ectomycorrhizal mushrooms xerocomus, paxillus, tuber–
TRANSCRIPT
Ectomycorrhizal mushrooms Xerocomus, Paxillus, Tuber –
aspects of multipartite interactions
between soil yeasts, bacteria and filamentous fungi
MSA, Fairbanks, AK, August 2011
Dirk Krüger 1*, Aleksandar Pavić 2, Andrey Yurkov 3, Kerstin Hommel 1,Dominik Begerow 3, Norbert Arnold 4, Žaklina Marjanović 2, and Mika Tarkka 1
1 UFZ-Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Soil Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany2 Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, Department for Life Sciences, Kneza Viseslava 1a, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia3 Geobotany Section, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsst. 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany4 IPB-Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Weinberg 3, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
Das verknüpfte Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. Möglicherweise wurde die Datei verschoben, umbenannt oder gelöscht. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Verknüpfung auf die korrekte Datei und den korrekten Speicherort zeigt.Das verknüpfte Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. Möglicherweise wurde die Datei verschoben, umbenannt oder gelöscht. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Verknüpfung auf die korrekte Datei und den korrekten Speicherort zeigt.Das verknüpfte Bild kann nicht angezeigt werden. Möglicherweise wurde die Datei verschoben, umbenannt oder gelöscht. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Verknüpfung auf die korrekte Datei und den korrekten
Speicherort zeigt.
2
3
4
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
Truffle Market Alba, Italy (from internet)
- unsuccessful in crop domestication- Italy ( e.g. Alba, Piedmont),
Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Hungary- EM partners:
Quercus, Corylus, Populus- in Serbia in deep mineral soils with CaCO3
2
ISOLATION OF BACTERIA
100 μl aliqots of PBS-Tween 20 applied to gleba, pipetted off,
plated on YMEA with 50mg/l cycloheximide and 40 mg/l
Nystatin, incubated 48h at 25˚C.
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
3
4
RESULTS
46 isolates grew on mannitol - CaCO3 agar
2 isolates with actinomycete morphology selected for experiments
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
Rhodococcus strain TMG025 II
Curtobacterium strain TMG034
Partial 16S rDNA phylogeny
RESULTSRhodococcus TMG025 II, Curtobacterium TMG 034 metabolism
- produce siderophores
- solubilize tricalcium-orthophosphate in NBRIP medium
- truffle storage sugar mannitol stimulates tricalcium-orthophosphate solubilization
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
5
Rhodococcus TMG025 II Curtobacterium TMG 034
RESULTSRhodococcus TMG025 II, Curtobacterium TMG 034 metabolism
- both strains degrade trehalose and beta-glucan
- Curtobacterium shows protease, chitinase and pectinase activites as well
6
Isolate Urease
Gelatinase
Caseinase
Tween80
Lipa
sea
Lechitina
se
Treh
alase
β‐glucan
ase
Chitina
se
Pectinase
CMC‐cellulase
Side
roph
ore
TMG025 II + ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ ‐ +
TMG034 ‐ ‐ + + ‐ ‐ + + + + ‐ +
Rhodococcus TMG025 II
Curtobacterium TMG 034
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
CONCLUDING
Bacteria, e.g. Actinobacteria (other data not shown here),
may foster nutrient uptake for mushrooms.
Bacteria may play a role in defending truffles against some, but may foster
the growth of other mushroom parasites (not shown here).
Bacteria may decay the fungus and be involved in hypogeous spore release.
7
Case 1 – Actinobacteria in Truffles
- EM fungus Paxillus- from UFZ grounds (Halle, Germany) under Tilia- by sequence Paxillus obscurisporus C. Hahn
8
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
Page 9
PBS-Tween 20 isolation from inside
mushroom
PBS-Tween 20 isolation from non-
sterile and semisterile (EtOH) surface
This is not a real mushroom.
9
ISOLATION OF BACTERIA AND YEASTS
RESULTSisolated yeasts:
basidiomycetes
ascomycete
10
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
Strain Identification results Collection number
YFB213* Kluyveromyces dobzhanskii CBS 11758YFB238* Trichosporon porosum n.a.YFB251 Mastigobasidium intermedium n.a.YFB252 Rhodotorula graminis n.a.YFB253 Holtermanniella festucosa n.a.YFB254 Rhodosporidium babjevae n.a.YFB255 Holtermanniella festucosa n.a.YFB256 Leucosporidiella muscorum n.a.YFB257 Mastigobasidium intermedium CBS 11759YFB258 Cystofilobasidium macerans n.a.YFB259 Mastigobasidium intermedium n.a.YFB260 Rhodotorula graminis n.a.YFB261 Rhodotorula graminis n.a.YFB262 Holtermanniella festucosa CBS 11757YFB263 Mastigobasidium intermedium n.a.YFB269 Cryptococcus victoriae n.a.YFB270 Rhodotorula graminis CBS 11678
note: yeasts in (decomposing) mushrooms known since 1940s (Anderson & Skinner 1947 in Mycologia)
*: isolated from Xerocomus (Boletales)
RESULTSbipartite cultures, tripartite cultures
controls
11
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
LOW NUTRIENT LEVEL MEDIUM (MNM)
Yeast Fungal growth (mm)YFB255 28,0 +/‐5,04 a (+)YFB259 25,6 +/‐3,50 a (+)YFB253 22,8 +/‐5,78 abNone 22 +/‐ 2,02 bYFB258 17,8 +/‐ 2,25 c (‐)YFB213* 14,5 +/‐ 2,73 cd (‐)YFB261 12,8 +/‐ 5,04 cd (‐)YFB263 12,4 +/‐ 3,16 d (‐)YFB269 12,1 +/‐ 2,17 d (‐)YFB256 11,6 +/‐ 0,92 d (‐)YFB254 11,5 +/‐0,93 d (‐)YFB252 11 +/‐ 2,27 d (‐)YFB270 11 +/‐1,07 d (‐)YFB251 10,6 +/‐ 0,74 d (‐)YFB257 10,6 +/‐0,74 d (‐)YFB260 10,4 +/‐1,51 d (‐)YFB262 10,1 +/‐0,64 d (‐)YFB238* 8,75 +/‐ 0,71 d (‐)
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
Only 2 yeast strains promote the growth:(In MEA 6 yeast strains).
As many as 14 yeast strains inhibit the growth:(In MEA 1 yeast strain).
Inhibition of Sepedonium is related to nutrient competition.
CONCLUDING
Yeasts are present in still fresh, not decomposing fruiting bodies.
Rhodotorula graminis : first report from Europe.
Note: Sepedonium infections cause early lysis of basidia, affecting fitness of host.
Yeasts thus can modify this effect.
Yeasts differ in their abilities to stimulate or inhibit Sepedonium.
Paxillus may be negatively impacted by common presence of Sepedonium and yeasts.
Yeasts rather support the growth of molds and increase the negative effects on
Paxillus. Many yeasts are actually from groups known to also possess adaptations
to mycoparasitism (e.g. haustoria in Holtermaniella).
Nutrient poor media rather imply that yeasts mainly have nutrient competition effect
on Sepedonium and Paxillus. In tripartite assays, antibiotics appeared
stronger component in interaction. 13
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
Case 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
- EM fungus Xerocomus chrysenteron andothers.- from Harz and Kyffhäuser Mts. in Germany
Xerocomus chrysenteronwith Hypomyces
microspermus (Anamorph Sepedonium
microspermum)
14
Page 15
PBS-Tween 20 isolation from inside
mushroom
PBS-Tween 20 isolation from non-
sterile and semisterile (EtOH) surface
This is not a real mushroom.
15
MATERIALS AND METHODSCase 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Page 1616
RESULTSCase 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Genbank Fungus accessiona
Xerocomus chrysenteron and X. badius fruiting bodies used for isolations
X. chrysenteron 2B1 Harzgerode HQ207691
X. chrysenteron 2B2 Harzgerode HQ207692
X. chrysenteron 2B4 Harzgerode HQ207693
X. chrysenteron 6A Kyffhäuser HQ207694X. chrysenteron 6B Kyffhäuser HQ207695X. badius 6C Kyffhäuser HQ207696
X. badius 8 Wernigerode HQ207697
X. badius 9A Wernigerode HQ207698
Genbank Fungus accessiona
Sepedonium microspermum isolates and their source fruiting bodies
Strain DK32 from X. chrysenteron 2B1 Harzgerode HQ207690
Strain DK34 from X. chrysenteron 2B2 Harzgerode HQ207686
Strain DK35 from X. chrysenteron 2B4 Harzgerode HQ207688
Strain DK38 from X. chrysenteron 6A Kyffhäuser HQ207687A Accession numbers of the ribosomal DNA sequences.
Page 1717
RESULTS
Genbank Fruiting interaction
Strain Identitya accession bodyb Tissuec phenotyped
92FB Pseudomonas AB566042 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B2 o p
93FB Pseudomonas AB566043 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B2 o p
94FB Mycetocola AB566044 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B2 i p
95FB Pseudomonas AB566045 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B2 o v
96FB Mycobacterium AB566046 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B2 o p
97FB Streptomyces AB566047 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os y
98FB Streptomyces AB566048 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os y
99FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566049 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os v
100FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566050 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os v
101FB Streptomyces AB566051 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os v
102FB Streptomyces AB566052 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os p
104FB Streptomyces AB566053 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os z
106FB Streptomyces AB566054 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B1 os n.a.
134FB Burkholderia AB566055 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
135FB Streptomyces AB566056 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os y
136FB Streptomyces AB566057 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
137FB Streptomyces AB566058 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
138FB Pseudomonas AB566059 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
139FB Bacillus AB566060 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
140FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566061 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
141FB Micrococcus AB566062 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
142FB Burkholderia AB566063 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
143FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566064 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 i n.a.
144FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566065 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 i n.a.
145FB Micrococcus AB566066 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
147FB Caulobacter AB566067 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
148FB Streptomyces AB566068 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
149FB Streptomyces AB566069 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os x
150FB Streptomyces AB566070 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os x
151FB Streptomyces AB566071 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
152FB Streptomyces AB566072 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
153FB Streptomyces AB566073 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
154FB Phyllobacterium AB566074 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
155FB Burkholderia AB566075 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os v
156FB Pseudomonas AB566076 Xerocomus chrysenteron 2B4 os n.a.
214FB Enterobacteriaceae AB566077 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6A o n.a.215FB Pseudomonas AB566078 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6A o v217FB Pseudomonas AB566079 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6A o w218FB Plantibacter AB566080 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6A o n.a.219FB Burkholderia AB566081 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6B os v224FB Sphingomonas AB566082 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6B o n.a.226FB Micrococcineae AB566083 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6B o n.a.227FB Curtobacterium AB566084 Xerocomus chrysenteron 6B o v
228FB Burkholderia AB566085 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.
229FB Pedobacter AB566086 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.230FB Pseudomonas AB566087 Xerocomus badius 6C o v231FB Variovorax AB566088 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.232FB Erwinia AB566089 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.233FB Streptomyces AB566090 Xerocomus badius 6C os n.a.234FB Streptomyces AB566091 Xerocomus badius 6C os x236FB Pedobacter AB566092 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.237FB Sphingomonas AB566093 Xerocomus badius 6C o w240FB Stenotrophomonas AB566094 Xerocomus badius 6C o n.a.241FB Streptomyces AB566095 Xerocomus badius 6C os n.a.275FB Burkholderia AB566096 Xerocomus badius 8H o w276FB Burkholderia AB566097 Xerocomus badius 8H o n.a.277FB Burkholderia AB566098 Xerocomus badius 8H o n.a.278FB Ewingella AB566099 Xerocomus badius 9A o vaBased on partial 16S rNA sequencebXerocomus chrysenteron 2B1, 2B2, 2B4, 6A, 6B, and X. badius 6C, 8H, 9Aco, outer surface; os, outer surface pre‐sterilized; i, from inside the tissue
dp, positive, n.a., not affected; v‐z, increasingly inhibitive
43 strains from Xerocomus chrysenteron,15 strains from Xerocomus badius
Gram positive taxa the collection contained dominantly Actinobacteria(Streptomycetaceae, Mycobacteriaceae, Micrococcaceae, Microbacteriaceae), and Bacillaceae.
Streptomyces highlighted : 16 from X. chrysenteron, 3 from X. badius.
Case 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Page 1818
RESULTSCase 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Most bacteria have negative impact on Sepedonium (triangle = control).
Page 1919
RESULTSCase 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
132F
B15
3FB
151F
BNon
e13
7FB
152F
B24
1FB
149F
B10
6FB
98FB
150F
B10
5FB
148F
B13
6FB
97FB
104F
B23
4FB
135F
B
Xero
com
us b
adiu
s gr
owth
(mm
)
** ** ** ** ** ** **
Influence of streptomycetes on the growth of Xerocomus badius:Growth of X. badius in co‐culture with 17 mushroom associated streptomycete isolates was measured 8 weeks after fungal inoculation. The mean of each experiment with 8 replicates is indicated. To the control treatment without bacteria (“none”) significantly different values according to student’s T‐test (p < 0.01) are indicated by two asterisks.
0
2
4
6
8
10
Chi
tinas
e ac
tivity
102FB135FB
150FB149FB
234FB98FB
104FB97FB
a aa
ab b
bcbc
c
Chitin degradation by the Sepedonium microspermuminhibiting streptomycetes.
20
RESULTSCase 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Base peak chromatograms of the metabolite spectra of S. microspermum (dotted line) and of S. microspermum under the influence of the culture extract of Streptomyces. Asterisks indicate derivatives of antibiotics with peptaibole backbone, identified by mass spectrometry.
CONCLUDING
21
Xerocomus surfaces bind a diverse community of bacteria, and the
taxonomic groups of bacteria are distinct in their ability to inhibit the growth of the
mycoparasite Sepedonium microspermum. From our limited collection,
the streptomycetes were among the most antagonistic against S. microspermum.
Streptomyces present on fruiting bodies are not only active in inhibiting
the growth of Sepedonium, but are less inhibitory to their host mushroom
than to the parasite.
Currently the volatile and soluble secondary metobolites produced by the players
are beiing investigated. A strain of Streptomyces has also been sequenced
(which one?).
Case 3 – Bacteria and Sepedonium on Xerocomus
Page 24
Mycelial growth of Sepedonium microspermum 2B2-DK34 in co-culture with Xerocomus fruitbody associated actinomycetes (all were Streptomyces). Significantly different co-culture phenotypes are indicated.
a a b dc
Co-culture phenotype
none Act153FB Act137FB Act104FBAct149FB
Bacterial inoculation with
Page 25
from a previous poster
UPGMA on pairwisedistances of inhibition
correlates well with 16S phylogeny (ME)
Next?Any specificity of bacterial assemblages in Boletales?
RESULTSInfluence of fruiting body associated yeasts on the growth of the mycoparasite Sepedonium chrysospermum: impact of low nutrient levels
(MMN 1/10) and cross-wall separation between the microorganisms. Significant differences according to ANOVA and Tukey test ( p <0.05).
26
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
LOW NUTRIENT LEVEL MEDIUM
Yeast strain Fungal growth (mm)YFB255 28,0 +/‐5,04 a (+)YFB259 25,6 +/‐3,50 a (+)YFB253 22,8 +/‐5,78 abNone 22 +/‐ 2,02 bYFB258 17,8 +/‐ 2,25 c (‐)YFB213 14,5 +/‐ 2,73 cd (‐)YFB261 12,8 +/‐ 5,04 cd (‐)YFB263 12,4 +/‐ 3,16 d (‐)YFB269 12,1 +/‐ 2,17 d (‐)YFB256 11,6 +/‐ 0,92 d (‐)YFB254 11,5 +/‐0,93 d (‐)YFB252 11 +/‐ 2,27 d (‐)YFB270 11 +/‐1,07 d (‐)YFB251 10,6 +/‐ 0,74 d (‐)YFB257 10,6 +/‐0,74 d (‐)YFB260 10,4 +/‐1,51 d (‐)YFB262 10,1 +/‐0,64 d (‐)YFB238 8,75 +/‐ 0,71 d (‐)
YEAST VOLATILES
Yeast strain Fungal growth (mm)YFB255 30,9 +/‐ 4,05 aNone 29,7 +/‐ 4,52 aYFB253 29,4 +/‐ 0,92 aYFB213 29,0 +/‐ 3,34 aYFB259 28,3 +/‐ 2,25 aYFB251 27,1 +/‐ 8,2 abYFB238 26,8 +/‐ 1,28 aYFB260 22,6 +/‐ 6,16 abYFB258 19,9 +/‐ 2,30 b (‐)YFB256 19,2 +/‐ 5,61 b (‐)YFB270 19,1 +/‐ 8,01 b (‐)YFB252 16,5 +/‐ 2,83 b (‐)YFB254 15,5 +/‐ 9,76 bc (‐)YFB263 15,0 +/‐ 6,36 b (‐)YFB262 14,4 +/‐ 8,12 bc (‐)YFB261 12,4 +/‐ 9,15 bc (‐)YFB269 11,9 +/‐ 4,36 bc (‐)YFB257 8,00 +/‐ 0,76 c (‐)
RESULTSbipartite cultures, tripartite cultures
controls
27
Case 2 – Yeasts and Sepedonium on Paxillus
RESULTSRhodococcus TMG025 II, Curtobacterium TMG 034 interaction with molds
Case 1 – Streptomycetes in Truffles
Verticillium sp.(color producer)
TMG016 II(Pseudomonas
fluorescens)
red lesion of Tuber magnatum
fruiting body
28
Dirk, this hasNothing to do with the actinos