applications in bionanotechnology of self-assembled peptide nanostructures
TRANSCRIPT
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Chapter 6
Applications in Bionanotechnology ofSelf-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
Yihua Loo, Elizabeth C. Wu, Anupama Lakshmanan, ArchanaMishra, and Charlotte A. E. HauserInstitute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, 31 Biopolis Way,The Nanos #04-01, 138669 [email protected]
6.1 Introduction
As early as 1959, Richard Feynman first presented the idea of
nanotechnology; envisioning “the possibility of maneuvering things
atom by atom” to provide a plethora of new opportunities for design
[1]. Since then, the advent of science and technology in providing
high-precision techniques and high-resolution tools for imaging,
production, and characterization has heralded the modern era of
nanotechnology. The older approach of “top-down” design, limited
by the starting material and its bulk properties, has given way to
the “bottom-up” approach that confers complete control of building
blocks for the desired end properties.
Bionanotechnology exploits lessons learnt by observing bio-
logical processes for designing molecular machinery to atomic
Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures: Advances and Applications in NanobiotechnologyEdited by Jaime Castillo-Leon, Luigi Sasso, and Winnie E. SvendsenCopyright c© 2012 Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.ISBN 978-981-4316-94-1 (Hardcover), 978-981-4364-47-8 (eBook)www.panstanford.com
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
148 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
specifications [2]. Self-assembly involves the spontaneous asso-
ciation and organization of individual components into coherent
and well-defined structures [3]. It occurs ubiquitously in nature at
macroscopic and microscopic scales and plays an important role in
many life processes. Cells are natural nanomachines that achieve
diverse functions ranging from replication, trafficking, recognition
and signaling through the self-assembly and organization of simple
biomolecules. The efficiency, high fidelity, and reproducibility of
cellular self-assembly processes make them ideal models for
designing nanostructures applied in bioengineering and medicine
[2].
Peptide and proteins are versatile building blocks for fabri-
cating supramolecular architectures such as synthetic membranes,
multilamellar structures, amphiphilic micelles, tubules and fibrillar
networks [4]. Precisely defined, hierarchical three-dimensional
(3D) structures can be obtained from the self-assembly of pep-
tides/proteins [5]. Peptide/protein self-assembly is highly specific
— the intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding, ionic,
electrostatic, hydrophobic, and van der Waals interactions are
mediated by molecular recognition. The information needed for
proper folding is encoded in the amino acid sequence, bypassing
the need for chemical crosslinkers such as glutaraldehyde (which
is cytotoxic). The peptide sequence also determines the three-
dimensional structure (formation of α-helices, β-sheets, micellar,
lamellar, and fibrillar structures) and material properties (mechani-
cal strength, stimuli-sensitivity, assembly/disassembly reversibility,
and kinetics). As solid-phase peptide synthesis or genetic engi-
neered cells are used to produce the monomers, exact control of the
polypeptide/protein sequence, length, and hence 3D structure can
be achieved.
6.2 Peptide/Protein Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine
6.2.1 Engineering Synthetic Extracellular Matrix
The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an integral role in cell
patterning, migration, proliferation, and differentiation [6]. It not
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide/Protein Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine 149
only provides structural support as a passive scaffold substrate;
but also dynamically interacts with the cells through receptor-
mediated signalling, sequestration of growth factors (GFs), spatial
cues, and transduction of mechanical forces [7]. In this regard, a
major challenge is to produce a biomaterial that closely mimics
the structure and properties of the ECM while overcoming the
immunogenicity, non-specific interactions, chemical instability, and
large batch–batch variation of intact ECM proteins [8]. In summary,
ideal scaffolds should have good biocompatibility and proper
biodegradation, sufficient porosity, ability to promote cell prolif-
eration and cellular ECM production, while maintaining cellular
phenotype and function [9]. In addition, synthesis of the scaffold
biomaterial must be facile, scalable, reproducible, and cost-effective
for successful commercialization.
Peptide amphiphiles self-assemble to form complex, supramole-
cular three-dimensional architectures that provide specialized
microenvironments and niches for cell–cell adhesion, growth, pro-
liferation, migration, and morphogenesis necessary for functional
tissues [10]. These amphiphilic molecules typically refer to (i)
amphiphilic peptides consisting only of amino acids with a hy-
drophilic, polar headgroup, and a hydrophobic tail; (ii) hydrophilic
peptides conjugated to hydrophobic alkyl chains or fatty acids and;
(iii) peptide-based co-polymers [8]. Diverse nanostructures such as
vesicles, micelles, monolayers, bilayers, fibers, ribbons, and tapes
can be formed by the self-assembly of peptide amphiphiles [8]. By
altering the structural segments, the morphology, surface chemistry,
structural, and functional characteristics of the peptide can be
modulated [8], giving rise to “smart bio-materials” that respond
to physicochemical triggers such as concentration, pH, light, ionic
strength, solvent, and temperature [3].
Thus, peptide-amphiphiles serve as versatile tools for soft bioma-
terials. Their applications in regenerative medicine are realized by
their ability to provide a complex, 3D supramolecular architecture
resembling natural ECM. In addition, they are also used as invitro model systems for the characterization and understanding of
fundamental biological processes such as structure and function of
protein domains, cell adhesion, gene expression, receptor–ligand
interaction, and protein production [8].
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
150 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
6.2.2 Peptide Hydrogels for Tissue EngineeringApplications
Combining the understanding of molecular and structural biology
with materials engineering and design will enable new strategies
to develop biological tissue constructs for clinical applications. Self-
assembled peptides are attractive candidates for tissue-engineered
scaffolds, particularly hydrogels that contain more than 99%
water, as they are biomimetic, and provide spatial and temporal
regulation [11]. Furthermore, self-assembling peptides capable of
in situ gelation serve as attractive candidates for minimally invasive
injectable therapies. The peptide hydrogels can also be tuned to
optimize their mechanical and physiochemical properties to match
the tissue of interest. A variety of studies using peptide amphiphiles
as scaffolds have demonstrated the induction of biomineralization
[12], reducing glial-scar tissue formation [13] and controlling
neuronal progenitor cell differentiation [14].
The first self-assembling peptide was discovered in Baker’s
yeast by Zhang and co-workers [15] while studying the protein
Zuotin, which had a repetitive peptide motif of 16 amino acids
(n-AEAEAKAKAEAEAKAK-c) that adopted a β-sheet configuration
by nature of self-complementary ionic interactions [16]. Similar
peptides were subsequently designed to form three-dimensional
(3D) nanofiber scaffolds for tissue culture applications. In particular,
RAD16, which is now commercially available as PuraMatrixTM
,
has been used in a wide range of biomaterial applications,
including cartilage tissue repair [17], osteoblast proliferation and
differentiation [18], hepatocyte differentiation [19], brain repair and
axon regeneration [20], and bone regeneration [21]. Interestingly,
the RAD16-I peptide scaffold lacks any peptide signalling motif.
This suggests that the 3D architecture of the peptide nanofibers
has intrinsic properties that promote cell growth, proliferation, and
migration [22]. RAD16 peptide hydrogel has also been evaluated
as a matrix for osteogenic differentiation of co-cultured bone
marrow stem cells in vitro and in vivo [23]. KLD12, another self-
assembling peptide, formed hydrogel scaffolds that were found
suitable for cartilage repair by fostering ECM production by bovine
chondrocytes [17]. The biocompatibility of these hydrogels were
also evaluated with rabbit mesenchymal stem cells [24] and nucleus
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide/Protein Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine 151
pulposus cells [9], allowing their potential application as tissue
engineered intervertebral discs. In addition, RAD16-I and (D-form)
d-EAK16 nanofiber barriers were also found to facilitate hemostasis
at surgical wound sites [25, 26].
β−sheet peptide hydrogels can also be formed from Lysβ-21
via triple-stranded β-sheets in the β-domain of the protein [27], as
demonstrated by Aggeli and colleagues. They also studied β-peptide
P11-4 (QQRFEWEFEQQ), which self-assembled into anti-parallel β-
tapes that stack together to form fibrils when the pH was changed
[28]. The resulting hydrogel was used as injectable scaffolds for
treating bone defects, dental hypersensitivity, and dental decay [29].
It was proposed that the peptides formed a fibril network within the
pores of the caries-like lesion, where the anionic groups of the side
chains could attract calcium, leading to the de novo precipitation of
the respective phosphate salts [30].
Pochan, Scneider, and colleagues have also discovered a class of
self-assembling β-hairpin peptides that are promising candidates
for injectable hydrogel scaffolds [31]. These peptides comprise
two β-strands with alternating hydrophobic valine and hydrophilic
lysine residues covalently bonded to a central tetra-peptide turn
sequence. The resulting solid hydrogels exhibited reversible shear-
thinning and consequent flow under an applied stress. This team
also designed a peptide that exhibited complete thermoreversible
self-assembly into a hydrogel network [32]. Such hydrogels can be
used to make smart scaffolds that respond to environmental cues.
6.2.3 α−Helical Peptide Hydrogels
Woolfson et al. rationally designed peptides that formed self-
assembling fibers (SAFs) based on α-helical coiled-coils [33–35]
enabling elucidation of design principles that underlie self-assembly
of such systems. Their design was based on two-component peptide
systems that have a coiled-coil heptad sequence repeat, abcdefg, in
which the a and d positions were occupied by isoleucine and leucine,
respectively. They recently designed a new class of hydrogelating
self-assembling fibers (hSAFs) that form α-helical hydrogels [36].
This was achieved by replacing specific amino acid residues of SAFs
involved in charged interactions with those that have a weaker and
more general interactions at all b, c, and f sites. The hydrogels that
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
152 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
were composed of smaller, more flexible, and thinner fibers were
found to support bone growth and differentiation of rat adrenal
pheochromocytoma cells for sustained culture periods [36].
6.2.4 Aligned Monodomain Gels for 3D Cell Culture
Peptide amphiphiles, such as the hydrophilic peptide VVVAAA
EEE(COOH) linked to a C16 alkyl tail at the N-terminus, were
reported to alter their supramolecular architecture in response
to temperature changes [37]. These molecules self-assembled into
gels containing nanofibers in the presence of ions that screened
the charged amino acid residues. Heating solutions of randomly
entangled, isotropic, unscreened molecules aligned the system into
long filaments of bundled nanofibers. This unique property was
exploited to direct the orientation of cells in 3D environments,
forming monodomain fibrous gels with macroscopically aligned
arrays of cells. Stupp and colleagues are applying this technology
to develop aligned scaffolds that direct cell migration, growth
and spatial cell interconnections for brain, heart, and spinal cord
tissue engineering [37]. They have also developed a class of self-
assembling peptide amphiphiles that formed 3D nanofiber networks
[38]. These molecules consisted of a 6–12 amino acid peptide
segment coupled to a (10–22 carbon) fatty acid chain. The self-
assembly process has been exploited to entrap cells in the matrix,
without compromising the cell viability, proliferation, and motility
[38]. In addition, Hartgerink et al. designed bio-active elastic peptide
amphiphilic nanofibers that promoted cell-mediated degradation of
the gel through a matrix metalloproteinase specific cleavage site
[39].
6.2.5 Functionalized and Hybrid Peptide Hydrogels
Scaffolds have also been developed by using peptide motifs derived
from ECM proteins. For example, the α1(IV)1263-1277 collagen
sequence (called IV-H1), which promotes melanoma cell spreading
and adhesion, has been functionalized with C12, C14, and C16 mono-
and dialkyl chains to make collagen-mimetic peptide amphiphiles
with stable triple helical conformations [40]. The effect of changing
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide/Protein Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine 153
the length, number of alkyl chains, and temperature on the self-
assembly of model collagen-mimetic amphiphiles has been explored
[41]. Cell adhesion and spreading can be controlled by using
PEG-lipidated molecules of varying length to selectively mask the
bioactive amphiphilic peptide and alter ligand accessibility [42].
Self-assembling peptide sequences have also been modified at the N
and C terminus to incorporate functional groups for conjugation to
growth factors and cell recognition motifs, such as RGD. Palkans et al.
[43] investigated the effect of orientation and conformation of RGD
peptide amphiphiles on cell responses using two conformations of
the RGD peptide (linear and cyclic), as well as N- and C-grafted RGD
peptides. RGD incorporated into self-assembling peptide amphiphile
matrices have been applied as scaffolds for dental stem cells
[44]. Laminin epitope IKVAV conjugated to peptide amphiphile
nanofibers have also been used to encapsulate neural progenitor
cells. This nanofiber gel matrix induced rapid neuronal differenti-
ation while simultaneously inhibiting astrocyte development [14].
Lastly, electrospun scaffolds of self-assembling peptides with poly-
ethylene oxide have been developed for bone tissue engineering
in a recent approach that amalgamates different design strategies
[45].
6.2.6 Ultra Small Peptide Hydrogels
Recently, Hauser and colleagues reported a new class of very
small peptides that self-assembled to long fibers under aqueous or
physiological conditions [46, 47]. Interestingly, during self-assembly,
this peptide class adopted different structural configurations in a
transition process toward supramolecular fibrous structures. This
new class of systematically designed tri- to heptamer peptides
demonstrated one of the smallest non-aromatic structures that
self-assembled to hydrogels. The fibrous scaffolds assembled into
three-dimensional meshes that entrapped up to 99.9% water
and resembled collagen fibers in the extracellular matrix. The
biocompatible hydrogels were found to be heat-resistant up to
90◦C with high and tunable mechanical strength [47]. To date, a
variety of mammalian primary cells have been successfully cultured
on these peptide hydrogels. In light of their biocompatibility and
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
154 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
high mechanical strengths of up to 90 kPa, potential applications
include injectable therapies for degenerative disc disease. There is
a strong clinical need for a non-invasive disc repair that can hinder
or impair early-stage disc damage. Considering the facile and cost-
effective synthesis of the peptide hydrogels, as well as their tunable
properties, this class of ultrasmall peptide hydrogels can serve
as attractive biomaterials for applications ranging from injectable
biomedical therapies to tissue-engineered scaffolds.
6.3 Delivery of Bioactive Therapeutics
6.3.1 Peptide and Protein-Based Hydrogel DrugDelivery Devices
The molecular architecture of biomaterials used in drug delivery de-
vices determines their physiochemical characteristics and biological
fate. Self-assembled peptides/proteins are of great interest as their
sequences, molecular weights, composition, and stereochemistry
can be precisely defined by solid phase synthesis or biosynthesis
using genetic engineered cells. This leads to well-characterized
assembly/dissociation kinetics, incorporation of biorecognition
motifs, controlled biodegradation, and stimuli sensitivity; properties
integral to controlled drug delivery.
Injectable drug delivery systems that form biodegradable net-
works in situ following injection, have been the focus of many
studies [48]. These systems typically consist of polymers that form
viscoelastic gels under physiological conditions, or in response to
stimuli such as UV exposure, changes in temperature, pH, and ionic
environment. A few of these systems are based on self-assembling
peptides and proteins.
Silk-elastin-like polymers (SELPs) are one such class of self-
assembling polypeptides that irreversibly self-assemble into hydro-
gels via hydrogen bond mediated crosslinks. These protein polymers
are composed of tandemly repeated silk-like (GAGAGS) and elastin-
like (GVGVP) amino acid blocks. The former forms β-sheets,
imparting thermal and chemical stability, while the latter increases
the flexibility and water solubility. Extensive characterization of
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Delivery of Bioactive Therapeutics 155
SELP hydrogels have been done to ascertain gel-formation, stimuli-
sensitivity, biodegradation, biocompatibility, and biorecognition
[49]. SELP hydrogels have been applied to the delivery of anti-tumor
drugs, as well as hydrophilic and ionic compounds. Capello et al. [50]
characterized the drug release kinetics from SELP-47K hydrogels.
The gel was used to deliver recombinant mitotoxin Pantarin,
demonstrating that encapsulation by SELP-47K did not affect the
bioactivity and slow, sustained drug release was feasible. In separate
studies, SELP-47K hydrogels were used to deliver theophylline,
vitamin B, and cytochrome C, hydrophilic compounds with varying
molecular weights [51, 52]. Controlled release of plasmid DNA and
adenoviral vectors for cancer gene therapy have also been explored
by Megeed et al. [53]. To increase their versatility, “smart” SELPs
have also been designed to render the hydrogel stimuli-responsive.
Nagarsekar et al. [54] reported that the substitution of glutamic
acid for valine in some of the elastin blocks conferred temperature
sensitivity. The resulting polypeptides demonstrated completely
reversible temperature-dependent gelation.
Elastin-based polypeptides (ELPs) with characteristic pentapep-
tide motif (VPGVG)m(VPGXG)n, are also capable of self-assembling
into micelles [55] and nanoparticles [56]. ELP diblock copolymers
consisting of hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks exhibit thermally
triggered nanoscale self-assembly. Their phase transition tempera-
ture can be precisely controlled by amino acid sequence. Chilkoti
and co-workers have developed ELP micelles and nanoparticles for
anti-cancer drug delivery [57]. Hydrophobic drugs conjugated to
hydrophilic ELPs self-assemble into micelles [55], which can then
be systemically administered to the patient. Enhanced permeability
and retention at the tumors site result in micelle and hence drug
accumulation. Thermal targeting can also be achieved by exploiting
the temperature sensitivity of ELPs. Phase transition-triggered
aggregation of ELPs occurs when the tumors locale is heated.
Conjugation of tumors-targeting ligand further increases uptake by
cancer cells. Local delivery of anti-cancer drugs can be facilitated by
ELPs that coacervates following intratumorsal injection [58]. ELPs
are attractive macromolecular carriers for cancer therapeutics as
their biocompatibility, genetically encoded synthesis, and stimuli
responsiveness provide highly tunable properties that can be
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
156 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
rationally optimized for a given drug [59]. ELPs can also be applied
to recombinant protein purification [60]. In this approach, phase
transition of ELP fusion proteins is triggered by the addition of
heat or salt. The ELP aggregates are then separated from the cell
lysate by centrifugation. Resolubilization of the aggregates in cold
buffer then allows the removal of insoluble protein contaminants.
Repetitions of the inverse transition cycling process further increase
the purity of the ELP fusion protein. This technology presents many
advantages over current chromatographic recombinant protein
purification techniques, including cost, technological simplicity, ease
of multiplexing, and high yields.
Hydrogels from self-assembled ABA polypeptide triblock copoly-
mers, where block A is a coiled-coil forming peptide and block B a
random coil, also demonstrate temperature and pH-responsiveness.
Minor modifications to the amino acids of the coiled-coil domains
have a significant impact on the folding and unfolding of the helical
structure. Consequently, reversible gelation and dissolution can be
modulated by temperature and pH changes [61].
Hybrid hydrogels are synergistic combinations of self-
assembling peptide/protein domains and synthetic polymers. The
peptide domain confers a level of control over the structure
formation at the nanoscale level, giving rise to novel biomaterials
with unique properties and structural organization [62]. Kopecek
and colleagues have developed several hybrid hydrogels based
on coiled-coil protein motifs grafted onto N -(2-hydroxypropyl)
methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymers [5]. Self-assembly of the
coiled-coil kinesin domains from their unfolded state to elongated
helices resulted in hydrogel formation [63]. Hybrid systems that
incorporated two or more different coiled-coil domains form gels
capable of stepwise transitions, with each step triggered by a differ-
ent temperature. This feature is extremely attractive for designing
multi-phasic or pulsatile drug delivery systems. The phase transition
is also influenced by the melting temperature of the protein
domains, which can be tuned by the amino acid sequence. Other
self-assembling hybrid systems utilized two oppositely charged
antiparallel heterodimeric coiled-coils grafted to HPMA [64] and
polyethylene glycol [65, 66].
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Delivery of Bioactive Therapeutics 157
6.3.2 Viral Peptide Self-Assembly in Gene Delivery andVaccine Development
The structural proteins of viral capsids self-assemble into robust
nanostructures ranging from 22 to 150 nm. Simple morphologies
include helical (such as the tobacco mosaic virus) and icosahedral
(such as adenovirus). In helical viruses, a single protein subunit
(capsomer) stacks around a central axis, resulting in rod-shaped
helices that interact electrostatically with the single-stranded viral
RNA and DNA. Icosahedral morphology is the most optimal method
of forming a closed shell from identical subunits and contains
multiple axes of symmetry. Enveloped viruses (such as influenza
and lentivirus) are able to use their viral capsid proteins to interact
with lipids, enabling them to further assemble an encapsulating lipid
envelope from the host membrane.
Regardless of their shape, viruses are genetically tailored to
encapsulate, protect, and deliver the viral genome. As such, modified
viruses are some of the most effective gene delivery vectors known
to date. Nucleic acids are regarded as a novel class of therapeutics
to treat a variety of inherited and acquired diseases. Plasmid DNA
can induce the regulated production of therapeutic proteins [67–
70], eliminating the need for intravenously administered substitutes
derived from donors and animals; while small interfering RNA
and anti-sense oligonucleotides can inhibit the expression of mis-
coded or harmful proteins. By virtue of evolution, viral vectors can
effectively enter their host cells, circumvent the various cellular
barriers and deliver the gene of interest to the nucleus for
expression. Viruses such as lentivirus are able to integrate the gene
of interest into the host genome, resulting in high-level, sustained
protein expression. To date, viral vectors are highly successful in the
laboratory. However, there is significant concern regarding their use
as gene delivery vectors due to their immunogenicity and ability to
cause insertional mutagenesis [71–73].
The immunogenicity of viral capsid proteins have also led to
their efficacy as adjuvants and antigens in vaccination. Currently,
attenuated and inactivated viruses are routinely used in vaccines
against infectious diseases such as influenza and smallpox. There
is increasing interest in using viruses as delivery vectors for DNA
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
158 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
vaccination, in which the virus serves to deliver the gene sequence
encoding the antigenic peptide and as an adjuvant.
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are repeated peptide arrays assem-
bled from the structural proteins of viruses, but do not contain any
genetic material. Hence, VLPs are non-infectious. For instance, the
expression of the small envelope protein of the hepatitis B (HBV)
virus in yeast or mammalian cells resulted in the production of
22 nm VLPs that formed the basis of first generation HBV vaccines
[74]. More recently, VLPs assembled from recombinant L1 protein of
human papillomavirus (HPV) were used as a basis for HPV vaccines.
In the clinical trials, the HPV VLP vaccine was well tolerated and
highly immunogenic even in the absence of additional adjuvants,
with a majority of the recipients having serum antibody titers
that were approximately 40 times greater than observed in natural
infection [75]. The self-adjuvanting effects of VLPs are attributed to
their size, which facilitates uptake by dendritic cells (responsible for
MHC class II response).
VLPs are also used to display foreign antigenic epitopes or
targeting molecules. Synthetic peptides are of great interest as
antigens due to their precise chemical definition, allowing great
control over the exact epitopes against which an immune response
is to be raised. However, most synthetic peptides are poorly
immunogenic in the absence of a co-administered adjuvant [76].
VLPs provide the spatial structure for the display of conformational
epitopes and in doing so are more likely to mimic the native
virus structure, thereby enhancing the production of neutralizing
antibodies [74]. By modifying the VLP gene sequence, fusion
proteins of VLP and antigenic peptides are assembled into VLPs
during de novo synthesis. Some VLPs are also capable of presenting
multiple vaccine antigens. BioHepB, a recombinant HBV-derived VLP
from mammalian cells, is a good example [77]. The incorporation
of both the preS1 and preS2 viral envelope antigens with the
HBV self-assembling structural protein (HBsAg), resulted in VLPs
that better mimicked the virion envelope. The resulting vaccine
elicited antibody responses to preS1 and preS2 antigens, and
more importantly, enhanced T-cell mediated immunity, leading to
an earlier antibody response and improved seroprotection rate.
Foreign antigenic epitopes can also be chemically conjugated to
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide Self-Assembly in Nanofabrication 159
pre-formed VLPs, enabling the presentation of non-protein antigens
such as nicotine [78].
6.4 Peptide Self-Assembly in Nanofabrication
6.4.1 Biomineralization
Biomineralization is the process by which hierarchically structured
materials are biologically produced for various purposes such
as mechanical strength and defense [79, 80]. A critical step in
biomineralization is the crystallization of inorganic compounds in
the presence of organic molecules [81]. This process has been
widely studied in order to develop strategies for the fabrication of
novel biomaterials based on synthetic organic–inorganic composites
[80]. Self-assembling amphiphilic peptides have been used in the
development of these synthetic methods to mimic the biological
system of mineral crystal nucleation, growth, and morphology
[82–84].
One mineral of interest is calcium carbonate (CaCO3), the most
abundant biomineral and an important structural biomaterial. Much
of synthetically produced CaCO3, however, does not strongly resem-
ble naturally occurring CaCO3 [79]. To address this issue, Volkmer
and colleagues used amphiphilic peptides comprising alternating
hydrophilic (aspartic acid) and hydrophobic (phenylalanine) amino
acid residues to imitate the epitopes of acidic proteins found in
calcified tissues [81]. They found that the amphiphilic peptides H-
(FD)2-OH and H-(FD)4-OH selectively interacted with two distinct
faces of calcite. In addition, scanning electron micrograph (SEM)
images revealed that the calcite crystals grown in the presence
of these amphiphilic peptides had similar morphological features
to the calcite crystals grown in solutions containing natural acidic
proteins.
Self-assembling peptide amphiphiles have been used to in-
vestigate the process of CaCO3 mineralization. Kros, Sommerdijk
and coworkers used an amphiphilic lipopeptide to investigate the
influence of structural adaption of the organic template on calcite
crystal growth [83]. They modified the water-soluble octapeptide
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
160 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
(LE)4 with a phospholipid moiety, which self-assembled into a
flexible 2D β-sheet. Using this peptide as a flexible template for the
mineralization of CaCO3, nucleation of different crystal faces was
achieved. In addition, they discovered a new type of oriented calcite
crystal nucleated underneath the flexible amphiphilic lipopeptide
monolayer. This formation was observed to be in much less abun-
dance when a less flexible template was used, demonstrating the
importance of organic template flexibility in CaCO3 mineralization
[85].
The mineralization of hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering
can also be directed by self-assembling peptides [12, 83, 84].
The multiple levels of hierarchical organization present within
bone structure (such as the specific organization of organic and
inorganic nanophases [12, 86]) present challenges to synthesizing
materials that resemble bone. Stupp and colleagues attempted to
address these challenges by designing a lipopeptide to fabricate a
material that maintains the nanoscale orientation between collagen
and hydroxyapapite found in bone [12]. The peptide amphiphile
consisted of five key structural features: (i) a long alkyl tail to
impart a hydrophobic region to the molecule, (ii) four consecutive
cysteine residues to form disulfide bonds for polymerization of
the self-assembled structure, (iii) three glycine residues to provide
flexibility, (iv) a single phosphorylated serine residue to interact
with calcium ions and direct the mineralization of hydroxyapatite,
and (v) the cell adhesion ligand RGD. This specially designed
peptide amphiphile was found to self-assemble into fibers at pH
4, and subsequent oxidation of the cysteine thiol groups allowed
for stable fibers in alkaline solutions. Additionally, mineralization
of hydroxyapatite resulted in crystals that were co-aligned with
the long axes of the fibers. The resulting structure formed by
the nanofibers thus resembled the organization of hydroxyapatite
crystals in mineralized ECM, an important step in bone formation.
Many self-assembling materials are macroscopically disordered,
and the ability to control the placement and orientation of am-
phiphile peptide nanofibers may be of added benefit for biominer-
alization by adding another level of order. Hung and colleagues were
able to demonstrate the simultaneous self-assembly, alignment, and
patterning of peptide amphiphiles containing either RGD or IKVAV
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide Self-Assembly in Nanofabrication 161
sequences by soft lithography [87]. The nanofibers oriented parallel
to the microchannels that were produced by an elastomeric stamp
as they assembled out of solution. This patterned surface containing
epitopes for promoting cell adhesion can be advantageous in
controlling cell behavior, and can be modified for use in templated
biomineralization.
6.4.2 Synthesis of Inorganic Nanoparticles
The synthesis and assembly of inorganic nanoparticles, such as Au
and CdS, are of great interest for biomedical imaging, therapeutics,
and sensing due to their unique optical, magnetic, and electronic
properties [88, 89]. Nanocomposites of these inorganic nanocrystals
with organic matrices can lead to enhanced properties not observed
in the individual components [90]. Additionally, 1D composites
of inorganic nanoparticles with organic nanofibers can be used
as components of electrical or optical biodevices [90]. The use
of peptide amphiphile nanofibers as organic matrices for the
fabrication of these inorganic nanoparticles has recently been in-
vestigated. Kelly and coworkers, for example, designed amphiphilic
peptidomimetics that self-assembled into 2D β-sheet monolayers at
the air–water interface [91]. They found that this easily synthesized
peptidomimetic amphiphile allowed for the nucleation of CdS
crystals. The Stupp group has also investigated the use of peptide-
based nanofibers for the nucleation and growth of CdS nanocrystals
[92]. Without the nanofiber template, they observed a different
polymorph of CdS in which the particles were no longer quantum
confined, indicating that peptide nanofiber templated CdS nucleated
on the nanofibers themselves. Peptide amphiphiles consisting of
a 14-carbon acid-based tail and a GG-COO− head group have also
been examined for synthesizing CdS nanoparticles [90]. Zhou and
colleagues found that these amphiphiles self-assembled into hollow
cylindrical structures in aqueous solutions and that the COO− head
group allowed for coordination with Cd2+ ions. The result was
the formation of uniformly dispersed CdS nanoparticles in the
membrane wall of the peptide amphiphile nanotube.
Stupp and coworkers also reported the one-dimensional as-
sembly of Au nanoparticles in apolar solvents using peptide-based
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
162 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
nanofibers [93]. The peptide nanofiber was formed by the co-
assembly of two different peptides: a tripeptide amphiphile and
a peptide amphiphile containing a thymine moiety as a binding
site. When a solution of Au nanoparticles functionalized with
diaminopyridine was added to the nanofiber suspension, linear
arrays of Au nanoparticles formed as a result of the specific
binding between the nanoparticles and the nanofibers. These results
indicate that peptide-based nanofibers can be used as a platform for
constructing 1D assemblies of lipophilic inorganic nanoparticles.
The synthesis of silica-based nanoparticles and nanotubes have
also garnered much interest in the field of bionanotechnology due to
their potential in drug delivery and biosensing [94]. In this regard,
an 11-residue peptide was designed by Meegan and colleagues to
assemble into 1D antiparallel β-sheets, which further assembled to
fibrils [95]. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) was added to the fibril
suspensions and it was observed that the fibrils became coated
with silica, resulting in silica nanotubes. More recently, Yuwono
and colleagues explored the use of peptide amphiphiles containing
four alanine residues followed by four lysine or histidine residues
as templates for TEOS polymerization in the formation of silica
nanotubes [96]. They found that the peptide amphiphile fibers acted
as a nucleating agent and catalyst for silica formation. In addition,
the thickness of the silica coating could be tuned by modifying
the fiber length. In another work, Xu and coworkers investigated
the use of ultrashort peptides that can self-assemble into stable
nanostructures for the fabrication of silica nanotubes [97]. They
found that the peptide I3K self-assembled into nanotubes and were
stable against heating or exposure to organic solvents. Furthermore,
the Lys groups on the inner and outer surfaces of the nanotube
were able to catalyze silicification, leading to the formation of silica
nanotubes.
6.5 Molecular Imaging
Molecular imaging has become a vital tool both in the research
setting for studying the molecular basis of diseases, and in the
clinical setting such as for locating a tumor in the body [98].
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Molecular Imaging 163
Although enormous strides have been made in imaging techniques,
there is still a need for the development of new biologically
compatible imaging probes and contrast agents that are specific for
certain cell markers or tissues [98]. Peptide amphiphiles can play
a role in the development of nanocarriers to target imaging probes
to the diseased site. For example, Tanisaka and coworkers devel-
oped nonionic amphiphilic copolypeptides comprising hydrophilic
poly(sarcosine) and hydrophobic poly(γ -methyl L-glutamate) blocks
[99]. These polypeptides were able to form vesicular assemblies, or
peptosomes, and could be labeled with a near-infrared fluorescence
(NIRF) probe. In vivo evaluation indicated that the peptosomes
had a long circulation time in the mouse. In addition, due to the
enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, successful NIRF
imaging of a small cancer on the mouse using the peptosome
was achieved. In another example, Berti and colleagues developed
a thiol-reactive iodoacetyl polyhistidine linker for conjugation to
DNA [100]. The peptidyl linker allowed the DNA to self-assemble
with luminescent quantum dots. The quantum dot bioconjugates
were found to withstand strongly in reducing environments such as
the intracellular cytoplasm, indicating their potential as fluorescent
probes for cellular imaging.
In addition to the development of fluorescent probes, self-
assembling peptide amphiphiles have also been investigated as
carriers of contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The paramagnetic metal ion Gd(III) is widely used as a MR agent due
to its long electronic relaxation time. However, a high concentration
of Gd(III) is needed due to a lack of in vivo sensitivity [101, 102].
To increase sensitivity for obtaining contrast over an extended
period of time, the relaxivity of the MR agent needs to be increased.
This can be achieved by increasing the molecular weight of the
MR agent by conjugation to larger compounds [101]. Accardo and
colleagues approached this challenge by designing a mixed micelle
comprising a C18 hydrophobic moiety bound to an octapeptide
amide (CCK8) and a second amphiphilic compound containing a
chelating moiety or its Gd complex [102]. Evaluation of the micelle
showed that the bioactive peptide CCK8 was pointed toward the
external surface. This bioactive peptide can be used to target
receptors that are overexpressed in various cancers such as small
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
164 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
cell lung and colon cancer. Additionally, relaxivity values of the
mixed micelles were also largely enhanced in comparison to the Gd
complex alone. In another work, Stupp and coworkers modified two
peptide amphiphiles with 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10
tetraactic acid (DOTA) for chelation of Gd(III) [101]. Self-assembly
of these peptide amphiphile contrast agents resulted in nanofibers
or spherical micelles. Integration of additional bioactive functions
and an increase in the T1 relaxation time indicates the potential
of peptide amphiphiles in the fabrication of target-specific contrast
agents.
6.6 Peptide Organogels
Organogels are applied in a wide variety of fields including
chemistry, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, biotechnology, and food
technology. Organogels are viscoelastic systems comprising a
continuous non-aqueous liquid phase immobilized in a three-
dimensional network of self-assembled, crosslinked, or entangled
gelator fibers. The organogelators are either low molecular weight
(LMW) or polymers. The continuous phase is typically an organic
solvent, mineral, or vegetable oil. The formation of the gelling matrix
depends on the components’ physicochemical properties and their
resulting interactions [103, 104]. The organogelator entraps the
liquid phase by forming a network of crosslinked and entangled
chains in chemical and physical gels, respectively. Physical gels can
be further stabilized by weak inter-chain interactions such as hydro-
gen bonding, van der Waals forces, and π–π interactions. Depending
on the interactions between the organogelators and liquid phase,
either solid or fluid matrix organogels are obtained [103].
Solid matrix gels are formulated by dissolving the gelator in the
heated solvent, wherein the concentration can be as low as 0.1%
as reported in case of sugar-derived supergelators [105]. Aggregate
formation occurs when the affinity between the organogelator and
solvent decreases at lower temperatures. The solvent-aggregate
affinity further limits phase separation. Solid matrix gels are
also more robust and stronger compared to the fluid matrices,
as their fiber networks have relatively large (pseudo)crystalline
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
Peptide Organogels 165
microdomains [103] as junction points. Other factors such as steric
effects, polarity, supramolecular chirality, thermoreversibility also
influence organogel formation.
Fluid matrix gels are formed when polar solvents are incor-
porated into organic solutions of organogelator. They consist of
fluid fibers that entrap the organic solvent. As the aggregate size
increases, these structures eventually entangle, immobilizing the
solvent via surface tension. These gels are weaker than solid
matrices due to the aggregate fluidity and the transience of junction
points. These structures are also referred to as “worm-like” or
“polymer-like” networks [103].
When dispersed in organic solvents, some peptides self-assemble
into macromolecular structures that entrap the solvent, forming
peptide organogels. In these systems, two types of interactions
stabilize their self-assembled structures — solvophobic interactions
with the solvent molecules and interactions between solvophobic
groups in the interior of the aggregate. Lyon et al. demonstrated
that the oxidized disulfide form of tripeptide glutathione (γ -
ECG) are low molecular weight organogelators. The tripeptide
adopted an intramoleular, antiparallel β-sheet-type conformation
that was further stabilized by the restricted rotation about the
disulphide bond. In bulk aqueous solutions of dimethyl sulfoxide,
dimethylformamide, and methanol, transparent thermoreversible
gels were formed [106]. Studies by Banerjee and co-workers
revealed the importance of π–π interactions between adjacent
phenylalanine residues in Boc-LVFFA-OMe pentapeptide for self-
assembly and gelation in organic solvents (benzene, toluene, m-
xylene, and 1,2-dichlorobnzene) [107]. Understanding the different
interactions that lead to peptide self-assembly in organic solvents
will facilitate the design and synthesis of new gelators.
Self-assembled micellar structures can also be obtained when
peptides are dispersed in organic solvents. Micelles of Boc-
protected isoleucine pentapeptide (Boc-IIIII-OMe) were stabilized
by intermolecular hydrogen bonding in presence of solvents like
chloroform and N, N -dimethylformamide. At higher peptide con-
centrations, the micelles formed fibrils with β-sheet conformation
()[108]. Other macrostructures obtained include β-turn fibers from
diphenylalanine dimer peptides [109].
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
166 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
Peptide organogels have also been formulated from peptide den-
drimers and synthetic peptide–polymer conjugates. Peptide-based
dendritic gels are a bridge between polymeric and low molecular
weight organogelators [110]. Smith and colleagues performed a
systematic study of lysine-based dendritic gelators. By altering the
spacer chain, generation of dendrons and dendrimers, solvents,
stereochemistry, stoichiometric ratio of the two components and
peripheral groups, the characteristics of the resulting organogels
can be modulated [111–114]. Photoreversible dendritic organogels
have been obtained from second generation poly(Gly-Asp) dendrons
containing an azobenzene focal point [115].
Like their hydrogel counterparts, organogels are of great interest
as drug delivery devices. l-alanine derivatives in safflower oil gel
in situ following subcutaneous injection, forming a depot for the
sustained delivery of leuprolide in prostate cancer treatment [116].
Acelofenac delivery using N -Lauroyl- l alanine derivatives (LA)
was described by Anne-Claude and co-workers. The fluid matrix
organogels were formulated using soya bean oil as the continuous
phase and ethanol as the cosolvent [117]. Palui et al. demonstrated
the use of dendrimers of l-aspartic acid and succinic acid in gelling
edible oils [110]. The ability to use peptides to structure edible oils
is of interest in the field of food technology.
In other fields, Yan et al. explored the use of peptide-based
organogels as stabilizers for storage of inorganic materials. Channon
and co-workers also presented interesting work in utilizing self-
assembling peptide fibers to formulate light-harvesting nanomate-
rials [118].
6.7 Conclusions
Taking inspiration from naturally occurring self-assembling pro-
teins such as collagen, elastin, silk, and viral capsids, scientists
experimented with various self-assembling peptide motifs in an
effort to understand the molecular interactions that drive self-
assembly. In the process, they discovered novel self-assembling
peptide sequences and developed new soft biomaterials [119,
120] for a variety of biomedical and technological applications
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 167
[4, 15, 121]. In this review, we focused on several major as-
pects of bionanotechnology in which self-assembling peptides
have lead to significant improvements in regenerative medicine,
delivery of bioactive therapeutics, nanofabrication, and molecular
imaging.
References
1. Feynman R P (1960). There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom. AQ:
Please
provide
the
complete
details of
refer-
ence
1.
2. Goodsell D S (2004). Bionanotechnology: Lessons from Nature (New
Jersey: Wiley-Liss Inc).
3. Kyle S, Aggeli A, Ingham E, and McPherson M J (2009). Production
of Self-Assembling Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering, Trends inBiotechnology, 27, 423–433.
4. Zhang S G (2003). Fabrication of Novel Biomaterials through Molecular
Self-Assembly, Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1171–1178.
5. Kopecek J and Yang J (2009). Peptide-Directed Self-Assembly of
Hydrogels, Acta Biomaterialia, 5, 805–816.
6. Kelleher C M and Vacanti J P (2010). Engineering Extracellular Matrix
through Nanotechnology, Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / theRoyal Society, 7 (Suppl 6), S717–S729.
7. Prestwich G D (2007). Simplifying the Extracellular Matrix for 3-D
Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering: A Pragmatic Approach, Journal ofCellular Biochemistry, 101, 1370–1383.
8. Kokkoli E, Mardilovich A, Wedekind A, Rexeisen E L, Garg A, and Craig J
A (2006). Self-Assembly and Applications of Biomimetic and Bioactive
Peptide-Amphiphiles, Soft Matter, 2, 1015–1024.
9. Sun J, Zheng Q, Wu Y, Liu Y, Guo X, and Wu W (2010). Culture of
Nucleus Pulposus Cells from Intervertebral Disc on Self-Assembling
Kld-12 Peptide Hydrogel Scaffold, Materials Science and Engineering:C, 30, 975–980.
10. Mari-Buye N, Muinos M T F, and Semino C E (2010). Methods inBioengineering, ed (Berthiaume F. and M J. Massachussets: Artech
House).
11. Shastri V P (2009). In vivo Engineering of Tissues: Biological Con-
siderations, Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions, AdvancedMaterials, 21, 3246–3254.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
168 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
12. Hartgerink J D, Beniash E, and Stupp S I (2001). Self-Assembly and
Mineralization of Peptide-Amphiphile Nanofibers, Science, 294, 1684–
1688.
13. Tysseling-Mattiace V M, Sahni V, Niece K L, Birch D, Czeisler C, Fehlings
M G, Stupp S I, and Kessler J A (2008). Self-Assembling Nanofibers
Inhibit Glial Scar Formation and Promote Axon Elongation after Spinal
Cord Injury, The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3814–3823.
14. Silva G A, Czeisler C, Niece K L, Beniash E, Harrington D A, Kessler J
A, and Stupp S I (2004). Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor
Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers, Science, 303, 1352–1355.
15. Hauser C A E and Zhang S G (2010). Designer Self-Assembling Peptide
Nanofiber Biological Materials, Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 2780–
2790.
16. Zhang S, Holmes T, Lockshin C, and Rich A (1993). Spontaneous
Assembly of a Self-Complementary Oligopeptide to Form a Stable
Macroscopic Membrane, Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 90, 3334–3338.
17. Kisiday J, Jin M, Kurz B, Hung H, Semino C, Zhang S, and Grodzinsky
A J (2002). Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel Fosters Chondrocyte
Extracellular Matrix Production and Cell Division: Implications for
Cartilage Tissue Repair, Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 99, 9996–10001.
18. Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, and Zhang S (2007). Biological Designer
Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds Significantly Enhance
Osteoblast Proliferation, Differentiation and 3-D Migration, PloS One,
2, e190.
19. Semino C E, Merok J R, Crane G G, Panagiotakos G, and Zhang S (2003).
Functional Differentiation of Hepatocyte-Like Spheroid Structures
from Putative Liver Progenitor Cells in Three-Dimensional Peptide
Scaffolds, Differentiation: Research in Biological Diversity, 71, 262–270.
20. Ellis-Behnke R G, Liang Y X, You S W, Tay D K, Zhang S, So K F, and
Schneider G E (2006). Nano Neuro Knitting: Peptide Nanofiber Scaffold
for Brain Repair and Axon Regeneration with Functional Return of
Vision, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the UnitedStates of America, 103, 5054–5059.
21. Misawa H, Kobayashi N, Soto-Gutierrez A, Chen Y, Yoshida A, Rivas-
Carrillo J D, Navarro-Alvarez N, Tanaka K, Miki A, Takei J, Ueda T, Tanaka
M, Endo H, Tanaka N, and Ozaki T (2006). Puramatrix Facilitates Bone
Regeneration in Bone Defects of Calvaria in Mice, Cell Transplantation,
15, 903–910.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 169
22. Semino C E (2008). Self-Assembling Peptides: From Bio-Inspired
Materials to Bone Regeneration, Journal of Dental Research, 87, 606–
616.
23. Ozeki M, Kuroda S, Kon K, and Kasugai S (2011). Differentiation of
Bone Marrow Stromal Cells into Osteoblasts in a Self-Assembling
Peptide Hydrogel: In vitro and in vivo Studies, Journal of BiomaterialsApplications, 25, 663–684.
24. Sun J, Zheng Q, Wu Y, Liu Y, Guo X, and Wu W (2010). Biocompatibility
of KLD-12 Peptide Hydrogel as a Scaffold in Tissue Engineering of
Intervertebral Discs in Rabbits, Journal of Huazhong University ofScience and Technology. Medical sciences, 30, 173–177.
25. Ellis-Behnke R G, Liang Y X, Tay D K, Kau P W, Schneider G E, Zhang
S, Wu W, and So K F (2006). Nano Hemostat Solution: Immediate
Hemostasis at the Nanoscale, Nanomedicine : Nanotechnology, Biology,and Medicine, 2, 207–215.
26. Luo Z L, Wang S K, and Zhang S G (2011). Fabrication of Self-
Assembling D-Form Peptide Nanofiber Scaffold D-Eak16 for Rapid
Hemostasis, Biomaterials, 32, 2013–2020.
27. Aggeli A, Bell M, Boden N, Keen J N, Knowles P F, McLeish T C B,
Pitkeathly M, and Radford S E (1997). Responsive Gels Formed by
the Spontaneous Self-Assembly of Peptides into Polymeric Beta-Sheet
Tapes, Nature, 386, 259–262.
28. Aggeli A, Bell M, Carrick L M, Fishwick C W, Harding R, Mawer P J,
Radford S E, Strong A E, and Boden N (2003). Ph as a Trigger of Peptide
Beta-Sheet Self-Assembly and Reversible Switching between Nematic
and Isotropic Phases, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125,
9619–9628.
29. Ashley Firth A A, Julie L Burke, Xuebin Yang, and Jennifer Kirkham
(2006). Biomimetic Self-Assembling Peptides as Injectable Scaffolds
for Hard Tissue Engineering, Nanomedicine, 1, 189–199.
30. Kirkham J, Firth A, Vernals D, Boden N, Robinson C, Shore R C, Brookes
S J, and Aggeli A (2007). Self-Assembling Peptide Scaffolds Promote
Enamel Remineralization, Journal of Dental Research, 86, 426–430.
31. Yan C, Altunbas A, Yucel T, Nagarkar R P, Schneider J P, and Pochan D
J (2010). Injectable Solid Hydrogel: Mechanism of Shear-Thinning and
Immediate Recovery of Injectable B-Hairpin Peptide Hydrogels, SoftMatter, 6, 5143–5156.
32. Pochan D J, Schneider J P, Kretsinger J, Ozbas B, Rajagopal K, and Haines
L (2003). Thermally Reversible Hydrogels Via Intramolecular Folding
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
170 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
and Consequent Self-Assembly of a De Novo Designed Peptide, Journalof the American Chemical Society, 125, 11802–11803.
33. Bromley E H, Sessions R B, Thomson A R, and Woolfson D N (2009).
Designed Alpha-Helical Tectons for Constructing Multicomponent
Synthetic Biological Systems, Journal of the American Chemical Society,
131, 928–930.
34. Moutevelis E and Woolfson D N (2009). A Periodic Table of Coiled-Coil
Protein Structures, Journal of Molecular Biology, 385, 726–732.
35. Papapostolou D, Smith A M, Atkins E D, Oliver S J, Ryadnov M G,
Serpell L C, and Woolfson D N (2007). Engineering Nanoscale Order
into a Designed Protein Fiber, Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 104, 10853–10858.
36. Banwell E F, Abelardo E S, Adams D J, Birchall M A, Corrigan A, Donald
A M, Kirkland M, Serpell L C, Butler M F, and Woolfson D N (2009).
Rational Design and Application of Responsive Alpha-Helical Peptide
Hydrogels, Nature Materials, 8, 596–600.
37. Zhang S, Greenfield M A, Mata A, Palmer L C, Bitton R, Mantei J R,
Aparicio C, de la Cruz M O, and Stupp S I (2010). A Self-Assembly
Pathway to Aligned Monodomain Gels, Nature Materials, 9, 594–601.
38. Beniash E, Hartgerink J D, Storrie H, Stendahl J C, and Stupp S I
(2005). Self-Assembling Peptide Amphiphile Nanofiber Matrices for
Cell Entrapment, Acta Biomaterialia, 1, 387–397.
39. Jun H W, Yuwono V, Paramonov S E, and Hartgerink J D (2005).
Enzyme-Mediated Degradation of Peptide-Amphiphile Nanofiber Net-
works, Advanced Materials, 17, 2612–2617.
40. Yu Y C, Berndt P, Tirrell M, and Fields G B (1996). Self-Assembling
Amphiphiles for Construction of Protein Molecular Architecture,
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118, 12515–12520.
41. Gore T, Dori Y, Talmon Y, Tirrell M, and Bianco-Peled H (2001).
Self-Assembly of Model Collagen Peptide Amphiphiles, Langmuir, 17,
5352–5360.
42. Dori Y, Bianco-Peled H, Satija S K, Fields G B, McCarthy J B, and Tirrell
M (2000). Ligand Accessibility as Means to Control Cell Response
to Bioactive Bilayer Membranes, Journal of Biomedical MaterialsResearch, 50, 75–81.
43. Pakalns T, Haverstick K L, Fields G B, McCarthy J B, Mooradian D
L, and Tirrell M (1999). Cellular Recognition of Synthetic Peptide
Amphiphiles in Self-Assembled Monolayer Films, Biomaterials, 20,
2265–2279.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 171
44. Galler K M, Cavender A, Yuwono V, Dong H, Shi S T, Schmalz G,
Hartgerink J D, and D’Souza R N (2008). Self-Assembling Peptide
Amphiphile Nanofibers as a Scaffold for Dental Stem Cells, TissueEngineering Part A, 14, 2051–2058.
45. Brun P, Ghezzo F, Roso M, Danesin R, Palu G, Bagno A, Modesti
M, Castagliuolo I, and Dettin M (2011). Electrospun Scaffolds of
Self-Assembling Peptides with Poly(Ethylene Oxide) for Bone Tissue
Engineering, Acta Biomaterialia, 7(6), 2526–2532.
46. Hauser C A, Deng R, Mishra A, Loo Y, Khoe U, Zhuang F, Cheong D W,
Accardo A, Sullivan M B, Riekel C, Ying J Y, and Hauser U A (2011).
Natural Tri- to Hexapeptides Self-Assemble in Water to Amyloid
Beta-Type Fiber Aggregates by Unexpected Alpha-Helical Intermediate
Structures, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of theUnited States of America, 108, 1361–1366.
47. Mishra A, Loo Y, Deng R, Chuah Y J, Hee H T, Ying J Y, and Hauser
C A E (2011). Ultrasmall Natural Peptides Self-Assemble to Strong
Temperature-Resistant Helical Fibers in Scaffolds Suitable for Tissue
Engineering, Nano Today, In Press, Corrected Proof AU:
Please
update
refer-
ence
47.
48. Haider M, Megeed Z, and Ghandehari H (2004). Genetically Engineered
Polymers: Status and Prospects for Controlled Release, Journal ofControlled Release, 95, 1–26.
49. Megeed Z, Cappello J, and Ghandehari H (2002). Genetically Engi-
neered Silk-Elastinlike Protein Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery,
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54, 1075–1091.
50. Cappello J, Crissman J W, Crissman M, Ferrari F A, Textor G, Wallis
O, Whitledge J R, Zhou X, Burman D, Aukerman L, and Stedronsky
E R (1998). In-Situ Self-Assembling Protein Polymer Gel Systems for
Administration, Delivery, and Release of Drugs, Journal of ControlledRelease, 53, 105–117.
51. Dinerman A A, Cappello J, Ghandehari H, and Hoag S W (2002).
Swelling Behavior of a Genetically Engineered Silk-Elastinlike Protein
Polymer Hydrogel, Biomaterials, 23, 4203–4210.
52. Dinerman A A, Cappello J, Ghandehari H, and Hoag S W (2002). Solute
Diffusion in Genetically Engineered Silk-Elastinlike Protein Polymer
Hydrogels, Journal of Controlled Release, 82, 277–287.
53. Megeed Z, Haider M, Li D, O’Malley B W, Jr., Cappello J, and Ghandehari
H (2004). In vitro and in vivo Evaluation of Recombinant Silk-
Elastinlike Hydrogels for Cancer Gene Therapy, Journal of ControlledRelease, 94, 433–445.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
172 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
54. Nagarsekar A, Crissman J, Crissman M, Ferrari F, Cappello J, and Ghan-
dehari H (2003). Genetic Engineering of Stimuli-Sensitive Silkelastin-
Like Protein Block Copolymers, Biomacromolecules, 4, 602–607.
55. MacKay J A, Chen M, McDaniel J R, Liu W, Simnick A J, and Chilkoti A
(2009). Self-Assembling Chimeric Polypeptide-Doxorubicin Conjugate
Nanoparticles That Abolish Tumours after a Single Injection, NatureMaterials, 8, 993–999.
56. Wu Y, MacKay J A, McDaniel J R, Chilkoti A, and Clark R L
(2009). Fabrication of Elastin-Like Polypeptide Nanoparticles for Drug
Delivery by Electrospraying, Biomacromolecules, 10, 19–24.
57. McDaniel J R, Callahan D J, and Chilkoti A (2010). Drug Delivery to Solid
Tumors by Elastin-Like Polypeptides, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews,
62, 1456–1467.
58. Liu W, MacKay J A, Dreher M R, Chen M, McDaniel J R, Simnick A J, Calla-
han D J, Zalutsky M R, and Chilkoti A (2010). Injectable Intratumoral
Depot of Thermally Responsive Polypeptide-Radionuclide Conjugates
Delays Tumor Progression in a Mouse Model, Journal of ControlledRelease, 144, 2–9.
59. MacEwan S R and Chilkoti A (2010). Elastin-Like Polypeptides:
Biomedical Applications of Tunable Biopolymers, Biopolymers, 94, 60–
77.
60. Hassouneh W, Christensen T, and Chilkoti A (2010). Elastin-Like
Polypeptides as a Purification Tag for Recombinant Proteins, CurrentProtocols in Protein Science, Chapter: Unit 6.11.
61. Petka W A, Harden J L, McGrath K P, Wirtz D, and Tirrell D A (1998).
Reversible Hydrogels from Self-Assembling Artificial Proteins, Science,
281, 389–392.
62. Vandermeulen G W and Klok H A (2004). Peptide/Protein Hybrid
Materials: Enhanced Control of Structure and Improved Performance
through Conjugation of Biological and Synthetic Polymers, Macromole-cular Bioscience, 4, 383–398.
63. Wang C, Kopecek J, and Stewart R J (2001). Hybrid Hydrogels
Cross-Linked by Genetically Engineered Coiled-Coil Block Proteins,
Biomacromolecules, 2, 912–920.
64. Yang J, Xu C, Wang C, and Kopecek J (2006). Refolding Hydrogels Self-
Assembled from N -(2-Hydroxypropyl)Methacrylamide Graft Copoly-
mers by Antiparallel Coiled-Coil Formation, Biomacromolecules, 7,
1187–1195.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 173
65. Yamaguchi N and Kiick K L (2005). Polysaccharide-Poly(Ethylene
Glycol) Star Copolymer as a Scaffold for the Production of Bioactive
Hydrogels, Biomacromolecules, 6, 1921–1930.
66. Vandermeulen G W, Hinderberger D, Xu H, Sheiko S S, Jeschke G,
and Klok H A (2004). Structure and Dynamics of Self-Assembled
Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Based Coiled-Coil Nano-Objects, Chemphyschem,
5, 488–494.
67. Williams D A and Baum C (2003). Medicine. Gene Therapy–New
Challenges Ahead, Science, 302, 400–401.
68. Cavazzana-Calvo M, Thrasher A, and Mavilio F (2004). The Future of
Gene Therapy, Nature, 427, 779–781.
69. Nishikawa M and Huang L (2001). Nonviral Vectors in the New
Millennium: Delivery Barriers in Gene Transfer, Human Gene Therapy,
12, 861–870.
70. Thomas M and Klibanov A M (2003). Non-Viral Gene Therapy:
Polycation-Mediated DNA Delivery, Applied Microbiology and Biotech-nology, 62, 27–34.
71. Kay M A, Glorioso J C, and Naldini L (2001). Viral Vectors for
Gene Therapy: The Art of Turning Infectious Agents into Vehicles of
Therapeutics, Nature Medicine, 7, 33–40.
72. Walther W and Stein U (2000). Viral Vectors for Gene Transfer: A
Review of Their Use in the Treatment of Human Diseases, Drugs, 60,
249–271.
73. Romano G, Marino I R, Pentimalli F, Adamo V, and Giordano A (2009).
Insertional Mutagenesis and Development of Malignancies Induced by
Integrating Gene Delivery Systems: Implications for the Design of Safer
Gene-Based Interventions in Patients, Drug News & Perspectives, 22,
185–196.
74. Grgacic E V and Anderson D A (2006). Virus-Like Particles: Passport to
Immune Recognition, Methods, 40, 60–65.
75. Harro C D, Pang Y Y, Roden R B, Hildesheim A, Wang Z, Reynolds M J,
Mast T C, Robinson R, Murphy B R, Karron R A, Dillner J, Schiller J T, and
Lowy D R (2001). Safety and Immunogenicity Trial in Adult Volunteers
of a Human Papillomavirus 16 L1 Virus-Like Particle Vaccine, Journalof the National Cancer Institute, 93, 284–292.
76. Rudra J S, Tian Y F, Jung J P, and Collier J H (2010). A Self-Assembling
Peptide Acting as an Immune Adjuvant, Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 622–627.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
174 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
77. Madalinski K, Sylvan S P, Hellstrom U, Mikolajewicz J, Zembrzuska-
Sadkowska E, and Piontek E (2001). Antibody Responses to Pres
Components after Immunization of Children with Low Doses of
Biohepb, Vaccine, 20, 92–97.
78. Maurer P, Jennings G T, Willers J, Rohner F, Lindman Y, Roubicek K,
Renner W A, Muller P, and Bachmann M F (2005). A Therapeutic
Vaccine for Nicotine Dependence: Preclinical Efficacy, and Phase I
Safety and Immunogenicity, European Journal of Immunology, 35,
2031–2040.
79. Sommerdijk N A J M and With G d (2008). Biomimetic CaCO3
Mineralization Using Designer Molecules and Interfaces, ChemicalReviews, 108, 4499–4550.
80. Estroff L A (2008). Introduction: Biomineralization, Chemical Reviews,
108, 4329–4331.
81. Volkmer D, Fricke M, Huber T, and Sewald N (2004). Acidic Peptides
Acting as Growth Modifiers of Calcite Crystals, Chemical Communica-tions, 1872–1873.
82. Dickerson M B, Sandhage K H, and Naik R R (2008). Protein- and
Peptide-Directed Syntheses of Inorganic Materials, Chemical Reviews,
108, 4935–4978.
83. Cavalli S, Albericio F, and Kros A (2010). Amphiphilic Peptides and
Their Cross-Disciplinary Role as Building Blocks for Nanoscience,
Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 241–263.
84. Zhao X B, Pan F, Xu H, Yaseen M, Shan H H, Hauser C A E, Zhang S G, and
Lu J R (2010). Molecular Self-Assembly and Applications of Designer
Peptide Amphiphiles, Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 3480–3498.
85. Cavalli S, Popescu D C, Tellers E E, Vos M R J, Pichon B P, Overhand M,
Rapaport H, Sommerdijk N, and Kros A (2006). Self-Organizing Beta-
Sheet Lipopeptide Monolayers as Template for the Mineralization of
CaCO3, Angewandte Chemie — International Edition, 45, 739–744.
86. Weiner S and Wagner H D (1998). The Material Bone: Structure
Mechanical Function Relations, Annual Review of Materials Science, 28,
271–298.
87. Hung A M and Stupp S I (2007). Simultaneous Self-Assembly,
Orientation, and Patterning of Peptide-Amphiphile Nanofibers by Soft
Lithography, Nano Letters, 7, 1165–1171.
88. Daniel M-C and Astruc D (2003). Gold Nanoparticles: Assembly,
Supramolecular Chemistry, Quantum-Size-Related Properties, and
Applications toward Biology, Catalysis, and Nanotechnology, ChemicalReviews, 104, 293–346.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 175
89. Michalet X, Pinaud F F, Bentolila L A, Tsay J M, Doose S, Li J J, Sundaresan
G, Wu A M, Gambhir S S, and Weiss S (2005). Quantum Dots for Live
Cells, in vivo Imaging, and Diagnostics, Science, 307, 538–544.
90. Zhou Y, Kogiso M, He C, Shimizu Y, Koshizaki N, and Shimizu T
(2007). Fluorescent Nanotubes Consisting of CdS-Embedded Bilayer
Membranes of a Peptide Lipid, Advanced Materials, 19, 1055–1058.
91. Bekele H, Fendler J H, and Kelly J W (1999). Self-Assembling
Peptidomimetic Monolayer Nucleates Oriented CdS Nanocrystals,
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 121, 7266–7267.
92. Sone E D and Stupp S I (2004). Semiconductor-Encapsulated Peptide-
Amphiphile Nanofibers, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126,
12756–12757.
93. Li L S and Stupp S I (2005). One-Dimensional Assembly of Lipophilic
Inorganic Nanoparticles Templated by Peptide-Based Nanofibers with
Binding Functionalities, Angewandte Chemie — International Edition,
44, 1833–1836.
94. Slowing I I, Trewyn B G, Giri S, and Lin V S Y (2007). Mesoporous
Silica Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Biosensing Applications,
Advanced Functional Materials, 17, 1225–1236.
95. Meegan J E, Aggeli A, Boden N, Brydson R, Brown A P, Carrick L,
Brough A R, Hussain A, and Ansell R J (2004). Designed Self-Assembled
Beta-Sheet Peptide Fibrils as Templates for Silica Nanotubes, AdvancedFunctional Materials, 14, 31–37.
96. Yuwono V M and Hartgerink J D (2007). Peptide Amphiphile
Nanofibers Template and Catalyze Silica Nanotube Formation, Lang-muir, 23, 5033–5038.
97. Xu H, Wang Y M, Ge X, Han S Y, Wang S J, Zhou P, Shan H H, Zhao X
B, and Lu J A R (2010). Twisted Nanotubes Formed from Ultrashort
Amphiphilic Peptide I3k and Their Templating for the Fabrication of
Silica Nanotubes, Chemistry of Materials, 22, 5165–5173.
98. Weissleder R and Pittet M J (2008). Imaging in the Era of Molecular
Oncology, Nature, 452, 580–589.
99. Tanisaka H, Kizaka-Kondoh S, Makino A, Tanaka S, Hiraoka M, and
Kimura S (2008). Near-Infrared Fluorescent Labeled Peptosome for
Application to Cancer Imaging, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 19, 109–117.
100. Berti L, D’Agostino P S, Boeneman K, and Medintz I L (2009). Improved
Peptidyl Linkers for Self-Assembly of Semiconductor Quantum Dot
Bioconjugates, Nano Research, 2, 121–129.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
176 Applications in Bionanotechnology of Self-Assembled Peptide Nanostructures
101. Bull S R, Guler M O, Bras R E, Meade T J, and Stupp S I (2005).
Self-Assembled Peptide Amphiphile Nanofibers Conjugated to MRI
Contrast Agents, Nano Letters, 5, 1–4.
102. Accardo A, Tesauro D, Roscigno P, Gianolio E, Paduano L, D’Errico
G, Pedone C, and Morelli G (2004). Physicochemical Properties of
Mixed Micellar Aggregates Containing CCK Peptides and Gd Complexes
Designed as Tumor Specific Contrast Agents in MRI, Journal of theAmerican Chemical Society, 126, 3097–3107.
103. Hentschel J and Borner H G (2006). Peptide-Directed Microstructure
Formation of Polymers in Organic Media, Journal of the AmericanChemical Society, 128, 14142–14149.
104. Vintiloiu A and Leroux J C (2008). Organogels and Their Use in Drug
Delivery–a Review, Journal of Controlled Release, 125, 179–192.
105. Gronwald O and Shinkai S (2001). Sugar-Integrated Gelators of Organic
Solvents, Chemistry, 7, 4328–4334.
106. Lyon R P and Atkins W M (2001). Self-Assembly and Gelation of
Oxidized Glutathione in Organic Solvents, Journal of the AmericanChemical Society, 123, 4408–4413.
107. Banerjee A, Palui G, and Banerjee A (2008). Pentapeptide Based
Organogels: The Role of Adjacently Located Phenylalanine Residues in
Gel Formation, Soft Matter, 4, 1430–1437.
108. Jayakumar R, Murugesan M, Asokan C, and Aulice Scibioh M (2000).
Self-Assembly of a Peptide Boc-(Ile)5-Ome in Chloroform and N, N -
Dimethylformamide, Langmuir, 16, 1489–1496.
109. Yan X, Cui Y, He Q, Wang K, and Li J (2008). Organogels Based
on Self-Assembly of Diphenylalanine Peptide and Their Application
to Immobilize Quantum Dots, Chemistry of Materials, 20, 1522–
1526.
110. Palui G, Garai A, Nanda J, Nandi A K, and Banerjee A (2009).
Organogels from Different Self-Assembling New Dendritic Peptides:
Morphology, Rheology, and Structural Investigations, The Journal ofPhysical Chemistry B, 114, 1249–1256.
111. Hirst A R, Smith D K, Feiters M C, and Geurts H P M (2004).
Two-Component Dendritic Gel: Effect of Spacer Chain Length on the
Supramolecular Chiral Assembly, Langmuir, 20, 7070–7077.
112. Hirst A R, Smith D K, Feiters M C, Geurts H P M, and Wright A C (2003).
Two-Component Dendritic Gels: Easily Tunable Materials, Journal ofthe American Chemical Society, 125, 9010–9011.
April 19, 2012 18:17 PSP Book - 9in x 6in 06-Edith-Svendsen-c06
References 177
113. Love C S, Hirst A R, Chechik V, Smith D K, Ashworth I, and Brennan C
(2004). One-Component Gels Based on Peptidic Dendrimers: Dendritic
Effects on Materials Properties, Langmuir, 20, 6580–6585.
114. Partridge K S, Smith D K, Dykes G M, and McGrail P T (2001).
Supramolecular Dendritic Two-Component Gel, Chemical Communica-tions, 319–320.
115. Ji Y, Kuang G-C, Jia X-R, Chen E-Q, Wang B-B, Li W-S, Wei Y,
and Lei J (2007). Photoreversible Dendritic Organogel, ChemicalCommunications, 4233–4235.
116. Plourde F, Motulsky A, Couffin-Hoarau A C, Hoarau D, Ong H, and
Leroux J C (2005). First Report on the Efficacy of l-Alanine-Based insitu-Forming Implants for the Long-Term Parenteral Delivery of Drugs,
Journal of Controlled Release, 108, 433–441.
117. Couffin-Hoarau A C, Motulsky A, Delmas P, and Leroux J C (2004). In
Situ-Forming Pharmaceutical Organogels Based on the Self-Assembly
of l-Alanine Derivatives, Pharmaceutical Research, 21, 454–457.
118. Channon K J, Devlin G L, and MacPhee C E (2009). Efficient Energy
Transfer within Self-Assembling Peptide Fibers: A Route to Light-
Harvesting Nanomaterials, Journal of the American Chemical Society,
131, 12520–12521.
119. Hamley I W and Castelletto V (2007). Biological Soft Materials,
Angewandte Chemie — International Edition, 46, 4442–4455.
120. Langer R and Tirrell D A (2004). Designing Materials for Biology and
Medicine, Nature, 428, 487–492.
121. Lehn J M (2002). Toward Self-Organization and Complex Matter,
Science, 295, 2400–2403.