equipment & process alternatives above the base case

21
EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

Upload: alexandra-gary

Post on 22-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES

ABOVE THE BASE CASE

Page 2: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

PROCESS OPTIONS

• NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SURVEY

• TECHNICAL EVALUATION TO DETERMINE RISK

• ECONOMIC EVALUATION TO DETERMINE IMPACT

http://www.astm.org/BIZLINK/BusLinkB01/images/line.jpg

Page 3: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

ECONOMIC EVALUATION• CAPITAL COSTS ARE BASED ON A ±20% COST

FOR PURCHASED EQUIPMENT.• OPERATING COSTS ARE BASED ON A ±5%

ACCURACY• CASH FLOW RANGES SHOULD BE DEFINED FOR

THE HIGH AND LOW END VALUE FOR THESE ESTIMATES

• RESULTING SELLING PRICE RANGE INDICATES THE LIMITS FOR CONSIDERING PROCESS REVISIONS.

• NOTE THAT THE EXTREMES OF THE PRICES BASED ON THE CASH FLOW ANALYSES ARE WHAT DETERMINES THE BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS

• ALSO INCLUDE THE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE ALTERNATE TECHNOLOGY.

Page 4: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

GENERAL OPTIMIZATION METHODS

• PROJECTS CAN BE OPTIMIZED ON A UNIT BY UNIT BASIS OR ON LARGER SYSTEMS

• DETERMINATION OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT COMPONENTS IS CALLED A PARETO ANALYSIS

(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~westj/files/cds/individual/Disk2/lectures/08/08t-

pareto.pdf)• THE BASIC IDEA IS TO PUT THE EFFORT IN

THE AREA THAT HAS THE HIGHEST TOTAL RETURN POTENTIAL

Page 5: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

1Pareto Analysis

(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~westj/files/cds/individual/Disk2/lectures/08/08t-pareto.pdf)

• Pareto* Principle provides the foundation for the concept of the “vital few” and a “trivial many”

• Examples:– Quality – a small percentage of defect categories – (causes) will constitute a high % of the total # defects.– Cost – a small percentage of components will constitute – a high % of total product cost.– Others: Inventory, absenteeism, downtime

• *Note: Wilfredo Pareto – 19th Century Italian economist studying wealth who observed that a large proportion of wealth is owned by a small percentage of the people. Pareto principle was later applied to quality by J.M. Juran

Page 6: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

Pareto Analysis(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~westj/files/cds/individual/Disk2/lectures/08/08t-pareto.pdf)

• 80/20 Rule• In quality, this rule suggests that ~20% of defect

categories will account for ~80% of the total number of defects. Example for Bid Preparations

Page 7: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

Pareto Analysis(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~westj/files/cds/individual/Disk2/lectures/08/08t-pareto.pdf)

• Pareto Chart

Page 8: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

Pareto Analysis(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~westj/files/cds/individual/Disk2/lectures/08/08t-pareto.pdf)

• Pareto Analysis may be performed using:• Frequency of occurrence (expressed as a

frequency count or relative frequency %), • Or Total cost,• Or Severity, adverse outcome, or

avoidability• Note: the most frequently occurring item may not

be the most important item to address first

Page 9: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE

• DEVELOP OBJECTIVE FUNCTION• DEVELOP CONSTRAINTS• MATHEMATICALLY OPTIMIZE

http://www.ltponline.com/services_images/lp_graph_lg.gif

Page 10: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS

• CAN BE LINEAR OR NON-LINEAR AND INCLUDE MANY VARIABLES.

Y = Y (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Y ()

http://virtual.clemson.edu/groups/mathsci/graduate/seminar/02_3.jpg

Page 11: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

CONSTRAINTS

• INCLUDE SAME VARIABLES AS THE OBJECTIVE FUNCTION

• CAN BE EQUALITIES – Φ1 = Φ1 (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Φ1 (x)– Φ2 = Φ2 (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Φ2 (x) .– Φj = Φj (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Φj (x)

• OR INEQUALITIES :– Ψ1 = Ψ1 (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Ψ1 (x) ≤ L1– Ψ2 = Ψ2 (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Ψ2 (x) ≤ L2– Ψk = Ψk (x1, x2, ..., xn) = Ψk (x) ≤ Lk

www.britannica.com/eb/art-3028?articleTypeId=1

Page 12: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

CALCULUS METHODS

• BASED ON Y’ = 0 AT OPTIMUM • USING TOTAL DERIVATIVE

• AT THE OPTIMUM, ALL PARTIALS EQUAL ZERO

n

n

dxx

dxx

dxx

d

.....2

2

1

1

0

ix

http://www.math.lsu.edu/~verrill/teaching/calculus1550/optimize.gif

Page 13: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION

Page 14: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

SOLUTION TO HX DESIGN

Page 15: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

SOLUTION TO HX DESIGN

Page 16: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

LA GRANGE MULTIPLIERS

• SIMULTANEOUS SOLUTION OF n EQUATIONS FOR n UNKNOWNS.

• THE FUNCTION TO BE OPTIMIZED HAS THE FORM:

• WHERE THE GRADIENT IS • AND λi IS THE LAGRANGIAN MULTIPLIER

• SET UP AN EQUATION FOR EACH VARIABLE BASED ON THE GRADIANT VECTOR FOR THE SCALAR OF THE OPTIMIZATION FUNCTION:

– WHERE THE UNIT VECTOR IS

0...2211 nny

nx

yi

x

yi

x

yy

...22

11

ii

Page 17: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

LaGRANGE MULTIPLIER APPLIED TO HX EXAMPLE

Page 18: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

HX LaGRANGE SOLUTION

Page 19: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

HX LaGRANGE SOLUTION

Page 20: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

HX LaGRANGE SOLUTION

Page 21: EQUIPMENT & PROCESS ALTERNATIVES ABOVE THE BASE CASE

OTHER OPTIMIZATION METHODS

• FOR MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS– SEARCH METHODS - EVALUATE Y AT

VARIOUS POINTS TO LOCATE THE OPTIMA (MONTE CARLO METHOD)

– TYPES - DICHOTOMOUS SEARCH, FIBONACCI SEARCH, GOLDEN SECTION, MONTE CARLO METHOD

– MAY BE THE ONLY OPTION FOR COMPLEX SYSTEMS