loneliness and emergency and planned hospitalizations in a community sample of older adults
TRANSCRIPT
For Review O
nly
Loneliness and emergency and planned hospitalizations among a community sample of older adults.
Journal: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Manuscript ID: JAGS-1320-BR-Dec-09.R1
Manuscript Type: Brief Reports
Date Submitted by the Author:
15-Feb-2010
Complete List of Authors: Molloy, Gerard; University of Stirling, Department of Psychology McGee, Hannah; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Psychology O'Neill, Desmond; Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Medical Gerontology Conroy, Ronan; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Epidemiology
Key Words: loneliness, social support, health care use
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Loneliness and emergency and planned hospitalizations among a community sample of
older adults.
*Molloy GJ, PhD
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling Scotland.
McGee HM, PhD
Division of Population Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
O‟Neill D, MD
Department of Medical Gerontology, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath
Hospital, Dublin, Ireland & Centre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity
College Dublin, Dublin Ireland.
Conroy RM, DSc
Division of Population Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
*Corresponding author: Department of Psychology, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling,
Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; 2School of Psychology, University Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB,
UK. Tel: + 44 (0) 1786 467655. Fax: +44 (0) 1786 467641. Email:[email protected]
Alternative: Professor Hannah McGee, Department of Psychology, Division of Population
Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2,
Ireland. Tel +353-1-4022418/28, Fax +353-1-4022764 Email: [email protected]
Page 1 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Background: Loneliness is as an important prognostic risk factor for poor health among older
adults. There is some conflicting evidence showing that loneliness is associated with greater
health care use.
Objective: To examine whether loneliness is independently associated with both emergency
hospitalization and planned hospital inpatient admissions in a population sample of older adults.
Design: Nationally representative cross-sectional interviews in the Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland.
Setting: Private homes in the community.
Participants: Randomly selected older people in the community (aged > 65 years, N=2,033).
Main outcome measure: Emergency hospitalization and planned hospital admissions.
Results: Eleven percent of the sample had an emergency hospitalization and 15% had a planned
hospital admission. Forty-two percent reported being bothered by loneliness. A higher frequency
of loneliness was associated with emergency hospitalization only (Odds ratio = 1.29, 95% CI
1.08-1.55) and this association was independent of a range of potential confounds in multivariate
analysis.
Conclusion: In this community based sample of older adults greater loneliness was
independently associated with emergency hospitalization, but not planned inpatient admissions.
Key words: Loneliness, social isolation, health care use, emergency.
Page 2 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Introduction
The need to belong hypothesis states that it is a fundamental human motivation to form
and maintain strong stable interpersonal relationships 1. There is a compelling body of evidence
showing that an absence of such social relationships i.e. social isolation, is associated with
subsequent morbidity and mortality with effect sizes that rival conventional risk factors such as
obesity and physical inactivity 2. The data showing that objective indicators of social isolation,
such as unmarried status, are associated with poorer health both etiologically and prognostically
are now in little doubt 3; however perhaps more intriguingly is the increasingly large body of
work showing that the subjective experience of social isolation or „loneliness‟ is also related to
poorer subsequent health outcomes, independently of objective indicators of social isolation 4-6
.
Loneliness has been defined as an unpleasant subjective state of sensing a discrepancy
between the desired amount of companionship or emotional support and that which is available
in the person's environment 7. Loneliness is correlated with biological, psychological and social
antecedents 8,9
and there has been accumulating evidence indicating that loneliness may be an
important independent prognostic risk factor for physical illness most notably cognitive decline
10,11 and poorer psychological well being
12,13. There is also evidence showing that higher levels
of loneliness are associated with stress related pathophysiological processes that precede the
development of disease such as neuroendocrine, cardiovascular and immunological responses 14
.
These findings suggest that the loneliness to health link is indeed biologically plausible.
Loneliness may also be particularly important in understanding older adult‟s self-
management of health in the community, as it is argued that persistent feelings of loneliness can
lead to behavioural, emotional and cognitive dysregulation 9. One important set of outcomes to
understand in this context is the health care use of older adults. There are a limited number of
Page 3 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
studies that have examined links between loneliness and health care use. In a prospective study
of 232 heavy users of the emergency department (ED), continued use of the ED at follow-up was
associated with greater perceived loneliness at baseline 15
. In a cross-sectional study of 164 ED
users, loneliness scores were associated with the total number of ED visits over the previous year
16. Another study of 227 older women found that loneliness was associated with frequency of
physician visits and this was independent of socio-demographic factors and health status 17
. In
two separate studies that looked at the relationship between loneliness and frequency of general
practitioner (GP) consultations, no clear pattern emerged. One study found that loneliness was
significantly associated with frequency of consultation at the surgery, but not with the frequency
of home visits in a sample of 691 adults 18
, whereas the other study found no association between
loneliness and GP or other medical practitioner attendance in a sample of 1241 adults in the
community 19
.
One difficulty with interpreting this set of findings is the distinction between emergency
and planned health care use, which are very different behavioural phenomena. It is theoretically
more plausible to find associations between emergency health care use and loneliness, as planned
health care use may often be intentional planned preventive health care e.g. vaccination, which is
often though not always, characteristic of effective self-management of health in the community,
whereas emergency health care use can never be characterised in this way. Although some of
theses studies looked at emergency users only, GP consultations typically represent a
heterogenous range of emergency and planned attendances. It is important therefore to make this
distinction.
A potentially useful way of clarifying this issue is to examine both emergency and
planned hospital use separately in relation to loneliness. This type of analysis would show
Page 4 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
whether loneliness might be more reliably linked to certain types of health care use and could
potentially partly explain some previous conflicting results. In the present analysis we examined
whether loneliness was associated with emergency hospitalization and planned hospital inpatient,
i.e. overnight admissions in the previous year in a population survey of over two thousand older
adults20
.
Method
Participants were randomly selected community-dwelling older people identified by the
Register of Electors or postal address files in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) and Northern Ireland
(NI), respectively. Eligible participants were those aged 65 years and older living at private
residential addresses and able to participate in a research interview (response rates 73% (N=
2,033)). Participants were asked as part of structured interview if they used a hospital for medical
treatment in the last 12 months and whether visits were emergency hospitalizations or planned
inpatient, i.e. overnight, admissions . Loneliness was measured using a single item: “How often
in the last 12 months have you been bothered by loneliness?” This was measured on a 4 point
scale-Very Often, Quite Often, Not Very Often and Never. Depressive symptoms were measured
using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) 21
. Social participation was measured
using 2 items: “Over the last month were you able to: Attend events outside of your home (e.g.
community or social event) and Visit friends or family in their own home.” This was measured
on a 4 point scale- Without difficulty, With some difficulty, With much difficulty, Unable to do.
Perceived social support was measured with three items: “How often would each of the
following types of support be available to you if you needed it? 1. Someone who makes you feel
loved and appreciated, 2. Someone whom you can confide in and who will give you advice or
information, 3. Someone who will help you with practical tasks like preparing meals, household
Page 5 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
chores or shopping?” Responses were one 5 point scale- None of the time, a little of the time,
some of the time, most of the time, most of the time, all of the time. Participants were asked “Do
you have any longstanding illness, disability or infirmity? By long-standing I mean anything that
has troubled you over a period of time or that is likely to affect you over a period of time?” This
is a standard ROI and UK census question about chronic illness. Full methodological details of
the study are available elsewhere20
. In our analysis we used univariate and multivariate binary
logistic regression (1= attended, 0 =did not attend).
Results
Eleven percent (217/2033) of the entire sample (N=2,033; Mean age 74.1 years, standard
deviation 6.8, 43% male, 55% with an longstanding illness or disability, and 44% married) had
an emergency hospitalization i.e. an attenadance at the emergency department (ED) and 15%
(312/2033) had a planned inpatient admission (PA) in the previous year. Fifty –eight percent of
the sample responded Never, 27% Not very often, 11% Quite often and 4% Very often to the
question „How often in the last 12 months have you been bothered by loneliness?‟ The
corresponding ED attendance for these 4 categories were 8.8%, 10.8%, 16.3 % and 19.5%
respectively and for PA the figures were 14.2%, 18.4%, 13% and 19.5%. Figure 1 compares the
odds of health care use for both ED and PA by comparing each of the loneliness categories with
the never lonely category. This shows that as the frequency of loneliness increased the odds of
ED hospitalization increased, but the odds of PA did not. Table 1 presents univariate and
multivariate logistic regression analysis that show the associations between ED hospitalization
and PA in the last 12 months, loneliness and other risk factors. Marital status and living alone
were not included in the same model due to multicollinearity. The table shows that greater
loneliness was associated with approximately 29% higher odds of ED hospitalization in the
Page 6 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
previous year in multivariate analysis. There was not a significant association between loneliness
and PA. The multivariate analyses show that the association between loneliness and ED
hospitalization was not changed by the addition of covariates into the model, including
depressive symptomatology, social participation and social support.
Discussion
Our findings show that loneliness was associated with emergency hospitalization among
older community dwelling adults, whereas planned hospital inpatient admission was not. This
association was independent of a range of potential confounds, perhaps most interestingly
depression, social participation and social support. This confirms that loneliness appears to be
more than a component of depression or a dearth of social contact and social support. It is
important to acknowledge that the present cross-sectional data cannot determine direction of
causality, however there is evidence suggesting that loneliness is as heritable as major
personality traits such as neuroticism or agreeableness 9, which would lend support to the
proposal that loneliness could potentially predict emergency health care use rather than vice
versa.
There are a number of other limitations to the present study, mainly constraints due to the
nationally representative sampling approach undertaken. These are the self-report methodology
and the retrospective recall over the previous year, which may be prone to memory bias; the lack
of information on the reasons for health care use; and the single-item loneliness measure.
However, given the scarcity of population based data linking loneliness to health care use among
older adults, the present findings are clearly important in demonstrating that the association is
more likely to be observed with emergency rather than planned health care use.
Page 7 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
As loneliness was not associated with planned inpatient admissions it appears that
intentional and planned health care needs are not different between those who are lonely and
those who are not, whereas emergency health care use was different between those who are
lonely and those who were not. Those who are lonely may therefore have greater health care
needs. Persistently lonely individuals may be less able to cope effectively in managing their
health due to the behavioural, emotional and cognitive regulatory deficits that are key features of
loneliness 9. It is possible that in an emergency, those who are lonely can not source practical
social support in the community and some of the emergency health care use may be
inappropriate in that particular health problems may have otherwise been resolved in the
community; however reasons for emergency hospitalization and planned admissions were not
sought in this study. It is also possible that lonely individuals have more deleterious stress
related pathophysiological responses when a health threat occurs 14
and this may also partly
account for the greater emergency health care use. Future studies should examine whether
loneliness is associated with inappropriate emergency health care use among older adults in
order order to elucidate these issues.
Conclusion
Promoting the most efficient possible use of emergency services for increasing numbers
of older people is a high priority for health services worldwide, but many of these focus on more
clearly medical components of well-being, or else look at policies and procedures which promote
admission avoidance or facilitate discharge. Although interventions for loneliness22
have not yet
been shown to be effective in older populations, the findings of this study should prompt
renewed scrutiny of loneliness as a marker of vulnerability in opportunistic or population-based
Page 8 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
screening, as well as studies which further our understanding of the dynamics of loneliness and
possible measures to alleviate its impact on wellbeing.
Reference List
(1) Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a
fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:497-529.
(2) House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science.
1988;241:540-545.
(3) Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol. 2004;59:676-684.
(4) Thurston RC, Kubzansky LD. Women, loneliness, and incident coronary heart disease.
Psychosom Med. 2009;71:836-842.
(5) Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Aging and loneliness: Downhill quickly? Current Directions
in Psychological Science. 2007;16:187-191.
(6) Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Crawford LE et al. Loneliness and health: potential
mechanisms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:407-417.
(7) Blazer DG. Self-efficacy and depression in late life: a primary prevention proposal. Aging
Ment Health. 2002;6:315-324.
Page 9 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
(8) Boomsma DI, Cacioppo JT, Muthen B, Asparouhov T, Clark S. Longitudinal genetic
analysis for loneliness in Dutch twins. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10:267-273.
(9) Cacioppo JT, Patrick B. Loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection.
New York: W. W. Norton and Company; 2008.
(10) Cacioppo JT, Hawkey LC. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences. 2009;13:447-454.
(11) Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch
Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:234-240.
(12) Golden J, Conroy RM, Bruce I et al. Loneliness, social support networks, mood and
wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:694-700.
(13) Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific
risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol
Aging. 2006;21:140-151.
(14) Steptoe A, Owen N, Kunz-Ebrecht SR, Brydon L. Loneliness and neuroendocrine,
cardiovascular, and inflammatory stress responses in middle-aged men and women.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29:593-611.
Page 10 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
(15) Genell AK, Rosenqvist U. Heavy users of an emergency department--a two year follow-
up study. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25:825-831.
(16) Geller J, Janson P, McGovern E, Valdini A. Loneliness as a predictor of hospital
emergency department use. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:801-804.
(17) Cheng ST. Loneliness-distress and physician utilization in well-elderly females. Journal
of Community Psychology. 1992;20:43-56.
(18) Ellaway A, Wood S, Macintyre S. Someone to talk to? The role of loneliness as a factor
in the frequency of GP consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:363-367.
(19) Lauder W, Sharkey S, Mummery K. A community survey of loneliness. J Adv Nurs.
2004;46:88-94.
(20) McGee H, O'Hanlon A, Barker M et al. One Island -Two Systems. A comparison of
health status and health and social service use by community-dwelling older people in
the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Dublin: The Institute of Public Health in
Ireland; 2005.
(21) Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr
Scand. 1983;67:361-370.
Page 11 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
(22) Fokkema CM, van Tilburg TG. [Loneliness interventions among older adults: sense or
nonsense?]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2007;38:185-203.
Page 12 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review Only
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Table 1
Associations Between Health Care Use In The Last 12 Months, Loneliness And Other Risk Factors.
Emergency health care use in the last 12 months Planned admission in the last 12 months
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Univariate
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Multivariate 1*
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Multivariate 2
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Univariate
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Multivariate
Loneliness (higher scores = greater loneliness) 1.37 (1.17-1.59) 1.29 (1.08-1.55) 1.30 (1.09-1.56) 1.09 (0.94-1.25) 1.09 (0.92-1.28)
Longstanding illness, disability (1= yes, 0=no) 1.81 (1.34-2.43) 1.35 (0.98-1.87) 1.35 (0.98-1.88) 1.69 (1.31-2.17) 1.64 (1.25-2.15)
Male sex (1= yes, 0=no) 0.96 (0.72-1.28) 0.93 (0.68-1.27) 0.95(0.70-1.29) 1.43 (1.12-1.82) 1.49 (1.15-1.94)
Age (>80, 1= yes, 0=no) 1.28 (0.93-1.77) 1.15 (0.81-1.63) 1.13 (0.80-1.60) 1.14 (0.86-1.51) 1.16 (0.85-1.58)
Married (1= yes, 0=no) 1.04 (0.78-1.38) 1.31 (0.93-1.85) ------------------- 1.10 (0.86-1.40) 1.03 (0.77-1.38)
Living alone (1= yes, 0=no) 0.90 (0.68-1.20) --------------------- 0.73 (0.52-1.02) --------------------- ---------------------
Education (higher scores > education) 0.84 (0.73-0.97) 0.88 (0.76-1.01) 0.88 (0.77-1.02) 1.05 (0.96-1.15) 1.08 (0.99-1.18)
Depressive symptoms (higher scores >
symptoms)
1.13 (1.07-1.21) 1.04 (0.96-1.12) 1.03 (0.96-1.12) 1.05 (0.99-1.11) 0.96 (0.90-1.03)
Social participation (higher scores <
participation)
1.13 (1.07-1.20) 1.08 (1.01-1.16) 1.08 (1.00-1.16) 1.11 (1.05-1.17) 1.10 (1.03-1.17)
Page 13 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review Only
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Perceived social support (higher scores >
support)
1.03 (0.98-1.08) 1.05 (1.00-1.11) 1.05 (0.99-1.10) 1.02 (0.98-1.06) 1.04 (0.99-1.08)
* Did not include living alone due to multicollinearity with marital status.
Page 14 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review Only
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
1
1.24
1.97
2.48
1
1.36
0.9
1.46
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Never Not very often Quite often Very often
Emergency (Em) Planned (Pl)
Em CI: 0.88-1.74Pl CI: 1.03-1.78
How often in the last 12 months have you been bothered by loneliness? Odds ratio of health care use in the last year. CI: 95% Confidence interval
Em CI: 1.30-2.99 Pl CI: 0.58-1.38
Em CI: 1.41-4.38 Pl CI: 0.84-2.54
Page 15 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review Only
[Type text]
Running head: Loneliness and health care use
Figure 1.
Associations Between Loneliness And Emergency And Planned Hospital Use In The Previous 12 Months.
Page 16 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank other Healthy Aging Research Programme staff and Steering Group members
who contributed in this research: Ms. Rebecca Garavan, Dr. Frances Horgan, Dr Karen
Morgan, Dr. Emer Shelley (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI)), Dr Claire
Donnellan, Dr. David Hevey (Trinity College Dublin), Professor Richard Layte
(Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)), Dr. Vivienne Crawford, Mr. John
Dinsmore, and Professor Bob Stout (Queens University Belfast). We thank Professor
James Williams (ESRI) and Dr. Donal McDade (Social and Market Research) for
coordinating community interviews in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland,
respectively. We also sincerely thank research participants for their time and cooperation.
Professor Marie Johnston (University of Aberdeen, Scotland) and Professor Paul Baltes
(RIP) (Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany/University of Virginia)
have been external advisors to the Healthy Aging Research Programme, and we
acknowledge their support.
Financial Disclosure(s): This research was supported by a Programme Grant from the
Irish Health Research Board to Professor Hannah McGee (principal investigator, RCSI),
Professor Des O’Neill (Trinity College Dublin), Dr. Tony Fahey (ESRI) and Professor
Bob Stout (co-investigators).
Conflict of Interest Disclosures:
Elements of
Financial/Personal
Conflicts
*Author 1
GJ Molloy Author 2
HM McGee Author 3
D O’Neill Etc.
RM Conroy
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Employment or Affiliation X X X X
Grants/Funds X X X X
Page 17 of 18 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Review O
nly
Honoraria X X X X
Speaker Forum X X X X
Consultant X X X X
Stocks X X X X
Royalties X X X X
Expert Testimony X X X X
Board Member X X X X
Patents X X X X
Personal Relationship X X X X
Author Contributions:
Hannah McGee, Ronán Conroy and Des O’Neill were involved in the study concept and
design. Gerard Molloy and Hannah McGee were involved in the acquisition of data. All
authors were involved in analyses and interpretation of data and preparation of the
manuscript.
Sponsor’s Role: None.
Page 18 of 18Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960