epaq a l m tiepaq annual meeting budapest 29.-30.11.2007

35
Examples of construction classifications used in the insurance industry EPAQ A lM ti EPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007 Leo Ronken – General Reinsurance Corporation, Cologne ABerkshireHathawayCom pany

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Examples of construction classifications used pin the insurance industry

EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting

Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Leo Ronken – General Reinsurance Corporation, Cologne

A Berkshire Hathaway Com pany

Page 2: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

W ld id f G RWorldwide presence of Gen Re

MoscowRiga

ParisMilan

ViennaCologne Warsaw

Dublin

London

Copenhagen

Toronto

Stamford

More than 20 otheroffices in North America

B iji

Manchester

Tokyo

TaipeiHong Kong

Beirut

Madrid

Mexico City

Stamford

Seoul

Shanghai

Beijing

Singapore

AucklandSydneyMelbourne

Cape Town

Johannesburg

Buenos Aires

2Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 3: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

10 major reinsurance groups worldwideb 2006 iby 2006 gross premium

28.42 27.34

25

30 Billion USDSource: A.M. Best 08/2007

14.1315

20

12.2710.89

4 73

10

15

4.73 4.00 3.98 3.88 3.74

0

5

Swiss Re

Munich Re

Berkshire Hathaway Re (in

Hannover Re

Lloyds of London

RGA Reins. Group

Everest Re

Transatlantic Re

SCORPartner Re

3Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

e (incl. Gen Re)

Page 4: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Wh d G R d f ?What does Gen Re stand for?

• Core competency: Underwriting, leading to sound and professional risk transfer solutionsleading to sound and professional risk transfer solutions

• Financial strength: Standard & Poor‘s AAA-Rating

• Focus on mutually beneficial client relationship

• Global network of offices

• Well balanced portfolio structure

• Competent advisory and consulting services• Competent advisory and consulting services

4Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 5: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Gen ReFi i l hi hli h f D b 31 2006Financial highlights as of December 31, 2006

Assets USD 41.4 Billion

Consolidated Financial Data

Liabilities USD 30.4 BillionShareholders’ Equity USD 11.0 Billion2006 N t P i W itt *) USD 6 0 Billi2006 Net Premium Written*) USD 6.0 BillionA.M. Best Financial Strength Rating A++S&P Financial Strength Rating AAAS&P Financial Strength Rating AAAMoody’s Financial Strength Rating Aaa

*) Excludes the effect of intercompany transactions with Berkshire Affiliates

5Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Source: General Re Corporation - Consolidated Quarterly Financials

Page 6: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

C d i iCore competency underwriting

• Gen Re employs more than 900 highly skilled and experienced underwriting professionals in more than 50 locations around the worldworld

• Underwriting skills are constantly enhanced through state-of-the art training and developmenttraining and development

• Matrix organization and extensive use of information technology enables implementation of high quality solutions anywhere in the e ab es p e e tat o o g qua ty so ut o s a y e e t eworld.

• Berkshire Hathaway ownership enables us to meet any capacity y p y p yrequirements.

6Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 7: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

P li i R k t C t ti ClPreliminary Remarks to Construction Classes

• Worldwide in some countries national insurance associations recommend on how to classify buildings into construction classesrecommend on how to classify buildings into construction classes

• Some countries/ associations do not give any recommendation

• Normally there is no obligation for an insurer/ reinsurer to follow any recommendation, except the minimum standards set by local authorities and laws

• Examples given in this presentation may not represent the opinion of an individual insurer or reinsurer and may not be used widely even y yrecommended by their association.

7Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 8: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

G l f U d i i i h i i dGoal of Underwriting in the insurance industry

• One of the primary goals of underwriting for any property insurer is to determine the probability and severity of a fire at a given property risk.

• One of the main considerations in making that determination is:

– assigning the proper construction class• What are the materials used?

• What percentage of the structure consists of each kind of material?

• How much damage will the building sustain when exposed to fire?How much damage will the building sustain when exposed to fire?

• Properly identifying the construction class can help the underwriter to rate the risk more accurately.

• The evaluation of the building behavior in the case of a fire base on the fire resistance and the combustibility of the building materials used.

8Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 9: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

S iSome experiences

Loss experience in the past showed:Loss experience in the past showed:

• Damage of a building depends to a large extent on the design of the building:

f t ti f f k– frame construction, roof frameworks

– Roofs

– external wallsexternal walls

– Floors

• For the evaluation of the buildings the insurers have designed construction classes with certain requirements of the individual construction features.

• All construction features needs to correspond to the minimum requirements of a building classa building class.

• Partly better construction elements, e.g. a fire-resistant binder on a support without classified fire resistance, does not improve the classification as “ a

9Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

, pchain is only so strong as its weakest member”.

Page 10: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

P bl f dProblems of today

• Often Insurers no longer consider compliance with Building Regulations asOften Insurers no longer consider compliance with Building Regulations as being sufficient.

• Often insurer requirements are more stringent than the Building Regulations

– Primary aim is property protection ensuring that all elements of construction including roofs shall not significantly contribute to the growth and spread of a fire, either internally or externallyy y

– Building Regulations are seen very much as a minimum standard in terms of the requirements of the construction elements and internal fire protection of a building

Whilst architects may use building regulations to receive approval from the Building– Whilst architects may use building regulations to receive approval from the Building Control Authorities it is unlikely to receive the same degree of approbation from the future building's insurers.

A lt• As a result:

• Some building owners have found themselves in a situation where their building was compliant with all the regulations, but where their insurer

10Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

building was compliant with all the regulations, but where their insurer significantly increased the premium.

Page 11: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

O i i k i k fOverview on constructive key risk factors

• Passive Fire Protection

– Non combustible construction or use of insurer approved building products -walls, roof, floors, linings, insulation materials

– Any insulation panels to be non combustible or insurer approved. – Fire barriers in voids, ducts, cavities and roof spaces – Fire resisting ducts for cables / servicesFire resisting ducts for cables / services – Fire resistant cabling – Fire dampers in air distribution ducts particularly where passing through

t t ll / flcompartment walls / floors – Large capacity buildings compartmented into smaller areas using Fire Break

Walls with any penetrations appropriately protected

11Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 12: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Overview on additional risk factors influencing building fi b h ifire behavior

A ti Fi P t ti• Active Fire Protection

– Appropriate fire extinguishers.

– Automatic Fire Detection with monitored remote signalling to an approved Al R i i C I ll d d i i d b i ll di dAlarm Receiving Centre. Installed and maintained by an installer accredited to insurance rules.

– Insurance approved fire doors/shutters in compartment walls operated via an pp p pAutomatic Smoke Alarm and / or a fusible link.

– Automatic Sprinkler Installation to rules of insurer – e.g. FM, VdS, Apsaid

– Smoke ventilation

12Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 13: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

European classificationsSome Common materials and likely Euro classes

Example Materials Euro class/ Flashover PotentialExample Materials Euro class/ Flashover Potential

• Concrete, Brick Stone, Wool Glass, Wool• A1/ No

• Plasterboard, Cement particle board, Glass Wool – faced, Rock Wool -faced

• A2/ No

• Painted gypsum board, Some fire resistant MDFSome Birch plywood

• B/ No

• Most fire resistant MDF Some European Plywood Phenolic foam (foil • C/ YesMost fire resistant MDF, Some European Plywood, Phenolic foam (foil faced)

C/ Yes

• Expanded polystyrene type A, Polyisocyanurate foam (foil faced), Extruded polystyrene Vinyl wall covering (gravure print)

• D/ YesExtruded polystyrene, Vinyl wall covering (gravure print)

• Polyurethane Foam (laminate faced), Polyisocyanurate foam (sprayed),Wood fibre board (vacuum pressed)

• E/ Yes

13Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

• Expanded polystyrene type N, Untested or fails Euro class E • F/ Yes

Page 14: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

G (C i l T iff)Germany (Commercial Tariff)

Building class 1: Building with non combustible building materials/ construction units not classified under, those not classified as types 2 or 3. The portion of combustible building materials should not exceed 30% on

•FrameworkE l ll f•External wall surfaces

•floor and/or roof areas (excluded roofing felt)

B ildi l 2Building class 2: Building (- complex) totally or partly built with combustible materials/ constructions(exception: 30 min fire resistive construction) including isolations and linings and not classified under building class 3not classified under building class 3.

Building class 3: Building (- complex) with external walls predominantly from wood or roof

14Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Building (- complex) with external walls predominantly from wood or roof not resistant against flying brands and radiating heat.

Page 15: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

G (I d t i l Ri k )Germany (Industrial Risks – no longer officially updated )

• R (Rabattklasse (Credit class)):R (Rabattklasse (Credit class)):

– pillars, columns supports, interior and exterior load-bearing walls at least 90 minutes fire-resistant and made of non-combustible materials.

– Roof girders at least 30 minutes fire resistant, – Nonbearing exterior walls at least 30 minutes fire resistant or made of non-combustible

materials – Roof, not including roof girders, at least 30 minutes fire resistant roof sheathing and made

of non-combustible material without any combustible materials attached to the lower surface, hard roofing (=fire resistant against flying brands and radiating heat)

• N (Neutrale Klasse (Neutral class)):

– Buildings, which do not meet the specifications of construction class R as long as their load-bearing parts are at least 30 min fire resistant or the buildings are predominately of non-combustible materials, hard roofing.

• Z (Zuschlagsklasse (Debit class))

15Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

( g ( ))

– Buildings which do not meet the specifications of construction class N

Page 16: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

ISO P i I (USA)ISO Properties, Inc. (USA)

ISO defines six construction classes for commercial buildings:buildings:

– Frame

J i t d M– Joisted Masonry

– Noncombustible

Masonry Noncombustible– Masonry Noncombustible

– Modified Fire Resistive

Fire Resistive– Fire Resistive

16Presentation for [client/prospect], [date] Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 17: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

F C iJoisted Masonry

Frame Construction Construction

• Exterior walls, floors, and roofs of combustible constr ction or ith

• Exterior walls of masonry or fire-resistive construction rated for notconstruction — or with

exterior walls of noncombustible or slow-burning construction with

construction rated for not less than one hour and with combustible floors and roofsburning construction with

combustible floors and roofs.

• Generally have roof, floor,

and roofs.

y , ,and supports of combustible material, usually wood, and combustible interior walls.

17Presentation for [client/prospect], [date] Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 18: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

FrameFrame

JM

18Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

JM

Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 19: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Noncombustible C i

Masonry Noncombustible Construction Construction

• Exterior walls, floors, and roofs of noncombustible or

• Exterior walls of masonry — not less than four inches thick, or

slow-burning materials

• Building supports of b tibl l

• Exterior walls of fire-resistive construction — with a rating of not l th h dnoncombustible or slow-

burning materials

• Noncombustible or slow-

less than one hour, and

• noncombustible or slow-burning floors and roofs — regardless ofNoncombustible or slow

burning roof decks on noncombustible or slow-burning supports —

floors and roofs regardless of the type of insulation on the roof surface

burning supports regardless of the type of insulation on the roof surface

19Presentation for [client/prospect], [date] Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 20: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

NC

MNC

20Presentation for [client/prospect], [date] Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 21: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

Modified Fire Resistive C i

Fire Resistive C iConstruction

• Exterior walls floors and roofs of

Construction

• Walls: solid masonry, including reinforced concrete not less than fo r inches thickExterior walls, floors, and roofs of

masonry materials less thick than required for fire-resistive structures but not less than four

concrete not less than four inches thick, hollow masonry not less than 12 inches thick , hollow masonry less than 12 inches thick, but not less than eight inches thick with a listed fire-resistance rating of not less than two

inches thick, or

• Fire-resistive materials with a fire-

fire resistance rating of not less than two hours and assemblies with not less than a two-hour fire-resistance rating

• Exterior bearing walls and load-bearing ti f t i ll t b fresistance rating less than two

hours but not less than one hour

• Exterior bearing walls and load-

portions of exterior walls must be of noncombustible materials or of masonry, but exterior nonbearing walls and wall panels may be slow burning, combustible, or with no fire-resistance rating• Exterior bearing walls and load-

bearing portions of exterior walls must be of noncombustible materials or of masonry but

resistance rating.

• Floors and roofs: reinforced concrete not less than four inches thick and assemblies with not less than a two-hour fire-resistance materials or of masonry, but

exterior nonbearing walls and wall panels may be slow-burning, combustible, or with no fire-

rating

• Structural metal supports: Horizontal and vertical load-bearing protected metal supports

including pre stressed and post tensioned

21Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

,resistance rating.

— including pre-stressed and post-tensioned concrete units — with not less than a two-hour fire-resistance rating

Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 22: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

MXP

XP

22Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

XP

Source and pictures: http://www.isopropertyresources.com/

Page 23: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

V b d V k (N h l d )Verbond van Verzekeraars (Netherlands)

• Construction classes recommended:

– FIRE-Resistive

– SEMI-Fire resistive

BASIC CONSTRUCTION– BASIC CONSTRUCTION

– Other 1.

Oth 2– Other 2.

– Other 3.

Other 4– Other 4

23Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 24: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

V b d V k (N h l d )Verbond van Verzekeraars (Netherlands)

• Fire-resistive: load bearing construction concrete, walls concrete/ masonry andFire resistive: load bearing construction concrete, walls concrete/ masonry and roofs of concrete with non combustible insulation in walls and roofs.

• Semi-fire resistive: load bearing construction concrete, walls concrete/ masonry and roofs of concrete with flammable roof insulation onlymasonry and roofs of concrete with flammable roof insulation only.

• Basic construction: Load bearing construction steel skeleton or heavy wood columns/ beams and with non combustible insulation in the walls and on the roofs, facade -/roof material sheets of steel, aluminium, zinc (no sandwich panel with flammable heat insulation!).

• Other 1: load bearing construction as basic construction flammable insulationOther 1: load bearing construction as basic construction, flammable insulation on the roof.

• Other 2: load bearing construction as basic construction, flammable insulation under the roofunder the roof.

• Other 3: load bearing construction such as basic construction, flammable insulation in outer walls or combustible sandwich panel.

24Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

p

• Other 4: worse constructions as described above.

Page 25: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

LPC (G t B it i )LPC (Great Britain)

• Grade 1: Building construction, which should resist a fire for a considerable period of time thus allowing fire fighters adequate time to extinguish the fire before the building suffers severe structural damage.

• Grade 2: Building of non-combustible construction which would not add fuel to fi b t ld l i t th fi f h t i dany fire but would only resist the fire for a short period.

UKGrade 1 2 Hour Fire Resistance (Masonry Non-Combustible)Grade 2 1/2 Hour Fire Resistance (Light Non-Combustible)

Non-grade Combustible Elements (ordinary or Frame)

25Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 26: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

PC (G B i i )LPC (Great Britain)

• Grade 1: • Grade 2:

• Walls including any columns and beams, non-load bearing in-fill panels and internal load bearing walls constructed of

• External walls of non combustible materials and have a fire resistance of not less than half an g

non combustible materials with a fire resistance of not less than 2 hours

• Roofs: non combustible materials with

hour. Beams and columns built into external walls and internal load bearing walls all be constructed of non combustible

special provisions made for external combustible weather proofing and/ or insulation on decks of hollow blocks, concrete or concrete stabs or of

materials

• Roofs: non combustible materials as allowed for Grade 1 buildings or

materials listed. Any columns/ beams or trusses support the roof must be made of incombustible materials and a fire resistance of not less than 2 hours

gmaterials listed e.g. profiled aluminum or galvanized steel coated

resistance of not less than 2 hours

• Floors: according fire break floors with protected openings

• Floors: constructed of non combustible materials and any structure which supports the floors must be non combustible with a

26Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

• Linings and ceilings must be constructed of non combustible materials etc.

must be non combustible with a proviso that aluminum is not allowed

Page 27: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

FOC (G B i i )FOC (Great Britain)

Fire OfficersFire Officers Committee UK

Standard I Heavy non-combustible construction with good vertical and horizontal fire separationp

Standard II

NC walls and floors. Combustible elements may be laid on the floors and may line walls, though there must be no air space between the floor and combustible layer. Floor openings are fire stopped. Horizontal fire separation is not strict.

Standard IIINC walls, floors and roofs but combustible elements may be laid on floors and may line walls. Floor openings are fire-stopped. Horizontal fire separation is not strict.

Standard IVNC walls, floors and roofs but combustible elements may be laid on floors and may line walls. Vertical and horizontal fire separation is not t i tstrict.

Standard V NC walls but floors and roofs have combustible elements. No fire-stopping openings exist.

27Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

BSST Usually used for private dwellings and sometimes small businesses. Usually brick walls with frame floors and roof joists.

Page 28: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

South KoreaSouth Korea

Grade Column/ beam/ floor Roof, Roof Frame Walls

1st Fire Proof Construction

Fire Proof Construction

Fire Proof Construction

2nd Fire Proof Construction

Noncombustible Material

Fire Proof Construction

3rd NoncombustibleMaterial

Noncombustible Material

Noncombustible Material

4th Other Materials than Grade 1 2 34th Other Materials than Grade 1, 2, 3

• The grade of building with sandwich panel walls is the 3rd grade without reference to other main structures. But, grade is the 2nd grade if the building was

28Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

to other main structures. But, grade is the 2nd grade if the building was authenticated as fire proof construction

Page 29: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

JJapan

Special Grade Columns, beams, floors, roofs and roof trusses are all constructed of concrete, Walls are constructred of non-combustible materials

First Grade - Category 1

Columns, beams and floors are constructed of either concrete or steel frame covered by fire-resistive covering materials, Roof, roof truss and walls are constructed of non-combustible materials

First Grade Columns beams and floors are constructed of either bricks rocks or steel frame covered by fire resistiveFirst Grade - Category 2

Columns, beams and floors are constructed of either bricks, rocks or steel frame covered by fire resistive covering materials. Roof and roof truss are constructed of non-combustible materials.Walls are constructed of non-combustible materials.

First Grade - Columns, beams, floors, roof and roof truss are constructed of steel frame covered by fireproofing Category 3 covering materials. Walls are constructed of semi-noncombustible materials.

Second Grade - Category 1

Columns, beams, floors, roof and roof truss are constructed of non-combustible materials other than those categorized in the special grade or the first grade, Wall are constructed of either concrete, concrete blocks bricks or rocksconcrete blocks, bricks or rocks

Second Grade - Category 2 All structures are constructed of wooden frame covered by clay

Second Grade - Columns, beams, floors, roof and roof truss are constructed of steel frame. Walls are constructed ofCategory 3 either noncombustible or semi-noncombustible materials

Second Grade - Category 4

Columns, beams, floors, roof and roof truss are constructed of either wood or steel frame covered by fireproofing covering materials. Walls are constructed of semi-noncombustible materials

Third Grade All buildings other than those categorized in special first and second grades Mainly wood frame

29Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Third Grade All buildings other than those categorized in special, first and second grades. Mainly wood frame construction.

Page 30: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

C dCanada

IBC CanadaIBC Canada6 -Frame and All

OtherIncludes rough case, metal clad, frame and others not more specifically classified.

5 M V Frame b ildings ith brick eneer or stone or other masonr eneer5 -Masonry Veneer Frame buildings with brick veneer or stone or other masonry veneer

4 -Masonry JoistRisks in which the walls are of solid brick, stone, concrete block or hollow tile and roofs are of wood joist construction. This class includes mill type constructionincludes mill type construction.

3 -Non Combustible with Non Masonry Walls

Includes steel on steel buildings and asbestos clad buildings with a steel frameWalls steel frame

2 -Non Combustible with Masonry W ll

Risks in which the walls, partitions, and structural members are of non-combustible construction which do not qualify as fire resistive. Into this category will fall risks with masonry walls and steel deckWalls Into this category will fall risks with masonry walls and steel deck roofs and/or other unprotected structural steel.

1 Fire Resistive

Risks in which the walls, floors, and roof are of masonry, reinforced concrete or other non-combustible material with high fire-resistive

30Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

1 -Fire Resistive ginsulation. Risks with a steel deck roof do not qualify as fire resistive.

Page 31: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

A i (i d i l iff)Austria (industrial tariff)

• Bauklasse 1• bricks and stones (min. 25cm), concrete, reinforced concrete • reinforced concrete frame filled with materials mentioned abovereinforced concrete frame filled with materials mentioned above • reinforced concrete frame with metal sheeting without combustible insulation• steel frame (coated) filled with bricks, concrete or stone

• Bauklasse 2• wooden constructions and unprotected steel frames• reinforced concrete frame with metal sheeting and combustible insulation• steel frame (unprotected)• steel frame (unprotected)• wood frame filled with bricks, concrete or stones

• Bauklasse 3• mixed foundation or wooden foundation• all other building other than 1 or 2

31Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 32: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

S i l dSwitzerland

• Massive:Construction with walls and floors fire resistant, Framework brick, steel (overall fire resistant protected)

• Mixed:C t ti t l ifi d d M i W d/ Pl ti E lConstructions not classified under Massive or Wood/ Plastic. Examples are Wood framework filled with noncombustible materials, Steel-/ concrete constructions with walls of non combustible material or low weight planks with non combustible sheeting (Remark: up to 1/3 woodweight planks with non combustible sheeting (Remark: up to 1/3 wood or plastic as part of a wall are accepted)

• Wood or plastic (> 1/3):Wood or plastic (> 1/3):Wood constructions with walls of wood or other combustible/ non combustible materials as well as low weight planks

32Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 33: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

O h C iOther Countries

• Italy, France, Belgium more complicated building classifications based on the evaluation of each individual construction item

• Lot of countries no recommendation any longer, e.g. South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Denmark, Spain, Portugal use individual company definitions or follow more European or US definitionscompany definitions or follow more European or US definitions

33Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 34: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

O h C iOther Countries

• With the disappearance of insurance tariffs also recommended building classes by association disappeared

I di id l t d l ifi ti f b ildi b I /• Individual assessment and classification of buildings by Insurer/ Reinsurer is more evident

T d f i l lik l t d ib b ildi i it• Today professional surveyor more likely to describe a building in its entire construction features rather than classifying it to a construction class

– Framework and wall including insulation and claddings

– Construction of inner and non-load

– Roof frame and cladding including insulation

– No of floors and its construction

34Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

Page 35: EPAQ A l M tiEPAQ Annual Meeting Budapest 29.-30.11.2007

SSummary

• There are different classification systems for building constructionsThere are different classification systems for building constructions recommended by national insurance associations

• Finally each insurance / reinsurance company has developed its own y p y pconstruction classification systems, often based on recommended classifications systems however adjusted to their own experience

M t i t tl f i / i i t t k th b tibilit• Most importantly for insurer/ reinsurer is to get known the combustibility of a material and if a construction/ part is fire resistive

• It is always a starting point to look onto the demands of national• It is always a starting point to look onto the demands of national authorities for building constructions, however insurer regard them often only as minimum requirements. Usually requirements of an insurer/ reinsurer higher than of local authoritiesreinsurer higher than of local authorities

• Consequentially the recommendation to everyone involved in a construction of a building is to contact as early as possible the insurer

35Presentation for [client/prospect], [date]

g y pand check with him his requirements and recommendations