dvt with ankle fractures: is thromboprophylaxis warranted? sunit patil jamshid gandhi ian curzon...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
DVT with ankle fractures: Is thromboprophylaxis
warranted?
Sunit Patil
Jamshid Gandhi
Ian Curzon
Anthony Hui
James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough
Background
Thromboprophylaxis for patients in a plaster cast is a standard of care in many European countriesChest (2004), 126:338-400
Incidence of DVT in patients in a plaster - about 20%
Background
Most studies so far have clubbed together patients with soft tissue injuries and fractures
Incidence of DVT is higher in patients with a fracture as opposed to soft tissue injury
Archives of Internal Medicine, 2002
Research Question
What is the incidence of DVT in patients with ankle fractures treated in a below knee plaster cast?
Methods
Prospective study
R&D and Ethical committee approval
Consecutive patients with ankle fractures treated at JCUH
Methods
Patients were identified from fracture clinic
Exclusion criteria: Previous DVT Patients already on thromboprophylaxis Patients treated with methods other than plaster Patients requiring surgery
Ultrasound Colour duplex ultrasound has a sensitivity of 96% and negative
predictive value of 99%Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2006
Doppler ultrasound is the most universally accepted diagnostic test for lower extremity DVTACCP guidelines, 2004
Ultrasound
Scans were performed by one of the two experienced musculoskeletal ultrasound technicians
Philips IU22 duplex colour doppler ultrasound
Above knee DVT
Below knee DVT
Repeat scan at 1/52
Anti-coagulate
Treated as per consultant
Protocol for patients with DVT
Results 112 patients
8 declined to participate
3 required ORIF
1 was started on prophylactic LMWH by geriatrician
100 patients
Results Males: 51 Females: 49
Mean age: 43 years (16-79)
Mean BMI: 28 (18-51)
Smokers: 29
Mean duration of plaster cast: 6/52 (3-7)
DVT
Superficial femoral vein: 1
Popliteal vein: 1
Posterior tibial vein + peroneal vein: 1
Peroneal vein: 2
DVT
All 5 were asymptomatic and had no clinical signs of DVT
All 5 were FWB during the period of immobilisation
DVTAge, Sex Predisposing factors
67, F None
53, M BMI=31.6, smoker
18, F BMI=28.3, smoker
69, F BMI=37.3
44, M BMI=28.4, smoker
Results
None of the DVTs propagated on a scan done a week later
None developed symptoms or signs of PE
Discussion
Annual incidence of DVT in the western population is 0.1%Silverstein et al; Archives of Internal Medicine, 1998.
Cumulative probability of venous thromboembolism by the age of 50 is 0.5% and by 80 is 3.8%.Hansson et al; Archives of Internal Medicine, 1997.
Discussion
DVT following THR/TKR: 40-80%
Clinical PE: 4-10%
Fatal PE: 0.5-2%
Source: Geerts et al, Chest 2004
Discussion
Our findings suggest a 5% incidence of DVT
95% confident Overall incidence of DVT is <9% Incidence of above knee DVT is <5%
Discussion
Author Patients included Incidence of DVT
Kujath et al, 1993
n=127
Lower limb injuries 16.5%
Kock et al, 1996
n=163
Lower limb injuries 4.3%
Jorgensen et al, 2002
n=106
Lower limb injuries 20%
Lassen et al, 2002
n=187
Lower limb injuries; included post-op as well
19%
Prophylaxis in UK
Thromboprophylaxis for ankle # % of hospitals surveyed
All patients 8.6 (n=6)
Only if pt was admitted 17.2 (n=12)
Only for high risk patients 5.7 (n=4)
No prophylaxis 62.8 (n=44)
Batra et al; Injury, 2006
Conclusion
Incidence of DVT following ankle fractures is 5%
Routine thromboprophylaxis is not justified
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the entire staff of the Orthopaedic Department, JCUH, for their support
Special thanks to Alison Gamble, Chris Cummins (ultrasound technicians) and Dr. R Bellamy
This project was funded by the Orthopaedic Department, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough