diffusion tensor mri of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
TRANSCRIPT
Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuroninvolvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Miriam Sach, Gerhard Winkler, Volkmar Glauche, Joachim Liepert, Bernhard Heimbach,Martin A. Koch, Christian BuÈchel and Cornelius Weiller
Department of Neurology, Neuroimage Nord, University
Hospital Hamburg, Eppendorf, Germany
Correspondence to: Miriam Sach, MD, Klinik und
Poliklinik fuÈr Neurologie, UKE, Martinistrasse 52,
20246 Hamburg, Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
SummaryAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressiveneurodegenerative system disorder affecting both upperand lower motor neurons. Despite supportive electro-physiological investigations, the involvement of theupper motor neuron is often dif®cult to assess at anearly stage of disease. Diffusion tensor MRI provides anestimate of the orientation of ®bre bundles in whitematter on the basis of the diffusion characteristics ofwater. Diffusivity is generally higher in directions along®bre tracts than perpendicular to them. This degree ofdirectionality of diffusion can be measured as fractionalanisotropy. Changes in tissue structure due to degener-ation of the corticospinal ®bres can lead to a modi®ca-tion of the degree of directionality which can bedetected by diffusion tensor MRI. We investigated 15patients with ALS, six of whom had no clinical signs ofupper motor neuron involvement at the time of MRIinvestigation, but developed pyramidal tract symptoms
later in the course of their disease. These patients met
the El Escorial criteria as their disease progressed. We
found a decrease in fractional anisotropy in the corti-
cospinal tract, corpus callosum and thalamus in all 15
ALS patients, including the patients without clinical
signs of upper motor neuron lesion, compared with
healthy controls. Regression analysis showed a negative
correlation between fractional anisotropy and central
motor conduction time obtained by transcranial mag-
netic stimulation, allowing spatial differentiation
between the degenerated corticospinal tract ®bres that
supply the upper and lower extremities. Thus, diffusion
tensor MRI can be used to assess upper motor neuron
involvement in ALS patients before clinical symptoms
of corticospinal tract lesion become apparent, and it
may therefore contribute to earlier diagnosis of motor
neuron disease.
Keywords: diffusion tensor MRI; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; upper motor neuron; corticospinal tract; transcranial
magnetic stimulation
Abbreviations: ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMCT = central motor conduction time; DTI = diffusion tensor
imaging; EPI = echoplanar imaging; LMN = lower motor neuron; MEP = motor evoked potential; MNI = Montreal
Neurological Institute; ROI = region of interest; STEAM = stimulated echo acquisition mode; TMS = transcranial
magnetic stimulation; SNR = signal-to-noise ratio; UMN = upper motor neuron
Received March 22, 2003. Revised August 18, 2003. Accepted September 23, 2003. Advanced Access publication November 7, 2003
IntroductionThe diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a
progressive neurodegenerative system disorder affecting both
upper and lower motor neurons (LMN), is mainly based on
clinical criteria with possible symptoms such as progressive
weakness of voluntary muscles, muscular atrophy, spasticity,
tendon jerks and Babinski signs. Upper motor neuron (UMN)
pathology often starts in the primary motor and premotor
cortex, with secondary degeneration of motor ®bres and
gliosis along the corticospinal tract (Davidoff, 1990). The
lesions of the LMN include the brainstem and spinal cord.
Diagnosis at an early stage of the disease is desirable because
of the poor prognosis of ALS, with an average life expectancy
of 25 months after onset of symptoms, and the necessity of
excluding other curable diseases. It is often dif®cult to decide
whether the UMN is involved. This is because of only
discrete UMN signs in clinical investigation or severe
Brain Vol. 127 No. 2 ã Guarantors of Brain 2003; all rights reserved
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh041 Brain (2004), 127, 340±350
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
simultaneous lesions of the LMN. In contrast, LMN
involvement can be detected subclinically using supportive
techniques, such as needle electromyography. Both neuro-
physiological and neuroimaging techniques have been used to
evaluate UMN pathology, but there are currently no sensitive
techniques available in clinical practice for objectively
assessing UMN damage at an early stage of the disease.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurements
may contribute to the diagnosis of ALS by revealing a
clinically undetectable UMN dysfunction. However, the
diagnostic sensitivity in unravelling UMN lesions, in par-
ticular those of limb muscles compared with cranial muscles,
is rather low (Urban et al., 2001), and published results are
inconsistent (Eisen et al., 1990; Berardelli et al., 1991; Claus
et al., 1995). The triple stimulation technique can increase the
sensitivity to UMN lesions but it is not yet being used
routinely as it is dif®cult to apply (Buhler et al., 2001).
In neuroimaging, MRI-FLAIR (¯uid-attenuated inversion
recovery) images and T2- and proton density-weighted MRIs
may show increased signal intensity in the white matter
(Hecht et al., 2001). However, these ®ndings are rather
unspeci®c and are not yet quanti®able (Karitzky and Ludolph,
2001). Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy is useful for
assessing UMN involvement in ALS (Ellis et al., 2001), but it
is not sensitive enough to reveal early changes in the
subcortical white matter in the motor region. This is due to
considerable overlap between the ranges of metabolic peak
area ratios from patients in an early stage of the disease and
those from healthy control subjects (Ellis et al., 1998).
Functional MRI and magnetization transfer are also promis-
ing methods. Further investigations are needed to elucidate
their signi®cance as diagnostic and prognostic tools in
patients with ALS (Tanabe et al., 1998; Brooks et al., 2000a).
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a relatively new method
in structural neuroimaging. It allows the estimation of the
orientation of ®bre bundles in white matter on the basis of the
diffusion characteristics of water. Diffusivity is generally
higher in directions along ®bre tracts than perpendicular to
them (Chenevert et al., 1990). This can be described
mathematically by a tensor, which is characterized by its
three eigenvectors and the corresponding eigenvalues. The
eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue (the ®rst
eigenvector) indicates the predominant orientation of ®bres in
the given voxel. The directionality of diffusion can be
quanti®ed by the fractional anisotropy index, which is a
rotationally invariant property of the diffusion tensor (Basser
and Pierpaoli, 1996). Fractional anisotropy values range from
0 (no directional dependence of diffusion coef®cients) to 1
(diffusion along a single direction). Changes in tissue
structure (in this case degeneration of the corticospinal ®bres)
can lead to a modi®cation of the degree of directionality,
which can be detected by diffusion tensor MRI. Therefore, in
degenerated white matter tracts of patients with ALS one
would expect to ®nd changes in the anisotropy of diffusion in
comparison with healthy subjects. DTI has already produced
promising results in assessing UMN pathology in patients
with ALS (Ellis et al., 1999). The authors demonstrated that
fractional anisotropy correlates with UMN involvement in
ALS patients. For the analysis of diffusion characteristics,
Ellis and colleagues used six prede®ned regions of interest
(ROIs) along white matter tracts descending through the
posterior limb of the internal capsule.
In our study, we were interested in white matter changes in
the motor system at different levels of the brain caused by
ALS. Thus, we calculated the fractional anisotropy voxelwise
in a larger area not con®ned to the internal capsule. This area
covered ®bre bundles descending from the motor and
premotor cortex to the brainstem. We calculated voxel-
based statistics on the fractional anisotropy maps to demon-
strate fractional anisotropy differences in patients with ALS
compared with healthy controls, using SPM99 (Friston et al.,
1995). As the fractional anisotropy correlates with UMN
lesions, we additionally investigated the correlation between
fractional anisotropy and central motor conduction time
(CMCT), which was derived from TMS. To explore the
usefulness of DTI for assessing early UMN lesions, we
studied a subgroup of six patients without clinical signs of
UMN involvement at the time of MRI investigation. These
patients developed clinical evidence of corticospinal tract
degeneration in the course of their disease. In accordance
with our anatomical a priori hypothesis regarding white
matter changes in ALS along the corticospinal tract, we
corrected for multiple comparisons using the small volume
correction method implemented in SPM99.
MethodsSubjectsWe studied a total of 15 patients with TMS, conventional MRI and
DTI. Among these, nine had de®nite, probable or possible ALS and
six displayed no clinical signs of UMN involvement according to the
revised El Escorial criteria (Brooks et al., 2000b) at the time of
investigation, but developed clinical pyramidal tract symptoms later
in the course of their disease. Patients were compared with 12
healthy, age-matched controls. Clinical details of the patients are
provided in Table 1. As suggested by the World Federation of
Neurology (Brooks et al., 2000b), we identi®ed signs of UMN
degeneration as any of the following: hyper-re¯exia with patho-
logical spread of re¯exes; clonic tendon re¯exes; preserved re¯exes
in weak wasted limbs; spasticity; emotional lability; loss of
super®cial abdominal re¯exes; and Babinski sign. Although brisk
deep tendon re¯exes in the absence of muscle weakness and wasting
are not considered as a UMN sign according to the El Escorial
criteria, this clinical feature is also listed in Table 1. LMN signs
included muscular weakness, wasting and fasciculation. Time after
onset of symptoms ranged from 6 to 24 months (mean 11.9 months,
SD 5.6). Age ranged from 27 to 63 years (mean 52.2 years, SD 11.8).
The healthy controls were free of neurological or other diseases and
were age-matched, with an age range from 28 to 63 years (mean 52.8
years, SD 10.9). Only subjects without contraindications for MRI
were included. Written informed consent to participation in the study
was obtained from all patients and healthy controls. The study was
approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital
Eppendorf.
DTI of early upper motor neuron lesion in ALS 341
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
Tab
le1
Cli
nic
al
det
ail
sof
pati
ents
wit
hA
LS
Pat
ien
t,se
xD
isea
seo
nse
t(y
r)D
isea
sed
ura
tio
n(m
on
ths)
El
Esc
ori
alcr
iter
iaC
lin
ical
on
set
UM
Nin
vo
lvem
ent
LM
Nin
volv
emen
t
01
,F
59
11
(Pro
bab
leA
LS
lab
ora
tory
-su
pp
ort
ed)
Bu
lbar
(Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,b
risk
DT
Rin
all
lim
bs)
B,
dysp
hag
ia,
loss
of
mas
sete
rre
¯ex
,re
sp.
insu
ff.,
C,
par
esis
of
vel
um
/fac
ial
musc
les,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
02
,F
62
6D
e®n
ite
AL
SL
imb
Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,B
abin
ski
sig
n,
bri
skD
TR
inal
lw
eak
was
ted
lim
bs
B,
dysp
hag
ia,
loss
of
mas
sete
rre
¯ex
,te
trap
ares
is,
musc
leat
rophy,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
03
,M
58
6(D
e®n
ite
AL
S)
Bu
lbar
(Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,b
risk
DT
Rin
all
wea
kw
aste
dli
mb
s)B
,dysp
hag
ia,
par
esis
of
faci
alm
usc
les
(all
lim
bs)
,at
rophy
of
arm
,tr
unk
(all
lim
bs)
04
,F
27
10
Po
ssib
leA
LS
Bu
lbar
Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,h
yp
erac
tiv
eg
agre
¯ex
,at
ten
uat
edab
do
min
alre
¯ex
esP
ares
isof
tongue,
vel
um
,li
ps
and
arm
05
,F
59
6(P
rob
able
AL
S)
Bu
lbar
(Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,B
abin
ski
sig
n,
leg
spas
tici
ty)
B,
dysp
hag
ia,
par
esis
of
right
arm
,m
usc
leat
rophy
of
arm
s,gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
06
,M
63
9P
rob
able
AL
S,
lab
ora
tory
-su
pp
ort
edL
imb
Hy
per
-re¯
exia
rig
ht
leg
,B
abin
ski
sig
nP
ares
isof
arm
s/le
ftfo
ot,
musc
leat
rophy,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
07
,M
56
6P
rob
able
AL
SB
ulb
arH
yp
er-r
e¯ex
iab
oth
arm
s,lo
sso
fab
do
min
alre
¯ex
esB
,dysp
hag
ia,
par
esis
of
arm
san
dri
ght
leg,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
08
,M
58
14
Pro
bab
leA
LS
Lim
bL
egsp
asti
city
,B
abin
ski
sig
n,
abd
om
inal
re¯
exes
atte
nu
ated
,b
risk
DT
Rin
all
wea
kw
aste
dli
mb
sT
etra
par
esis
,m
usc
leat
rophy,
C,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
09
,M
57
21
Pro
bab
leA
LS
Lim
bL
oss
of
abd
om
inal
re¯
exes
,fo
ot
clo
nu
sT
etra
par
esis
wit
hat
rophy,
C,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion,
atte
nuat
ion
of
DT
Rle
ftar
m1
0,
M5
61
3P
rob
able
AL
S,
lab
ora
tory
-su
pp
ort
edL
imb
Att
enu
atio
no
fab
do
min
alre
¯ex
es,
Bab
insk
isi
gn
Par
esis
of
legs/
trunk,
atro
phy
of
legs,
loss
of
DT
Rri
ght
leg,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
11
,M
31
24
Pro
bab
leA
LS
Lim
bH
yp
er-r
e¯ex
iari
gh
tar
m,
leg
s,ab
do
min
alre
¯ex
esat
ten
uat
edP
ares
isan
dm
usc
leat
rophy
of
arm
s,gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion,
C1
2,
M3
71
5(P
oss
ible
AL
S)
Lim
b(H
yp
er-r
e¯ex
iaan
dsp
asti
city
of
leg
s)T
etra
par
esis
,at
rophy,
DT
Rof
arm
sre
duce
d1
3,
M6
11
7(P
oss
ible
AL
S)
Lim
b(B
risk
DT
Rin
the
wea
kw
aste
dri
gh
tle
g)
Par
esis
and
musc
leat
rophy
of
the
legs,
gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion
14
,M
42
8(P
rob
able
AL
Sla
bo
rato
ry-s
up
port
ed)
Lim
b(H
yp
er-r
e¯ex
iale
ftli
mb
s,B
abin
ski
sig
n)
Dysa
rthri
a,®
bri
llat
ion,
par
esis
of
both
arm
s,fa
scic
ula
tion
both
arm
s,an
dch
est
15
,F
57
12
De®
nit
eA
LS
Bu
lbar
Em
oti
on
alla
bil
ity
,lo
sso
fab
do
min
alre
¯ex
es,
Bab
insk
isi
gn
,sp
asti
city
of
leg
sB
,dysp
hag
ia,
faci
alm
usc
leat
rophy,
loss
of
mas
sete
rre
¯ex
,te
trap
ares
is,
atro
phy
both
arm
s,gen
eral
fasc
icula
tion,
C
F=
fem
ale;
M=
mal
e;B
=b
ulb
arp
aral
ysi
sw
ith
dy
sart
hri
a,p
ares
isan
dat
rop
hy
of
the
ton
gu
e;D
TR
=d
eep
ten
do
nre
¯ex
es;
C=
cram
ps;
()=
clin
ical
upper
and
low
erm
oto
rneu
ron
sign
sw
hic
hth
esi
xA
LS
pat
ien
tsw
ho
had
no
sym
pto
ms
of
UM
Nle
sio
nat
the
tim
eo
fth
eM
RI
scan
dev
elo
ped
asth
eir
dis
ease
pro
gre
ssed
;bra
cket
sar
eal
souse
dfo
rth
ere
sult
ing
El
Esc
ori
ald
iag
no
sis
that
af®
rmed
the
dia
gn
osi
so
fA
LS
inth
issu
bg
rou
p.
Inth
eco
urs
eo
fth
eir
dis
ease
,al
lp
atie
nts
cou
ldb
eca
teg
ori
zed
acco
rdin
gto
the
revis
edE
lE
scori
alcr
iter
ia(B
roo
ks
eta
l.,
20
00
b);
`gen
eral
fasc
icu
lati
on
'an
d`m
usc
leat
rop
hy
'ap
pea
rin
the
tab
lein
the
case
of
LM
Nsi
gn
sin
all
lim
bs
asw
ell
asth
etr
unk.
342 M. Sach et al.
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
Transcranial magnetic stimulationTMS was delivered by a Magstim magnetic stimulator 200 HP
(Magstim Company, Dyfed, UK) using a 90-mm circular coil.
Initially, we determined the optimal coil position. This was de®ned
as the position in which the largest motor evoked potential (MEP)
was produced in the target muscle. We recorded EMG signals from
the contralateral ®rst dorsal interosseus and anterior tibial muscle via
surface electrodes (Viking IV; Nicolet, Kleinostheim, Germany) and
analysed them off-line. Threshold was de®ned as the lowest stimulus
intensity capable of inducing an MEP with an amplitude of at least
0.05 mV in ®ve of 10 trials, the muscle being tested in the resting
state. Then the stimulus intensity was increased to 20% above
threshold, and stimuli were applied during slight voluntary
contraction. We also obtained MEPs by stimulating the cervical
and lumbar spinal roots to calculate the CMCT. F-waves of the ulnar
and peroneal nerve were measured to calculate peripheral motor
conduction times. MEP amplitudes were expressed as percentages of
the maximal M response amplitude (MEP amplitude ratio) and
compared with values of healthy, age-matched subjects (Kloten
et al., 1992).
MRI protocol and data analysisMRIs were acquired on a 1.5 Tesla MR system (Magnetom Vision,
Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with 25 mT/m maximum gradient
strength. Head movement was limited by a vacuum ®xation cushion.
Structural T1-weighted images with a resolution of 1 3 1 3 1 mm3
were acquired using three-dimensional fast low angle shot (FLASH)
imaging [¯ip angle 30°, repetition time (TR) 15 ms, echo time (TE)
5 ms, matrix 256 3 256 3 196]. For DTI, we used a single-shot
stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) sequence (¯ip angle
15°, TR 8872 ms, TE 65 ms) (Nolte et al., 2000). The STEAM
sequence is an MRI sequence which yields single-shot images within
a measuring time of ~600 ms. We chose STEAM rather than
echoplanar imaging (EPI) sequences, which are widely used for
diffusion-weighted imaging, because of the crucial advantages of
STEAM for our study. EPI sequences characteristically display
signal loss and geometric distortions caused by susceptibility
gradients in orbitofrontal and inferior temporal brain areas
(Johnson and Hutchison, 1985). In particular, in the vicinity of
air±tissue interfaces (e.g. brainstem), signal alteration and distor-
tions become a problem when using EPI in whole-brain studies to
cover regions from the cortex to the brainstem, as in our study (Nolte
et al., 2000). At the level of the internal capsule, the ferrous basal
ganglia also lead to signal loss, resulting in a decreased signal-to-
noise ratio (SNR) when using EPI sequences. The susceptibility
artefacts of EPI may be reduced by using segmented instead of
single-shot EPI, although the susceptibility to motion due to
segmentation cannot be removed completely by correction methods
(Atkinson et al., 2000). Additionally, eddy current effects arising
from switching strong diffusion gradients (Nolte et al., 2000)
contribute to image artefacts in EPI. These eddy currents depend on
the direction and amplitude of the diffusion gradients and can be
reduced only to a limited degree (Koch and Norris, 2000).
In comparison with EPI, the STEAM sequence exhibits a lower
SNR. To increase the SNR in the tensor maps, data acquisition was
repeated 20 times (scan time of 25 min for DTI). The number of
averages was not increased further, so as not to impair patient
compliance and comfort. We measured the SNR on the averaged
images obtained with a b value of 0 s/mm2 (where b = g2G2d2
(D ± d/3), g = gyromagnetic ratio; G = gradient amplitude; d =
gradient pulse duration; D = delay between the leading edges of the
gradient pulses) in an ROI in the posterior limb of the internal
capsule at the expected location of the pyramidal tract ®bres. The
SNR was de®ned as the ratio of the mean signal intensity in the
internal capsule to the standard deviation of the signal in a
background ROI outside the brain (Hunsche et al., 2001). This
calculation provided an SNR of 96.5. Previous studies recommended
Fig. 1 Voxels with a signi®cant decrease in fractional anisotropy the pyramidal tract, corpus callosum and right thalamus (shown in green)in 15 ALS patients compared with healthy controls. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Pyramidal tract (21, ±15, ±6; globalmaximum with P < 0.05, corrected for entire volume; ±24 ±12, 12), corpus callosum (1, ±12, 24) and right thalamus (9, ±12, 4) in thiscoronal section. (B) Transverse view of pyramidal tract in the posterior half of the posterior limb of the internal capsule (21, ±15, ±6; ±24,±12, 12). Statistical fractional anisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) of ALS patients versus controls are superimposedon a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI. Corrected P values (small volume correction) are given in Table 2.
DTI of early upper motor neuron lesion in ALS 343
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
an SNR of 20 in images obtained with a b value of 0 s/mm2 for a
reliable estimate of parameters derived from DTI (Basser et al.,
1996; Hunsche et al., 2001).
Because of our interest in imaging the corticospinal tract from the
primary motor and premotor cortex to the internal capsule and the
brainstem, we chose STEAM rather than EPI because of its
insensitivity to eddy currents and susceptibility gradients, especially
in the vicinity of air±tissue interfaces, such as the brainstem (Nolte
et al., 2000), to guarantee anatomically reliable diffusion tensor maps.
For diffusion-weighted imaging, the matrix size was 56 3 64 and
the ®eld of view was 168 3 192 mm2. The imaging volume of 20
coronal slices comprised pyramidal tract ®bres descending from the
primary motor and premotor cortex to the brainstem [y = 32 mm to
y = ±49 mm; coordinates in the Montreal Neurological Institute
(MNI) space], slice thickness 3 mm without a gap between slices, 20
coronal slices (maximum of possible number of slices with the
software) and voxel size 3 3 3 3 3 mm. Diffusion weighting was
obtained with a Stejskal±Tanner spin echo preparation (Stejskal and
Tanner, 1965) with b = 750 s/mm2 and six gradient directions
(gradient coordinate system, x, y, z): (0, 1, 1); (0, 1, ±1); (1, 0, 1); (1,
0, ±1); (1, 1, 0); and (1, ±1, 0). In addition, we acquired a reference
image without diffusion weighting.
Data processing was performed in Matlab 5.3 (MathWorks,
Natick, MA, USA). As the STEAM sequence is insensitive to eddy
currents, correction of geometrical distortion (shift, shear and scale
artefacts) was not necessary. The images of each subject were
realigned and the T1-weighted data set was spatially normalized to
the template using the software package SPM99 (Friston et al.,
1995). Individual brain masks were used to exclude the scalp from
normalization. The resulting af®ne and non-linear transformations
were applied to the diffusion-weighted data. The diffusion gradient
directions were rotated according to every rigid rotation in the
process of normalization. The normalization allows a voxelwise
group comparison based on the common stereotactic MNI space
(Friston et al., 1995). To ensure correct normalization of the MRIs,
we used voxel-based morphometry on the white matter segment of
the structural T1-weighted images. Diffusion tensor maps were
computed voxelwise on the normalized data with multivariate linear
regression (Basser et al., 1994) using SPM99. Fractional anisotropy
was derived from the diffusion tensor and the fractional anisotropy
maps were smoothed with a Gaussian ®lter of 6 mm FWHM (full-
width half-maximum) to validate the statistical inference for
calculation of the corrected P values. The residuals were tested for
normal distribution, an assumption for valid statistical inference
through the probabilistic behaviour of Gaussian random ®elds
(Worsley, 1994) as implemented in SPM99. We performed two
voxel-based statistics on the fractional anisotropy maps using
SPM99. First, fractional anisotropy in patients was compared with
that in healthy controls in a two-sample t-test. Secondly, a linear
regression was calculated to determine the correlation between
fractional anisotropy and CMCT in ALS patients separately for arms
and legs. Patients with absent MEPs due to paresis and muscular
atrophy or prolongation of peripheral motor conduction time were
excluded from the regression analysis. Because of our a priori
hypothesis regarding the pyramidal tract, we also performed small
volume correction for multiple comparisons. Ellis et al. (1999)
previously reported reduced fractional anisotropy in the posterior
limb of the internal capsule in ALS patients compared with healthy
controls. We centred the correction volume (sphere of 8 mm) at
voxels with local fractional anisotropy maxima within the pyramidal
tract from the primary motor and premotor cortex to the brainstem
(P < 0.05, corrected). The images presented are thresholded at
P < 0.01, uncorrected. To visualize the eigenvector, we show the
projection of the ®rst eigenvector onto the image planes.
ResultsThe voxel-based morphometry on the white matter segments
of the structural T1-weighted images did not show any
differences between patient and control groups, elucidating
the accurate normalization of the images. Thus, any differ-
ences in fractional anisotropy can be attributed to differences
in the diffusion-weighted images.
Fig. 2 Voxels with signi®cantly decreased fractional anisotropy underneath the motor and premotor cortex (shown in green) in 15 ALSpatients compared with controls. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Coronal section at y = ±18. Pyramidal tract descending fromthe motor cortex (24, ±18, 39; ±21, ±21, 42) and premotor cortex (±18, ±18, 60). (B) Coronal section at y = ±3. Pyramidal tract bilaterallyunderneath the premotor cortex (21, ±3, 42; ±42, ±3, 33). Statistical fractional anisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) aresuperimposed on a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI. Main ®bre direction is shown by the dashed yellow lines. For corrected Pvalues after small volume correction, see Table 2.
344 M. Sach et al.
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
We found a bilateral decrease in fractional anisotropy in
the posterior half of the posterior limb of the internal capsule
(right, P < 0.00001; left, P < 0.012, corrected) and in the
corona radiata underneath the motor cortex (right, P < 0.03;
left, P < 0.006, corrected) and premotor cortex (right,
P < 0.018; left, P < 0.001, corrected) in the 15 patients
with ALS compared with healthy controls (Figs 1 and 2,
Table 2). The global maximum was located in the internal
capsule (21, ±15, ±6) with P < 0.046, corrected for entire
volume. The decrease in fractional anisotropy in the
pyramidal tract extended to the brainstem (right, P < 0.022;
left, P < 0.042, corrected) (Fig. 3, Table 2). Fractional
anisotropy was also reduced in the corpus callosum (1, ±12,
24) and right thalamus (9, ±12, 4) in ALS patients compared
with healthy subjects (P < 0.01, uncorrected) (Figs 1 and 3A).
Seven out of 15 patients had a pathological CMCT
obtained by TMS to at least one extremity (Table 3). Two
patients without any signs of UMN involvement on clinical
investigation displayed pathological prolongation of the
CMCT (Table 3).
The regression analysis revealed a negative correlation
between fractional anisotropy and CMCT to the upper and
lower extremities. Figure 4 shows regions with negative
correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT separ-
ately for the arms and legs. They were located in the internal
capsule (right arm, P < 0.033; left arm, P < 0.020, corrected;
left leg, P < 0.053, corrected) and in the corona radiata
underneath the motor and premotor cortex (right arm,
P < 0.034; right leg, P < 0.035, corrected) (Fig. 4, Table 4).
The diagrams in Fig. 4 show the regression lines for each
extremity with the corresponding correlation coef®cient r and
the statistical P value.
The six patients without any clinical signs of UMN lesion
at the time of MRI investigation also showed a bilateral
Fig. 3 Voxels with a signi®cant decrease in fractional anisotropy in the caudal pyramidal tract ®bres to the brainstem (shown in red) in 15ALS patients compared with healthy subjects. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Coronal view of pyramidal tract ®bres in thebrainstem (9, ±18, ±21; ±6, ±15, ±21). (B) Transverse view of pyramidal tract ®bres descending through the brainstem (9, ±18, ±21; ±6, ±15, ±21). Statistical fractional anisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) are superimposed on a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI. The dashed yellow lines show the projection of the ®rst eigenvector, which corresponds to the main ®bre direction.Corrected P values (small volume correction) are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Regions of decreased fractional anisotropy in 15 ALS patients versus healthy controls within the pyramidal tractat the small volume correction level (sphere of 8 mm) centred at voxels with local maxima (Figs 1±3)
Region 15 ALS patients compared with healthy controls
x, y, z Z score P corrected
Pyramidal tract in the internal capsule (Fig. 1A, B) 21, ±15, ±6, 4.54 0.000±24, ±12, 12 3.61 0.012
Pyramidal tract in the brainstem (Fig. 3A, B) 9, ±18, ±21 3.45 0.022±6, ±15, ±21 3.27 0.042
Pyramidal tract underneath motor cortex, BA 4 (Fig. 2A, B) 24, ±18, 39 3.37 0.030±21, ±21, 42 3.79 0.006
Pyramidal tract underneath premotor cortex, BA 6 (Fig. 2B) 21, ±3, 42 3.51 0.018±42, ±3, 33 4.29 0.001±18, ±18, 60 3.31 0.037
Coordinates (x, y, z) are in MNI space. BA = Brodmann area; P corrected = P value corrected for multiple comparisons.
DTI of early upper motor neuron lesion in ALS 345
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
Table 3 Central motor conduction time (ms) of patients with ALS
Patient, sex M. interosseus dorsalis DI M. tibialis anterior
Right Left Normal Right Left Normal
01, F 8.1 8.3 8.7 16.2 14.7 19.902, F 8.7 7.7 8.7 26.2 22.1 19.903, M 6.4 6.8 7.8 15.1 14.5 17.704, F 7.9 7.5 7.8 12.9 12.5 17.205, F 8.7 7.9 7.8 16.5 16.8 17.706, M 7.1 7.0 8.7 15.3 17.0 19.907, M 7.9 7.8 7.8 16.1 15.8 17.708, M 0M 0M 7.8 14.9 15.1 17.709, M 8.4 6.2 8.7 16.4 16.4 19.910, M 9.7 8.7 7.8 26.3 24.8 17.711, M 0M 9.2 7.8 19.7 14.4 17.712, M 0M 0M 7.8 0M 0M 17.713, M 5.8 exc. 8.7 19.5 0M 19.914, M 0M 9.0 7.8 19.3 16.9 17.715, F 0M 0M 7.8 0M 0M 17.7
F = female; M = male; 0M = absent MEP due to paresis and muscular atrophy; normal = upper limit of normal values for age of thepatient (Kloten et al., 1992); exc. = excluded due to prolongation of peripheral motor conduction time. Bold face indicates prolongedcentral motor conduction time.
Fig. 4 Voxels with negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT to the extremities are shown in green (hands) and red(legs) in patients with ALS. Overlapping voxels are shown in yellow. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Coronal section at y = ±12.Negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT to hands (24, ±12, 12; ±27, ±12, 15) and to leg (±27, ±18, 15) in thepyramidal tract at level of the internal capsule. (B) Coronal section at y = ±18. Negative correlation between fractional anisotropy andCMCT to hand (21, ±18, 42) and leg (12, ±15, 57) in pyramidal tract ®bres descending from the motor and premotor cortex.(C) Transverse view of regions with negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT in the posterior half of the posteriorlimb of the internal capsule with pyramidal tract ®bres supplying the hands (24, ±12, 12; ±27, ±12, 15) and leg (±27, ±18, 15). A±C showstatistical fractional anisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) superimposed on a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI.Corrected P values (small volume correction) are given in Table 4. The surrounding diagrams display the regression line for eachextremity with the corresponding correlation coef®cient r and statistical P value.
346 M. Sach et al.
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
reduction in fractional anisotropy in the corona radiata
underneath the motor cortex (right, P < 0.021, corrected) and
premotor cortex (right, P < 0.016; left, P < 0.02, corrected)
and in the posterior half of the posterior limb of the internal
capsule (right, P < 0.001; left, P < 0.034, corrected) (Fig. 5,
Table 5). The decrease in fractional anisotropy in the
pyramidal tract involved ®bre bundles leading to the
brainstem (right, P < 0.019; left, P < 0.045, corrected)
(Fig. 6, Table 5). Additionally, fractional anisotropy was
reduced in the corpus callosum (not shown) and in the right
thalamus (10, ±12, 7, P < 0.01, uncorrected) (Fig. 5B) in
comparison with healthy subjects.
DiscussionWe investigated the ®bre integrity of the cerebral white
matter in ALS patients compared with healthy controls using
DTI and TMS. First, our voxel-based statistics showed
decreased ®bre integrity in the corticospinal tract ®bres
descending from the motor and premotor cortex to the
internal capsule and brainstem. Secondly, we found a
negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and
CMCT in the corticospinal tract ®bres. The correlation
analysis enables an anatomical subdivision of the corticosp-
inal tract between ®bres supplying the upper and lower
extremities. Thirdly, a subgroup of patients with no signs of
UMN lesion at the time of MRI investigation, who developed
pyramidal tract signs later in the course of their disease,
already showed reduced ®bre integrity in the corticospinal
tract underneath the premotor and motor cortex, in the
internal capsule and in the brainstem in DTI. Additionally, we
demonstrated reduced fractional anisotropy in the thalamus
and in the corpus callosum in all patients investigated.
Corticospinal tract changes in ALS patientsversus controlsOur voxel-based statistic showed a signi®cant bilateral
decrease in fractional anisotropy in the posterior half of the
posterior limb of the internal capsule of patients with ALS
compared with healthy controls. This result agrees well with
the known pathology of the combined motor neuron disease
and the localization of the corticospinal tract ®bres in the
internal capsule (Hanaway and Young, 1977). A recent study
using prede®ned ROIs for analysis of diffusion characteristics
along white matter tracts descending through the internal
Fig. 5 Voxels with signi®cantly decreased fractional anisotropy in the pyramidal tract underneath the motor and premotor cortex, in theinternal capsule and in the right thalamus (shown in green) in a subgroup of ALS patients without upper motor neuron signs at the time ofMRI investigation, in comparison with healthy controls. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Coronal view at y = ±3: pyramidal tractunderneath the premotor cortex (39, ±3, ±39; ±42, ±3, 33). (B) Coronal view at y = ±12: pyramidal tract underneath the motor cortex (30,±9, 39); pyramidal tract in the internal capsule (21, ±15, ±6; ±24, 12, 12); right thalamus (10, ±12, 7; P < 0.01, uncorrected). (C)Transverse view of pyramidal tract ®bres in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (21, ±15, ±6; ±24, ±12, 12). Statistical fractionalanisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) are superimposed on a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI. Corrected P-values (small volume correction) are provided in Table 5.
Table 4 Regions of decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) correlated with central motor conduction time (CMCT)separately for arms and legs in patients with ALS within the pyramidal tract at the small volume correction level (sphereof 8 mm), centred at voxels with local maxima (Fig. 4)
Region Correlation FA and CMCT to arms Correlation FA and CMCT to legs
x, y, z Z score P corrected x, y, z Z score P corrected
Pyramidal tract in internal capsule (Fig. 4A, C) 24, ±12, 12 3.34 0.033±27, ±12, 15 3.48 0.020 ±27, ±18, 15 3.21 0.053
Pyramidal tract underneath motor cortex,BA 4/premotor cortex, BA 6 (Fig. 4B)
21, ±18, 42 3.33 0.034 12, ±15, 57 3.32 0.035
Coordinates (x, y, z) are in MNI space. BA = Brodmann area; P corrected = P value corrected for multiple comparisons.
DTI of early upper motor neuron lesion in ALS 347
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
capsule also demonstrated a reduction in the fractional
anisotropy in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (Ellis
et al., 1999). Because our ®eld of view was not con®ned to the
internal capsule but also included the primary motor and
premotor cortex and parts of the brainstem, we were able to
assess ®bre disintegration at different levels of the motor
system. Thus, we also detected a decrease in fractional
anisotropy in more caudal parts of the corticospinal tract,
comprising the mesencephalon and pons. Additionally, we
found a decrease in fractional anisotropy underneath the
motor and premotor cortex in ALS patients compared with
controls.
The decrease in fractional anisotropy underneath the motor
cortex corresponds to degeneration of motor ®bres emerging
from the primary motor cortex (Davidoff, 1990). About 60%
of pyramidal tract axons originate from the primary motor
cortex (Brodmann area 4) while the remaining ®bres arise
from the premotor cortex (Brodmann area 6) and the parietal
lobe (Davidoff, 1990). Thus, the reduced fractional aniso-
tropy underneath the premotor cortex can be explained by
disintegration of pyramidal tract ®bres emerging from the
premotor cortex. Anatomical connections between the
premotor and motor cortex could also contribute to the
decrease in fractional anisotropy. Clinically, ALS patients
may display degenerative changes in the premotor cortex
(Lawyer and Netsky 1953; Pioro et al., 1994). This can result
in degeneration of the ®bres emerging from the premotor
cortex, resulting in a decrease in fractional anisotropy
underneath it. Hence, we demonstrated white matter disinte-
gration along the corticospinal tract.
Extramotor involvement in ALS and whitematter changes beyond the corticospinal tractThe decrease in fractional anisotropy in the corpus callosum
re¯ects the neuropathological ®ndings of degenerated pyr-
Fig. 6 Voxels with a signi®cant decrease in fractional anisotropy in the caudal pyramidal tract ®bres (shown in red) in ALS patientswithout signs of upper motor neuron lesion, compared with healthy controls. Coordinates are in MNI space (mm). (A) Coronal view ofpyramidal tract ®bres descending to the brainstem (12, ±18, ±18; ±9, ±18, ±21). (B) Transverse view of pyramidal tract ®bres in themesencephalon (12, ±18, ±18; ±9, ±18, ±21). Statistical fractional anisotropy results (thresholded at P < 0.01, uncorrected) superimposedon a spatially normalized T1-weighted MRI. Main ®bre orientation is shown by the dashed yellow lines. Corrected P values (smallvolume correction) are given in Table 5.
Table 5 Regions of decreased fractional anisotropy in ALS patients without upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement at thetime of investigation within the pyramidal tract at the small volume correction level (sphere of 8 mm), centred at voxelswith local maxima (Figs 5 and 6)
Region ALS patients with no UMN signs versus controls
x, y, z Z±score P corrected
Pyramidal tract underneath premotor cortex, BA 6 (Fig. 5A) 39, ±3, 39 3.49 0.016±42, ±3, 33 3.42 0.020
Pyramidal tract underneath motor cortex, BA 4 (Fig. 5B) 30, ±9, 39 3.41 0.021Pyramidal tract in the internal capsule (Fig. 5B, C) 21, ±15, ±6 4.32 0.001
±24, ±12, 12 3.22 0.034Pyramidal tract in the brainstem (Fig. 6A, B) 12, ±18, ±18 3.44 0.019
±9, ±18, ±21 2.85 0.045
Coordinates (x, y, z) are in MNI space; BA = Brodmann area; P corrected = P value corrected for multiple comparisons.
348 M. Sach et al.
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
amidal tract bundles running across the middle of the corpus
callosum in patients with ALS (Brownell et al., 1970). It also
corresponds to the atrophy of the corpus callosum that is often
found in ALS and to other pyramidal tract degeneration
processes (e.g. in familiar spastic paralysis), which are often
observed in conventional MRI (Yamauchi et al., 1995;
Krabbe et al., 1997). Severe atrophy in the anterior fourth of
the corpus callosum is also associated with cognitive decline
and psychiatric symptoms in ALS (Yamauchi et al., 1995).
Many pyramidal tract axons terminate in, or send collateral
branches to, a number of supraspinal structures (e.g. the
striatum, sensory and motor nuclei of the thalamus, red
nucleus, pontine nuclei, midbrain and bulbar reticular
formation, inferior olive, dorsal column nuclei, trigeminal
nuclei) (Davidoff, 1990). Regarding the thalamus, necropsy
studies have shown degeneration in the thalamus in patients
with ALS (Iwanaga et al., 1997). The decrease in fractional
anisotropy in the thalamus in this study agrees well with this
result. In addition, ALS patients with impaired verbal ¯uency
showed signi®cantly attenuated rCBF responses in the
anterior thalamic nuclear complex in PET studies (Kew
et al., 1993). Patients with familiar ALS also revealed
bilateral thalamic hypoperfusion as well as parietal and
frontal hypoperfusion in single photon emission computed
tomography (SPECT) (Kumar and Abdel-Dayem, 1999).
In addition to the areas reported above, we found decreased
fractional anisotropy in extramotor regions in the frontal lobe
[underneath the left inferior frontal gyrus (Brodmann areas
44, 45 and 47) and underneath the medial frontal gyrus
(Brodmann areas 8 and 9)]. Similar areas have been reported
in previous ALS studies (Lloyd et al., 2000; Ellis et al., 2001).
Correlation between fractional anisotropy andCMCTA regression analysis was calculated to determine the
correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT ob-
tained by TMS. The displayed regions exhibited a negative
correlation between fractional anisotropy and CMCT to all
extremities in patients with ALS. In these voxels, an increase
in CMCT was associated with a decrease in fractional
anisotropy. The separation of the CMCTs to all extremities
into four groups (one extremity per group) and the correlation
with fractional anisotropy for each extremity allows the
anatomical differentiation of the corticospinal tract between
®bres to the arms and legs. The observed topology of the
corticospinal tract ®bres to the arms and legs in the internal
capsule corresponds to the known anatomical topology. In the
internal capsule the motor ®bres to the legs run posterior and
lateral to the ®bres to the arm. In contrast, the white matter
®bres to the legs directly underneath the premotor and motor
cortex are located medial to the ®bres supplying the upper
extremity, as we showed in the coronal section. These results
suggest an in¯uence of white matter disintegration in the
corticospinal tract on the prolongation of the CMCT in ALS
patients.
Patients without signs of UMN involvement atthe time of MRI investigationThis study demonstrated that ALS patients without any
clinical evidence of UMN lesion at the time of MRI
investigation also showed a bilateral reduction in fractional
anisotropy in the posterior limb of the internal capsule,
underneath the motor and premotor cortex and in the
brainstem, in comparison with healthy controls.
Additionally, the fractional anisotropy of the corpus callo-
sum, right thalamus and frontal lobe in these patients was
reduced when compared with that in normal subjects. Hence,
DTI can be used to detect early lesions of the corticospinal
tract in patients with ALS and may therefore contribute to
earlier diagnosis of the disease in the future. This result
matches ®ndings from post-mortem cytochemistry analyses
in patients with the progressive muscular atrophy variant of
ALS, who frequently have undetected corticospinal tract
pathology (Ince et al., 2003). We are planning single-subject
analyses of ALS patients without clinical signs of UMN
involvement in order to explore the clinical impact of DTI on
the assessment of UMN lesions. This may help to differen-
tiate between upper and LMN involvement at an early stage
of the disease.
AcknowledgementsWe wish to thank all the patients and test subjects for their
cooperation in the study. This work was supported by a grant
from the Karberg Stiftung.
References
Atkinson D, Porter DA, Hill DL, Calamante F, Connelly A. Sampling and
reconstruction effects due to motion in diffusion-weighted interleaved
echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 101±9.
Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues
elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;
111: 209±19.
Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion
tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994; 103: 247±54.
Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Cruccu G, Mercuri B, Manfredi M. Electrical and
magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage
due to stroke or motor neurone disease. Electroencephalogr Clin
Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 389±96.
Brooks BR, Bushara K, Khan A, Hershberger J, Wheat JO, Belden D, et al.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) clinical studies in ALSÐ
paradigms, problems and promises. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor
Neuron Disord 2000a; 1 Suppl 2: S23±32.
Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL. El Escorial revisited: revised
criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph
Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000b; 1: 293±9.
Brownell B, Oppenheimer DR, Hughes JT. The central nervous system in
motor neurone disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1970; 33: 338±57.
Buhler R, Magistris MR, Truffert A, Hess CW, Rosler KM. The triple
stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower
limbs. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 938±49.
DTI of early upper motor neuron lesion in ALS 349
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from
Chenevert TL, Brunberg JA, Pipe JG. Anisotropic diffusion in human white
matter: demonstration with MR techniques in vivo. Radiology 1990; 177:
401±5.
Claus D, Brunholzl C, Kerling FP, Henschel S. Transcranial magnetic
stimulation as a diagnostic and prognostic test in amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1995; 129 Suppl: 30±4.
Davidoff RA. The pyramidal tract. Neurology 1990; 40: 332±9.
Eisen A, Shytbel W, Murphy K, Hoirch M. Cortical magnetic stimulation in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13: 146±51.
Ellis CM, Simmons A, Andrews C, Dawson JM, Williams SC, Leigh PN. A
proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in ALS: correlation with
clinical ®ndings. Neurology 1998; 51: 1104±9.
Ellis CM, Simmons A, Jones DK, Bland J, Dawson JM, Hors®eld MA, et al.
Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS.
Neurology 1999; 53: 1051±8.
Ellis CM, Suckling J, Amaro E Jr, Bullmore ET, Simmons A, Williams SC,
et al. Volumetric analysis reveals corticospinal tract degeneration and
extramotor involvement in ALS. Neurology 2001; 57: 1571±8.
Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ.
Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;
3: 165±89.
Hanaway J, Young RR. Localization of the pyramidal tract in the internal
capsule of man. J Neurol Sci 1977; 34: 63±70.
Hecht MJ, Fellner F, Fellner C, Hilz MJ, Heuss D, Neundorfer B. MRI-
FLAIR images of the head show corticospinal tract alterations in ALS
patients more frequently than T2-, T1- and proton-density-weighted
images. J Neurol Sci 2001; 186: 37±44.
Hunsche S, Moseley M, Stoeter P, Hedehus M. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging
at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial observations. Radiology 2001; 221: 550±6.
Ince PG, Evans J, Knopp M, Forster G, Hamdalla HH, Wharton SB, et al.
Corticospinal tract degeneration in the progressive muscular atrophy
variant of ALS. Neurology 2003; 60: 1252±8.
Iwanaga K, Hayashi S, Oyake M, Horikawa Y, Hayashi T, Wakabayashi M,
et al. Neuropathology of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of long
duration. J Neurol Sci 1997; 146: 139±43.
Johnson G, Hutchison JM. The limitations of NMR recalled-echo imaging
techniques. J Magn Reson 1985; 63: 14±30.
Karitzky J, Ludolph AC. Imaging and neurochemical markers for diagnosis
and disease progression in ALS. J Neurol Sci 2001; 191: 35±41.
Kew JJ, Goldstein LH, Leigh PN, Abrahams S, Cosgrave N, Passingham RE,
et al. The relationship between abnormalities of cognitive function and
cerebral activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A neuropsychological
and positron emission tomography study. Brain 1993; 116: 1399±423.
Kloten H, Meyer BU, Britton TC, Benecke R. Normal values and age-related
changes in magneto-electric evoked compound muscle potentials.
[German]. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr 1992; 23: 29±36.
Koch M, Norris DG. An assessment of eddy current sensitivity and
correction in single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging. Phys Med Biol
2000; 45: 3821±32.
Krabbe K, Nielsen JE, Fallentin E, Fenger K, Herning M. MRI of autosomal
dominant pure spastic paraplegia. Neuroradiology 1997; 39: 724±7.
Kumar M, Abdel-Dayem HM. Three generations of amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis in a family: SPECT brain perfusion ®ndings. Clin Nucl Med
1999; 24: 539±40.
Lawyer T, Netsky MG. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A clinicoanatomical
study of ®fty-three cases. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1953; 69: 171±92.
Lloyd CM, Richardson MP, Brooks DJ, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh PN.
Extramotor involvement in ALS: PET studies with the GABA(A)
ligand [(11)C]¯umazenil. Brain 2000; 123: 2289±96.
Nolte UG, Finsterbusch J, Frahm J. Rapid isotropic diffusion mapping
without susceptibility artefacts: whole brain studies using diffusion-
weighted single-shot STEAM MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:
731±6.
Pioro EP, Antel JP, Cashman NR, Arnold DL. Detection of cortical neuron
loss in motor neuron disease by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic
imaging in vivo. Neurology 1994; 44: 1933±8.
Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the
presence of a time-dependent ®eld gradient. J Chem Phys 1965; 42: 288±
92.
Tanabe JL, Vermathen M, Miller R, Gelinas D, Weiner MW, Rooney WD.
Reduced MTR in the corticospinal tract and normal T2 in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 1163±9.
Urban PP, Wicht S, Hopf HC. Sensitivity of transcranial magnetic
stimulation of cortico-bulbar vs. cortico-spinal tract involvement in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). J Neurol 2001; 248: 850±5.
Worsley KJ. Local maxima and the expected Euler characteristic of
excursion set of c2, F and t ®elds. Adv Appl Probab 1994; 26: 13±42.
Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Ouchi Y, Nagahama Y, Kimura J, Asato R, et al.
Corpus callosum atrophy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci
1995; 134: 189±96.
350 M. Sach et al.
by guest on April 2, 2016
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/D
ownloaded from