a new sesquiterpenoid from scaphium macropodum (miq.) beumee
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Universti Teknologi Mara], [N. Ahmat]On: 04 August 2014, At: 20:42Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Natural Product Research: FormerlyNatural Product LettersPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gnpl20
A new sesquiterpenoid from Scaphiummacropodum (Miq.) BeumeeL.M. Ramadhan Al Muqarrabuna, Norizan Ahmata, S. RuzainaS. Arisa, Nurdiana Shamsulrijala, Syarul N. Baharumb, RafidahAhmadb, A. Rifki Rosandyc, M. Nazip Suratmana & H. Takayamad
a Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM),40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysiab Institute of System Biology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia(UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysiac Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti KebangsaanMalaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysiad Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University,1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, JapanPublished online: 25 Feb 2014.
To cite this article: L.M. Ramadhan Al Muqarrabun, Norizan Ahmat, S. Ruzaina S. Aris,Nurdiana Shamsulrijal, Syarul N. Baharum, Rafidah Ahmad, A. Rifki Rosandy, M. NazipSuratman & H. Takayama (2014) A new sesquiterpenoid from Scaphium macropodum (Miq.)Beumee, Natural Product Research: Formerly Natural Product Letters, 28:9, 597-605, DOI:10.1080/14786419.2014.886211
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2014.886211
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to orarising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
A new sesquiterpenoid from Scaphium macropodum (Miq.) Beumee
L.M. Ramadhan Al Muqarrabuna, Norizan Ahmata*, S. Ruzaina S. Arisa,
Nurdiana Shamsulrijala, Syarul N. Baharumb, Rafidah Ahmadb, A. Rifki Rosandyc,
M. Nazip Suratmana and H. Takayamad
aFaculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia;bInstitute of System Biology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia;cFaculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia;dGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku,Chiba 263-8522, Japan
(Received 30 November 2013; final version received 19 January 2014)
A new sesquiterpenoid, malayscaphiol (1), and three known compounds, lupeol (2),lupenone (3) and stigmasterol (4), were isolated from the methanolic extract of the stembark of Scaphium macropodum. The structures of the isolated compounds weredetermined using several spectroscopic methods, including UV–vis, FT-IR, 1D and 2DNMR, and mass spectrometer. Major isolated compounds were assayed for cytotoxicityand anti-acetylcholinesterase activities. The chemotaxonomy significance of this plantwas also discussed.
Keywords: Sterculiaceae; Scaphium macropodum; sesquiterpenoid; malayscaphiol;cytotoxicity; anti-acetylcholinesterase
1. Introduction
Scaphium macropodum (Miq.) Beumee (Sterculiaceae), also known as malva nut (English) or
kembang semangkuk jantung (Malay), is a common emergent tree of tropical rain forests in
Malaya, Cambodia, Thailand, Sumatra and Borneo (Kochummen 1972). The mature tree attains
a stature of 40m. This plant undergoes defoliation in only a brief period of time and the flowers
grow on its bare twigs after defoliation (Kostermans 1953). This species is shortly deciduous and
flowers on bare twigs before the flush of new leaves. It changes its leaf shape and crown form
conspicuously with tree size. It is very likely that these dramatic ontogenic changes are related to
the plant growth and survival (Yamada & Suzuki 1996). The dispersal distance of the fruit
seldom exceeds 50m from the base of the parent tree (Yamada & Suzuki 1997).
S. macropodum has been reported to possess some medicinal properties. The seed forms a
large quantity of gelatine which can be used to treat intestinal infections, diarrhoea, throat aches,
asthma, dysentery, fever, coughs, inflammation and urinary illness (Lim 2012). In China, it is
also used as a traditional drug to prevent pharyngitis and also to treat tussis and constipation.
Malva nut also has cooling properties (Lamxay 2001). However, the chemical constituents and
pharmacology of this species have not been studied.
This paper describes the isolation and detailed characterisation of a new sesquiterpenoid,
malayscaphiol (1). The cytotoxicity against two cancer cell lines, HT-29 and MDA-MB, and
normal cell line 3T3, and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities of the isolated compounds are also
discussed.
q 2014 Taylor & Francis
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Natural Product Research, 2014
Vol. 28, No. 9, 597–605, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2014.886211
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Structure determination of malayscaphiol
The methanolic extract of the stem bark of S. macropodum was fractionated using vacuum liquid
chromatography (VLC) and purified using radial chromatography (RC) and recrystallisation.
Four compounds (1–4) were isolated (Figure 1), including a new sesquiterpenoid named
malayscaphiol (1). The structure elucidation of the compounds was conducted using several
spectroscopic methods including mass spectrometer, UV–vis, FT-IR, 1D and 2D NMR (HMQC,
HMBC, COSY and NOESY) and by comparison with reported data.
Compound 1, isolated as a pale yellow amorphous solid, is a new sesquiterpenoid derivative
isolated from plant for the first time. The molecular formula is C15H14O5, generated using HR-
ESI-MS [M þ H]þ at m/z 275.0978 (calc. for C15H15O5 275.09195). The UV spectrum displays
several absorbance peaks at 203, 233, 256 and 324 nm indicating the occurrence of a conjugated
system of double bonds as aromatic ring in the molecule. The FT-IR spectral data display a broad
absorbance peak at 3435 cm21 representing the stretching vibration of OZH bond. The Csp3–H
stretching bands appear at 2962, 2926 and 2850 cm21. Carbon–carbon double bond is detected
in this compound shown by an absorbance peak of symmetrical stretching CvC at 1643 cm21.
The presence of carbonyl group is characterised by several absorbance bands, i.e. CvO stretch
at 1734 cm21 while a band at 1262 cm21 indicates that the carbonyl is a ketone group. Bending
C–O at 1032 cm21 represents the hydroxyl. A conjugated system of double bonds is indicated
by a peak at 1557 cm21.
The attached proton test spectrum reveals that the compound contains 15 carbons consisting
of three methyls, one methylene, two methines and nine quaternary carbons. The most highly
deshielded signal at dC 193.7 (C-4) integrating for two carbons is attributed to two ketone
groups. The methylene group at dC 72.4 (C-2) indicates an oxygenated methylene. Two signals
at dC 155.4 (C-4) and 116.9 (C-3) provide information of the presence of an aliphatic double
bond in the structure, while the other six highly deshielded carbons represent the existence of an
aromatic ring in the molecule. In the aromatic ring, three carbons (C-6, C-7 and C-9) are
oxygenated carbons. The double bond equivalent value of C15H14O5 is 9, indicating that the
compound consists of six double bonds (four olefinics and two carbonyls) and three rings.
According to the 1H NMR spectrum, the oxygenated methylene protons, H-2eq (dH 4.60, dd,
J ¼ 5.1 and 10.8 Hz) and H-2axi (dH 4.19, dd, J ¼ 10.4 and 10.8Hz) are double doublet,
Figure 1. Compounds isolated from the stem bark of S. macropodum.
598 L.M.R. Al Muqarrabun et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
indicating that C-2 is adjacent to a methine group (C-3). This C-3 binds a doublet methyl group
(C-14), making the multiplicity of the H-3 multiplet. The other two methyl proton signals (H-15
and H-16) are singlets, showing that they are attached to olefinic quarternary carbons,
considering their high chemical shifts (H-15 ¼ 2.23, H-16 ¼ 2.40). One singlet olefinic proton
is detected at dH 6.36 (H-12).
The structure is confirmed using 2D NMR. The HMBC experiment shows 2J couplings
between H-2 (H-2axi and H-2eq) and C-3 besides 2J couplings between H-2 and C-4, C-9 and
C-14, thus confirming the position of carbonyl (C-4) and C-14. The other methyl, H-15, has
correlations with C-13 and the sole olefinic methine (C-12), while H-16 generates 2J couplings
with C-8 and 3J couplings with C-7 and C-9. Correlation between H-12 and C-5 also appears in
the HMBC spectrum. In the COSY spectrum, H-3 shows strong 3J couplings with H-2 and H-14,
while a long range 4J coupling also appears between H-12 and H-15 (Figure 2(a)).
The relative configuration of the sole chiral carbon (C-3)was observed usingNuclearOverhauser
Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY) experiment which describes the H–H correlation through space
(Figure 2(b)). In the NOESY spectrum, correlation was observed between two geminal protons of
aliphatic methylene C-2 (H-2eq and H-2ax). Carbon C-2 binds two protons, i.e. H-2ax and H-2eq.
Since both of the protons are double doublets and are in geminal position, they have two coupling
constants each, which are 10.4 and 10.8Hz for H-2ax and 5.1 and 10.8 for H-2eq. According to
Silverstein et al. (2005), the vicinal coupling constant between an axial Hwith another axialH ranges
from6 to10Hz,while the vicinal couplingconstantbetween an equatorialHwith an axialH is around
0–5Hz. Thus, the proton with coupling constants of 10.4Hz and 10.8Hz (H-2ax) is the one in the
axial position. H-2ax and H-2eq are coupled with J of 10.8Hz. In the NOESY spectrum, H-2axgenerates cross peak with H-3, whichmeans they are in the same orientation, i.e. axial, confirmed by
theother JofH-2ax (10.4Hz), indicating thatH-2ax is in eclipse position (dihedral angle of 08) towardsH-3 according to Karplus curve, thus placing C-14 in the equatorial position.
The plausible biogenesis of this compound is proposed in this paper (Figure 3). As a
sesquiterpenoid derivative, malayscaphiol is suspected to be synthesised via the mevalonate
pathway. An isopentenylpyrophosphate reacts with its allyl isomer, dimethylallylpyrophosphate
(DMAPP), to form geranyl pyrophosphate which then undergoes a series of reactions including
hydroxylation, deprotonation, cyclisation, reduction and oxidation reactions to form A. Another
DMAPP which has undergone a rearrangement reaction to become B then reacts with A in a
condensation reaction. The reaction to form compound 1 occurs in several steps from
hydroxylation, oxidation, cyclisation and reduction (aromatisation) reaction.
2.2. Chemotaxonomy significance
There have been many reports regarding the phytochemical studies of the species from the
family Sterculiaceae. Various classes of compounds including alkaloids, phenyl propanoids,
flavonoids and terpenoids have been successfully isolated and identified from several genera,
such as Melochia, Waltheria, Heisteria, Sterculia, Theobroma, Mansonia and Pterospermum
(Jalal & Collin 1977; Bhakuni et al. 1987; Hammerstone et al. 1994; El-Seedi et al. 1999;
Figure 2. Malayscaphiol 2D correlation NMR; (a) HMBC ( ) and COSY ( ), (b) NOESY.
Natural Product Research 599
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
Tiew et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2003; Dias et al. 2007; Dixit et al. 2011). Up until now, this
research is the first to cover the phytochemical investigation of the genus Scaphium. In this
study, a new three-ringed sesquiterpenoid named malayscaphiol was obtained from the stem
bark of S. macropodum. The occurrence of sesquiterpenoid in this family is not something new.
A handful of sesquiterpenoids were also reported from other genera. Tiew et al. (2003) managed
to isolate sesquiterpenoid mansonone C, E, G, H, R and S from the heartwood of Mansonia
gagei. In 2006, Chen, Tang, Lou and Zhao and his colleagues identified mansonone F, M, and
mansonone H methyl ester from the root bark of Helicteres angustifolia. The heartwood of
Heritiera ornithocephala was reported to contain 7-hydroxycalamenene, 8-hydroxy-
2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2,7,11,11-tetramethyl-1-benzox-epin-4-one and a sesquiterpen dimer, 8-bis
(7-hydroxycalamenene) (Cambie et al. 1990). Since only these four genera were reported to
Figure 3. Plausible biogenetic pathway of malayscaphiol.
600 L.M.R. Al Muqarrabun et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
biologically synthesise sesquiterpenoids, thus chemotaxonomically, it can be assumed that the
genus Scaphium is related to genera Mansonia, Helicteres and Heritiera. In addition,
S. macropodum can be suspected to have a closer relationship with genus Helicteres as the other
reported three-ringed sesquiterpenoids were all reported from Helicteres angustifolia.
2.3. Biological activity
Triterpene compounds have been reported to have potent cytotoxicity against several cancer cell
lines (Gao et al. 2002; Kuzuhara et al. 2006; Joshi et al. 2013). In this study, three triterpenes
isolated from this plant (2, 3 and 4) were assayed for anti-cancer activity against human
colorectal cancer (HT-29) and mammary breast cancer (MDA-MB) cell lines. Their toxicity
towards normal cell was also tested against 3T3 cell line. Compound 1 could not be tested due to
insufficient amount of the compound. The activity was observed as percentage of cell viability
after being treated with the tested compounds for 72 h with doxorubicin used as positive control
in the experiment.
The results indicated that all the tested compounds exhibited weak cytotoxic property against
HT-29 and MDA-MB cancer cell lines. Compound 2 demonstrated the strongest cytotoxicity
against HT-29 cells amongst the tested compounds with IC50 of 44.82mg/mL, while 3 showed
the strongest activity against MDA-MB cells with IC50 of 30.80mg/mL. Of all the tested
compounds, only 2 showed toxicity against normal cell line 3T3 with IC50 of 38.92mg/mL,
while the other compounds did not demonstrate any significant toxicity towards the cells,
indicated by IC50 of .100mg/mL. The cytotoxicity of the tested compounds was significantly
weaker than that of doxorubicin (IC50 ¼ 0.02mg/mL against HT-29, IC50 ¼ 0.05mg/mL against
MDA-MB).
Two isolated triterpenes were tested for anti-acetylcholinesterase (anti-AChE) activity, i.e. 2and 3. Among the isolated compounds, only the aforementioned compounds were able to be
dissolved in the mixture of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO, solvent) and the buffer used for this
test. The anti-AChE activities of the compounds are presented as percent inhibition. The results
showed that the three compounds exhibited similar activities. They did not display any anti-
AChE activity at concentrations of 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500mg/mL. It was only when the
concentration of the compounds was 1000mg/mL that they showed some activities. Compounds
2 and 3 demonstrated similar anti-AChE activities with IC50 of 977.23 and 954.99mg/mL,
respectively. Compared with positive control used, tacrine (IC50 ¼ 25.12mg/mL), the
compounds were considered to be not active in inhibiting the activity of AChE.
3. Experimental
3.1. General experimental procedures
The spectrophotometer instruments used in this research were Perkin-Elmer Lambda 35 UV-Vis
(Waltham, MA, USA), Perkin-Elmer FT-IR (Waltham, MA, USA), Bruker NMR (Billerica,
MA, USA) 300MHz for 1H and 75MHz for 13C, and Agilent Technologies GC-MS (Santa
Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation and purification were conducted using the
following adsorbents: silica gel 60 PF254 (Merck catalogue number: 1.07747.2500) for VLC,
silica gel 60 PF254 containing gypsum (Merck catalogue number: 1.07749.1000) for RC, silica
gel 60 (0.040–0.063mm) (Merck catalogue number: 1.09385.1000) for column chromatog-
raphy (CC) and silica gel 60 (0.2–0.5mm) (Merck catalogue number: 1.07733.1000) for the
sample. For thin layer chromatography, silica gel 60 PF254 (aluminium sheets) (Merck catalogue
number: 1.05554.0001) was used for analysis.
Natural Product Research 601
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
3.2. Plant materials
The sample used in this research was the stem bark of S. macropodum which was collected from
Mount Ledang, Johor National Park, Johor, Malaysia. The plant sample was identified by a
botanist at the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) and a voucher specimen has been
deposited in the Herbarium of FRIM with voucher number FRI 56479.
3.3. Isolation and purification
The ground, air-dried stem bark of S. macropodum (3.75 kg) was extracted for 3 days with 10 L
of MeOH at room temperature. This extraction step was repeated five times. The methanol
extract was concentrated at 508C with rotary evaporator under reduced pressure to give 100 g of
dark-brown crude extract. The tannins were separated by dissolving the crude extract in MeOH
and then fractionating it with diethylether. The ether fraction was then concentrated again to give
35 g of tannin-less crude extract.
The crude extract was subjected to VLC with column diameter of 17 cm and eluted with the
mixtures of n-hexane and EtOAc with increasing polarity (starting with n-hexane–EtOAc, 9.5:
0.5) to give five fractions (fractions 1–5). A white yellow solid was formed during the VLC. The
solid was washed with acetone to give 2 (91mg). Fraction 2 (21 g) was subjected to VLC with
n-hexane and the polarity was increased using EtOAc (starting with n-hexane–EtOAc, 9.75:
0.25) to give eight fractions (fractions 2.1–2.8). Fractions 2.4–2.7 were combined and washed
with acetone to give 2 (13 g). Fraction 2.2 (3 g) was subjected to RC with the solvent system of
n-hexane–EtOAc (9.9:0.1) to give seven fractions (fractions 2.2.1–2.2.7). Fraction 2.2.3
(297mg) was purified using RC with n-hexane–EtOAc (9.9: 0.1) to give 3 (20mg).
Fraction 3 (6.7 g) was subjected to VLC using the n-hexane–EtOAc solvent system with
increasing polarity to give six fractions (3.1–3.6). Fraction 3.4 (268.3mg) was purified using RC
with n-hexane–EtOAc–CHCl3 (8:1:1) to give 4 (5mg). Fraction 3.6 was washed with acetone to
remove the chlorophyll and then subjected to RC using the same solvent system with 3.4 to give
additional 4 (21mg). Fraction 4 (0.9 g) was subjected to CC with sephadex as the stationary
phase and eluted with MeOH to separate the chlorophyll. The chlorophyll-less fraction was
subjected to RC with n-hexane–EtOAc–CHCl3 (7:2:1) for purification to give six fractions
(4.1–4.6). Fraction 4.3 (35mg) was purified further using RC with the same solvent system to
give 1 (4.2mg).
Malayscaphiol (1). Pale yellow amorphous solid. HR-ESI-MS [M þ H]þ at m/z: 275.0978
(calc. for C15H15O5 275.09195). IR ῡmax (KBr disc) cm21: 3435, 2962, 2926, 2850, 1734, 1643,
1557, 1262, 1032. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300MHz): dH 4.60 (1H, dd, J ¼ 5.1, 10.8Hz, H-2a), 4.19
(1H, dd, J ¼ 10.4, 10.8 Hz, H-2b), 2.81 (1H, m, H-3), 6.36 (1H, s, H-12), 1.30 (3H,
d, J ¼ 2.4Hz, H-14), 2.23 (3H, s, H-15), 2.40 (3H, s, H-16). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75MHz): dC72.4 (C-2), 42.2 (C-3), 193.7 (C-4), 158.9 (C-5), 139.3 (C-6), 147.4 (C-7), 116.92 (C-8),
161.1 (C-9), 117.2 (C-10), 193.7 (C-11), 116.94 (C-12), 155.4 (C-13), 12.5 (C-14), 23.5 (C-15),
8.6 (C-16).
3.4. Cytotoxicity
3.4.1. Cell lines and cell culture condition
Cancer cell lines, HT29 (colon colorectal adenocar, ATCC HTB-38) and MDAMB (mammary
gland/breast, ATCC HTB-26), were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Sigma), supplemented with 10%
of foetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Laboratories) and 1% of penicillin/streptomycin. The normal
cell line, 3T3 (mus musculus embryo, ATCC CRL-1658) was maintained in DMEM (PAA
Laboratories), supplemented with 10% of foetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Laboratories) and 1%
of penicillin/streptomycin. The number of cells was counted by a haematocytometer, and the
602 L.M.R. Al Muqarrabun et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
viability of cells was determined using trypan blue reagent. Cells of 80–85% confluence were
harvested and plated onto 96 flat-bottomed well plates for experimental use. In all experiments,
the cells were incubated in a CO2 incubator at 378C with 5% CO2 overnight prior to treatment.
3.4.2. Cell viability assay: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide
(MTT) assay
Stock solutions of 10mg/mL were made in DMSO and serial dilutions were made in culture
media prior to use. The final concentrations of DMSO did not exceed 0.1% (v/v), a concentration
which is non-toxic to the cells (Li et al. 2007). The cells treated with extracts, fractions and pure
compounds (0.01–100mg/mL) were incubated for 72 h after which the MTT assay was carried
out as described by Mosmann (1983), but with slight modifications. After 72 h, supernatants
were discarded and 50mL of MTT stock solution (5mg/mL) was added to each well and the
plates were further incubated for 4 h. DMSO (100mL) was added to each well to solubilise
the water-insoluble purple formazan crystals. The amount of MTT–formazan is directly
proportional to the number of living cells and was determined by measuring the optical density
(OD) at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan). The percentage of cytotoxic activity
compared with the untreated cells was determined using the following equation:
Cell viability ¼ ODof treated cell
OD of control cell£ 100%:
Data generated were used to plot a dose response curve. Cytotoxic activity was expressed as
the mean concentration of the test sample required to kill 50% of the cell population. The
selectivity index (SI) of the extracts is defined as the ratio of cytotoxicity on normal cells to
cancer cells. Low SI indicates that the cytotoxic activity is probably due to cytotoxicity rather
than activity against the cancerous cells themselves (Saetung et al. 2005). In contrast, high SI
should offer the potential of safer therapy. Doxorubicin was used as the positive reference in this
study.
3.5. Anti-AChE activity
AChE and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities were assessed by slightly modifying the
spectrophotometric method developed by Ellman et al. (1961). Electric eel AChE was used,
while acetylthiocholine iodide was employed as substrates of the reaction. Briefly, 125mL of
5,5’-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) (50mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.1M sodium chloride,
0.02M MgCl2·6H2O), 25mL of AChE (0.2U/mL in buffer), 25mL of test solution (samples
were dissolved in DMSO) and 50mL of buffer (50mM Tris–HCl, pH 8, 0.1% BSA) were mixed
and incubated for 30min at 258C. For controls, test solutions were replaced by the correspondingvolume of DMSO or buffer. The reaction was then initiated by the addition of 25mL of
acetylthiocholine iodide (0.25mmol/L) or the final volume was 250mL. The hydrolyses of thesesubstrates were monitored spectrophotometrically by the formation of yellow 5-thio-2-
nitrobenzoate anion, as the result of enzyme-catalysed reaction of DTNB with thiocholine,
released by the enzymatic hydrolysis of acetylthiocholine iodide, using a 96-well microplate
reader (Model 680, Biorad, USA) at a wavelength of 412 nm. The rates of the reaction were
obtained over 180 s, with a 20 s interval. Percentage of inhibition of AChE was determined by
comparison of the reaction rates of the samples relative to blank sample (DMSO in Tris–HCl
buffer, pH 8.0) using the formula (E2S)/E £ 100, where E is the activity of enzyme without test
sample, and S is the activity of enzyme with test sample. The experiments were carried out in
triplicate. Tacrine was used as reference compound.
Natural Product Research 603
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
4. Conclusions
The phytochemical investigation of the stem bark of S. macropodum (Miq.) Beumee resulted in
the isolation of a new sesquiterpenoid named malayscaphiol (1) along with three known
compounds including lupeol (2), lupenone (3) and stigmasterol (4). Compounds 2, 3 and 4
exhibited weak cytotoxicity towards HT-29 and MDA-MB cell lines. Compounds 2 and 3 did
not display anti-acetylcholinesterase activity.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material relating to this article is available online, alongside Figure S1,
Tables S1 and S2 are available online.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA for financingthis research project.
References
Bhakuni RS, Shukla YN, Thakur RS. 1987. Cyclopeptide alkaloids from Melochia corchorifolia. Phytochemistry.
26:324–325.
Cambie RC, Lal AR, Ahmad F. 1990. Sesquiterpenes from Heritiera ornithocephala. Phytochemistry. 29:2329–2331.
Chen W, Tang W, Lou L, Zhao W. 2006. Pregnane, coumarin and lupane derivatives and cytotoxic constituents from
Helicteres angustifolia. Phytochemistry. 67:1041–1047.
Dias GCD, Gressler V, Hoenzel SCSM, Silva UF, Dalcol II, Morel AF. 2007. Constituents of the roots of Melochia
chamaedrys. Phytochemistry. 68:668–672.
Dixit P, Khan MP, Swarnkar G, Chattopadhyay N, Maurya R. 2011. Osteogenic constituents from Pterospermum
acerifolium Willd. flowers. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 21:4617–4621.
El-Seedi HR, Gohil S, Perera P, Torssell KBG, Bohlin L. 1999. Cyclopeptide alkaloids from Heisteria nitida.
Phytochemistry. 52:1739–1744.
Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Featherstone RM. 1961. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of
acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 7:88–95.
Gao JJ, Min BS, Ahn EM, Nakamura N, Lee HK, Hattori M. 2002. New triterpene aldehydes, lucialdehydes A—C, from
Ganoderma lucidum and their cytotoxicity against murine and human tumor cells. Chem Pharm Bull.
50:837–840.
Hammerstone JF, Romanczyk LJ, Aitken WM. 1994. Purine alkaloid distribution within Herrania and Theobroma.
Phytochemistry. 35:1237–1240.
Jalal MAF, Collin HA. 1977. Polyphenols of mature plant, seedling and tissue cultures of Theobroma cacao.
Phytochemistry. 16:1377–1380.
Joshi R, Sood S, Dogra P, Mahendru M, Kumar D, Bhangalia S, Pal HC, Kumar N, Bhushan S, Gulati A, et al. 2013.
In vitro cytotoxicity, antimicrobial, and metal-chelating activity of triterpene saponins from tea seed grown in
Kangra valley, India. Med Chem Res. 22:4030–4038.
Kochummen KM. 1972. Sterculiaceae. In: Tree flora of Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: Longman; p. 353–382.
Kostermans AJGH. 1953. The genera Scaphium Schott and Endl. & Hidegranlia Schott and Endl. (Sterculiaceae). J Sci
Res Indonesia. 2:13–23.
Kuzuhara H, Nishiyama S, Minowa N, Sasaki K. 2006. Effects of triterpene compounds on cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and
immune response in cultured cells. J Nat Med. 60:113–120.
Lamxay V. 2001. Important non-timber forest products of Lao PDR. Vientiane: Forest Research Center.
Li YL, Gan GP, Zhang HZ, Li CL, Huang YP, Liu YW, Liu JW. 2007. A flavonoid glycoside isolated from Smilax china
L. rhizomes in vitro anticancer effects on human cancer cell lines. J Ethnopharmacol. 113:115–124.
Lim TK. 2012. Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mosmann T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity
assays. J Immunol Methods. 65:55–63.
Saetung A, Itharat A, DechsukumC,Wattanapiromsakul C, Keawpradub N, Ratanasuwa P. 2005. Cytotoxicity activity of
Thai medicinal plants for cancer treatment. J Sci Technol. 27:469–478.
Silverstein RM,Webster FX, Kiemle DJ. 2005. Spectrometric identification of organic compounds. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ:
Wiley.
604 L.M.R. Al Muqarrabun et al.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4
Tiew P, Takayama H, Kitajima M, Aimi N, Kokpola U, Chavasiri W. 2003. A novel neolignan, mansoxetane, and two
new sesquiterpenes, mansonones R and S, from Mansonia gagei. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:6759–6761.
Wang RF, Yang XW, Ma CM, Shang MY, Liang JY, Wang X, Cai SQ, Shoyama Y. 2003. Alkaloids from the seeds of
Sterculia lychnophora (Pangdahai). Phytochemistry. 63:475–478.
Yamada T, Suzuki E. 1996. Ontogenic change in leaf shape and crown form of a tropical tree, Scaphium macropodum
(Sterculiaceae) in Borneo. J Plant Res. 109:211–217.
Yamada T, Suzuki E. 1997. Change in spatial distribution during the life history of a tropical tree species, Scaphium
macropodum (Sterculiaceae) in Borneo. J Plant Res. 110:179–186.
Natural Product Research 605
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ti T
ekno
logi
Mar
a], [
N. A
hmat
] at
20:
42 0
4 A
ugus
t 201
4