la prise du temps: the captured time of the biocentric image

18
I would like to begin by saying how grateful I am to be given the opportunity to speak to you today, to have the space and :me to communally test some new ideas. The talks I am giving at the Transimage conference are very specula:ve. I am not a scien:st, nor do I claim to be. I am an historian of modern and contemporary art and architecture, researching and wri:ng about the interac:vi:es and overlaps in history and the present between the fields of biology, on the one hand, and art and architecture, on the other. The first of my two talks, “La Prise du temps: The Captured Time of the Biocentric Image,” queries the poli:cal value, symbolism, meaning, and poten:al agency of and/ or emana:ng from the biocentric image. Within this statement, there are primarily two elements of focus: what I mean by the “poli:cal” and “biocentric image.” In the introductory slides, we see photographs of the events of May 1968 in Paris compared to or juxtaposed with micrographic images taken by the Hungarian- American light ar:st and impresario György Kepes. The first slide is of a poster showing a woman throwing a brick, a piece of the Parisian street, symbolizing a mode of defiance against the greater powers of the French state and capitalism and a micrograph of a cross sec:on of a twig, from Structures in Art and in Science, ed. by György Kepes (1965), the meanings and values of which I would like to unpack here. Photomicrography is the technique for photographing microscopic subjects. 1

Upload: utdallas

Post on 02-Dec-2023

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IwouldliketobeginbysayinghowgratefulIamtobegiventheopportunitytospeaktoyoutoday,tohavethespaceand:metocommunallytestsomenewideas.ThetalksIamgivingattheTransimageconferenceareveryspecula:ve.Iamnotascien:st,nordoIclaimtobe.Iamanhistorianofmodernandcontemporaryartandarchitecture,researchingandwri:ngabouttheinterac:vi:esandoverlapsinhistoryandthepresentbetweenthefieldsofbiology,ontheonehand,andartandarchitecture,ontheother.Thefirstofmytwotalks,“LaPrisedutemps:TheCapturedTimeoftheBiocentricImage,”queriesthepoli:calvalue,symbolism,meaning,andpoten:alagencyofand/oremana:ngfromthebiocentricimage.Withinthisstatement,thereareprimarilytwoelementsoffocus:whatImeanbythe“poli:cal”and“biocentricimage.”Intheintroductoryslides,weseephotographsoftheeventsofMay1968inPariscomparedtoorjuxtaposedwithmicrographicimagestakenbytheHungarian-Americanlightar:standimpresarioGyörgyKepes.Thefirstslideisofapostershowingawomanthrowingabrick,apieceoftheParisianstreet,symbolizingamodeofdefianceagainstthegreaterpowersoftheFrenchstateandcapitalismandamicrographofacrosssec:onofatwig,fromStructuresinArtandinScience,ed.byGyörgyKepes(1965),themeaningsandvaluesofwhichIwouldliketounpackhere.Photomicrographyisthetechniqueforphotographingmicroscopicsubjects.

1

Thesecondslidesimilarlybringstogetheranimageofstudentsrio:ngandaphotomicrographofaCamel’stongue:10X,1951,borrowedformanunnamedscien:stbyKepesandplacedintheexhibi:onTheNewLandscape,towhichIreturnbelow.Indeed,riotsinthestreetsofParisandphotomicrographywithinanexhibi:onandbookseemprimafacietohavenothingincommon.

2

Thesecondslidesimilarlybringstogetheranimageofstudentsrio:ngandaphotomicrographofaCamel’stongue:10X,1951,borrowedformanunnamedscien:stbyKepesandplacedintheexhibi:onTheNewLandscape,towhichIreturnbelow.Indeed,riotsinthestreetsofParisandphotomicrographywithinanexhibi:onandbookseemprimafacietohavenothingincommon.

3

But,Ibringthemtogetherunderthephrase“prisedutemps,”whichisFrenchforthe“capturingof:me,”andwhichIborrowfromtheFrenchphilosopherMicheldeCerteau’sessayabouttheeventsofMay1968,“CapturingSpeech”[“Prisedeparole”],inorder,asIhavesaid,toquerythepossibilityofapoli:csatworkinbiocentricimagery.Beforege_ngintothis,thecruxofmytalk,letmequotedeCerteau.Hetellsus:“Thecaptureofspeechclearlyhastheformofarefusal.Itisaprotesta:on.Weshallseethatitsfragilityisduetoitsexpressionascontesta:on,toitstes:monyasnega:on.Therein,perhaps,liesitsgreatness.Butinreality,itconsistsinsta:ng,‘Iamnotathing.’Violenceisthegesturethatrejectsalliden:fica:on:‘Iexist’.”FordeCerteau,theuseoflanguageasamodeofresistanceinthestudentuprisingsofMay1968cons:tutedauniqueseizureofpower.deCerteau,Michel,CapturingSpeech&OtherPoliBcalEssays,trans.TomConley(Minneapolis,MN:UniversityofMinnesotaPress,1997)12.

4

Herewearelooking,onthelef/below,atas:llfromAdamZaretzky’s“DIYEmbryology”(2015)and,ontheright/above,DetailfromJillScom’sInterac:vetouchscreen,theSomabook(2013),whereweseeembryo-exposuretoalcohol.Intheseimages,Iamreferencingverygenerallythebiocentricimageryincontemporarybioart.InborrowinglaprisedutempsfromdeCerteau’slaprisedeparole,Iextractsolelytheideaofapoli:cs:thatthroughbiocentricimagery,andbiocentrism,wemightsimilarlysay,“wearenotthings–wearelivingandpartofimbricatedlivingsystems.”Thebiocentricimage,Iargue,isthecaptured:meofdynamiclifeinphotomicrography(andherebioart)andamamerof,moreliterally,“taking:me,”delibera:ngoverandthroughscien:ficknowledge.Inpar:cular,theFrenchphraselaprisedutempsreferstothedis:lla:onofthetemporalprocessofbiologicaldevelopmentins:llandmovingbiocentricimages.WhileIusetheword“biocentrism”torefertoscien:ficimagerydeployedinthecontextofmodernandcontemporaryart,thewordhasaveryspecificmeaningandlineage.

5

Itaketheterm“biocentrism”frommyresearchandnewbook,ArtasOrganism:BiologyandtheEvoluBonoftheDigitalImage,whichfocusesonthespreadofHungarianBauhauslerLászlóMoholy-Nagy’spedagogyandartprac:ce.HerewearelookingatMoholy-Nagy’sPainBng,Photography,Film[Malerei,Fotografie,Film]of1925,theeighthoffourteenvolumespublishedintheBauhausbücherserieslaunchedbyWalterGropiusin1919attheBauhausinWeimar,Germany.ThoughwrimensolelybyMoholy-Nagyandthusnotananthology,itcombinestextandscien:ficimagesinordertocreatenotsimplyavibrantcollageinbookformbuttheinchoateinscrip:onofthelightimage–photograph,photo-gram,x-rayimage,andsundryotherimagesofreflec:velight-displays/light-games[ReflektorischenLichtspiele]–aslivingimage.ThisideaiscentraltoMoholy-Nagy’sbiocentrism.

6

AccordingtoLászlóMoholy-NagyexpertOliverBotar,biocentrism[Biozentrik]isastrainofbiologis:cNeo-Roman:cism,whichmaterializedinGermanyinthemidnineteenthcenturyasaformofeduca:onbywayofnaturalformsandonenesswithnature.BiocentrisminMoholy-Nagy’sthinkingisdrivenbythemesofintui:on,idealism,holism,theunityofthemindandbody,andtheonenessoforganicandinorganicmamer.

7

Germanbiocentrismispartofthehistoryofecology,anddatesbacktothephilosophyandnaturalscienceofearlybiologistJohannWolfgangvonGoethe.Alaterinstanceinthe19thcenturyofthiskindofrela:onalandGestal:stthinkingisembodiedinthescien:ficworkofGermanbiologistErnstHaeckel.HerewearelookingatErnstHaeckel’sRadiolaria(1862)andAcBniae,plate49fromErnstHaeckel’sKunsUormenderNatur(1904).Whileweseewhirlsofcolorfullifeinbothimages,Haeckel’simageryofradiolariansbearsspecificinteresthereinthattheyare:nysingle-celledaqua:canimalsbarelyvisibletothenakedeye.Theyareearlyinstancesofmicrologicalimageryinscience.Haeckelrenderedtheseradiolariansinpartbasedonobserva:onandinpartonimagina:on.

8

Ge_ngbacktopoli:cs,weturntothescien:ficpresent,inpar:cularlifeinthepostgenomicera(aferthemappingofthegenomein2003).Fromwhencecomesagencythroughscience?Whatmightamorerela:onalandresponsivesenseof“agency”basedonEvelynFoxKeller’stakeonthegenome,forexample,bear?And,hereIquoteKeller:“Thebomomline:likeotherorganisms,humanbeingsarereac:vesystemsoneverylevelatwhichtheyarecapableofinterac:ng:cultural,interpersonal,cellular,andevengene:c.Thereconceptualiza:onofthegenome…(fromagen:ctoresponsive)allowsus–indeedobligesus–toabandonthedichotomiesbetweengene:csandenvironment,andbetweennatureandculture,thathavedrivensomuchfruitlessdebate,forsomanydecades.”Keller,EvelynFox,“ThePostgenomicGenome,”inSarahS.RichardsonandHalamStevens,eds.,Postgenomics:PerspecBvesonBiologyaVertheGenome(Durham,NC:DukeUniversityPress,2015)28-29.

9

Togettothecruxofmypaperinitsmostgeneralsense,whatisthepoli:calpowerofwhatDonnaHarawaycalls“art-scienceac:vism”?Howcantheknowledgeofbiofunc:onalismthatispartofthebiocentricimagebearapoli:csrootedinscien:ficknowledge:apoli:csbasedonfactsratherthansupers::ons?Haraway,Donna,“Anthropocene,Capitalocene,Chthulucene:StayingwiththeTrouble”,05/09/2014.hmps://vimeo.com/97663518.Accessed06/06/2016.

10

Takeforexample,“smartbacteria.”TheseimagesareofPaenibacillusdendri:formisgrowingintheagarofpetridishes.Theyareformallybeau:ful:colorfulimagesofdynamicpamerndevelopment.Func:onallyspeaking,theyshowtheself-engineeringskillsofbacteriainthatthespreadingpamernshelpthecolonyaccessmorefoodthatisinthemostefficientwayundergivencondi:ons.Scien:stshavedevelopedametrictodescribethissetofskillscalledthe"BacteriaSocial-IQScore.”Thescoremeasuresbacteria'shighlevelofsocialintelligence––howbacteriaworktogethertocommunicateandgrow.Thisleadstosignificantapplica:onsinmedicineandagriculture,butalsotouniqueideasofcollec:veinterac:onandintelligencerelatabletomammalsandplants.Ben-Jacob,Eshel,YoashShapira,andAlfredI.Tauber,“SmartBacteria,”inLynnMargulis,CelesteA.Asikainen,andWolfgangE.Krumbeineds.,ChimerasandConsciousness:EvoluBonandtheSensorySelf(Cambridge,MA:MITPress,2011)59.Anonymous,“Thegeniusofbacteria:Scien:stsdevelopIQtesttoassessandoutsmartbacteria’s‘socialintelligence’,”01/24/2011,phys.org/news/2011-01-genius-bacteria-scien:sts-iq-outsmart.html.Accessed06/06/2016,

11

Inthehistoryofart,imageslikethesewereintegratedintotherealmofart.In1951,GyörgyKepescuratedanexhibi:onofworklikethis–scien:ficimageryandphotographsofhisownlightart–attheMITHaydenGallery.Thiskindofworkwassimply,andImightaddincorrectly,understoodasformalism:beau:fulwhorlsandpamerns.

12

Inthehistoryofart,imageslikethesewereintegratedintotherealmofart.In1951,GyörgyKepescuratedanexhibi:onofworklikethis–scien:ficimageryandphotographsofhisownlightart–attheMITHaydenGallery.Thiskindofworkwassimply,andImightaddincorrectly,understoodasformalism:beau:fulwhorlsandpamerns.

13

Hereonceagainwearelookingatsmartbacteria.In1970,themedicaldoctor-cum-artcri:cBrianO’DohertywroteawonderfulprefacetoMicro-Art:ArtImagesinaHiddenWorld,acompendiumofphotomicrographicimagesandtextsbyLewisR.Wolberg,M.D.O’Dohertytakesapsychologicalapproachtothepenchanttoseetheinvisiblebywayoftechnologicalprosthe:cs.Hesays,“Themicroscopecanbeseenasaninstrumentofthis[the1957film,TheIncredibleShrinkingManandacertainensuing“scalelessness”]anxiety.Bydiminishingtheobserverandqueryinghisloca:oninspace,theselfislostinthegeneralinsurrec:onofobjectsthatfollows–makingthebodyamonstertoitself…”Iarguesomethingadjacenttothisidea:laprisedetempsofthebiocentricimage,suchasthese,triggersaprocessofaweandwonderwhichthenculminatesinthedriveforscien:ficliteracy:awilltounderstandthebiofunc:onalismoflivingcomplexsystems.O’Doherty,Brian,Preface,Micro-Art:ArtImagesinaHiddenWorld,byLewisR.Wolberg,M.D.(NewYork:HarryN.Abrams,1970)xv.

14

Herewearelookingatadiagramexplainingtheoriginofeukaryo:ccells,thatis,cellswithanucleussurroundedbyamembraneinwhichDNAisboundtogetherbyproteinsintochromosomes.Weareeukaryotes.Fromthischainofideascatalyzedbyknowingthebiologicallyfunc:onalsystemswelearn,forexample,thatsymbiogenesisplaysanessen:alroleinevolu:onandthediversifica:onofspecies.LifebegannotwiththeCambrianperiod541millionyearsago,butwithbacteriaintheArcheanEonsome4billionyearsago.Oureukaryo:ccellsarerootedin,evenmadeupof,thisbacteriallife.

15

Delibera:onoversci-arthybridimagescatalyzesadigressionofwonder,whichisthenfollowedbycon:nualspecula:on,recogni:onoftheorderunderlyingbeauty,andYügen.InthetermYügen,IinvoketheJapaneseconceptconno:ng“cloudyimpenetrability…excep:onaleleganceorgracefulness.”Theworddescribesanyshapeorformthatisintheprocessofchange,characterizing“movementins:llness”and“theembodimentofforminchangingsubstance.”Itisaprocess,Iwouldliketoargue,thatpromisesscien:ficliteracy.Gilbert,S.F.andM.Faber(1996),“LookingatEmbryos:TheVisualandConceptualAesthe:csofEmergingForm,”inAlfredI.Tauber(ed.)TheElusiveSynthesis:AestheBcsandScience,Dordrecht,NL:KluwerAcademicPublishers,133.Ibid.

16

Suchliteracyassurestodisplaceaworldorganizedforfartoolongaccordingtocertainhierarchies,suchasgene:csoverdevelopment,reduc:onismoverholism,linearityoversystems,andtheGreatChainofBeingoverrhizoma:cwonder.

17

18