effects of pulsed rf disturbances on aeronautical ... lil-mul-eucap15-20… · 04/2015 eucap 2015 3...
TRANSCRIPT
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 1
Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technologies (FERMAT)
Effects of Pulsed RF Disturbances on Aeronautical
Communication SystemsEmmanuel Van Lil1, Jo Verhaevert2, Jan De Vos & Dirk Van Troyen3
• 1 Div. ESAT-TELEMIC, KU Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium, [email protected]
• 2 Dept. Industrial Technology & Construction, UGent, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, [email protected]
• 3 Technologiecluster Elektrotechniek, KU Leuven, B-2860 Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium, [email protected]
Abstract: Air Traffic Control (ATC) and their responsible authorities have been always very sensitive to safety of the systems they are using
to guarantee a fool-proof and environmentally safe operation of the facilities to provide guidance for the airplanes. Not only the most
elaborated systems up to RADAR might be influenced by f.i. wind turbines, but even the old standard air-ground aviation communication
systems are prone to interference by other (undesired) signals. This paper deals with the influence of pulsed systems on aviation
communication systems. After simple simulations, measurement campaigns, both in an accredited lab and in the field, and with different
kinds of sources, from continuous over well defined pulsed to random pulsed are described. An qualitative analysis of the inaccuracies of
those measurements is performed and the influence of (shielded and unshielded) spark plug systems on specific aviation communication
systems (still based on Amplitude Modulation (AM)) is explained in detail. To conclude, possible remedies (like a shield or the sensitivity
reduction of the recievers) are proposed.
Keywords: Pulsed RF, EMC, aeronautical communication, spark plug interference.
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 2
References:
• IEC, "CISPR 22: Information technology equipment - Radio disturbance characteristics - Limits and methods
of measurement", 11/1997.
• Iris De Coster, E. Van Lil, Thomas Neubauer and T. Ergoth, “Comparison of indoor penetration
measurements with geometric and Physical Optics Predictions”, Proc. Millennium Conference on Antennas
and Propagation, Davos, Switzerland, 4 p., 9-14 April 2000
• J. MacAlpine en W. Yim, “Computer Modelling of Trichel Pulses in Air”, Conference on Electrical
Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, Virginia Beach, USA, 22-25 October 1995
• ITU-R Recommendation P526-4, , ITU, Place des Nations, 1211, Geneva 20, Switserland
*This use of this work is restricted solely for academic purposes. The author of this work owns the copyright and no reproduction in any form is permitted
without written permission by the author.*
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 3
Effects of Pulsed RF Disturbances on Aeronautical Communication Systems
• Prof. dr. ir. Emmanuel Van Lil, dr. ir. Jo Verhaevert, ing.
Jan De Vos & Prof. dr. ir. Dirk Van Troyen
• KU Leuven, div. ESAT/TELEMIC
• Kasteelpark Arenberg, 10; Bus 2444
• B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee; Belgium
• Web : http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/telemic(/propagation)
• E-mail: [email protected]
• Poster for EUCAP 2015
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 4
Outline
• Introduction
• Theoretical computations
– Would require 495 m for class A
– Actual road was 275 m and no problems were noticed
• Experimental verifications
– Sparks in continuous operation (ignition of central heating
– Sparks in a car
– Measurements of pulses on site
– CW interference
– Effects on communication systems
• Conclusions
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 5
Standards
• Literature essentially EMC/EMI standards• [IEC] IEC, "CISPR 22: Information technology equipment - Radio disturbance
characteristics - Limits and methods of measurement", 11/1997 (Class A 57 dBV/m
>250 MHz & 50 dBV/m between 30 & 250 MHz @3 m; Class B= 10 dB lower)
• [IEC2] IEC, "CISPR 11: Limits and methods of measurement of radio disturbance
characteristics of industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio-frequency equipment",
11/1997
• 72/245/EEC directive till January, 1, 1996
• After January, 1, 1996: “Automotive EMC directive 95/54/EC”
• Definition of a pulse: < 30 sec
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 6
Theoretical computations
• Receiving antennas on 20 m high platforms
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 7
Theoretical computations
• For vertical polarisation: CW class A equipment would
require 495 m
• Nothing was experienced, even if the way was at 275 m
• Now road at 65 m
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 8
Theoretical computations
• Antennas: mostly dipoles (one array of 4) for the civilian
band (118-137 MHz) and cone antennas for military
communications (225-400 MHz)
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 9
Measurements: continuous sparks
• In Open Area Test Site
Ignitition System of a
Central Heating System
kul
vonk
EUT: 1v
File name: vonkv.RES
17. Apr 01 09:47
PAGE 1
Scan Settings (2 Ranges)
|--------- Frequencies -----------||--------- Receiver Settings ---------|
Start Stop Step IF BW Detector M-Time Atten Preamp
30M 300M 50k 120k PK 1ms 10dBLD ON
300M 1000M 50k 120k PK 1ms AUTO LN ON
Transducer No. Start Stop Name
21 30M 1000M BILMV
-20
0
20
40
60
80
dBuV/m
90
30
MHz
1000100
RADEM_B
Mkr : 119.1000 MHz 55.5 dBuV/m
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 10
In Situ Measurements
• Spark Plug Setup
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 11
In Situ Measurements
• Detail of Spark Plug Setup: effects till 120 m (heavy
effects below75 m)
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 12
Analysis of the pulses
• Detail on Spectrum Analyser
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 13
Analysis of the pulses
• Voltage over ignition coil (detail)
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 14
Analysis of the pulses
• Broadband Antenna Voltage (detail)
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 15
Measurement of CW pulses
• Calibrated pulse transmission system
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 16
Measurement of CW pulses
• Problems: heavy depolarisation, due to fences
• Therefor, direct connection transmitter/receiver was testedOpening of the receiver in function of the pulse duration (PRF=500 Hz=15000 t/min 4takt)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-85 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60 -55 -50
Signal level in dBm
Du
rati
on
of
the in
terf
ere
nce in
mic
roseco
nd
s
RX882C On msec
RX882C Off msec
RX908T On msec
RX908T Off msec
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 17
Shielding possible
• Shielding is possible (mesh of 1.66 m attenuates 9 dB)
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Req
uir
ed
att
en
uati
on
in
dB
Distance in m
Extra attenuation in function of the distance to the interferer
Distance
Pattern
Total
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 18
Acknowledgements
• Belgocontrol (= Belgian FAA, ir. Jan Cottyn, ir. Manu
Deklerck, ir. Alain Bruggeman, ir. Luc Lauvrijs)
• B(elgian)I(institute) for P(ost and) T(elecommunications)
(=Belgian Telecom Authority; ir. Freddy Baert)
• Military ATC (Lt. Col. ir. Albert Husniaux, also NATO
RTO co-ordinator)
04/2015
EUCAP 2015 19
Conclusions
• One should use a large amount of caution when dealing
with pulsed signals, both for measurements and
calculations
• For safety also the maximal energy in a pulse is important
• Product of duty cycle times fields is important for reliable
air-ground communications
• Spark plugs can generate disturbances in a wide
frequency band
• Solutions: shielding or reducing sensibility (from 1 to 2
V) or 6 dB.