConfigurationPlanning
GroupIT Management
Forum
IT GovernanceCommittee
ForumsProject Teams
CORPORATE LEVEL
DepartmentMeetings
SteeringCommittee
BusinessDivisions
PMO
ITStrategy Committee
Board of Management
IT ArchitectureGroup
15
The IT Planning Group and IT Strategy Committee provide legitimacy and authority for the PMO to act
IT Policy / IT Strategy
Execution / Compliance
Sponsorship / Biz Strategy
Management / Compliance
ITStrategy Committee
Board of Management
IT PlanningGroup
STRATEGIC LEVEL
TACTICAL LEVEL
OPERATIONAL LEVEL
IT GovernanceCommittee
ForumsProject Teams
CORPORATE LEVEL
SteeringCommittee
PMO
16
Critical success factor 2: Methodology, processes and tools are standardised...
Portals are very effective for information dissemination
They provide a simple gateway to an “approved”information repository
They are cheap to build and maintain
They are user friendly and, if well designed, engaging
They minimise the incentive for “C” drive process stockpiles
17
Deliverable templates make the job of process compliance easier
We use our portal to deliver our methodology
Drill down capability is provided from the Level “0”view
Process and procedure assets are aligned to key methodology steps
The Portal tells them what they need to do now – but they can also see what is coming next
18
Critical success factor 3: What gets measured gets done...
All projects have on-line dashboards that report project level performance metrics and statusGreen, yellow and red “traffic lights” communicate healthHigh level visibility
Project dashboard
19
Top line project metrics enable performance to be benchmarked and issues followed up
Defects per project man-month provides a common quality metric that allows different projects to be comparedA threshold value triggers a deeper investigation into below parperformance
Project dashboard
20
Critical success factor 4: Communicate, educate and train...
21
Regular communication at the PM level to share information and motivate improvement
Invite middle level managers to speak to the IT executive teamGive senior IT management an opportunity to provide “leadership”Regular Project Manager Forum for best practice sharingFace-to-face communications sustains interest
Project Manager Forum
22
Training is helping to “enlighten” IT staff and the staff of our business partners
Nine IT Project Managers have successfully achieved Project Management Professional (PMP) certification – a certification program for the remaining PMs is in progress
Over 150 IT and business staff have attended PMO arranged training, i.e. requirements definition, process improvement, inspections/reviews, estimation, etc...
23
Critical success factor 5: Don’t stand still ... invest in and develop your PMO
HP PPM (Hewlett Packard) PPM will help our PMO deliver more effective governance of IT projects and programs
Track and manage user demand
Assign and monitor IT resources
Manage:PipelinesProject budgetsProject costsTrack issues/risks/changesStaff timesheetsStaff utilisationCapacity utilisation
PPM to be launched in July 2008
24
Software estimation tools
SLIM Estimate (QSM, Inc.)
Staffing & Probability Analysis
Avg Staff (people)<Current Solution>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Jan'01
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan'02
Feb Mar
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Avg Staff (people)
8741
R&DC&TWARTY
Milestones 1 - HLDR 4 - SIT 7 - GA 8 - EW
Milestones 1 - HLDR 4 - SIT 7 - GA 8 - EW
SOLUTION PANEL <Cur r ent Solution>
DurationEffortCost
Peak StaffMTTD
Start Date
C&T12.0106
1059.112.01.2
2/5/2001
Life Cycle14.8127
1273.412.02.7
1/1/2001
MonthsMM$ (K)peopleDays
PI=15.1 MBI=2.5 Eff Obj=274
RISK GAUGE <Current Solution>
LC Duration <= 12 Months LC Cost <= 1500 $ KPeak Staff <= 20 ppl Life MTTD >= 3 Days
DurationCost
Peak StaffQuality
% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
CONTROL PANEL <Current Solution>
PI 9.1 21.1
15.1
Peak Staf f 0.5 23.9
12.0
Ef f Obj 0 548
274
Project: B2B site development
To support more effective budgeting, require more accurate estimates at the project proposal stage
Home grown tools have proven to be ineffective while PM estimates are inconsistent and highly experience based
Best-of-breed tool has been acquired to drive consistency and support estimate benchmarking
Will be used to supplement PPM by providing estimate input data on a role basis
Launched in November 2007
25
Results achieved after establishing our IT PMO
QC & UAT Fatal/Critical/Minor SQ Raised per Project Man Month
1.4
2.7
2.0
2.83.1
1.31.7
1.5
4.4
1.51.0
0.6
4.3
1.52.1
2.52.2
2.8
0.8
1.8
4.3
3.73.1
4.0
3.0
3.63.84.1
2.2
0.8
2.93.5
6.1
2.7
5.3
4.1
6.7
2.9
3.6
6.7
3.5
4.4
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Oct-04
Dec-0
4
Feb-
05
Apr-0
5
Jun-0
5
Aug-0
5
Oct-05
Dec-0
5
Feb-
06
Apr-0
6
Jun-0
6
Aug-0
6
Oct-06
Dec-0
6
Feb-
07
Apr-0
7
Jun-0
7Au
g-07
Oct-07
Dec-0
7Fe
b-08
Last Year Average (3.8) SQ Raised / Project Man Month 6 month moving average
Q205Q305
Q405Q106
Q105
Q206Q306
Q406
Q107
Q207 Q307
Q407Q108
Q208
Launched PMPortal + New Methodology
26
Q&A
27
Thank You