ed6620powerclassroomofthefuture
TRANSCRIPT
The Nature of the Classroom of the Future
By: Elizabeth PowerEducation 6620Dr. E. Murphy
Memorial University of Newfoundland
3
As a result of web-based
user empower-ment …..
…a paradigm shift in
education….
…of the magnitude of the printing
press!
Learner Centered Pedagogy
18
10, 13
LEARNER -CENTERED ENVIRON
MENTS
Informal
Collaborative
Engaging
MotivatingReal-life Interests
Virtual Teams
Creativity
Involving
Blended
Learner-Centered Pedagogy Integration
17, 19, 22Collaborative Technology
Learner-Centered Pedagogy Integration
Reduce Isolation
Increase Self-Confidence
Variety of Learning
Opportunities
Instructional Opportunitie
s
Inclusion
Collaborative Technology
17, 19, 22
13
Flexibility in Blended Learning
21
Instructor’s lecture on
target topic by
synthesizing various ideas
manifested in learners’
online messages
Learners post
reflections on issues raised by
the instructor
online
Oral presentation
and discussion by learners
Instructor briefly
introduces the topic of
the next session
Learners continue to discuss the previous
topic online
Learners post their prior understanding of the topic at the
next session online
Face-to-Face Online Face-to-Face Face-to-Face
Online Online
In-Class
Off-Class
The Teaching and Learning Cycle – Blended Learning
4
9
Technology
Driven
Blogging
Podcasting
Wikis
Video-conferencing
Chat RoomsMultimedia
Widgets
Research Tools
Social Bookmarking
Personal Web
Technologies
6, 8, 15, 20
5
DEEP APPROACHES TO STUDY
ENGAGE IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY
QUESTION SOURCESVERIFY INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT THINKING
PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES
FREE, OPEN, ADAPTABLE,
USER-FRIENDLY
6, 20
Student
Space
TimeTraining
Parents
E-LEARNING FLEXIBILITY2
16
Picture Smart Word SmartMusic Smart
Self Smart
Logic Smart
Nature Smart
Body Smart
People Smart
Virtual Environment
Reading/ Conferencing
Video Conference
Problem-solving Technology
Digital Research
Virtual Environment
Music/ Collaboration
Individual Learning Environment
Linking Learning
Styles withTechnology
Designing Future Online Courses
Customized &
Personalized
Awareness of
Learner Differenc
es
Integration of
Learning Styles
1, 25
Embrace value of ICT
Innovative Education Programs
Exposure to & Experience with Online Strategies
TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE
14, 24
7
Blogging As
Reflective
Practice
Virtual
School
11
Embrace value of ICT
Blogging as a Reflective Practice
Cyber Practicum
Innovative Education Programs
Exposure to & Experience with Online StrategiesBest
Technological and Pedagogical
Practices
TRAINING the TEACHER of the FUTURE
12, 14, 23, 24
THANK YOU
REFERENCES
1. Battalio, J. (2009). Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 71-87.
2. Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-Learning: What are the real implications for schools? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6 (1), 11-18
3. Cifuentes, L., Sharp, A., Bulu, S., Benz, M., & Stough, L. (2010). Developing a Web 2.0-based system with user-authored content for community use and teacher education. Education Technology Research and Development, 58, 377-398.
4. Chen, W., & Looi, C.( ). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach.
5. Courosa (2010). Networked Teacher. Retrieved November22, 2010, from Tangient LLC. Web site: k12learning20.wikispaces.com
6. Dyson, L., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (2), 250-267
7. Duke WorldPress (2010). Teaching (and Learning) with Google Earth. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Duke World Press Web site: http://sites.duke.edu/blog/2010/01/11/teaching-and-learning-with-google-earth/
8. George-Palilonis, J, & Filak, V. (2009). Blended Learning in the Visual Communications Classroom: Student Reflections on a Multimedia Course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7 (3), 247 – 256.
9. Greenwich Public Schools, (2010). Information Literacy. Retrieved November 22, 1010, from Greenwich Public Schools Web site: www.greenwichschools.org/page.cfm?p=6657
10. Hutchinson, J. (2009). Use of social softare to address literacy and identity issues in second language learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (3).
11. Isenhour, P., Carroll, J., Neale, D., Rosson, M., Dunlop, D. (2000). The virtual School: An integrated collaborative environment for the classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3).
12. Jiyoon, Y. (2008). Cyber practicum: A future practicum classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), 163-165.
13. Kim, K., & Bonk, C. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The Survey says … . Educause Quarterly, 4, 22-30.
14. Ladyshewsky, R., & Gardner, P. (2008). Peer assisted learning and blogging: A strategy to promote reflective practice during clinical fieldwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (3), 241-257.
15. Lee, M., & Hutton, D. (2007). Using interactive videoconferencing technology for international education: The case of ISIS. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (8).
16. Logie, S. (2010). ICT/Glow & Learning Styles. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Illumine Ltd. Web site: www.mind-mapping.co.uk/.../education.htm
17. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Podcasting in higher education: What are the implications for teaching and learning? Internet and Higher Education, 12, 88-92.
18. Maydonik, C. (2010). Learner centered pedagogy. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from http://camilleteaches.com/etec-511/philosophy-of-educational-technology/
19. Mavrou, K., Lewis, A., Douglas, G. (2010). Researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus: The role of the computer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41 (3), 486-501.
20. McElvaney, J., & Berge, Z. (2009). Weaving a personal web: Using online technologies to create customized, connected, and dynamic learning environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35 (2).
21. Otto, R. (2003). Delivery Modes: Time and place. Retrieved November 22, 2010, from Cognitive Design Solutions, Inc. web site: http://www.cognitivedesignsolutions.com
22. Ray, L., & Atwill, K. (2005). The Web and Special Education. Computers in the Schools, 21 (3), 53-67.
23. Sammons, M., & Ruth, S. (2007). The invisible professor and the future of virtual faculty. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4 (1).
24. Sprague, D., Maddux, C., Ferdig, R., & Albion, P. (2007). Online education: Issues and research questions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15 (2), 157-166.
25. Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. (2008). Addressing diverse learner preferences and intelligences with emerging technologies: Matching models to online opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34 (2).