economics: an elite subject for elite universities? an investigation into the changing nature of...
TRANSCRIPT
Economics: an elite subject for elite universities?
An investigation into the changing nature of economics provision in the United Kingdom
Higher Education sector
James JohnstonContact: [email protected]
The rationale for the study
1. Concern over the withdrawal of economics programmes.
2. What these withdrawals tell us about the health of economics as a university subject.
3. And the implications for different parts of the HE system.
2
Research questions
1.What distinguishes retainers from withdrawers?
2.Is economics in danger of becoming an ‘elite’ subject confined to elite universities?
3
Offered
economics in
2012
Did not offer
economics in
2012
Did not offer
economics before
2012
Offered
economics before
2012 (Retainers)
Offered
economics before
2012
(Withdrawers)
Did not offer
economics before
2012
Framework for interpreting the current level of economics provision in the UK HE
Sector (Table 1)
4
The current state of provision of economics programmes in the UK HE sector
What economics programmes do UK universities provide?
• Economics, Business Economics and Financial Economics were by far the most common titles on offer in 2012
• Sixty-six universities (55%) in our sample of 119 universities offered single Economics, Business Economics or Financial Economics
5
Providing ONE of the three options Providing TWO of the three options Providing All three options1.Aberdeen 2.Aberystwyth 8.Bradford
3.Anglia Ruskin 12.Cardiff 15.Coventry
4.Bath 13.Central Lancashire* 30.Kingston
5.Bangor 16.Dundee 44.Plymouth*
6.Birmingham 17.Durham 59.Swansea
7.Bournemouth 18.East Anglia
9.Bristol 21.Essex
10.Brunel 22.Exeter
11.Cambridge 23.Glasgow
14.City 24.Greenwich*
19.East London* 26.Hertfordshire*
20.Edinburgh 27.Hull
21.Essex 29.Kent
25.Heriot-Watt 31.Lancaster
28.Keele 32.Leeds
36.London School of Economics 33.Leicester
37.Loughborough 34.Liverpool
38.Manchester 35.London Metropolitan*
41.Newcastle 39.Manchester Metropolitan*
42.Nottingham 40.Middlesex*
46.Queen Mary 43.Nottingham Trent*
49.Royal Holloway 45.Portsmouth*
51.Sheffield 47.Queen's – Belfast
52.Sheffield Hallam 48.Reading
53.SOAS 50.St Andrews
54.Southampton 57.Surrey
55.Stirling 60.Ulster
56.Strathclyde 62.UWIC
58.Sussex
61.University College London
63.Warwick
64.West of England, Bristol
65. Westminster
66.York
Table 2: Economics provision (‘new’ and ‘old’ universities)
6
Points of interest• In northern parts of the United Kingdom, such as
Scotland, economics exit titles of any sort appear to have been almost entirely removed from the prospectuses of the new university sector
• The best predictor of whether a university offers an economics title is almost certainly whether it is ‘old’ or ‘new’
Paradoxically:
• Three new universities - Coventry, Kingston and Plymouth- offer single honours in Economics, Business Economics and Financial Economics; while only two of the ‘old’ universities offered all three titles
7
The link between the Research Assessment Exercise and the provision of economics
programmes• Of the sixty-six universities identified by us as
offering an economics programme, only 33 (50%) actually had an economics entry in the 2008 RAE
• In contrast, only three of the eighteen new universities which were identified as offering an Economics degree in 2012 - Kingston, London and Manchester Metropolitan - had an economics entry in the 2008 RAE
8
The link between the Research Assessment Exercise and the provision of economics
programmes• When compared to the economics and econometrics
submissions, it is noteworthy that of the 89 entries in the Business and Management UoA in the 2008 RAE, 37 (42%) were new universities
• Similarly, of the fourteen submissions in the Accounting and Finance UoA in 2008, 6 (43%) were new universities
• Both of these proportions are high relative to the Economics and Econometrics UoA where only three of the thirty-five submissions (9%) were from new universities
9
Consequences: intended or unintended?• Given the incentive structure universities face,
this change in priorities should not come as a surprise to economists
• It is an illustration of how national research evaluations have influenced UK universities
Where is this trend leading us?
10
University alliances and economic provision
• Only two of the Russell Group and the 1994 group did NOT offer economics programmes
• Of the “University Alliance” group, 11 out of 23 members offered economic programmes
• Only 8 of the 27 members of the “million plus” group of universities offered economics programmes
11
Retention and impact on performance: withdrawers appear to differ from
retainers1. Table 3 shows what is happening within the
new university sector. In terms of performance.
2. Withdrawers seem to do a little better than retainers in terms of some indicators of institutional performance.
Is there a learning effect?
12
Table 3: New university retainers and withdrawers compared
Indicator of performanceRetainers[1] Withdrawers[2]
Average Entry Tariff 234 245
Average Percentage with a job
after 6 months
55 60
Average Research Assessment
Rating – Business and
Management[3]
1.89 2.00
Average Guardian League
Table Position
82 80
13
Details of the geographic split in the provision of economics programmes since
2003• Table 4 shows 16 universities identified as
withdrawing at least one economics title
• While Table 5 shows ‘new’ university retainers and withdrawers
• ‘Old’ universities (until now) seem to be largely immune from the withdrawal of economics titles
14
Table 4: Economics titles withdrawn between 2003-2012
University Economics Business
Economics
Financial
Economics
1.University of Abertay 2007
2.University of the West of England** 2007 *
3.University of Central England 2003
4.University of East London** 2007 2006
5.University of Glamorgan 2005
6.Glasgow Caledonian University 2007
7.University of Liverpool** 2007
8.Liverpool John Moores University 2009
9.Edinburgh Napier University 2008
10.Northumbria University 2005 2004
11.Nottingham Trent University** 2006
12.Oxford Brookes University 2009
13.University of the West of Scotland 2011
14.Salford University 2009 2009
15.Staffordshire University 2004
16.Teeside University 2004 200515
Table 5: New University retainers and withdrawers (complete)Retainers Complete Withdrawers
1.Anglia Ruskin 1.University of Abertay
2.Bournemouth 2.University of Central England
3.Central Lancashire 3.University of Glamorgan
4.Coventry 4. Glasgow Caledonian University
5.East London 5.Liverpool John Moores University
6.Greenwich 6.Edinburgh Napier University
7.Hertfordshire 7.Northumbria University
8.Kingston 8.Oxford Brookes University
9.London Metropolitan 9.University of the West of Scotland
10.Manchester Metropolitan 10.Salford University
11.Middlesex 11.Staffordshire University
12.Nottingham Trent 12.Teeside University
13.Plymouth
14.Portsmouth
15.Sheffield Hallam
16.UWIC
17.West of England, Bristol
18. Westminster16
Geographic impact of the withdrawal decision
• In addition, there seems to be a distinct north-south divide
• There is no ‘new’ university economics provision above a line from Preston to Sheffield
17
The four interviews
• All four were ‘new’ universities• Two withdrawers and two retainers• The two withdrawers were in the north, the
two retainers were in the south • Anonymity guaranteed• Informal interviews each lasting about 2 hours
at or near the institutions
18
Contrasting experiences
Retainers• Demand for economics
programmes had remained healthy
• Economics had always been part of the Business School
• Economics was strongly supported by senior management
• Economists were very active in School/Faculty business
• Economists brought in significant income from external engagement
Withdrawers• The demand for economics
programmes had fallen considerably over time
• Economics was once a separate section/department
• Economics lacked support from senior management
• Economists were not very active in School/Faculty business
• Economists were less actively engaged in external income generation
19
Conclusions1. ‘Old’ universities have been much less likely to withdraw the
subject than ‘new’ universities.2. Within the ‘new’ university sector, there is a suggestion in
the UCAS data that universities may be responding to the incentives in league tables by altering their suite of programmes to maximise league table positions and that this has led some to remove economics.
3. There is an emergence of a geographical dimension to the provision of economics in the ‘new’ universities.
4. Our small survey has identified five contrasting features distinguishing retainers from withdrawers.
20