modulation of intracellular calcium changes and glutamate release by neuropeptide y1 and y2...
TRANSCRIPT
Journal of Neurochemistry, 2001, 79, 286±296
Modulation of intracellular calcium changes and glutamate release
by neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the rat hippocampus:
differential effects in CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus
Ana P. Silva,* ArseÂlio P. Carvalho,* Caetana M. Carvalho* and JoaÄo O. Malva*,²
*Center for Neuroscience of Coimbra, Department of Zoology and ²Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
In the present work, we investigated the role of pre- and
post-synaptic neuropeptide Y1 (NPY1) and Y2 receptors on
the calcium responses and on glutamate release in the rat
hippocampus. In cultured hippocampal neurones, we observed
that only NPY1 receptors are involved in the modulation of
intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca21]i). In 88% of the
neurones analysed, the increase in the [Ca21]i, in response
to depolarization with 50 mM KCl, was inhibited by 1 mM
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY, whereas 300 nM NPY13±36 was without
effect. However, studies with hippocampal synaptosomes
showed that both NPY1 and Y2 receptors can modulate the
[Ca21]i and glutamate release. The pharmacological charac-
terization of the NPY-induced inhibition of glutamate release
indicated that Y2 receptors play a predominant role, both in the
modulation of Ca21-dependent and -independent glutamate
release. However, we could distinguish between Y1 and Y2
receptors by using [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and NPY13±36. Active
pre-synaptic Y1 receptors are present in the dentate gyrus
(DG) as well as in the CA3 subregion, but its activity was not
revealed by using the endogenous agonist, NPY. Concerning
the Y2 receptors, they are present in the three subregions
(CA1, CA3 and DG) and were activated by either NPY13±36
or NPY. The present data support a predominant role for
NPY2 receptors in mediating NPY-induced inhibition of gluta-
mate release in the hippocampus, but the physiological
relevance of the presently described DG and CA3 pre-
synaptic NPY1 receptors remains to be clari®ed.
Keywords: glutamate release, hippocampus, intracellular
calcium, Y1 receptors, Y2 receptors.
J. Neurochem. (2001) 79, 286±296.
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is the most abundant peptide in the
mammalian central and peripheral nervous systems, exhibiting
potent effects on feeding, memory, blood pressure, cardiac
contractility and intestinal secretions (Balasubramaniam
1997). The use of various cloning techniques has resulted
in the identi®cation of ®ve receptors (Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5 and
Y6) (Wan and Benjamin 1995), and a more recent study
shows the existence of a putative Y3 receptor (Lee and
Miller 1998). The NPY receptors, especially Y1, Y2 and Y5,
are most abundant in the hippocampal formation (Aicher
et al. 1991; Dumont et al. 1993, 1998; Parker and Herzog
1999), where they modulate cognitive functions. NPY2
binding sites are particularly concentrated in the strata
radiatum and oriens of the CA1 sub®elds, and throughout
the pyramidal cell layer of the CA3 region (Parker and
Herzog 1999). In contrast, Y1 binding sites are mostly
localized in the granular layer of the dentate gyrus (DG;
Dumont et al. 1993, 1996; Larsen et al. 1993).
NPY receptors show very low primary amino acid
sequence identity, but surprisingly, they exhibit very similar
pharmacology. Indeed, it is possible to characterize the
receptors based on the rank order of potency of NPY and
related peptides (Michel et al. 1998) and of selective
antagonists (Lundberg et al. 1996). The Y1 subtype displays
high af®nity for the NPY analogue [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and
for the Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP3226 (Wieland et al.
286 q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
Received April 9, 2001; revised manuscript received July 26, 2001;
accepted July 27, 2001.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to J. O. Malva, Center
for Neuroscience of Coimbra, Department of Zoology, University of
Coimbra, 3004±517 Coimbra, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected]
Abbreviations used: 4-AP, 4-aminopyridine; BIBP3226, (R)-N 2-
(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-d-arginine amide; BSA,
bovine serum albumin; [Ca21]i, intracellular free calcium concentra-
tion; CA1, regio superior cornu ammonis; CA3, regio inferior cornu
ammonis; DG, dentate gyrus; NPY, neuropeptide Y.
1995; Doods et al. 1996). In contrast, the Y2 receptor
subtype exhibits high af®nity for C-terminal fragments of
NPY (Rose et al. 1995; Wieland et al. 1995), and also for
two different Y2 receptor antagonists, BIIE0246 (Doods
et al. 1999) and T4-[NPY(33±36)]4 (Grouzmann et al.
1997).
Although we do not know the precise role of each NPY
receptor subtype in the various physiological effects induced
by NPY, the Y1 receptor has been linked to different
biological actions, in the central nervous system, such as
NPY-induced stimulation of feeding behaviour (Wieland
et al. 1998) or the modulation of anxiety (Wahlestedt et al.
1993). The Y2 receptors are predominantly known for their
association with inhibitory effects on the release of gluta-
mate in the rat hippocampus, and for their effects on the
modulation of memory processes. Also, NPY is a powerful
stimulant for food intake by activating the hypothalamic
`feeding' receptor, the NPY5 receptor.
Since NPY inhibits excitatory neurotransmission and
regulates hyperexcitability (Baraban et al. 1997) in normal
hippocampus (Colmers et al. 1991), this peptide may play a
critical role during seizure activity (Woldbye et al. 1997).
However, the NPY receptor subtype(s) mediating endo-
genous anticonvulsant effects has not been clearly de®ned,
but it seems that Y1, Y2 and Y5 subtypes are likely to play
an important role in normal physiological conditions, as well
as in response to pathological hyperactivity in the hippo-
campus (Bijak 1999; Marsh et al. 1999). Indeed, the pre-
synaptic modulation of glutamate release by NPY receptors
may be especially relevant for antiepileptic properties of
NPY. Recently, a pre-synaptic Y2 receptor in CA1 sub-
region was described (Weiser et al. 2000). However, there is
a lack of pharmacological characterization of NPY1 and Y2
pre- and post-synaptic receptors in the hippocampal sub-
regions. The present paper aims to clarify the contribution of
both receptors in modulating the intracellular calcium
changes and glutamate release in the hippocampus. Pre-
liminary results of this work were previously published in
abstract form (Silva et al. 2000).
Materials and methods
Materials
Neuropeptide Y, neuropetide Y13±36 and [Leu31,Pro34]neuro-
petide Y were obtained from Bachem (Bubendorf, Switzerland).
(R)-N 2-(Diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]arginin amide
(BIBP3226) was purchased from Peninsula Laboratories (Belmont,
CA, USA), and T4-[neuropeptide Y(33±36)]4 was provided by Dr
Eric Grouzmann. Neurobasal medium, B27 supplement, gentamicin
and trypsin (USP grade) were purchased from Gibco-BRL, Life
Technologies (Paisley, UK). Glutamate, DNase (DN-25) and
l-glutamic acid dehydrogenase type II were obtained from Sigma
Chemical (St Louis, MO, USA). The acetoxymethyl ester of fura-2
(fura-2AM) and Pluronic F-127 were purchased from Molecular
Probes (Leiden, the Netherlands). All the other reagents were from
Sigma or from Merck-Schuchardt (Darmstadt, Germany). Fura-
2AM and Pluronic F-127 stock solutions were prepared in
dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Cell culture
Hippocampal neurones were dissociated from hippocampi of E18-
E19 Wistar rat embryos, after treatment with trypsin (2.0 mg/mL,
15 min, 378C) and deoxyribonuclease I (0.15 mg/mL) in Ca21 and
Mg21 free Hank's balanced salt solution (137 mm NaCl, 5.36 mm
KCl, 0.44 mm KH2PO4, 0.34 mm Na2HPO4.2H2O, 4.16 mm
NaHCO3, 5 mm glucose, 1 mm sodium pyruvate, 10 mm HEPES,
pH 7.4). The cells were cultured in serum-free neurobasal medium,
supplemented with B27 supplement, glutamate (25 mm), glutamine
(0.5 mm) and gentamicin (0.12 mg/mL), as described previously
(Brewer et al. 1993; AmbroÂsio et al. 2000). Cultures were kept at
378C in a humidi®ed incubator in 5% CO2/95% air, for 7±8 days, the
time required for maturation of hippocampal neurones. For calcium
imaging, cells were plated on poly-d-lysine-coated (0.1 mg/mL)
glass coverslips at a density of 45 � 103 cells/cm2.
Procedures involving animals and their care were carried out in
accordance with European Community laws and policies. All
efforts were made to minimize animal suffering, and to reduce the
number of animals used.
Preparation of synaptosomes
A partially puri®ed synaptosomal fraction (P2) was isolated from
hippocampi or from hippocampal subregions (CA1, CA3 and DG)
of male Wistar rats (2-month-old), essentially as described pre-
viously for brain cortex (McMahon et al. 1992), with some modi®-
cations (Malva et al. 1996). The hippocampi were homogenized in
0.32 m sucrose, 10 mm HEPES-Na, pH 7.4, and centrifuged at
3000 g for 2 min. The pellet obtained was resuspended, followed
by sedimentation at the same speed. The combined supernatants
were spun for 12 min at 14 600 g, and a P2 pellet was obtained.
The upper, whiter, layer of this pellet was resuspended in the
sucrose medium.
Coronal slices of the hippocampus (800 mm thick) were prepared
for the isolation of synaptosomes from hippocampal subregions
(CA1, CA3 and DG). In each slice, the ®mbria and the subiculum
were separated from the rest of each slice, under stereomicroscopic
observation. CA3 subslices were obtained by separation from CA1
and DG, and the last separation (CA1 from DG) was performed
through the hippocampal sulcus (Fig. 1). The pooled subslices were
homogenized in the sucrose medium indicated above, transferred to
Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged as described for the isolation of
whole hippocampal synaptosomes. The P2 pellet of each subregion
was resuspended in buffered sucrose medium (Malva et al. 1996).
For the [Ca21]i measurements or glutamate release, the synapto-
somes were stored as drained pellets, containing 0.75 mg or 1 mg
of protein each, respectively.
Percoll-puri®ed synaptosomes were also prepared (Dunkley et al.
1988), for comparison, and we obtained similar results in the
intracellular calcium changes and glutamate release protocols.
[Ca21]i measurements in synaptosomal preparations
Synaptosomes (3 mg/mL) were incubated with 5 mm fura-2AM
and 0.02% Pluronic F-127 in incubation medium (132 mm NaCl,
1 mm KCl, 1 mm MgCl2, 100 mm CaCl2, 1.2 mm H3PO4, 10 mm
glucose and 10 mm HEPES-Na, pH 7.4) with 0.1% fatty acid-free
bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 20 min at 258C. After this loading
Neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the hippocampus 287
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
period, synaptosomes were pelleted, the non-hydrolysed probe was
removed and further incubated in the same medium plus 1 mm
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY or 300 nm NPY13±36, for 10 min at 378C.
Synaptosomes were also preincubated with the agonists for 300 s
before stimulation with 1 mm 4-aminopyridine (4-AP). The
¯uorescence of fura-2-loaded synaptosomes was monitored at
378C, using a computer-assisted Spex Fluoromax spectro¯uoro-
meter, at 510 nm emission and double excitation at 340 nm and
380 nm, using 5 nm slits. The calibration was made in the presence
of 2.5 mm ionomycin (1 mm CaCl2; Rmax), at 500 s, and 4 mm
EGTA (Rmin), at 600 s. The ¯uorescence intensities were auto-
matically converted into [Ca21]i-values by using the calibration
equation for double excitation wavelength measurements and
taking the dissociation constant of the fura-2/Ca21 complex as
224 nm (Grynkiewicz et al. 1985).
Fura-2 ¯uorescence measurements by video imaging in
hippocampal neurones
Hippocampal neurones plated on coverslips at a density of
45 � 103 cells/cm2 were loaded by incubation with 5 mm fura-
2AM and 0.02% Pluronic F-127 for 45 min, at 378C, in Krebs
buffer supplemented with 0.1% BSA (w/v). After incubation, the
coverslips were washed and placed in a perfusion chamber on
the stage of an inverted Nikon Diaphot ¯uorescence microscope.
The cells were then perfused with Krebs buffer (378C) for about
5 min, before data acquisition. The experiments were conducted
under continuous superfusion with Krebs buffer containing the
drugs, as indicated in the ®gure legends. The neurones were
stimulated with 50 mm KCl, 15 s after starting image acquisition
and preincubated with [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (1 mm) or NPY13±36
(300 nm) for 10 min before stimulation. The ¯uorescence changes
were recorded with a multiple excitation Magical imaging system
(Applied Imaging, Sunderland, UK). Hippocampal neurones were
alternately excited at 340 nm and 380 nm using a switching ®lter
wheel, and the emitted ¯uorescence, collected with a 40� objective
(Nikon, Badhoeverdoer, the Netherlands), was driven to a
Photonics Science SIT camera, after passing through a 510-nm
bandpass ®lter. Image analysis was performed with the Magical
system and software developed by Dr Enrique Castro (Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Physiology, University
Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain). The ratio images were coded in
pseudocolour (dark blue to red for minimum to the maximum 340/
380 ratios), and the background ¯uorescence at each wavelength
was subtracted and ¯uorescence images were ratioed on a pixel-by-
pixel basis, being ratio data stored as a 8-bit pseudocoloured
images. Areas of the cell bodies were drawn and the averaged value
of pixel intensities was evaluated at each time point, in order to
obtain ratio versus time plots for all areas de®ned. The results were
expressed as the ratio of ¯uorescence intensity with excitation at
340 nm and 380 nm.
Measurement of glutamate release
The release of endogenous glutamate was followed using a con-
tinuous ¯uorimetric assay as previously described (Nicholls et al.
1987), with some modi®cations (Malva et al. 1996). Synaptosomes
(1 mg protein) were incubated for 20 min at 378C in the following
medium: 132 mm NaCl, 1 mm KCl, 1 mm MgCl2, 1.2 mm H3PO4,
0.1 mm CaCl2, 10 mm glucose, 10 mm HEPES-Na, pH 7.4, with
0.1% fatty acid-free BSA. After this period, the agonists or/and
antagonists were added to the medium for 10 min Then, synapto-
somes were centrifuged at 15 800 g, and resuspended in 1 mL of
the same medium, without BSA and with 1 mm CaCl2 or 200 nm
free Ca21. The suspension was transferred to a stirred cuvette at
378C, followed by the addition of 1 mm NADP, 50 units of puri®ed
glutamate dehydrogenase, and again the agonists/antagonists. The
total period of exposure to the drugs was 20 min. Fluorescence was
measured by using a Perkin-Elmer model LS-5B luminescence
spectrometer at the excitation and emission wavelengths of 340 nm
and 460 nm, respectively, with excitation and emission slits of
5 nm and 10 nm, respectively. The data were collected at 0.5-s
intervals and the quanti®cation of glutamate was performed at the
end of each experiment by adding 2.5 nmol of l-glutamate.
Statistical analysis
The data are expressed as means ^ SEM. Statistics were performed
using an analysis of variance (anova), followed by Dunnett's or
Bonferroni's post-tests, as indicated in the ®gure legends. In the
[Ca21]i measurements, the 95% con®dence intervals (CI) are also
indicated. The dose±inhibition curves for the effects of [Leu31,-
Pro34]NPY or NPY13±36 represent the best ®t according the non-
linear regression analysis (one-site competition), assuming top
value of 100%.
Fig. 1 Coronal section (800 mm) of the hippocampus obtained from
a 6-week-old male Wistar rat, and illustration of the procedure used
to visualize the subregions before isolation of the synaptosomal frac-
tion. For the illustration, the slice was ®xed in 4% paraformaldehyde,
followed by Timm staining. (a) Whole slice. (b) Separation of CA3
from the ®mbria plus CA1/DG subregions, and separation of DG
from CA1 through the hippocampal ®ssure. CA1, regio superior
cornu ammonis; CA3, regio inferior cornu ammonis; DG, dentate
gyrus.
288 A. P. Silva et al.
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
Results
Modulation of the [Ca21]i response by NPY1 and Y2
receptor activation
The in¯ux of calcium is a key signal for cell death, and a
prolonged increase in intracellular Ca21 concentration is
regarded as one major trigger of the neurodegenerative
processes. To better understand the possible modulatory role
of NPY1 and Y2 receptors in neuroprotection, we analysed the
[Ca21]i changes evoked by KCl depolarization in the presence
of selective agonists for these receptors in cultured hippo-
campal neurones, as well as in hippocampal synaptosomes.
In single cell studies, we observed that, in most cells
analysed, the [Ca21]i responses induced by 50 mm KCl were
inhibited by 1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (Figs 2a±d and 3a±c),
but not by 300 nm NPY13±36 (Figs 2e±h and 3d), two
agonists of either NPY1 or Y2 receptors, respectively. How-
ever, different populations of neurones responded differently
to NPY1 and Y2 receptors activation: the presence of 1 mm
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY signi®cantly reduced the KCl-stimulated
[Ca21]i changes in 89% of total neurones (144 neurones
analysed), and in a smaller percentage of neurones (11%)
this Y1 receptor agonist did not have any effect (Fig. 3a,
group A). Concerning the inhibitory effect induced by
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY, we obtained two groups of neurones:
group B (Fig. 3b), including neurones in which the KCl-
evoked response in the presence of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY was
between 10 and 50% of the control; and group C (Fig. 3c)
including neurones in which the response was between 50
and 90% of the control. Thus, in group B (24.3% of total
neurones), the response was inhibited to 32.2 ^ 1.9% (95%
CI between 12.0 and 48.9%), whereas in group C (64.6% of
total neurones), the response was inhibited to 67.4 ^ 1.0%
of the control (95% CI between 51.1 and 88.8%). In contrast,
incubation with the NPY2 receptor agonist, NPY13±36
(300 nm), did not signi®cantly modulate the [Ca21]i in
neuronal cell bodies, in all cells analysed (Fig. 3d).
In order to investigate pre-synaptic modulation of [Ca21]i
by NPY receptors we used rat hippocampal synaptosomes.
Fura-2 loaded synaptosomes were depolarized with KCl
(15 mm), resulting in a subsequent increase in [Ca21]i. In
the presence of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (1 mm) or NPY13±36
(300 nm), the increase in [Ca21]i due to KCl stimulation was
inhibited to 86.0 ^ 1.6% or 79.6 ^ 2.1% of the control,
respectively (Fig. 4). Similar inhibitory effects were
obtained when using 1 mm 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), instead
of 15 mm KCl as the depolarizing agent (data not shown).
Modulation of endogenous glutamate release by
activation of NPY1 and Y2 receptors in hippocampal
nerve terminals: effects on Ca21-dependent and
Ca21-independent release
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the
mammalian CNS and is known to be involved in some CNS
pathologies. Due to their putative antiepileptic and neuro-
protective properties, it is important to understand how NPY
receptors can regulate glutamate release. Therefore, we
investigated the effect of different concentrations of
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY or NPY13±36 on the release of
endogenous glutamate stimulated by KCl (15 mm).
The two agonists inhibited both the total (1 mm Ca21
present) and the Ca21-independent (200 nm free external
Ca21) glutamate release in a concentration-dependent
manner (Figs 5a and b). However, although the maximal
inhibition of Ca21-independent release of glutamate was
Fig. 2 Fluorescence microscopy images of single-cell Ca21 concen-
tration in monolayer cultures of hippocampal neurones. (a, c, e and
g) The ®gures represent the basal [Ca21]i; (b and f ) 15 s after stimu-
lation with 50 mM KCl; 15 s after stimulation with 50 mM KCl in the
presence of (d) 1 mM [Leu31,Pro34]NPY or (h) 300 nM NPY13±36.
The images were coded in pseudocolour (dark blue to red for the
minimum to the maximum 340 nm/380 nm ratios).
Neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the hippocampus 289
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
similar in both situations, at the same concentration of the
agonists (the bottom values were 60.7% or 70.7%, for
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY or NPY13±36, respectively), the NPY2
receptor activation induced a higher inhibition of the total
glutamate release, when compared with the activation of Y1
receptors (the bottom values were 67.5 or 49.5, for
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY or NPY13±36, respectively). In the
presence of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, the calculated IC50 values
to the glutamate release inhibition were 1092 nm (95% CI
between 424 and 2815) or 124 nm (95% CI between 68 and
224), with 200 nm or 1 mm Ca21 present in the medium,
respectively (Fig. 5a). Moreover, in the presence of NPY13±
36, the IC50s values were 81 nm (95% CI between 44 and
151) or 99 nm (95% CI between 62 and 159), when 200 nm
or 1 mm Ca21 was present in the medium, respectively
(Fig. 5b). Based on these ®ndings, we used selected con-
centrations of the two agonists (1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY,
100 or 300 nm NPY13±36) to further characterize the
effects of NPY1 and Y2 receptor activation on the Ca21-
dependent and -independent glutamate release, as shown in
Figs 6 and 7.
Stimulation of hippocampal synaptosomes with 15 mm KCl
(1 mm Ca21 present) evoked the release of 1.29 ^ 0.11%
nmol glutamate/mg protein/min. The Ca21-independent
glutamate release, presumably due to the reversal of glutamate
carrier, obtained in the presence of 200 nm free external
Ca21, was 0.39 ^ 0.03% nmol glutamate/mg protein/min,
which corresponds to 30% of the total glutamate release. In
the presence of 1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, 100 or 300 nm
NPY13±36 or 1 mm NPY, the total glutamate release
decreased to 71.6 ^ 1.8%, 71.3 ^ 2.0%, 60.1 ^ 2.9% or
48.2 ^ 2.2% of the control, respectively (Fig. 6a).
In order to show the selective involvement of the NPY
receptors on total glutamate release, we also used NPY1 and
Y2 receptor antagonists. The selective Y1 receptor antago-
nist, BIBP3226 (1 mm), completely prevented the inhibitory
effect induced by 1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (93.4 ^ 2.3%
Fig. 3 Representative recordings of single-
cell [Ca21]i responses to 50 mM KCl depo-
larization, in the absence or in the presence
of (a±c) [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (1 mM) or (d)
NPY13±36 (300 nM). Concerning the effect
of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, three groups of neu-
rones were identi®ed showing: (a) no inhibi-
tion, (b) strong or (c) moderate inhibition of
the [Ca21]i responses induced by 50 mM
KCl. The results were obtained from 144 or
50 cultured hippocampal neurones, respec-
tively (®ve or three independent cultures,
respectively). Hippocampal neurones were
stimulated 15 s after starting data acquisi-
tion and each recording lasted 75 s. The
second recording in each experiment was
carried out 15 min after the end of the ®rst
recording.
Fig. 4 Quantitative analysis of the inhibitory effect of [Leu31,
Pro34]NPY (1 mM) or NPY13±36 (300 nM) on the [Ca21]i changes sti-
mulated by 15 mM KCl in rat hippocampal synatosomes. The basal
[Ca21]i was 213.9 ^ 9.3 nM (n � 12). The results represent the
mean ^ SEM between four and eight independent experiments, in
different synaptosomal preparations. *p , 0.05 ± Dunnett's post hoc
test; statistical signi®cance when compared with the control (KCl
stimulation).
290 A. P. Silva et al.
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
of the control) (Fig. 6a). Concerning the Y2 receptor, the
antagonist, T4-[NPY(33±36)]4 (1 mm), completely pre-
vented the inhibitory effect induced by 100 nm NPY13±36
(95.6 ^ 5.6% of the control), but at a higher concentration
of the agonist (300 nm), the blockade by the Y2 antagonist
Fig. 5 Concentration±inhibition curve for the effect of (a) [Leu31,
Pro34]NPY or (b) NPY13±36 10±3000 nM on the total (D) and
Ca21-independent (B) release of endogenous glutamate evoked by
15 mM KCl, determined in the presence of 1 mM or 200 nM CaCl2,
respectively. The results represent the mean ^ SEM of between
three and 12 independent experiments, in different synaptosomal
preparations. *p , 0.05, **p , 0.01 ± Dunnett's post hoc test;
Statistical signi®cance when compared with the control (KCl
stimulation in the absence of the agonists).
Fig. 6 Quantitative analysis of the effect of NPY1 and Y2 receptors
agonists and antagonists on the (a) total (1 mM Ca21 present in the
external medium), (b) Ca21-independent 200 nM free Ca21 in the
external medium and (c) Ca21-dependent glutamate release (differ-
ence between total and Ca21-independent glutamate release)
evoked by 15 mM KCl depolarization in hippocampal synaptosomes.
The results represent the mean ^ SEM of between three and seven
independent experiments, in different synaptosomal preparations.
*p , 0.05, **p , 0.01 ± Dunnett's post-test; Statistical signi®cance
when compared with the control (KCl stimulation).
Neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the hippocampus 291
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
was not complete (71.4 ^ 2.7% of the control) (Fig. 6a).
The inhibitory effect of NPY (1 mm) (48.2 ^ 2.2% of the
control) could not be completely blocked by the Y2 receptor
antagonist (73.8 ^ 3.7% of the control), nor was it altered
by the Y1 receptor antagonist (52.3 ^ 3.7% of the control)
(Fig. 6a). Also, in the presence of both antagonists, the
effect was similar to that obtained in the presence of
T4-[NPY(33±36)]4 only (76.3 ^ 1.6% of the control)
(Fig. 6a).
We also investigated the effect of the activation of Y1 and
Y2 receptors on the Ca21-independent glutamate release
evoked by 15 mm KCl, determined in the presence of
200 nm CaCl2. In the presence of 1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY,
100 or 300 nm NPY13±36, the Ca21-independent glutamate
release decreased to 78.3 ^ 1.3%, 81.3 ^ 1.3% or 76.3 ^
1.0% (Fig. 6b) of the control, respectively. The inhibition of
Ca21-independent glutamate release induced by NPY
(1 mm) was similar to that obtained with [Leu31,Pro34]NPY
or NPY13±36 (79.2 ^ 3.5% of the control) (Fig. 6b).
Moreover, the veratridine-evoked Ca21-independent gluta-
mate release was inhibited in a very similar way by the
agonists (not shown).
The selective Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 (1 mm),
completely prevented the inhibitory effect due to 1 mm
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY (101.0 ^ 2.9% of the control) (Fig. 6b),
and the Y2 receptor antagonist, T4-[NPY(33±36)]4 (1 mm),
completely prevented the inhibitory effect due to 100 or
300 nm NPY13±36 (101.8 ^ 2.1% or 96.5 ^ 2.1% of the
control, respectively) (Fig. 6b). Also, it is interesting to
observe that the inhibitory effect of NPY on the Ca21-
independent glutamate release was mostly mediated by
NPY2 receptor activation, since the antagonist of Y2
receptors, T4-[NPY(33±36)]4, completely blocked the
inhibitory effect (100.0 ^ 2.1% of the control), which was
not the case in the presence of BIBP3226 (76.0 ^ 3.0% of
the control) (Fig. 6b). Similar results were obtained for the
effects of the antagonists on the total glutamate release
(Fig. 6a).
Based on the data presented in Fig. 6(a and b), it was
possible to calculate the effect of NPY1 and Y2 receptors
activation on the Ca21-dependent glutamate release (differ-
ence between total and Ca21-independent glutamate
release). In the presence of 1 mm [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, 100
or 300 nm NPY13±36 or 1 mm NPY, the Ca21-dependent
glutamate release decreased to 70.0 ^ 2.5%, 67.4 ^ 1.1%,
56.4 ^ 2.3% or 39.4 ^ 3.6% of the control, respectively
(Fig. 6c).
Modulation of glutamate release by activation of NPY1
and Y2 receptors in the hippocampal subregions: CA1,
CA3 and DG
Previous work indicates that the density of NPY1 and Y2
receptors varies among hippocampal subregions (Dumont
et al. 1993), and that the pre-synaptic effects of NPY in the
CA1 subregion are mediated by Y2 receptors (Weiser et al.
2000). To better characterize the nature of pre-synaptic NPY
receptors in different hippocampal subregions, we compared
the modulatory effect of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and NPY13±36
on the glutamate release obtained in the whole hippocampal
synaptosomes, or in synaptosomes isolated from hippo-
campal CA1, CA3 or DG subregions. When synaptosomes
isolated from the whole hippocampus, from CA3 or
from DG subregions (Fig. 1), were stimulated with 15 mm
KCl, the total release of glutamate was inhibited by
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY (1 mm) to 71.6 ^ 1.8%, 51.3 ^ 3.6, or
60.0 ^ 4.3% of the control, respectively (Fig. 7a). How-
ever, in synaptosomes from the CA1 subregion, the NPY1
receptor agonist did not show any inhibitory effect
(103.2 ^ 3.4% of the control), and the inhibition obtained
in CA3 subregion was signi®cantly greater than that obtained
in the whole hippocampus (�p , 0.05). Moreover, the total
release of glutamate was also inhibited by NPY13±36
(300 nm) to 60.1 ^ 2.1%, 74.3 ^ 2.6%, 53.8 ^ 2.2%, or
63.0 ^ 3.9% of the control, in synaptosomes from the
whole hippocampus or from the CA1, CA3 or DG sub-
regions, respectively (Fig. 7a).
The Ca21-independent glutamate release was slightly
inhibited by the two agonists in the CA3 and DG subregions,
but in the CA1 subregion only the activation of the Y2
receptors induced an inhibition of glutamate release:
80.1 ^ 1.7% or 82.7 ^ 5.5% of the control, respectively,
for [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, and 81.0 ^ 1.1%, 77.3 ^ 1.1% or
78.0 ^ 2.3 of the control, in CA1, CA3 or DG, respectively,
for NPY13±36 (Fig. 7b). Therefore, the Ca21-dependent
glutamate release was greatly inhibited by the NPY1 and
Y2 receptor agonists, especially in the CA3 subregion
(46.3 ^ 6.8% or 41.7 ^ 10.8% of the control, respectively)
(Fig. 7c), but also with a very signi®cant effect in the DG
subregion (59.0 ^ 6.7% or 67.3 ^ 1.5% of the control,
respectively). However, the activation of NPY2 receptors in
the CA1 subregion also induced a strong inhibition of the
Ca21-dependent glutamate release (46.8 ^ 5.3% of the
control). Thus, it is likely that the inhibition of glutamate
release observed in the whole hippocampus nerve terminals
is mainly due to the activation of both receptors localized in
the CA3 and DG subregions, and also to the activation of Y2
receptors in the CA1 subregion.
Discussion
The major ®nding of the present study is the identi®cation
of Y2 receptors responsible for the NPY-induced inhibition
of glutamate release in the hippocampus. Moreover, the
use of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY and BIBP3226 could also reveal
the involvement of pre-synaptic Y1 receptors able to modu-
late glutamate release in dentate gyrus and CA3 subregions.
Concerning the CA1 subregion, only Y2 receptors are
involved in the modulation of glutamate release since it is
292 A. P. Silva et al.
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
inhibited in the presence of NPY13±36 but is insensitive to
the Y1 receptor activation. We could also show that cultured
hippocampal neurones express post-synaptic Y1 receptors
involved in the inhibition of KCl-evoked increase in the
[Ca21]i.
The present work provides the ®rst cell-to-cell character-
ization of the role of NPY1 and Y2 receptors on the [Ca21]i
changes in the cultured rat hippocampal neurones. The
pharmacological identi®cation of Y1 receptors in single-cell
Ca21 imaging studies is evident since the presence of
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY signi®cantly reduced the KCl-induced
[Ca21]i changes in a high percentage of neurones. Also, we
found that there is a cell-to-cell variability, in that the
neurones did not respond equally to the NPY1 receptor
agonist, probably indicating that there is an heterogeneous
distribution of these receptors in the hippocampal neurone
cell bodies and/or the receptors may have different af®nities
for the agonist. However, the NPY2 receptor activation
did not modulate the [Ca21]i in neuronal cell bodies, in
contrast to the ®nding on synaptosomes. In this case, both
[Leu31,Pro34]NPY and NPY13±36 inhibited the changes in
intracellular Ca21 stimulated by KCl depolarization to a
similar extent.
It was reported previously that cultured hippocampal
neurones preferential express NPY1 over the Y2 receptor
subtype (St-Pierre et al. 1998), and also that Y1 receptors
exist on NPYergic hippocampal neurones (St-Pierre et al.
2000). Since hippocampal neurones in culture coexpress
active Y1 and Y2 receptors subtype, our results suggest that
in the hippocampus NPY2 receptors act mainly at pre-
synaptic nerve terminals, while Y1 receptors act both at pre-
and post-synaptic membranes, and that both receptors can
modulate the Ca21 in¯ux. This is also in agreement with
other studies where NPY was demonstrated to inhibit N-type
Ca21 channels through Y2 receptor activation (McCullough
et al. 1998), in NGF-differentiated PC12 cells, as well as
through Y1 receptors in rat dentate granule cells (McQuiston
and Colmers 1996).
It has been postulated that pre-synaptic inhibition of
transmitter release by neuropeptide Y is due to a reduction
in Ca21 in¯ux at the nerve terminal (Toth et al. 1993). In
the present work, we have clearly demonstrated that the
pre-synaptic inhibition of intracellular Ca21 changes upon
selective activation of either NPY1 or Y2 receptors, is
coupled to the inhibition of endogenous glutamate release.
This is in agreement with the suggestion that NPY can act as
an endogenous neuromodulator of the glutamatergic neuro-
transmission, and also with the observation that NPY limits
hyperexcitability in the epileptic human DG (Patrylo et al.
Fig. 7 Quantitative analysis of the effect of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY
(1 mM) or NPY13±36 (300 nM) on the (a) total, (b) Ca21-independent
and (c) Ca21-dependent glutamate release evoked by 15 mM KCl in
synaptosomes obtained from the whole hippocampus and from the
subregions, CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG). The results repre-
sent the mean ^ SEM of between three and 12 independent experi-
ments, in different synaptosomal preparations. *p , 0.05; **p , 0.01
± Dunnett's post hoc test; statistical signi®cance when compared
with the control (KCl stimulation). �p , 0.05 ± Bonferroni's post-
test; Statistical signi®cance when compared with the whole hippo-
campus.
Neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the hippocampus 293
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
1999). NPY was also shown to inhibit glutamate release
through Y2 receptors in rat hippocampal slices in vitro
(Greber et al. 1994), and the involvement of Y1 receptors in
the pre-synaptic modulation of glutamate release in the
striatum was also reported (Ellis and Davies 1994).
In the present study we attempted to discriminate between
the effects of activating NPY1 or Y2 receptors on the two
components of endogenous glutamate release: the Ca21-
dependent and -independent components which may be
elicited simultaneously due to depolarization of the nerve
terminals (Nicholls et al. 1987). A new ®nding of the present
work is that both Y1 and Y2 receptors modulate (inhibit) not
only the Ca21-dependent exocitosis of glutamate, but
also the Ca21-independent non-vesicular pathway. Con-
cerning the inhibition of the Ca21-independent glutamate
release, the modulatory effects of both receptors may be
exerted through the ion channels involved in depolarization,
and/or the direct inhibition of glutamate carrier. It is known
that under certain conditions, the uptake carriers working in
reverse order can pump transmitter out of the cell, and serve
as a calcium-independent, non-vesicular mechanism for
transmitter release (Attwell et al. 1993; Nicholls 1993).
Another possible mechanism by which NPY can produce
pre-synaptic inhibition was shown in the arcuate nucleus,
involving Y1 receptor-mediated activation of K1 currents
(Rhim et al. 1997). Also, the activation of the Y2 receptor
can lead, through a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, to
the opening of inwardly rectifying potassium channels in
the Xenopus oocytes (Rimland et al. 1996). Other studies
showing the effects of NPY on pre-synaptic inhibition
induced by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), suggest that NPY
causes pre-synaptic inhibition by increasing K1 conduc-
tance at the pre-synaptic terminal in rat hippocampal slices
in vitro (Klapstein and Colmers 1992). In hippocampal
neurones, the resulting increase of pre-synaptic K1 currents
by the activation of Y1 or Y2 receptors may inhibit the KCl-
evoked glutamate release.
We also determined that the total glutamate release
inhibition by NPY is mediated by NPY2 receptor activation,
and not by Y1 receptors. However, the NPY2 receptor
antagonist did not completely prevent this effect. This
®nding may suggest that receptors other than Y2 receptors,
for instance NPY5 receptors, may be involved in the
modulation of glutamate release by NPY. Indeed, Y5
receptors are expressed in high levels in the hippocampus
(Dumont et al. 1998), and mediate pre-synaptic inhibition of
stratum radiatum-evoked glutamatergic responses in some
pyramidal neurones of area CA3 and the proximal subicu-
lum (Ho et al. 2000). However, since T4-[NPY(33±36)]4 is a
competitive antagonist, it is also possible that this con-
centration (1 mm) may not be suf®ciently high to block fully
putative pre-synaptic Y2 receptors activated with 300 nm
NPY13±36. In fact, a recent study showed that the activa-
tion of Y2 receptors could inhibit basal and stimulated NPY
release, but this effect could only be partially prevented by
this Y2 antagonist (King et al. 1999). A more selective Y2
receptor antagonist, BIIE0246, with af®nity approximately
100-fold higher than T4-[NPY(33±36)]4, has recently been
synthesized (Doods et al. 1999), and can be useful in
clarifying these effects in our model.
We have shown that the activation of NPY1 and Y2
receptors inhibited glutamate release in the whole hippo-
campus, as well as in hippocampal subregions. These results
are in the line of previous work showing that NPY can
inhibit epileptiform activity in the rat hippocampus in vitro,
which can be due to inhibition of glutamate-mediated
synaptic transmission in areas CA1 and CA3 (Klapstein and
Colmers 1997), or in epileptic humans DG (Patrylo et al.
1999). The activation of post-synaptic Y1 receptors has a
depolarizing action on granule neurones when applied to
their dendritic projection in the stratum moleculare (Brooks
et al. 1987). Moreover, NPY acting on NPY2 receptors
inhibits excitatory (glutamatergic) synaptic transmission
(Colmers et al. 1991) onto CA3 pyramidal cells (McQuiston
and Colmers 1996). Recently a pre-synaptic Y2 receptor
was also identi®ed as the NPY receptor responsible for the
NPY-mediated inhibition of glutamate release in the CA1
subregion (Weiser et al. 2000).
In the present study, by using nerve terminals isolated
from the hippocampal subregions, CA1, CA3 and DG, we
show that the inhibition of Ca21-dependent and -indepen-
dent glutamate release is mainly due to the activation of Y1
receptors present in the CA3 and DG subregions, and to the
activation of Y2 receptors present in CA1, CA3 and DG
hippocampal subregions. However, in spite of the lower
expression of these receptors in the DG when compared
with the other two subregions (Parker and Herzog 1999),
we observed a clear inhibitory effect in this hippocampus
subregion. Accordingly, previous studies also showed that
NPY inhibits glutamate release (glutamatergic excitation) in
the rat DG (Whittaker et al. 1999), or even in epileptic
human DG (Patrylo et al. 1999). Moreover, the lack of effect
of [Leu31,Pro34]NPY in the CA1 subregion does not impli-
cate the absence of Y1 receptors, but only that when
selectively activated they do not modulate the glutamate
release in this hippocampal subregion. Thus, it is important
to keep in mind that the distribution of mRNA for NPY
receptors is not always indicative of the distribution of the
expressed proteins at synaptic levels. Indeed, for instance,
there is a lack of correlation between Y5 mRNA levels and
binding sites in the human hypothalamus (Statnick et al.
1998).
In conclusion, the data reported in the present paper show
that the activation of pre-synaptic NPY1 and Y2 receptor
can inhibit [Ca21]i changes and glutamate release in hippo-
campal nerve terminals. However, only NPY1 receptors
clearly modulate intracellular Ca21 changes in hippocampal
neurones. The NPY-mediated inhibition of glutamate
294 A. P. Silva et al.
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
release in the hippocampus is due to the activation of Y2
receptors, but active pre-synaptic Y1 receptors were
revealed in the CA3 and DG subregions.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr GracËa Baltazar and to Dr Paulo Pinheiro
for helping us in ratio images analysis and in slice preparation,
respectively. We would also like to thank to Ms Elisabete
Carvalho for assisting us in hippocampal cell cultures. This
work was supported by Foundation for Science and Tech-
nology, PRAXIS XXI Program, Portugal (Project PRAXIS
XXI/35875/99 and Grant PRAXIS 18261/98).
References
Aicher S. A., Springston M., Berger S. B., Reis D. J. and Wahlestedt
C. (1991) Receptor-selective analogs demonstrate NPY/PYY
receptor heterogeneity in rat brain. Neurosci. Lett. 130, 32±36.
AmbroÂsio A. F., Silva A. P., Malva J. O., Mesquita J. F., Carvalho A. P.
and Carvalho C. M. (2000) Role of desensitization of AMPA
receptors on the neuronal viability and on the [Ca21]i changes
in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12,
2021±2031.
Attwell D., Barbour B. and Szatkowski M. (1993) Non-vesicular release
of neurotransmitters. Neuron 11, 401±407.
Balasubramaniam A. (1997) Neuropeptide Y family of hormones:
Receptor Subtypes and antagonists. Peptides 18, 445±457.
Baraban S. C., Hollopeter G., Erickson J. C., Schwartzkroin P. A. and
Palmiter R. D. (1997) Knock-out mice reveal a critical anti-
epileptic role for neuropeptide Y. J. Neurosci. 17, 8927±8936.
Bijak M. (1999) Neuropeptide Y suppresses epileptiform activity in rat
frontal cortex and hippocampus in vitro via different NPY
receptor subtypes. Neurosci. Lett. 268, 115±118.
Brewer G. J., Torricelli J. R., Evege E. K. and Price P. J. (1993)
Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27-supplemented
neurobasalTM, a new serum-free medium combination. J. Neuro-
sci. Res. 35, 567±576.
Brooks P. A., Kelly J. S., Allen J. M., Smith D. A. S. and Stone T. W.
(1987) Direct excitatory effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in rat
hippocampal neurones in vitro. Brain Res. 408, 295±298.
Colmers W. F., Klapstein G. J., Fournier A., St-Pierre S. and Treherne
K. A. (1991) Pre-synaptic inhibition by neuropeptide Y in rat
hippocampal slice in vitro is mediated by a Y2 receptor. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 102, 41±44.
Doods H. N., Wieland H. A., Engel W., Eberlein W., Willim K.,
Entzeroth M., Wienen W. and Rudolf K. (1996) BIBP 3226, the
®rst selective neuropeptide Y1 receptor antagonist: a review of its
pharmacological properties. Regul. Peptides 65, 71±77.
Doods H., Gaida W., Wieland H. A., Dollinger H., Schnorrenberg G.,
Esser F., Engel W., Eberlein W. and Rudolf K. (1999) BIIB0246:
a selective and high af®nity neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor
antagonist. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 384, R3±R5.
Dumont Y., Fournier A., St-Pierre S. and Quirion R. (1993) Compara-
tive characterization and autoradiographic distribution of neuro-
peptide Y receptor subtypes in the rat brain. J. Neurosci. 13,
73±86.
Dumont Y., St-Pierre J. A. and Quirion R. (1996) Comparative
autoradiographic distribution of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors
visualized with the Y1 receptor agonist [125I][Leu31, Pro34]PYY
and the non-peptide antagonist [3H]BIBP3226. Neuroreport 7,
901±904.
Dumont Y., Fournier A. and Quirion R. (1998) Expression and
characterization of the neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor subtype in the
rat brain. J. Neurosci. 18, 5565±5574.
Dunkley P. R., Heath J. W., Harrison S. M., Jarvie P. E., Glen®eld P. J.
and Rostas J. A. (1988) A rapid Percoll gradient procedure for
isolation of synaptosomes directly from an S1 fraction: homo-
geneity and morphology of subcellular fractions. Brain Res. 441,
59±71.
Ellis Y. and Davies J. A. (1994) The effect of neuropeptides on the
release of neurotransmitter amino acids from rat striatum.
Neuropeptides 26, 65±69.
Greber S., Schwarzer C. and Sperk G. (1994) Neuropeptide Y inhibits
potassium-stimulated glutamate release through Y2 receptors in
rat hippomcampal slices in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 737±740.
Grouzmann E., Buclin T., Martire M., Cannizzaro C., DoÈrner B.,
Razaname A. and Mutter M. (1997) Characterization of a selec-
tive antagonist of neuropeptide Y at the Y2 receptor. J. Biol.
Chem. 272, 7699±7706.
Grynkiewicz M. E., Poenie M. and Tsien R. Y. (1985) A new generation
of Ca21 indicators with greatly improved ¯uorescent properties.
J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440±3450.
Ho M. W. Y., Beck-Sickinger A. G. and Colmers W. F. (2000) Neuro-
peptide Y5 receptors reduce synaptic excitation in proximal
subiculum, but not epileptiform activity in rat hippocampal slices.
J. Neurophysiol. 83, 723±734.
King P. J., Widdowson P. S., Doods H. N. and Williams G. (1999)
Regulation of neuropeptide Y release by neuropeptide Y receptor
ligands and calcium channel antagonists in hypothalamic slices.
J. Neurochem. 73, 641±645.
Klapstein G. J. and Colmers W. F. (1992) 4-Aminopyridine and low
Ca21 differentiate pre-synaptic inhibition mediated by neuro-
peptide Y, baclofen and 2-chloroadenosine in rat hippocampal
CA1 in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol. 105, 470±474.
Klapstein G. J. and Colmers W. F. (1997) Neuropeptide Y suppresses
epileptiform activity in rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Neurophysiol.
78, 1651±1661.
Larsen P. J., Sheikh S. P., Jakobsen C. R., Scwartz T. W. and Mikkelsen
J. D. (1993) Regional distribution of putative NPY Y1 receptors
and neurons expressing Y1 mRNA in forebrain areas of the rat
central nervous system. Eur. J. Neurosci. 5, 1622±1637.
Lee C. C. and Miller R. J. (1998) Is there really an NPY Y3 receptor?
Regul. Peptides 75±76, 71±78.
Lundberg J. M., Modin A. and MalmstroÈm R. E. (1996) Recent
developments with neuropeptide Y receptor antagonists. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 17, 301±304.
McCullough L. A., Egan T. M. and Westfall T. C. (1998) Neuropeptide
Y receptors involved in calcium channel regulation in PC12 cells.
Regul. Peptides 75±76, 101±107.
McMahon T. H., Foran P., Dolly J. O., Verhage M., Wiegant V. M. and
Nicholls D. G. (1992) Tetanus toxin and botulinum toxins type A
and B inhibit glutamate, g-aminobutyric acid, aspartate, and
met-enkephalin release from synaptosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 267,
21338±21343.
McQuiston A. R. and Colmers W. F. (1996) Neuropeptide Y2 receptors
inhibit the frequency of spontaneous but not miniature EPSCs in
CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus. J. Neurophysiol. 76,
3159±3168.
Malva J. O., Carvalho A. P. and Carvalho C. M. (1996) Domoic acid
induces the release of glutamate in the rat hippocampal CA3 sub-
region. Neuroreport 7, 1330±1344.
Marsh D. J., Baraban S. C., Hollopeter G. and Palmiter R. D. (1999)
Role of the Y5 neuropeptide Y receptor in limbic seizures. Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13518±13523.
Michel M. C., Beck-Sickinger A., Cox H., Doods H. N., Herzog H.,
Neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in the hippocampus 295
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296
Larhammar D., Quirion R., Schwartz T. and Westfall T. (1998)
XVI. International union of pharmacology recommendations for
the nomenclature of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, and pancreatic
polypeptide receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 50, 143±150.
Nicholls D. G. (1993) The glutamatergic nerve terminal. Eur. J.
Biochem. 212, 613±631.
Nicholls D. G., Sihra T. S. and Sanchez-Prieto J. (1987) Calcium-
dependent and independent release of glutamate from synapto-
somes monitored by continuous ¯uorometry. J. Neurochem. 49,
50±57.
Parker R. M. C. and Herzog H. (1999) Regional distribution of
Y-receptor subtype mRNA in rat brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11,
1431±1448.
Patrylo P. R., Van Den Pol A. N., Spencer D. D. and Williamson A.
(1999) NPY inhibits glutamatergic excitation in the epileptic
human dentate gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 82, 478±483.
Rhim H., Kinney G. A., Emmerson P. J. and Miller R. J. (1997)
Regulation of neurotransmission in the arcuate nucleus of the
rat by different neuropeptide Y receptors. J. Neurosci. 17,
2980±2989.
Rimland J. M., Seward E. P., Humbert Y., Ratti E., Trist D. G. and
North R. A. (1996) Coexpression with potassium channel subunits
used to clone the Y2 receptor for neuropeptide Y. Mol. Pharmacol.
49, 387±390.
Rose P. M., Fernandes P., Lynch J. S., Frazier S. T., Fisher S. M.,
Kodukula K., Kienzle B. and Seethala R. (1995) Cloning and
functional expression of a cDNA encoding a human type 2
neuropeptide Y receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22661±22664.
Silva A. P., Malva J. O., Carvalho A. P. and Carvalho C. M. (2000)
Modulation of glutamate release and calcium in¯ux by NPY Y1
and Y2 receptors in the rat hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12,
46p.
Statnick M. A., Douglas A. S., Gackenheimer S., Johnson D., Beavers
L., Mayne N. G., Burnett J. P., Gadski R. and Gehlert D. R. (1998)
Characterization of the neuropeptide Y5 receptor in the human
hypothalamus: a lack of correlation between Y5 mRNA levels and
binding sites. Brain Res. 810, 16±26.
St-Pierre J., Dumont Y., Nouel D., Herzog H., Hamel E. and Quirion R.
(1998) Preferential expression of the neuropeptide Y1 over the Y2
receptor subtype in cultured hippocampal neurones and cloning of
the rat Y2 receptor. Br. J. Pharmacol. 123, 183±194.
St-Pierre J., Nouel D., Dumont Y., Beaudet A. and Quirion R. (2000)
Association of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors with glutamate-
positive and NPY-positive neurons in rat hippocampal cultures.
Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 1319±1330.
Toth P. T., Bindokas V. P., Bleakman D., Colmers W. F. and Miller R. J.
(1993) Mechanism of pre-synaptic inhibition by neuropeptide Y at
sympathetic nerve terminals. Nature 364, 635±639.
Wahlestedt C., Pich E. M., Koob G. F., Yee F. and Heilig M. (1993)
Modulation of anxiety and neuropeptide Y-Y1 receptors by
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Science 259, 528±531.
Wan C. P. and Benjamin H. S. (1995) Neuropeptide Y receptor
subtypes. Lif. Sci. 56, 1055±1064.
Weiser T., Wieland H. A. and Doods H. N. (2000) Effects of the
neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor antagonist BIIE0246 on pre-synaptic
inhibition by neuropeptide Y in rat hippocampal slices. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 404, 133±136.
Whittaker E., Vereker E. and Lynch M. A. (1999) Neuropeptide Y
inhibits glutamate release and long-term potentiation in rat dentate
gyrus. Brain Res. 827, 229±233.
Wieland H. A., Willim K. D., Entzeroth M., Wienen W., Rudolf K.,
Eberlein W., Engel W. and Doods H. N. (1995) Subtype
selectivity and antagonistic pro®le of the non-peptide Y1 receptor
antagonist BIBP 3226. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 275, 143±149.
Wieland H. A., Engel W., Eberlein W., Rudolf K. and Doods H. N.
(1998) Subtype selectivity of the novel non-peptide neuropeptide
Y Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO 3304 and its effect on feeding in
rodents. Br. J. Pharmacol. 125, 549±555.
Woldbye D. P. D., Larsen P. J., Mikkelsen J. D., Klemp K., Madsen
T. M. and Bolwig T. G. (1997) Powerful inhibition of kainic acid
seizures by neuropeptide Y via Y5-like receptors. Nature Med. 3,
761±764.
296 A. P. Silva et al.
q 2001 International Society for Neurochemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry, 79, 286±296