environmental pricing initiatives harry kitchen department of economics trent university...
TRANSCRIPT
Environmental Pricing Initiatives
Harry KitchenDepartment of Economics
Trent UniversityPeterborough, Ontario
Current ToolsUser fees:• designed to raise revenues rather than to
ration services efficiently.• fail to include environmental/social costsLocal taxes and infrastructure charges:• seldom designed with efficiency objectives • do not include environmental/social costs
User Fees – For What Services?
• Water and sewage treatment• Solid waste collection & disposal• Public transit & transportation• Public recreation
Current Practice - Water
Price structure #of cities % of pop Flat rate 489 23.4
Volumetric 427 76.6Constant 304 45.4Decreasing block 84 7.9Increasing block 39 23.3
** Trends are described in SP’s report
Current Practice - Sewer
• Almost always recovered through surcharges on water bill
• Mainly flat rates even when water is based on volumetric prices
• Sometimes, as a % of water bill
Current Problems with Water/Sewer Pricing
• Many municipalities not metered • Grants often cause problems• Rates do not reflect time of day, season of
year, distance from source• Asset replacement costs often ignored• Opportunity cost not included
Water/Sewer Pricing:What Should Be Done?
• Meters are requiredPrices should include:• asset replacement & opportunity
costs• cost differences due to time of day,
season of year, distance from source
Solid Waste: Fees or Local Taxes?
• Fee per bag/container is most efficient.• Studies show fees lead to less trash,
more recycling & composting. • Fee should cover all operating and
opportunity costs (cost of space, for example) of landfill site.
Public Transit & Transportation• Transit fares - vary by zone & time of use.• May be efficient to subsidize public transit from
road charges • Municipalities should be permitted to:
- tax parking lots- have variable vehicle registration fees- issue differential drivers’ licence fees- impose a municipal fuel tax - impose congestion/toll charges
Infrastructure ChargesDevelopment Charges:• To cover growth related costs • Variable rates should be used when
costs differ across neighbourhoods.
Infrastructure Charges (cont.d)
Tax Incremental Financing Districts:• Used for ‘brownfield’ remediation & city center
revitalization and infilling.• Stimulates private investment in neglected urban
areas.• Divides local tax revenue into two categories – i)
pre-assessed development and ii) increased assessed value.
• Assists in discouraging urban sprawl.
What Is Achieved from Improved Pricing and Taxation?
• Improved resource allocation• More environmentally friendly • Improved fiscal sustainability• Better accountability & transparency• Fair in its impact on users
Key Challenges?Must overcome attitudes re:• the notion that user fees are regressive;• a reluctance to change current accounting
practices;• an expectation that senior governments should
provide grant funding to fund local services;• the importance of proper pricing polices for
efficiency, accountability, transparency and fairness in funding local services.