Transcript

„Comparison of Fuel-Cell-Vehicles with Other Alternative Systems

Dr. Johannes Töpler, Deutscher Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellenverband (DWV)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

1920 1960 2000 2040 2080

Coal

Nat.Gas

Oil

Nuclear Energy

Wind

PV

SOT

Biomass

Mtoe [Millions of Tons of Oil Equivalent]

Quelle: LBST Alternative World Energy Outlook 2005

Jahr

A possible Scenario of World Energy

Solarthermal Electricity

Geothermal Heat

Geothermal Electricity

PV Electricity

Water Power

Wind Power

Solarthermal Heat

Future primary energy supply

Supply cannot satisfy demand

Supply outreaches demand by far

Vertical load curve and feed-in of wind power in E.ON grid

Vertical load

Wind power 2007

Estimated wind power 2020

Date

Fluctuating renewable electricity

HydrogenElectricity

or:

Hydrogen as secondary energy carrier

Comparison of netto-storage capacities

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Zeit in d

Win

d Le

istu

ng in

MW

AA CAES

Pumpspeicher

H2 (GuD)

Bei einem Speichervolumen von V = 8 Mio. m³

8 Mio. m3 correspond to the biggest German natural gas caverne fieldFor comparison: Pump storage Goldisthal has a Volume of 12 Mio. m3

Pump storage5 GWh

AA CAES23 GWh

H2 – Gas /vapor turbineca. 1.300 GWh (1.3 TWh)

Time (days)

Win

d Po

wer

in M

W

Storage volume of V = 8 Mio. m3

Source: KBB UT

Electric Drive

System Module

Fuel Cell Stack

Power Distribution Unit (PDU)

Hydrogen Storage

Cooling System

Daimler, FCell Packaging

Battery

Fuel Cell vehicleMercedes-Benz B-Class

Lithium-Ionbattery

Electric motor

Air module

Hydrogen tank

Hydrogen module

Fuel Cell

Hydrogen module

Essential Facts

1) Vehicle is constructed,fabricated and approvedunder serial condititions.

2) It was tested by a turn of 125 days around the world with 30.000km

3) Start of serial productionin 2017

B-Class F-Cell

Next generation of the fuel cell-power train:

• Higher stack lifetime (>2000h)

• Increased power• Higher reliability• Freeze start ability• Li-Ion Battery

Size- 40%

[l/10

0km

Consumption- 16%

[kW

]Power+30%

[km

]

Range+135%Technical Data

Vehicle Type Mercedes-Benz A-Class (Long)

Fuel Cell System PEM, 72 kW (97 hp)

Engine

Engine Output (Continuous / Peak):45 kW / 65 kW (87hp)Max. Torque: 210 Nm

Fuel Hydrogen (35 MPa / 5,000 psi)Range 105 miles (170 km / NEDC)

Top Speed 88 mph (140 km/h)

BatteryNiMh, Output (Continuous / Peak): 15 kW / 20 kW (27hp); Capacity: 6 Ah, 1.2 kWh

Technical DataVehicle Type Mercedes-Benz B-Class

Fuel Cell System PEM, 90 kW (122 hp)

Engine

IPT Engine Output (Continuous/ Peak) 70kW / 100kW (136hp)Max. Torque: 290 Nm

Fuel Compressed Hydrogen (70 MPa / 10,000 psi)

Range ca. 250 miles (400 km)Top Speed 106 mph (170 km/h)

BatteryLi-Ion, Output (Continuous/ Peak): 24 kW / 30 kW (40hp); Capacity 6.8 Ah, 1.4 kWh

A-Class F-Cell

Progress Fuel Cell TechnologyNext Generation FCVs

Concept of Honda

After 2015, with lowered vehicle production costs and further developed hydrogen infrastructure, Hyundai will begin manufacturing hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for

consumer retail sales.

The ix35 Fuel Cell Specifications

The Hyundai Strategy, published on Feb. 27th 2013

Hyundai plans to build 1,000 ix35 Fuel Cell vehicles by 2015 for lease to public and private fleets, primarily in Europe, where the European Union has established a

hydrogen road map and initiated construction of hydrogen fueling stations.

„Phileas-Bus“ in Colognein daily use in public trafic

Source: HyCologne -Wasserstoff Region Rheinland

Source: Vossloh

Anode: H2 2 H+ + 2 e-

Cathode: 2 H+ + ½O2 + 2 e- H2O---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sum: H2 + ½O2 H2O

CnH2(n+1) + (3n+1)/2 O2 nCO2 + (n+1)/2 H2O

Comparison of Power-Trains I

Gasoline/ Diesel- Vehicles

H2/FC- vehicles

Battery-Vehicles

(double range)I

Cathode: LixCn nC + x Li+ + x e-

Anode: Li1-xMn2O4+ xLi +xe- LiMn2O4------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------

Batt.: Li1-xMn2O4+ LixCn LiMn2O4 + nC

Electricity-Management

Powertrain of a H2/FC-hybrid-vehicle

Market segments for battery-and fuel cell vehicles

Original-Source: Coalition Study

Annual range

(1000 km)

< 10

> 20

10- 20

Compakt Class Medium Class Comfort-Classc l a s s o f v e h i c l e s

Fuel cell vehicles

hybridised

Battery-Vehicles

Plug-in-VehiclesFC- Vehicles

As personal mobility, EV is viable for inner-city travel, and FCHV for inter-city travel.

Cover Area of FCHV and EV EV: inner-city

FCHV: inter-city travelSmall

Middle

Large

Short-range Middle-range Long-range

CommuterTown use

Long-distance trucksExpressway buses

Middle & large passenger cars

City busCourier vehicles

EV

FCHV

PHV(Biofuel)

Concept of TOYOTA

Number of passenger vehicles (hybrid) which can be supplied per ha

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Biodie

sel (R

ME)Eth

anol

wheat

Ethan

ol sho

rt rota

tion f

orestr

yBio

-meth

ane

BTL

CGH2 s

hort r

otatio

n fore

stry

LH2 s

hort r

otatio

n fore

stry

CGH2 P

V

LH2 P

VCG

H2 wind

power

LH2 w

indpo

wer

[Pas

seng

er v

ehic

les/

ha] Diesel engine

Otto engineFuel cell

Bandwidth

Annual mileage passenger vehicle: 12,000 km

Reference vehicle: VW Golf

*) *)

*) more than 99% of the land area can still be used for other purposes e.g. agriculture

Source: LBST

Comparison of Fuel Cell System and Internal Combustion Engine

Power in %

Effic

ienc

y in

%Medium Power

Passenger Car Bus /Truck

with HydrogenFuel Cell Systems

Source: IBZ

50 ltr. E 105 ltr. Ethanol=̂

12,5 kg Wheat106 MJ (29,4 kWh)

80 MJ (22,2 kWh)

9,5 kg Wheat

22 kg WheatNecessary area of farmland: 39 m2

Consumption: 6l/100 km 2,5 kg Bread /100 km

E10-Balance

External EnergyNot CO2-free !

Alternative

Annual range :15 000km 375 kg Bread = 585 m2 Farmland^

J.Töpler

η(%)

100

70

54

30

12

Comparison hydrogen „ Wind-Gas“ for mobile application

Efficiencies:η (elektrolysis) = 70%

η (Sabatier) = 78%

η (NEDC, ICE) = 22%

η (NEDC, FC) = 42%

Electricity from

Wind&PVElektrolysis Methani-

sation(Sabatier)

Transport

Distribution

Fuel Cell

Combustion

J.Töpler

Eprim

8,3

4,5

2,4

1

Electricity from

Wind&PV

Elektrolysis Methani-sation

(Sabatier)

Transport

Distribution

Fuel Cell

Combustion

3,4

5,8

Efficiencies:η (elektrolysis) = 70%

η (Sabatier) = 78%

η (NEDC, ICE) = 22%

η (NEDC, FC) = 42%

Comparison hydrogen „ Wind-Gas“ for mobile application

“Optiresource” (Daimler AG)

See:

http://www2.daimler.com/sustainability/optiresource/index.html

Thank you very much for your attention!

And see us occasionally at

www.dwv-info.de!

Which are the questions I can answer at first?


Top Related