epa’s air priorities

22
EPA’s Air Priorities GA AWMA Regulatory Update Conference May 1, 2014 Beverly Banister Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4

Upload: jalia

Post on 25-Feb-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

EPA’s Air Priorities. GA AWMA Regulatory Update Conference May 1, 2014. Beverly Banister Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 . EPA Regulatory Updates. Clean Air National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EPA’s Air Priorities

EPA’s Air Priorities

GA AWMA Regulatory Update Conference

May 1, 2014

Beverly BanisterAir, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4

Page 2: EPA’s Air Priorities

• Clean Air• National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Update• Mercury Air Toxics Standard• Boiler Rule• Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call• Interstate Transport Rule• Tier 3 Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards Program

• Action on Climate Change• President’s Action Plan on Climate Change• Reducing Carbon Pollution from Power Plants• Additional Climate Change Activities

• Enforcement• EPA’s National Enforcement Initiatives• NSR/PSD• Air Toxics• Energy Extraction• Next Generation Compliance

EPA Regulatory Updates

Page 3: EPA’s Air Priorities

NAAQS Reviews: Status Updates(as of March 2014)

Page 4: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• Revised Primary 8-hr Ozone Standard in 2008 (.075 ppm/8-hr)

• EPA designations for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS effective on July 20, 2012– Litigation on certain final area designations– Petition seeking redesignation of areas designated as

attainment to nonattainment

• 2008 Ozone NAAQS SIP Requirements Rule– Proposed May 29, 2013 (78 FR 34178)– Anticipate final rule in Fall 2014– Attainment plans and demonstrations due July 2015

(Moderate) or July 2016 (Serious and above)

2008 Ozone NAAQS Implementation

Page 5: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• Litigation over current Ozone NAAQS Review

• EPA Tentative Dates– Proposal date – January 15, 2015– Final date – November 15, 2015

• Dates Requested by Litigants– Proposal date – December 1, 2014– Final date – October 1, 2015

• Dates subject to resolution of deadline suit

Current Ozone NAAQS Review

Page 6: EPA’s Air Priorities

2012 PM2.5 NAAQS Designations Timeline

August 14, 2014 120-day letters to States and Tribes

August 29, 2014 Federal Register published

September 29, 2014 Close of public comment period

October 29, 2014 Deadline for State and Tribal comments on EPA's intended designations

December 12, 2014 Final area designations

2015 and beyond Near-road monitors installed and producing data

Page 7: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• Revised Primary SO2 Standard: June 2010 (75 ppb/1-hr)

• SO2 Area Designations and Implementation Strategy released February 2013

• Designations and Implementation Guidance and Assistance– Issued PSD permit modeling guidance documents applicable

to the 1-hr SO2 NAAQS on August 23, 2010 and March 1, 2011– Technical Assistance Documents for modeling and monitoring

issued December 2013– For more information including strategy and guidances visit:

• http://www.epa.gov/airquality/sulfurdioxide/implement.html

2010 SO2 NAAQS Implementation

Page 8: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• Initial nonattainment area designations based on violating monitors,

were effective October 4, 2013– 29 areas in 16 states designated

• Attainment plans due April 2015• Judicial challenges filed for three areas designated NA and regarding EPA’s approach

to designations in general

• Strategy includes two additional future rounds of initial designations based on modeling (2017) and monitoring (2020) data to be submitted by states

• Deadline suits filed by Sierra Club and several states requesting court to order EPA to issue final designations for all remaining areas with timeframes ranging from a couple months to 2 years from date of order

2010 SO2 NAAQS Area Designations

Page 9: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• SO2 Data Requirements Rule

– Objective is to provide information to EPA in an orderly fashion to inform initial area designations for areas not designated in 2013

– Proposal issued April 17, 2014 and final in late 2014

• 1-hr SO2 NAAQS Nonattainment SIP Elements Guidance– Objective is to provide assistance to areas developing their

nonattainment area plans– Draft provided for air agency review in October 31, 2013– Issued in April 2014

• Status of next SO2 NAAQS Review (primary and secondary)– At the beginning stages of the review

2010 SO2 NAAQS Implementation

Page 10: EPA’s Air Priorities

• December 21, 2011: EPA final standards to limit mercury, acid gases and other toxic pollution from new and existing electric generating units (EGUs)• Applicability: Units >25 MW that burn

coal or oil for the purpose of generating electricity for sale and distribution through the national electric grid to the public

• Existing sources: Can have up to 4 years to comply with MATS• Pathway for reliability: Critical units to obtain a schedule with up to an additional year

to achieve compliance

• December 2013: DC Circuit Court of Appeals hears challenges to MATS

• April 15, 2014: The DC Circuit issued its ruling upholding MATS

Mercury Air Toxics Standard (MATS)

http://www.epa.gov/mats/ and http://ferc.gov/media/news-releases/2012/2012-2/05-17-12-E-5.asp

10

The Mercury and Air ToxicsStandards Will Prevent:

Once Implemented(cases each year)

Premature Death Up to 11,000

Chronic Bronchitis 2,800

Heart Attacks 4,700

Asthma Attacks 130,000

Hospital and Emergency Room Visits 5,700

Restricted Activity Days 3,200,000

Page 11: EPA’s Air Priorities

Boiler Rule Updates February 28, 2014 - EPA filed a motion asking

the U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to give the agency time to update a small set of standards that apply to less than 0.5% of all existing boilers and incinerators as well as some standards that affect new incinerators and boilers

March 21, 2011 - EPA promulgated final rules

December 20, 2012 - EPA finalized a specific set of adjustments to the standards

Will avoid up to 8,100 premature deaths, 5,100 heart attacks, and 52,000 asthma attacks

Cost effective, with EPA estimating that Americans will receive $13 to $29 in health benefits for every dollar spent to meet the final standards

Reminders: March 21, 2014: Compliance date for area source boilers under the Boiler MACTJanuary 31, 2016: Compliance date for major source boilers

Page 12: EPA’s Air Priorities

Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call

• 6/30/11– Sierra Club petitioned EPA for rulemaking regarding SSM provisions in State Implementation Plans (SIPs).– Nationally - 39 states & 7 locals noted in the petition

• Includes all 8 Southeastern States & 4 locals

– Settlement set schedule for proposed/final rules, SIP call

• 2/12/13 Proposed rule: – 36 states submit their revised state plans to the Agency.– Revised SIPs will require industrial facilities to follow air pollution

rules during SSM. – 5/14/14 – Deadline for EPA action on final rule completion date– States will have 18 months to submit SIPs following effective date

of final rule

Page 13: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• U.S. Supreme Court granted EPA’s petition for review of the D.C. Circuit’s decision in EME Homer City which vacated the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSPAR)– Oral argument was held on December 10, 2013

• CSAPR requires states to significantly improve air quality by reducing power plant emissions that contribute to ozone and/or fine particle pollution in other states

• On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court reversed the DC Circuit opinion and remanded it back to the appeals court for further proceedings

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is a resounding victory for public health and a key component of EPA’s efforts to make sure all Americans have clean air to breathe. It serves to support the ongoing work to see that air quality in downwind states continues to improve. The Court’s finding also underscores the importance of basing the agency’s efforts on strong legal foundations and sound science. This is a big win for the nation’s public health and a proud day for the agency.”

Gina McCarthy, EPA Administrator

Interstate Pollution Transport Update

Page 14: EPA’s Air Priorities

Tier 3 Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards Program

March 3, 2014 - EPA Finalizes Tighter Vehicle and Fuel Standards to Reduce Emissions

Starting in 2017, Tier 3 sets new vehicle emissions standards and lowers the sulfur content of gasoline, considering the vehicle and its fuel as an integrated system

Emission reductions from the Tier 3 program will lead to immediate air quality improvements that are critically important for States to attain and maintain the existing health-based NAAQS

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/tier3.htm

Page 15: EPA’s Air Priorities

Addressing Climate Change: President’s Action Plan on Climate Change

• June 25, 2013: President announced his plan to cut carbon pollution and prepare the U.S. for the impacts of climate change

Reduce carbon emissions from power plants

Build a 21st Century transportation sector Develop post-2013 fuel economy standards for

heavy-duty vehicles

Cut energy waste from our homes, businesses, and factories

Help states and cities prepare for the impacts of climate change

Lead global efforts to address climate change

http://www.whitehouse.gov/share/climate-action-plan

Page 16: EPA’s Air Priorities

• Proposed standards of performance only apply to new electric utility generating units >25 MW.

• EPA standards of performance for:– Natural gas fired stationary combustion turbines

• 1,000 lbs CO2/MWh-gross for large units (>850

mmBtu/hr)

• 1,100 lb CO2/MWh-gross for smaller units (≤850

mmBtu/hr)– Fossil fuel-fired utility boilers and Integrated Gasification

Combined Cycle units

• 1,100 lb CO2/MWh-gross over a 12-month

operating month period, or

• 1,000-1500 lb CO2/MWh-gross over a 7-year

period

Reducing Carbon Pollution From New Power Plants

New power plants—111(b)

Proposal: September 20, 2013

Public comment period: Extended by 60 days to May 9, 2014

http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution-standards

Page 17: EPA’s Air Priorities

• EPA will issue proposed Federal guidelines in June 2014. In preparation, EPA has:– Worked in partnership with states– Built on states’ leadership and

experience with programs that reduce GHGs

– Begun the process of developing guidelines using an open and transparent regulatory process

– Engaged the public, industry, states and key groups through listening sessions throughout the country

Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants

Existing power plants—111(d) Proposed Guidelines: June 2014Final Guidelines: June 2015State Plans due: June 2016

http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution-standards

Page 18: EPA’s Air Priorities

Additional Climate Change Activities

• Final Mobile Source Emission and CAFE Standardso Extends passenger vehicle program

to model year 2017 through 2025 Average163 grams CO2 per mile,

54.5 mpg in model year 2025

o CAFE standards for medium-sized and heavy trucks Our program will continue to on standards already in place

for model years 2014-18

• 2012 Climate Change Indicators Reporto EPA has compiled an updated set of 26 indicators tracking signs

of climate change

www.epa.gov/climatechange

19

Page 19: EPA’s Air Priorities

EPA’s National Enforcement Initiatives

Cutting Air Pollution That Affects Communities’ Health: MACT Standards

Clean Water: Keeping raw sewage and contaminated stormwater out of waters; Preventing animal waste from contaminating surface and groundwater

Reducing Pollution from Mineral Processing

Assuring Energy Extraction Sector Compliance with Environmental Laws

Reducing Widespread Pollution from Largest Sources : New Source Review and Prevention of Significant Deterioration Sector Focus--Utilities, Cement, Glass and Acid Sectors

Clean Communities: protect people from exposure to hazardous chemicals and require polluters to pay for cleanup of contaminated sites

Page 20: EPA’s Air Priorities

Next Generation Compliance

More effective rules

Advanced monitoring technology

Electronic reporting

Increased transparency

Innovative enforcement

Effective Rules

Advanced Monitoring

Electronic ReportingTransparency

Innovative Enforcement

Page 21: EPA’s Air Priorities

2010 SO2 NAAQS• The air pollution monitoring paradigm

is rapidly changing due to recent advances in: – The development of portable, lower-cost

air pollution sensors reporting data in near-real time at a high-time resolution,

– Increased computational and visualization capabilities, and

– Wireless communication/infrastructure.

The Changing Paradigm of Air Monitoring

Snyder et al., ES&T, August 2013http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es4022602

Page 22: EPA’s Air Priorities

Thank you!

Questions?