developmental expression patterns of ccr5 and cxcr4 in the rhesus macaque brain
TRANSCRIPT
Developmental expression patterns of CCR5 and CXCR4
in the rhesus macaque brain
S.V. Westmoreland a,*, X. Alvarez a, C. deBakker a, P. Aye a, M.L. Wilson a,b,K.C. Williams c, A.A. Lackner a
aDivision of Comparative Pathology, New England Regional Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School,
One Pine Hill Drive, Southborough, MA 01772-9102, USAbSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Campus, Jacksonville, IL 62650, USA
cDivision of Viral Pathogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Received 27 June 2001; received in revised form 10 October 2001; accepted 19 October 2001
Abstract
Emerging data indicate that chemokine receptors on neurons and glia in the central nervous system (CNS) play a role in normal CNS
development, intercellular communication, and the neuropathogenesis of AIDS. To further understand chemokine receptors in the brain and
explore their potential role in HIV neuropathogenesis, particularly in pediatrics, we examined the regional and cellular distribution of CCR5
and CXCR4 in normal fetal, neonatal, and adult rhesus macaques. CCR5 and CXCR4 were detected by immunohistochemistry and
immunofluorescence within the cytoplasm of subpopulations of neurons in the neocortex, hippocampus, basal nuclei, thalamus, brain stem,
and cerebellum and by flow cytometry on the surface of neurons and glia. Interestingly, expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 increased
significantly ( p < 0.05) from birth to 9 months of age. We further characterize this dynamic developmental pattern of CCR5 and CXCR4
expression in resident cells of the CNS. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: CCR5; CXCR4; Chemokine receptors; Brain; Neurons; Glia; Macaque; HIV; SIV
1. Introduction
Patients with AIDS frequently suffer from a debilitating
neurologic syndrome with children exhibiting a higher inci-
dence of dysfunction than do adults (Ammann, 1994; Bel-
man, 1994; Epstein et al., 1986; Wilfert et al., 1994). The
neurologic disease is postulated to result from HIV-induced
neuronal injury and loss (dropout) (Asare et al., 1996; Everall
et al., 1991; Ketzler et al., 1990; Lipton et al., 1991; Masliah
et al., 1992a), particularly apoptotic death (Adle-Biassette et
al., 1995; Gelbard et al., 1995). There is evidence using the
SIV-infected rhesus macaque model that similar neuronal
injury and death occurs in SIV infection (Gonzalez et al.,
2000; Jordan-Sciutto et al., 2000; Li et al., 1999; Marciario et
al., 1999; Tracey et al., 1997). Seven-transmembrane, G-
protein-coupled chemokine receptors have been demonstra-
ted on neurons and glia from both humans and non-human
primates, and may play a role in mediating HIV- and SIV-
induced neuronal injury and death, respectively (Coughlan et
al., 2000; Halks-Miller et al., 1997; Hesselgesser and Horuk,
1999; Horuk et al., 1996, 1997; Lavi et al., 1997; Ohagen et
al., 1999; Qin et al., 1998; Rottman et al., 1997; van der Meer
et al., 2000, 2001; Westmoreland et al., 1998; Zhang et al.,
1998).
We have previously shown that these receptors are func-
tional on rhesus macaque fetal neurons by demonstrating that
the relevant chemokine induces calcium flux (Klein et al.,
1999). Although much has been written about the impor-
tance of chemokine receptors in leukocyte function, chemo-
taxis, and as coreceptors for HIVand SIV cell entry, little has
been published relating to their role in normal physiologic
processes in cells of the central nervous system (CNS).
Emerging data suggest that chemokine receptors are in-
volved in communication between neurons and glia (Dorf
0165-5728/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0165 -5728 (01 )00457 -X
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-508-624-8074; fax: +1-508-624-8181.
E-mail address: [email protected]
(S.V. Westmoreland).
www.elsevier.com/locate/jneuroim
Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158
et al., 2000; Giovannelli et al., 1998; Janabi et al., 1999;
Ohtani et al., 1998), CNS development (Ma et al., 1998; Zou
et al., 1998), and neuronal survival (Araujo and Cotman,
1993; Giovannelli et al., 1998; Meucci et al., 1998). There
are also reports indicating that chemokine receptors mediate
pathologic processes in the cells of the CNS (Adamson et al.,
1996; Adle-Biassette et al., 1995; Gelbard et al., 1995; Kaul
and Lipton, 1999; Krajewski et al., 1997; Meucci et al.,
1998; Ohagen et al., 1999; Zheng et al., 1999). In light of the
growing interest in understanding determinants of neuronal
and glial function and dysfunction, particularly pertinent to
Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and AIDS dementia, it is critically
important to understand the roles that chemokine receptors
have in neuronal and glial communication, survival, and
injury. With this endeavor in mind, we document detailed
information of cellular, regional, and temporal CCR5 and
CXCR4 expression in the CNS of fetal, neonatal, and adult
rhesus macaques.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Tissue collection and processing
Brain was collected for immunohistochemistry and
immunofluorescence from 14 animals including 1 fetus, 12
neonates, and 1 adult. The fetus, obtained by caesarian
section, was at gestational day 100, which corresponds to
the second trimester of gestation (full term is 165 ± 5 days).
Neonates were sacrificed at 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 50 days, as
well as 6 and 9 months of age (roughly equivalent to a 3- to
4-year-old child). Brain tissue from one adult rhesus mac-
aque (greater than 4 years) was also examined. These gesta-
tional and perinatal time points were selected because most
HIV infections in children occur by vertical transmission
during parturition or immediately postpartum (Ammann,
1994; Belman, 1994; Wilfert et al., 1994). The animals used
in this paper were control animals for other studies.
At necropsy, body and organ weights were recorded and
tissues were collected within 1 h of death. A complete set of
brain tissues, including frontal and temporal cortex, hippo-
campus, thalamus, cerebellum, and brain stem, was col-
lected and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin,
embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 6 mm and stained with
hematoxylin and eosin by routine techniques within 2 weeks
of necropsy. Adjacent tissue blocks from the same regions
were collected and snap-frozen in microcentrifuge tubes and
stored at � 80 �C for nucleic acid isolation.
Fresh brain tissue from two additional second-trimester
fetuses derived by caesarian section and three adult rhesus
macaques was also harvested for flow cytometry (see
below). Animals were housed in accordance with standards
of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of
Laboratory Animal Care. Investigators adhered to the Guide
for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the
National Research Council.
2.2. Immunohistochemistry
To evaluate regional distribution and cellular expression
of CCR5 and CXCR4 in normal brain tissue, immunohis-
tochemistry using an avidin–biotin–horseradish-peroxidase
complex (ABC) technique was performed as described with
minor modifications (Westmoreland et al., 1998). Briefly, 6-
mm-thick sections of paraffin-embedded tissue from the
brain regions listed above were baked, deparaffinized,
rehydrated, blocked with a methanolic block (methanol,
H2O2, PBS) for 5 min, and treated with Proteinase K (Dako,
Carpinteria, CA) for 5 min. Slides were incubated with
monoclonal primary antibodies for CCR5 (5C7 used at 10
mg/ml; LeukoSite, Cambridge, MA) or CXCR4 (12G5a used
at 10 mg/ml; PharMingen, San Diego, CA), followed by a
biotinylated secondary antibody (horse–antimouse–biotin),
and then horseradish-peroxidase avidin–biotin complexes
(Vectastain Elite; Vector, Burlingame, CA). Labeling was
detected with the chromogen diaminobenzidine (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) and slides were lightly counterstained with
Mayer’s hematoxylin. Controls consisted of adjacent sec-
tions stained with isotype- and concentration-matched irrel-
evant antibodies.
2.3. Image analysis and quantification of neuronal chemo-
kine receptors
Immunohistochemical labeling was evaluated by manual
scoring and computerized image analysis as described pre-
viously (Sasseville et al., 1996; Veazey et al., 1998; Wykrzy-
kowska et al., 1998). Briefly, for manual scoring the intensity
(minimal, moderate, or marked) and percentage (0–25%,
26–50%, 51–75%,>75%) of positive cells within each brain
region and within the six neocortical layers were examined
(Adams and Graham, 1994). For image analysis we used an
Olympus Vanox-S research microscope interfaced to a Quan-
timet 500IW image analyzer (Leica, Cambridge, UK) via an
Optronics DEI 750 CCD camera (Goleta, CA) and focused on
the frontal cortex. Eight separate regions of equal area (5000
mm2) from the frontal cortex of each case were analyzed. The
total number of immunopositive cells in each region was
counted automatically according to a contrast threshold that
would detect cells stained with diaminobenzidine.
2.4. Data analysis
Data were compiled for each animal by averaging the
total number of CCR5 or CXCR4 immunopositive cells for
all eight regions analyzed for each case. The data were
expressed as the number of immunopositive cells/5000 mm2.
Standard deviation was assessed for each time point and
added to each graph using Excel 5.0 (Microsoft, Redmond,
WA). One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to
determine the relationship between the age of monkeys and
the expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 (Rosner, 1990). When
the result of one-way ANOVAwas significant the difference
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158 147
between individual age groups was determined by the Least
Significant Difference analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was
considered significant for one-way ANOVA.
2.5. Confocal microscopy for CCR5 and CXCR4
To examine the cellular expression pattern of CCR5 and
CXCR4 in neurons and to determine the degree of coex-
pression of the two chemokine receptors in neurons in
animals of varying maturity, we performed double- and
triple-label immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
using previously described techniques (Klein et al., 1999;
Williams et al., 2001). Briefly, slides from paraffin-embed-
ded tissues were treated as described above for immunohis-
tochemistry and then incubated overnight in the dark at 4 �Cwith monoclonal antibody to CXCR4 (12G5a; 10 mg/ml;
PharMingen). Slides were washed twice in 1X phosphate-
buffered saline with 0.2% fish skin gelatin (PBS-FSG) with
0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma). Slides were then incubated
with a rabbit anti-mouse ‘‘bridge’’ (1:100; Vector) for 30
min at room temperature, washed, and incubated with a goat
anti-rabbit Alexa 488 fluorochrome (1:1000; Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 min at room temperature. Slides
were washed, treated with an avidin–biotin block (Dako)
for 10 min followed by 10% normal mouse serum for 30
min. The second primary antibody, biotinylated CCR5-5C7
(10 mg/ml), was incubated for 1 h at room temperature.
Slides were washed and incubated with streptavidin Alexa
568 fluorochrome (1:1000; Molecular Probes) for 30 min at
room temperature. Slides were washed and treated with 50
mM Cu3SO4 in ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) for 45
min to quench autofluorescence (Schnell et al., 1999), rinsed
in dH2O, and coverslipped with anti-quenching aqueous
mounting solution (Mowiol 4–88 glycerol DABCO, TRIS
pH 8.5) (Harlow and Lane).
To confirm the neuronal phenotype of analyzed cells,
selected tissues were also incubated with a monoclonal anti-
body to microtubule associated-protein-2 (MAP-2), a neu-
ron-specific marker. In these studies the sections were first
labeled with anti-MAP-2 (1:500; Sigma) and goat anti-mouse
Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes), blocked with 1% normal
mouse serum (Sigma), incubated with a biotinylated-anti-
CCR5 (as above) followed by streptavidin Alexa 568, and
lastly with CXCR4 conjugated to Cychrome (PharMingen).
Slides were examined using a Leica TCS SP laser scan-
ning confocal microscope equipped with three lasers (Leica
Microsystems, Exton, PA) using Leica software. Images
were collected at 512� 512 pixel resolution. The stained
cells were optically sectioned in the z-axis, and the images in
the different channels (photomultiplier tubes) were collected
simultaneously after compensating for bleed-through in
different channels. The step size in the z-axis varied from
0.2 to 0.5 mm to obtain 30–50 optical sections per field. The
images were transferred to a Macintosh G4 computer, and
NIH image 1.6 and Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems, Moun-
tain View, CA) were used to assemble the images.
2.6. Analysis of chemokine receptor expression by flow
cytometry
In addition to examining chemokine receptor expression
in tissues, we examined chemokine receptor expression in
neurons from three fetal brains and immediately ex vivo glia
isolated from three adult brains. The protocol for isolation of
neurons from fetal rhesus brain has been previously pub-
lished (Klein et al., 1999). Briefly, fetal brain was harvested
immediately after caesarian section. The cortex was disso-
ciated mechanically with sterile scalpel blades, washed in
sterile PBS, and centrifuged at 800 rpm for 10 min. The
pellet was then enzymatically dissociated with trypsin
(0.05%) in the presence of DNase (50 mg/ml) for 20 min at
37 �C. Dissociated cells were washed with PBS, passed
through a 150-mm nylon mesh, washed, pelleted again, and
resuspended in tissue culture medium consisting of DMEM
supplemented with gentamycin (20 mg/ml), 0.01% dextrose,
and 5% FBS at a concentration of 3� 106 cells per ml. Cells
were seeded in T75 flasks for 1 day. Non-adherent neurons
were gently washed of the adherent glial cells and analyzed
by flow cytometry at 106 cells/ml for chemokine receptor
expression. As previously described (Klein et al., 1999),
neurons were incubated with monoclonal antibodies to either
biotinylated CCR5 (clone 5C7; LeukoSite) or CXCR4-PE
(clone 12G5a; PharMingen). All samples were incubated in
the dark at 4 �C for 30 min and then washed in PBS. Cells
were then resuspended and fixed in 2.5 ml RPMI 5% FCS
and 2% paraformaldehyde. Samples were analyzed on a
Becton Dickinson FACS Calibur using Cell Quest software.
Glia were isolated from adult rhesus brain obtained
within 30 min of necropsy using a previously described
procedure (Yong et al., 1992). Meninges were removed and
tissues were mechanically dissociated using sterile scalpel
blades. Dissociated tissues were washed three times in PBS
by centrifugation at 800 rpm for 10 min and enzymatically
dissociated with 0.25% trypsin in the presence of DNase (50
mg/ml) at 37 �C for 45 min. Dissociated cells were washed
twice with PBS and subjected to a 30% isotonic percol
linear gradient at 15,000 rpm for 30 min to separate myelin
from glial cell bodies. Recovered cells were washed twice
with PBS and adjusted to a concentration of 1�106 cells
per ml per data point. Cells were incubated for 30 min on ice
in PBS blocking buffer containing 10% goat serum, 5%
fetal calf serum, and 1% human serum, washed, and
incubated with biotinylated anti-CCR5 or anti-CXCR4 for
30 min on ice. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated
with streptavidin PE (for CCR5) or goat-anti-mouse PE (for
CXCR4) for 30 min on ice. Cells were then washed and
fixed for 15 min on ice with 2% paraformaldehyde. The
cells were made permeable by incubating for 15 min with
0.1% saponin. Cells were spun down and incubated with
CD11b� FITC (10 mg/ml; Immunotech, Westbrook, ME)
for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed with PBS, and
resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde for analysis by flow
cytometry using a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson, Moun-
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158148
tain View, CA). At least 10,000 events were collected per
sample. Cells were analyzed according to CD11b positivity.
Chemokine receptor expression on CD11b+ macrophage/
microglia and CD11b� astrocytes and oligodendrocytes
was quantitated.
2.7. Reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-
PCR) for detection of CCR5 and CXCR4 mRNA stand-
ardized to rhesus beta-globin
Total RNA was isolated from blocks of frozen frontal
cortex gray matter, adjacent to those used for immunohis-
tochemistry, using the RNEasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia,
CA) from all animals except the fetuses. Reverse transcrip-
tion (RT) was performed on 3 mg of RNA using the
GeneAmp RNA PCR Kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CT)
according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, conditions
for RT reactions consisted of 10 min at 15 �C, 1 h at 42 �C,and 5 min at 99 �C. PCR was performed on 15 mg of newly
transcribed cDNA using 20 pmol of CXCR4 primers (s-50-
ATA-TAC-ACT-TCA-GAT-AAC-TAC-ACC-30 and as-50-
CAT-AGG-AAG-TTC-CCA-AAG-TAC-C-30) to produce a
311 bp product, CCR5 primers (s-50-GCT-CTA-CTC-ACT-
GGT-GTT-CAT-C-30 and as-50-TCA-TGA-TGG-TGA-
AGA-TAA-GCC-3) to produce a 620-bp product or Beta-
globin primers 50-CTT GGG AGT GAA GAA ACT GC and
30-TAG CCT CAG ACT CTG TTT GG. cDNA was dena-
tured for 2 min at 92 �C, then amplified within a linear range
for 35 cycles at 92 �C for 30 s, 61 �C for 30 s, and 72 �C for
30 s, followed by an extension time of 10 min at 72 �C.Amplification was performed in a Perkin-Elmer 9700 ther-
mocycler with 100 mM of deoxynucleoside triphosphates,
1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5 IU of taq DNA polymerase and buffer
(50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 9.0) in a 50-ml reaction. Eightmicroliters of amplified PCR reaction products with 2 ml ofgel loading buffer were electrophoresed through 2% agarose
gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV
light. Appropriate controls for contamination during PCR
were negative. Images were captured with densitometry
assayed using the Gel-Doc 2000 system with Quantity One
software (Bio Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The density
of the CCR5 and CXCR4 bands were standardized to the
density of amplified rhesus beta-globin from each of the
samples. Values for CCR5 and CXCR4 mRNA were ex-
pressed as the ratio of signal obtained for chemokine recep-
tors relative to rhesus beta-globin signals and graphed using
Excel 98 (Microsoft).
3. Results
3.1. Expression pattern of CCR5 in the brain of rhesus
macaques
We used immunohistochemistry to examine CCR5
expression in resident cells of the cortex, hippocampus,
thalamus, cerebellum, and brain stem from rhesus macaques
ranging from the third trimester of gestation to adult. We
evaluated the results by individual manual scoring based on
frequency and intensity of immunopositive cells. Manual
scoring of the frontal cortex included evaluation of each of
the six neocortical neuronal layers.
Expression of CCR5 was present in all animals and
increased with age. In a third-trimester fetus, scattered
cortical neurons were weakly immunopositive for CCR5
while numerous neurons of the subcortical nuclei expressed
moderate-to-marked amounts of CCR5 in the cytoplasm of
the perikaryon and processes (Fig. 1A). In addition, there
was strong vessel-associated immunopositivity for CCR5 in
fetal brain (Fig. 1B), which was still detectable after 50 days
of age (Fig. 1E). At birth, there was minimal CCR5
expression in most of the pyramidal neurons of the cortex,
hippocampus (CA1–4), and the granular neurons of the
dentate gyrus. Purkinje cells expressed abundant cytoplas-
mic CCR5 in a granular or vesicular pattern (Fig. 1C) while
neurons within the granular layer had modest CCR5. Epen-
dymal and choroid plexus cells were uniformly CCR5
immunopositive. Occasional CCR5 cells within periventric-
ular and perivascular collections of germinal matrix cells
were also CCR5 positive.
Between 3 and 14 days of age, expression of CCR5
increased in neocortical neurons in all layers. In addition,
moderate or marked expression was present in greater than
75% of CA1–4 pyramidal hippocampal and dentate gyrus
neurons. CCR5 expression was also marked in brain stem
neurons by 3 days of age (Fig. 1D). CCR5 expression in glia
within the cortical white matter was not detectable until 21
days of age, but remained detectable thereafter (Fig. 1E,
inset). CCR5 was expressed within the cytoplasm of the
glial cell bodies as well as in the processes.
By 50 days of age, CCR5 expression in cortical neurons
was comparable to adult levels (Figs. 1E and 2). Also, CCR5
expression in cortical neurons emerged as a bimodal or
differential expression pattern where large pyramidal neo-
cortical neurons expressed much higher levels of CCR5 than
did neighboring neurons (Figs. 1E, arrows; 2). This pattern
was first evident in neocortical layer V where a subpopula-
tion of large pyramidal neurons (25–50% of neurons in that
layer) exhibited marked cytoplasmic expression of CCR5
while a population of smaller neurons (50–75% of layer V
neurons) expressed only minimal CCR5. This bimodal
expression pattern was more prominent in the 6-month-old
animal and included neocortical layers III and V, reached
adult proportions by 9 months of age in layers III, V, and VI
(Fig. 2), and persisted in adults.
3.2. Expression pattern of CXCR4 in the brain of rhesus
macaques
Expression of CXCR4 in the CNS was similar to that of
CCR5 with some exceptions. Fetal expression of CXCR4
was slightly greater than that seen for CCR5 with moderate
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158 149
expression in neocortical neurons, but less intense expres-
sion in the thalamic neurons and neurons of subcortical
nuclei. Also, CXCR4 was generally less intense than CCR5
in the neocortical neurons after birth (Fig. 2). Cortical
neuronal expression was low until 14 days of age when it
increased (Fig. 2). Similar to CCR5, CXCR4 expression in
neocortical neurons increased with age and also evolved
into a subtle bimodal expression pattern, but the degree of
differential expression of CXCR4 was much less prominent
than that seen with CCR5 (Fig. 2). CXCR4 was detectable
in 50–75% of hippocampal pyramidal neurons in regions
CA1–4 and in over 75% of granular neurons of the dentate
gyrus by 3 days of age, similar to CCR5 (Fig. 1F). CXCR4
expression in glial cells in the cortical white matter was
minimal, but detectable as early as 3 days of age. Glial ex-
pression increased slightly after 21 days of age and re-
mained detectable into adulthood. Unlike CCR5, CXCR4
glial expression was limited to the cytoplasm of the cell
body and did not include glial processes.
Minimal vessel-associated CXCR4 expression was ob-
served compared to the intense expression of CCR5. Al-
though vessel-associated CXCR4 was detected in the fetus,
by 14 days of age vessel-associated expression of CXCR4
was undetectable by immunohistochemistry, whereas ves-
sel-associated CCR5 expression persisted (Fig. 1E, arrow-
heads).
Fig. 1. A–F: Immunohistochemistry for CCR5 (A–E) and CXCR4 (F) expression in rhesus fetal and neonatal brain. There is abundant CCR5 expression in
subcortical nuclei (A) and associated with cortical vessel in fetal brain (B), the perikaryon of Purkinje cells in day 1 neonate (C), brain stem neurons in 3-
day-old neonate (D), and in the perikaryon and processes of neurons in frontal cortex layer III in a 50-day-old rhesus (E). Arrows highlight two
neighboring neurons with differential expression of CCR5. Vessel-associated CCR5 expression indicated by arrowheads. CCR5 glial expression in cortical
white matter demonstrated in inset. CXCR4 is expressed in hippocampus and dentate gyrus of 3-day-old rhesus macaque (F). Avidin–biotin horseradish
peroxidase technique with diaminobenzidine chromogen and Mayers hematoxylin counterstain. Original magnification, � 60 (A, B, E inset), � 40 (C, E,
F), � 20 (F).
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158150
Fig. 2. A–H: Comparison of CCR5 and CXCR4 expression by immunohistochemistry in frontal cortical neurons in rhesus neonates over time: CCR5 expression in neonates at birth (A), 14 days (B), 50 days (C),
and 9 months of age (D); CXCR4 expression in neonates at birth (E), 14 days (F), 50 days (G), and 9 months of age (H). Note the significant increase in staining intensity over time. This change is more
pronounced for CCR5 than CXCR4. Avidin–biotin–horseradish peroxidase complex technique with diaminobenzidine chromogen and Mayer’s hematoxylin counterstain. Original magnification, � 20.
S.V.Westm
orela
ndet
al./JournalofNeuroimmunology122(2002)146–158
151
3.3. CCR5 and CXCR4 neuronal expression increases with
age
Because there appeared to be an increase in the neuronal
expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 with age, we used manual
scoring (Fig. 2; data incorporated in text) and digital image
analysis (Fig. 3) to quantify the change. Based on these data,
the number of CCR5 and CXCR4 immunopositive neurons
in the frontal cortex increased four- to five-fold between birth
and 9 months of age (Figs. 2 and 3). This age-dependent
increase in CCR5 and CXCR4 expression by cortical neu-
rons was statistically significant ( p < 0.00001) from birth to
9 months of age. The most dramatic increase in expression
occurred in cortical layers III, V, and VI in pyramidal
neurons.
At birth, CCR5 was expressed at minimal levels in
neurons in all six neocortical layers with slightly higher
levels of expression in the pyramidal neurons of layer III
(Fig. 2A). By 14 days of age, CCR5 immunoreactivity in
the frontal cortex increased significantly compared to day 0
based on Least Significant Difference (LSD) analysis (Figs.
2B and 3A). Around 50% to 75% of neurons in neocortical
layers III, V, and VI were strongly immunopositive for
CCR5 (Fig. 2). In the 50-day-old animal, CCR5 expression
in cortical neurons again increased significantly by LSD
analysis in layers III, V, and VI compared to the 14-day-old
animal (Figs. 2C and 3A). Expression of CCR5 increased
again in cortical neurons in the 9-month-old animal (Fig.
2D), but the difference from the 50-day-old animal was not
statistically significant (Fig. 3A).
At birth, CXCR4 expression was minimal in only 10–
20% of neocortical neurons limited to layer III (Fig. 2E). By
14 days of age, moderate-to-marked CXCR4 expression
was detectable in 50% to 75% of the neurons in neocortical
layers III and V (Fig. 2F). The increase in cortical neuronal
expression between days 0 and 14 was statistically signifi-
cant ( p < 0.00001) (Fig. 3B). By 50 days of age, CXCR4
immunoreactivity in neurons increased, particularly in pyr-
amidal neurons of neocortical layers III, V, and VI (Fig. 2G).
CXCR4 neuronal immunoreactivity increased, but not sig-
nificantly (Fig. 3B), between 21 days and 9 months of age.
The expression of CXCR4 increased to moderate or marked
expression in up to 75% of neurons in all neocortical layers
in a 9-month-old juvenile (Fig. 2H). Although expression of
CCR5 was significantly increased through 50 days of age
(Fig. 3A), the expression of CXCR4 did not change sig-
nificantly after 21 days of age (Fig. 3B).
3.4. Most cortical neurons that express CCR5 are also
CXCR4 positive
To determine if CCR5 and CXCR4 were expressed in the
same cells, double-label confocal microscopy was per-
formed. At birth we found that 60–70% of neurons coex-
pressed CCR5 and CXCR4 (Fig. 4A). The remaining
neurons were strongly positive only for CCR5 (Fig. 4A,
arrowhead). No neurons were positive for CXCR4 alone.
Most labeling for CCR5 and CXCR4 in neurons was
localized within the perikaryon in a vesicular or granular
pattern and extended into the dendritic processes and axon.
There was also strong vessel-associated CCR5 immunopo-
Fig. 3. A, B: Box plots of immunopositive cells for CCR5 (A) and CXCR4
(B) per 5000 mm2 area in frontal cortex. Standard deviation and p values
were calculated and data were graphed as box plots using Excel 98 software
(Microsoft). Horizontal lines in box plots, generated with Statview software
(Abacus, Berkeley, CA), represent (bottom to top) lowest, first quartile,
median, third quartile, and highest number of immunopositive cells/5000
mm2 area. NS = not significant.
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158152
Fig. 4. A–E: Confocal microscopy images in panels A–D are double-label immunofluorescence of CCR5 and CXCR4 in the frontal cortex in a newborn (A),
6-month-old juvenile (B), and 5-year-old adult rhesus macaque (C, D). In panels A–D, images for the individual channels are shown on the left side of the
larger composite panel as insets of CXCR4 (green), CCR5 (red), and either differential interference contrast (DIC) or the nuclear stain ToPro3 (blue). The
composite panels represent superimposition of individual channels with colocalization of CCR5 and CXCR4 appearing yellow. Panel A illustrates a subclass of
CCR5-single positive neurons (arrowhead) and vessel-associated CCR5 (arrow) in a newborn rhesus macaque. Panel B shows a subpopulation of neurons that
have more intense expression of CCR5 than CXCR4 and thus appear red-orange in a 6-month-old animal. Panel C represents coexpression of CCR5 and
CXCR4 by the majority of cortical neurons. Panel D is a similar neuron at higher magnification demonstrating colocalization of CCR5 and CXCR4 at and
below the cellular membrane and within the cytoplasm. Panel E is a triple-label immunofluorescence image of MAP-2 (neuron-specific microtubule associated
protein–2; green) positive neurons from an adult rhesus macaque colabeled with CCR5 (red) and CXCR4 (blue) to verify cells as neurons. White bar at the
bottom of each image represents 10 mm.
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158 153
sitivity (Fig. 4A, arrow). In animals 3 days of age or older,
most neurons were double positive for CCR5 and CXCR4,
although 15–30% expressed more intense CCR5 than
CXCR4. In animals 6 months of age or older, the population
of CCR5 single-positive cortical neurons was no longer
evident (Fig. 4B,C). However, some pyramidal cortical
neurons did express a relatively higher level of CCR5 (Fig.
4B, arrows; C). In these CCR5, CXCR4 double-positive
neurons, the two chemokine receptors were often present on
or just below the plasma membrane and within the cytoplasm
in a vesicular pattern (Fig. 4D).
To confirm that the CCR5 and CXCR4 positive cells
were neurons, triple-label immunofluorescence with the
neuron marker microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2)
was performed on adult frontal cortex (Fig. 4E).
3.5. CCR5 and CXCR4 are present on the cell surface of
neurons and glia
To determine the percentage of neurons that express
CCR5 and CXCR4 on their surface, we used flow cytometry
to analyze neurons isolated from three second-trimester
fetuses using techniques described previously (Klein et al.,
1999). These data demonstrate CCR5 expression on the
plasma membrane of 34–47% of rhesus fetal neurons (Fig.
5A) and CXCR4 on 28–51% of the cells. Since viable
neurons cannot be isolated from juvenile or adult brain, we
were unable to directly compare neuronal surface chemo-
kine receptor expression between fetuses and adults. How-
ever, the analysis confirms that CCR5 and CXCR4 are
expressed on the surface of subsets of fetal rhesus macaque
neurons in addition to being expressed in the cytoplasm and
suggests that there may be considerable variation of
between individuals.
In addition to characterizing the expression of chemokine
receptors on neurons, we have further characterized glial
cell expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 (Klein et al., 1999;
Westmoreland et al., 1998). CXCR4 expression in glial cells
in the cortical white matter was minimal, but was detectable
as early as 3 days of age, and increased slightly after 21 days
of age and remained detectable into adulthood. CCR5
expression in glia within the cortical white matter was not
detectable until 21 days of age, and remained detectable
thereafter (Fig. 1E, inset). CCR5 was expressed within the
cytoplasm of the glial cell bodies and the processes.
To better define and quantitate the surface expression of
CCR5 and CXCR4 on glial cells, we used flow cytometry to
examine chemokine receptor expression in different types of
glia (CD11b+ microglia/macrophages and CD11b� astro-
cytes and oligodendrocytes) isolated immediately ex vivo
from brain of three adult rhesus macaques. Flow cytometric
analysis of dissociated glial cells double-stained with CD11b
Fig. 5. A–C: Flow cytometric analysis of surface expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 on fetal neurons and adult glial cells. Percentage of CCR5 and CXCR4
surface expression on neurons cultured from fetal rhesus macaque demonstrated by flow cytometry (A); percentage of analyzed cells expressing CCR5 and
CXCR4 on sorted CD11b+ microglia and CD11b� astrocytes/oligodendrocytes harvested immediately ex vivo from normal adult macaque brain (B);
Histograms of original flow data summarized in table 5B (C).
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158154
and CCR5 or CXCR4 (Fig. 5B,C) revealed that the number
of CD11b+ microglia that express CCR5 or CXCR4 is
roughly comparable to the number of astrocytes and oligo-
dendrocytes combined indicating that microglia are the
predominant glial cell population expressing CCR5 and
CXCR4. In addition, the number of CD11b+ microglia and
CD11b� astrocytes/oligodendrocytes expressing CXCR4
on their surface is higher than those expressing CCR5
(summarized in Fig. 5B). On average, close to 50% of
CD11b+ microglia express CXCR4 on their surface, while
only an average of 12–13% express CCR5. CXCR4 also has
higher surface expression on CD11b� astrocytes and oli-
godendrocytes averaging 46% of the sorted cells compared
to 4–5% expressing CCR5 in all three animals analyzed. In
general, CD11b+ and CD11b� glial cells together express
more CXCR4 than CCR5.
3.6. CCR5 and CXCR4 mRNA expression in frontal cortex
evaluated by RT-PCR
To confirm the specificity of the CCR5 and CXCR4
immunohistochemistry, we analyzed mRNA from frozen
tissue adjacent to the section of frontal cortex for the
presence of CCR5 and CXCR4 specific mRNA. RT-PCR
was performed on total RNA and we compared mRNA
levels by age of the animal relative to the expression of
rhesus beta-globin mRNA. Although numerous cell types
are present in the gray matter analyzed, most of the cells
expressing chemokine receptors based on immunohisto-
chemistry and immunofluorescence in the cortical gray
matter are neurons. CXCR4 mRNA detected by RT-PCR
had the highest signal in newborns and decreased with age
(Fig. 6A,B). Likewise, the strongest RT-PCR signal of
CCR5 mRNA was from newborns (Fig. 6A,C). Since RT-
PCR has limited usefulness in quantitative analysis, we are
developing in situ hybridization to further explore the
relative changes in CCR5 and CXCR4 protein and RNA
levels.
4. Discussion
We have demonstrated previously that the chemokine
receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, which also function as cor-
eceptors for HIV/SIV, are present and functional on resident
CNS cells, including neurons and glia in normal and SIV-
infected adult rhesus macaques (Klein et al., 1999; West-
moreland et al., 1998). In this study, we have further
characterized the expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 individ-
ually and together in rhesus on neurons and glia relative to
age of the animal. The earliest sites of expression of these
chemokine receptors were the hippocampal CA1–4 neu-
rons, Purkinje cells, subcortical nuclei, and the pyramidal
neurons of neocortical layer III. The observation that neuro-
nal expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 in the cortex increased
significantly with age is of considerable interest. In addition,
these two chemokine receptors were commonly coexpressed
in neurons at the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm of the
perikaryon and processes with the intensity of CCR5
expression often greater than that of CXCR4. In contrast,
CCR5 expression in glia was often less intense and was
expressed on the surface of fewer cells than CXCR4. In
addition, microglia are the predominant glial cell type that
expressed CCR5 and CXCR4. Overall, the cellular expres-
sion of the important HIV/SIV coreceptors, CCR5 and
CXCR4 is complex and varies by cell type, brain region,
and age.
CCR5 and CXCR4 expression increased significantly
( p < 0.05) with age from birth to 9 months. Expression of
both CCR5 and CXCR4 was widespread in neurons of all
neocortical layers, but was most prominent in the pyrami-
dal neurons of layers III, V, and VI. By 50 days of age,
CCR5 was also notably bimodal in neurons of those layers
Fig. 6. A–C: CCR5 and CXCR4 mRNA detected by RT-PCR (A) of 3 mgtotal RNA isolated from adult rhesus macaque frontal gray matter.
Amplified products were visualized on a 2% ethidium-bromide impreg-
nated agarose gel: CXCR4 (top), CCR5 (middle), and beta-globin (bottom).
Graphs of CXCR4 (B) and CCR5 (C) RT-PCR products representative of
mRNA levels normalized to rhesus beta-globin mRNA determined by
densitometry and Excel 98 (Microsoft).
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158 155
where large pyramidal neurons expressed higher levels of
CCR5 than did neighboring neurons. CCR5 expression in-
creased significantly up to 50 days of age, whereas CXCR4
had a slower rate of increase after 21 days. Although there
was a distinguishable subpopulation of neurons that was
strongly CCR5-single positive early in development, most
neurons were double-positive for CCR5 and CXCR4. The
differential expression pattern of CCR5 and CXCR4 docu-
mented here in rhesus neurons suggests a possible deter-
minant of selective vulnerability of subpopulations of neu-
rons reported in humans infected with HIV (Petito et al.,
1999).
Although CCR5 and CXCR4 protein increased in the
neocortex with age, mRNA decreased or was variable over
time and did not parallel protein levels. A similar lack of
correlation between mRNA and protein levels has been
observed for a variety of proteins in other experimental
systems and the reasons are not always clear (Fields, 2001;
Gygi SP, 1999). In this instance, the low CXCR4 mRNA
and high protein seen in older neonates and adults may
represent increasing protein stability with age. In addition,
chemokine receptors may recycle to the neuronal surface, as
has been demonstrated in leukocytes (Feniger-Barish et al.,
1999) and endothelium (Andjelkovic and Pachter, 2000)
allowing for high protein expression without significant de
novo protein synthesis. The higher CXCR4 and CCR5
mRNA expression in newborns and young neonates coin-
cident with lower protein expression may also reflect higher
mRNA stability.
A recent publication described limited-to-no expression
of CXCR4 in human children younger than 3.5 and 4.5
years of age, roughly equivalent to 3 to 4 months of age in a
rhesus. Our study suggests that expression in the rhesus
begins earlier and increases more rapidly than that seen in
human infants and children. Although there is some dis-
crepancy between the two studies as to the age of onset of
expression of CCR5 and CXCR4, both studies show that
expression of these two important chemokine receptors
increases with age in infancy and in young juveniles. In
addition to possible species differences between humans and
rhesus in the onset of expression of neuronal chemokine
receptors, particularly CXCR4, explanation of the discrep-
ancy in results may relate to rapid isolation and embedding
of rhesus tissue in experimental settings.
The dynamic expression pattern of these two G-protein-
coupled chemokine receptors suggests that these receptors
potentially have multiple complex functions, many of which
are still unknown. Growing evidence suggests that these
receptors and their chemokines are involved in multiple
functions in neural cells, including cellular communication,
CNS development, and neuronal survival, injury, and death.
One of the first proposed functions is to facilitate commu-
nication between glial cells and neurons in the CNS.
Astrocytes have been shown to produce chemokine ligands,
such as SDF-1a, GROa2, and fractalkine, that bind chemo-
kine receptors found on neurons (Giovannelli et al., 1998;
Janabi et al., 1999; Ohtani et al., 1998). Another role of
chemokines and their receptors in the brain is to promote
normal CNS development. CXCR4 has been shown to be
important in cerebellar development in mice (Ma et al.,
1998; Zou et al., 1998). A third function of chemokine
receptors is to promote neuronal survival, demonstrated by
the effects of GROa2 (Giovannelli et al., 1998), fractalkine
(Giovannelli et al., 1998; Meucci et al., 1998), and IL-8
(Araujo and Cotman, 1993) on different neuronal popula-
tions. Conversely, chemokines and chemokine receptors on
neurons can also mediate neuronal injury and death. Apop-
tosis of cultured neurons can be induced by SDF-1amediated through CXCR4 (Kaul and Lipton, 1999; Zheng
et al., 1999). Also, human fetal neurons treated with super-
natant from HIV-1-infected monocyte-derived macrophages
demonstrate signs of stress, injury, and apoptosis partially
mediated through CXCR4 (Zheng et al., 1999). In addition,
recombinant HIV-1IIIB gp120 and SIVmac251 gp120 induce
apoptosis in rat fetal neurons mediated through CXCR4,
which is blocked with pretreatment of neurons with SDF-1a(Meucci et al., 1998).
In conclusion, data presented here demonstrate early
onset and rapid increase in neuronal CCR5 and CXCR4 in
the rhesus fetus, neonate, and juvenile which reaches adult
levels by 9 months of age, roughly comparable to 9 years of
age in a human child. In addition, there are complex differ-
ences in neuronal CCR5 and CXCR4 expression with
regard to brain region and subpopulation of neurons in the
rhesus that have been similarly suggested in human brain
(Horuk et al., 1997). This complex and differential expres-
sion pattern of chemokine receptors may contribute to the
selective vulnerability of subpopulations of neurons ob-
served in HIV neuropathogenesis (Masliah et al., 1992b).
Lastly, although CCR5 and CXCR4 proteins increase with
age in the rhesus, this does not occur solely due to a parallel
increase in mRNA. This suggests that there are additional
control mechanisms of chemokine receptor expression, such
as post-translational modifications and/or recycling of
receptors which have been previously documented (Vila-
Coro et al., 1999).
Given the emerging significance of chemokine receptors
in neuronal and glial communication, function, and survival,
this class of receptors warrants further study. In addition,
CCR5 and CXCR4 have been implicated as potential
mediators of direct neuronal injury by HIV and SIV viral
proteins, like gp120, or of indirect neuronal injury through
chemokines. Theoretically, aberrant or excessive activation
of these abundant neuronal receptors by either of these
‘‘ligands’’ may disrupt normal physiologic signals or initiate
inappropriate signals that could contribute to neuronal
dysfunction and loss (death) in AIDS. Since neuronal
CCR5 and CXCR4 expression increases with maturation
of the rhesus infant, and similarly the human child, it is
likely that the potential for damage to neurons from SIV- or
HIV-induced chemokines, cytokines, or viral proteins medi-
ated through chemokine receptors could increase with age.
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158156
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Prabhat Sehgal and Angela Carville and the
rest of the clinical staff for excellent care of neonatal animals
used in this study. We also thank Liz Curran, and the
pathology technicians for assistance with tissue harvesting
and record keeping, Bill Kennedy and Dan Shvetz for
technical support, Kristen Toohey for exceptional photo-
graphic and graphics assistance, and Doug Pauley for edito-
rial review.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants
NS30769, NS37654, NS40237, MH61192, RR00168, and
RR00150. A. Lackner is a recipient of an Elizabeth Glaser
Scientist Award.
References
Adams, J.H., Graham, D.I., 1994. An Introduction to Neuropathology.
Livingstone, Edinburgh.
Adamson, D.C., Wildemann, B., Sasaki, M., Glass, J.D., McArthur, J.C.,
Christov, V.I., Dawson, T.M., Dawson, V.L., 1996. Immunologic NO
synthase: elevation in severe AIDS dementia and induction by HIV-1
gp41. Science 274, 1917–1921.
Adle-Biassette, H., Levy, Y., Colombel, M., Poron, F., Natchev, S., Keo-
hane, C., Gray, F., 1995. Neuronal apoptosis in HIV infection in adults.
Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 21, 218–227.
Ammann, A.J., 1994. Human immunodeficiency virus infection/AIDS in
children: the next decade. Pediatrics 93, 930–935.
Andjelkovic, A.V., Pachter, J.S., 2000. Characterization of binding sites for
chemokines MCP-1 and MIP-1alpha on human brain microvessels.
Neurochemistry 75, 1898–1906.
Araujo, D.M., Cotman, C.W., 1993. Trophic effects of interleukin-4, -7 and
-8 on hippocampal neuronal cultures: potential involvement of glial-
derived factor. Brain Res. 600, 49–55.
Asare, E., Dunn, G., Glass, J., McArthur, J., Luthert, P., Lantos, P., Everall, I.,
1996. Neuronal pattern correlates with the severity of human immunode-
ficiency virus-associated dementia complex—usefulness of spatial pat-
tern analysis in clinicopathological studies. Am. J. Pathol. 148, 31–38.
Belman, A.L., 1994. HIV-1-associated CNS disease in infants and children.
Res. Publ.-Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 72, 289–310.
Coughlan, C.M., McManus, C.M., Sharron, M., Gao, Z., Murphy, D.,
Jaffer, S., Choe, W., Chen, W., Hesselgesser, J., Gaylord, H., et al.,
2000. Expression of multiple functional chemokine receptors and
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human neurons. Neuroscience
97, 591–600.
Dorf, M.E., Berman, M.A., Tanabe, S., Heesen, M., Luo, Y., 2000. Astro-
cytes express functional chemokine receptors. Neuroimmunology 111,
109–121.
Epstein, L.G., Sharer, L.R., Oleske, J.M., Connor, E.M., Goudsmit, J.,
Bagdon, L., Robert-Guroff, M., Koenigsberger, M.R., 1986. Neurologic
manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus infection in children.
Pediatrics 78, 678–687.
Everall, I.P., Luthert, P.J., Lantos, P.L., 1991. Neuronal loss in the frontal
cortex in HIV infection. Lancet 337, 1119–1121.
Feniger-Barish, R., Ran, M., Zaslaver, A., Ben-Baruch, A., 1999. Differ-
ential modes of regulation of cxc chemokine-induced internalization
and recycling of human CXCR1 and CXCR2. Cytokine 11, 996–1009.
Fields, S., 2001. Proteomics in Genomeland. Science 291, 1221–1224.
Gelbard, H.A., James, H.J., Sharer, L.R., Perry, S.W., Saito, Y., Kazee, A.M.,
Blumberg, B.M., Epstein, L.G., 1995. Apoptotic neurons in brains from
pediatric patients with HIV-1 encephalitis and progressive encephalop-
athy. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 21, 208–217.
Giovannelli, A., Limatola, C., Ragozzino, D., Mileo, A., Ruggieri, A.,
Ciotti, M., Mercanti, D., Santoni, A., Eusebi, F., 1998. CXC chemo-
kines interleukin-8 (IL-8) and growth-related gene product alpha
(GROa) modulate Purkinje neuron activity in mouse cerebellum. J.
Neuroimmunol. 92, 122–132.
Gonzalez,R.G.,Cheng,L.L.,Westmoreland,S.V.,Sakaie,K.E.,Becerra,L.R.,
Lee, P.L., Masliah, E., Lackner, A.A., 2000. Early brain injury in the SIV-
macaque model of AIDS. AIDS 14, 2841–2849.
Gygi SP, R.Y., Franza, B.R., Aebersold, R., 1999. Correlation between
protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1720–
1730.
Halks-Miller, M., Hesselgesser, J., Miko, I.J., Horuk, R., 1997. Chemokine
receptors in developing human brain. Methods Enzymol. 288, 27–38.
Harlow, E., Lane, D. Antibodies. A laboratory manual.
Hesselgesser, J., Horuk, R., 1999. Chemokine and chemokine receptor
expression in the central nervous system. J. Neurovirol. 5, 13–26.
Horuk, R., Martin, A., Hesselgesser, J., Hadley, T., Lu, Z., Wang, Z.,
Pelper, S.C., 1996. The Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines: struc-
tural analysis and expression in the brain. J. Leukocyte Biol. 59, 29–
38.
Horuk, R., Martin, A.W., Wang, Z.-X., Schweitzer, L., Gerassimides, A.,
Guo, H., Lu, Z.-H., Hesselgesser, J., Perez, H.D., Kim, J., et al., 1997.
Expression of chemokine receptors by subsets of neurons in the central
nervous system. J. Immunol. 158, 2882–2890.
Janabi, N., Hau, I., Tardieu, M., 1999. Negative feedback between prosta-
glandin and alpha- and beta-chemokine synthesis in human microglial
cells and astrocytes. J. Immunol. 162, 1701–1703.
Jordan-Sciutto, K.L., Wang, G., Murphy-Corb, M., Wiley, C.A., 2000.
Induction of cell-cycle regulators in simian immunodeficiency virus
encephalitis. Am. J. Pathol. 157, 497–507.
Kaul, M., Lipton, S.A., 1999. Chemokines and activated macrophages in
HIV gp120-induced neuronal apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96, 8212–8216.
Ketzler, S., Weis, S., Haug, H., Budka, H., 1990. Loss of neurons in the
frontal cortex in AIDS brains. Acta Neuropathol. (Berlin) 80, 92–94.
Klein, R.S., Williams, K.C., Alvarez-Hernandez, X., Westmoreland, S.,
Force, T., Lackner, A.A., Luster, A.D., 1999. Chemokine receptor ex-
pression and signaling in macaque and human fetal neurons and astro-
cytes: implications for the neuropathogenesis of AIDS. J. Immunol.
163, 1636–1646.
Krajewski, S., James, H.J., Ross, J., Blumberg, B.M., Epstein, L.G., Gen-
delman, H.E., Gummuluru, S., Dewhurst, S., Sharer, L.R., Reed, J.C.,
et al., 1997. Expression of pro- and anti-apoptosis gene products in
brains from paediatric patients with HIV-1 encephalitis. Neuropathol.
Appl. Neurobiol. 23, 242–253.
Lavi, E., Strizki, J.M., Ulrich, A.M., Zhang, W., Fu, L., Wang, Q., O’Con-
nor, M., Hoxie, J.A., Gonzalez-Scarano, F., 1997. CXCR-4 (fusin), a
co-receptor for the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1), is
expressed in the human brain in a variety of cell types, including micro-
glia and neurons. Am. J. Pathol. 151, 1035–1042.
Li, Q., Eiden, L.E., Cavert, W., Reinhart, T.A., Rausch, D.M., Murray, E.A.,
Weihe, E., Haase, A.T., 1999. Increased expression of nitric oxide syn-
thase and dendritic injury in simian immunodeficiency encephalitis. J.
Hum. Virol. 2, 139–145.
Lipton, S.A., Sucher, N.J., Kaiser, P.K., Dreyer, E.B., 1991. Synergistic
effects of HIV coat protein and NMDA receptor-mediated neurotoxic-
ity. Neuron 7, 111–118.
Ma, Q., Jones, D., Borghesani, P.R., Segal, R.A., Nagasawa, T., Kishimo-
to, T., Bronson, R.T., Springer, T.A., 1998. Impaired B-lymphopoiesis,
myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and
SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9448–9453.
Marciario, J.K.,Raymond,L.A.,McKiernan,B.J., Foresman,L.L., Joag,S.V.,
Raghavan,R., 1999. Simple and choice reaction time performance in SIV-
infected rhesus macaques. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 15, 571–583.
Masliah, E., Achim, C.L., Ge, N., DeTeresa, R., Terry, R.D., Wiley, C.A.,
1992a. Spectrum of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neocort-
ical damage. Ann. Neurol. 32, 321–329.
Masliah, E., Ge, N., Achim, C.L., Hansen, L.A., Wiley, C.A., 1992b. Se-
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158 157
lective neuronal vulnerability in HIV encephalitis. J. Neuropathol. Exp.
Neurol. 51, 585–593.
Meucci, O., Fatatis, A., Simen, A.A., Bushell, T.J., Gray, P.W., Miller, R.J.,
1998. Chemokines regulate hippocampal neuronal signaling and gp120
neurotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14500–14505.
Ohagen, A., Ghosh, S., He, J., Huang, K., Chen, Y., Yuan, M., Osatha-
nondh, R., Gartner, S., Shi, B., Shaw, G., et al., 1999. Apoptosis in-
duced by infection of primary brain cultures with diverse human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates: evidence for a role of the
envelope. J. Virol. 73, 897–906.
Ohtani, Y., Minami, M., Kawaguchi, N., Nishiyori, A., Yamamoto, J.,
Takami, S., Satoh, M., 1998. Expression of stromal cell-derived fac-
tor-1 and CXCR4 chemokine receptor mRNAs in cultured rat glial and
neuronal cells. Neurosci. Lett. 249, 163–166.
Petito, C.K., Kerza-Kwiatecki, A.P., Gendelman, H.E., McCarthy, M.,
Nath, A., Podack, E.R., Shapshak, P., Wiley, C.A., 1999. Review: neu-
ronal injury in HIV infection. J. Neurovirol. 5, 327–341.
Qin, S., Rottman, J.B., Myers, P., Weinblatt, M., Loetscher, M., Koch, A.E.,
Moser, B., Mackay, C.R., 1998. The chemokine receptors CXCR3 and
CCR5 mark subsets of T cells with a homing predilection for certain
inflammatory sites. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 746–754.
Rosner, B., 1990. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. PWS-Kent Publishing,
Boston, MA.
Rottman, J.B., Ganley, K.P., Williams, K., Wu, L., Mackay, C.R., Ringler,
D.J., 1997. Cellular localization of the chemokine receptor CCR5. Cor-
relation to cellular targets of HIV-1 infection. Am. J. Pathol. 151,
1341–1351.
Sasseville, V.G., Smith, M.M., Mackay, C.R., Pauley, D.R., Mansfield, K.G.,
Ringler, D.J., Lackner, A.A., 1996. Chemokine expression in simian
immunodeficiency virus-induced AIDS encephalitis. Am. J. Pathol.
149, 1459–1467.
Schnell, A.S., Staines, W.A., Wessendorf, M.W., 1999. Reduction of lip-
ofuscin-like autofluorescence in fluorescently labeled tissue. J. Histo-
chem. Cytochem. 47, 719–730.
Tracey, I., Lane, J., Chang, I., Navia, B., Lackner, A., Gonzalez, R.G.,
1997. 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals neuronal injury in
a simian immunodeficiency virus macaque model. J. Acquired Immune
Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 15, 21–27.
van der Meer, P., Ulrich, A.M., Gonzalez-Scarano, F., Lavi, E., 2000.
Immunohistochemical analysis of CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4
in the human brain: potential mechanisms for HIV dementia. Exp. Mol.
Pathol. 69, 192–201.
van der Meer, P., Goldberg, S.H., Fung, K.M., Sharer, L.R., Gonzalez-
Scarano, F., Lavi, E., 2001. Expression pattern of CXCR3, CXCR4,
and CCR3 chemokine receptors in the developing human brain. J.
Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 60, 25–32.
Veazey, R.S., DeMaria, M., Chalifoux, L.V., Shvetz, D.E., Pauley, D.R.,
Knight, H.L., Rosenzweig, M., Johnson, R.P., Desrosiers, R.C., Lack-
ner, A.A., 1998. The gastrointestinal tract as a major site of CD4+T
cell depletion and viral replication in SIV infection. Science 280, 427–
431.
Vila-Coro, A.J., Rodriguez-Frade, J.M., Martin De Ana, A., Moreno-Or-
tiz, M.C., Martinez, A.C., Mellado, M., 1999. The chemokine SDF-
1alpha triggers CXCR4 receptor dimerization and activates the JAK/
STAT pathway [In Process Citation]. FASEB J. 13, 1699–1710.
Westmoreland, S.V., Rottman, J.B., Williams, K.C., Lackner, A.A., Sasse-
ville, V.G., 1998. Chemokine receptor expression on resident and in-
flammatory cells in the brain of macaques with SIV encephalitis. Am. J.
Pathol. 152, 659–665.
Wilfert, C.M., Wilson, C., Luzuriaga, K., Epstein, L., 1994. Pathogenesis of
pediatric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Infect. Dis.
170, 286–292.
Williams, K.C., Corey, S., Westmoreland, S.V., Pauley, D., Knight, H.,
deBakker, C., Alvarez, X., Lackner, A.A., 2001. Perivascular macro-
phages are the primary cell infected by SIV in the brain of macaques:
Implications for the neuropathogenesis of AIDS. J. Exp. Med. 193,
905–915.
Wykrzykowska, J.J., Rosenzweig, M., Veazey, R.S., Simon, M.A., Hal-
vorsen, K., Desrosiers, R.C., Johnson, R.P., Lackner, A.A., 1998. Early
regeneration of thymic progenitors in rhesus macaques infected with
simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1767–1778.
Yong, V.W., et al., 1992. Culture of glial cells from human brain biopsies.
In: Feoroff, R.A. (Ed.), Protocols for Neural Cell Cultures. Humana
Press, St. Louis, p. 81.
Zhang, L., He, T., Talal, A., Wang, G., Frankel, S.S., Ho, D.D., 1998. In
vivo distribution of the human immunodeficiency virus/simian immu-
nodeficiency virus coreceptors: CXCR4, CCR3, and CCR5. J. Virol.
72, 5035–5045.
Zheng, J., Thylin, M.R., Ghorpade, A., Xiong, H., Persidsky, Y., Cotter, R.,
Niemann, D., Che, M., Zeng, Y.C., Gelbard, H.A., et al., 1999. Intra-
cellular CXCR4 signaling, neuronal apoptosis and neuropathogenic
mechanisms of HIV-1-associated dementia. J. Neuroimmunol. 98,
185–200.
Zou, Y.R., Kottmann, A.H., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I., Littman, D.R., 1998.
Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in
cerebellar development. Nature 393, 595–599.
S.V. Westmoreland et al. / Journal of Neuroimmunology 122 (2002) 146–158158