1 city council special meeting monday, march 21, 2022 5:00

1

City Council Special Meeting

Monday, March 21, 2022 5:00 PM

Council Chambers & Virtual AMENDED

Amended items appear below in RED

Pursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged.

HOW TO PARTICIPATE

VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION

CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238) Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833

The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and s t r e a m ed t o Midpen Media Center at https://midpenmedia.org.

TIME ESTIMATES Time estimates are provided as part of the Council's effort to manage its time at Council meetings. Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public.

PUBLIC COMMENTS Public Comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom meeting. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to [email protected] and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your email subject line.

CALL TO ORDER

SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (5:00 - 5:20 PM)

1. Tokyo Paralympics Gold Medal Winner Palo Alto ResidentKatie Holloway Bridge

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB361

https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238

https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto

https://midpenmedia.org/

mailto:[email protected]

2 Special Meeting March 21, 2022

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org.

AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT (5:20 - 5:35 PM) Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. Council reserves the right to limit the duration of Oral Communications period to 30 minutes.

CONSENT CALENDAR (5:35 - 5:40 PM) Items will be voted on in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members.

2. Approve Minutes from the March 7, 2022 City Council Meeting

3. Approval of a Construction Contract With Casey Construction, Inc. forSewer Lateral Installation, Repair and Replacement and WastewaterCollection System Rehabilitation in a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of$2,998,266 for a Three-Year Term Through June 2025

4. Authorize Transmittal of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan AnnualProgress Report to the Office of Planning and Research and the 2021Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the Department ofHousing and Community Development

5. Accept the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Annual Reportfor Fiscal Year 2020-2021 and Find the SUMC Parties in ComplianceWith the Development Agreement

6. Approval of Task Order Construction Contract C22183580 With MPNexlevel of California, Inc. in the Amount not to exceed $8,815,809for Trenching and Substructure Installation and Materials;Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Relatedbut Unforeseen Change Orders Not-to-Exceed $881,581, for a TotalNot-to-Exceed Amount of $9,697,390 Over Three Years

7. Approval of Construction Contract C22184073 with O'Grady PavingInc. in the Amount of $1,200,234, and Authorization for the CityManager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Ordersfor Related Additional but Unforeseen Work that May Develop Duringthe Project Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $118,523, for the FiscalYear 2022 Asphalt Paving, Capital Improvements Program Projects PE-86070, PO-12001, PL-04010 and PO-89003

8. Approval of Amendment Number One to Contract C19173550 withAccela, Inc. to add the Accela Mobile Office and Accela ElectronicReporting Database Modules to this Online Services Contract, and toIncrease the Compensation by an Amount Not-To-Exceed $57,210 fora New Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $848,554

Q & A

http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/council-questions/20220321cqccs.pdf

3 Special Meeting March 21, 2022

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org.

9. Direct Staff to Relinquish S. Palo Alto Bikeways Project Grant UnderOBAG2 and Reapply Under OBAG3 in May, 2022 to Allow For AdditionalTime to Meet Project Outreach, Design, and CEQA Requirements

ACTION ITEMS Include: Reports of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Reports of Officials, Unfinished Business and Council Matters.

10. Adoption of an Interim Ordinance Establishing Objective Urban LotSplit Standards and Further Refinements to SB 9 DevelopmentStandards; Authorizing the Public Works Director to Publish ObjectiveStandards Regarding Adjacent Improvements Related to SB 9Projects; and Direction Regarding Listing Properties Eligible for HistoricStatus. (6:00 PM – 7:45 PM) Supplemental Memo Added

11. Approve the Housing Element Working Group and Planning andTransportation Commission Recommendations for the 2023-31Housing Element Sites and Their Associated Unit Yields as Well asPotential Feedback on Housing Element Policies and Programs, orOther Housing-Related Direction to Staff.(7:45 PM – 9:45 PM) Late Packet Report Added

COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)

ADJOURNMENT

INFORMATION REPORTS Information reports are provided for informational purposes only to the Council and the public but are not listed for action during this meeting’s agenda.

12. Rental Residential Vacancy Rate Determination for Three Plus DwellingUnits for Calendar Year 2021

OTHER INFORMATION • Standing Committee Meeting- Canceled Finance Committee 3/15• Schedule of Meetings• Public Letters to Council

Public Letters

Public Letters

Public Letters

Presentation

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS (5:40 - 6:00 PM) Presentation

Presentation


https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/public-comment/20220321-cc.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/public-comment/20220321-cc-tem-11.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/public-comment/20220321-cc-item-9.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/public-comment/20220321-cc-item-10.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/item-presentations/2022/20220321/item-11.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/council-questions/20220321cqccs_1.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/item-presentations/2022/20220321/20220321pptccs-item-10.pdf

4 Special Meeting March 21, 2022 Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for

public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org.

AMENDED AGEND ITEMS Items that have been added/modified from the original publication of the agenda are listed below. Any corresponding materials are appended to the end of the initial packet. If full items have been added to the Agenda, they will be denoted with a number staring with AA, meaning Amended Agenda item.

10. Adoption of an Interim Ordinance Establishing Objective Urban Lot Split Standards and Further Refinements to SB 9 Development Standards; Authorizing the Public Works Director to Publish Objective Standards Regarding Adjacent Improvements Related to SB 9 Projects; and Direction Regarding Listing Properties Eligible for Historic Status. (6:00 PM – 7:45 PM) Supplemental Memo Added

11. Approve the Housing Element Working Group and Planning and Transportation Commission Recommendations for the 2023-31 Housing Element Sites and Their Associated Unit Yields as Well as Potential Feedback on Housing Element Policies and Programs, or Other Housing-Related Direction to Staff. (7:45 PM – 9:45 PM) Late Packet Report Added


5 Special Meeting March 21, 2022 Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for

public inspection at www.CityofPaloAlto.org.

PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to

[email protected].

2. Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. A. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in-

browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer.

B. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak.

C. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.

D. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. E. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your

comments.

3. Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B-E above.

4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833



https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238

City of Palo Alto (ID # 14109)

Office of the City Clerk City Council CAO Report

Meeting Date: 3/21/2022

Title: Approve Minutes from the March 7, 2022 City Council Meeting

From: Lesley Milton, City Clerk

Staff recommends Council to review and approve the minutes as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

• Attachment2.a: Attachment A: 20220307amCCs Draft (PDF)

2

Packet Pg. 5

CITY COUNCIL

DRAFT ACTION MINUTES

Page 1 of 3

Special Meeting March 07, 2022

The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 5:00 P.M.

Present: Burt, Cormack, DuBois, Filseth, Kou, Stone, Tanaka

Absent: None

Closed Session

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS City Designated Representatives: City Manager and his Designees Pursuant to Merit System Rules and Regulations (Ed Shikada, Kiely Nose, Rumi Portillo, Sandra Blanch, Nicholas Raisch, Tori Anthony, Molly Stump, and Terence Howzell) Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union, (SEIU) Local 521, Utilities Management and Professional Association of Palo Alto (UMPAPA)Palo Alto Peace Officers’ Association (PAPOA), Palo Alto Police Management Association (PMA), International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) local 1319, Palo Alto Fire Chiefs Association (FCA), Management and Professional Employees (MGMT) ; Authority: Government Code Section 54957.6 (a).

MOTION: Council Member Cormack moved, seconded by Mayor Burt to go into Closed Session.

MOTION PASSED: 6-0 Tanaka Absent

Council Member Tanaka arrived at 5:10 PM.

Council went into Closed Session at 5:06 P.M.

Council returned from Closed Session at 6:36 P.M.

There were no announcements for the public.

Special Orders of the Day

2. Proclamation Honoring Bob Hoover.

NO ACTION TAKEN

2.a

Packet Pg. 6


Page 2 of 3 Sp. City Council Meeting

Action Minutes: 03/07/2022

Study Session

3. Joint Study Session with the Utilities Advisory Commission Regarding. SCAP Development and Implementation

NO ACTION TAKEN

Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions

NONE

Consent Calendar

Council Member Tanaka registered a no vote on Agenda Item Number 5.

MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Cormack to approve Agenda Item Numbers 4-5 & AA1.

4. Adoption of a Resolution 10021 Authorizing Use of Teleconferencing for Council Meetings During Covid-19 State of Emergency.

5. Adoption of a Resolution 10022 Amending the City’s 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan in Compliance With the State Water Resources Control Board’s January 4, 2022 Emergency Water Conservation Regulations and Implementing Stage I of Palo Alto’s Amended 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

AA1. Discontinuation of Vaccination/Testing Checks at City Meetings.

MOTION SPLIT FOR PURPOSES OF VOTING

ITEMS 4, AA1 OF MOTION PASSED: 7-0

ITEM 5 PASSED: 6-1, Tanaka no

Council took a break from 8:10 PM to 8:19 PM

Action Items

6. Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) recommends that Council Direct Staff and the PRC to Assess and Conduct Public Outreach on a new Community Gymnasium Project in Palo Alto.

MOTION: Council Member DuBois moved, seconded by Council Member Stone to direct staff and Parks and Recreation Commission to conduct public outreach on a new gym, including location, siting, gym features, cost

2.a

Packet Pg. 7


Page 3 of 3 Sp. City Council Meeting

Action Minutes: 03/07/2022

estimates, funding timeline, demand assessment and prioritization of projects. PRC to also investigate fundraising.

MOTION PASSED: 7-0

7. Colleague's Memo From Vice Mayor Kou and Mayor Burt: Recognizing Key Dates to Advance Race and Equity.

MOTION: Council Member Burt moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Kou to formally recognize and celebrate the following dates:

A. Juneteenth, Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta Day, and add Indigenous People’s Day as dates of historic significance, and May as Asian American Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian Heritage Month; and

B. Authorize Proclamations celebrating the above dates;

C. Refer to the Human Relations Commission recommendations on how to best recognize and celebrate these dates; and

D. Ask the HRC to evaluate recognition of Holocaust Remembrance Day and Armenian Remembrance Day and evaluate if October 11th should be redesignated as Italian Heritage Day.

MOTION PASSED: 7-0

Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 10:03 P.M.

ATTEST: APPROVED:

____________________ ____________________

City Clerk Mayor

NOTE: Action minutes are prepared in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.04.160(a) and (b). Summary minutes (sense) are prepared in accordance with PAMC Section 2.04.160(c). Beginning in January 2018, in accordance with Ordinance No. 5423, the City Council found action minutes and the video/audio recordings of Council proceedings to be the official records of both Council and committee proceedings. These recordings are available on the City’s website.

2.a

Packet Pg. 8

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/city-clerk/ordinances/ordinances-1909-to-present/ordinances-by-number/ord-5423.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/city-clerk/ordinances/ordinances-1909-to-present/ordinances-by-number/ord-5423.pdf

City of Palo Alto (ID # 13569) City Council Staff Report


City of Palo Alto Page 1

Title: Approval of a Construction Contract With Casey Construction, Inc. for Sewer Lateral Installation, Repair and Replacement and Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation in a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $2,998,266 for a Three-Year Term Through June 2025

From: City Manager

Lead Department: Utilities Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute the attached contract with Casey Construction, Inc. C23183408 (Linked Document) for a three (3) year term with a total not-to-exceed amount of $2,998,266 for Sewer Lateral Replacement and Rehabilitation (WC-99013) Capital Improvement project. Background The City’s Utility Department is responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of lower sewer laterals that extend between the main and City cleanout near the customer’s property line. As part of the Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Program (SSMP), the City’s goal is to inspect and clean 3,300 sewer laterals annually out of the approximate 18,000 City owned sewer laterals. During the inspection process sewer lateral defects are graded on a standardized scale. The City also maintains data on sewer overflows from laterals. This information is used to determine the location of frequent overflows. The data from the inspections and the sewer overflows is used to create a prioritized list of laterals that need to be replaced. Currently there are approximately 188 sewer laterals on the priority 1 list to be replaced to minimize sanitary sewer overflows and reduce annual inspections. Priority 1 laterals are structurally damaged and require replacement or there routinely inspected and serviced. Depending on the severity of the conditions, these laterals are inspected and cleared every 1-3 months to prevent sewer overflows. Under the contract (Linked Document), the contractor will replace approximately 70-80 laterals per year. This volume of work is more than can be accomplished by City crews and is typically performed by contractors. In addition to the lateral work, the contractor can do other types of sewer infrastructure repairs under this contract, if directed by the City.

3

Packet Pg. 9

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/attachments/03-21-2022-id-13569-contract.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/attachments/03-21-2022-id-13569-contract.pdf


Discussion Project Description The work to be performed under the contract involves the installation, repair, and replacement of sewer laterals and rehabilitation of various components of the City of Palo Alto's wastewater collection system. The City used a formal solicitation process to establish unit cost pricing for the lateral replacements along with the other infrastructure work that may be needed. The quantity of each bid item was estimated and for bidding purpose only. The total contract amount is based on available budget in the current fiscal year 2022 budget and the projected budgets for future years. Therefore, the total bid price does not represent the total contract amount. The lowest bidder was selected based on the lowest aggregated cost of the estimated quantity for each bid item. The work assigned to the contractor will be limited to the budgeted amount in each contractual period. The final contract amount of $2,475,000 includes $800,000 for the 1st year, $825,000 for the 2nd year, and $850,000 for the 3rd year. The sewer lateral replacement work needs to be performed by the contractor because the project resource requirements are beyond the City’s personnel and equipment capacity. It is critical to replace sewer laterals that are identified with major defects to minimize sanitary sewer overflows and to comply with regulatory requirements. Description of Bid Process and Results On 12/6/2021, the City posted a notice inviting formal bids (IFB) for the Sewer System Replacement, Repair and Install Project on the City’s electronic procurement system, PlanetBids. The bidding period was 36 calendar days. Two (2) contractors submitted bids on January 10, 2022, as listed on the Bid Summary (Attachment A). Bid Summary

BID NAME/NUMBER

SEWER SYSTEM REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND INSTALL -IFB183408

Proposed Length of Project 3-years

Number of notifications sent through PlanetBids 841

Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Builder’s Exchanges 4

Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Contractors 23

Total Days to Respond to Bid 36 calendar days

Pre-Bid Meeting? Yes (Non-mandatory)

Number of Company Attendees at Pre-Bid Meeting 1

Number of Bids Received: 2

Bid Price Range $2,998,266 to $3,024,720

Staff has reviewed the submitted bids and recommends that the bid submitted by Casey Construction, Inc. to be accepted and declared the lowest responsible and responsive bidder.

3

Packet Pg. 10

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/attachments/03-21-2022-id-13569-bid-summary.pdf


The total base bids were approximately 14% to 16% higher than the Engineer’s Estimate. The pricing is due to a lack of competition in the marketplace caused by a booming construction market in the Bay Area. The work quantities specified in the Invitation for Bids (IFB) for this service contract were for bidding purposes only, and can be changed by the City, as stated in the bid documents. The IFB also states that the total work awarded is limited by the available budget, and that the budget amount is an upper limit on spending, not a commitment to spend a certain amount. Thus, staff recommends Council approve the attached contract for the amount of $2,998,266 over a three-year term. The term of the Agreement will be from the date of its full execution until June 30, 2025 (fiscal years 2022 through 2025). Staff confirmed with the Contractor’s State License Board that Casey Construction, Inc. has an active license on file. Staff checked referenced provided by Casey Construction, Inc. for previous work performed and received positive feedback from other agencies. Casey Construction, Inc. is registered and in good standing with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). In addition, Casey Construction, Inc. has contracted with the City in the past on Utilities Department project and has demonstrated the knowledge and ability needed to perform this work. Resource Impact Funds for FY 2022 work on the first year of this contract are available in the FY 2022 Wastewater Collection Capital Budget under WC-99013, Sewer Lateral/Manhole Rehabilitation and Replacement. Funding for subsequent fiscal years is subject to annual budget approval by Council and contractor’s satisfactory performance. This contract is on the City’s construction contract template, which permits the City to terminate without cause/for convenience by providing written notice to the contractor. In the event the City finds itself facing a challenging budget situation, and it is determined that City resources need to be refocused elsewhere, the City can terminate for convenience. Other options include termination due to non-appropriation of funds or amending the contract to reduce the cost, for example, by reducing the scope of work. The contract may also be temporarily suspended by written notice of the City Manager. Staff is advancing this recommendation as reflected in the City’s adopted budget. Should the City Council wish to defer this project in light of the current pandemic and other priorities related to community and economic recovery, this item may be removed from the Consent Calendar. Staff will then return to Council with this and other projects for reconsideration. Policy Implications The approval of this professional services agreement is consistent with existing City goals, policies and plans including: Utilities Strategic Plan Priority 1: Workforce

3

Packet Pg. 11


Strategy 3: Evaluate and consider alternative workforce solutions to achieve organizational business objectives:

Action 2: Determine the potential for projects and/or functions to be effectively outsourced while continuing to meet organizational needs and objectives.

Action 3: Consider developing a hybrid workforce of full-time employees and non-benefitted staff.

Stakeholder Engagement The work under this contract will be performed at various locations of the City. The Contractor will provide two written notifications of the work to all abutting property occupants, one at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work at their specific locations, and a second 24 hours prior to mobilization. Environmental Review This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15301 (b) repair and maintenance of existing public utility facilities and 15302 (c) replacement or reconstruction of existing utility facilities involving no expansion of capacity. Attachments:

• Attachment3.a: Attachment A: Bid Summary

3

Packet Pg. 12

Vendor: Vendor:Bid Item Description TOTAL Bid Item Description TOTAL

A01 11 $ 9,300.00 102,300.00$ A01 11 $ 12,000.00 132,000.00$ A02 38 $ 9,050.00 343,900.00$ A02 38 $ 8,500.00 323,000.00$ A03 3 $ 9,650.00 28,950.00$ A03 3 $ 13,000.00 39,000.00$ A04 3 $ 9,400.00 28,200.00$ A04 3 $ 10,000.00 30,000.00$ A05 3 $ 9,800.00 29,400.00$ A05 3 $ 14,000.00 42,000.00$ A06 3 $ 9,550.00 28,650.00$ A06 3 $ 12,000.00 36,000.00$ A07 2 $ 10,150.00 20,300.00$ A07 2 $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ A8 1 $ 9,900.00 9,900.00$ A8 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ A9 3 $ 8,750.00 26,250.00$ A9 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$

A10 3 $ 8,750.00 26,250.00$ A10 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ A11 3 $ 9,000.00 27,000.00$ A11 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ A12 3 $ 9,000.00 27,000.00$ A12 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ A13 3 $ 150.00 450.00$ A13 3 $ 1,000.00 3,000.00$

698,550.00$ 684,000.00$

B01 11 $ 9,579.00 105,369.00$ B01 11 $ 12,000.00 132,000.00$ B02 38 $ 9,321.50 354,217.00$ B02 38 $ 8,500.00 323,000.00$ B03 3 $ 9,939.50 29,818.50$ B03 3 $ 13,000.00 39,000.00$ B04 3 $ 9,682.00 29,046.00$ B04 3 $ 10,000.00 30,000.00$ B05 3 $ 10,094.00 30,282.00$ B05 3 $ 14,000.00 42,000.00$ B06 3 $ 9,836.50 29,509.50$ B06 3 $ 12,000.00 36,000.00$ B07 2 $ 10,454.50 20,909.00$ B07 2 $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ B08 1 $ 10,197.00 10,197.00$ B08 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ B09 3 $ 9,012.50 27,037.50$ B09 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ B10 3 $ 9,012.50 27,037.50$ B10 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ B11 3 $ 9,270.00 27,810.00$ B11 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ B12 3 $ 9,270.00 27,810.00$ B12 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ B13 3 $ 154.50 463.50$ B13 3 $ 1,000.00 3,000.00$

719,506.50$ 684,000.00$

C01 11 $ 9,866.37 108,530.07$ C01 11 $ 12,000.00 132,000.00$ C02 38 $ 9,601.15 364,843.70$ C02 38 $ 8,500.00 323,000.00$ C03 3 $ 10,237.69 30,713.07$ C03 3 $ 13,000.00 39,000.00$ C04 3 $ 9,972.46 29,917.38$ C04 3 $ 10,000.00 30,000.00$ C05 3 $ 10,396.82 31,190.46$ C05 3 $ 14,000.00 42,000.00$ C06 3 $ 10,131.60 30,394.80$ C06 3 $ 12,000.00 36,000.00$

Casey Construction, Inc. Devaney.

Attachment A3.a

Packet Pg. 13



C07 2 $ 10,768.14 21,536.28$ C07 2 $ 15,000.00 30,000.00$ C08 1 $ 10,502.91 10,502.91$ C08 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ C09 3 $ 9,282.88 27,848.64$ C09 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ C10 3 $ 9,282.88 27,848.64$ C10 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ C11 3 $ 9,548.10 28,644.30$ C11 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ C12 3 $ 9,548.10 28,644.30$ C12 3 $ 3,000.00 9,000.00$ C13 3 $ 159.14 477.42$ C13 3 $ 1,000.00 3,000.00$

741,091.97$ 684,000.00$

D01 192 $ 200.00 38,400.00$ D01 192 $ 300.00 57,600.00$ D02 192 $ 210.00 40,320.00$ D02 192 $ 325.00 62,400.00$ D03 64 $ 225.00 14,400.00$ D03 64 $ 350.00 22,400.00$ D04 64 $ 240.00 15,360.00$ D04 64 $ 375.00 24,000.00$ D05 64 $ 275.00 17,600.00$ D05 64 $ 450.00 28,800.00$ D06 192 $ 150.00 28,800.00$ D06 192 $ 50.00 9,600.00$ D07 1 $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ D07 1 $ 9,000.00 9,000.00$ D08 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ D08 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ D09 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ D09 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ D10 1 $ 17,000.00 17,000.00$ D10 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ D11 1 $ 9,000.00 9,000.00$ D11 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ D12 1 $ 11,000.00 11,000.00$ D12 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ D13 1 $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ D13 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ D14 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ D14 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ D15 1 $ 3,200.00 3,200.00$ D15 1 $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ D16 192 $ 15.00 2,880.00$ D16 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ D17 192 $ 25.00 4,800.00$ D17 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ D18 192 $ 35.00 6,720.00$ D18 192 $ 30.00 5,760.00$

271,480.00$ 324,240.00$

E01 192 $ 206.00 39,552.00$ E01 192 $ 300.00 57,600.00$ E02 192 $ 216.30 41,529.60$ E02 192 $ 325.00 62,400.00$ E03 64 $ 231.75 14,832.00$ E03 64 $ 350.00 22,400.00$ E04 64 $ 247.20 15,820.80$ E04 64 $ 375.00 24,000.00$ E05 64 $ 283.25 18,128.00$ E05 64 $ 450.00 28,800.00$ E06 192 $ 154.50 29,664.00$ E06 192 $ 50.00 9,600.00$ E07 1 $ 10,300.00 10,300.00$ E07 1 $ 9,000.00 9,000.00$ E08 1 $ 15,450.00 15,450.00$ E08 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ E09 1 $ 15,450.00 15,450.00$ E09 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ E10 1 $ 17,510.00 17,510.00$ E10 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$

3.a

Packet Pg. 14



E11 1 $ 9,270.00 9,270.00$ E11 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ E12 1 $ 11,330.00 11,330.00$ E12 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ E13 1 $ 10,300.00 10,300.00$ E13 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ E14 1 $ 12,360.00 12,360.00$ E14 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ E15 1 $ 3,296.00 3,296.00$ E15 1 $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ E16 192 $ 15.45 2,966.40$ E16 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ E17 192 $ 25.75 4,944.00$ E17 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ E18 192 $ 36.05 6,921.60$ E18 192 $ 30.00 5,760.00$

279,624.40$ 324,240.00$

F01 192 $ 212.18 40,738.56$ F01 192 $ 300.00 57,600.00$ F02 192 $ 222.79 42,775.68$ F02 192 $ 325.00 62,400.00$ F03 64 $ 238.70 15,276.80$ F03 64 $ 350.00 22,400.00$ F04 64 $ 254.62 16,295.68$ F04 64 $ 375.00 24,000.00$ F05 64 $ 291.75 18,672.00$ F05 64 $ 450.00 28,800.00$ F06 192 $ 159.14 30,554.88$ F06 192 $ 50.00 9,600.00$ F07 1 $ 10,609.00 10,609.00$ F07 1 $ 9,000.00 9,000.00$ F08 1 $ 15,913.50 15,913.50$ F08 1 $ 13,000.00 13,000.00$ F09 1 $ 15,913.50 15,913.50$ F09 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ F10 1 $ 18,035.30 18,035.30$ F10 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ F11 1 $ 9,548.10 9,548.10$ F11 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ F12 1 $ 11,669.90 11,669.90$ F12 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ F13 1 $ 10,609.00 10,609.00$ F13 1 $ 12,000.00 12,000.00$ F14 1 $ 12,730.80 12,730.80$ F14 1 $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ F15 1 $ 3,394.88 3,394.88$ F15 1 $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ F16 192 $ 15.91 3,054.72$ F16 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ F17 192 $ 26.52 5,091.84$ F17 192 $ 20.00 3,840.00$ F18 192 $ 37.13 7,128.96$ F18 192 $ 30.00 5,760.00$

288,013.10$ 324,240.00$

2,998,265.97$ 3,024,720.00$

3.a

Packet Pg. 15


Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 3/21/2022


Summary Title: Review of 2021 Comp Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report

Title: Authorize Transmittal of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan Annual Progress Report to the Office of Planning and Research and the 2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the Department of Housing and Community Development

From: City Manager

Lead Department: Planning and Development Services

Recommendation: The Planning and Transportation Commission and staff recommend Council review the

following State-mandated Annual Progress Reports (APR) and direct staff to submit them to the

appropriate State authorities by April 1, 2022:

1. 2021 Comprehensive Plan Annual Progress Report (Attachment A) to the Office of

Planning and Research (OPR); and

2. 2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Attachments B and C) to the

Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

Executive Summary: In accordance with Government Code Section 65400

1 and Palo Alto’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan

(Comp Plan), the City is required to submit Annual Progress Reports (APRs) to the State by April

1, 2022 for the Comprehensive Plan and the Housing Element implementation. This staff report

1Government Code Section 65400:

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65400

4

Packet Pg. 16

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65400


summarizes progress towards the programs set forth in Comprehensive Plan Implementation

Plan Table2 and the 2015-2023 Housing Element3.

• The Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan APR is submitted to the State Office of Planning

and Research (OPR). The APR summarizes the City’s progress implementing the 410

programs identified in the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, including the 72 items in the

Housing Element.

• The Housing Element APR is submitted to the State Department of Housing and

Community Development (HCD). This APR describes the progress the City made in 2021

implementing the Housing Element programs and provides updated figures on the

City’s compliance with its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).

Background: This is the fourth year of annual reporting since the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan

in 2017. The City Council reviewed the last update for 2020 on March 15, 2021 (Staff Report4).

The following section provides the context for the annual reporting.

Comprehensive Plan Implementation Annual Progress Report

The Annual Comprehensive Plan Implementation Report is a State mandated report, required

by Government Code (GC) Section 65400. GC 65400 states that after a legislative body (City

Council) adopts the Comprehensive Plan, an annual review must be submitted to the City

Council, the Office of Planning and Research (OPR), and the Department of Housing and

Community Development (HCD) Department on the status of the plan’s progress and

implementation.

In addition, the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Section 19.04.0305) requires the Planning and

Transportation Commission (PTC) to annually review the Implementation Plan table of the

Comprehensive Plan. The code states that “the planning commission shall annually review the

2 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Table: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-

development-services/3.-comprehensive-plan/comprehensive-plan/2030-comp-plan-9-implementation-june-

21.pdf

3 Housing Element 2015-2023: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-

services/3.-comprehensive-plan/comprehensive-plan/compplan_2017_13_housingelement_pdf_w_links.pdf

4 City Council Staff Report, March 15, 2021: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-

reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/2021/id-11838.pdf 5 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 19.04.030:

https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-82254#JD_19.04.030

4

Packet Pg. 17

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-services/3.-comprehensive-plan/comprehensive-plan/2030-comp-plan-9-implementation-june-21.pdf


https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-services/3.-comprehensive-plan/comprehensive-plan/compplan_2017_13_housingelement_pdf_w_links.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/2021/id-11838.pdf











general plan and recommend to the city council such extensions, changes or additions to the

plan as the commission may consider necessary in the view of any change in conditions.”

Planning and Transportation Commission Review

On February 23, 2022, the PTC held a public hearing and discussed the two Annual Progress

Reports. The minutes for the meeting are available online6. The PTC did not make any

recommendations for changes to the existing programs or prioritization. The PTC unanimously

recommended that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Housing Element APRs be forwarded to

the City Council for authorization to submit to the appropriate state agencies before April 1,

2022.

2015-2023 Housing Element and the Annual Progress Report

The HCD Department requires an annual report addressing the City’s progress implementing

the Housing Element. The report includes data on housing production and accomplishments

toward the City’s RHNA goals. The City adopted its current Housing Element7 for the period of

2015-2023. The HCD mandates that the APR for the Housing Element focus on three topics:

1. Total number of net housing units produced or “permitted” by the City in a calendar

year

2. Status on jurisdiction’s progress in addressing its Regional Housing Needs Allocation

(RHNA)

3. Status of the implementation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element’s programs and goals

The previous Annual Progress Report for 2020 for this current Housing Element cycle can be

found here8.

Discussion: This section provides an overview of the Comprehensive Plan APR and the Housing Element

APR and provides high-level summaries of the related data. See Attachments A, B, and C for

individual Comprehensive Plan and Housing Element program details and the City’s compliance

with its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) needs in 2021.

Comprehensive Plan Implementation Programs Annual Progress Report

6 PTC Meeting Minutes: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-

and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes

7 2015-2023 Housing Element: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/37935

8 2020 Annual Progress Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-

services-1/housing-element/housingelement_2015_2023/2020-annual-element-progress-report.pdf

4

Packet Pg. 18

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-development-services-1/housing-element/housingelement_2015_2023/2020-annual-element-progress-report.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/37935




The Implementation Plan Table9 of the Comprehensive Plan identified 410 programs the City

wants to undertake to help achieve the goals in the Comprehensive Plan, to the extent that

resources are available. These programs are attributed to approximately 15 different lead

agencies or departments. The programs in the Implementation Table describe and prioritize

actions to implement various aspects of the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Some

programs are budgeted and ongoing, while the implementation of other programs will require

identification of resources during future budget cycles.

Since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in late 2017, the implementation of most of the

programs remains in “Ongoing” status (67%). Table 1 below provides the year-end status for all

the programs in 2021.

TABLE 1: 2021 STATUS OF PROGRAMS

Program Status # of Programs

Complete 10

Ongoing 277

Pending 95

Partially Complete 28

Total 410

Source: City of Palo Alto, Planning and Development Services, 2022 February

It should be noted that some programs when “complete” are 100% concluded and no further

action is required. When some programs move from a “complete” status to “on-going” that

means the initial work effort to set the program tasks up has been completed (moving the

program out of “pending” status), and the focus shifts to ongoing monitoring or other similar

work effort.

In 2021, seven programs changed status from previous year, with the majority of the programs

moving from Complete to Ongoing status. This has led to an increase in the number of

“ongoing” programs this year. There were no changes in status for the rest of the 403

programs. Table 2 below provides the list of programs that went through status change in 2021.

9 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Table: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/planning-amp-

development-services/3.-comprehensive-plan/comprehensive-plan/2030-comp-plan-9-implementation-june-

21.pdf

4

Packet Pg. 19






TABLE 2: PROGRAM WITH STATUS CHANGE FROM 2020

Program Text Lead

Department

2020

Status

2021

Status

Status

Change

B6.1.1 Actively work with Downtown

businesses, professional associations

and the Palo Alto Chamber of

Commerce to retain successful retail

businesses that contribute to the

City’s goals for Downtown.

Planning and

Development

Services & City

Manager's

Office

C O Complete

to Ongoing

C3.3.4 Periodically assess the need to

adjust parkland dedication or fees in

lieu thereof to ensure they remain

proportional to real estate values in

Palo Alto.

Planning and

Development

Services and

Community

Services

Department

P C Pending to

Complete

N4.5.1 Study the supply and quality of local

groundwater aquifers to better

understand their utility as natural

water storage.

City of Palo

Alto Utilities &

Department of

Public Works

C O Complete

to Ongoing

N4.13.2 Develop and implement a green

stormwater infrastructure plan with

the goal to treat and infiltrate

stormwater.

Department of

Public Works C O

Complete

to Ongoing

N7.8.1 Evaluate energy efficient

approaches for the treatment and

reuse of organic waste that

maximize resource recovery and

reduce greenhouse gas generation

at the RWQCP located in Palo Alto

and the Palo Alto Landfill.

Office of

Sustainability

and Office of

Emergency

Services

C O Complete

to Ongoing

S1.5.1 Promote neighborhood security by

providing crime prevention

information and training to residents

and continuing to fund resident

involvement in neighborhood safety

programs such as “Know Your

Neighbor” grants and Block

Preparedness Coordinators.

Police

Department

and Office of

Emergency

Services P O

Pending to

Ongoing

S3.1.4 Establish protocols to monitor the

movement of hazardous materials

on Palo Alto roadways and respond

effectively to spills via established

truck and construction routes.

Fire

Department

C O Complete

to Ongoing

4

Packet Pg. 20



In the Implementation Plan Table, the programs are categorized by priority with the following

categories: In progress, Long-term, Medium-term, Routine, and Short-term. Table 3 below

provides the 2021 statuses of the programs within each of the mentioned categories, reflecting

the progress made by the City.

TABLE 3. PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION BY PRIORITY AND 2021 STATUSES

Priority of Program/Timing

Number of

Programs

Status

Complete Ongoing Pending

Partially

Complete

IP - “In progress” – programs that

were already underway to complete a

specific, defined work effort at the

time of the Comprehensive Plan’s

adoption

46 (11%) 2 38 5 1

L - “Long-term” – programs that would

be implemented or completed more

than ten years after Comprehensive

Plan adoption

11 (3%) 0 5 4 2

M - “Medium-term” – typically means

programs that would be implemented

or completed roughly within five to

ten years after Comprehensive Plan

adoption

91 (23%) 0 44 40 7

R - “Routine” activities that are part of

the normal course of business for staff

163 (39%) 3 132 20 8

S - “Short-term” – programs planned

for implementation within the first

five years after Comprehensive Plan

adoption

98 (24%) 5 58 25 10

S-M - "Short -term" to" Medium -

term" projects

1 (0.24%) 1

TOTAL 410 10 277 95 28


Annual Progress Report and Regional Housing Needs Allocation

The State requires the APR to describe the City’s progress in meeting its share of RHNA and

efforts to preserve, rehabilitate, or produce housing. As part of the RHNA process overseen by

the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), the City of Palo Alto was assigned a

quantified goal of 1,988 units. This number represents the City’s “fair share” of projected

4

Packet Pg. 21


housing need over the 5th Cycle 2015-2023 planning period. The projected need is distributed

among the following income groups: extremely low and very low (691 units), low (432 units),

moderate (278 units), and above moderate (587 units) income.

In 2021, Palo Alto made progress toward its RHNA requirement by adding 117 very low-income

and 120 above moderate (market rate) units; see Attachment C for the 2021 APR details. Table

4 shows the RHNA breakdown by income group. Please note that the 117 very low-income

units are the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park units. Although the acquisition of the mobile home

park occurred in 2017, at that time, the State did not allow the City to count the deed-restricted

mobile home units towards its RHNA. However, recent legislation changed the reporting

requirements allowing the City to count these units.

TABLE 4: CITY OF PALO ALTO REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION 2015-2023

Income Group % of County AMI

Palo Alto RHNA

(2014-2022) % of Units

Very Low 0-50% 691 35%

Low 51-81% 432 22%

Moderate 81-120% 278 14%

Above Moderate 120%+ 587 29%

Total 1,988 100%


Table 5 below provides a summary of the City’s progress in meeting its RHNA through 2021. The

numbers are based on building permits issued as required by HCD. The City is more than 87%

complete in its current housing planning cycle and of note has produced 108% of its Above

Moderate Income RHNA goal. By making sufficient progress towards the City's Above Moderate

RHNA, the City retains more authority over the review process for housing development

projects. Per SB 35 requirements, a proposed development in the City requires a 50%

affordability component to be eligible for the streamlined ministerial approval process. If the

City was not on track with its Above Moderate RHNA, the required affordability threshold drops

to 10% to qualify for the SB 35 streamlined review process.

TABLE 5: CITY OF PALO ALTO RHNA PROGRESS 2014-2021 CUMULATIVE

Income Group Palo Alto RHNA

Number of Units

Permitted

% of RHNA

Accomplished

Very Low 691 218 32%

Low 432 65 15%

Moderate 278 26 9%

Above Moderate 587 634 108%

4

Packet Pg. 22


Total 1,988 732 47%


Housing Goals, Policies, and Programs Implementation

The Housing Element contains 72 adopted programs the City will need to implement during the

Housing Element period ending in 2023. Of the 72 programs listed in the Housing Element:

• 35 are ongoing programs (effectively completed)

• 21 have been completed

• 11 are underway

• five programs have not yet been completed

Currently, staff remain focused on the 6th Cycle Housing Element update, no additional

programs were implemented. Therefore, these numbers have not changed since last year. Its

also notable that additional housing related policy initiatives have been undertaken that are not

necessarily in the Housing Element (for example tenant protections). These additional projects

and programs are not accounted for.

Of the 72 adopted programs, 56 (79%) are considered complete (for example, established on-

going programs and completed programs). A summary table of each housing program is

included as Attachment B. The City is 87.5% of the way through the current Housing Element

cycle and is keeping pace with completing the Housing programs by 2023. Most of the

remaining programs not completed (i.e., partially completed or not completed) are addressed

in the Housing Work Program. Table 6 below shows which programs are ongoing, completed,

partially completed, and not completed.

TABLE 6. STATUS OF HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS

(DECEMBER 2014 TO DECEMBER 2021)

Program Status Program Numbers Total # of

Programs

Ongoing Promote/Incentivize Rehabilitation and Neighborhood

Revitalization: 35

H1.1.1; H3.2.2; H1.3.1

Implementation of BMR Ordinance

H3.1.2; H3.1.3; H3.1.5

Enforcement of Condominium Conversion

H3.1.9; H3.1.10

Support of 100% Affordable Housing Projects

H3.1.11; H3.3.1; H3.3.2; H3.4.2; H2.3.1

Assisting Lower Income Households

H3.4.4; H3.2.1

4

Packet Pg. 23


Regional Efforts to Support Housing

H3.3.6; H3.4.1; H3.5.1; H4.1.1; H5.1.3; H3.1.13

Fair Housing and CDBG Implementation

H4.1.2; H4.1.3; H4.1.4; H4.1.5; H4.1.6

Promote Green Building

H5.1.1; H5.1.2; H5.1.4; H5.1.5; H5.1.6

Completed Modifying Zoning Code for Promotion of ADU 21

H1.1.2; H3.3.5

Amending Zoning Code and BMR Ordinance to Create

Incentives for Affordable Housing and Workforce Housing

H2.1.4; H2.1.9; H3.6.1; H2.2.1; H3.1.1; H2.1.1; H2.1.2;

H2.2.8; H2.1.3; H2.1.6; H3.1.12; H2.2.7; H3.3.3;

Promotion of Housing Sites and Developed Plans

H2.1.8; H5.1.7; H2.2.6; H2.1.12;

Housing Preservation via Financial Incentives

H2.2.4; H3.1.8

Creation of Affordable Housing Fund via Impact and In-lieu

payments

H3.4.3; H3.1.6

Support of Transitional Housing

H3.5.2; H3.5.3;

Partially

Completed

Reduction of Fees and Flexible Development Standards for

Preservation of Cottages

11

H1.1.3; H2.1.4

BMR Requirements in Condominium Conversions and

Preservation of At-Risk Units

H1.2.1; H3.1.4;

Increase Connectivity and Walkability and Study of Parking

H2.1.7

Development of Coordinated Plans

H2.2.3; H2.1.10; H2.1.5

Outreach to Identify Housing Sites and Regional

Collaboration

H2.2.2; H4.2.2; 3.1.14;

Not Completed Pedestrian and Transit Oriented Overlay 5

H2.1.11

Identify Transit Rich Housing Sites

H2.2.5

Innovative Housing

4

Packet Pg. 24


H3.1.7;

Group homes and Flexible Standards for Special Needs

H3.3.4; H4.2.1

TOTAL 72

Policy Implications: The City is required under Government Code Section 65400 to submit these two Annual

Progress Reports in State specified format each year to the Office of Planning and Research and

to the Department of Housing and Community Development by April 1st of each year.

Resource Impact: There is no resource impact. Staff time to prepare and submit reports was contemplated in the

allocation of resources to the department.

Timeline: Following Council direction, staff will submit the two APR reports to the State by April 1, 2022.

Stakeholder Engagement: Members of the public had the opportunity to comment on these APR reports during the PTC

hearing held on February 23, 2022 and December 8, 2021. Members of the public were also

permitted to submit comments in writing. At the PTC meeting, there were no speakers for this

item.

Environmental Review: This report on the City’s progress of the existing Implementation Chapter of the Comprehensive

Plan and Housing Element is not a project requiring review under the California Environmental

Quality Act (CEQA).

Attachments:

Attachment4.a: Attachment A: Comprehensive Plan Implementation Table, 2021 (PDF)

Attachment4.b: Attachment B: Housing Element Programs Implementation Table, 2021

(PDF)

Attachment4.c: Attachment C: City RHNA Progress, 2021 (XLSX)

4

Packet Pg. 25

ATTACHMENT A

Guide to Review the Comprehensive Plan Implementation Table

The programs of the Implementation Table has the following fields:

Lead Department or AgencyThe City Department that would have primary responsibility for tracking and completing the program.

Priority of Program/TimingThe City Council prioritized the timing of program implementation at the time of Comprehensive Plan adoption in 2017. The prioritization guided the allocation of resources to implement the plan. The following five categories, which appear in Attachment A, reflect the level of priority for program accomplishment:S: “Short-term” – programs planned for implementation within the first five years after Comprehensive Plan adoptionM: “Medium-term” – typically means programs that would be implemented or completed roughly within five to ten years after Comprehensive Plan adoption

L: “Long-term” – programs that would be implemented or completed more than ten years after Comprehensive Plan adoptionIP: “In progress” – programs that were already underway to complete a specific, definedwork effort at the time of the Comprehensive Plan’s adoption, andR: “Routine” activities that are part of the normal course of business for staff.

Level of EffortThe level of effort indicated in Attachment A reflects the magnitude of cost in terms of staff and monetary resources required to implement the program. While the dollar sign ($) is used to reflect the cost, the exact associated financial cost for the project/program is difficult to determine since it varies over time and depends on the scope of work. Attachment A reflects the following measures for level of effort: “$” low level effort and cost; “$$” moderate level effort and cost; and “$$$” significant level of commitment and cost to complete the program.

2021 StatusThe progress towards each of the 410 programs is identified in the “2021 Status” column in Attachment A. The key for the different statuses is as follows: C = Complete, PC = Partially Complete, O = Ongoing, and P = Pending.

Staff Comments 2021This includes an explanation provided by department staff on the programs.

4.a

Packet Pg. 26

PriorityLevel of Effort

2021 Status

S= Short (< 5 years), M=

Medium (5‐10 years), L= Long (>10

years), IP= In Progress, R=

Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium

$$$=Substantial Effort

C= Complete, PC= Partially Complete, O= Ongoing, P=

Pending

B.1.1 Implement and periodically amend an Economic Development Policy to guide business development in the City in a manner consistent with Policy L-1.10.

Planning and Development Services & City Manager's Office

R $ O The City continues to monitor the office / Research & Development growth. In 2021, there was a net loss of 8,139 sq. ft. of office space, leaving a remaining development balance of 527,434 square feet. No related policy recommendations were proposed.

B3.2.1 Continue to refine tools, such as the Business Registry, as data sources on existing businesses, including the type of business, number of employees, size, location, and other metrics to track the diversity of Palo Alto businesses.

Administrative Services Department

IP $$ O The City has engaged the firm Avenue to update the business registry database with external data sources and outreach to business that may not be registered or have incomplete data. Previous efforts were placed on hold due to pandemic. This work is expected to resume in 2022. In addition, with the possible upcoming business license tax scheduled to be voted on in Nov. 2022 the structure of BRC could change. The outcome of the vote and possible impact on the BRC is expected to be reviewed in late 2022.

B4.2.1 Revise zoning and other regulations as needed to encourage the preservation of space to accommodate small businesses, start-ups and other services.

Planning and Development Services

M $$ P Work has not commenced.

B4.2.2 Consider planning, regulatory, or other incentives to encourage property owners to include smaller office spaces in their buildings to serve small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and independent professionals.


M $ P Work has not commenced.

Business & Economics Element

Goal B-1: Businesses in Palo Alto that contribute to economic vitality, enhance the city’s physical environment, promote municipal revenues and provide needed local services.

Goal B-3: Careful management of City revenues and expenditures so that the fiscal health of the City is ensured and services are delivered efficiently and equitably.

Goal B-4: The stimulation of diverse commercial, retail and professional service business opportunities through supportive business policies and a culture of innovation.

Program TextLead

DepartmentStaff Comments

Page 2 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 27


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


B4.6.1 Work with local merchants to encourage Palo Alto residents, workers, and visitors to buy in Palo Alto.


R $$ O The City Council has allocated resources toward a dedicated Economic Development/Vitality staff person to join the City Manager's team. This person will continue to do business engagement, etc.

B4.6.2 Study the overall viability of ground-floor retail requirements in preserving retail space and creating an active street environment, including the types of locations where such requirements are most effective.


M $$ P COVID-19 prioritized adjustments as determined by the City. As the Economic Development Policy is updated, resources may be assigned to this medium-term project.

B4.6.3 Maintain distinct neighborhood shopping areas that are attractive, accessible, and convenient to nearby residents.


R $ O This is an ongoing effort. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

B5.1.1 Regularly evaluate ways to improve coordination of the City’s environmental review, permitting, and inspection processes.


R $ O This is an ongoing effort.

B5.1.2 Improve design guidelines to reduce ambiguity and more clearly articulate compatibility principles to the business community and to the public.


M $$ P Objective Standards project will correct some sections of ambiguity. Additional work will be starting in approximately three years.

B5.1.3 Simplify the design review process for small-scale changes to previously approved site plans and buildings.


M $$ O This is an ongoing effort.

B5.1.4 Revise zoning and other regulations as needed to encourage the revitalization of aging retail structures and areas. Encourage the preservation of space to accommodate small, independent retail businesses and professional services.


R $$ P No zoning regulation changes are proposed at this time.

Goal B-6: Attractive, vibrant retail centers, each with a mix of uses and a distinctive character.

Goal B-5: City regulations and operating procedures that provide certainty, predictability and flexibility and help businesses adapt to changing market conditions.

Page 3 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 28


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


B6.1.1 Actively work with Downtown businesses, professional associations and the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce to retain successful retail businesses that contribute to the City’s goals for Downtown.


R $$ O The City continues to collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce, the Downtown Business Improvement Districts (BID), California Avenue businesses, hoteliers, Stanford Shopping Center, and others to promote a strong business climate. This includes Uplift Local initiatives, public art, holiday events, and focused business support.

B7.2.1 Review policies and regulations guiding development at Stanford Research Park and revise them as needed to allow improved responsiveness to changing market conditions in a manner consistent with Policy L-1.10.


M $$ P The City meets regularly with Stanford University regarding land use on an ongoing basis. The Housing Element process in 2021-22 will include consideration of this program.

B7.2.2 Study the feasibility of a “transfer of development rights” (TDR) program and other measures that would provide greater development flexibility within Stanford Research Park without creating significant adverse traffic impacts or increasing the allowable floor area.



C.1.15.3 Collaborate with Palo Alto Community Child Care (PACCC) to identify, develop, and promote high quality early learning environments to serve all families in our community.

Community Services Department

R $ O City staff continues to work collaboratively with Palo Alto Community Child Care (PACCC) by managing our service contracts with them in order to provide the best care possible.

Goal B-7: Thriving business employment districts at Stanford Research Park, Stanford Medical Center, East Bayshore/San Antonio Road Area and Bayshore Corridor that complement the City’s business and neighborhood centers.

Community Services & Facilities Element

Goal C-1: Deliver community services effectively and efficiently.

Page 4 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 29


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C.1.17.2 Develop programs and activities for teens that strengthen leadership skills, encourage a culture of community service, inclusiveness, tolerance and acceptance of others.


R $ O The City supports and the Community Services Department staffs Teen Leadership Groups, including the Art Center Teen Leadership Group (ACTL), Palo Alto Youth Council (PAYC), Teen Advisory Board (TAB), and Teen Arts Council (TAC), as well as overseeing Think Fund, a supportive grant program for teens, and the makerspace, MakeX. The teen leadership groups give Palo Alto high school students the opportunity to serve the teen community by acting as a voice toward action and change. The City also continues to support Project Safety Net on youth suicide prevention and mental health awareness through community education, outreach, and training; access to quality youth mental health services; and policy advocacy. In conjunction with the Creative Attention project funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services to the Palo Alto Art Center Foundation, Art Center Teen Leadership teens will work with artist Christine Wong Yap on a belonging project with seniors and others in the community to identify places of belonging. A map documenting these locations will be exhibited in the Creative Attention exhibition in spring 2022 at the Art Center.

C.1.18.2 Support, promote, and publicize the provision of comprehensive senior services in coordination with senior service providers. Comprehensive services include addressing senior nutrition, mental health and transportation.


R $ O City continues to support Avenidas for senior programming/services and La Comida for senior nutrition needs.

C.1.18.3 Establish a support program for caregivers of seniors and people with disabilities by partnering with private, nonprofit, faith-based and public community serviceorganizations.



Page 5 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 30


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C.1.2.2 Explore a City solution to help residents and others to resolve questions and concerns and navigate the City’s community services and facilities.


M $ O Residents can now more easily navigate programs, services and facilities offered by the Community Services Department on the City's new website. Customer service staff are available by phone, email or in person to assist customers.

C1.1.1 Based on identified needs, continue to provide and expand the provision of multilingual literature, program information and educational displays at public community facilities and parks.


R $ P No substantial action has occurred to report.

C1.1.2 Establish a cross-cultural outreach program to engage residents of all ages, cultural, social and linguistic backgrounds in educational, recreational and cultural activities offered throughout the City of Palo Alto.


M $ O With funding from First 5 Santa Clara, the Junior Museum continues its pre-school science programing to multicultural underserved neighborhoods in San Jose at the same levels as the previous year. In FY21, the Department will deliver in-person and virtual science lessons to children and adults from 11 First 5 Family Resource Centers. These families represent multiple ethnicities and languages.

C1.12.1 In cooperation with public and private businesses, nonprofit organizations, and PAUSD, develop a service program that will coordinate the efforts of agencies providing services to families and youth in Palo Alto.


R $ PC Community Services Department continued to convene a group of local nonprofits in FY21 providing human service needs to identify needs and coordinate resources. This group continues to meet monthly. A group consisting of the Early Childcare Education Committee and childcare providers also continues to meet regularly with Human Services staff to understand the challenges of childcare providers.

C1.13.1 Determine the potential for City shared use of PAUSD facilities for weekend, summer and evening use for community uses such as child care, libraries, recreational facilities, community meeting space, education, language education, health care, culture and computer resources.


M O There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

Page 6 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 31


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C1.15.1 Support and promote the provision of comprehensive child care services in Palo Alto by public and private providers, including employers.


S $ O Early Care & Education Committee under the direction of City staff continue to work to address the needs of parents in Palo Alto. Community Services Department staff and the Committee have been meeting regularly with child care providers to understand their needs and challenges due to COVID-19 and beyond.

C1.15.2 Utilize the Early Care and Education Committee to develop and update the Child Care Master Plan, and to connect providers and professionals working with families with young children, explore challenges and opportunities to programs and services for young children, and support early education programs in the community in their efforts to enhance quality.


S $ PC Staff and the Committee will be bringing a recommended action plan to City Council for approval in October 2021. City Council approved $30,000 from the Child Care Trust Fund to provide support for Early Childcare Educators through trainings, workshops, and mini grants for professional consultants related to behavioral and mental health support. As of January 2022, several mini grants have been provided to educators.

C1.15.4 Explore opportunities to provide access to childcare for families of City employees.


L $ O Human Resources Department conducted an employee survey to identify childcare needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. And in response to the needs of the employees, the Human Resources department launched an employee benefits resources pages that provide links to help employees connect to resources that provide services and information related to short term and long terms dependent care needs and other local social media providers.

Page 7 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 32


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C1.16.1 Identify funding sources for expanded outreach and increased involvement to support youth and teen leadership programs and events.


M $ O This is an ongoing effort and Community Services Department's nonprofit partners provide some support for these programs. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

C1.16.2 Leverage available funding to pursue support of teen mental, physical, social and emotional health programs.


R $ O The City continues to support Project Safety Net, now a 501(c)(3) and Youth Community Service, to support teen mental health programs. The Palo Alto Art Center Foundation received a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services in fall 2021 to implement the Creative Attention program of educational programs, an exhibition, and residencies intended to support individual and community resilience programs, including teen activities.

C1.17.1 Optimize participation in such programs by increasing the number of locations where the programs are provided and by supporting transportation options to these locations.


S $ P Many programs shifted to a virtual format during the pandemic. Providing transportation options has not progressed.

C1.17.3 Promote a diverse range of interests and vocations among programs offered to children, youth and teens.


M $ O Community Services Department strives to offer programs that appeal to all interests. These range from visual and performing arts, sports, science, academics, and leadership programs. Community Services Department has continued many of these program offerings in a virtual format during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Page 8 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 33


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C1.18.1 Develop a program to engage the talents and skills that seniors possess that would provide volunteer opportunities throughout the City.


R $ P Work has not commenced. The Art Center maintains an active volunteer program that engages all ages in the community, including seniors. Other volunteer opportunities exist in open space preserves, middle school sports, and other programs.

C1.2.1 Periodically review public information, outreach and community relations activities to evaluate effectiveness.


R $ O Working with the City Manager’s Office, the Community Services Department conducts ongoing evaluation of outreach efforts to ensure maximum reach to the community.

C1.2.3 Identify barriers to participation in City programming and facilities across gender, age, socioeconomic and ethnic groups and sexual identity and orientation, as well as mental and physical abilities, and adopt strategies to remove barriers to participation.


S $ O The Art Center and Junior Museum & Zoo continue their Working Together collaboration—focused on diversifying the museum field-- and as the program concludes, are actively working to identify private funding sources to continue and expand the program. In Fall 2021 the Palo Alto Art Center presents The Art of Disability Culture exhibition, which features the work of 20 artists with disabilities. The exhibition includes numerous access features, including visual descriptions of all artworks available online or in the gallery with QR codes, Braille translated labels and large-print labels. Public programs presented in conjunction with the exhibition include ASL interpretation, live captioning, and virtual participation opportunities.

Page 9 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 34


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C1.2.4 Based on identified needs, expand program offerings to underserved groups.


R $$$ O Thanks to support from the Palo Alto Art Center Foundation, the Art Center continues its Project Look school tours and Cultural Kaleidoscope program to underserved communities in East Palo Alto. Programs in FY21 took place virtually, in fall 2021 these programs will take place in-classroom or virtually. In addition, the Palo Alto Art Center Foundation partnered with Dreamcatchers in FY21 to offer scholarships to Art Center classes for their low-income constituents.

C1.20.1 Partner with agencies for support and improved access so that all can participate as appropriate in Palo Alto recreational programs.


R $ O City has existing partnerships with PAUSD, Youth Community Services, Friends Groups and Foundations to provide accessible programs. Palo Alto Swim and Sport provides scholarships through the Beyond Barriers program to ensure all youth have access to the pool facilities. The Golf Course offers low cost youth programs through First Tee, Youth on Course and offers a junior golf rate.

C1.22.1 Increase awareness about caring and compassion for the unhoused and those who suffer from mental and/or physical conditions through educational programming in partnership with community and business organizations throughout the region.


R $ O This is an ongoing task. City receives continued support of major Human Services providers that work with the unhoused.

Page 10 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 35


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C1.22.2 Work with Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, the State of California, the federal government, non-profit agencies, business and other organizations to define roles and responsibilities in the comprehensive provision of permanent supportive housing and temporary shelter, food, clothing and transportation for those in need.


R $ O The City continues to be involved with the County and local non profits to provide supportive permanent housing/food/shelter/other basic human needs.

C1.3.1 Develop and implement a plan to collect and analyze data on demographics, use of community service facilities and needs of the community as related to parks, open spaces, recreation, arts and culture.


M $ O Community Services Department’s program areas regularly collect and review demographic information from program participants. The Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan contains information on community needs.

C1.6.1 Establish a program to facilitate continuing corporate support for community services through contributions of funds, time, materials and expertise.


M $ P A formal program to facilitate corporate support has not been established. Corporate sponsorships for special events have been received.

C2.2.1 Establish performance review criteria for City employees that consider the quality of service provided.

Human Resources Department

M $ P In 2020 the City continued to utilize the current evaluation process throughout the pandemic and until more resources can be allocated to implement the on-line evaluation platform.

C2.2.2 Periodically perform evaluations of City service delivery and develop strategies for continuous improvement. Use metrics and make information publicly available.


R $$ O This is an ongoing effort.

Goal C-2: Demonstrate a commitment to excellence and high quality service to the public among City of Palo Alto officials and employees.

Page 11 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 36


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C3.2.1 Develop a proactive Asset Management Program for infrastructure requirements and costs.

Administrative Services Department/ OMB

M $$ O The project is continuing and will include the evaluation of all known buildings with GHG burning equipment to provide the necessary capital planning required to reach the 80% reduction in Greenhouse Gas consumption by 2030 (80/30 goals of the S/CAP) via the electrification process.

C3.3.1 Periodically evaluate how parks and recreational facilities are being used and develop strategies for improving their use overall.


IP $ O Staff regularly analyze programs and solicit feedback from program participants and use that information to improve programs and provide desired amenities.

C3.3.2 Study and recommend methods of private and public financing for improved park maintenance, rehabilitation, and construction of facilities, including those used for arts and culture.


S $ O The Junior Museum and Zoo (JMZ) is an example of public private partnership for constructing the new JMZ.The “Friendship Trail” project is an example of State and private funding improvements to interpretive signage in the Baylands. Parks staff have partnered with the Kiwanis Club on several park maintenance projects (replacing playground fencing, and painting park benches and fences).

C3.3.3 Estimate the costs of retrofitting all park facilities with water efficient appliances, fixtures and irrigation systems and develop an implementation schedule to phase-in use of non-potable water conservations measures where and when feasible.

Public Works Department and Community Services Department

L $$ O This is an ongoing effort. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

Goal C-3: Recognize the intrinsic value and everyday importance of our parks and community centers, libraries, civic buildings and cultural assets by investing in their maintenance and improvement.

Page 12 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 37


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C3.3.4 Periodically assess the need to adjust parkland dedication or fees in lieu thereof to ensure they remain proportional to real estate values in Palo Alto.

Planning and Development Services and Community Services Department

R $ C City Council raised development impact fees for parks, libraries, and community centers in April 2021 based on the findings of a Park Community Center, and Library Development Impact Fee Justification Study.

C4.1.1 Explore opportunities to dedicate City-owned land as parkland to protect and preserve its community- serving purpose into the future.


S $$$ P The Parks and Recreation Commission and staff have explored some opportunities to dedicate City-owned land as parkland. Staff have not pursued dedicating any new parkland this year.

C4.1.2 Encourage dedication of new land for parks through regulations and incentives for new development and programs to solicit bequests of land within the city.

Community Services Department and Planning and Development Services


C4.1.3 Pursue opportunities to create linear parks over the Caltrain tracks in the event the tracks are moved below grade.


L $$$ P Work has not commenced.

C4.1.4 Explore ways to dedicate a portion of in-lieu fees towards acquisition of parkland, not just improvements.



Goal C-4: Plan for a future in which our parks, open spaces, libraries, public art, and community facilities thrive and adapt to the growth and change of Palo Alto.

Page 13 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 38


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C4.5.1 Use Cubberley Community Center as a critical and vital part of the City’s service delivery system while also planning for its future.


IP $$ O The Cubberley Concept Plan provides a vision for the future of this vital community asset. The CEQA analysis was expected to be completed in 2020, but was delayed due to new guidelines for assessing impacts related to traffic and transportation, which will require an amendment to the consultant’s contract. The contract has now been amended and the analysis is being finalized.

C5.1.1 Allocate resources to create and support initiatives to increase the health and well-being of the public.


R $ O The City provided opportunities for the community to access programs and resources such as, Wellness Wednesdays, ArtLift, Uplift Local. The Palo Alto Art Center’s Creative Attention exhibition and public program series will focus on individual and community wellbeing, with free public programs for all.

C5.1.2 Establish a community-sourced online clearinghouse of information and activities related to health promotion in the community.


IP $ O Community resources related to health and wellness have been provided through the City Manager’s Office as part of COVID response and communication and on the City's new website.

Goal C-5: Sustain the health, well-being, recreation, and safety of residents and visitors, and improve the quality, quantity, and affordability of social services for all community members, including children, youth, teens, seniors, the unhoused, and people with disabilities.

Page 14 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 39


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C5.6.1 Incorporate health and well-being topics, including arts and culture, into existing events and programs at City- owned park and recreation facilities.


R $ O Events this year are almost exclusively focused on brining the community back together to improve connections, and improve wellbeing. The City and many local partners hosted a weeklong celebration in September called Together Again with this goal in mind. The Clay and Glass Festival on 9/11 and 9/12 drew more than 7,000 people to the Art Center grounds. The Art Center's new exhibit, Creative Attention: Art and Community Restoration features the work of artists and showcases alternatives to our chaotic world of stress and anxiety, through practices of mending, healing, restoration, belonging, sustainability, and resiliency.

C5.6.2 Work with schools and community organizations to provide programs that educate residents, workers and visitors on health and well-being topics.


R $$ O Community resources related to health and wellness have been provided through the City Manager’s Office as part of COVID response. A series of Wellness Wednesday events provide information to residents on relevant wellness topics. Community Services Department staff have been coordinating with local nonprofits who serve vulnerable residents. The Art Center’s free Creative Attention Community Day event on 4/10 will include opportunities for local nonprofits to table and provide information about health and wellbeing services in the community.

Page 15 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 40


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


C5.9.1 Identify existing and potential indoor and outdoor locations for community gardens and farmers markets at City-owned or leased facilities and spaces.


M $ O The Community Services Department continues to manage the City's community garden program. There are currently five community gardens in the program.

G1.1.1 Consider making data available at a transactional level on the Open Data Portal.


R $$ C This task is completed. All Building Permit Applications are available for viewing on our Open Data Portal. See link: https://data.cityofpaloalto.org/dashboards/7712/development-center-permits/

G1.2.1 Continue to hold regular, Town Hall-style meetings in neighborhoods.

City Council & City Clerk’s Office

R $$ O We continue to regularly hold meetings on the first 3 Mondays of the month for City Council meetings. Standing Committees, Boards and Commissions meetings are held at a regular scheduled date With the pandemic

G1.2.2 Periodically review the suite of engagement options used to solicit citizen input and expertise on policy issues.

City Manager’s Office

R $-$$$ O The Communications Team updated the Policy and Services Committee in 2021 about planned community engagement.

G1.2.3 Continue to rely on neighborhood organizations, the City website, local media, online technologies and other communication platforms to keep residents informed of current issues and to encourage citizen engagement.


R $ O Staff is working on upcoming Town Hall meetings as well as other community engagement and intends to continue to collaborate with the neighborhood organizations.

Governance Chapter

Goal G-1: Effective opportunities for public participation in local government.

Page 16 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 41


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


G1.2.4 Provide access to communications technologies at City facilities, including public libraries and City Hall, and explore innovative locations for communication.


R $$ O City facilities are opening back up to the public and staff continues to make the spaces available to the public as safely as possible. Additionally, staff is implementing a Virtual Receptionist "Alice "in the City Hall Lobby to assist the public upon entering the building.

G1.2.5 Continue to release City Council staff reports to the public up to 10 days prior to Council hearings to increase public awareness of City decision-making.

City Clerk’s Office R $ O We continue to release City Council staff reports up to 10 days prior to City Council meetings, with the exception of amended agenda items which are provided on the Thursdays before the meeting (latest).

G2.2.1 Continue to offer the use of City facilities to non-profit civic, environmental, cultural, neighborhood and social service organizations for meetings and events at discounted or complimentary rates and via sponsorship programs.


R $ O Ongoing though COVID-19 impacts access to the inside of facilities.

G4.1.1 Continue and expand volunteer opportunities and the community’s awareness of public and nonprofit organizations serving the City.

City Manager's Office

R $ O City continues to work with established Advisory Groups.

G4.1.2 Publicly recognize the efforts of individuals, groups, and businesses that provide volunteer services within the City.


R $ O This is an ongoing task.

G4.1.3 Coordinate with the Palo Alto Unified School District to develop classroom-based leadership, governance and civic participation programs.


M $$ O This is an ongoing task. The City regularly meets with PAUSD leadership and discusses recent issues of interest to both organizations.

Goal G-2: Informed and involved civic, cultural, environmental, social service and neighborhood organizations and residents.

Goal G-4: Active involvement of local citizens as volunteers.

Page 17 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 42


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


G4.1.4 Support the transition from school-based volunteering to civic participation via outreach to parent volunteers and student leaders.

City Manager’s Office and Community Services Department

M $ O This is an ongoing task.

G4.1.5 Coordinate with the real estate community to develop a welcome package for new residents, containing City resources, information and ways to contribute to livability.


M $$ PC The City Manager’s Office works with the Utilities Department to send an electronic welcome message to new residents and customers, including businesses. In 2021 this was reviewed and updated.

G6.2.1 Provide clear information across multiple communications platforms to guide citizens and businesses through the City review and approval process.



G6.2.2 Continue and expand customer-oriented process improvement efforts.

All Departments R $$ O Launched online appointment booking system for Development Services in-person and virtual appointments; launched Development Center Virtual Appointments March 2021; Will launch Online Parcel Report Enhancement enabling the public to access related documents and plan sets for planning entitlements and building permit records online w/o visiting the Development Center before end of 2021

G6.2.3 Use the pre-screening process to obtain early feedback from the City Council and the community regarding ordinance changes intended to facilitate specific development proposals.


R $ O This is an ongoing practice.

Goal G-6: More clearly defined procedures, standards, and expectations for development review.

Land Use and Community Design Element

Goal L-1: A compact and resilient city providing residents and visitors with attractive neighborhoods, work places, shopping districts, public facilities, and open spaces.

Page 18 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 43


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L1.6.1 Review regulatory tools available to the City and identify actions to enhance and preserve the livability of residential neighborhoods and the vitality of commercial and employment districts, including improved code enforcement practices.


S $$ O Additional improvements to enable more tailored responses within 311 are underway

L1.8.1 Maintain and update as appropriate the 1985 Land Use Policies Agreement that sets forth the land use policies of the City, Santa Clara County, and Stanford University with regard to Stanford unincorporated lands.

all Departments IP $ O The City meets regularly with Stanford University regarding land use on an ongoing basis. In 2020 and continuing into 2021, the County initiated a process to update the Stanford Community Plan. The County is also preparing an updated Municipal Services Study. Both of these will be reviewed by the City as a stakeholder in unincorporated area land use policies areas within the City's Sphere of Influence and Urban Service Area.

L2.2.1 Explore whether there are appropriate locations to allow small-scale neighborhood-serving retail facilities such as coffee shops and corner stores in residential areas.


M $ O Uplift Local continued through 2021 given variants, and Council directed the continuation of closed streets and exploration of permanent parklets

L2.4.1 Amend the Housing Element to increase housing sites along San Antonio Road between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Road and increase residential densities in Downtown and the California Avenue.


S $ O As part of HE update, staff is focusing on Downtown and Cal Ave. region. However, to meet challenging RHNA numbers sites along San Antonio Road is included by amending this program. Council expanded area along San Antonio Road between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Road to increase housing opportunity areas.

Goal L-2: An enhanced sense of “community” with development designed to foster public life, meet citywide needs and embrace the principles of sustainability.

Page 19 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 44


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L2.4.2 Allow housing at Stanford Shopping Center, provided that adequate parking and vibrant retail is maintained and no reduction of retail square footage results from the new housing.


S $ P Mixed Use development is allowed in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district since 2018. Future housing development requires conversation with tenants and Stanford University. The Housing Element process in 2021-22 will include consideration of this program.

L2.4.3 Allow housing on the El Camino Real frontage of the Stanford Research Park. Explore multi-family housing elsewhere in Stanford Research Park and near the SUMC.


S $ O The City meets regularly with Stanford University regarding land use on an ongoing basis. The Housing Element process in 2021-22 will include consideration of this program.

L2.4.4 Assess non-residential development potential in the Community Commercial, Service Commercial and Downtown Commercial Districts (CC, CS and CD) and the Neighborhood Commercial District (CN), and convert non-retail commercial FAR to residential FAR, where appropriate. Conversion to residential capacity should not be considered in Town and Country Village.


S $ O Conversion of commercial properties to residential and mixed use (residential and commercial) is occurring with pre-screening development applications filed in 2021

L2.4.5 Update the municipal code to include zoning changes that allow a mix of retail and residential uses but no office uses. The intent of these changes would be to encourage a mix of land uses that contributes to the vitality and walkability of commercial centers and transit corridors.


S $ P Vacancy rates continued to increase due to the extension of the pandemic emergency. The Town and Country Village center application was rejected by City Council. In September 2021, Council directed continuation of closure on California Avenue until June 2022, and exploration of permanent parklets and closure of a portion of Ramona Street.

L2.4.6 Explore changing the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) ordinances for both buildings of historic significance and for seismic retrofits so that transferred development rights may only be used for residential capacity.


M $ P This program has not been explored yet. The project commencement is pending the availability of resources.

Page 20 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 45


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L2.4.7 Explore mechanisms for increasing multi-family housing density near multimodal transit centers.


S $$ PC City was awarded the PDA grant and scope refinement began due to loss of other potential grant funding. Housing Element 6th cycle process began and site selection is underway.

L2.4.8 Identify development opportunities for BMR and more affordable market rate housing on publicly owned properties in a way that is integrated with and enhances existing neighborhoods.


S $$ O As part of HE update, staff is looking at City parking lots for potential affordable housing sites.

L2.5.1 Collaborate with PAUSD in exploring opportunities to build housing that is affordable to school district employees.


IP $ O City staff commented on the 231 Grant teacher housing project EIR produced by Santa Clara County (SCC), and the SCC Board of Supervisors certified the EIR and approved the project January 11, 2022. Staff will continue to collaborate regarding construction logistics for the area.

L2.7.1 Review development standards to discourage the net loss of housing units.


S $ P Modifications to zoning code will be proposed to ensure compliance with state law. It will be placed on the work plan for 2022. State no net loss requirements recently extended to 2030.

L2.8.1 Conduct a study to evaluate various possible tools for preventing displacement of existing residents.


M $$ PC Council provided direction in November 2021 regarding renter protection policies, especially focused on cost-burdened low income renters. On January 26, 2022, the Planning and Transportation Commission reviewed and recommended amendments to PAMC Chapter 9.68 on relocation assistance for no fault evictions and Council adopted the emergency and permanent ordinance on January 31, 2022.

Page 21 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 46


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L2.8.2 Develop and implement a system to inventory the characteristics of existing housing units and track changes in those characteristics on a regular basis. Make the information publicly available.



L2.10.1 Collaborate with PAUSD to plan for space to accommodate future school expansions or new school sites, and evaluate zoning space to accommodate new schools.


IP $$ O The lease on existing Cubberley facilities were extended from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2024 to accommodate school district's need.

L3.2.1 Evaluate and implement strategies to prevent conversion of residential and neighborhood-serving retail space to office or short-term vacation rentals.


IP $ PC City's COVID-19 pandemic response continued with strategies to assist commercial businesses.

L.3.5.1 Develop a program to assess and manage both the positive and negative impacts of basement construction in single family homes on the community and the environment, including: § Impacts to the natural environment, such as potential impacts to the tree canopy, groundwater supply or quality, and soil compaction. § Safety issues such as increased surface flooding increased groundwater intrusion with sea level rise, emergency access and egress, or sewage backflows.


S $$ C The Planning Department and Public Works staff monitors secant walls and groundwater levels for all projects.

L4.2.1 Study the overall viability of ground-floor retail requirements in preserving retail space and creating an active street environment, including the types of locations where such requirements are most effective.


M $$ P The City's COVID-19 pandemic response included continuation of parklets and street closures and other assistance.

Goal L-3: Safe, attractive residential neighborhoods, each with its own distinct character and within walking distance of shopping, services, schools, and/or other public gathering places.

Goal L-4: Inviting pedestrian scale centers that offer a variety of retail and commercial services and provide focal points and community gathering places for the city’s residential neighborhoods and employment districts.

Page 22 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 47


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L4.2.2 Evaluate the effectiveness of formula retail limits adopted for California Avenue. Develop incentives for local small businesses where warranted.


M $$ O Effectiveness of formula retail has not been evaluated but as an incentive to small local businesses staff will be working on development of a permanent parklet ordinance under City Council direction in 2022.

L4.2.3 Explore and potentially support new, creative and innovative retail in Palo Alto.


S $$ PC The street closure of University Avenue sunsets in mid-October, and Cal Ave closure is to continue until June 2022. Additional exploration is underway for permanent parklets and closure of a portion of Ramona Street.

L4.4.1 Study the feasibility of using public and private funds to provide and maintain landscaping and public spaces such as parks, plazas, sidewalks and public art within commercial areas.


M $ PC City's ArtLift program launched to fund art projects and experiences in commercial corridors and neighborhoods to help people remain engaged in the arts, reconnect with each other, and recover together as a cohesive community continues to operate.

L4.4.2 Through public/private cooperation, provide well- signed, clean, and accessible restrooms.

Planning and Development Services and Department of Public Works


L4.4.3 Collaborate with merchants to enhance the appearance of streets and sidewalks within all Centers. Encourage the formation of business improvement districts and undertake a proactive program of maintenance, repair, landscaping and enhancement.

Department of Public Works / Urban Forestry Department

R $$ P Work has not commenced.

L4.4.4 Identify priority street improvements that could make a substantial contribution to the character of Centers, such as widening sidewalks, narrowing travel lanes, creating medians, restriping to allow diagonal parking, and planting trees.

Office of Transportation

S $$$ P California Avenue and University Avenue are currently in consideration for enhancements such as street scape projects and/or street closures. Seeking Council direction on planning these areas for future improvements.

Page 23 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 48


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L4.5.1 Revise zoning and other regulations as needed to encourage the preservation of space to accommodate small businesses, start-ups and other services.


M $$ P The project has not commenced. Due to the continued COVID-19 pandemic throughout 2021, the focus remains on temporary outdoor business operations and exploration of a permanent parklet program.

L4.5.2 Consider planning, regulatory, or other incentives to encourage property owners to include smaller office spaces in their buildings to serve small businesses, non-profit organizations, and independent professionals.



L.4.6.1 Explore increasing hotel FAR from 2.0 to 3.0 in the University Avenue/Downtown area and 2.5 in areas outside of Downtown.



L4.8.1 Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan for Downtown. Planning and Development Services

IP $$$ P The City received the ABAG award for preparing a Downtown CAP; however, additional monies were not obtained to enable the full project. Staff is reducing the scope of the project in order to retain and use the grant.

L4.8.2 Study the feasibility of converting parts of University Avenue to a pedestrian zone.

Public Works, Office of Transportation, PDS

M $$ O California Avenue and University Avenue are currently in consideration for enhancements such as street scape projects and/or street closures. Staff is eeking Council direction on planning these areas for future improvements. A RFP to hire consultant for Streetscape project on University Avenue is currently in progress. University Avenue reopened October 15, 2021; on September 13 Council indicated desire to continue Ramona Street block closure and parklets.

L4.9.1 While preserving adequate parking to meet demand, identify strategies to reuse surface parking lots.

Planning and Development Services & Office of Transportation

IP $ O Work is in progress. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

Page 24 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 49


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L4.9.2 Explore adding additional Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for retail at Stanford Shopping Center.


M $ P Work will be started in approximately three years, no change in status to report for 2020.

L4.10.1 Prepare a coordinated area plan for the North Ventura area and surrounding California Avenue area. The plan should describe a vision for the future of the North Ventura area as a walkable neighborhood with multifamily housing, ground floor retail, a public park, creek improvements, and an interconnected street grid. It should guide the development of the California Avenue area as a well-designed mixed use district with diverse land uses and a network of pedestrian-oriented streets.


IP $$$ O The coordinated area plan work is in progress. The City Council has reviewed the plan and provided directions. Staff plans to continue working with the consultants on plan details and environmental work.

L4.10.2 Create regulations for the California Avenue area that encourage the retention or rehabilitation of smaller buildings to provide spaces for existing retail, particularly local, small businesses.


M $$ P Project commencement is pending the availability of resources.

L4.16.1 Maintain distinct neighborhood shopping areas that are attractive, accessible and convenient to nearby residents.


R $ O The PAMC commercial zoning regulations, Retail Preservation Ordinance and proposed Objective Standards ensure these shopping areas are maintained.

L5.1.1 Explore with Stanford University various development options for adding to the Stanford Research Park a diverse mix of uses, including residential, commercial hotel, conference center, commercial space for small businesses and start-ups, retail, transit hub, and other community-supporting services that are compatible with the existing uses, to create a vibrant innovation-oriented community.


M $$ O The City meets regularly with Stanford University regarding land use on an ongoing basis. The Housing Element process in 2021-22 will include consideration of this program.

Goal L-5: High quality employment districts, each with their own distinctive character and each contributing to the character of the city as a whole.

Goal L-6: Well-designed buildings that create coherent development patterns and enhance city streets and public spaces.

Page 25 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 50


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L6.1.1 Promote awards programs and other forms of public recognition for projects of architectural merit that contribute positively to the community.


R $ O The Architectural Review Board (ARB) met September 9, 2021 to kick off the 2020 Awards process. On February 3, 2022, the ARB selected seven award winning projects.

L6.3.1 Develop guidelines for bird-friendly building design that minimizes hazards for birds and reduces the potential for collisions.


M $$ P Staff has not initiated any code change for this program, but provides guidance to project applicants based on best practices for bird-friendly design.

L6.6.1 Modify design standards for mixed use projects to promote a pedestrian-friendly relationship to the street, including elements such as screened parking or underground parking, street-facing windows and entries, and porches, windows, bays and balconies along public ways, and landscaping, and trees along the street. Avoid blank or solid walls at street level.


IP $ O Staff is working on Objective Standards which included public hearings before Architectural Review Board, Planning and Transportation Commission, a community meeting in July 2021, and City Council. The ARB ad hoc committee met many times to refine the graphics for the standards. Council is set to hold multiple meetings on Objective Standards, beginning September 27, 2021, with direction to staff to return in 2022 with responses. Staff held a community meeting on February 1, 2022 and is scheduled to hold a community in March before returning with ordinance revisions/updates to Council.

L6.7.1 Implement architectural standards to assure they effectively address land use transitions.



Goal L-7: Conservation and preservation of Palo Alto’s historic buildings, sites, and districts.

Page 26 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 51


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


Program for Policy L7.2

If a proposed project would substantially affect the exterior of a potential historic resource that has not been evaluated for inclusion into the City’s Historic Resources Inventory, City staff shall consider whether it is eligible for inclusion in State or federal registers prior to the issuance of a demolition or alterations permit. Minor exterior improvements that do not affect the architectural integrity of potentially historic buildings shall be exempt from consideration. Examples of minor improvements may include repair or replacement of features in kind, or other changes that do not alter character-defining features of the building.”


R $ O Policy L 7.2 implementation continues. The passage of SB9 implicates a need to update PAMC 16.49 and local inventory to reference the properties found California Register and National Register Eligible during and since the 1998-2000 history survey.

L7.1.1 Update and maintain the City’s Historic Resource Inventory to include historic resources that are eligible for local, State, or federal listing. Historic resources may consist of a single building or structure or a district.


R $ O The City has not begun the effort to place on the local inventory properties determined to be CRHR and NRHP eligible resources. SB9 passage necessitates commencing this program along with ordinances. Staff is seeking resources from City Council to implement it.

L7.1.2 Reassess the Historic Preservation Ordinance to ensure its effectiveness in the maintenance and preservation of historic resources, particularly in the University Avenue/Downtown area.


M $ P The ordinance needs to be reassessed since it does not protect properties found eligible for National and California Register. The current focus is to implement Program L7.1.1.

L7.8.1 Promote and expand available incentives for the retention and rehabilitation of buildings with historic merit in all zones and revise existing zoning and permit regulations to minimize constraints to adaptive reuse.


S $ PC Rehabilitation is underway for several projects in Palo Alto.

L7.8.2 Create incentives to encourage salvage and reuse of discarded historic building materials.

Planning and Development Services & Department of Public Works

S $ PC The Public Works Department is monitoring the deconstruction ordinance for approved demolitions.

Page 27 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 52


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L7.8.3 Seek additional innovative ways to apply current codes and ordinances to older buildings. Use the State Historical Building Code for designated historic buildings.


R $ O Staff routinely applies the California Historical Building Code to qualified projects as applicable.

L7.12.1 Review parking exceptions for historic buildings in the Zoning Code to determine if there is an effective balance between historic preservation and meeting parking needs.


L $ P Work has not commenced.

L9.1.1 Evaluate existing zoning code setback requirements to ensure they are appropriate for scenic routes.


L $ P To be started in approximately three years, no change in status in 2020.

L9.3.1 Review standards for streets and signage and update as needed to foster natural, tree-lined streets with a minimum of signage.

Planning and Development Services, Office of Transportation & Department of Public Works

M $ O This program is ongoing. There are no updates to report at this time.

L9.6.1 Analyze existing neighborhoods and determine where publicly accessible shared, outdoor gathering spaces are below the citywide standard. Create new public spaces, including public squares, parks and informal gathering spaces in these neighborhoods.


M $$$ P Work has not commenced.

L9.7.1 Develop a strategy to enhance gateway sites with special landscaping, art, public spaces and/or public buildings. Emphasize the creek bridges and riparian settings at the entrances to the City over Adobe Creek and San Francisquito Creek.


R $ P Work has not commenced.

Goal L-9: Attractive, inviting public spaces and streets that enhance the image and character of the city.

Page 28 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 53


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L9.8.1 Establish incentives to encourage native trees and low water use plantings in new development throughout the city.

Planning and Development Services, Office of Transportation & Department of Public Works

M $ O Staff has continued to successfully encourage the planting of native trees and low water use plantings through the use of the ARB findings modified in the 2016 code update (including a focus on regional, indigenous, drought tolerant species). The Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) is implemented by staff review of landscape permits.

L9.10.1 Continue the citywide undergrounding of utility wires. Minimize the impacts of undergrounding on street tree root systems and planting areas.

City of Palo Alto Utilities

R $$$ O The Utilities Department in collaboration with the Urban Forestry division has an ongoing program to underground utility wires, and complies with all City ordinances regarding minimizing impacts of construction on trees.

L9.10.2 Encourage the use of compact and well-designed utility elements, such as transformers, switching devices, backflow preventers and telecommunications infrastructure. Place these elements in locations that will minimize their visual intrusion.


R $ O In addition to safety, reliability and cost-effectiveness, the Utilities Department considers the visual impacts of utility equipment before installation.

L9.11.1 Implement the findings of the City’s Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Committee and its emphasis for rebuilding our civic spaces.

Department of Public Works

IP $$$ O The Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Committee’s findings resulted in City Council’s adoption of the 2014 Council Infrastructure Plan, including ten priority projects. Implementation of the plan is underway, with two of the projects completed, three projects in construction and others in the design process.

Page 29 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 54


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L9.11.2 Identify City-owned properties where combinations of wireless facilities can be co-located, assuming appropriate lease agreements are in place.

City of Palo Alto Utilities & Planning and Development Services

M $ O Utilities has identified five locations for the AMI base collectors: East Meadow Substation, Hale Well, Maybell Substation, Monte Bello Reservoir, and Peers Park Water Pump Station. After Council approves the AMI contract, Utilities will begin the Tier 2 Wireless Communications Facilities application process with Planning.

L9.12.1 Coordinate with regional utility providers on activities that would impact their infrastructure and right-of-way.

City of Palo Alto Utilities, Planning and Development Services and Department of Public Works

R $ O Utilities, Planning and Public Works Departments coordinate with regional utility providers on activities that impact the City’s infrastructure and right of way to ensure they are in compliance with local ordinances and policies.

L10.1.1 Relocate the terminal building away from the Runway 31 clear zone and closer to the hangars, allowing for construction of a replacement terminal.


L $$$ PC The Airport received funding for first phase of the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) project in 2021, which will begin the 18 month study. The final phase of funding is expecting in 2022. The relocation of the terminal will be studied in this project.

L10.1.2 Update the Airport Layout Plan in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration requirements, as needed, while ensuring conformance with the Baylands Master Plan to the maximum extent feasible.


M $$$ PC The Airport received funding for first phase of the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) project in 2021, which will begin the 18 month study. The final phase of funding is expecting in 2022. The project is expected to be completed 2023.

L10.1.3 Identify and pursue funding to address maintenance, safety and security improvements needed at PAO.


R $ O This program is ongoing. There are no updates to report at this time.

Goal L-10: Maintain an economically viable local airport with minimal environmental impacts.

Page 30 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 55


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


L10.3.1 Establish and implement a system for processing, tracking and reporting noise complaints regarding local airport operations on an annual basis,


S $$ O Since the City began tracking complaints in 2014, the Annual Aircraft Noise Complaints Report is completed each January and submitted to City Council.

L10.3.2 Work with the airport to pursue opportunities to enhance the open space and habitat value of the airport. These include:Maintaining native grasses;Reconstructing levees to protect the airport from sea level rise while enhancing public access and habitat conservation; andEvaluating the introduction of burrowing owl habitat. This program is subject to federal wildlife hazard requirements and guidelines for airports.

Community Services Department and Department of Public Works

R $$ P Work has not commenced.

L10.4.1 Continue to provide a bicycle/pedestrian path adjacent to Embarcadero Road, consistent with the Baylands Master Plan and open space character of the baylands subject to federal and State airport regulations.

Department of Public Works and Office of Transportation

R $ O There is an existing bicycle/pedestrian path adjacent to portions of Embarcadero Road (installed in 2000) that Rangers continue to maintain.

N1.1.1 Develop Comprehensive Resource Conservation Plans for the Pearson Arastradero Preserve, Esther Clark Preserve, and Foothills Park to steward the protection of local ecosystems.


S-M $$$ P Conservation Plans for Pearson Arastradero, Esther Clark, and Foothills Nature Preserves are currently not funded in the CIP.

Natural Environment Element

Goal N-1: Protect, conserve and enhance Palo Alto’s citywide system of open space, including connected and accessible natural and urban habitats, ecosystems, and natural resources, providing a source of public health, natural beauty and enjoyment for Palo Alto residents.

Page 31 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 56


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N1.1.2 Promote and support ecosystem protection and environmental education programs in Palo Alto and neighboring school districts.


S $ O Palo Alto Open Space partners with Grassroots Ecology and Save the Bay (volunteer-based habitat restoration organizations) to provide over 50 habitat restoration programs in our open space preserves each year. In FY20, there were 2,354 volunteer hours for a total of 7,472 volunteer hours. The Junior Museum and Zoo also provides science outreach programs in local schools.

N1.3.1 Work to maintain Williamson Act agricultural preserve contracts within the City.


S $ O The parcels under Williamson Act contract are reviewed by the City Council every year and extended for an additional one year term if the property owners choses to continue it.

N1.3.2 Provide information and support programs that encourage residents to enhance their private yards with native plant species and low impact landscaping.

Department of Public Works / Urban Forestry Department

R $$ O Tree and landscape use of native plants is encouraged during Individual Reviews of landscape plans for residential projects. The South Palo Alto Tree Planting Initiative is also ongoing. Funding is provided to the non-profit organization Canopy to plant native and/or climate adapted trees on private properties. Each tree is inventoried on the open source platform so that it can be monitored.

N1.4.1 Periodically review California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) thresholds of significance regarding special status species to identify changes in listed species recommended by professionally recognized scientific experts.


R $ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

Page 32 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 57


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N1.4.2 Explore the feasibility of expanding the use of overlay tools such as the Site and Design (D) Review Combining District or similar development review and restriction tools to protect special-status species and their habitats from development.



N1.4.3 Assess opportunities to expand habitats of special – status species within publicly-owned open spaces.


R $$ O Palo Alto Open Space partners with Grassroots Ecology and Save the Bay (volunteer-based habitat restoration organizations) to provide over 50 habitat restoration programs in our open space preserves each year. Work has not commenced yet, but The Baylands Conservation Plan, which is currently under CEQA review, provides some analysis on habitat improvement in the Baylands Nature Preserve.

N1.5.1 Maintain the value of local wetlands as habitats by ensuring adequate flow from the Bay and minimizing effluent.


R $ P Work has not commenced. The Baylands Conservation Plan includes a recommendation to improve tidal flow to the Renzel Marsh.

N1.6.1 Continue to coordinate City review, particularly by Planning, Public Works and Community Services Departments, of projects that might impact the City’s foothills and hillside areas.


R $$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

N1.7.1 Examine and improve existing management practices, including the provision of access to open space for City vehicles and equipment, to ensure that natural resources are protected.


R $$ O Open Space staff are careful to only utilize vehicles and equipment where necessary and with an intent to protect the natural resources.

Page 33 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 58


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N1.7.2 Protect wildlife in public open space areas by improving litter collection, restricting the use of non- recyclable plastics, prohibiting the feeding of wild, feral and stray animals in open space, and enforcing dog leash laws.


R $ O Feeding wild, feral, and stray animals in Open Space was prohibited on June 9, 2014. Litter collection is accomplished through staff and volunteers. Rangers enforce the dog leash laws.

N1.7.3 Provide information about responsible behavior in environmentally-sensitive areas through signage, pamphlets and documents on the City’s website.


R $ O The Rangers educate park visitors through signage, interpretive programs, and information on the City webpage. Additional signage and educational materials were created specifically for use at Foothills Nature Preserve when it opened to nonresidents.

N1.7.4 Review and map existing easements and maintenance roads for potential trails and trail connections.


S $$ P Work has not commenced.

N1.10.1 Use City funds and seek additional sources of funding, including State and federal programs, to finance open space acquisition, maintenance or conservation.


R $ O This is an ongoing effort, no updates to report at this time.

N1.10.2 Create mechanisms to monitor, assess and respond quickly to land acquisition opportunities that would expand or connect the City’s system of parks and open spaces, and establish a long-term funding strategy for acquisition that would enable the City to move quickly when opportunities arise.


S $$$ O The Parks and Recreation Commission has created an Ad Hoc committee focused on identifying funding opportunities for parks, recreation and open space projects, including land acquisitions.

Page 34 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 59


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N2.1.1 Explore ways to prevent and ameliorate damage to trees and tree roots by above and below ground infrastructure and buildings.



N2.2.1 Periodically update the UFMP and Tree Protection Ordinance to ensure policies and regulations remain relevant set leading standards for tree health practices.


R $$ O This is an ongoing program, tree ordinance updates are currently being proposed (10/21).

N2.4.1 Promote landscape design that optimizes soil volume, porosity, structure and health, as well the location, shape and configuration of soil beds.

Planning and Development Services and Urban Forestry

M $ O This is an ongoing task. Collaborative review with Urban Forestry staff of major projects is conducted through Architectural Review Board.

N2.7.1 Maintain and irrigate healthy trees in parks, open space, parking lots, and City rights-of-way, while identifying and replacing unhealthy trees in those areas.


S $$ O This is an ongoing program. Summer time watering of newly planted street trees by city staff continues.

N2.7.2 Continue to invest in the care, irrigation and monitoring of street trees during drought conditions.


R $$ O This is an ongoing program. Summer time watering of newly planted street trees by city staff continues.

N2.7.3 Actively pursue funding for tree planting to increase canopy cover significantly across the city, avoid a net loss of canopy at the neighborhood level, and attain canopy size targets in parks, open space, parking lots, and City rights-of-way.



N2.9.1 Increase awareness, severity and enforcement of penalties for tree damage.


M $ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

N2.9.2 Develop a program for using the City’s Urban Forestry Fund to replace trees lost to public improvement and infrastructure projects, with replanting occurring onsite or as close to the original site as is ecologically appropriate.


M $$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

Goal N-2: A thriving urban forest that provides public health, ecological, economic, and aesthetic benefits for Palo Alto.

Page 35 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 60


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N2.10.1 Continue to require replacement of trees, including street trees lost to new development.

Planning and Development Services & Urban Forestry Department

R $ O This is an ongoing requirement as part of the architectural review and other development review processes. Replacement trees are required to ensure ‘no net loss of canopy’.

N2.10.2 As part of the update of the Tree and Landscape Technical Manual, consider expanding tree protections to include additional mature trees and provide criteria for making site-specific determinations of trees that should be protected.


S $ PC The Tree and Landscape Technical Manual has been updated. Final changes and City Manager review and approval of the manual are pending the outcome of proposed changes to Title 8 of Palo Alto Municipal Code.

N2.10.3 Consider revisions to the appeals process to increase transparency regarding tree removals and expanded opportunities for community members to appeal the removal of trees.


L $$ PC Changes proposed to Palo Alto Municipal Code will initiate revisions to the appeals process for tree removals if adopted.

N2.11.1 Develop a transparent and publicly accessible street tree removal and replacement schedule.


M $ P There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N2.11.2 Develop a program to replace unhealthy public trees over time. Department of Public Works

M $$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

N2.12.1 Explore ways to leverage the fact that Palo Alto’s urban forest alleviates climate change by capturing and storing carbon dioxide.



N2.13.1 Work with local nonprofits to establish one or more tree planting programs that are consistent with the UFMP, and rely on locally native, resilient species. Review existing tree planting guidelines to ensure they achieve these objectives.


S $$ PC The South Palo Alto Tree Planting Program continues, there are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N2.13.2 Provide on-going education for City staff, residents, and developers regarding landscape, maintenance, and irrigation practices that protect the urban forest and wildlife species.


R $ P There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

Page 36 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 61


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N2.13.3 Involve tree owners in tree maintenance programs. Planning and Development Services and Urban Forestry

R $ O There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N2.13.4 Cooperate with the Palo Alto Unified School District, Stanford University, Caltrain, Caltrans, Pacific Gas & Electric, and other public and private entities to ensure that their tree planting, tree removal, and maintenance practices are consistent with City guidelines.


R $ P There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N3.3.1 Update the Stream Corridor Protection Ordinance to explore 150 feet as the desired stream setback along natural creeks in open space and rural areas west of Foothill Expressway. This 150-foot setback would prohibit the siting of buildings and other structures, impervious surfaces, outdoor activity areas and ornamental landscaped areas within 150 feet of the top of a creek bank. Allow passive or intermittent outdoor activities and pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle pathways along natural creeks where there are adequate setbacks to protect the natural riparian environment. Within the setback area, provide a border of native riparian vegetation at least 30 feet along the creek bank.The update to the Stream Protection Ordinance should establish:Design recommendations for development or redevelopment of sites within the setback, consistent with basic creek habitat objectives and significant net improvements in the condition of the creek.Conditions under which single-family property and existing development are exempt from the 150-foot setbackAppropriate setbacks and creek conservation measures for undeveloped parcels.


S $$ P This program would be started in the next 2-4 years.

Goal N-3: Conservation of both natural and channelized creeks and riparian areas as open space amenities, natural habitat areas, and elements of community design.

Page 37 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 62


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N3.3.2 Examine the development regulations of the Stream Corridor Protection Ordinance, with stakeholder involvement to establish appropriate setback requirements that reflect the varying natural and channelized conditions along creeks east of Foothill Expressway. Ensure that opportunities to provide an enhanced riparian setback along urban creeks as properties are redeveloped or improved are included in this evaluation.


S $$ P This program would be started in the next 2-4 years.

N3.3.3 For all creeks, update the Stream Corridor Protection Ordinance to minimize impacts on wildlife by:Limiting the development of recreational trails to one side of natural riparian corridors.Requiring careful design of lighting surrounding natural riparian corridors to maximize the distance between nighttime lighting and riparian corridorsand direct lighting away from the riparian corridor.


S $$ O Lighting near riparian areas is reviewed as a part of the CEQA process.

N3.4.1 Develop a community creek stewardship program to promote existing creek clean-up days, organize new events, and increase appreciation of riparian corridors.


M $$ O Continue to work with Grassroots Ecology who manage a creek stewardship and education program.

N3.6.1 Review and update the Grading Ordinance to ensure that it adequately protects creeks from the erosion and sedimentation impacts of grading.


M $$ PC Stormwater ordinance will be updated in 2022.

N3.8.1 Work with the SCVWD to develop a maintenance, restoration and enhancement improvement program that preserves flood protection while preserving riparian habitat, and identifies specific stretches of corridor to be restored or daylighted, standards to be achieved, and sources of funding. Include provisions for tree and vegetation planting to enhance natural habitat and shade cover.


M $$ PC Limited progress has been made, except for the work on the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan.

N3.8.2 Participate cooperatively in the JPA to achieve increased flood protection, habitat preservation, enhancement and improved recreational opportunities along San Francisquito Creek.


IP $ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

Page 38 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 63


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N4.2.1 Educate customers on efficient water use (indoor and outdoor), tree care, and landscaping options.

City of Palo Alto Utilities & Department of Public Works

R $ O The City in partnership with Valley Water offers a suite of water efficiency programs including landscape conversion rebates, indoor and outdoor survey kits, graywater laundry to landscape rebates, irrigation system rebates and rain barrel rebates. The City offers a variety of workshops on water efficiency and plant care throughout the year.

N4.5.1 Study the supply and quality of local groundwater aquifers to better understand their utility as natural water storage.

City of Palo Alto Utilities & Department of Public Works

S $ O Council accepted the Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan in 2020 that included the characterization of hydrogeologic conditions in the region. In 2021, the City will work on a One Water Plan that will analyze all water sources within the City.

N4.5.2 Work with local public agencies to educate residents regarding the public health, fire, and overall quality of life risks associated with long-term drought.

City of Palo Alto Utilities, Department of Public Works & Office of Emergency Services

R $ O The City engages in public outreach and provides information on the City website about the importance of making water conservation a way of life.

N4.6.1 Encourage residents to use rain barrels or other rainwater reuse systems.


S $ O Expanded outreach on rain barrel rebates with Valley Water.

Goal N-4: Water resources and infrastructure that are managed to sustain plant and animal life, support urban activities, and protect public health and safety.

Page 39 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 64


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N4.7.1 Support and participate in the work of the SCVWD to prepare a high-quality groundwater management plan that will address groundwater supply and quality, including, as appropriate:An understanding of subsurface hydrology.Strategies to reduce depletion.Opportunities to recharge groundwater, including through use of recycled water and extracted groundwater.Methods to ensure that uncontaminated, toxin-free groundwater is used in a manner that benefits the community, for example in irrigation of parks, street cleaning, and dust suppression.An approach to metering extracted groundwater.


S $ O City staff continues to work with Valley Water on the monitoring of groundwater and map the toxic plumes in our region.

N4.7.2 Support the SCVWD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to implement their mandate to protect groundwater from the adverse impacts of urban uses.


S $ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

N4.7.3 Work with the SCVWD and RWQCB to identify and map key groundwater recharge and stormwater management areas for use in land use planning and permitting and the protection of groundwater resources.


IP $ O Staff finalized the Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) plan; now refining the plan to determine the best locations for GSI in the future and how to maintain the features to protect groundwater resources.

N4.8.1 Research and promote new construction techniques and recharge strategies developed to reduce subsurface and surface water impacts and comply with City dewatering policies.


IP $ O City is still monitoring the groundwater impacts with different construction techniques to determine if the City dewatering policies require modification.

N4.8.2 Explore appropriate ways to monitor all excavations and other projects to ensure that dewatering does not result in recharge into the aquifer where needed.


S $ O Staff is working with a consultant to refine how the City monitors the dewatering projects.

Page 40 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 65


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N4.10.1 Monitor and implement practices for reducing water pollution. Examples include state-of-the-art best management practices (BMPs), land use planning approaches, and construction of modern stormwater management facilities.


R $$$ PC Stormwater ordinance will be updated in 2022.

N4.10.2 Continue public education programs on water quality issues, including BMPs for residents, businesses, contractors, and City employees.


R $ O This work continues via flyers, tabling, bill inserts, targeted messages and the website.

N4.10.3 Implement swift and rigorous spill response, cleanup, and follow-up investigation procedures to reduce the impacts of toxic spills on the city’s creeks and San Francisco Bay.


R $$ PC Stormwater ordinance will be updated in 2022.

N4.10.4 Increase monitoring and enforcement of existing prohibitions on materials and practices known to impact local water quality, such as use of copper, in the design and construction industries.


R $ PC Stormwater ordinance will be updated in 2022.

N4.11.1 Evaluate neighborhoods where parking controls may hinder street sweeping and recommend any changes that are needed.


M $ PC There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N4.12.1 Implement the City’s Integrated Pest Management Policy with periodic assessments of pesticide use and use of BMPs to reduce pesticide applications and toxicity, and maximize non-chemical control.


R $ O Continue to implement the City's Integrated Pest Management Policy

N4.12.2 Revise the City’s Tree and Landscape Technical Manual to include stronger requirements for least-toxic practices in the landscape permitting process.


S $ PC There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N4.12.3 Promote the value of toxin-free landscape management, and educate residents about the impacts of common fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides and pesticides on local water quality.


R $ O This is an ongoing effort. Staff continues to educate residents and businesses regarding proper pest control.

N4.13.1 Promote the use of permeable paving materials or other design solutions that allow for natural percolation and site drainage through a Storm Water Rebate Program and other incentives.


S $ O The stormwater rebate program was revamped in partnership with Valley Water.

Page 41 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 66


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N4.13.2 Develop and implement a green stormwater infrastructure plan with the goal to treat and infiltrate stormwater.


S $$$ O Currently implementing the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan.

N4.13.3 Mitigate flooding through improved surface permeability or paved areas, and stormwater capture and storage.


S $$ O This is an ongoing effort. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N4.14.1 Establish a standardized process for evaluating the impacts of development on the storm drainage system, including point source discharge, base flow and peak flow.


S $ O Projects that require a building permit are reviewed by Public Works staff to verify that the proposed runoff from project sites is equal to or less than the existing runoff. Any excess flow must be detained or retained on-site.

N4.14.2 Complete improvements to the storm drainage system consistent with the priorities outlined in the City's Storm Drainage Master Plan, as amended.


IP $$$ O Storm Drainage Master Plan projects are being implemented through the Capital Improvement Program using funding from the Stormwater Management Fee.

N4.15.1 Work with commercial and industrial dischargers to identify and implement pollution prevention measures and BMPs to eliminate or reduce the discharge of metals and other pollutants of concern.


R $$ O This is ongoing task. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N4.15.2 Encourage commercial dischargers to consistently go beyond minimum requirements of the Clean Bay Business Program.


R $ PC Stormwater ordinance will be updated in 2022.

N4.16.1 Implement approved recommendations based on the Long-Term Facilities Plan prepared for the RWQCP.


IP $$$ O Design complete for the Outfall Project, Primary Sedimentation Tank Rehabilitation and reviewing design for the Secondary Treatment process. Started construction on the Primary Sedimentation Tank Rehabilitation Project.

Page 42 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 67


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N4.16.2 Develop a plan to address ongoing operations of the RWQCP taking potential sea level rise and growth in surrounding communities into account.


M $$$ O A Sea Level Rise vulnerability assessment is being completed and RWQCP raises all electrical equipment due to Sea Level Rise Policy.

N4.17.1 Evaluate the expansion of existing recycled water infrastructure to serve a larger area. Develop a plan to install “purple pipe” when streets are opened for other infrastructure work.


M $$ O Council accepted the Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan in 2020. A plan to coordinate the installation of purple pipe when streets are open has not been developed and is not currently in the work plan.

N4.17.2 Evaluate the possibility of using recycled water as an emergency water supply.


L $ O Using recycled water as an emergency water supply is not under consideration.

N4.17.3 Investigate ways to reuse non-traditional water sources including recycled, gray, black and storm water.


R $ PC Council accepted the Northwest County Recycled Water Strategic Plan in 2020. The 2020 S/CAP update is underway, and a key action is to develop a plan for implementing a One Water portfolio. The One Water approach to integrated water resource planning will take a broader, more comprehensive look at water supply options including recycled water and other non-traditional water sources.

N5.1.1 Provide City input on significant proposals for air quality legislation and state implementation plans.


R $ O Planning Department works with the City lobbyist to identify issues and provides ideas.

N5.1.2 Implement BAAQMD recommended standards for the design of buildings near heavily traveled roads, in order to minimize exposure to auto-related emissions.


S $ O Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) standards are implemented through the CEQA process.

Goal N-5: Clean, healthful air for Palo Alto and the San Francisco Bay Area.

Page 43 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 68


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N5.1.3 Explore adopting new standards that target the reduction of very fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which is associated with increased impacts on health.


S $ O PM2.5 standards are implemented through the CEQA process.

N5.2.1 Promote understanding of the impacts of extended idling on air quality, for residents, auto-dependent businesses, and schools.



N5.2.2 Consider adopting and enforcing penalties for drivers that idle for longer than 3-5 minutes.


M $ P Project not commenced yet.

N5.3.1 Cooperatively work with Santa Clara County and the BAAQMD to ensure that mining and industrial operations mitigate environmental and health impacts.


R $ O Industrial operations are mitigated through the CEQA process. There are no mining resources within the City limits.

N5.3.2 Monitor particulate emissions at local California Air Resources Board monitoring stations and make the information easily available to citizens.


R $ O Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) provides monitoring information on their webpage - http://www.baaqmd.gov/about-air-quality/current-air-quality.

N5.3.3 Promote understanding of the health impacts of particulate emissions and provide information to residents and businesses about steps they can take to reduce particulate emissions, such as reducing or eliminating wood burning or using low emission alternatives to wood-burning stoves and fireplaces.



N5.3.4 Explore feasible and cost-effective opportunities to reduce concrete and asphalt use by the City, in parks and other public projects.


R $ O There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

N6.3.1 Continue working to reduce noise impacts created by events and activities taking place in communities adjoining Palo Alto.



Goal N-6: An environment that minimizes the adverse impacts of noise.

Page 44 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 69


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N6.3.2 Evaluate the feasibility of adopting noise criteria in the purchase of new City vehicles and equipment.



N6.3.3 Update the Noise Ordinance, as needed, to provide for clear interpretation of the regulations, to review the effectiveness of existing standards, and to ensure that regulations address contemporary issues.


S $ P This program would be started in the next 2-4 years.

N6.7.1 Update noise impact review procedures in the Noise Ordinance and the Zoning Code to address appropriate requirements for analysis and thresholds for impacts on residential land uses and publicly-owned conservation land.


S $ P This program would be started in the next 2-4 years.

N6.10.1 Evaluate changes to the Noise Ordinance to further reduce the impacts of noise from leaf blowers and residential power equipment.


M $ P This program would be started in the next 2-4 years.

N6.11.1 For larger development projects that demand intensive construction periods and/or use equipment that could create vibration impacts, such as the Stanford University Medical Center or major grade separation projects, require a vibration impact analysis, as well as formal, ongoing monitoring and reporting of noise levels throughout the entire construction process pertinent to industry standards. The monitoring plan should identify hours of operation and could include information on the monitoring locations, durations and regularity, the instrumentation to be used and appropriate noise control measures to ensure compliance with the noiseordinance.


R $ O Construction noise and vibration are reviewed as part of the CEQA process. Mitigation measures, including limited hours of operation, are used to reduce noise and vibration impacts.

N6.12.1 Continue working to reduce noise associated with operations of the Palo Alto Airport. Also, ensure compliance with the land use compatibility standards for community noise environments, shown in Table N- 1, by prohibiting incompatible land use development within the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of the airport.


R $$ O No updates at this time.

Page 45 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 70


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N6.12.2 Participate in appropriate public forums and engage with other governmental agencies and representatives to ensure that activities at airports in the region do not negatively affect noise levels in Palo Alto.


IP $ O Staff monitors current procedures into and out of the Palo Alto Airport. If other procedural changes are identified unrelated to the Palo Alto Airport, staff notifies City Manager’s Office.

N6.13.1 Encourage the Peninsula Corridors Joint Powers Board to pursue technologies and grade separations that would reduce or eliminate the need for train horns/whistles in communities served by rail service.


IP $ O Currently the efforts are toward developing alternatives for grade separation, therefore no substantial action for this item.

N6.13.2 Evaluate changing at-grade rail crossings so that they qualify as Quiet Zones based on Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) rules and guidelines in order to mitigate the effects of train horn noise without adversely affecting safety at railroad crossings.


S $$$ O Currently the efforts are toward developing alternatives for grade separation, therefore no substantial action for this item.

N6.13.3 Participate in future environmental review of the California High-Speed Rail (HSR) Project, planned to utilize existing Caltrain track through Palo Alto, to ensure that it adheres to noise and vibration mitigation measures.


S $$ O The City provided comprehensive comments on the California High-Speed Rail (HSR) Environmental Impact Report in 2020. This is an ongoing effort.

N7.1.1 Meet customer electricity needs with least total cost resources after careful assessment of environmental cost and benefits.


R $ O Council approved the REC Exchange Program in August 2020, which authorizes staff to sell some of the City's valuable in-state renewable energy and exchange it for lower cost out-of-state renewable energy. The savings from this program (~$2M-$3M/yr) are to be split between rate relief and funding for local decarbonization efforts (e.g. incentives for building electrification).

Goal N-7: A clean, efficient energy supply that makes use of cost-effective renewable resources.

Page 46 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 71


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N7.2.1 Promote the adoption of cost-effective, renewable energy technologies from diverse renewable fuel sources by all customers.


S $ O Council approved the REC Exchange Program in August 2020, which authorizes staff to sell some of the City's valuable in-state renewable energy and exchange it for lower cost out-of-state renewable energy. The savings from this program (~$2M-$3M/yr) are to be split between rate relief and funding for local decarbonization efforts (e.g. incentives for building electrification).

N7.2.2 Assess the feasibility of using life cycle analysis and total cost of ownership analysis for public and private projects, funded by the project proponent, in order to minimize the consumption of energy, the production of greenhouse gases, including GHG emissions of construction materials and demolition and costs over the life of the project.


M $$ O To date, we have completed the analyses to compare the energy use and annual bill of gas furnace versus heat pump system for the pilot. The planning entitlement and building permits have been issued. Construction will For the rooftop gas pack electrification project, the facility manager has secured project funding and has also selected a contractor. Staff will develop a case study for this project with cost estimates and lessons learned.

N7.4.1 Continue timely incorporation of State and federal energy efficiency standards and policies in relevant City codes, regulations and procedures, and higher local efficiency standards that are cost-effective.

Planning and Development Services and Building Services

R $ O Staff is reviewing the 2020 version of Stand-Alone Detached ADU Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and planning on bringing forth to Council an associated All- Electric Mandate in April 2022. Moving forward, staff will continue to participate in the California Energy Codes & Standards 2023 Reach Code Cost-Effectiveness Analysis efforts. Once the final analysis are complete for each building type staff will review the analysis, determine feasible energy reach efforts, perform public outreach and bring forth new a new 2023 Energy Reach Code Ordinance for adoption. We are currently targeting late Fall 2022 for adoption.

Page 47 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 72


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N7.4.2 Implement cost effective energy efficiency programs for all customers, including low income customers.


R $ O The Utilities Department continues to provide programs around energy conservation and efficiency to all customers, including low-income customers.

N7.4.3 Incorporate cost-effective energy conservation measures into construction, maintenance, and City operation and procurement practices.


R $$ O Public Works expects to bring the contract for the Facility Condition and Electrification Assessment to Council approval in December 2021 and the final report for the electrification assessment will be completed in Q3 2022. The report will cover the location and age of natural gas-fired equipment in city facilities, and the cost for like-for-like replacement versus gas-to-electric replacement.

N7.4.4 Implement gas and electric rate structures that encourage efficient use of resources while meeting State law requirements that rates be based on the cost of service.


M $ O The Utilities Department continues to implement gas and electric rate structures that meet this program goal.

N7.4.5 Continue to provide public education programs addressing energy conservation and efficiency.


R $ O The Utilities Department continues to provide public education programs around energy conservation and efficiency.Utilities Department has also started to promote electrification to raise public awareness on the benefits of building electrification and electric vehicles.

Page 48 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 73


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N7.5.1 Monitor professional and medically-sound research and studies on light-emitting diodes (LEDs).


M $ O The Utilities Department promotes voluntary conversion to LED lighting in buildings, while the Building Division requires its use in new development. The Utilities Department also maintains LED street lights for the City. The Utilities Department promotes the use of warm white rather than cool white LEDs to avoid blue light phototoxicity concerns. The Department uses LED street light luminaires that minimize light pollution.

N7.6.1 Explore changes to building and zoning codes to incorporate solar energy, energy storage and other energy efficiency measures into major development projects, including City-owned projects.


S $ O Staff has shorten review timelines on electrification projects as staff resources allow. We have also implemented a daily tracking report that informs department managers of late and pending reviews. This tracking report is monitored daily by the Development Services Permitting Manager and Department Managers. Exploring outside technology such as Solar App+ as an alternative to submitted qualified applications. We are also working collaboratively with out side stakeholders to update and our associated submittal, plan review and field checklist/guidelines.

N7.6.2 Promote use of the top floors of new and existing structured automobile garages for installation of photovoltaic panels and green roofs.


S $ O This effort is ongoing

N7.6.3 Promote solar energy in individual private projects. City of Palo Alto Utilities, Planning and Development Services and Building Services

R $ O Streamlining of residential and commercial building applications is ongoing.

Page 49 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 74


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N7.7.1 Evaluate the potential for a cost-effective plan for transitioning to a completely carbon-neutral natural gas supply.


S $ O Staff monitors the market for innovative green product availability and price. The Carbon Neutral Gas Plan using carbon offsets was reaffirmed by Council in December 2020.

N7.7.2 Explore the transition of existing buildings from gas to electric or solar water and space heating.


S $$ O Through an RFP process, Utilities has selected a vendor to provide nonresidential electrification technical assistance service to help building owners electrify gas-fired energy systems in commercial buildings; staff will bring the contract to Council for approval in December 2021, with a program launch date in Q1 2022. Utilities will launch new electrification rebates for commercial customers in Q4 2021.On the residential side, staff issued an RFP for residential electrification services in June 2021 and expects to bring contracts to Council for approval in January 2022. New programs will provide technical assistance to assist residential customers with electrification projects, as well as direct install services for low income households. Staff also plans to launch new Heat pump space heating rebates to residential customers in Q1 2022.

N7.8.1 Evaluate energy efficient approaches for the treatment and reuse of organic waste that maximize resource recovery and reduce greenhouse gas generation at the RWQCP located in Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Landfill.


M $ O Reuse organic waste from the RWQCP; currently create Class A biosolids products and send a portion of the organics through an anaerobic digester to convert organics into a resource.

Goal N-8: Actively support regional efforts to reduce our contribution to climate change while adapting to the effects of climate change on land uses and city services.

Page 50 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 75


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


N8.1.1 Participate in cooperative planning with regional and local public agencies, including on the Sustainable Communities Strategy, on issues related to climate change, such as greenhouse gas reduction, water supply reliability, sea level rise, fire protection services, emergency medical services, and emergency response planning.

Office of Sustainability and Office of Emergency Services

R $ O Office of Sustainability in conjunction with Office of Emergency Services, reviewed the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan update and participated in regional working groups. Topic was discussed at the S/CAP Ad Hoc Committee meeting in January 2022

N8.1.2 Pursue or exceed State goals of achieving zero net carbon for residential buildings by 2020 and commercial buildings by 2030, without compromising the urban forest.

Office of Sustainability, City of Palo Alto Utilities Department and Planning and Development Services Department

S $ O Palo Alto's Energy Reach code, which advances an all-electric requirement for new residential construction, went into effect in 2020. Residential Building electrification was discussed at the September 2021 S/CAP Ad Hoc Committee meeting and at a November 2021 S/CAP Ad Hoc Workshop. Commercial Building Electrification was discussed at the October 2021 S/CAP Ad Hoc Committee meeting.

N8.2.1 Periodically update the S/CAP consistent with the update schedule in the approved S/CAP; this update shall include an updated greenhouse gas inventory and updated short, medium, and long-term emissions reduction goals.

Office of Sustainability

M $$ O Currently working on the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Update. Working with the S/CAP Ad Hoc Committee to finalize the S/CAP and the Three-Year work Plan.

N8.3.1 Protect the Municipal Services Center, Utility Control Center, and RWQCP from the impacts of sea level rise.


M $$$ O A sea level rise vulnerability assessment is underway and anticipate to be completed in 2022

N8.4.1 Prepare response strategies that address sea level rise, increased flooding, landslides, soil erosion, storm events and other events related to climate change. Include strategies to respond to the impacts of sea level rise on Palo Alto’s levee system.


S $$$ O Currently finalizing the Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment. Once that is complete, the Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan will be drafted.

Safety Element

Goal S-1: A safe community that is aware of risks and prepared for emergencies.

Page 51 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 76


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.1.1 Expand public education programs that help and encourage each household in the City to be prepared to be self-sufficient, with enough stored water and food to support the entire household for at least one week after a major earthquake, flood, terrorism event, COVID-19 pandemic or other major disaster.

Office of Emergency Services

S $ O (OES) continues to outreach to the community, per FEMA's whole community guidelines, and provided public safety education lectures, presentations, and trainings throughout the community. The OES Preparedness webpage also provides this information.

S1.1.2 Continue to implement and fund the Emergency Services Volunteer program.


S $ O Office of Emergency Services (OES) continues to manage the ESV program, there are currently over 700 registered volunteers. OES apportions funds annually to support this program including an annual community event, monthly training sessions, quarterly leader meetings, and two exercises per year.

S1.1.3 Conduct emergency hazard drills with key stakeholder organizations across the community to improve preparedness for known threats and hazards.


R $$ O Throughout the year, Office of Emergency Services (OES) conducts emergency drills with key stakeholders that include seminars, communications tests, table-top exercises, functional, and full scale exercises. We conducted three large scale emergency communications drills with our Emergency Services Volunteers in February, April, and November. We also host monthly radio drills with the City Department Operations Centers, and participated in monthly County radio drills. Additionally, OES has partnered with our ESV members to promote the Great California Shakeout - Oct 21, 2021 to raise awareness for earthquake preparedness.

S1.1.4 Support an annual community public safety fair to educate and engage the public on preparedness and offer the opportunity to buy emergency disaster supplies for home and vehicle.


R $$ O As COVID-19 risks have continued to linger in the community, we have not hosted such events.

Page 52 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 77


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.1.5 Encourage local businesses and other organizations to have disaster preparedness, communication, mitigation and recovery plans in place.


R $ O Business outreach has largely been narrowed to supporting COVID recovery, leveraging the Uplift Local outreach.

S1.2.1 Develop accessible, attractive marketing materials to promote involvement in community crime safety programs.


R $ C Office of Emergency Services (OES) has developed various marketing materials to promote preparedness and public safety. Annually, OES provides two utility flyers for earthquake awareness in April and floods/severe storms in October (in partnership with Public Works). In 2019, OES created multilingual preparedness products (available on our website). In 2020, OES participated in rollout of the new City Website.

S1.3.1 Explore the use of urban design principles to increase safety and prevent crime in Palo Alto.

Planning and Development Services & Office of Emergency Services

R $ O Office of Emergency Services (OES) maintains expertise and serves as a resource for Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) https://www.ncpc.org/resources/home-neighborhood-safety/crime-prevention-through-environmental-design-training-program/ and other safety and security best practices, in particular, for Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources (CIKR). OES is assisting City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) with site protection and resilience matters. OES is assisting Department of Public Works and Police Department with the Public Safety Building.

S1.3.2 Support programs such as the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Good Neighbor Next Door, which incentivizes home purchase for first responders with discounts.



Page 53 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 78


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.4.1 Make data available to maintain an accurate, up to date, and complete real-time local crime mapping function to promote neighborhood safety.

Police Department R $$ O Police Department's webpage contains regularly updated links to crime statistics.

S1.5.1 Promote neighborhood security by providing crime prevention information and training to residents, and continuing to fund resident involvement in neighborhood safety programs such as “Know Your Neighbor” grants and Block PreparednessCoordinators.

Police Department and Office of Emergency Services

R $ O OES has resumed BPC certification courses as part of our ESV program. In 2021 we held three BPC in person training courses. We also have an online method to become a BPC. BPC training also includes Neighborhood Watch.

S1.5.2 Collaborate with the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD), other school districts in the city, private schools, businesses, non-profits, and local faith-based organizations provide community safety education.

Police Department R $ P The School Resource Officer program was discontinued in July 2020 due to budget cuts from Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) and City. As-needed requests will be handled as staffing permits. The Police Explorer Program of youth cadets assisting with certain police assignments is still in effect.

S1.5.3 Encourage the PAUSD to develop secure school facilities and collaborate with Emergency Services Volunteers on disaster preparedness activities; emergency disaster planning, exercises and drills; and disaster recovery.


R $ O Office of Emergency Services meets routinely with the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) Safety and Security Manager and other key staff. In 2020 the City activated the Emergency Services Council / Citizen’s Corps Council to improve collaboration for the COVID-19 emergency, of which PAUSD was a routine member.

S1.5.4 Continue to support and encourage participation in Police Department programs to introduce youth to the importance and benefits of local law enforcement.

Police Department R $ P The School Resource Officer program was discontinued in July 2020 due to budget cuts from Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) and City. As-needed requests will be handled as staffing permits. The Police Explorer Program of youth cadets assisting with certain police assignments is still in effect.

Page 54 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 79


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.6.1 Enhance public safety department training for evolving challenges, such as small- to large-scale human threats, interacting with individuals with mental illness, and non-lethal alternatives.

Police Department R $ O Police Department is complying with state mandated training in multiple topics annually. The Department is working with County Mental Health and has staffed the PERT response team since December 2021.

S1.6.2 Support the PAPD in implementing and maintaining approved technologies for data gathering, surveillance, and recording interactions with the public. Incorporate best practices in use policies with special consideration in ensuring the programs protect the public’s privacy rights and civil liberties, in accordance with current legislation. Ensure transparency by communicating new equipment implementation, usage, privacy considerations, and retention of data.

Police Department R $$ O Refer to Council Surveillance Policy.

S1.6.3 Communicate transparently with the community regarding adoption of new PAPD equipment and/or tactics while balancing the need for operational security.

Police Department R $ O The Police Department will adhere to Council Surveillance policy when applicable and will consult with City staff and Council as directed with significant policy changes.

S1.7.1 Regularly monitor and review the level of public safety staffing and satellite police station locations required for efficient local service delivery.

Police Department R $ O The police substation at Stanford Shopping Center works in partnership with Simon Properties.

S1.7.2 Design the new Public Safety building to meet essential service standards, the needs of the public safety departments and be resilient against known threats and hazards.


S $$$ C Design of the Public Safety Building is complete and the construction started in spring 2021.

Page 55 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 80


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.7.3 Provide community notifications in the event of emergency using the best available methods and explore new technologies for emergency public information and warnings.


R $$ O OES remains proficient in the use of the Everbridge software system, that provides the AlertSCC mass notification functionality. OES also can provide notifications via Nextdoor, and in working with City communications managers - proliferate such messages on other social mediums. OES also keeps abreast of new technologies, such as ZoneHaven among others to recommend best use of these technologies.

S1.8.1 Update Palo Alto’s 2001 Terrorism Response Plan. Office of Emergency Services

S $$ C The plan was completed in 2019.

S1.9.1 Develop an Infrastructure Master Plan that projects the future needs of streets, underground utilities, and all City assets and plans for the incorporation of new technology that improves efficiency and effectiveness.


S $$$ O An Infrastructure Management System has been implemented to track operating and capital improvement costs and to maintain updates on deferred “catch-up” maintenance and planned “keep-up” maintenance for future improvements.

S1.10.1 Regularly update and make publicly available the City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan (EOP).


R $$$ PC The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is available on the City’s website; Office of Emergency Services is currently staffing an update to the EOP which will be available later in 2022.

Page 56 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 81


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.10.2 Participate in local and regional planning efforts to mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies.


R $ O OES continues to participate in regional planning efforts including the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), the Mutual Aid Regional Advisory Committee (MARAC), and Santa Clara County Operational Area Signatories Committee, and the Santa Clara County COVID-19 Community Working Group - among others. OES continues to lead the San Francisquito Creek Multi-Agency Coordination (SFC MAC) group as well as the Silicon Valley Homeland Security Coordination Group (SV-HSCG).

S1.10.3 Implement the mitigation strategies and guidelines provided by the LHMP, including those that address evolving hazards resulting from climate change.


R $$ O Annually, Office of Emergency Services updates the status of Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) projects. Currently, 38 projects are listed in the LHMP: 5 are complete, 17 are in progress, 12 are ongoing activities, 4 reported no action taken this year.

S1.12.1 Encourage multiagency coordination in case of incidents that cross disciplinary or jurisdictional boundaries or coordination that involves complex incident management scenarios.


R $ O OES leads the city's multi-agency coordination by integrating agencies into response efforts, as appropriate. This is done in keeping with the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the State of California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). This is done for both internal city departments, as well as for multi-jurisdictional incidents or events.

Page 57 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 82


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.12.2 Explore the establishment of mutually-beneficial cooperative agreements between Palo Alto’s police and fire departments and those of neighboring cities.

Police Department & Fire Department

M $ O Currently the departments share Communication System contracts with Mountain View and Los Altos Police Departments. Joint Records Management Systems was implemented in Dec 2021. CAD upgrade project under review.

S1.13.1 Identify solutions to add an additional power line to Palo Alto to ensure redundancy.


S $$ P The Utility's Department will retain a consultant to assist pursuit of PG&E solution through the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) transmission planning process.

S1.13.2 Explore incentives to adopt emerging, residential off- grid capabilities and technologies, including back-up power sources vital in the event of natural disasters or other threats.


M $ O The City of Palo Alto Utilities Department is facilitating customer adoption of technologies such as energy storage systems. The Utilities department has also completed an initial energy resiliency assessment of all-electric single-family residences.

Page 58 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 83


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.13.3 Continue citywide efforts to underground utility wires to limit injury, loss of life, and damage to property in the event of human-made or natural disasters.


R $$$ O To date, about 55% of City’s electric distribution lines are underground, either through the underground conversion program or having been placed underground when originally installed.

Further eight districts are identified for conversion, with a cost range of $20 to $24 million, which would bring the underground distribution line percentage up to about 60%.

Undergrounding has started in the Foothills rebuild for fire risk mitigation.

The City is evaluating a cost-share bundle package of services to residential neighborhoods which includes undergrounding, electrification and fiber-to-the-home.

S1.13.4 Enhance the safety of City-owned natural gas pipeline operations. Work with customers, public safety officials, and industry leaders to ensure the safe delivery of natural gas throughout the service area. Provide safety information to all residents on City-owned natural gas distribution pipelines.


R $$ O The City of Palo Alto Utilities Department maintains a robust gas safety program and annually provides gas safety information to residents.

Page 59 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 84


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S1.13.5 Provide off-grid and/or backup power sources for critical City facilities to ensure uninterrupted power during emergencies and disasters.

City of Palo Alto Utilities and Department of Public Works

R $$ O City of Palo Alto staff continue to explore the use of alternative forms of energy to offset the use of carbon based fuels. In designing the rebuild of Fire Station 4 (East Meadow), staff is evaluating a microgrid consisting of solar, energy storage and diesel generation. This project is planned for year 2024. The new public safety building has the capability of accommodating a energy storage system based microgrid at a future time. The solar generator trailer was acquired in 2020-21(via a grant) to provide back-up power for the mobile emergency operation center (MEOC) and other emergency vehicles.

The Sustainability and Climate Action Plan also has elements related to exploring the use of solar + energy storage and microgrids to lower the community's carbon footprint.

S2.5.1 Periodically review and update the City’s Seismic Hazard Ordinance. Planning and Development Services

IP $ P Project commencement is pending the availability of resources. Staff is exploring CalOES Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HGMP) opportunities.

S2.5.2 Continue to provide incentives for seismic retrofits of structures throughout the city, particularly those building types that would affect the most people in the event of an earthquake.


S $ P This effort is linked to measure S2.5.1. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

S2.6.1 Encourage efforts by individual neighborhood or block- level groups to pool resources for seismic retrofits.


M $ P This effort is linked to measure S2.5.1. Work has not yet commenced.

Goal S-2: Protection of life, ecosystems and property from natural hazards and disasters, including earthquake, landslide, flooding, and fire.

Page 60 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 85


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S2.6.2 Continue to use a seismic bonus and a TDR Ordinance for seismic retrofits for eligible structures in the Commercial Downtown (CD) zone.


R $ P This effort is linked to measure S2.5.1. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

S2.6.3 Evaluate the TDR Ordinance so that transferred development rights may be used for residential development on the receiver sites.



S2.6.4 Study the possibility of revising the transfer of development rights program to encourage seismic retrofits.



S2.6.5 Explore the use of Community Development Block Grants, Palo Alto Housing Funds and other sources of funding to support owners of lower income and senior housing to retrofit seismically-unsafe construction.


S $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.7.1 As part of the construction permitting process for proposed new and redeveloped buildings in areas of identified hazard shown on MapS-2, structures that would affect the most people in a seismic event require submittal to the City of a geotechnical/seismic report that identifies specific risks and appropriate mitigation measures.


S $ O The program is being implemented on applicable projects.

S2.7.2 Review and update, as appropriate, City code requirements for excavation, grading, filling and construction to ensure that they conform to currently accepted and adopted State standards.


M $ O The code requirements are currently up-to-date. Staff will continue to monitor accepted and adopted standards and update code as needed.

S2.7.3 Utilize the results of Palo Alto’s Seismic Hazards Identification Program and inventory of potentially seismically vulnerable building types to establish priorities and consider incentives to encourage structural retrofits.

Planning and Development Services and Building Services

S $ P No work was done on this project this year. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

S2.8.1 Implement flood mitigation requirements of FEMA in Special Flood Hazard Areas as illustrated on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps.


R $$$ O All private and public development projects within the Special Flood Hazard Areas are reviewed for compliance with FEMA regulations.

Page 61 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 86


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S2.8.2 Continue participating in FEMA’s Community Rating System to reduce flood insurance for local residents and businesses and strive to improve Palo Alto’s rating in order to lower the cost of flood insurance.


R $ O City of Palo Alto continues to participate in the Community Rating System and to evaluate opportunities to improve the rating.

S2.8.3 Collaborate with the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority and the Santa Clara Valley Water District on environmentally-sensitive efforts to stabilize, restore, maintain and provide one percent (100-year) flood protection adjacent to San Francisquito Creek.


IP $$$ O The Highway 101 to Bay project was completed in 2018. The Upstream of Highway 101 project is currently in the Design Development and Entitlements process.

S2.8.4 Work with East Palo Alto, Santa Clara Valley Water District and San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority on efforts to increase the flows within the San Francisquito Creek possible solutions include replacing the City-owned Newell Road Bridge and Francisquito Creek. District-owned Pope Chaucer Street Bridge.


S $$$ O Design work continues on the Newell Road Bridge project and the Upstream of Highway 101 project, which includes Pope Chaucer Street Bridge. Regulatory permitting is being coordinated for the two projects.

S2.10.1 Keep basement restrictions up to date with changing flood hazard zones.


S $ O This is an ongoing effort, including PW's effort to enforce an additional foot of height in flood prone areas to minimize insurance impacts.

S2.11.1 Review development standards applicable in areas susceptible to flooding from sea level rise, including east of Highway 101, West Bayshore and East Meadow Circle, the area east of San Antonio Road and north of East Charleston, and implement shoreline development regulations to ensure that new development is protected from potential impacts of flooding resulting from sea level rise and significant storm events. Regulations should be consistent with the Baylands Master Plan, as amended, and may include new shoreline setback requirements, limits on lot line adjustments to avoid the creation of vulnerable shoreline lots, and/or triggers for relocation or removal of existing structures based on changing site conditions and other factors.



Page 62 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 87


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S2.11.2 Study appropriate restrictions on underground construction in areas outside of flood zones, as shown on Map S-5, to accommodate expected higher groundwater levels due to sea level rise and minimize consequent flooding of underground construction.


S $ P Work has not yet commenced.

S2.12.1 Work cooperatively with the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority to provide flood protection from high tide events on San Francisco Bay, taking into account the impacts of future sea level rise, to provide one percent (100-year) flood protection from tidal flooding, while being sensitive to preserving and protecting the natural environment.


R $$$ O The City of Palo Alto continues to work with the project team to plan for projects such as tide gate replacement and Shoreline Study Phase 2 to improve Bay levees in anticipation of future sea level rise.

S2.12.2 Work with regional, State, and federal agencies to develop additional strategies to adapt to flood hazards to existing or new development and infrastructure, including support for environmentally sensitive levees.


R $ O A horizontal levee enhancement Feasibility Study is complete. The results will be combined with a Sea Level Rise Plan to determine courses of action.

S2.13.1 Regularly review and update the Fire Department’s operations, training facilities and programs to ensure consistency with current standards and Best Management Practices.

Fire Department R $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.13.2 Explore technological tools, such as cameras or remote sensors, to identify smoke or fires and initiate response as quickly as possible.

Fire Department S $$ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.14.1 Regularly review and fund updates to the Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan to ensure consistency with current standards and Best Management Practices.

Fire Department M $$ O Regular review and update is an ongoing effort.

S2.14.2 Implement the Foothills Fire Management Plan to balance conservation of natural resources with reduction of fire hazards especially in open space areas.

Fire Department R $$$ O The Foothills Fire Management Plan is implemented as required.

S2.14.3 Minimize fire hazards by maintaining low density zoning in wildland fire hazard areas.

Planning and Development Services Department

R $ O This is an ongoing effort

Page 63 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 88


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S2.14.4 Work collaboratively with other jurisdictions and agencies to reduce wildfire hazards in and around Palo Alto, with an emphasis on effective vegetation management and mutual aid agreements.


S2.14.5 Consider implementation of CAL FIRE recommended programs in educating and involving the local community to diminish potential loss caused by wildfire and identify prevention measures to reduce those risks.

Fire Department S $$ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.15.1 Evaluate measures for optimal service delivery to improve efficiency; develop automatic or mutual aid agreements with other jurisdictions, including Stanford, to improve efficiencies.

Fire Department M $$ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.15.2 Upgrade fire stations so that all remain fully functional following earthquakes.

Fire Department IP $$$ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.15.3 Periodically update the Fire Department Standards of Cover document.

Fire Department S $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S2.16.1 Provide public education on fire safety, including wildland and structural fire prevention, evacuation routes and guidelines for clearance of landscaping and other hazards around structures.


S3.1.1 Continue City permitting procedures for commercial and industrial storage, use, and handling of hazardous materials and regulate the commercial use of hazardous materials that may present a risk of off-site health or safety effects.

Fire Department IP $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S3.1.2 Minimize the risks of biohazards in Palo Alto, including Level 4 biohazards, by continuing to review and update, as necessary, local regulations regarding use, handling and disposal.

Fire Department S $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S3.1.3 Strengthen development review requirements and construction standards for projects on sites with groundwater contamination.


S $ O This requirement is ongoing as a part of CEQA review.

Goal S-3: An environment free of the damaging effects of human-caused threats and hazardous materials.

Page 64 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 89


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S3.1.4 Establish protocols to monitor the movement of hazardous materials on Palo Alto roadways and respond effectively to spills via established truck and construction routes.

Fire Department M $ O This is an ongoing effort.

S3.1.5 Work with non-profit organizations to provide information to the public regarding pesticides and other commonly used hazardous materials, environmentally preferable alternatives, and safe recycling and disposal practices to all user groups.


S3.1.6 Continue providing regular household hazardous waste collection events at the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant and strive to make these programs more convenient and accessible to residents.


R $ O Continue to promote the household hazardous waste collection events and Reuse Cabinets.

S3.1.7 Continue to allow small quantity generators to dispose of hazardous waste at cost.


R $ O Program continues to be available to small businesses.

S3.1.8 Continue to educate residents on the proper disposal of pharmaceutical and household hazardous waste. Encourage proper disposal of medications through pharmacies or drug take-back programs rather than flushing.


R $ O Advertising pharmaceutical disposal options and providing locations to residents is a continuous effort.

S3.6.1 Work with the freight industry to monitor the contents of freight trains intersecting Palo Alto for potentially hazardous materials, and to establish accountability for accidents and spills.


R $ P Work has not yet commenced; loss of staff positions impacts this effort.

S3.6.2 Work with Caltrain and the PAUSD, to educate students and the public on the dangers of rail trespass and the benefits of suicide support services available in Palo Alto.


R $ O Project Safety Net, now a 501(c)(3) and its partners continue to collaborate and educate the community. The City remains committed to participating and supporting Project Safety Net.

Page 65 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 90


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S3.8.1 Encourage residential and commercial food waste reduction through incentives, educational outreach and programs.


R $ O This work continues and is increasing as it is a key activity, to approach Zero Waste. Will expand ordinance requirements to improve diversion of organic waste.

S3.8.2 To the extent allowed by law, use refuse rate structures that incentivize waste reduction.


R $ O Will continue to review rates to ensure that this program charges the correct amount for the service.

S3.8.3 Continue to work with CalRecycle and the Department of Toxic Substances Control to develop and promote long-term solid waste management, such as environmentally responsible recycling programs, composting of food waste and other organics, and citywide electronics and digital hardware recycling efforts.


IP $ O This work continues and new campaigns are cycled through.

S3.9.1 Periodically review and update the adopted Construction and Debris program.


R $ O Monitoring the new requirement in this area that was adopted in July 2020.

S3.9.2 Educate Palo Alto residents and developers about available incentives to use environmentally friendly deconstruction activities to minimize our carbon footprint, and to save natural resources, as well as space in our landfills.



S3.10.1 Support efforts to enforce extended producer responsibility for solid waste to reduce waste produced from manufacturing, shipping, packaging and the entire life-cycle of the product.



S3.12.1 Complete an inventory of the City’s digital infrastructure to locate vulnerabilities and gaps in system redundancies and develop recommendations for improved cybersecurity.


S $$ C Completed for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System.The Utilities Department has an active program in place to identify vulnerabilities and continuously improve cybersecurity.

Page 66 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 91


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


S3.12.2 Establish criteria for the installation of high security telecommunications technology in new local government projects.


M $ P As part of the City's fiber backbone expansion project, Magellan Advisors collaborated with multiple departments (Community Services, Transportation, Public Works, Public Safety, Utilities) and identified locations where fiber is needed to enhance site security or provide new services.

S3.12.3 Establish a wi-fi network that will be available to public safety responders and Emergency Service Volunteers in the event of power interruption during an emergency or disaster.

City of Palo Alto Utilities and Office of Emergency Services

S $$ P As part of the City's fiber backbone expansion project, the City will deploy new wireless infrastructure to support mobile and portable communications for command and patrol vehicles, as well as incident command networks in the areas where existing commercial wireless services are often saturated due to a high concentration of public users (i.e. sporting event). The detailed engineering design is scheduled to be completed by March 31, 2022.

T1.2.1 Create a long-term education program to change the travel habits of residents, visitors, shoppers, and workers by informing them about transportation alternatives, incentives, and impacts. Work with the PAUSD and with other public and private interests, such as the Chamber of Commerce and Commuter Wallet partners, to develop and implement this program.


R $ P Will likely be part of Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) implementation if approved by Council.

T1.2.2 Advocate for improved connectivity to transit to serve workers who live in the South Bay and work in Palo Alto.


R $ PC This is an ongoing effort by city staff and council members appointed to various boards and commissions.

Transportation Element

Goal T-1: Create a sustainable transportation system, complemented by a mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling, use of public transportation, and other methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the use of single occupancy motor vehicles.

Page 67 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 92


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.2.3 Formalize TDM requirements by ordinance and require new developments above a certain size threshold to prepare and implement a TDM plan to meet specific performance standards. Require regular monitoring/reporting and provide for enforcement with meaningful penalties for non-compliance. The ordinance should also:Establish a list of effective TDM measures that include transit promotion, prepaid transit passes, commuter checks, car sharing, carpooling, parking cash-out, bicycle lockers and showers, shuttles to Caltrain, requiring TMA membership and education and outreach to support the use of these modes.Allow property owners to achieve reductions by contributing to citywide or employment district shuttles or other proven transportation programs that are not directly under the property owner’s control.Provide a system for incorporating alternative measures as new ideas for TDM are developed.Establish a mechanism to monitor the success of TDM measures and track the cumulative reduction of peak hour motor vehicle trips. TDM measuresshould at a minimum achieve the following: reduction in peak hour motor vehicle trips, with a focus on single-occupant vehicle trips. Reductions should be based on the rates included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation Manual for the appropriate land use category and size:•45 percent reduction in the Downtown district•35 percent reduction in the California Avenue area•30 percent reduction in the Stanford Research Park•30 percent reduction in the El Camino Real Corridor•20 percent reduction in other areas of the cityRequire new development projects to pay a Transportation Impact Fee for all those peak-hour motor vehicle trips that cannot be reduced via TDM measures. Fees collected would be used for capital improvements aimed at reducing vehicle trips and traffic congestion.Ensure a stable, sustained funding source to support implementation of TDM


S $ PC Partially implemented due to SB743 (Level of Service -to-Vehicle Miles Travel) implementation and TIF adoption. Due to lack of staff and funding resources, the TDM Ordinance element of task is delayed but could be funded via S/CAP if adopted.

T1.2.4 Evaluate the performance of pilot programs implemented by the Palo Alto Transportation Management Association and pursue expansion from Downtown to California Avenue and other areas of the city when appropriate.


IP $ O Quarterly reports and annual survey evaluate the Transportation Management Association (TMA) with Office of Transportation oversight. Council expanded use of City funds to include Cal Ave business district in 2020 following successful 2019 pilot program.

Page 68 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 93


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.2.5 Site City facilities near high-capacity transit and revise existing regulations, policies, and programs to encourage telecommuting, satellite office concepts, and work-at-home options.

Planning and Development Services, Office of Transportation & Human Resources Department

R $ P The online platform implementation is currently on-hold with resources allocated to address the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the City’s current employee performance appraisal process provides for City management to review and evaluate the quality of customer service in each department. In addition, the City Manager’s Office has launched a customer service feedback function to view the data collected and to monitor trends.

T1.2.6 Pursue full participation of Palo Alto employers in the TMA. Office of Transportation

R $$ O Where appropriate, Planning and Development Services includes Transportation Management Association (TMA) membership in development conditions. The TMA conducts ongoing outreach to employers, and the TMA's mode shift survey now doubles as an outreach tool.

T1.3.1 Develop an electric vehicle promotion program that identifies policy and technical issues, barriers and opportunities to the expansion of electric vehicles.


M $$ O This program is ongoing in conjunction with City of Palo Alto Utilities and Office of Transportation.

T1.3.2 Use low-emission vehicles for the Palo Alto Free Shuttle and work with transit providers, including SamTrans and VTA, to encourage the adoption of electric, fuel cell or other zero emission vehicles. Also work with private bus and shuttle providers, delivery companies, and ride services.


M $$$ P There are no plans to re-start the Palo Alto Shuttle. Staff are working to pilot a grant-funded two-year on-demand transit service, targeted to start prior to the 2023-24 school year. Vehicle type will be considered via the RFP process to select a vendor.

Page 69 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 94


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.4.1 Update the Zoning Code to ensure compatibility with the electric vehicle infrastructure requirements.


IP $ O During FY 20-21, Planning and Transportation Commission recommended and Council approved zoning code amendments to adjust parking regulations including supporting electric vehicles. Additional changes are in process.

T1.4.2 Periodically review requirements for electric and plug- in vehicle infrastructure in new construction. Consider and periodically review requirements for electric and plug-in infrastructure for remodels. Consider costs to the City, including identifying payment options.

Office of Sustainability and City of Palo Alto Utilities Department

R $ O This program is ongoing in conjunction with City of Palo Alto Utilities.

T1.6.1 Collaborate with transit providers, including Caltrain, bus operators and rideshare companies, to develop first/last mile connection strategies that boost the use of transit and shuttle service for local errands and commuting.


S $ P City received a VTA grant for a pilot on-demand transit project. Staff is working towards finalizing the agreement with VTA and will follow up with procurement of services.

T1.6.2 Continue to work with Caltrain, Amtrak, and public bus operators to expand bicycle storage on public transit vehicles and at transit hubs during both peak and off-peak hours.


IP $ O No updates to report at this time.

T1.11.1 Collaborate with Stanford University, VTA, Caltrain and other agencies to pursue improvements to the Palo Alto Transit Center area aimed at enhancing pedestrian experience and improving circulation and access for all modes, including direct access to El Camino Real for transit vehicles.


IP $$$ P Project is on hold for long term. In the long term, a Downtown Coordinated Area Plan is needed to address this program.

T1.11.2 In collaboration with Caltrain and Stanford Research Park, pursue expansion of service to the California Avenue Caltrain Station and creation of an enhanced transit center at the Station, including connections to VTA bus service, the Palo Alto Free Shuttle, the Marguerite, and other private shuttles serving the Research Park.


M $$$ O No updates to report at this time. In the long term, a California Ave Transit Center plan is needed to address this program.

Page 70 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 95


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.12.1 Strongly recommend that VTA maintain existing service and coverage levels in Palo Alto.


IP $ O Ongoing effort by Council members on VTA Committees and City staff. VTA's 2021 Transit Service Plan is paused due to public health orders limiting bus capacity to accommodate physical distancing.

T1.12.2 Work with VTA to expand VTA express bus service routes to serve the Stanford Research Park, California Avenue, Stanford University, and Downtown.


S $$ O VTA’s Express Bus Partnership Program was implemented in early 2020 and continues partnerships with companies in funding Express bus routes selected by the companies. The program runs annually, and Stanford Research Park continues to support Express Routes 101, 102, 103 and 104 through the end of 2021.

T1.12.3 Work with VTA to study the feasibility of, and if warranted provide, traffic signal prioritization for buses at Palo Alto intersections, focusing first on regional transit routes. Also, advocate for bus service improvements on El Camino Real such as queue jump lanes and curbside platforms.


S $$ O No updates to report at this time.

T1.13.1 Investigate a pilot program to subsidize a taxi, rideshare, or transit program for Palo Altans to get to/from downtown, including offering education and incentives to encourage users.


M $ O A trial program for downtown workers began in April 2016 via the Transportation Management Association (TMA). The TMA continues to subsidize ridesharing and transit for downtown service workers.

Page 71 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 96


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.14.1 Evaluate the shuttle system in collaboration with community members, people with special needs, and PAUSD to: § Evaluate current routes and ridership; Identify potential service improvements, including new or modified routes; expanded schedules that accommodate daytime, evening, and weekend demand; facilitating transit connections, and improvements to the safety and appearance of shuttle stops;Explore partnerships with other services that could complement and supplement the Palo Alto Shuttle;Develop clear and engaging materials to explain and promote shuttle use with the purpose of reducing barriers to use; andEstablish a schedule for regular evaluation and reporting to optimize shuttle system use and effectiveness.


IP $$$ O In the Spring of 2021, the City was awarded a $2 million Innovative Transit Grant by VTA to pilot a two-year on-demand transit service. Staff are working to initiate this service prior to the 2023-2024 school year.

T1.16.1 Continue regular surveys of bicycle use across the city, by collecting bicycle counts on important and potential bicycle corridors.


IP $$ O Ongoing as part of City of Palo Alto's Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) implementation.

T1.16.2 Consider marketing strategies such as a recurring Palo Alto Open Streets program of events, potentially in coordination with local business groups, which would include street closures and programming.

City Manager M $ O This is an ongoing effort. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T1.16.3 Encourage private schools to develop Walk and Roll Maps as part of Transportation Demand Management strategies to reduce vehicle trips.


IP $ O This is an ongoing effort, Gideon Hausner Jewish Day School developed their own map in 2014.

T1.16.4 Participate in local and regional encouragement events such as Palo Alto Walks and Rolls, Bike to Work Day, and Bike Palo Alto! that encourages a culture of bicycling and walking as alternatives to single occupant vehicle trips.


M $ O Coordination with City staff and various event sponsors are ongoing.

Page 72 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 97


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.19.1 Adjust the street evaluation criteria of the City's Pavement Management Program to ensure that areas of the road used by bicyclists are maintained at the same standards as, or at standards higher than, areas used by motor vehicles. Include bicycle and e-bike detection in intersection upgrades.


M $ O City-wide street surveys are completed biennially and include pavement inspections of bike lanes and bike boulevards. Installation of video detection equipment is included with street maintenance projects whenappropriate.

T1.19.2 Prioritize investments for enhanced pedestrian access and bicycle use within Palo Alto and to/from surrounding communities, including by incorporating improvements from related City plans, for example the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan and the Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, as amended, into the Capital Improvements Program.


IP $$$ O This program is ongoing. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T1.19.3 Increase the number of east-west pedestrian and bicycle crossings across Alma Street and the Caltrain corridor, particularly south of Oregon Expressway.


L $$$ O This program is ongoing. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T1.19.4 Encourage the use of bike sharing, and the provision of required infrastructure throughout Palo Alto, especially at transit stations and stops, job centers, community centers, and other destinations.


IP $ P Micro mobility pilot delayed due to public health orders preventing community engagement events required to launch new services.

T1.19.5 Improve amenities such as seating, lighting, bicycle parking, street trees, public art, and interpretive stations along bicycle and pedestrian paths and in City parks to encourage walking and cycling and enhance the feeling of safety.

Office of Transportation and Department of Public Works

IP $$$ O There are no substantial actions to report at this time. Ongoing as opportunities arise.

T1.22.1 Collect, analyze and report transportation data through surveys and other methods on a regular basis. Track progress on build-out of the 2012 Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan network.


R $$ O This program is ongoing. There are no updates to report at this time.

Page 73 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 98


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T1.25.1 As part of the effort to reduce traffic congestion, regularly evaluate the City’s current Transportation Impact Fee and modify as needed to implement transportation infrastructure improvements. Modifications to the impact fee program should be structured in keeping with the City’s desire to require new development to reduce peak hour motor vehicle contributions to the provision of transit services, shuttles, carpool/ rideshare incentives, and similar programs.


IP $ C Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) update was approved by City Council in 2019.

T1.26.1 In collaboration with regional agencies and neighboring jurisdictions, identify and pursue funding for rail corridor improvements and grade separation.


S $ O City is pursuing council review of the alternatives in consideration for the grade separation at Churchill, Meadow and Charleston Crossings. Currently, the council has narrowed the alternatives, however additional studies are needed to select the preferred alternative for each location.

T2.1.1 Implement computerized traffic management systems to improve traffic flow when feasible.


IP $$ O This program is ongoing. There are no updates to report at this time.

T2.1.2 Implement a program to monitor, coordinate, and optimize traffic signal timing a minimum of every two years along arterial and residential arterial streets.


IP $$ P This program will need additional staffing and funding resources to be implemented.

T2.2.1 Work in partnership with the Palo Alto TMA and Stanford University to aggregate data and realize measurable reductions in single-occupant vehicle commuting to and from Downtown and in the Stanford Research Park.


IP $ O This program is ongoing. There are no updates to report at this time.

Goal T-2: Decrease delay, congestion, and vehicle miles travelled with a priority on our worst intersections and our peak commute times, including school traffic.

Page 74 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 99


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T2.3.1 When adopting new CEQA significance thresholds for VMT for compliance with SB 743 (2013), adopt standards for vehicular LOS analysis for use in evaluating the consistency of a proposed project with the Comprehensive Plan, and also explore desired standards for MMLOS, which includes motor vehicle LOS, at signalized intersections.


S $$ P No updates to report at this time.

T2.4.1 Revise protocols for reviewing office, commercial, and multi-family residential development proposals to evaluate multimodal level of service and identify gaps in the low stress bicycle and pedestrian network.


S $ P Methodologies for Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) are neither standardized nor widely used. Level of stress analysis of the bicycle and pedestrian network is anticipated in the FY22 update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan. This analysis will inform development review by staff.

T3.5.1 Continue to use best practices in roadway design that are consistent with complete streets principles and the Urban Forest Master Plan, focusing on bicycle and pedestrian safety and multi-modal uses. Consider opportunities to incorporate best practices from the National Association of City Transportation Officials guidelines for urban streets and bikeways, tailored to the Palo Alto context.

Office of Transportation & Department of Public Works

S $$ O No additional updates to report.

T3.5.2 Establish procedures for considering the effects of street design on emergency vehicle response time.

Department of Public Works & Palo Alto Police Department & Palo Alto Fire Department

R $ O Input given when requested from the City. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T3.10.1 Support increased public transit, traffic management and parking solutions to ensure safe, convenient access to and from the Stanford Shopping Center/ Medical Center area.


R $ O This program is ongoing. The Quarry Road Extension is a potential project with regional transit benefits.

Goal T-3: Maintain an efficient roadway network for all users.

Page 75 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 100


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T3.10.2 Implement and monitor Development Agreement traffic mitigations at Stanford Medical Center.


IP $ O This program is ongoing lead by Planning Department with Office of Transportation support as needed.

T3.10.3 Provide safe, convenient pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections between the Stanford Shopping Center/Medical Center areas and housing along the Sand Hill Road/Quarry Road corridors to Palo Alto Transit Center, Downtown Palo Alto, and other primary destinations.


R $$$ P The Quarry Rd re-striping and path to Transit Center are recent projects. The Quarry Road Extension is a future project that will reduce transit travel time.

T3.10.4 Pursue extension of Quarry Road for transit, pedestrians and bicyclists to access the Palo Alto Transit Center from El Camino Real. Also study the feasibility of another pedestrian and bicycle underpass of Caltrain at Everett Street.


M $$ P This project is on hold.

T3.15.1 Undertake studies and outreach necessary to advance grade separation of Caltrain to become a “shovel ready” project and strongly advocate for adequate State, regional, and federal funding for design and construction of railroad grade separations.


S $$$ O The project is ongoing. City Council reviewed the details of grade separation alternatives at Meadow and Charleston on 8/23/21. Council plans to review Churchill Avenue Alternatives on 10/18/21. Staff will pursue additional studies and outreach. Future actions will depend upon Council Direction on the selection of Preferred Alternatives

T3.15.2 Conduct a study to evaluate the implications of grade separation on bicycle and pedestrian circulation.


S $$ P Will need additional funding to conduct this review. Staff needs to establish Capital Improvement Projects for such studies and design efforts.

T3.17.1 Complete a Palo Alto Avenue crossing study to identify potential near-term safety and accessibility improvements.


S $$ P This will be perfumed in conjunction with Downtown Area Study. This is currently on hold.

T3.17.2 Work with Caltrain to ensure that the rail tracks are safe and secure with adequate fencing and barriers.


S $$ O The project for safety improvements on Churchill Av. at-grade crossings is currently in progress.

Page 76 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 101


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T4.2.1 Periodically evaluate residential areas for traffic impacts and use the results of that evaluation to prioritize traffic calming measures.


IP $$ O Ongoing Program. Implemented traffic calming in Crescent Park Area

T4.4.1 Use landscaping and other improvements to establish clear “gateways” at the points where the Oregon Expressway, University Avenue and Embarcadero Road transition from freeways to neighborhoods.


L $$$ O This is an ongoing effort. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T5.1.1 Evaluate the need to update parking standards in the municipal code, based on local conditions, different users’ needs and baseline parking need. Allow the use of parking lifts for Office/R&D and multifamily housing as appropriate.

Planning and Development Services and Office of Transportation

S $ PC OOT presented initial recommendations to PTC in September 2021; for Finance Committee in October 2021, recommendations were focused on moving forward for adopting virtual permitting options. Additional recommendations will be presented along with the development of a commercial pilot process.

T5.1.2 Consider reducing parking requirements for retail and restaurant uses as a way to encourage new businesses and the use of alternative modes.


M $ P Work on this has not commenced yet, though the City has allowed use of parking spaces temporarily to enable parklets in the Right Of Ways and outdoor business on private parking lots. Council directed exploration of permanent parklets.

T5.1.3 Work with stakeholders in each commercial center and employment district to monitor conditions and determine the appropriate timing for revisions to parking requirements.



Goal T-4: Protect local streets that contribute to neighborhood character and provide a range of local transportation options.

Goal T-5: Encourage attractive, convenient, efficient and innovative parking solutions for all users.

Page 77 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 102


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T5.1.4 Study the feasibility of unbundled parking for office, commercial, and multi-family residential developments (including senior housing developments) that are well- served by transit and demonstrated walking and biking connections.


S $ P Work has not commenced.

T5.1.5 Consider reducing parking requirements for multifamily uses as a way to encourage new multi-family housing and the use of alternative modes, where reduction in parking would not impact the neighborhood.


S $ C Staff will continue exploration of permanent parklets and parking reductions for multi family residential use

T5.2.1 Use technology to help identify parking availability and make it easy to pay any parking fees.


S $$$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T5.2.2 Study and implement pricing strategies for public parking in commercial districts, taking into consideration both employee parking demand and the needs of retailers and customers. Use pricing to encourage short term parking on street, long term parking in parking garages, and the use of alternative modes of transportation


IP $$ O PTC reviewed options in an initial study session in May 2021. Additional stakeholder outreach to occur in 2022.

T5.2.3 Implement Council-adopted recommendations from the parking management study for the Downtown area, which address the feasibility of removing color- coded parking zones, and dynamic pricing and management policies to prioritize short-term parking spaces closest to the commercial core for customers, garage parking for employees, and neighborhood parking for residents.


S $$$ O Regular parking occupancy counts to occur with Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) implementation in 2022. Initial recommendations and additional engagement to occur as data is collected and reviewed.

T5.4.1 Explore incentives to encourage privately initiated shared parking among individual property owners when developments have excess parking that can be available for other businesses to use.


S $ P Work has not yet begun.

T5.8.1 Study the feasibility of retrofitting City-owned surface parking lots to implement best management practices for stormwater management and urban heat island mitigation, including green infrastructure, permeable pavement and reflective surfaces.


S $$ O Staff received a grant to retrofit an existing parking lot; scoping for project will commence in 2022.

Page 78 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 103


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T5.8.2 Identify incentives to encourage the retrofit of privately owned surface parking areas to incorporate best management practices for stormwater management and urban heat island mitigation as well as incentives for the provision of publicly accessible pavement and reflective surfaces.


S $ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T5.8.3 Update City requirements regarding trees and other landscaping that capture and filter stormwater within surface parking lots to take advantage of new technology.


R $ O This is an ongoing program. There are no substantial actions to report at this time.

T5.11.1 Coordinate with neighborhood groups and local businesses and other stakeholders to evaluate the need for a residential parking permit program in areas without existing programs.


S $$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T5.12.1 Work with employers, merchants, schools, and community service providers, to identify ways to provide more bicycle parking, including e-bike parking with charging stations, near existing shops, services and places of employment.


R $ O This is an ongoing program via 311 requests for parking in the public Right-of-Ways and through coordination with the Safe Routes to School program.

T5.12.2 Install secure electronic bike lockers such as the BikeLink system, at high theft locations, including transit stations and parking garages.



T5.12.3 Assess the need to provide additional bicycle parking in City-owned parking lots and rights-of-way.


M $$ O This is an ongoing program via 311 requests for parking in the public Right-of-Ways.

T6.1.1 Follow the principles of the safe routes to schools program to implement traffic safety measures that focus on Safe Routes to work, shopping, downtown, community services, parks, and schools, including all designated school commute corridors.



T6.1.2 Develop, distribute and aggressively promote maps and apps showing safe routes to work, shopping, community services, parks and schools within Palo Alto in collaboration with stakeholders, including PAUSD, major employers, TMAs, local businesses and community organizations.


IP $$ O This is an ongoing program. School Walk and Roll Maps are updated as needed. Walk and Roll to Libraries maps has been updated in 2018.

Goal T-6: Provide a safe environment for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists on Palo Alto streets.

Page 79 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 104


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T6.1.3 Address pedestrian safety along Alma Street between Embarcadero Road and Lytton Street.



T6.1.4 Address pedestrian safety on shared-use paths through the use of signs, pavement markings, and outreach to users, encouraging them to be safe and courteous.



T6.2.1 Regularly collect severity and location data on roadway collisions for all modes of travel, including fatalities and severe injuries, and use this data to make roadway design decisions. In collaboration with Santa Clara County, develop an up-to-date, public database for this information.


R $$ O This is an ongoing program via the County's collision database.

T6.4.1 Consider the Adopted School Commute Corridors Network and adopted “Walk and Roll” maps when reviewing development applications and making land use and transportation planning decisions. Incorporate these requirements into City code when feasible.



T6.4.2 Establish standards and procedures for maintaining safe bicycling routes, including signage for warnings and detours during construction projects.


IP $ C The Traffic Control Plan Guidelines was updated in 2016 and regularly reviewed.

T6.4.3 In collaboration with PAUSD, provide adult crossing guards at school crossings that meet established warrants.

Police Department R $$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T6.6.1 Periodically evaluate safety on roadways and at intersections and enhance conditions through the use of signal technology and physical changes. Consider the construction of traffic circles for improved intersection safety.


R $$$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T6.6.2 Continue to provide educational programs for children and adults, in partnership with community-based educational organizations, to promote the safe walking and safe use of bicycles, including the City-sponsored bicycle education programs in the public schools and the bicycle traffic school program for juveniles.



T6.6.3 Work with PAUSD and employers to promote roadway safety for all users, including motorized alternatives to cars and bikes such as mopeds and e-bikes, through educational programs for children and adults.



Page 80 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 105


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T6.6.4 Complete a mobility and safety study for downtown Palo Alto, looking at ways to improve circulation and safety for all modes.



T6.6.5 Identify and construct safety improvements for pedestrian underpasses, including on Embarcadero Road.


L $$$ P Work has not commenced.

T6.6.6 Improve pedestrian crossings by creating protected areas and better pedestrian and traffic visibility. Use a toolbox including bulb outs, small curb radii, high visibility crosswalks, and landscaping.


R $$$ O This is an ongoing program, no updates to report at this time.

T6.6.7 Establish a program to educate residents to keep sidewalks clear of parked cars, especially on narrow local streets in neighborhoods with rolled curbs. Survey for compliance annually.


M $$ P Work has not commenced. A rolled curb parking flyer is available on the City website.

T6.7.1 Evaluate the performance of safety improvements and identify methods to encourage alternative transportation modes.



T7.1.1 Expand transportation opportunities for transit- dependent riders by supporting discounts for taxi fares, rideshare services, and transit, by coordinating transit systems to be shared by multiple senior housing developments, and by maintaining a database of volunteer drivers, and other transit options.


M $$ P Work has not commenced. The on-demand transit pilot will include discount fares for seniors and possibly others.

T7.1.2 Coordinate with social service agencies and transit agencies to fill gaps in existing transportation routes and services accessible to transit-dependent riders no matter their means and design new bus routes that enable them to access those services.


R $$$ O Due to the pandemic, free shuttle service was cancelled. The future on-demand transit service will include fare discounts.

T7.1.3 Pursue expanded evening and night time bus service to enhance mobility for all users during off-peak times.


R $ P This program is unlikely to be pursued with VTA's 2021 New Service Plan.

Goal T-7: Provide mobility options that allow people who are transit dependent to reach their destinations.

Goal T-8: Influence the shape and implementation of regional transportation policies and technologies to reduce traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

Page 81 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 106


2021 Status




Routine

$=Small, $$=Medium



Pending

Program TextLead


T8.1.1 Continue to participate in regional efforts to develop technological solutions that make alternatives to the automobile more convenient.


R $ O Projects like Dumbarton Forward a MTC/AC Transit Travel Time improvement Project, PASS Project, and Manager’s Mobility Partnership address this.

T8.3.1 Advocate for provision of a new southbound entrance ramp to Highway 101 from San Antonio Road, in conjunction with the closure of the southbound Charleston Road on-ramp at the Rengstorff Avenue interchange in Mountain View.


S $ O At present VTA is leading work effort to identify project alternatives, define scope of upcoming analysis, and apply for grant funding.

T8.7.1 Work with regional transportation providers to improve connections between Palo Alto and the San Francisco International Airport and Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport.



T8.8.1 Identify and improve bicycle connections to/from neighboring communities in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties to support local trips that cross city boundaries. Also advocate for reducing barriers to bicycling and walking at freeway interchanges, expressway intersections, and railroad grad crossings.


IP $$$ O This is an ongoing project. Peninsula Bikeway signage was installed in 2018 via efforts of the Managers Mobility Partnership, which continues to improve connections between local jurisdictions. Adobe Creek Bridge will be completed in Autumn of 2021. Newell Bridge project has expected completion date in 2023. Class 1 or Class 4 bicycle facilities will be included in the reconstruction of the 101/San Antonio interchange.


Page 82 of 82

4.a

Packet Pg. 107

TABLE B Program Implementation Status

Housing Element Program Status Page 1 of 27 Revised December 2021

Status of Housing Element Programs 2015-2023

December 2021

Goal/Policy/Program Description Plan Objective Funding Source Responsible Agency

Time Frame Status

H1 Goal ENSURE THE PRESERVATION OF THE UNIQUE CHARACTER OF RESIDENTIAL

NEIGHBORHOODS H1.1 Policy Promote the rehabilitation of

deteriorating or substandard

residential properties using

sustainable and energy

conserving approaches.

H1.1.1 Program

Continue the citywide

property maintenance,

inspection, and

enforcement program.

Continue to

provide services

which promote

rehabilitation of

substandard

housing.

City Funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department;

Code Enforcement

Ongoing Ongoing Program.

H1.1.2 Program

Consider modifying

development standards for

second units, where

consistent with maintaining

the character of existing

neighborhoods. The

modifications should

encourage the production of

second units affordable to

very low-, low-, or moderate-

income households.

Consider

modifying the

Zoning Code to

provide for

additional second

units.

General Fund Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Conduct a study

within three

years of adoption

of Housing

Element to

assess the

potential for

additional

second units with

modifications to

the development

standards.

Complete. The new Ordinance was adopted November 2020. Staff will return to PTC regarding establishing rules for Affordable units.

H1.1.3 Program

Provide incentives to developers

such as reduced fees and

flexible development standards

Preserve 10

rental cottages

and duplexes.

City Housing funds Planning and

Development

Services

Explore

incentives within

three years of

Partially Complete.

ADU regulations were

approved in

4.b

Packet Pg. 108




Time Frame Status

to encourage the preservation

of existing rental cottages and

duplexes currently located in the

R-1 and R-2 residential areas.

Department Housing Element

adoption.

November 2020.

H1.2 Policy Support efforts to preserve multifamily housing units in existing neighborhoods.

H1.2.1 Program

When a loss of rental housing

occurs due to subdivision or

condominium conversion

approvals, the project shall

require 25 percent BMR units.

Provide 10

additional

affordable

housing units on

sites where rental

housing will be

lost.

NA Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Partially Complete.

There have not been

any projects subject to

this program to date.

H1.3 Policy Encourage community

involvement in the

maintenance and enhancement

of public and private properties

and adjacent rights-of-way in

residential neighborhoods.

H1.3.1 Program

Create community volunteer

days and park cleanups,

plantings, or similar events that

promote neighborhood

enhancement and conduct

City- sponsored cleanup

campaigns for public and

private properties.

Coordin. with the

City’s waste and

disposal hauler

to conduct a

cleanup

campaign once a

year to promote

neighborhood

clean-up.

City Housing Funds

Public Works

Department


H1.4 Policy Ensure that new developments

provide appropriate transitions

from higher density

4.b

Packet Pg. 109




Time Frame Status

development to single-family

and low-density residential

districts to preserve

neighborhood character.

H2 Goal SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSING NEAR SCHOOLS, TRANSIT, PARKS, SHOPPING, EMPLOYMENT, AND CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS

H2.1 Policy Identify and implement

strategies to increase housing

density and diversity, including

mixed-use development and a

range of unit styles, near

community services. Emphasize

and encourage the

development of affordable and

mixed-income housing to

support the City’s fair share of

the regional housing needs and

to ensure that the City’s

population remains

economically diverse.

H2.1.1 Program

To allow for higher density

residential development, consider

amending the Zoning Code to

permit high-density residential in

mixed use or single use projects in

commercial areas within one-half

a mile of fixed rail stations and to

allow limited exceptions to the 50-

foot height limit for Housing

Element Sites within one-quarter

mile of fixed rail stations.

Provide

opportunities

for a diverse

range of

housing types

near fixed rail

stations.


Development

Services

Department

Consider Zoning

Code

amendments

within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Complete.

Part of the Phase 1

Housing Element

implementation plan

for 2018. Completion

in Feb. 2019

H2.1.2 Program

.

Allow increased residential

densities and mixed-use

development only where

adequate urban services and

amenities, including roadway

Make sure that

adequate

services are

available when

considering


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Complete.

Council did expand

additional area of the

Housing

Improvement

4.b

Packet Pg. 110




Time Frame Status

capacity, are available. increased

residential

densities.

Program Area in

2020.

H2.1.3 Program

Amend the zoning code to

specify the minimum density of

eight dwelling units per acre in all

RM-15 districts. Consider

amending the zoning code to

specify minimum density for

other multifamily zoning

districts, consistent with the

multi-family land use

designation in the

Comprehensive Plan.

To provide

opportunities

for up to10

additional

dwelling units

on properties

zoned RM-15


Development

Services

Department

Within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Complete.

Adopted Housing

Incentive Ordinance

in 2019.

H2.1.4 Program

.

Amend the Zoning Code to

create zoning incentives that

encourage the development of

smaller, more affordable

housing units, including units for

seniors, such as reduced parking

requirements for units less than

900 square feet and other

flexible development standards.

Provide

opportunities

for 75 smaller,

more

affordable

housing units.


Development

Services

Department

Within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Partially Complete. The new ADU Ordinance was adopted November 2020. Staff to return to PTC regarding establishing rules for Affordable units.

H2.1.5 Program

Use sustainable neighborhood

development criteria to

enhance connectivity,

walkability, and access to

amenities, and to support

housing diversity.

Increase

connectivity

and walkability

in new

development.

VTA and City Funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Partially Complete.

North Ventura

Community Action

Plan underway.

H2.1.6 Program

Consider density bonuses

and/or concessions including

allowing greater concessions

for 100% affordable housing

developments.

Provide

opportunities

for 100%

affordable

housing


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Complete.

4.b

Packet Pg. 111




Time Frame Status

developments.

H2.1.7 Program

Explore developing a Transfer

of Development Rights (TDR)

program to encourage higher-

density housing in appropriate

locations.

Create

opportunities

for higher-

density

housing.


Development

Services

Department

Consider

program within

two years of

Housing Element

adoption.

Partially Complete.

Completed part of

the Phase 1 Housing

Element

implementation plan

for 2018, standards to

be developed.

H2.1.8 Program

Promote redevelopment of

underutilized sites by providing

information about potential

housing sites on the City’s

website, including the Housing

Sites identified to meet the

RHNA and information about

financial resources available

through City housing programs.

Provide

information to

developers

about

potential

housing sites.

City funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Post information

on website upon

adoption of

Housing

Element.

Complete.

4.b

Packet Pg. 112




Time Frame Status

H2.1.9 Program


create zoning incentives that

encourage the consolidation of

smaller lots identified as

Housing Inventory Sites and

developed with 100%

affordable housing projects.

Incentives may include

development review

streamlining, reduction in

required parking for smaller

units, or graduated density

when consolidated lots are over

one-half acre. Adopt

amendments as appropriate.

Provide information regarding

zoning incentives to developers.

Amend the

Zoning Code to

provide

development

incentives to

meet the

RHNA.

City funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Adopt

amendments

within two years

of Housing

Element

adoption.

Complete.

H2.1.10 Program

As a part of planning for the

future of El Camino Real, explore

the identification of pedestrian

nodes (i.e. “pearls on a string”)

consistent with the South El

Camino Design Guidelines, with

greater densities in these nodes

than in other areas.

Explore the

identification of

pedestrian

nodes.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing in

conjunction with

the

Comprehensive

Plan update.

Partially Complete.

Part of the Phase 1

Housing Element

implementation plan;

in 2018. Comp. Plan

adopted.

H2.1.11 Program

Consider implementing the

Pedestrian and Transit Oriented

Development (PTOD) Overlay for

the University Avenue

downtown district to promote

Consider PTOD

for University

Avenue.


Development

Services

Department

Within four years

of Housing

Element

adoption, in

conjunction with

Not Yet Complete. The City is exploring other options to PTOD.

4.b

Packet Pg. 113




Time Frame Status

higher density multifamily

housing development in that

area.

the

Comprehensive

Plan update.

H2.1.12 Program

Evaluate developing specific or

precise plans for the downtown,

California Avenue, and El Camino

Real areas to implement in the

updated Comprehensive Plan.

Adopt plans for these areas, as

appropriate.

Evaluate

developing plans

for downtown,

California

Avenue, and El

Camino Real.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing in

conjunction with

the

Comprehensive

Plan update

Complete.

Comprehensive Plan

adopted the study of

Coordinated Plans for

Cal Ave and

Downtown.

H2.2 Policy

Continue to support

redevelopment of suitable lands

for mixed uses containing

housing to encourage compact,

infill development. Optimize the

use of existing urban services

and support transit.

•

.

H2.2.1 Program

Implement an incentive program

within three years of Housing

Element adoption for small

properties identified as a

Housing Element Site to

encourage housing production

on those sites. The incentive

eliminates Site and Design

Review if the project meets the

following criteria:

• The project has 9 residential

units or fewer

• A residential density of 20

dwelling units per acre or higher

Streamline

processing for

identified

Housing Element

Sites


Development

Services

Department

Adopt program

within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption

Complete.

4.b

Packet Pg. 114




Time Frame Status

Maximum unit size of 900 square

feet

H2.2.2 Program

Work with Stanford University to

identify sites suitable for housing

that may be located in the

Stanford Research Park and

compatible with surrounding uses.

Identify sites

suitable for

housing to

accommodate

additional

housing units.


Development

Services

Department

Identify sites

within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Not Yet Complete.

H2.2.3 Program

Use coordinated area plans

and other tools to develop

regulations that support the

development of housing above

and among commercial uses.

Explore

additional

opportunities to

encourage

housing in

commercial

areas.

VTA and City Funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Partially Complete:

Underway. Part of the

Phase 1 Housing

Element

implementation plan

for 2018;

development of the

North Ventura

Coordinated Area

Plan in progress.

H2.2.4 Program

As detailed in the Resources

chapter of the Housing Element,

the City of Palo Alto has

committed to providing financial

assistance towards the

conversion of 23 multi-family

units to very low-income (30-

50% AMI) units for a period of 55

years, and is seeking to apply

credits towards the City’s RHNA

(refer to Appendix C - Adequate

Sites Program Alternative

Checklist). The Palo Alto Housing

Corporation (PAHC) approached

the City for assistance in

By the end of the

second year of

the housing

element planning

period, the City

will enter into a

legally

enforceable

agreement for

$200,000 in

committed

assistance to

purchase

affordability

covenants on 23


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Complete.

January 2016.

4.b

Packet Pg. 115




Time Frame Status

converting a portion of the 60

units at the Colorado Park

Apartments, to be reserved for

very low-income households.

The committed assistance will

ensure affordability of the units

for at least 55 years, as required

by law.

units at the

Colorado Park

Apartments. The

City will report to

HCD on the

status of

purchasing

affordability

covenants no

later than July 1,

2018, and to the

extent an

agreement is not

in place, will

amend the

Housing Element

as necessary to

identify

additional sites.

H2.2.5 Program

The City will continue to

identify more transit-rich

housing sites including in the

downtown and the California

Avenue area after HCD

certification as part of the

Comprehensive Plan Update

process and consider

exchanging sites along San

Antonio and sites along South

El Camino that are outside of

identified “pedestrian nodes” for the more transit-rich identified sites.

Explore

additional

appropriate

housing sites.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Not Yet complete. Amended to include additional housing in San Antonio corridor in November 2019.

H2.2.6 Program

On parcels zoned for mixed use,

consider allowing exclusively

Consider transfer

of zoning


Development

Within three

years of Housing

Complete.

Part of Housing

4.b

Packet Pg. 116




Time Frame Status

residential use on extremely

small parcels through the

transfer of zoning requirements

between adjacent parcels to

create horizontal mixed-use

arrangements. If determined to

be appropriate, adopt an

ordinance to implement this

program.

requirements to

create horizontal

mixed use.

Services

Department

Element

adoption

Program 2.1.9 above.

H2.2.7 Program

Explore requiring minimum

residential densities to

encourage more housing instead

of office space when mixed-use

sites develop and adopt

standards as appropriate.

Explore requiring

minimum

densities in

mixed use

districts.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing in

conjunction with

the

Comprehensive

Plan update

Complete.

Adoption new

development

standards

CS18.16.060.

H2.2.8 Program

Assess the potential of removing

maximum residential densities

(i.e. dwelling units per acre) in

mixed use zoning districts to

encourage the creation of

smaller housing units within the

allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

and adopt standards as

appropriate.

Assess removal

of maximum

densities in

mixed use zoning

districts.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing in

conjunction with

the

Comprehensive

Plan update

Complete.

Feb. 2019.

H2.3 Policy Heighten community awareness

and to receive community input

regarding the social, economic

and environmental values of

maintaining economic diversity

in the City by providing

affordable and mixed income

higher density housing along

transit corridors and at other

appropriate locations.

4.b

Packet Pg. 117




Time Frame Status

H2.3.1 Program

Maintain an ongoing

conversation with the

community, using a variety of

forms of media, regarding the

need for affordable housing, the

financial realities of acquiring

land and building affordable

housing, and the reasons that

affordable housing projects

need higher densities to be

feasible developments.

Perform

outreach on

affordable

housing.


Development

Services

Department


H3 Goal MEET UNDERSERVED HOUSING NEEDS, AND PROVIDE COMMUNITY RESOURCES TO SUPPORT OUR

NEIGHBORHOODS

H3.1 Policy Encourage, foster, and preserve

diverse housing opportunities

for very low-, low-, and

moderate income households.

H3.1.1 Program

Amend the City’s BMR ordinance

to lower the BMR requirement

threshold from projects of five or

more units to three or more

units, and to modify the BMR

rental section to be consistent

with case law related to

inclusionary rental housing.

Provide

opportunities for

four additional

BMR units.


Development

Services

Department

Amend BMR

Ordinance within

three years of

Housing Element

adoption.

Complete.

Ordinance adopted

on April 17, 2017.

H3.1.2 Program

Implement the BMR ordinance to reflect the City’s policy of requiring:

a) At least 15 percent of all

housing units in projects must

be provided at below market

Provide 10

affordable units

through

implementation

of the City’s BMR

program.

Developers Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing –

implementation

of existing

program

Ongoing Program.

4.b

Packet Pg. 118




Time Frame Status

rates to very low-, low-, and

moderate-income households.

Projects on sites of five acres or

larger must set aside 20 percent

of all units as BMR units.

Projects that cause the loss of

existing rental housing may

need to provide a 25 percent

component as detailed in

Program H 1.2.1. BMR units

must be comparable in quality,

size, and mix to the other units

in the development.

b) Initial sales price for at

least two- thirds of the BMR

units must be affordable to a

household making 80 to 100

percent of the Santa Clara

County median income. The

initial sales prices of the

remaining BMR units may be set

at higher levels affordable to

households earning between

100 to

120 percent of the County’s

median income. For projects

with a 25 percent BMR

component, four-fifths of the

BMR

units must be affordable to

households

H3.1.3 Program

Continue implementation of the

Below Market Rate Program

Emergency Fund to prevent the

Use the BMR

Program

Emergency Fund

BMR Emergency Fund

Planning and

Development

Services

On Ongoing Program

preserved one BMR

unit in 2016; CDBG

4.b

Packet Pg. 119




Time Frame Status

loss of BMR units and to provide

emergency loans for BMR unit

owners to maintain and

rehabilitate their units. Consider

expansion of program funds to

provide financial assistance for

the maintenance and

rehabilitation of older BMR

units.

to prevent the

loss of at least

two affordable

units and assist in

maintenance and

rehabilitation of

at least four older

BMR units

Department funding for Safe and

Sanitary maintenance

of 5 units inFY2018-19.

H3.1.4 Program

Preserve affordable housing

stock by monitoring compliance,

providing tenant education, and

seeking other sources of funds

for affordable housing

developments at risk of market

rate conversions. The City will

continue to renew existing

funding sources supporting

rehabilitation and maintenance

activities.

Prevent

conversion of

affordable

housing to market

rate and renew

funding sources

for rehabilitation

and maintenance

of housing stock.

City, CDBG funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing.

Continued

implementation

of existing

program

Partially Complete.

Underway, in

discussions with

property owners of

projects at risk of

conversion, including

Lytton Gardens,

Terman Apartments

and Webster Wood

Apartments.

H3.1.5 Program

Encourage the use of flexible

development standards,

including floor- area ratio limits,

creative architectural solutions,

and green building practices in

the design of projects with a

substantial BMR component.

Increase

opportunities for

BMR

development

through use of

flexible

development

standards.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing.

Continued

implementation

of existing

program

Ongoing Program.

The Planned Housing

Zone was adopted in

Sept. 2020 with more

affordable housing

options to provide

greater flexibility.

H3.1.6 Program

Require developers of

employment- generating

commercial and industrial

developments to contribute to

the supply of low- and

Generate in-lieu

fees to contribute

toward the

creation of low-

and moderate-

City Housing Fund Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing.

Continue to

regularly update

the commercial

in-lieu fee.

Complete.

The commercial in-

lieu fee housing

development fee is

regularly updated

4.b

Packet Pg. 120




Time Frame Status

moderate-income housing

through the payment of

commercial in-lieu fees as set

forth in a nexus impact fee study

and implementing ordinances.

income housing. with other city fees

based on nexus

impact fee studies.

H3.1.7 Program

Ensure that the Zoning Code

permits innovative housing

types such as co- housing and

provides flexible development

standards that will allow such

housing to be built, provided the

character of the neighborhoods

in which such housing is

proposed to be located is

maintained.

Review the

Zoning Code and

determine

appropriate

amendments to

allow innovative

housing types

with flexible

development

standards.


Development

Services

Department

Consider

changes to the

Zoning Code

within four years

of Housing

Element

adoption.

Not Complete.

Included in Housing

Work Plan as

Program 2.8.

H3.1.8 Program

Recognize the Buena Vista

Mobile Home Park as providing

low- and moderate income

housing opportunities. Any

redevelopment of the site must

be consistent with the City’s

Mobile Home Park Conversion

Ordinance adopted to preserve

the existing units. To the extent

feasible, the City will seek

appropriate local, state and

federal funding to assist in the

preservation and maintenance

of the existing units in the Buena

Vista Mobile Home Park.

Preserve the 120

mobile home

units in the

Buena Vista

Mobile Home

Park as a low and

moderate

income housing

resource.

City, State and Federal Funds

Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Complete.

Mobile home park

was preserved in

September 2017 with

interagency

cooperation.

H3.1.9 Program

Continue enforcing the

Condominium Conversion

Ordinance.

Maintain the

rental housing

stock.


Development

Services

Department


4.b

Packet Pg. 121




Time Frame Status

H3.1.10 Program

Annually monitor the progress

in the construction or

conversion of housing for all

income levels, including the

effectiveness of housing

production in mixed use

developments.

Provide

information to

the City Council

on the

effectiveness of

City programs.


Development

Services

Department

Provide annual reports.

Ongoing Program.

H3.1.11 Program

When using Housing

Development funds for

residential projects, the City

shall give a strong preference to

those developments which

serve extremely low-income

(ELI), very low-income, and low-

income households.

Provide funding

opportunities for

development of

housing for

Extremely Low

Income

households.

City Housing

Development funds

Planning and

Development

Services

Department


Housing funds

provided as needed

by housing projects.

H3.1.12 Program


provide additional incentives to

developers who provide

extremely low-income (ELI),

very low-income, and low-

income housing units, above

and beyond what is required by

the Below Market Rate

program, such as reduced

parking requirements for

smaller units, reduced

landscaping requirements, and

reduced fees.

Provide

incentives for

development of

housing for

Extremely Low

Income

households.


Development

Services

Department

Within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Complete.

Part of the Phase 1

Housing Element

implementation plan

for 2018. In, 2019

new

development/parking

standards were

adopted in Housing

Incentive Program,

CS18.16.060

4.b

Packet Pg. 122




Time Frame Status

H3.1.13 Program

For any affordable

development deemed a high

risk to convert to market rate

prices within two years of the

expiration of the affordability

requirements, the City will

contact the owner and explore

the possibility of extending the

affordability of the

development.

To protect those

affordable

developments

deemed a high

risk to converting

to market rate


Development

Services

Department


Underway, in

discussions with

property owners of

projects at risk of

conversion, including

Lytton Gardens,

Terman Apartments

and Webster Wood

Apartments.

H3.1.14 Program

Encourage and support the

regional establishment of a

coordinated effort to provide

shared housing arrangement

facilitation, similar to the HIP

Housing Home Sharing Program

in San Mateo County. Advocate

among regional and nonprofit

groups to establish the

necessary framework.

Meet with

regional groups

and work to

establish a Santa

Clara Home

Sharing Program


Development

Services

Department

Within two years

of Housing

Element

adoption.

Partially Complete.

Underway. On April

2018, the Santa Clara

County's Board

approved the Santa

Clara Home Sharing

Program with

partnership with

Catholic Charities of

Santa Clara County.

H3.2 Policy Reduce the cost of housing by

continuing to promote energy

efficiency, resource management,

and conservation for new and existing housing.

H3.2.1 Program

Continue to assist very low-

income households in reducing

their utility bills through the

Utilities Residential Rate

Assistance Program (RAP).

Provide assistance

to with utility bills

to 800 low-

income

households.

City Funds Palo Alto

Utilities

Department


H3.2.2 Program

Use existing agency programs

such as Senior Home Repair to

Provide

rehabilitation

assistance to 600

CDBG and General

Fund

Planning and

Development

Services


CDBG funds were

4.b

Packet Pg. 123




Time Frame Status

provide rehabilitation

assistance to very low- and

low-income households.

very low and low-

income

households.

Department allocated for a pilot

home repair program

in FY18.

H3.3 Policy Support the reduction of

governmental and regulatory

constraints, and advocate for

the production of affordable

housing.

H3.3.1 Program

When appropriate and feasible,

require all City departments to

expedite processes and allow

waivers of development fees as

a means of promoting the

development of affordable

housing.

Continue to

reduce

processing time

and costs for

affordable

housing

projects.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Ongoing Program. Work continues on objective zoning standards.

H3.3.2 Program

Continue to exempt

permanently affordable

housing units from any

infrastructure impact fees

adopted by the City.

Reduce costs

for affordable

housing

projects.


Development

Services

Department


H3.3.3 Program

Promote legislative changes and

funding for programs that

subsidize the acquisition,

rehabilitation, and operation of

rental housing by housing

assistance organizations,

nonprofit developers, and for-

profit developers.

Continue as an

active member of

the Non- Profit

Housing

Association of

Northern

California to

promote

legislative changes and funding


Development

Services

Department;

City Manager


Active membership

in the Non- Profit

Housing Association.

H3.3.4 Program

Support the development and

preservation of group homes

and supported living facilities for

persons with special housing

Regularly review

existing

development

regulations and

City & CDBG Funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Amend Zoning

Code within

three years of

Housing Element

Ongoing Program.

As Housing Plan Work Program 2.4.7.

4.b

Packet Pg. 124




Time Frame Status

needs by assisting local agencies

and nonprofit organizations in

the construction or

rehabilitation of new facilities

for this population.

amend the

Zoning Code

accordingly to

reduce

regulatory

obstacles to this

type of housing.

adoption.

H3.3.5 Program

Review and consider revising


second units to facilitate the

development of this type of

housing, including reduced

minimum lot size and FAR

requirements. Based on this

analysis, consider modifications

to the Zoning Code to better

encourage development of

second units.

Complete study

on impact of

revised

standards, and

consider Zoning

Code

Amendments


Development

Services

Department,

City Council

Ongoing Complete.

New Ordinance

adopted November

2020. Staff to return to

PTC regarding

establishing rules for

Affordable units.

H3.3.6 Program

Continue to participate

with and support agencies

addressing homelessness.

Continue City

staff

participation in

prioritizing

funding for

County-wide

programs.

City, CDBG & HOME

funds

Planning and

Development

Services

Department,

City Council


H3.3.7 Program

Prepare a local parking

demand database to

determine parking standards

for different housing uses (i.e.

market rate multifamily,

multifamily affordable, senior

affordable, emergency

Determine

parking

standards for

different

residential uses.


Development

Services

Department

Within four

years of

Housing

Element

adoption.

Not Yet Complete.

Underway,

consultant has been

retained to complete

a parking study.

4.b

Packet Pg. 125




Time Frame Status

shelters etc.) with proximity

to services as a consideration.

Adopt revisions to standards

as appropriate.

H3.4 Policy Pursue funding for the

acquisition, construction, and

rehabilitation of housing that is

affordable to very low-, low-and

moderate-income households.

H3.4.1 Program

Maintain a high priority for the

acquisition of new housing sites

near public transit and services,

the acquisition and

rehabilitation of existing

housing, and the provision for

housing-related services for

affordable housing. Seek

funding from all State and

federal programs whenever

they are available to support

the development or

rehabilitation of housing for

very low-, low-, and moderate-

income households.

Allocate CDBG funding to acquire and rehabilitate housing for very low-, low-, and moderate income households.

CDBG, State Local Housing Trust Fund

Planning and Development Services Department


H3.4.2 Program

Support and expand local

funding sources including the

City’s Housing Development

Fund, Housing Trust of Santa

Clara County, CDBG Program,

County of Santa Clara’s

Mortgage Credit Certificate

Program (MCC), or similar

Increase the

supply of

affordable

housing stock.

City Housing

Development Fund,

Housing Trust of

Santa Clara County,

CDBG, Santa Clara

County MCC

Planning and

Development

Services

Department


4.b

Packet Pg. 126




Time Frame Status

program. Continue to explore

other mechanisms to generate

revenues to increase the supply

of low- and moderate-income

housing.

H3.4.3 Program

Periodically review the housing

nexus formula required under

Chapter 16.47 of the Municipal

Code to fully reflect the impact

of new jobs on housing

demand and cost.

Continue to

evaluate the

housing nexus

formula and

adjust the

required impact

fees to account

for the housing

demand from

new

development.


Development

Services

Department

Ongoing Complete.

Housing nexus study

updated in 2016.

Development fees

evaluated and updated

annually.

H3.4.4 Program

The City will work with

affordable housing developers

to pursue opportunities to

acquire, rehabilitate, and

convert existing multi-family

developments to long-term

affordable housing units to

contribute to the City’s fair share

of the region’s housing needs.

Identify potential

sites for

acquisition and

conversion and

provide this

information to

developers.


Development

Services

Department

Within three

years of Housing

Element

adoption.

Ongoing Program.

H3.5 Policy Support the provision of

emergency shelter, transitional

housing, and ancillary services

to address homelessness.

4.b

Packet Pg. 127




Time Frame Status

H3.5.1 Program

Continue to participate in the

Santa Clara County Homeless

Collaborative as well as work

with adjacent jurisdictions to

develop additional shelter

opportunities.

Continue City staff

participation as

members of the

Collaborative’s

CDBG and Home

Program

Coordinators

Group.

City, CDBG & HOME

funds Planning and

Development

Services

Department,

City Council


Continued

participation in

regional

CDBG/housing

collaborative efforts.

H3.5.2 Program


clarify distancing requirements

for emergency shelters, stating

that “no more than one

emergency shelter shall be

permitted within a radius of 300

feet.”

Amend the

Zoning Code to

clarify distancing

requirements for

emergency

shelters.


Development

Services

Department

Adopt

amendments

within one year

of Housing

Element

adoption.

Complete.

H3.5.3 Program

Amend the Zoning Code to revise

definitions of transitional and

supportive housing to remove

reference to multiple-family

uses, and instead state that

“transitional and supportive

housing shall be considered a

residential use of property and

shall be subject only to those

restrictions that apply to other

residential dwellings of the same

type in the same zone.”

Amend the

Zoning Code to

revise

transitional and

supportive

housing

definitions.


Development

Services

Department

Adopt

amendments

within one year.

Complete.

H3.6 Policy Support the creation of

workforce housing for City and

school district employees as feasible.

4.b

Packet Pg. 128




Time Frame Status

H3.6.1 Program

Conduct a nexus study to

evaluate the creation of

workforce housing for City and

school district employees.

Create the

opportunity for

up to five units of

workforce

housing.

City of Palo Alto

Commercial

Housing Fund

Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Conduct a study

within four years

of adoption of

the Housing Element.

Complete.

City adopted

Workforce Housing

Overlay.

H4 Goal PROMOTE AN ENVIRONMENT FREE OF DISCRIMINATION AND THE BARRIERS THAT PREVENT CHOICE IN HOUSING.

H4.1 Policy Support programs and agencies that seek to eliminate housing discrimination.

H4.1.1 Program

Work with appropriate State

and federal agencies to ensure

that fair housing laws are

enforced, and continue to

support groups that provide

fair housing services, such as

the Mid-Peninsula Citizens for

Fair Housing

Continue to

coordinate with

State and federal

agencies to

support programs

to eliminate

housing

discrimination

and provide

financial support

for fair housing

services.


Development

Services

Department


The City contracts

with Project Sentinel

to provide fair

housing services.

H4.1.2 Program

Continue the efforts of the

Human Relations

Commission to combat

discrimination in rental

housing, including

mediation of problems

between landlords and

tenants.

Continue to

provide mediation

services for rental

housing

discrimination

cases.

City Funds Human

Relations

Commission,

Planning &

Community Environment


The City contracts


to provide mediation

services.

H4.1.3 Program Continue implementation of Implement City Funds Planning and Ongoing Ongoing Program.

4.b

Packet Pg. 129




Time Frame Status

City’s ordinances and State

law prohibiting discrimination

in renting or leasing housing

based on age, parenthood,

pregnancy, or the potential or

actual presence of a minor

child.

existing

ordinances

regarding

discrimination

Development

Services

Department

H4.1.4 Program

Continue the City’s role in

coordinating the actions of

various support groups that

seek to eliminate housing

discrimination and in providing

funding and other support for

these groups to disseminate fair

housing information in Palo Alto,

including information on

referrals to pertinent

investigative or enforcement

agencies in the case of fair

housing complaints.

Continue to

provide funding

and other support

for these groups

to disseminate

fair housing

information in

Palo Alto.

City Funds, Human

Services Resource

Allocation Process

(HSRAP)

Community

Services

Department


The City contracts


to provide fair

housing services.

H4.1.5 Program

Heighten community

awareness regarding and

implement the Reasonable

Accommodations procedure

for the siting, funding,

development, and use of

housing for people with

disabilities.

Continue to

provide

information to

residents on

reasonable

accommodation

procedures via

public counters

and on the City’s

website.


Development

Services

Department


H4.1.6 Program

Continue to implement the

Action Plan of the City of Palo

Provide for

increased use and

CDBG funds,

General Fund

Planning and

Development


4.b

Packet Pg. 130




Time Frame Status

Alto’s Community Development

Block Grant (CDBG)

Consolidated Plan and the

Analysis of Impediments to Fair

Housing Choice.

support of

tenant/landlord

educational

mediation

opportunities as

called for in the

CDBG Action Plan

and the Analysis

of Impediments

to Fair Housing

Choice.

Services

Department

H4.2 Policy Support housing that

incorporates facilities and

services to meet the health

care, transit, and social service

needs of households with

special needs, including seniors

and persons with disabilities.

H4.2.1 Program

Ensure that the Zoning Code

facilitates the construction of

housing that provides services

for special needs households

and provides flexible


special service housing that will

allow such housing to be built

with access to transit and

community services while

preserving the character of the

neighborhoods in which they are

proposed to be located.

Evaluate the

Zoning Code and

develop flexible

development

standards for

special service

housing.


Development

Services

Department

Evaluate the

Zoning Code

within three

years of adoption

of the Housing

Element.

Not yet complete.

Implemented pilot Safe Parking Program for homeless. Included as Housing Work Plan Program 2.4.7.

4.b

Packet Pg. 131




Time Frame Status

H4.2.2 Program

Work with the San Andreas

Regional Center to implement

an outreach program that

informs families in Palo Alto

about housing and services

available for persons with

developmental disabilities. The

program could include the

development of an

informational brochure,

including information on

services on the City’s website,

and providing housing-related

training for

individuals/families through workshops.

Provide

information

regarding

housing to

families of

persons with

developmental

disabilities.

General Fund Planning and

Development

Services

Department

Develop

outreach

program within

three years of

adoption of the

Housing

Element.

Partially Complete.

H5 Goal REDUCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF NEW AND EXISTING HOUSING.

H5.1 Policy

Reduce long-term energy costs

and improve the efficiency and

environmental performance of

new and existing homes.

H5.1.1 Program

Periodically report on the

status and progress of

implementing the City’s Green

Building Ordinance and assess

the environmental

performance and efficiency of

homes in the following areas:

- Greenhouse gas emissions

- Energy use

- Water use (indoor and outdoor)

- Material efficiency

- Storm water runoff

Prepare reports

evaluating the

progress of

implementing

the City’s Green

Building

Ordinance.

City funds,

Development fees

Planning and

Development

Services

Department,

Building Division


4.b

Packet Pg. 132




Time Frame Status

- Alternative transportation

H5.1.2 Program

Continue providing support to

staff and the public (including

architects, owners, developers

and contractors) through

training and technical assistance

in the areas listed under

Program H5.1.1.

Provide

educational

information

regarding the

City’s Green

Building

Ordinance.

City funds,

Development fees

Planning and

Development

Services

Department,

Building Division


H5.1.3 Program

Participate in regional planning

efforts to ensure that the

Regional Housing Needs

Allocation targets areas that

support sustainability by

reducing congestion and

greenhouse gas emissions.

Provide a regional

framework for

sustainability in

creating new

housing

opportunities

through the City’s

Regional Housing

Mandate

Committee.


Development

Services

Department


H5.1.4 Program

Review federal, State, and

regional programs encouraging

the improvement of

environmental performance

and efficiency in construction of

buildings, and incorporate

appropriate programs into Palo

Alto’s policies, programs and outreach efforts.

Continue to

update

regulations for

environmental

sustainability.


Development

Services

Department,

Building

Division; Public

Works &

Utilities


H5.1.5 Program

Enhance and support a proactive

public outreach program to

encourage Palo Alto residents to

conserve resources and to share

ideas about conservation.

Provide up-to-

date information

for residents

regarding

conservation

through

educational

brochures


Development

Services

Department,

Public Works &

Utilities


4.b

Packet Pg. 133




Time Frame Status

available at City

Hall and posted

on the City’s

website.

H5.1.6 Program

Provide financial subsidies,

recognition, or other incentives

to new and existing

homeowners and developers to

achieve performance or

efficiency levels beyond

minimum requirements.

Continue to

recognize

homeowners and

developers who

incorporate

sustainable

features beyond

what is required

by the Green

Building

Ordinance.


Development

Services

Department


H5.1.7 Program

In accordance with Government

Code Section 65589.7,

immediately following City

Council adoption, the City will

deliver to all public agencies or

private entities that provide

water or sewer services to

properties within Palo Alto a

copy of the 2015-2023 Housing Element.

Immediately

following

adoption, deliver

the 2015-2023

Palo Alto

Housing Element

to all providers

of sewer and

water services

within the City.


Development

Services

Department

Within one

month of

adoption of the

Housing

Element.

Complete.

4.b

Packet Pg. 134

Jurisdiction: PALO ALTO Reporting Year: 2021 (JAN 01 - DEC 31)

Total Units Permitted by Year

YEAR 011 YEAR 02 YEAR 03 YEAR 04 YEAR 05 YEAR 06 YEAR 07 YEAR 08

Income LevelRHNA Allocation by Income

Level2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Total Units

Permitted by

Income Level

Total Remaining

RHNA by Income

Level

% of RHNA

Permitted

Very Low Deed Restricted 43 58 117 218

Non-Deed Restricted 0

Low Deed Restricted 58 5 2 65

Non-Deed Restricted 0

Moderate Deed Restricted 0

Non-Deed Restricted 11 3 12 26

TOTALS 1988 286 18 89 54 107 178 212 0 944 1044 47.48%

691 473 31.55%

432 367 15.05%

108.18%

278 252 9.35%

Above Moderate 587 174 15 72 54 105 120 95 635 -48

NOTES:

1. For the Bay Area the "projection period" or the time period for which the Regional Housing Need is calculated is January 1, 2014 – October 31, 2022. The "planning period" for the Bay Area, or the time frame between the due date for one housing element and the due date for the next housing element, is January 31, 2015 – January 31, 2023. California Department of Housing & Development (HCD) combined RHNA housing production for Bay Area jurisdictions for years 2014 & 2015 for consistency.

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTHOUSING ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION

(CCR Title 25 §6202)

Table BRegional Housing Needs Allocation Progress

Permitted Units Issued by Affordability

4.c

Packet Pg. 135




Title: Accept the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 and Find the SUMC Parties in Compliance With the Development Agreement

From: City Manager


Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Review the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Annual Reports for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, and find that Stanford Hospitals & Clinics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, and Stanford University (SUMC Parties) have complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement;

2. Find that the SUMC Parties are not in default with the terms and conditions of the Agreement; and

3. Accept the City of Palo Alto’s (City) Annual Report Supplements regarding the funds received from the SUMC Parties, as required under Section 12(d) of the Development Agreement (Attachment C).

Executive Summary The City Council is required to review the SUMC Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) to ascertain compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The Agreement is between Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University (SUMC Parties), and the City of Palo Alto. The SUMC Parties submitted an Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 that summarizes the construction activities and other actions taken to fulfill the Agreement obligations. The SUMC Parties have paid approximately $44.3 million in public benefit fees to the City since June 6, 2011 through the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 reporting period. City Council reviewed and approved use of the funds contributed by SUMC for a wide variety of capital projects.

5

Packet Pg. 136


Background On June 6, 2011, the Council approved Comprehensive Plan amendments, zoning changes, a conditional use permit, annexation, and design applications for the Stanford University Medical Center Facilities Renewal and Replacement Project (the “Projects”). The Projects include the construction of a new Stanford Hospital and clinics buildings, an expansion of the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (LPCH), construction of new School of Medicine (SOM) buildings, renovation of the existing Hoover Pavilion, construction of a new medical office building and parking garage at Hoover Pavilion, roadway improvements along Welch Road and Durand Way, and SUMC design guidelines. A Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) vesting these approvals was deemed effective on June 6, 2011 and continues for thirty (30) years from the effective date. This report covers activities by the SUMC Parties for Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021, which is the tenth year of the Agreement. The last annual report prepared was for Fiscal Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020.1 Previous annual reports and compliance documentation can be found via the weblinks in Attachment D. The Agreement specifies that the City annually review the parties’ compliance.

Discussion Development Agreement Section 12, “Periodic Review of Compliance,” requires City Council to ascertain SUMC Parties’ compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The discussion items below are intended to guide City Council through the many aspects that SUMC and City staff monitor and track throughout the year to ensure compliance. The SUMC Annual Reports for FY 2020-2021 (Attachment A) describes the activities related to Agreement implementation and ongoing annual progress toward meeting the following obligations in Section 5 of the Agreement, “SUMC Parties’ Promises:”

• Health Care Benefits;

• Fiscal Benefits;

• Traffic Mitigation and Reduced Vehicle Trips;

• Linkages (Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit);

• Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods & Communities, Affordable Housing; and

• Climate Change. Staff prepared a summary of the Section 5 obligations and the staff-confirmed compliance status (Attachment B).

1 City Council Report, 11/01/21 (SUMC Annual Report, Fiscal Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020): https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2021/11-november/20211101pccs-amended.pdf

5

Packet Pg. 137

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2021/11-november/20211101pccs-amended.pdf



Development Agreement Section 12 also includes the requirement for demonstration of good faith compliance with the Agreement. Toward this end, SUMC has timely submitted all the reports required of the SUMC Parties for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. In this timeframe, City staff and SUMC have also:

• Processed applications that represent the next phase of SUMC development, including remodeling of Nursing Pod D;

• Rapidly processed SUMC applications pertaining to COVID-19 pandemic response; and

• Maintained all records necessary to complete the City’s annual review. Construction Activities and Net New Square Footage Detailed information on SUMC construction activities for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 can be found in the SUMC Annual Report (Attachment A). To summarize construction activities during this year:

• In Fiscal Year 2020-2021, the School of Medicine (SOM) Biomedical Innovation Building (BMI) received final certificate of occupancy in Spring 2021. Note that BMI received a temporary certificate of occupancy during Fiscal Year 2019-2020, but could not be tracked that year, pending receipt of final occupancy.

Overall, at the Main SUMC site, SUMC is entitled to construct and use up to 3,534,090 total square feet of hospital/clinic and research buildings, as well as associated facilities and infrastructure improvements, including up to 1,265,272 net new square feet. Overall, at the Hoover Pavilion site, SUMC is entitled to construct and use up to 153,343 total square feet of medical office/clinic buildings, as well as associated facilities, including up to 46,169 net new square feet of medical/office buildings. A total of approximately 133,731 square feet of floor area was previously demolished at the Stanford Hospital, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (LPCH), and Hoover Pavilion sites. Net new floor area across the SUMC sites reported in previous Fiscal Years include the following:

• The new Neuroscience Health Center at the Hoover Pavilion site represents 91,605 new square feet.

• Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (LPCH) Expansion added 446,088 new square feet.

• The New Stanford Hospital (NSH) garage added 29,744 new square feet. The NSH project added 689,522 new square feet. These two new buildings therefore represent 719,266 new square feet for NSH.

In Fiscal Year 2020-2021, the School of Medicine (SOM) Biomedical Innovation Building (BMI) added 196,921 square feet. With the occupancy of this new floor area, SUMC removed occupancy of some portions of the 1959 Stone Complex in Fiscal Year 2020-2021 in order to prevent exceedance of the total occupied square footage allowed in their entitlements. While not triggered in the current Fiscal Year monitoring period, there are provisions in the SUMC

5

Packet Pg. 138


entitlements to have a three-year time period (or up to five years with Planning Director approval) whereby SUMC is allowed to exceed the total occupied existing and net new building square footage. This provision is important for ensuring that SUMC can maintain existing operations while also efficiently transfer new uses, equipment, and operations over to the new facilities. City staff reviewed the information in the SUMC Annual Reports regarding construction activities and net new square footage. Staff determined that they are complete and correct. Traffic Mitigation and Reduced Vehicle Trips The SUMC Parties had made substantial progress in meeting the traffic and alternative transportation obligations of the Agreement. Specifically, they accomplished the following:

• Annually purchasing Caltrain Go Passes for all eligible employees as of January 1, 2012, which was three years ahead of the September 1, 2015 requirement in the Agreement.

• Purchasing shuttle buses for the Marguerite Shuttle service, as well as ongoing annual payments to cover the net increase in operating costs for the Marguerite Shuttle service.

• Providing annual payment to AC Transit to maintain a load factor of less than 1.0 on the U-Line.

• Hiring and maintaining a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) coordinator position since March 13, 2012, three years ahead of the September 1, 2015 requirement as stated in the Agreement, and subsequently elevating the position to a TDM Program Manager position.

SUMC achieved their 2021 alternative mode share milestone target of 33% for employee trips early and every year between 2013 and 2019. The alternative mode share rate was 38.1% in FY 2018 and 33.8% in FY 2019. The SUMC Parties maintained all TDM requirements in FY 2020 until Santa Clara County issued COVID-19 pandemic shelter-in-place orders in March 2020. On March 27, 2020, the City conditionally approved a one-year delay in the submittal of two reports; the FY 2020 Alternative Mode Share Report and Mitigation Measure TR 2.3 Enhanced Stanford University Transportation Demand Management Program (TDM) report. Conditional approval of this delay was consistent with the procedures in Section 6(p) of the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Development Agreement and no additional environmental review was required. The reasons for the conditional approval included:

1. The SUMC Parties attained mode share targets in past reporting years. 2. Stanford collects key performance information for the SUMC Alternative Mode Share

Report via a survey regularly administered in the April/May timeframe. Staff anticipated the survey responses in April/May 2020 would not reflect normal SUMC staff operations due to the shelter-in-place directives, hospital surge efforts, and other atypical commute and working parameters associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

5

Packet Pg. 139


3. The FY 2019-2020 reporting year was not a milestone target year identified in the SUMC Development Agreement Section 5(c)(ix).

In Fiscal Year 2020-2021, the SUMC parties found that the alternative mode share milestone target of 33% outlined in SUMC DA Section 5(c)(ix) was not met for 2021, nor was it above the previous 2018 milestone target of 30%. The alternative mode share rate for SUMC decreased to 28.8% between use of alternative modes versus driving alone, largely due to ongoing pandemic conditions. SUMC is in the process of analyzing which alternative modes were most significantly reduced during the pandemic and identifying potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) enhancements to their existing TDM program that might recover their previous high use of alternative transportation modes. The City is awaiting a brief memo from SUMC that outlines this analysis, the identified current challenges to meeting the alternative mode share milestone targets, and future actions that will be undertaken in Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Learning the forthcoming alternative mode share rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 will be important. If the 2022 alternative mode share rate is less than the target 33% rate, then SUMC DA Section 5(c)(ix) calls for SUMC to provide a $175,000 payment to the City for alternative transportation funding. The City would need to use the payment to support local projects and programs that encourage use of alternative transportation modes or otherwise reduce peak period traffic trips in the intersections impacted by the project. Construction Sales and Use Tax Monitoring Report SUMC submitted the annual Construction Sales & Use Tax Monitoring Report on June 30, 2021. The City sent its required response. Based upon the City’s review of the annual Construction Sales and Use Tax Monitoring Report, revenues for calendar years 2011 through 2020 have totaled $5,335,541. This annual reporting assists in the process of ensuring that the City would receive no less than $8.1M in construction sales and use tax revenue by December 31, 2025. Supplement to the Annual Report Section 12 requires the City to prepare a Supplement to the Annual Report. The Supplement is to include an accounting of the funds received from the SUMC Parties to satisfy the obligations outlined in Section 5 of the Agreement, a description of the account balances, and a summary and description of expenditures from the funds for each Fiscal Year (Attachment C). Section 12 of the Agreement mentions preparation of the Supplement within 45-days of the June and July receipt of the annual reports by SUMC, but there is no penalty for not doing so; after the close of the Fiscal Year, the City conducts an annual audit of the funds in Fall/Winter in order to demonstrate good faith in implementing the Agreement. The SUMC Parties have already paid the City approximately $44.3 million in public benefit fees since June 6, 2011 through the FY 2020-2021 reporting period. This sum includes the

5

Packet Pg. 140


approximately $11.7 million third and final payment by SUMC during the FY 2017-2018 reporting period. Regarding fund usage during the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 reporting period, the City authorized transfers for the following:

• $1,150,000 under “Expansion Cost Mitigation” for Rail Grade Separation (PL-17001), University Avenue Streetscape Upgrade (PE-21004), and Building Systems Improvements (PF-01003).

• $800,000 under “Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing” for New Public Safety Building (PE-15001)

The Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing Fund contained an original contribution of $1,720,488 for support of affordable housing. SUMC funding supported the Stevenson House project in FY 2013 and the remaining affordable housing funds were fully exhausted in FY 2020 to support the Wilton Court Housing Project. Future Use of Development Agreement Funds The funds received by the City as a result of the SUMC Development Agreement represent funding for Operations and a significant portion of funding for implementation of the City’s Capital Infrastructure Plan. For additional information about the recent past, current, and future use of Agreement funds, please refer to the following:

• Fiscal Year 2021 Adopted Operating Budget document, Special Revenue Funds section: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/79371

• Fiscal Year 2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Budget document: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/78470

• City Council Report 11877: Community and Economic Recovery Plan, including amendments to the FY 2021 Capital Improvement Plan: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/79901

• Fiscal Year 2022 Adopted Operating Budget document, Special Revenue Funds section: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/operating-budget_web.pdf; and

• Fiscal Year 2022 Adopted Capital Improvement Budget document: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/capital-budget-book-web.pdf.

In accordance with SUMC Development Agreement Section 5(a)(iii), City staff is in the process of setting up a meeting with the SUMC Parties to establish a joint committee to evaluate proposals regarding specific programs to receive funding from the Community Health and Safety Programs Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The fund is to be used for selected community health programs that benefit residents of the City. The joint committee may choose to

5

Packet Pg. 141




https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/operating-budget_web.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/operating-budget_web.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/capital-budget-book-web.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/administrative-services/city-budgets/fy-2022-city-budget/adopted-budgets/capital-budget-book-web.pdf


coordinate its efforts with the City's Human Relations Commission, and the City's representatives on the committee may be members of the Human Relations Commission. The joint committee shall make annual recommendations to the City Council regarding proposed disbursements from the Community Health and Safety Program Fund, and the City Council shall use its reasonable discretion to decide whether to accept, reject or modify the joint committee recommendations.

Resource Impact There are no impacts to the City’s budget resulting from this review of the SUMC Annual Reports for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. As stated above, the SUMC Parties have already paid approximately $44.3 million in public benefit fees to the City since June 6, 2011 through the FY 2020 reporting period. Future fund contributions are not anticipated.

Stakeholder Engagement Community members and policy makers were extensively involved in the crafting of the SUMC Development Agreement and all other associated project enabling entitlements. Also, subsequent related project entitlements continue to be processed through the City’s standard review processes, as discussed in the Development Agreement and other entitlements. For example, the proposed Nursing Pod Extension project Major Architectural Review application at 300 Pasteur Drive recently went for review before the Architectural Review Board.2

Policy Implications This report does not represent any changes to existing City policies.

Environmental Review Finding the SUMC Parties in compliance with the Terms of the Agreement is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and no environmental assessment is required for the annual compliance review. An environmental impact report for the entire SUMC project was prepared and certified by the City Council prior to approval of the Agreement. Attachments:

• Attachment5.a: Attachment A: SUMC Annual Report FY 2020-2021

• Attachment5.b: Attachment B: SUMC Development Agreement, Section 5 - SUMC Parties’ Promises

• Attachment5.c: Attachment C: Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Supplement

• Attachment5.d: Attachment D: Weblinks to Prior SUMC Annual Reports

2 300 Pasteur: 21PLN00235 - SUMC Nursing Pod Extension (1st Formal) Major Architectural Review Staff Report for February 3, 2022 (https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/architectural-review-board/2022/arb-02.03.2022-300-pasteur.pdf).

5

Packet Pg. 142

PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF PALO ALTO | JULY 6, 20212020-21 ANNUAL REPORT

Image Courtesy of Nearmap US Inc, May 2021

5.a

Packet Pg. 143

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 2

2020-2021 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS 3

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL 3STANFORD HEALTH CARE 4SCHOOL OF MEDICINE 5NET NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE 6

COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OBLIGATIONS 7

HEALTH CARE BENEFITS 7SECTION 5(a)(ii). FUND FOR HEALTHCARE SERVICES 7SECTION 5(a)(iii). FUND FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAMS 7

PALO ALTO FISCAL BENEFITS 7SECTIONS 5(b)(i) AND 5(B)(II). PAYMENT OF SALES AND USE TAXES 8SECTION 5(b)(iii). FUNDING OF OPERATING DEFICIT 8SECTION 5(b)(iv). PAYMENT OF UTILITY USER TAX 9SECTION 5(b)(v). SCHOOL FEES 9

TRAFFIC MITIGATION AND REDUCED VEHICLE TRIPS 9SECTION 5(c)(ii). MENLO PARK TRAFFIC MITIGATION 9SECTION 5(c)(iii). EAST PALO ALTO VOLUNTARY MITIGATION 9SECTION 5(c)(iv). CONTRIBUTIONS TO AC TRANSIT 10SECTION 5(c)(v). OPTICOM PAYMENTS 10SECTION 5(c)(vi). CALTRAIN GO PASSES 10SECTION 5(c)(vii). MARGUERITE SHUTTLE SERVICE 10SECTION 5(c)(viii). TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT COORDINATOR 11SECTION 5(c)(ix). MONITORING OF TDM PROGRAMS 11

LINKAGES 12SECTION 5(d)(i). INTERMODAL TRANSIT FUND 12SECTION 5(d)(ii). QUARRY ROAD FUND 12SECTION 5(d)(iii). STANFORD BARN CONNECTION 12

INFRASTRUCTURE, SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITIES, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING 13SECTION 5(e). 13

CLIMATE CHANGE 14SECTION 5(f). CLIMATE CHANGE FUND 14

SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 14SECTION 5(h). SATISFACTION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 14

CONCLUSION 15

5.a

Packet Pg. 144

ANNUAL REPORT 2020-21 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On June 6, 2011, the Stanford University Medical Center parties (now Stanford Medicine)—comprised of Stanford Hospital and Clinics (now Stanford Health Care), Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, and Stanford University—entered into a Development Agreement with the City of Palo Alto, committing to provide a range of community benefits in exchange for vested development rights to develop and use the Stanford Medicine Renewal and Replacement Project (“Renewal Project”) facilities in accordance with the approvals granted by the City, and a streamlined process for obtaining subsequent project approvals. The Renewal Project—driven by a growing demand for healthcare services, state-mandated seismic safety requirements, and the need to replace outmoded facilities with modern, technologically advanced spaces—is transforming the way that healthcare is delivered and research is conducted.

Today, ten years after the execution of the Development Agreement, the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion and the new Stanford Hospital are now open for patient care, and the School of Medicine has completed the first phase of development of its replacement facilities, with its BioMedical Innovations building now open for research. Interior renovations within the 1989 potion of the preexisting Stanford Hospital facility have now commenced, and are expected to continue for the next several years, bringing the facility up to modern healthcare standards.

Against this backdrop, Stanford Medicine submits its Annual Report in compliance with Section 12(c) of the Development Agreement, and looks forward to continued collaboration with the City of Palo Alto in advancing the goals of both Stanford Medicine and the broader community.

5.a

Packet Pg. 145

2 ANNUAL REPORT 2020-21

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Palo Alto City Council’s unanimous approval of the entitlements for the Stanford Medicine Renewal and Replacement Project in July 2011 has paved the way for a historic investment in new and replacement facilities for Stanford Medicine. The project approvals—including new zoning for the Renewal Project sites, a conditional use permit, architectural review approval, and the execution of a Development Agreement—allow for the construction of approximately 1.3 million net new square feet of hospital facilities, clinics, medical offices, and medical research spaces, is enabling the Hospitals to optimize the delivery of healthcare services to patients, and maintain their position as leading providers of world-class healthcare.

In order to facilitate this important replacement and expansion work, the Stanford Medicine parties entered into a Development Agreement with the City of Palo Alto, which includes a comprehensive package of community benefits and additional development conditions. In exchange for these benefits, the City has vested for a period of 30 years Stanford Medicine’s rights to develop and use the property in accordance with the project approvals, and agreed to streamline the process for obtaining subsequent approvals.

The terms of the Development Agreement (Section 12(c)) provide for a periodic review of compliance, and require that Stanford Medicine submit an Annual Report to the City of Palo Alto’s Director of Planning and Community Environment each year within 30 days of the anniversary of the agreement effective date (June 6, 2011). The Annual Report is to summarize Stanford Medicine’s progress on the Renewal Project, including a list of net new square footage for which a certificate of occupancy has been received, and a description of the steps that Stanford Medicine has taken to comply with the obligations listed in Section 5 of the Development Agreement. With this report, Stanford Medicine fulfills these requirements. Within 45 days of receipt of this Annual Report, the City will prepare a Supplement to the Annual Report, to provide an accounting of the City’s balances and expenditures from each of the City Funds and how they were used.

5.a

Packet Pg. 146


2020-2021 SUMMARY OF PROGRESS

The Renewal Project has reached key milestones in recent years, with the opening of the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital expansion in 2017 and the opening of the New Stanford Hospital in 2019, and most recently the opening of the School of Medicine’s BioMedical Innovations building in 20201 . While the COVID-19 pandemic changed the pace of progress on the Renewal Project, as Stanford Medicine focused resources on pandemic response, including launching clinical trials for therapeutic treatments for COVID-19 and establishing community testing and vaccination sites, it has also highlighted the importance of modern, state-of-the-art facilities to support Stanford Medicine’s research and patient care.

The section to follow provides an overview of central goals for the project elements that presently are under construction or nearing construction, a synopsis of progress to date, as well as a preview of near-term upcoming activities.

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL

In response to growing community needs for specialized pediatric and obstetric care, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital opened an expanded facility in late 2017. The new Main building, located adjacent to the preexisting Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital (West building), provides patients and doctors with the most modern clinical advancements and technology, while also creating a more patient- and family-centered environment of care, with additional single-patient rooms and more spaces for families to be with their child during treatment and recovery.

The LPCH Main building features a new entrance lobby, public concourse with dining, three floors of nursing units, and new patient rooms. Spaces have been designed with an attention to natural light and views, and the exterior grounds—more than 3.5 acres of outdoor areas and gardens—provide a park-like setting for patients, families, and visitors.

1 Temporary certificate of occupancy was issued in 2020; final certificate of occupancy was issued in 2021.

5.a

Packet Pg. 147


In December 2017, the new facility received its license from the State Department of Public Health; this constituted issuance of an occupancy permit for purposes of the Development Agreement. In Winter 2019, additional shelled spaces within the Main building were completed and opened to patient care, including the Bass Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Diseases on the 5th floor, and the Betty Irene Moore Children’s Outpatient Heart Center on the 1st floor.

STANFORD HEALTH CARE

Stanford Health Care is constructing new and replacement hospital facilities to usher in a new era of advanced patient care. Growth in patient volumes and rapidly changing medical technology have rendered much of the existing midcentury hospital infrastructure inadequate, while new seismic safety requirements have accelerated the need to construct replacement facilities.

In November 2019, Stanford Health Care’s first phase of facilities renewal completed as the New Stanford Hospital received its license from the State Department of Public Health and opened to patient care. With the new Stanford Hospital now complete, Stanford Health Care has begun a series of renovations within its preexisting facilities, including the conversion of shared patient rooms into private rooms within the 1989 portion of the Hospital; this renovation work is planned to proceed in phases over the next several years. In addition, to continue to maintain its current 600-bed count upon conversion of existing shared patient rooms to private rooms, Stanford Health Care is proposing an addition to the preexisting Hospital of approximately 38,000 square feet. This proposed addition was brought before the Architectural Review Board for preliminary feedback in April 2021, and Stanford Health Care anticipates submitting a Major Architectural Review application for this scope in Summer 2021.


5.a

Packet Pg. 148


SCHOOL OF MEDICINE

The Stanford University School of Medicine is replacing its outmoded research buildings with new state-of-the-art facilities designed to support contemporary translational research. The new facilities will accommodate 21st century medical advancements and enable the development of new medical innovations, featuring integrated laboratory suites, with easier access between labs and support facilities, enabling transparency, flexibility, and collaboration.

The first phase of School of Medicine development (BioMedical Innovations Building 1, or “BMI-1”) is now complete, having received a certificate of occupancy in Spring 2021, and features four above-grade floors of research labs and light-filled gathering places, and a lower basement level for utility support, as well as a connective tunnel to other nearby research facilities. Building interiors were designed for best practices for laboratory design safety and space allocation, with a flexible template to maximize efficient use of space and ease of renovation. The four above-grade floors provide space for a mix of disciplines, basic and clinical research, wet and dry labs, and leading-edge translational studies.


5.a

Packet Pg. 149



NET NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE

The following table summarizes the net new square footage for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued.

PROJECT COMPONENT GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE

STANFORD HEALTH CARE1101 Welch demolished (40,100)500 Pasteur2 719,266 Total 679,166

LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL EXPANSION701 Welch demolished (56,300)703 Welch demolished (23,500)Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Expansion 446,088Total 366,288

SCHOOL OF MEDICINEBioMedical Innovations building 196,921Partial decant of 1959 Stone Complex (8,640) Total 188,281

HOOVER PAVILIONMiscellaneous shops and storage demolished (13,831)Stanford Neuroscience Health Center (Hoover MOB) 91,605 Total 77,774

2 Final gross floor area calculation as confirmed under Building Permit # 12000-00444.

5.a

Packet Pg. 150


COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OBLIGATIONS

This section of the Annual Report summarizes the steps that Stanford Medicine has taken to comply with its obligations under Section 5 of the Development Agreement.

HEALTH CARE BENEFITS

In addition to the health care funds listed below, Stanford Medicine provides certain intrinsic benefits to the community, as both a global leader in medical care and research, and as a community healthcare services provider. The Renewal Project enables Stanford Medicine to continue its important work, and the addition of more beds for adults and children will help to alleviate overcrowding. Additionally, the new hospital facilities provide critical emergency preparedness and response resources for the community in the event of an earthquake, pandemic, or other major disaster.

Section 5(a)(ii). Fund for Healthcare ServicesThe Hospitals have designated the amount of $3 million for Healthcare Services, which will increase to $5.6 million by December 31, 2025. No further action is required until 2026. This amount will be reconciled with the construction use tax payments as described in Development Agreement Section 5(b)(ii)(C), and will be spent between 2026 and 2036.

Section 5(a)(iii). Fund for Community Health and Safety ProgramsStanford Medicine has contributed a single lump-sum payment of $4 million to establish a Community Health and Safety Program Fund for the City of Palo Alto. This fund is to be distributed to selected community health programs that benefit residents of the City, including the Project Safety Net Program, a community-based mental health plan for youth well-being in Palo Alto. A joint committee is to be established to evaluate proposals regarding the other specific programs to receive funding, composed of two representatives selected by Stanford Medicine and two representatives selected by the City; this committee shall make annual recommendations to the City Council regarding proposed disbursements from the Community Health and Safety Program Fund, and the City Council shall use its reasonable discretion to decide whether to accept, reject, or modify the joint committee recommendations.

Stanford Medicine provided the entire required contribution to the Community Health and Safety Program Fund on August 25, 2011. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision, though Stanford Medicine welcomes the opportunity to participate in the joint committee to evaluate proposals for programs to receive funding. As required by Development Agreement Section 12(d), the City will provide yearly Supplements to the Annual Report to provide an accounting of the City's expenditures from this fund, and the purposes for which the expenditures were used.

PALO ALTO FISCAL BENEFITS

The Stanford Medicine Renewal Project brings considerable fiscal benefits to the City of Palo Alto. The project is expected to generate $8.1 million in sales and use tax revenues for the City, and multiple mechanisms have been put into place to ensure that this target is met. The Development Agreement also provides for further fiscal benefits to the City, including a payment by Stanford Medicine to fund the City’s operating deficit, and the payment of utility user taxes and school fees.

5.a

Packet Pg. 151


Sections 5(b)(i) and 5(b)(ii). Payment of Sales and Use TaxesAs required by the Development Agreement, Stanford Medicine submitted its annual Construction Sales and Use Tax monitoring report to the City on June 30, 2021. The Stanford Medicine parties will continue to submit such a report annually during the construction period for the Renewal Project so that the City can determine the share of construction use taxes that it has received as a result of the Renewal Project. Each year, within 60 days of receiving the monitoring report, the City will provide its determination of the amount of construction use taxes that it has received as a result of the Renewal Project during the preceding calendar year. In August 2026 or soon thereafter, Stanford Medicine and the City will conduct a reconciliation process to confirm that the City has received at least $8.1 million in construction use taxes as a result of the Renewal Project, as further described in Development Agreement Section 5(b)(ii).

To date, Stanford Medicine has taken the following steps detailed below to maximize the City's allocation of sales and use taxes associated with Project construction and operation. Documentation of each of these items is included in the 2020 construction use tax monitoring report already submitted. Note that in 2020, as identified in the construction use tax monitoring report, Stanford Medicine did not have active construction projects which qualified for participation in the program, and instead reported only self-accruals associated with owner purchases; however, in 2021, with the commencement of Stanford Health Care’s interior renovations at the preexisting Hospital, contractor participation in the program has resumed and will be reflected in the next annual monitoring report.

• Stanford Medicine has obtained all permits and licenses necessary to maximize the City’s allocation of construction use taxes derived from the project, including California Seller’s Permits and Use Tax Direct Pay Permits.

• Stanford Medicine has designated and required all contractors and subcontractors to designate the project site as the place of sale of all fixtures furnished or installed as part of the project.

• Stanford Medicine has designated and required all contractors and subcontractors to designate the project site as the place of use of all materials used in the construction of the project.

• Stanford Medicine has required all contractors and subcontractors to allocate the local sales and use taxes derived from their contracts directly to the City. Stanford Medicine has used best efforts to require contractors and subcontractors to complete and file any forms required by the State Board of Equalization to effect these designations.

• Both Hospitals have obtained use tax direct pay permits from the State of California for their existing facilities in order to increase the City tax allocation for the Hospitals’ purchases. The Hospitals will maintain the use tax direct pay permit for the life of the project.

• Finally, Stanford Medicine has assisted the City in establishing and administering a Retail Sales and Use Tax Reporting District for the Renewal Project, to enable the City to track the generation, allocation, reporting and payment of sales and use taxes derived from the Project.

Section 5(b)(iii). Funding of Operating DeficitIn order to assure that City costs associated with the Renewal Project do not exceed revenues to the City resulting from construction and operation of the project, Stanford Medicine has provided to the City a single lump sum payment in the amount of $2,417,000. This payment was made on August 25, 2011. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision.


5.a

Packet Pg. 152


Section 5(b)(iv). Payment of Utility User TaxStanford Medicine will pay the City a utility user tax at a minimum rate of 5 percent of all electricity, gas, and water charges allocable to new construction completed as part of the project for the life of the project. This rate may be increased by the City as provided by Section 2.35.100(b) of the Municipal Code. The 5 percent utility user tax is currently being paid by Stanford Medicine.

Section 5(b)(v). School FeesStanford Medicine will pay to the City—which is then to forward to the Palo Alto Unified School District—school fees upon issuance of each building permit from the City or OSHPD, in the amount that is generally applicable to non-residential development at the time of payment based upon net new square footage, as defined in the Development Agreement.

School fees were paid in 2012 for LPCH and SHC in the amounts of $188,815 and $153,802, respectively. In July 2013, additional school fees were paid in the amount of $7,051 to account for additional program square footage for the New Stanford Hospital and Garage. In May 2014, an additional payment of school fees in the amount of $16,119 was made to account for the incremental square footage associated with the Hoover Medical Office Building, beyond the 60,000 square feet originally planned. In November 2015, additional school fees in the amount of $461.16 were paid to account for incremental square footage for the New Stanford Hospital Garage.

TRAFFIC MITIGATION AND REDUCED VEHICLE TRIPS

Stanford Medicine has taken a number of steps to mitigate the potential traffic impacts projected at full project buildout. Stanford Medicine provides a robust transportation demand management program, offering a variety of incentives for employees to forego driving alone to work. As required by the Development Agreement, Stanford Medicine has taken the additional actions outlined below.

Section 5(c)(ii). Menlo Park Traffic MitigationStanford Medicine agreed to contribute to the City of Menlo Park a total of $3,699,000 for use in connection with traffic mitigation, infrastructure enhancements, and the promotion of sustainable neighborhoods and communities and affordable housing. This contribution has been made in three equal payments; the first payment of $1,233,000 was made on August 19, 2011. The second payment of $1,233,000 was made on December 5, 2012, following the November 2012 issuance of the first Hospital foundation permit. The final payment in the amount of $1,233,000 was made on December 14, 2017, within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision.

Section 5(c)(iii). East Palo Alto Voluntary MitigationStanford Medicine has contributed a single lump sum payment of $200,000 to East Palo Alto to be used for roadway and traffic signal improvements on University Avenue. This payment was made on August 19, 2011. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision. In the event that Stanford Medicine does not meet alternative transportation mode goals specified in the Development Agreement by 2025 and is assessed a $4 million payment under Development Agreement section 5(c)(ix)(B), the City will be required to remit $150,000 of such payment to the City of East Palo Alto.


5.a

Packet Pg. 153


Section 5(c)(iv). Contributions to AC TransitThe Hospitals committed to the following actions within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit, and have fulfilled these commitments as outlined below:

• The Hospitals agreed to offer a one-time payment of $250,000 to AC Transit to be used for capital improvements to the U-Line to increase capacity (Section 5(c)(iv)(A)). As required, the Hospitals offered to contribute $250,000 to AC Transit for capital improvements to the U Line; this offer was accepted, and the payment was made on January 5, 2018.

• The Hospitals agreed to offer to make annual payments to AC Transit in a reasonable amount, not to exceed $50,000, to be used for operating costs of the U-Line to maintain a load factor for bus service to the Medical Center of less than 1 (Section 5(c)(iv)(B)). The Hospitals are making annual payments to AC Transit for purposes of U-Line operating costs.

• In order to encourage Hospital employees living in the East Bay to use public transit for their commute, the Hospitals committed to using best efforts to lease 75 parking spaces at the Ardenwood Park and Ride lot, or an equivalent location, at a cost not to exceed $45,000 per year (Section 5(c)(iv)(C)). The Hospitals continue to meet this requirement, and currently lease 100 parking spaces in Newark (35263 Fircrest Drive). However, the Fircrest-Ardenwood route that provided service to these spaces was suspended in December 2020 due to the pandemic reducing demand and resulting low ridership. East Bay riders continue to be served by the U Line and DB Express.

Section 5(c)(v). Opticom PaymentsWithin 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit, the Hospitals committed to pay $11,200 to the City of Palo Alto to be used for the installation of Opticom traffic control systems at the following seven intersections: El Camino Real/Palm Drive/University Avenue; El Camino Real/Page Mill Road; Middlefield Road/Lytton Road; Junipero Serra/Page Mill Road; Junipero Serra/Campus Drive West; Galvez/Arboretum; and the Alpine/280 Northbound ramp. However, since the time that this commitment was made, the City determined that Opticom systems are outdated, and proposed the purchase and installation of the ATMS.now Emergency.now package, which would allow coordinated prioritization at all City-maintained traffic signals. Agreement to this change in traffic signal priority system is documented in a letter dated December 12, 2017 from the City Manager to the SUMC Parties, which was accepted and agreed to by the SUMC Parties by countersigned letter. The required payment was made on December 12, 2017, within 30 days of issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit.

Section 5(c)(vi). Caltrain GO PassesThe Development Agreement requires that the Hospitals purchase annual Caltrain GO Passes for all existing and new Hospital employees who work more than 20 hours per week at a cost of up to approximately $1.8 million per year, beginning on September 1, 2015. This obligation is expected to continue for a period of 51 years.

Hospital management accelerated the purchase of the annual GO Pass for Hospital employees, and began providing free GO Passes to employees commencing on January 1, 2012. Annual passes were purchased again for all existing and new eligible employees for 2021.

Section 5(c)(vii). Marguerite Shuttle ServiceThe Hospitals will fund the reasonable costs, in an approximate amount of $2 million, for the purchase of additional shuttle vehicles for the Marguerite shuttle service, as and when required to meet increased


5.a

Packet Pg. 154


demand for shuttle service between the project sites and the Palo Alto Intermodal Transit Station. In addition, the Hospitals will fund as annual payments the reasonable costs, in an approximate amount of $450,000 per year, to cover the net increase in operating costs for the Marguerite Shuttle. Demand for the Marguerite shuttle increased in 2012, and the Hospitals funded the purchase of three new hybrid shuttles to meet this increased demand. Since this time, the Hospitals have funded as annual payments the reasonable costs of the net increase in operating costs for the Marguerite Shuttle.

Section 5(c)(viii). Transportation Demand Management CoordinatorThe Development Agreement requires that the Hospitals employ an onsite qualified Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Coordinator for Stanford Medicine, commencing on September 1, 2015, and continuing through the life of the Renewal Project.

Because the Hospitals accelerated the purchase of the Caltrain GO Pass, the Hospitals also accelerated the hiring of the TDM Coordinator, filling this position in March 2012. The TDM Coordinator is responsible for overseeing the analysis, development, and implementation of programs to advance the Hospitals’ TDM objectives. Specific duties that are carried out in collaboration with Stanford Transportation include raising awareness among commuters about alternative transportation options and Stanford’s commute incentive programs; providing alternative commute planning assistance and responses to customer inquiries; writing and editing electronic and print communications; coordinating and staffing outreach events, such as free transit pass distributions and employee fairs; and providing alternative transportation information and resources at new employee orientations.

In addition, the TDM Coordinator is responsible for overseeing the Transportation Hub within the new Stanford Hospital. The Transportation Hub serves as an alternative transportation information center available to both staff and patients, and includes a monitor screen (Transit Screen) that displays all mobility options in the area at a glance, in real time.

Section 5(c)(ix). Monitoring of TDM ProgramsThe Hospitals are required to submit annual monitoring reports showing the current number of employees employed over 20 hours per week; the number of employees using an alternative transportation mode as documented by a study or survey to be completed by the Hospitals using a method mutually agreeable to the City and the Hospitals; and the efforts used by the Hospitals to attempt to achieve the Alternative Mode Targets identified in the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement specifies payments to be made in the event that such targets are not met during particular time periods. Stanford Medicine submitted its 2021 Alternative Mode Share Report to the City on May 28, 2021; this report shows an alternative mode split of 28.8% for the Hospitals, representing a significant drop in alternative mode share since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The shift from alternative modes to single-occupancy vehicles among on-campus Hospital staff is consistent with generally observed changes in transit behavior during the pandemic, with the key difference that the Hospitals’ on-campus employees largely do not have the ability to perform work remotely, as they primarily occupy roles which require direct patient interface or otherwise require physical presence. Given reductions in transit service and concerns over the safety of public transportation during the pandemic, the reduction of 5 percentage points in the Hospitals’ alternative mode share from the most recent reporting year can be more easily understood. Stanford Medicine remains committed to increasing its alternative mode share, and enabling employees to travel safely to work using alternative modes.


5.a

Packet Pg. 155


LINKAGES

To further encourage use of Caltrain, bus, and other transit services, and to enhance and encourage use of pedestrian and bicycle connections between Stanford Medicine and downtown Palo Alto, Stanford Medicine has funded the following specific infrastructure improvements.

Section 5(d)(i). Intermodal Transit FundStanford Medicine has provided to the City one lump sum payment of $2.25 million for improvements to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connection from the Palo Alto Intermodal Transit Center to the existing intersection of El Camino Real and Quarry Road. Up to $2 million of this amount is to be used by the City for the development of an attractive, landscaped passive park/green space with a clearly marked and lighted pedestrian pathway, benches, and flower borders. Stanford Medicine paid the entire required amount for the Intermodal Transit Fund on August 25, 2011. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision. As required by Development Agreement Section 12(d), the City will provide yearly Supplements to the Annual Report to provide an accounting of the City's expenditures from this fund, and the purposes for which the expenditures were used.

In Summer 2017, prior to issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit, the City completed a temporary path with associated lighting, landscaping / green space, benches, and flower borders from the transit center to the existing crosswalk at the intersection of El Camino Real and Quarry Road. Available funds remaining (approximately $1.69 million) will be applied to the construction of permanent improvements in the future.

Section 5(d)(ii). Quarry Road FundStanford Medicine has provided to the City one lump sum payment of $400,000 for improvements to and within the public right-of-way to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connection from the west side of El Camino Real to Welch Road along Quarry Road, including urban design elements and way finding, wider bicycle lanes, as necessary, on Quarry Road, enhanced transit nodes for bus and/or shuttle stops, and prominent bicycle facilities. Stanford Medicine paid the entire required amount for the Quarry Road Fund on August 25, 2011. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision. As required by Development Agreement Section 12(d), the City will provide yearly Supplements to the Annual Report to provide an accounting of the City's expenditures from this fund, and the purposes for which the expenditures were used. The City was required to construct the improvements prior to issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit, but as agreed to with Stanford Medicine, delayed implementation of these improvements until utility trenching to the Medical Center was complete. In late 2018, the City completed these improvements, including enhanced crosswalks and bicycle striping and signage.

Section 5(d)(iii). Stanford Barn ConnectionStanford Medicine agreed to construct up to $700,000 of improvements to enhance the pedestrian connection between the Main Medical Campus and the Stanford Shopping Center from Welch Road to Vineyard Lane, in the area adjacent to the Stanford Barn prior to issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy permit. Construction of the improvements completed in November 2017, in advance of issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy permit. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision.


5.a

Packet Pg. 156


INFRASTRUCTURE, SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITIES, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Section 5(e). Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing FundStanford Medicine agreed to contribute a total amount of $23.2 million toward City of Palo Alto infrastructure, sustainable neighborhoods and communities, and affordable housing. As required by the Development Agreement, this contribution has been made in three equal payments. The first payment, in the amount of $7,733,333, was made on August 25, 2011; the second payment of $7,733,333 was made on December 5, 2012, following the November 2012 issuance of the first Hospital foundation permit; and the final payment of $7,733,333 was made on December 12, 2017, within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision. As required by Development Agreement Section 12(d), the City will provide yearly Supplements to the Annual Report to provide an accounting of the City's expenditures from this fund, and the purposes for which the expenditures were used.

The City will use $1,720,488 of these funds in the same manner as funds collected under the City’s housing fee ordinance.


5.a

Packet Pg. 157


CLIMATE CHANGE

Section 5(f). Climate Change FundStanford Medicine agreed to contribute a total amount of $12 million toward City projects and programs for a sustainable community, including programs identified in the City’s Climate Action Plan, carbon credits, and investments in renewable energy and energy conservation. As required by the Development Agreement, this contribution has been made in three equal payments. The first payment, in the amount of $4 million, was made on August 25, 2011; the second payment of $4 million was made on December 5, 2012, following the November 2012 issuance of the first Hospital foundation permit; and the final payment of $4 million was made on December 12, 2017, within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital occupancy permit. No further action is required by Stanford Medicine to comply with this Development Agreement provision. As required by Development Agreement Section 12(d), the City will provide yearly Supplements to the Annual Report to provide an accounting of the City's expenditures from this fund, and the purposes for which the expenditures were used.

SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

Section 5(h). Satisfaction of All Conditions of ApprovalStanford Medicine will satisfy all Conditions of Approval by the dates and within the time periods required by the project approvals, subject to modifications allowed by the Development Agreement, and has taken several steps in order to ensure that this requirement is met (Section 5(h)). The Conditions of Approval encompass conditions imposed by the Architectural Review Board, mitigation measures enumerated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit.


In order to implement, monitor, and report on the implementation of this diverse array of conditions, Stanford Medicine, with input from City planning staff, has created two Excel spreadsheet tracking and reporting tools. These spreadsheets serve as a centralized repository for compliance monitoring information and documentation, and are updated by the Stanford Medicine project teams on a regular basis, and reviewed by the City.

5.a

Packet Pg. 158


CONCLUSION

As the Renewal Project completes its tenth year, Stanford Medicine looks forward to continued engagement with the City of Palo Alto as the project continues to progress.

5.a

Packet Pg. 159

SUMC Development Agreement, Section 5 - SUMC Parties’ Promises FY 2020-2021

1 SUMC Development Agreement Compliance: FY 2020-2021

DA Section

Description Summary Activity Complies?

Health Care Benefits

5(a)(ii) Fund for

Healthcare Services

Financial assistance for Palo Alto

residents

SUMC establishment of a $3M fund that will grow to $5.6M by December 31, 2025. Fund will be used in even increments over a ten-year period from 2026-2036 to assist Palo

Alto residents who have self-payment responsibilities beyond their financial means, as described in Section 5(a)(ii).

Yes, complies – No activity required in FY 2020-2021.

5(a)(iii)

Fund for Community Health and

Safety Programs

$4M fund for

selected community health programs for Palo Alto residents

First and only payment of $4M on August 25, 2011 to establish City fund. No joint

committee between City Council and SUMC established to date to evaluate other

proposals/programs to receive funding, so no there were no expenditures from this fund other than on Project Safety Net, as

already specified in the Development Agreement. .

Yes, complies - Fund activity and balances in

reported in Attachment C.

Fiscal Benefits

5(b)(i), (ii) Payment of

Sales and Use Taxes

Activities to

maximize sales and use taxes paid to the

City

SUMC contributes to General Fund Sales and

Use Tax revenues via construction-related activities. The City reviews the Construction Sales & Use Tax Monitoring Report that is

submitted by SUMC on June 30 of each year. The City submits a letter to SUMC each year

Yes, complies - SUMC timely submitted the Construction Sales & Use Tax Monitoring Report for the previous calendar year. The City sent their required

Attachment B 5.b

Packet Pg. 160



DA Section


that notes local tax received from SUMC project activities for the year. Based upon

the City’s review of the annual Construction Sales and Use Tax Monitoring Report,

revenues for calendar years 2011 through 2020 have totaled $5,335,541.

response. This annual reporting assists in the process of ensuring that the City would receive no less than $8.1M in construction sales and tax revenue by December 31, 2025.

5(b)(iii)

Funding of Operating Deficit /

Expansion Cost Mitigation

$2.417M fund to assure City costs

associated with the project do not

exceed revenues resulting from

construction and operation of the

project.

Payment of $2.417M on August 25, 2011 to

establish fund. There were expenditures from this fund during the reporting period

FY 2020-2021.

Yes, complies -Fund

activity and balances in FY 2020-2021 reported in

Attachment C.

5(b)(iv) Payment of

Utility Users Tax

5% tax on all

electricity, gas and water charges on new construction

Utilities confirmed that billing accounts

were created in past fiscal years when new meters were set for new construction,

including NSH, NSH Garage, LPCH, and BMI, and the Utility Users Tax has been paid

through the normal billing process for each site.

Yes, complies.

Attachment B 5.b

Packet Pg. 161



DA Section


5(b)(v)

School Fees

Payment of PAUSD

fees for net new square footage

$342,617 fee paid for LPCH and NSH

expansion in 2012. $7,051 fee paid for NSH and NSH Garage expansion in July 2013.

$16,119 fee paid for Hoover Medical Office Building expansion in May 2014. $461.16 fee

paid to account for incremental square footage for the New Stanford Hospital

Garage.

Yes, complies - SUMC

made payments to PAUSD for all net new square

footage for which school fees apply at the time

permit receipt.

Traffic Mitigation and Reduced Vehicle Trips

DA Section


5(c)(ii) Menlo Park

Traffic Mitigation

$3,699,000 payment for traffic mitigation,

infrastructure, sustainable

neighborhoods, affordable housing

First of three $1.23M payments made on

August 19, 2011. Second payment of $1.23M made on December 5, 2012. Third

and final payment of $1.23M made on December 14, 2017, which was within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital

Occupancy Permit (LPCH).

Yes, complies - SUMC made all required

payments to Menlo Park, including the last and final payment in FY 2017-2018.

5(c)(iii) East Palo Alto

Voluntary Mitigation

$200K for roadway

and signal improvements on

University Ave.

$200K payment made on August 19, 2011.

Yes, complies.

Attachment B 5.b

Packet Pg. 162



5(c)(iv) Contributions to AC Transit

U-line capital

improvements, low load factor ratios, parking spaces at

Ardenwood Park & Ride

$250K payment made to AC Transit on

January 5, 2018. SUMC is also invoiced by AC Transit for

payments over the year that total over the $50K per year discussed in the SUMC

Development Agreement. Payments to AC Transit are required for the life of the

project. Since May 2014 and until April 30, 2018,

SUMC Parties leased a park-and-ride facility on Kaiser Drive near the Ardenwood Park &

Ride. SUMC used an interim temporary facility through FY 2019-2020 and leased

100 parking spaces in Newark (35263 Fircrest Drive) in FY 2020-2021.

Yes, complies.

5(c)(v) Opticom

Payments

$11,200 payment for Opticom traffic control system at 7

intersections

$11.2K payment made to the City in FY

2017-2018 within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit (LPCH). As the City has upgraded systems, the City

and SUMC agreed through a letter exchange that the payment could be used for the new coordinated prioritization signaling at City-

maintained traffic signals.

Yes, complies.

5(c)(vi) Caltrain Go

Passes

SUMC purchase of

passes for all

Go Passes have been purchased per the Development Agreement since January 1,

2012, including for FY 2020-2021. Yes, complies.

5.b

Packet Pg. 163



existing and new hospital employees

working >20hrs/week

5(c)(vii) Marguerite

Shuttle Service

Purchase of additional shuttles to meet demand

Since 2011, SUMC purchased additional shuttle buses for the Marguerite Shuttle

service which now includes five renewable diesel-electric hybrid buses and 23 all-

electric buses. Additional all-electric buses also came online in FY 2017-2018. Shuttles

were running in FY 2020-2021.

Yes, complies.

DA Section


5(c)(viii)

SUMC

Transportation Demand

Management (TDM)

Coordinator

SUMC hires coordinator to

promote alternative transportation

options

TDM Coordinator was hired in March 2012. This position has since been elevated to a TDM Program Manager position and the

position remains filled.

Yes, complies.

5(c)(ix)

Monitoring of TDM Programs

Yearly report regarding

SUMC timely submitted the Alternative

Mode Share Report for FY 2020-2021. The SUMC parties found that the alternative

mode share milestone target of 33%

Yes, complies - SUMC timely submitted their

report. Monitoring in FY 2021-2022 will identify if

5.b

Packet Pg. 164



alternative transit mode use

outlined in SUMC DA Section 5(c)(ix) was not met for 2021, nor was it above the previous

2018 milestone target of 30%; the alternative mode share rate for SUMC

decreased to 28.8% between use of alternative modes versus driving alone,

largely due to ongoing pandemic conditions.

SUMC missed the alternative mode share target of 33% for two

consecutive years.

Linkages

5(d)(i)

Intermodal

Transit Fund

$2.25M payment to improve pedestrian

linkages to PA Intermodal Transit

Center

First and only payment of $2.25M on August

25, 2011 to establish City fund. City constructed temporary improvements prior

to the issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit (LPCH) to serve the

linkage goal and functional requirements.

Yes, complies -Fund

activity and balances in FY 2020-2021 reported in

Attachment C.

5(d)(ii) Quarry Road

Fund

$400K payment to

improve pedestrian linkages along Quarry Road

First and only payment of $400K on August

25, 2011 to establish City fund. City constructed the improvements prior to the

issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit (LPCH) to serve the linkage goal and

functional requirements.

Yes, complies -Fund activity and balances in FY

2020-2021 reported in Attachment C.

5(d)(iii) Stanford Barn

Connection

SUMC budgets up to

$700K for connections in the

vicinity of barn

SUMC constructed the Stanford Barn

Connection prior to the issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit (LPCH) to serve

Yes, complies.

5.b

Packet Pg. 165



the linkage goal and facilities are fully operational.

Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing

5(e)

Infrastructure, Sustainable

Neighborhoods and

Communities, and Affordable Housing Fund

$23.2M payment for these uses

First of three $7,733,333 payments made on

August 19, 2011. Second payment of $7,733,333 made on December 5, 2012. The third and final payment of $7,733,333 made on December 12, 2017, which was within 30

days from issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy Permit (LPCH).

Yes, complies. -Fund activity and balances in FY


The City expended affordable housing funds on the Stevenson House

project in FY 2013 and the remaining affordable

housing funds were fully exhausted in FY 2020 to

support the Wilton Court Housing Project. The

SUMC contribution to affordable housing is now exhausted in accordance

with Section 5(e)(ii). There were expenditures from

this fund during the reporting period FY 2020-

2021.

Climate Change

5(f)

Climate Change – Sustainability

Programs Benefit Fund

$12M payment for climate change-

related projects and programs

First of three $4M payments made on

August 19, 2011. Second payment of $4M made on December 5, 2012. The third and

Yes, complies -Fund activity and balances in FY


5.b

Packet Pg. 166



final payment of $4M made on December 12, 2017, which was within 30 days from issuance of the first Hospital Occupancy

Permit (LPCH).

5.b

Packet Pg. 167

Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Annual Report Supplement

Prepared by the City of Palo Alto

January 24, 2022

Background and Purpose

On June 6, 2011, the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan amendments, zoning changes, a

conditional use permit, annexation and design applications for the Stanford University Medical Center

Facilities Renewal and Replacement Project (the “Projects”). The Projects include the construction of a

new Stanford Hospital and clinics buildings, an expansion of the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital,

construction of new School of Medicine buildings, renovation of the existing Hoover Pavilion,

construction of a new medical office building and parking garage at Hoover Pavilion, roadway

improvements along Welch Road and Durand Way, and SUMC design guidelines. A Development

Agreement (the “Agreement”) vesting these approvals was entered into between the SUMC Parties and

the City and was effective on June 6, 2011 and continues for thirty (30) years from the effective date.

The Agreement requires an annual report, prepared by SUMC that outlines the activities of the

preceding year and the efforts to fulfill the obligations of the Agreement.

Per the requirements of sections 12(a) and 12(c) of the Agreement, The City of Palo Alto is to prepare a

supplement to the annual report that contains an accounting of the funds described in the Section 5 of

the Agreement (“SUMC Parties’ Promises”) including the fund balances and expenditures and the

purposes for which the expenditures were used.

Public Benefit Fund Accounting

This annual report supplement covers the period during the tenth year of the Agreement: June 6, 2020

through June 6, 2021. Accounting for the funds outlined in Attachment C-3 Part 2 extends through the

end of the City’s Fiscal Year 2021, June 30, 2021.

In summary, the SUMC Parties have paid approximately $44.3 million in public benefit fees to the City

since June 6, 2011 through the FY 2019-2020 reporting period. There were no required new payments

from the SUMC Parties during the FY 2020-2021 reporting period.

Attachment C – Part 1

5.c

Packet Pg. 168

The first payment of $20,800,333 on August 11, 2011 was for the following funds:

• Fund for Community Health and Safety, Project Safety Net (Section 5(a)(iii));

• Fund for Expansion Cost Mitigation (Section 5(b)(iii));

• Fund for Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections from Intermodal Transit Center to El Camino

Real/Quarry Road Intersection (Section 5(d)(i));

• Fund for Public Right of Way Improvements to Enhance Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections on

Quarry Road (Section 5(d)(ii));

• Fund for Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities and Affordable Housing

(Section 5(e)), and

• Fund for Climate Change - Sustainable Programs Benefit (Section 5(f)(i)).

The second payment of $11,733,333 payment on December 5, 2012 was for the following funds:

• Fund for Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities and Affordable Housing (Section 5(e)) and

• Fund for Climate Change - Sustainable Programs Benefit (Section 5(f)(i)).

The third payment and final payment of $11,744,533 on December 12, 2017 was for the following funds:

• Fund for Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities and Affordable Housing

(Section 5(e));

• Fund for Climate Change -Sustainable Programs Benefit (Section 5(f)(i)); and

• Fund for Community Health and Safety, Project Safety Net (Section 5(a)(iii)).

The specific funding accounts in Attachment C Part 2 are consistent with Section 5 of the Agreement.

These funds have been assigned a unique cost center number for accounting purposes. Attachment C

Part 2 also contains the investment earnings and the earnings allocation to the various cost centers.

Public Benefit Fund Expenditures

Expenditures and other activity occurred in the following funds in Fiscal Year 2020-2021 through June

30, 2021:

• $1,150,000 under “Expansion Cost Mitigation” for Rail Grade Separation (PL-17001), University Avenue Streetscape Upgrade (PE-21004), and Building Systems Improvements (PF-01003).

• $800,000 under “Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing” for New Public Safety Building (PE-15001).

The Infrastructure, Sustainable Neighborhoods and Communities, and Affordable Housing Fund contained an original contribution of $1,720,488 for support of affordable housing. SUMC funding supported the Stevenson House project in FY 2013 and the remaining affordable housing funds were fully exhausted in FY 2020 to support the Wilton Court Housing Project.

5.c

Packet Pg. 169

5.c

Packet Pg. 170

Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Annual Reports

Prior Fiscal Year Annual Reports:

• Fiscal Year 2011-2012 http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/31976

• Fiscal Year 2012-2013 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/39991



• Fiscal Year 2015-2016 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/60896

• Fiscal Year 2016-2017 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=49142.31&BlobID=65285

• Fiscal Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2021/11-november/20211101pccs-amended.pdf

5.d

Packet Pg. 171

http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/31976





https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=49142.31&BlobID=65285

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=49142.31&BlobID=65285






Title: Approval of Task Order Construction Contract C22183580 With MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. in the Amount not to exceed $8,815,809 for Trenching and Substructure Installation and Materials; Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related but Unforeseen Change Orders Not-to-Exceed $881,581, for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $9,697,390 Over Three Years

From: City Manager

Lead Department: Utilities Recommendation Staff recommends the Council:

1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute a task order construction contract with MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. (Linked Document) in the amount not to exceed $8,215,809 to provide utility trenching and substructure installation, labor and equipment for a period of 3 years.

2. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to purchase materials in the

amount of $600,000 related to the utility trenching and substructure installation to be performed by MP Nexlevel of California, Inc.

3. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to negotiate and execute

change orders to the contract with MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. for related, but unforeseen work which may develop during the contract term, the total value of which shall not exceed $881,581 or 10% of total contract. The total not-to-exceed amount of the contract is $9,697,390, which includes contract amount of $8,215,809, materials of $600,000, and a 10% contingency of $881,581 over 3 years.

Background Electric substructure installation and trenching services are contracted out and the volume of substructure and trenching services varies year over year based on the level of construction and

6

Packet Pg. 172

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/attachments/03-21-22-id-13953-c22183580.pdf


development activities in the City. Staff establishes a multi-year contract with a general contractor to provide trenching and excavation services, and to install electric utility substructures such as conduits, boxes, and vaults on an as needed basis. The trenching and substructures are for a variety of customer service installations, replacement of existing underground electric system equipment, and for fiber optic, streetlight, and communication services. Staff creates a scope of work each time the contractor’s services are needed, and the contractor provides a ‘not to exceed’ quote. Staff must authorize the work prior to the start of construction. Payment is made upon completion of the work, and acceptance by the City, and is only for the contractor’s actual costs. For customer-related work, trenching and substructure costs are reimbursed by the customers through the customer connection charges. These costs do not contribute to general electric ratepayer expenses. Project completion retention is not held for these projects as they have a limited scope of work and construction duration and tracking, and billing would pose an administrative challenge. The existing three-year trenching and substructure contract with MP Nexlevel is scheduled to end in March 2022. Discussion The City does not possess the staffing resources to provide electric substructure installation and trenching services. Electric substructure and trenching services have been contracted out by the City for over 28 years. Award of the contract is necessary to complete electric and fiber optic capital improvement projects in a timely and cost-effective manner. These services are also occasionally used for maintenance work included in the Operating Budget. Summary of Bid Process

Bid Name/Number 2022-2025 Utility Trench & Substructure

Installation/IFB 183580

Proposed Length of Project 3 years

Number of Bids Emailed to Contractors 26

Number of Bids Emailed to Builder’s Exchanges 402

Total Days to Respond to Bid 19

Pre-Bid Meeting? Yes

Number of Company Attendees at Pre-Bid Meeting 4

Number of Bids Received: 3

Bid Price Range $8,215,809 to $10,717,695

*Bid summary provided in Attachment A. Staff has reviewed all bids submitted and recommends that the bid of $8,215,809 submitted by MP Nexlevel of California, Inc. (MP Nexlevel) be accepted and that MP Nexlevel be declared the lowest responsible bidder. The bid is 3% below the staff engineer's estimate of $8,500,000. Staff’s estimate was based on the previous contract for this work adjusted for added quantities and estimated labor escalation. For example, staff changed the scope of the contract to reflect actual construction activities performed under the most recent contract such as increasing or

6

Packet Pg. 173

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/attachments/03-21-2022-id-13953-attachment-a.pdf


decreasing number of hours for a skilled worker (i.e. foreman, equipment operator, truck driver) and types of equipment (i.e. dump truck, directional boring rig). Though the cost of equipment provided by MP Nexlevel was less than the previous bid, labor costs increased by 18% due to high demand for construction workers and increasing market wages, thus resulting in the 3% difference between the staff estimate and bid. The Bids were for labor and equipment costs only. Materials were not included as a bid item since they will be supplied by either the City or the Contractor, depending on the type of material required. The estimated cost of contractor supplied materials is $600,000. The full contract amount requested is $8,215,809, which is MP Nexlevel’s bid price for labor and equipment, plus $600,000 for materials. Staff confirmed with the Contractor's State License Board that the contractor has an active license on file. Staff checked references supplied by the contractor for previous work performed and found no significant complaints. The work by the contractor will be continually monitored and evaluated. Continued work under this contract for subsequent fiscal years FY2023 and FY2024 will be subject to satisfactory performance by the contractor and appropriation of required funds in the respective fiscal years. Stakeholder Engagement This was completed as a public request for proposals and coordinated with internal stakeholders including the procurement division and legal reviews. Resource Impact Funding for FY 2022 activities within contract year one is available in the FY 2022 Adopted Capital Budgets of the Electric and Fiber Funds via the following projects: Electric Customer Connections (EL-89028); Electric System Improvement (EL-98003,); Foothills Rebuild (EL-21001); Fiber Optic Customer Connections (FO-10000) and Fiber Optic System Improvement (FO-10001). The cost allocation will be based on actual CIP construction work for the Electric and Fiber fund over the next three years. Staff is requesting approval of the full 10% contingency amount of $881,581 in the first year of the contract to cover any unforeseen conditions and prevent delays of CIP work. Funding for FY 2023 and FY 2024 is subject to City Council approval of the annual appropriation of funds through the annual budget process. This contract is on the City’s task order construction contract template, which permits the City to terminate without cause/for convenience by providing written notice to the contractor. In the event the City finds itself facing a challenging budget situation, and it is determined that City resources need to be refocused elsewhere, the City can terminate for convenience. Other options include termination due to non-appropriation of funds or amending the contract to reduce the cost, for example, by reducing the scope of work.

6

Packet Pg. 174


Staff is advancing this recommendation as reflected in the City’s adopted budget. Should the City Council wish to defer this project considering other priorities, this item may be removed from the Consent Calendar. Staff will then return to Council with this and other projects for reconsideration. Contract Distribution by Fiscal Year

Description

Year 1 March 2022 –

Feb 2023 FY22 - FY23


Feb 2024 FY23 - FY24


Feb 2025 FY24 – FY25 Total

Labor and Equipment $2,631,923 $2,737,199 $2,846,687 $8,215,809

Materials $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $600,000

Contingency $881,581 $881,581

Total $3,713,503 $2,937,199 $3,046,687 $9,697,390

Policy Implications The approval of this contract is consistent with existing City policies including the Council-approved Utilities Strategic Plan-Strategic Objectives: Priority 4 to manage finances optimally & use resources efficiently, and specifically Strategy 4, Action 2 to balance customer rates and service with infrastructure improvements and maintenance. Environmental Review This project is categorically exempt from the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) under California Code of Regulations sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction), since the contracted services affect existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity. Attachments:

• Attachment6.a: Attachment A: Bid Summary

6

Packet Pg. 175

Vendor: Vendor: Vendor:Bid Item Hours Description Per Hour TOTAL Bid Item Hours Description Per Hour TOTAL Bid Item Hours Description Per Hour TOTAL

1 3000 Foreman $ 130.00 390,000.00$ 1 3000 Foreman $ 137.23 411,690.00$ 1 3000 Foreman $ 162.00 486,000.00$ 2 8000 Laborer $ 100.00 800,000.00$ 2 8000 Laborer $ 86.40 691,200.00$ 2 8000 Laborer $ 118.50 948,000.00$ 3 300 Equipment Operator $ 130.00 39,000.00$ 3 300 Equipment Operator $ 105.34 31,602.00$ 3 300 Equipment Operator $ 159.50 47,850.00$ 4 300 Truck Driver Class A $ 110.00 33,000.00$ 4 300 Truck Driver Class A $ 124.63 37,389.00$ 4 300 Truck Driver Class A $ 106.00 31,800.00$ 5 50 Qualified journeyman worker to

perform conduit intercepts in an energized duct bank

$ 130.00 6,500.00$ 5 50 Qualified journeyman worker to perform conduit intercepts in an energized duct bank

$ 235.00 11,750.00$ 5 50 Qualified journeyman worker to perform conduit intercepts in an energized duct bank

$ 150.00 7,500.00$

6 300 Concrete Finisher $ 100.00 30,000.00$ 6 300 Concrete Finisher $ 86.40 25,920.00$ 6 300 Concrete Finisher $ 113.00 33,900.00$ 7 50 Core Driller with operator $ 150.00 7,500.00$ 7 50 Core Driller with operator $ 199.63 9,981.50$ 7 50 Core Driller with operator $ 111.50 5,575.00$ 8 50 Concrete Saw with operator $ 250.00 12,500.00$ 8 50 Concrete Saw with operator $ 199.63 9,981.50$ 8 50 Concrete Saw with operator $ 102.00 5,100.00$ 9 3000 Foreman’s Truck $ 25.00 75,000.00$ 9 3000 Foreman’s Truck $ 18.36 55,080.00$ 9 3000 Foreman’s Truck $ 16.40 49,200.00$ 10 3000 Crew truck, with Hand Tools, and Gas‐

Powered Cutoff Saw $ 40.00 120,000.00$ 10 3000 Crew truck, with Hand Tools, and Gas‐Powered

Cutoff Saw $ 29.24 87,720.00$ 10 3000 Crew truck, with Hand Tools, and

Gas‐Powered Cutoff Saw $ 24.60 73,800.00$

11 100 Compressor and Jackhammer $ 30.00 3,000.00$ 11 100 Compressor and Jackhammer $ 16.19 1,619.00$ 11 100 Compressor and Jackhammer $ 15.10 1,510.00$ 12 500 Backhoe $ 80.00 40,000.00$ 12 500 Backhoe $ 46.78 23,390.00$ 12 500 Backhoe $ 27.70 13,850.00$ 13 150 Ramhoe $ 120.00 18,000.00$ 13 150 Ramhoe $ 56.67 8,500.50$ 13 150 Ramhoe $ 37.80 5,670.00$ 14 2000 Bobtail Truck $ 60.00 120,000.00$ 14 2000 Bobtail Truck $ 40.22 80,440.00$ 14 2000 Bobtail Truck $ 64.20 128,400.00$ 15 2500 End‐Dump Truck $ 110.00 275,000.00$ 15 2500 End‐Dump Truck $ 49.72 124,300.00$ 15 2500 End‐Dump Truck $ 69.30 173,250.00$ 16 800 10‐wheel Dump Truck $ 110.00 88,000.00$ 16 800 10‐wheel Dump Truck $ 42.22 33,776.00$ 16 800 10‐wheel Dump Truck $ 31.50 25,200.00$ 17 50 Boom Truck with Flatbed $ 130.00 6,500.00$ 17 50 Boom Truck with Flatbed $ 79.80 3,990.00$ 17 50 Boom Truck with Flatbed $ 50.40 2,520.00$ 18 100 Directional Boring Rig $ 600.00 60,000.00$ 18 100 Directional Boring Rig $ 900.00 90,000.00$ 18 100 Directional Boring Rig $ 70.50 7,050.00$ 19 50 Arrow Board $ 30.00 1,500.00$ 19 50 Arrow Board $ 18.18 909.00$ 19 50 Arrow Board $ 5.05 252.50$ 20 800 Vac Trailer – 800 Gallons $ 120.00 96,000.00$ 20 800 Vac Trailer – 800 Gallons $ 39.18 31,344.00$ 20 800 Vac Trailer – 800 Gallons $ 25.20 20,160.00$ 21 2500 Mini Excavator $ 80.00 200,000.00$ 21 2500 Mini Excavator $ 46.78 116,950.00$ 21 2500 Mini Excavator $ 17.60 44,000.00$ 22 100 Bobcat Skid‐Steer $ 70.00 7,000.00$ 22 100 Bobcat Skid‐Steer $ 38.26 3,826.00$ 22 100 Bobcat Skid‐Steer $ 20.20 2,020.00$ 23 3000 Equipment Trailer $ 30.00 90,000.00$ 23 3000 Equipment Trailer $ 14.40 43,200.00$ 23 3000 Equipment Trailer $ 3.80 11,400.00$ 24 100 A/C Roller $ 30.00 3,000.00$ 24 100 A/C Roller $ 32.09 3,209.00$ 24 100 A/C Roller $ 16.40 1,640.00$ 25 100 Estimator $ 150.00 15,000.00$ 25 100 Estimator $ 111.82 11,182.00$ 25 100 Estimator $ 107.00 10,700.00$ 26 100 3‐5 Yard Dump Truck $ 60.00 6,000.00$ 26 100 3‐5 Yard Dump Truck $ 40.22 4,022.00$ 26 100 3‐5 Yard Dump Truck $ 27.70 2,770.00$ 27 0 NON‐BID‐ITEM Traffic Control Plan $ ‐ ‐$ 27 0 NON‐BID‐ITEM Traffic Control Plan (Cost +) $ ‐ ‐$ 27 0 NON‐BID‐ITEM Traffic Control Plan $ ‐ ‐$ 28 0 Traffic Control Per Day (Sub‐ $ ‐ ‐$ 28 0 Traffic Control Per Day (Sub‐Contracted Cost +) $ ‐ ‐$ 28 0 Traffic Control Per Day (Sub‐ $ ‐ ‐$ 29 100 Box Shoring $ 50.00 5,000.00$ 29 100 Box Shoring $ 1,150.00 115,000.00$ 29 100 Box Shoring $ 31.50 3,150.00$ 30 100 Message Board $ 50.00 5,000.00$ 30 100 Message Board $ 24.25 2,425.00$ 30 100 Message Board $ 25.80 2,580.00$ 31 10 Pipe Fusing (100') $ 250.00 2,500.00$ 31 10 Pipe Fusing (100') $ 4,200.00 42,000.00$ 31 10 Pipe Fusing (100') $ 1,020.00 10,200.00$ 32 50 Pipe Grouting $ 850.00 42,500.00$ 32 50 Pipe Grouting $ 200.00 10,000.00$ 32 50 Pipe Grouting $ 1,590.00 79,500.00$ 33 750 2200 Gallon Vacuum Truck $ 160.00 120,000.00$ 33 750 2200 Gallon Vacuum Truck $ 265.78 199,335.00$ 33 750 2200 Gallon Vacuum Truck $ 378.50 283,875.00$ 34 1000 Large Bore Rig $ 750.00 750,000.00$ 34 1000 Large Bore Rig $ 900.00 900,000.00$ 34 1000 Large Bore Rig $ 113.50 113,500.00$

3,467,500.00$ 3,221,731.50$ 2,631,922.50$

Section C3,467,500.00$ 3,221,731.50$ 2,631,922.50$ 3,571,525.00$ 3,318,382.93$ 2,737,199.40$ 3,678,670.75$ 3,417,934.42$ 2,846,687.38$

10,717,695.75$ 9,958,048.85$ 8,215,809.28$

TOTAL YEAR ONETOTAL YEAR TWO

TOTAL YEAR THREE

GRAND TOTAL FOR YEAR 1,2 AND 3


TOTAL YEAR THREE



TOTAL YEAR THREE


TOTAL GRAND TOTAL GRAND TOTAL

Casey Construction, Inc. Hot Line Construction, Inc. MP Nexlevel

6.a

Packet Pg. 176




Title: Approval of Construction Contract C22184073 with O'Grady Paving Inc. in the Amount of $1,200,234, and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders for Related Additional but Unforeseen Work that May Develop During the Project Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $118,523, for the Fiscal Year 2022 Asphalt Paving, Capital Improvements Program Projects PE-86070, PO-12001, PL-04010 and PO-89003

From: City Manager

Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that Council:

1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute a construction contract with O’Grady Paving Inc. (Contract No. C22184073) in an amount not to exceed $1,200,234 for Palo Alto Fiscal Year 2022 Street Resurfacing Project (Capital Improvement Program Projects PE-86070, PO-12001, PO-89003, PL-04010); and

2. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to negotiate and execute related change orders to the contract with O’Grady Paving Inc. for related additional but unforeseen work that may develop during the project, the total value of which shall not exceed $118,523.

Background The Public Works Engineering Services Division manages construction contracts for concrete repair, preventive maintenance, resurfacing, and reconstruction of various City streets annually. In more recent years, additional Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects are being built through annualized resurfacing contracts due to the complexity of construction and benefit of being included in a larger project. The candidate streets are surveyed biennially by Public Works Engineering staff and rated by a computerized pavement maintenance management system (PMMS) and by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) pavement analysis program.

Discussion

Project Description

7

Packet Pg. 177

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/public-works/engineering-services/cip-contracts/c22184073-ogrady-paving-cc_minutetraq.pdf


Staff recommends approval of this street resurfacing construction contract with O’Grady Paving Inc. as part of the program to maintain and improve the condition of Palo Alto’s streets. This project will carry out necessary maintenance work that is in alignment with the Adopted Fiscal Year 2022 Capital Improvement Program budget strategy. The $1,200,234 expenditure for this contract will be used to repave 2.63 lane-miles of arterial and residential streets with Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scores averaging 46. This will help maintain and improve the City’s PCI beyond its average of 83 and will address many streets whose PCI scores fall below the City’s minimum goal of 60.

The scope of work includes the replacement of approximately 850 linear feet (0.16 miles) of curbs and gutters, 1,350 square feet of driveways, and 1,250 square feet of sidewalks. Additionally, three new curb ramps will be installed, and eight existing curb ramps will be retrofitted with truncated domes to conform to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The streets being resurfaced in this contract are shown in Attachment A.

Bid Process On January 26, 2022, an invitation for bids (IFB) for the Palo Alto FY 2022 Street Resurfacing Project was posted online through PlanetBids and 1,665 notifications were sent to general contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and builder’s exchanges through the City’s eProcurement system. The bidding period was 21 calendar days. Bids were received from five contractors on February 16, 2022, as listed on the attached Bid Summary (Attachment B).

Summary of Bid Process

Bid Name/Number Palo Alto FY 2022 Street Resurfacing

Project IFB #184073

Proposed Length of Project 120 calendar days

Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Builder’s Exchanges

22

Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Contractors 14

Total Days to Respond to Bid 21

Pre-Bid Meeting? No Number of Bids Received: 5

Bid Price Range $1,200,234 - $1,887,570

Bids ranged from $1,200,234 to $1,887,570 and from 4% below to 52% above the engineer’s estimate of $1,244,290. Staff has reviewed the bids submitted and recommends the base bid and bid alternate 1 amount of $1,200,234 submitted by O’Grady Paving Inc., be accepted, and that O’Grady Paving Inc. be declared the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The construction contingency amount of $118,523, which equals approximately 10 percent of the contract value, is requested for related, additional, but unforeseen work which may develop during the project, implemented via City-approved Change Order.

7

Packet Pg. 178


Staff reviewed information and similar projects performed by the lowest bidder, O’Grady Paving Inc. and found them to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Staff also checked with the Contractor's State License Board and confirmed the contractor has an active license on file.

This contract is on the City’s construction contract template, which permits the City to terminate without cause/for convenience by providing written notice to the contractor. In the event the City finds itself facing a challenging budget situation, and it is determined that City resources need to be refocused elsewhere, the City can terminate for convenience. Other options include termination due to non-appropriation of funds or amending the contract to reduce the cost, for example, by reducing the scope of work.

Resource Impact Funding for this contract is available in the Fiscal Year 2022 budgets for the following Capital Improvement Program projects: Street Maintenance (PE-86070), Curb and Gutter Repairs (PO-12001), Sidewalk Repairs (PO-89003), and Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (PL-04010). The not-to-exceed funding allocations are as follows:

Stakeholder Engagement All streets have been coordinated with the City’s Utilities Department and the Office of Transportation to minimize the cutting of newly resurfaced streets. Extensive public outreach will be conducted before and during the construction phase to keep the community informed throughout the process, including flyers sent to adjacent residences and businesses, and notices posted online on Nextdoor and the City’s website.

Policy Implications This project is in conformance with the City of Palo Alto’s Comprehensive Plan and does not represent any changes to existing City policies.

CIP Project Funding Source Contract Contingency Total Encumbrance

PE-86070 $872,311 $87,231 $959,542

PO-12001 $90,900 $9,090 $99,990

PL-04010 $15,000 $0 $15,000

PO-89003 $222,023 $22,202 $244,225

Total $1,200,234 $118,523 $1,318,757

7

Packet Pg. 179


Environmental Review Street resurfacing projects are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301c of the CEQA Guidelines as repair, maintenance and/or minor alteration of the existing facilities and no further environmental review is necessary. Attachments:

• Attachment7.a: Attachment A - Street List and Map

• Attachment7.b: Attachment B - Bid Summary

7

Packet Pg. 180

ATTACHMENT A

STREET LIST

Street From Street To Street PCI

Bryant Street Hamilton Avenue Forest Avenue 49

Cambridge Avenue Yale Street El Camino Real 50

Churchill Avenue Bryant Street Waverley Street 48Churchill Avenue Waverley Street Cowper Street 53

Oregon Avenue Greer Road End 38

Oregon Avenue Ross Road Louis Road 43

Add Alt #1

Oxford Street Ash Street Birch Street 53Average PCI: 48

FY 2022 Overlay (July 2021 ‐ June 2022)

7.a

Packet Pg. 181

AL

HIGH STREET

RAMONA STREET

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

RAMO

EMER

HIGH S

E

EMERSON STREETEMERSON STREET

HO

ME

R A

VE

NU

E

BRYANT STREET

PALO

ALT

O A

VEN

UE

PAL

O A

LTO

AV

ENU

E

HA

WT

HO

RN

E A

VE

NU

E

EMERSON STREET

RAMONA STREET

EMERSON STREET

HA

WT

HO

RN

E A

VE

NU

E

HIGH STREET

EV

ER

ET

T A

VE

NU

EE

VE

RE

TT

AV

EN

UE HIGH STREET

ALMA STREET ALMA STREET ALMA STREET

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

EMERSON STREET

RAMONA STREET

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

UN

IVE

RSI

TY

AV

EN

UE

RAMONA STREET

BRYANT STREET

HIGH STREET

EMERSON STREET

ALMA STREET

EMERSON STREET

HIGH STREET HIGH STREET

HA

MIL

TO

N A

VE

NU

EH

AM

ILT

ON

AV

EN

UE

EMERSON STREET

HA

MIL

TO

N A

VE

NU

E GILMAN STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

BRYANT STREET FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET

RAMONA STREET RAMONA STREET

BRYANT STREET

FLORENCE STREET

KIPLING STREET

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREETWAVERLEY STREET

EV

ER

ET

T A

VE

NU

EE

VE

RE

TT

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

HA

WT

HO

RN

E A

VE

NU

E

RAMONA STREET

BRYANT STREET

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

UN

IVE

RSI

TY

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

KIPLING STREET

UN

IVE

RSI

TY

AV

EN

UE

UN

IVE

RSI

TY

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

HA

MIL

TO

N A

VE

NU

E

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

RU

TH

VE

N A

VE

NU

E

POE

ST

RE

ET

VENUE

OWPER STREET

TASSO STREET

RU

TH

VE

N A

VE

NU

E

WEBSTER STREET

BYRON STREET

HA

WT

HO

RN

E A

VE

NU

E

COWPER STREET COWPER STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

HA

WT

HO

RN

E A

VE

NU

EH

AW

TH

OR

NE

AV

EN

UE

KIPLING STREET

EV

ER

ET

T A

VE

NU

ECOWPER STREET

WEBSTER STREET

BYRON STREET

E

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

EV

ER

ET

T A

VE

NU

E

WEBSTER STREET WEBSTER STREET

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

BYRON STREET

TASSO STREET

BRYAN

SCOTT STREET

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET BRYANT STREET

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

HA

MIL

TO

N A

VE

NU

E

COWPER STREET

FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREET

BRYANT STREET

HO

ME

R A

VE

NU

E

WAVERLEY STREET

CH

AN

NIN

G A

VE

NU

E

RAMONA STREET RAMONA STREET

WEBSTER STREET WEBSTER STREET

COWPER STREET

HO

ME

R A

VE

NU

EH

OM

ER

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

KIPLING STREET

CH

AN

NIN

G A

VE

NU

E

WAVERLEY STREET

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

UN

IVE

RSI

TY

AV

EN

UE

BYRON STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROADMIDDLEFIELD ROAD

LY

TT

ON

AV

EN

UE

WEBSTER STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

HA

MH

AM

ILT

ON

AV

EN

UE

FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLWAVERLEY STREET

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

COW

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

WEBSTER STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

CH

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

WEBSTER STREET

FOR

E

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

HO

ME

R A

VE

NU

E

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

WEBSTER STREET

CH

AN

NIN

G A

VE

NU

EC

HA

NN

ING

AV

EN

UE

BYRON S

WEBSTE

LIN

CO

LN

AV

EN

UE

MIDDLEFMIDDLEFIELD ROAD

COWPER STREET

EV

ER

ET

T C

OU

RT

LANE 39

LANE B EASTLANE 7 EASTLANE 5 EAST LANE 6 EAST

LA

NE

20

EA

STL

AN

E 3

0L

AN

E 2

0 W

EST

LA

NE

21

LA

NE

33

LANE 15 EAST

BR

YA

NT

CO

UR

T

PAU

LSE

N L

AN

E

LANE 12 WEST LANE 11 WEST

CENTENNIAL WALK LANE D EAST

LANE D WEST

LANE 5

DOWNING LANE

LANE 56

PA

PALO A

LTOA

VEN

UE

ALO ALTO AVENUE

PA

LO

AL

TO A

VEN

UE

EMERSON STREET EMERSON STREET

HIGH STREET HIGH STREET HIGH STREET

ALMA STREET ALMA STREET ALMA STREET ALMA STREET ALMA STREET

FOR

EST

AV

EN

UE

CH

AN

NIN

G A

VE

NU

E

HO

ME

R A

VE

NU

E

AD

DIS

ON

AV

EN

UE

LANE 7 WEST LANE 8 WEST LANE A WEST LANE B WEST

CH

AN

NIN

G A

VE

NU

E

This map is a product of theCity of Palo Alto GIS

This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources.

0' 351'

CIT

Y

OF PALO

ALTOIN

CO R P O R A

T

ED

CAL I FORN I A

P a l o A l t oT h e C i t y o f

AP

RI

L1 6

18

94

The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors. ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Altotbotkin, 2021-11-03 08:16:27 (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Meta\View.mdb)

FY20

22 O

verla

y

7.a

Packet Pg. 182

tbotkin

Polygon

ALMA STREET ALMA STREET

E

ALMA STREET

EMERSON STREET

CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

EMERSON STREET

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

EMERSON STREET

TE

NN

YSO

N A

VE

NU

E

ALMA STREET

CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET

ALMA STREET

TE

NN

YSO

N A

VE

NU

ET

EN

NY

SON

AV

EN

UE


EMERSON STREET

SEA

LE

AV

EN

UE

SEA

LE

AV

EN

UE

EMERSON STREET

RIN

CO

NA

DA

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

SEA

LE

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

RIN

CO

NA

DA

AV

EN

UE

EMERSON STREET

SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

ESA

NT

A R

ITA

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

HIGH STREET H

EMERSON STREET

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREET

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREET

TE

NN

YSO

N A

VE

NU

E

COWPER STREET

SEA

LE

AV

EN

UE

SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

E

COWPER STREET

SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

E

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREET

WA

VE

RL

EY

OA

KS

(PV

T)

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

AV

EN

UE

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREET

SEA

LE

AV

EN

UE

WEBSTER STREET

TASSO STREET

SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

E

BYRON STREET

COWPER STREET

NO

RT

H C

AL

IFO

RN

IA A

VE

NU

E

WEBSTER STREET

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

AV

EN

UE

SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

E

BYRON STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

KIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREETALMA STREET

RAMONA STREET

EMERSON STREET

HIGH STREET

EMBA

RCADERO

RO

AD

ME

LV

ILL

E A

VE

NU

E

EMERSON STREET

KE

LL

OG

G A

VE

NU

E

EMERSON STREET

KE

LL

OG

G A

VE

NU

E

CH

UR

CH

ILL

AV

EN

UE

CH

UR

CH

ILL

AV

EN

UE


CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

CH

UR

CH

ILL

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREETC

HU

RC

HIL

L A

VE

NU

EC

HU

RC

HIL

L A

VE

NU

EWAVERLEY STREET

KE

LL

OG

G A

VE

NU

E

BRYANT STREET

EMBA

RCADERO R

OAD

EMBA

RCADERO

RO

AD

WAVERLEY STREET

ME

LV

ILL

E A

VE

NU

E

EMBA

RCADERO

RO

AD

EMERSON STREET

KIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

BRYANT STREETBRYANT STREET

COWPER STREET

WEBSTER STREETWEBSTER STREET

KE

LL

OG

G A

VE

NU

E

TASSO STREET

EMBA

RCADERO

ROAD

TASSO STREET

ME

LV

ILL

E A

VE

NU

EM

EL

VIL

LE

AV

EN

UE

WAVERLEY STREET

COWPER STREETCOWPER STREET

KIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

KIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

KE

LL

OG

G A

VE

NU

EMIDDLEFIELD ROAD

BYRON STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

ME

LV

ILL

KIN

GSL

ME

LV

I LL

E A

VE

NU

E

WEBSTER STREETKIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

KIN

GSL

EY

AV

EN

UE

BYRON STREETBYRON STREET

WEBSTER STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

POR

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

SEA

LSE

AL

E

AV

EN

UE

WEBSTER STREETWEBSTER STREET

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

TE

NN

TE

NN

YSO

N A

VE

NU

E

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

UE

COWPER STREET

WEBSTER STREETWEBSTER STREETEMBA

RCADERO

RO

AD

MIDDLEFIELD ROAD

EMBA

RCADERO

R

BYRON STREET

COWPER STREET

WAVERLEY STREET

AV

EN

UE

LANE 59 EAST

WH

ITM

AN

CO

UR

T

TE

NN

YSO

N A

VE

NU

E

CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET



0' 351'

CIT

Y

OF PALO

ALTOIN

CO R P O R A

T

ED

CAL I FORN I A


AP

RI

L1 6

18

94


FY20

22 O

verla

y

7.a

Packet Pg. 183

tbotkin

Polygon

SAVENU

E

UE

MIDDLEFIELD RO

AD

MO

RENO

AVENU

E

MO

RENO

AVEN

UE

MA

RIO

N A

VEN

UE

CO

ASTL

AN

D D

RIV

E

MIDDLEFIELD RO

ADW

EBSTER STREET

BRYSON AVENUE

COLORADO AVENUE

BYRON STREET

COLORADO AVENUE

COW

PER STREET

DO

AVENU

E

C

WAY

TOW

LE W

AY

MID

MIDDLEFIELD RO

AD

LAYN

E C

OU

RT LO

MA V

ERDE AVENUE

ROSS RO

AD

RO

SS C

OUR

T

RIC

HA

RD

SO

N C

OU

RT

AM

ES A

VEN

UE

AM

ES C

OURT

L

LOUIS RO

AD

RO

SE

WO

OD

DR

IVE

ROSS ROAD

MIDDLEFIELD RO

AD

SU

TTE

R A

VENU

E

STE

RN A

VENU

E

PRICE COURT

ELLSW

OR

TH

PLA

CE (PVT)

COLORADO AVENUE

SU

TTER

AVENU

E

ROSS RO

AD

CLARA DRIVE

COLORADO AVENUE

MARSHALL DRIV

E

ROSS RO

AD

RANDERS COURT

ALL

EN

CO

UR

T

ROSS RO

AD

MANCHESTER CO

URT

LOM

A VERDE A

VENUE

LOUIS RO

AD

LOUIS RO

AD

LOM

A VERDE A

VENUE

LOUIS RO

AD

KENNETH DRIV

E

KEN

NETH

DRIV

E

STOCKTO

N PLACEVERNO

N TERRACE

THOM

AS D

RIV

E

JAN

ICE W

AY

GR

EE

R R

OA

D

KENNETH DRIV

E

WES

KE

NN

ET

H D

RIV

E

STOCKTO

N PLACE

MO

RRIS DRIVE

GREER RO

AD

MADDUX D

RIVE

MO

RRIS DRIVE

STOCKTO

N PLACE

BAU

TIS

TA

CO

UR

T

GREER RO

AD

LOM

A VERDE A

VENUE

GREER RO

AD

LOM

A VERDE A

VENUE

KENNETH DRIV

EMORRIS

DRIV

E

BA

YSH

OR

E FR

EEW

AY

BA

YSH

OR

E FR

EEW

AY

E

TREET

KIPLING STREET

EY STR

MIDDLEFIELD RO

AD

OR

EG

ON E

XPR

ESSW

AY

UE

MA

RIO

N A

VEN

UE

RION PLACE

OR

EG

ON

AVEN

UERLAN

D D

RIV

E

GA

RLA

ND

DR

IVE

ROSS RO

AD

OREG

ON

AVENU

E

ROSS RO

AD

COASTLAND DRIVE

OR

EG

ON

EXPR

ESSW

AY

WARREN W

AY

LOUIS RO

AD

ELS

INO

RE D

RIV

E

EL CAJON W

AY

GAR

LAND D

RIV

E

MA

RSH

ALL

DRIV

E

MARSHALL DRIVE

MO

REN

O A

VEN

UE

ELSIN

OR IR

COUR

T

OR

EG

ON

EXPR

ESSW

AY

LOUIS RO

AD

WAR

REN

WAY

MO

RENO

AVEN

UE

MARSHALL DRIVE

LOUIS RO

AD

AGNES W

AY

DEN

NIS

DR

IVE

OR

EG

ON

AVEN

UE

BLAIR

C

BRUCE DRIV

E

FIE

LD

ING

DR

IVE

LOUIS RO

AD

AM

AR

ILLO

AVENU

E

SYCAMORE DRIV

E

CELI

A D

RIV

E

MO

REN

O A

VEN

UE

COLO

NIAL LANE

BURNHAM W

AY

GREER RO

AD

EA

ST B

AYSH

ORE R

OA

D

BA

YSH

OR

E F

REEW

AY

WEST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OA

D

MADDUX D

RIVE

EA

ST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OA

D

WEST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OA

DCOLORADO AVENUE

OTTERSO

N COURT

GEN

EVIEVE CO

URT

MADDUX D

RIVE

HIGG

INS PLACEGREER RO

ADCOLORADO A

VENUE

EA

ST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OA

D

BA

YSH

OR

E F

REEW

AY

WEST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OA

D

SIM

KIN

S C

OURT

WE

ST

BA

YS

HO

RE

RO

AD

OR

EG

DRIVE CA

R

GREER RO

AD

LAWRENCE L

ANE

COLORADO AVENUE CLARA DRIVESANDRA PLACE

SYCAMORE DRIV

E

LOUIS RO

AD

LOUIS RO

AD

COLORADO AVENUE

CLARA DRIV

E

CLA

RA D

RIVE

CLAR

A DRIV

E

DAVID AVENUECLA

RA D

RIV

E

WIN

TERGREEN W

AY

ROSS RO

AD

STE

LLIN

G D

RIV

E

NO

RTH

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AVENU

E

AM

AR

ILLO

AVEN

UE

GREER RO

AD

CO

LO

NIA

L L

AN

E

AM

AR

ILLO

AVEN

UE

VAN AUKEN CIRCLE

GREER RO

AD

AM

AR

ILLO

AVEN

MO

REN

O A

VEN

UE

ELMDALE PLACE

CL IFTON

EL CAJON W

AY

LOUIS RO

AD

MIDTO

WN CO

URT

SAN

CAR

LO

S C

OU

RT

TOW

LE PLACE

THOM

AS DRIV

E

EAST MEA

D

VER

NO

N T

ER

RA

CE

MADDUX D

RIVE

NLAND DRIVE

GASPAR CO

URT

EA

ST B

AYSH

ORE R

OA

D

WEST B

AYSH

OR

E R

OAD

BA

YSH

OR

E F

REEW

AY

BA

YSH

OR

E FR

EEW

AY

BA

YSH

OR

E FR

EEW

AY

BA

YSH

OR

E F

REEW

AY

PIE

RS C

OURT

STE

LLIN

G C

T

MO

RA

GA

CT

LOM

A VERDE PLACE

COASTLAND DR

IVE

ROSEWOOD DR IVE

MO

RENO AVENUE

METRO

CI R

CL

E

MOF F E T

TC

IR

C

LE

SUT T ER A

VEN

UE

EL

B

R

ID

GE

W

AY

MU

RR

A Y W

AY

D

AV

ID

AV

E

NU

E

S T E L L I

NG

D R

I V

E

GR

EE

R

RO

AD

GR

EE

R

RO

AD

Dav

id C

ourt

CO

LORADO

PLACE

SEVYSON CT

CT

COLORADO AVENUE

Fallen Leaf Street

Berryessa S

treet

Boronda L

ane

Tahoe Lane

Lake Avenue

Donner Lane

Almanor L

ane

FIELDING

CT

This map is a product of the

City of Palo Alto GIS


0' 495'

CIT

Y

OF PALO

ALTOIN

CO R P O R A

T

ED

CAL I FORN I A


AP

RI

L1 6

18

94

The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors. ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Alto

tbotkin, 2020-12-29 10:07:48

(\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Meta\View.mdb)

FY20

22 O

verla

y

7.a

Packet Pg. 184

tbotkin

Polygon

tbotkin

Polygon

142-

27-0

17

142-

27-0

18

142-2

7-01

9

142-

27-0

20

142-

27-0

21

142-

27-0

22

142-

27-0

23

142-

27- 0

24

142-

27-0

25

142-

27-0

2614

2-27

-028

142-

27-0

27

142-

27-0

30

142-

27-0

29

142-2

7-031

142-2

7-032

142-

27-0

33

142-

27-0

34

142-2

7-03

514

2-27

-036

142-

27-0

3714

2-27

-038

142-

27-0

39

142-

04-0

36

142-04

-036

142-04-024

CO

LL

EG

E A

VE

NU

E

CORNELL STREET

CO

LL

EG

E A

VE

NU

E

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

YALE STREETCA

MB

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

WILLIAMS STREET

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

GR

AN

T A

VE

NU

E

EL CAMINO REALEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL

SHE

RM

AN

AV

EN

UE

SHE

RM

AN

AV

EN

UE

JAC

AR

AN

DA

LA

NE

ASH STREET

NE

W M

AY

FIE

LD

LA

NE

NE

W M

AY

FIE

LD

LA

NE

EL CAMINO REALEL CAMINO REAL

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

PERAL LANE

MIMOSA LANE

SEDRO LANE

CA

MB

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

CO

LL

EG

E A

VE

NU

E

WELLESLEY STREET

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

MIL

L R

OA

D

ASH STREET

OX

FOR

D A

VE

NU

E

STA

NFO

RD

AV

EN

UE

CORNELL STREET

WELLESLEY STREET

EL CAMINO REAL

STA

NFO

RD

AV

EN

UE

CH

UR

CH

ILL

AV

EN

UE

MADRONO AVENUE

MA

NZ

AN

ITA

AV

EN

UE

PORTOLA AVENUE

MIR

AM

ON

TE A

VE

NU

E

PORTOLA AVENUE

EL CAMINO REAL

T ALMA STREET

CH

UR

CH

I LL

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

MARIPOSA AVENUE

CASTILLEJA AVENUE CASTILLEJA AVENUE

ESCOBITA AVENUEESCOBITA AVENUE

MIR

AM

ON

TE

AV

ENU

EM

IRA

MO

NTE

AV

EN

UE

SEQ

UO

IA A

VEN

UEMADRONO AVENUE

EL CAMINO REAL

PAR

K A

VE

NU

E

EL CAMINO REAL


ASH STREET

LE

LA

ND

AV

EN

UE

PARK BOULEVARD

STA

NFO

RD

AV

EN

UE

BIRCH STREET

OX

FOR

D A

VE

NU

E

BIRCH STREET

STA

NFO

RD

AV

EN

UE

CO

LE

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

LO

WE

LL

AV

EN

ALMA STREET

MARIPOSA AVENUE

SEQ

UO

IA A

VEN

UE

PAR

K B

OU

LEV

AR

D

BIRCH STREET

LE

LA

ND

AV

EN

UE

LE

LA

ND

AV

EN

UE

ASH STREET

TE

NN

YSO

N A

V

ALMA STREET

BIRCH STREET

NE

W M

AY

FIE

LD

LA

NE

CA

MB

RID

GE

AV

EN

UE

BIRCH STREET

BIRCH STREET

CO

LL

EG

E A

VE

NU

EC

OL

LE

GE

AV

EN

UE

PARK BOULEVARD

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

AV

EN

UE

ALMA STREET

PARK BOULEVARD

SHE

RM

AN

AV

EN

UE

JAC

AR

AN

DA

LA

NE

PARK BOULEVARD

ALMA STREET

PARK BOULEVARD PARK BOULEVARD

OX

FOR

D A

VE

NU

E

SEA

LE

AV

EN

RI N

CO

NA

DA

AV

ALMA STREET SAN

TA

RIT

A A

VE

NU

E

ALMA STREET

HIGH STREET HIGH STREET

CO

LOR

AD

O A

VEN

UEHIGH STREET

ALMA STREETALMA STREET

OREGON EXPRESS

WAY

OR

EG

O

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

AV

EN

UE

NO

RT

H C

AL

IFO

RN

IA A

VE

N

HIGH STREET

UE

CH

UR

CH

ILL

AV

EN

UE

STA

NFO

RD

AV

EN

UE

CH

UR

CH

ILL

A

WILLIAMS STREET

YALE STREET

GR

AN

T A

VE

NU

E

SHE

RM

AN

AV

EN

UE

SHE

RID

AN

AV

EN

UE

SHE

RID

AN

AV

EN

UE

ASH STREET

BIRCH STREET BIRCH STREET

GR

AN

T A

VE

NU

E

PARK BOULEVARD

ALMA STR

PEPP

ER

AV

EN

UE

ASH STREET

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

EL CAMINO REAL

ALMA STREET

STAUNTON COURT

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

PAG

E M

ILL

RO

AD

NOGAL LANE

Ramos Way (Private)

JAC

AR

AN

DA

LA

NE

PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARDRD PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD

OX

FOR

D A

VE

NU

EABRAMS COURT

BAR

NES

CO

UR

T

BO

NA

IR S

IDIN

G

HULME COURT

OLMSTED ROAD

OLM

ST

ED

RO

AD

OL

MS

TE

D R

OA

D

OL

MS

TE

DR

OA

D

OL

MS

TE

DR

OA

D

O L M

ST

ED

RO

AD

OL

MS

TE

D

ROAD

SER

RA

ST

RE

ET

SER

RA

ST

RE

ET

SER

RA

ST

RE

ET

T H O B U R N C O U R T

WELLESLEY STOLMSTED RD

DU

DL

EY

L A N E

YALE STPAMPAS LANE

HOSKI NS COURT

L

SE

RR

A S TR E E T

EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL


OLMSTED ROAD



0' 388'

CIT

Y

OF PALO

ALTOIN

CO R P O R A

T

ED

CAL I FORN I A


AP

RI

L1 6

18

94


FY20

22 O

verla

y

7.a

Packet Pg. 185

tbotkin

Polygon

hnguyen

Callout

Add Alt. #1

hnguyen

Polygon

FY2022 Street Resurfacing Project Engineer's Estimate

UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST1 AC Overlay: 2,235 TON $ 150.00 335,250.00$ $ 127.00 283,845.00$ $ 150.00 335,250.00$ $ 138.00 308,430.00$ $ 172.00 384,420.00$ $ 203.00 453,705.00$ 2 PCC Base Repairs: 3,770 SF $ 15.00 56,550.00$ $ 22.00 82,940.00$ $ 14.00 52,780.00$ $ 27.00 101,790.00$ $ 45.00 169,650.00$ $ 19.00 71,630.00$ 3 AC Milling: 135,839 SF $ 0.60 81,503.40$ $ 0.50 67,919.50$ $ 0.70 95,087.30$ $ 0.74 100,520.86$ $ 0.50 67,919.50$ $ 2.00 271,678.00$ 4 Crack Sealing: 16,000 LF $ 1.50 24,000.00$ $ 0.70 11,200.00$ $ 1.00 16,000.00$ $ 1.00 16,000.00$ $ 2.50 40,000.00$ $ 1.00 16,000.00$ 5 Interlayer Membrane: 1,000 LF $ 5.00 5,000.00$ $ 5.00 5,000.00$ $ 5.00 5,000.00$ $ 5.00 5,000.00$ $ 5.00 5,000.00$ $ 2.00 2,000.00$ 6 Reset Utility Box: 49 EA $ 600.00 29,400.00$ $ 300.00 14,700.00$ $ 1,900.00 93,100.00$ $ 675.00 33,075.00$ $ 1,300.00 63,700.00$ $ 1,600.00 78,400.00$ 7 Reset Manhole: 20 EA $ 1,000.00 20,000.00$ $ 300.00 6,000.00$ $ 1,950.00 39,000.00$ $ 825.00 16,500.00$ $ 1,350.00 27,000.00$ $ 2,500.00 50,000.00$ 8 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials: 2,235 TON $ 5.00 11,175.00$ $ 19.00 42,465.00$ $ 9.00 20,115.00$ $ 12.00 26,820.00$ $ 29.00 64,815.00$ $ 6.00 13,410.00$ 9 Inert recycling containing petromat: 2,235 TON $ 8.00 17,880.00$ $ 5.00 11,175.00$ $ 18.00 40,230.00$ $ 8.00 17,880.00$ $ 48.00 107,280.00$ $ 14.00 31,290.00$ 10 Reset Catch Basin: 2 EA $ 2,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 550.00 1,100.00$ $ 1,500.00 3,000.00$ $ 1,900.00 3,800.00$ $ 1,800.00 3,600.00$ $ 1,700.00 3,400.00$ 11 Type A vertical curb with 1' exposed gutter pan: 302 LF $ 90.00 27,180.00$ $ 100.00 30,200.00$ $ 80.00 24,160.00$ $ 82.00 24,764.00$ $ 33.00 9,966.00$ $ 89.50 27,029.00$ 12 Type A vertical curb with 1' burried gutter pan: 430 LF $ 90.00 38,700.00$ $ 100.00 43,000.00$ $ 66.00 28,380.00$ $ 82.00 35,260.00$ $ 35.00 15,050.00$ $ 116.00 49,880.00$ 13 Type A vertical curb with 3' exposed gutter pan: 538 LF $ 120.00 64,560.00$ $ 120.00 64,560.00$ $ 114.00 61,332.00$ $ 133.00 71,554.00$ $ 77.00 41,426.00$ $ 111.50 59,987.00$ 14 Type A vertical curb with 8' exposed gutter pan: 30 LF $ 230.00 6,900.00$ $ 220.00 6,600.00$ $ 310.00 9,300.00$ $ 262.00 7,860.00$ $ 187.00 5,610.00$ $ 200.00 6,000.00$ 15 Type A 6" Median curb: 19 LF $ 80.00 1,520.00$ $ 55.00 1,045.00$ $ 76.00 1,444.00$ $ 96.00 1,824.00$ $ 50.00 950.00$ $ 79.00 1,501.00$ 16 Type B curb with 3' exposed gutter pan: 712 LF $ 120.00 85,440.00$ $ 120.00 85,440.00$ $ 106.00 75,472.00$ $ 133.00 94,696.00$ $ 77.00 54,824.00$ $ 129.00 91,848.00$ 17 Concrete Sidewalk: 8,000 SF $ 18.00 144,000.00$ $ 17.00 136,000.00$ $ 15.00 120,000.00$ $ 17.85 142,800.00$ $ 20.00 160,000.00$ $ 25.00 200,000.00$ 18 Concrete Driveway: 3,097 SF $ 22.00 68,134.00$ $ 19.00 58,843.00$ $ 20.00 61,940.00$ $ 27.00 83,619.00$ $ 18.00 55,746.00$ $ 42.00 130,074.00$ 19 Type A Curb Ramp: 5 EA $ 5,000.00 25,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 25,000.00$ $ 6,800.00 34,000.00$ $ 6,000.00 30,000.00$ $ 3,500.00 17,500.00$ $ 230.00 1,150.00$ 20 Cast in place truncated domes: 108 SF $ 85.00 9,180.00$ $ 80.00 8,640.00$ $ 200.00 21,600.00$ $ 54.00 5,832.00$ $ 50.00 5,400.00$ $ 65.00 7,020.00$ 21 Brickwork/Pavers Specialty Finishes: 256 SF $ 30.00 7,680.00$ $ 30.00 7,680.00$ $ 25.00 6,400.00$ $ 47.00 12,032.00$ $ 16.00 4,096.00$ $ 50.00 12,800.00$ 22 Thermoplastic Paving Legends: 35 EA $ 30.00 1,050.00$ $ 75.00 2,625.00$ $ 100.00 3,500.00$ $ 100.00 3,500.00$ $ 91.00 3,185.00$ $ 96.00 3,360.00$ 23 Thermo Striping, 4" White: 134 LF $ 3.00 402.00$ $ 5.00 670.00$ $ 4.00 536.00$ $ 4.00 536.00$ $ 5.50 737.00$ $ 3.50 469.00$ 25 Thermo Striping, 12" White: 776 LF $ 5.00 3,880.00$ $ 6.00 4,656.00$ $ 10.00 7,760.00$ $ 9.00 6,984.00$ $ 7.00 5,432.00$ $ 9.50 7,372.00$ 24 Blue Pavement Markers 12 EA $ 360.00 4,320.00$ $ 33.00 396.00$ $ 30.00 360.00$ $ 30.00 360.00$ $ 40.00 480.00$ $ 3.50 42.00$ 26 Thermo Striping, Caltrans Detail 1: 3,000 LF $ 3.00 9,000.00$ $ 1.00 3,000.00$ $ 2.50 7,500.00$ $ 2.50 7,500.00$ $ 1.25 3,750.00$ $ 2.10 6,300.00$ 27 Thermo Striping, Caltrans Detail 21: 396 LF $ 4.00 1,584.00$ $ 2.00 792.00$ $ 5.00 1,980.00$ $ 5.00 1,980.00$ $ 2.50 990.00$ $ 4.50 1,782.00$ 28 Thermo Striping, Caltrans Detail 22: 170 LF $ 5.00 850.00$ $ 2.20 374.00$ $ 5.50 935.00$ $ 6.00 1,020.00$ $ 2.75 467.50$ $ 5.40 918.00$ 29 Red Curb Paint: 7 LF $ 10.00 70.00$ $ 5.00 35.00$ $ 12.00 84.00$ $ 20.00 140.00$ $ 6.00 42.00$ $ 12.00 84.00$ 30 Traffic Dectector Loop: 4 SF $ 2,500.00 10,000.00$ $ 1,400.00 5,600.00$ $ 2,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 1,575.00 6,300.00$ $ 1,650.00 6,600.00$ $ 4,000.00 16,000.00$ 31 Traffic Control: 1 LS $ 30,000.00 30,000.00$ $ 60,000.00 60,000.00$ $ 22,000.00 22,000.00$ $ 85,000.00 85,000.00$ $ 50,000.00 50,000.00$ $ 35,000.00 35,000.00$ 32 Notices: 1 LS $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 12,500.00 12,500.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 25,000.00 25,000.00$ 33 Utility Tie Out Drawings: 1 LS $ 1,200.00 1,200.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 4,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 3,000.00 3,000.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 34 Tree Trimming: 6 HRS $ 250.00 1,500.00$ $ 350.00 2,100.00$ $ 375.00 2,250.00$ $ 500.00 3,000.00$ $ 350.00 2,100.00$ $ 320.00 1,920.00$ 34 Misc. Transportation Improvements: 1 LS $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ $ 8,000.00 8,000.00$ 35 Striping Allowance 1 LS $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$ $ 15,000.00 15,000.00$

1,152,908.40$ 1,104,600.50$ 1,236,995.30$ 1,288,376.86$ 1,408,736.00$ 1,705,049.00$

Contingency 115,290.84$ $ 110,460.05 $ 123,699.53 $ 128,837.69 $ 140,873.60 $ 170,504.90

Total 1,268,199.24$ 1,215,060.55$ 1,360,694.83$ 1,417,214.55$ 1,549,609.60$ 1,875,553.90$

UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST UNIT COST TOTAL COST1 AC Overlay: 319 TON $ 150.00 47,850.00$ $ 127.00 40,513.00$ $ 152.00 48,488.00$ $ 138.00 44,022.00$ $ 172.00 54,868.00$ $ 208.00 66,352.00$ 2 AC Milling: 17,000 SF $ 0.60 10,200.00$ $ 0.75 12,750.00$ $ 1.00 17,000.00$ $ 0.74 12,580.00$ $ 0.50 8,500.00$ $ 2.00 34,000.00$ 3 Reset Utility Box: 2 EA $ 600.00 1,200.00$ $ 300.00 600.00$ $ 1,900.00 3,800.00$ $ 675.00 1,350.00$ $ 1,300.00 2,600.00$ $ 1,800.00 3,600.00$ 4 Reset Manhole: 1 EA $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 300.00 300.00$ $ 1,950.00 1,950.00$ $ 825.00 825.00$ $ 1,350.00 1,350.00$ $ 3,500.00 3,500.00$ 5 Recycling of Inert Solid Materials: 319 TON $ 5.00 1,595.00$ $ 19.00 6,061.00$ $ 18.00 5,742.00$ $ 12.00 3,828.00$ $ 29.00 9,251.00$ $ 8.00 2,552.00$ 6 Inert recycling containing petromat: 319 TON $ 8.00 2,552.00$ $ 5.00 1,595.00$ $ 6.00 1,914.00$ $ 8.00 2,552.00$ $ 48.00 15,312.00$ $ 16.00 5,104.00$ 7 Type A vertical curb with 3' exposed gutter pan: 79 LF $ 120.00 9,480.00$ $ 120.00 9,480.00$ $ 114.00 9,006.00$ $ 133.00 10,507.00$ $ 77.00 6,083.00$ $ 175.00 13,825.00$ 8 Concrete Sidewalk: 380 SF $ 18.00 6,840.00$ $ 17.00 6,460.00$ $ 15.00 5,700.00$ $ 17.85 6,783.00$ $ 20.00 7,600.00$ $ 15.50 5,890.00$ 9 Concrete Driveway: 195 SF $ 22.00 4,290.00$ $ 19.00 3,705.00$ $ 20.00 3,900.00$ $ 27.00 5,265.00$ $ 18.00 3,510.00$ $ 55.00 10,725.00$ 10 Thermoplastic Paving Legends: 8 EA $ 30.00 240.00$ $ 75.00 600.00$ $ 100.00 800.00$ $ 100.00 800.00$ $ 91.00 728.00$ $ 96.00 768.00$ 11 Blue Pavement markers 1 EA $ 30.00 30.00$ $ 33.00 33.00$ $ 30.00 30.00$ $ 50.00 50.00$ $ 40.00 40.00$ $ 35.00 35.00$ 12 Thermo Striping, 12" White: 31 LF $ 5.00 155.00$ $ 6.00 186.00$ $ 10.00 310.00$ $ 10.00 310.00$ $ 7.00 217.00$ $ 10.00 310.00$ 13 Traffic Control: 1 LS $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ $ 10,000.00 10,000.00$ $ 5,600.00 5,600.00$ $ 6,000.00 6,000.00$ $ 4,000.00 4,000.00$ $ 10,500.00 10,500.00$ 14 Notices: 1 LS $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 650.00 650.00$ $ 2,500.00 2,500.00$ $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 20,000.00 20,000.00$ 15 Utility Tie Out Drawings: 1 LS $ 200.00 200.00$ $ 1,000.00 1,000.00$ $ 650.00 650.00$ $ 2,000.00 2,000.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 16 Tree Trimming: 1 HRS $ 250.00 250.00$ $ 350.00 350.00$ $ 400.00 400.00$ $ 500.00 500.00$ $ 350.00 350.00$ $ 360.00 360.00$

91,382.00$ 95,633.00$ 105,940.00$ 99,872.00$ 115,909.00$ 182,521.00$

Contingency 9,138.20$ Contingency 9,563.30$ Contingency 10,594.00$ Contingency 9,987.20$ Contingency 11,590.90$ Contingency 18,252.10$

Total 100,520.20$ Total 105,196.30$ Total 116,534.00$ Total 109,859.20$ Total 127,499.90$ Total 200,773.10$

Project Total 1,244,290.40$ Project Total 1,200,233.50$ Project Total 1,342,935.30$ Project Total 1,388,248.86$ Project Total 1,524,645.00$ Project Total 1,887,570.00$ % over/under 0% % over/under -4% % over/under 8% % over/under 12% % over/under 23% % over/under 52%

27%over

Asphalt Surfacing Inc.

22%over

100%over

G. Bortolotto & Company Inc.

12%over

9%over

Catos Paving Inc.

48%over

Azul Works Inc.O'Grady Paving Inc.

Base Bid Total (Items 001 through 33)

BID ITEM DESCRIPTION - BASE BID APPROX. QTY UNIT

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE

7%over

-4%under

over over

UNITENGINEER'S ESTIMATE

5% 16%

DESCRIPTION - ADD ALT 1 APPROX. QTY

Add Alt 1 Total (Items 001 through 16)

BID ITEM

7.b

Packet Pg. 186




Title: Approval of Amendment Number One to Contract C19173550 with Accela, Inc. to add the Accela Mobile Office and Accela Electronic Reporting Database Modules to this Online Services Contract, and to Increase the Compensation by an Amount Not-To-Exceed $57,210 for a New Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $848,554

From: City Manager

Lead Department: IT Department

Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Amendment No. 1 to Contract C19173550 with Accela, Inc. including an increase the compensation by $57,210, from $791,344 to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $848,554. Background Accela is a technology system that is used primarily to assist in the provision of services in the Development Center. Accela Automation (City side) and Accela Citizen Access (public side), both web-based applications, allow the City of Palo Alto, contractors, and residents to apply for and check the status of permits. The system also allows field inspection staff to provide results of the inspections in the field which increases communication efforts with the applicant and internal staff. Accela allows residents and contractors to apply for all permits online and check the status of permits via the internet on a 24-hour, 7 days per week basis regardless of the City’s normal business hours. Accela GovXML provides a common interface for web-based government applications, and a means of information transfer between back-end systems and front-end, vendor-agnostic applications. Discussion The City originally procured Accela Mobile Office (AMO) licenses in 2013, separately from Contract C19173550 for Accela Automation, GovXML and Citizen Access online-hosted services. Staff now recommend bringing all Accela online-hosted services, including the extension and continued use of the AMO module and adding the new Enhanced Reporting Database feature (described below), under one contract, Contract C19173550, via this Amendment No. 1.

8

Packet Pg. 187


The AMO module extend processing capabilities to the field for inspections, code enforcement, and service requests. AMO provides real-time, visual access of data in the City’s Online Permitting Services database from a mobile device. AMO allows the City to configure the application based on user roles, displaying information for different user types and has the ability to work offline for City users that have limited or no connectivity in the field. AMO also is the primary software used for contractors to ‘self-schedule’ inspections via mobile apps. AMO features including, but are not limited to: • Cancel, reschedule, or reassign field appointments, • Sign off on jobs and submit results back to the agency in real-time, • Utilize offline capabilities when in a remote area. • Create new inspections, investigations, or service requests. The Accela Enhanced Reporting Database (ERD) feature to be added via this amendment will allow the City to access, develop and run reports against near real-time copy of the City’s Accela Automation database to increase business process efficiency by providing business intelligence insights and informative data points from available tools such as Microsoft Power BI and/or Tableau or any other business intelligence software the City may procure and implement in the future. Access to ERD can provide additional features, including but not limited to; • Near real-time data analytics, • Superior reporting capabilities and informative ‘dashboards’, • Integration with other systems, and • Data redundancy for increased data security. Currently, Accela includes reporting and exporting capabilities as part of its standard feature set which requires staff to maintain and add reports that assist active users of the system. Real-time direct access to the data with ERD access can facilitate automated filtering and uploading of permit data to the City’s Open Data portal for public consumption. Providing these types of data analytics to the public in the past, such as the City’s Online Parcel Report, greatly reduced ‘one-off’ inquiries and associated manual staff work. Likewise, direct data access can be used with analytics software (e.g., ArcGIS - which the City is currently transitioning to, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, etc.) to create ‘dashboard’ type analytics regarding performance measures and permit processing times ‘by type of permit’ for managers, directors, decision makers and other stakeholders. Access to Accela’s ERD can further boost the City’s ongoing and future needs for data driven discussions and decisions. The terms of this amendment for service align with the existing contract expiration date of 09/30/2023 for one year and six months. Total cost of services for the Accela Mobile Office and the Enhanced Reporting Database will be, $21,834 and $35,376,

8

Packet Pg. 188


respectively, bringing the total maximum amount of the contract from $791,344 to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $848,554. If not approved, the mobile inspector application for fieldwork related to building, public works, and fire inspections will be impacted. Without the access, inspectors will not have the ability to track and complete inspections in the field. Additionally, without the Enhanced Reporting Database, Planning and Development Services will have limited access to reporting information, including advanced business and operational metrics made available by this service. Resource Impact Funding for this contract amendment in FY 2022 is within budgeted levels adopted by the City Council, no additional funding is requested. Technology costs are cost recovered at the Development Center through a 2% technology fee that is assessed on private construction projects. Planning fees also capture technology costs for the intended purpose of technology maintenance and enhancements. Funding for future fiscal years is subject to City Council approval through the annual budget process. Stakeholder Engagement No stakeholder engagement was performed related to the contract amendment; when the contract is up for renewal stakeholder engagement related to this service and program will be performed. Environmental Review These services do not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Attachments:

• Attachment8.a: Attachment A: Accela, Inc. Contract; C19173550 Amendment #1

8

Packet Pg. 189

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 1 of 17

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. C19173550 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND ACCELA, INC.

This Amendment No. 1(this “Amendment”) to Contract No. C19173550 (the “Contract” as defined below) is entered into as of March 21, 2022, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation (“CITY”), and ACCELA, INC., a California corporation, located at 2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 500, San Ramon, CA 94583 (“CONTRACTOR”). CITY and CONTRACTOR are referred to collectively as the “Parties” in this Amendment.

R E C I T A L S

A. The Contract (as defined below) was entered into by and between the Parties hereto for the provision of CONTRACTOR’S online-hosted Accela Automation (Legacy) and Accela GovXML software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) platform (also referred to as the “Subscription Service(s)”) and related annual maintenance and support services, as detailed therein.

B. The Parties now wish to amend the Contract in order to add to the scope of

services: 1) the maintenance, support, and managed services for Accela Mobile Office, and 2) access to Accela’s Enhanced Reporting Database, and, accordingly, to increase the compensation by $57,209.90, from $791,343.57 to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $848,553.47, as detailed herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions

of this Amendment, the Parties agree: SECTION 1. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this Amendment:

a. Contract. The term “Contract” shall mean Contract No. C19173550

between CONSULTANT and CITY, dated October 1, 2018.

b. Other Terms. Capitalized terms used and not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Contract.

SECTION 2. Section 1, “SERVICES,” of the Contract is hereby amended to read as follows: “CONTRACTOR shall provide or furnish the services described in the attached Exhibit A (“Scope of Services”), Exhibit A-1 (“Accela, Inc. Standard SaaS Support Policy”), Exhibit A-3 (“Mobile Office Work Order”), and Exhibit A-4 (“Enhanced Reporting Database Work Order”), collectively, the “Services”.”

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1152560B-7897-4AD5-A67D-E04212FECE888.a

Packet Pg. 190


SECTION 3. Section 2, “EXHIBITS,” of the Contract is hereby amended to read as follows: “The following exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Agreement:

“A” - Scope of Services “A-1” – Accela, Inc. Standard SaaS Support Policy “A-2” – Accela, Inc. Subscription Services Terms and Conditions “A-3” – Mobile Office Work Order “A-4” – Enhanced Reporting Database Work Order “B” - Schedule of Performance “C” – Schedule of Fees “D” - Insurance Requirements “E” – Vendor Cybersecurity Terms and Conditions “F” – Information Privacy Policy”

SECTION 4. Section 5, “COMPENSATION FOR ORIGINAL TERM,” of the Contract is hereby amended to read as follows: “CITY shall pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept as not-to-exceed compensation for the full performance of the Services and reimbursable expenses, if any:

A sum calculated in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth at Exhibit C, not to exceed a total maximum compensation amount of Eight Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Three dollars and forty-seven cents ($848,553.47).

CONTRACTOR agrees that it can perform the Services for an amount not to exceed the total maximum compensation set forth above, subject to the City meetings its obligations and without a change of scope of the Services. Any hours worked or services performed by CONTRACTOR for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth above for performance of the Services shall be at no cost to CITY, except as otherwise agreed in writing. “

SECTION 5. The following exhibit(s) to the Contract is/are hereby amended or added, as indicated below, to read as set forth in the attachment(s) to this Amendment, which is/are hereby incorporated in full into this Amendment and into the Contract by this reference:

a. Exhibit “A” entitled “SCOPE OF SERVICES”, AMENDED, REPLACES

PREVIOUS.

b. Exhibit “A-3” entitled “MOBILE OFFICE WORK ORDER”, ADDED.

c. Exhibit “A-4” entitled “ENHANCED REPORTING DATABASE WORK ORDER”, ADDED.


Packet Pg. 191


d. Exhibit “B” entitled “SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE”, AMENDED, REPLACES

PREVIOUS.

e. Exhibit “C” entitled “COMPENSATION”, AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS. SECTION 6. Legal Effect. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other provisions of

the Contract, including any exhibits thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 7. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are terms of this Amendment and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. (SIGNATURE BLOCK FOLLOWS ON THE NEXT PAGE.)


Packet Pg. 192


SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have by their duly authorized representatives

executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above written.

CITY OF PALO ALTO City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney or designee

ACCELA, INC. Officer 1 By: Name: Title: Officer 2 (Required for Corp. or LLC) By: Name: Title:

Attachments: Exhibit A: SCOPE OF SERVICES (AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS) Exhibit A-3: MOBILE OFFICE WORK ORDER (ADDED) Exhibit A-4: ENHANCED REPORTING DATABASE WORK ORDER (ADDED) Exhibit B: SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE (AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS) Exhibit C: SCHEDULE OF FEES (AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 1152560B-7897-4AD5-A67D-E04212FECE88

Chief Legal Officer

Aaron Haggarty

CFO

Robert Wilson

8.a

Packet Pg. 193


EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES

AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS For the term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR (Accela Inc.) shall provide CITY with access to and use of CONTRACTOR’S online-hosted Accela Automation (Legacy) and Accela GovXML software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) platform (also referred to as the “Subscription Service(s)”) as detailed in this Exhibit “A”, and, in relation the Subscription Services, CONTRACTOR shall provide the CITY with annual maintenance and support services as detailed in Exhibit “A-1”. Accela Automation (Legacy) - Accela Automation (CITY side) and Accela Citizen Access (Public side), are web-based applications that allow the CITY, its contractors, and its citizens to apply for and check the status of permits. Accela Automation contains the following modules:

• Building, Permitting and Inspection • Planning Entitlements • Code Enforcement • Fire Permits • Public Works • Business License • Utilities • Accela Citizen Access (Public side)

Accela GovXML provides a common interface for web-based government applications, and a means of information transfer between back-end systems and front-end, vendor-agnostic applications. For purposes of Exhibit A and Exhibit A-1, the participants are identified as follows:

City of Palo Alto: “Customer” Contractor: “Accela”

1. Service Availability: Accela shall use commercially reasonable efforts to (a) provide bandwidth sufficient for Customer’s use of the Subscription Services provided hereunder and (b) operate and manage the Subscription Services with a ninety-nine and one-half percent (99.5%) uptime goal (the “Availability SLA”), excluding situations identified as “Excluded” below. “Excluded" means any outage that results from any of the following:

a. Any maintenance performed by Accela during Accela’s standard maintenance windows. Accela shall notify Customer within forty-eight (48) hours of any standard maintenance and within twenty-four (24) hours for other non-standard emergency maintenance (collectively referred to herein as “Scheduled Maintenance”).


Packet Pg. 194


b. Customer’s information content or application programming, or the acts or omissions of Customer or its agents, including, without limitation, the following:

1. Customer’s use of any programs not supplied by Accela; 2. Customer’s failure to provide Accela with reasonable advance prior notice of any pending unusual large deployments of new nodes (i.e., adding over ten (10) percent total nodes in less than twenty-four (24) hours); 3. Customer’s implementation of any significant configuration changes, including changes that lead to a greater than thirty percent (30%) change in a one week period or greater than fifty percent (50%) change in a one month period in the number of key objects in the system including but not limited to metrics, snapshots, nodes, events and business transactions; and 4. Any mis-configuration by Customer (as determined in Accela’s sole discretion), including, without limitation, configuration errors and bad or unintended usage of the Subscription Services. 5. Force majeure or other circumstances beyond Contractor’s reasonable control that could not be avoided by its exercise of due care.

d. Failures of the Internet backbone itself and the network by which Customer connects to the Internet backbone or any other network unavailability. e. Any window of time when Customer agrees that Subscription Services availability/unavailability shall not be monitored or counted. f. Any problems resulting from Customer combining or merging the Subscription Services with any hardware or software not supplied by Accela or not identified by Accela in the Specifications as being compatible with the Subscription Services. g. Interruptions or delays in providing the Subscription Services resulting from telecommunication or Internet service provider failures. h. Customer’s or any third party’s use of the Subscription Services in an unauthorized or unlawful manner.

2. Remedies for Excessive Downtime: In the event the Availability of the Subscription Services falls below the Availability SLA in a given calendar month, Accela shall pay Customer a service credit (“Service Credit”) equal to the percentage of the fees set forth in the table below corresponding to the actual Availability of the Subscription Services during the applicable calendar month. Such Service Credit shall be issued as a credit against any fees owed by Customer for the next calendar month of the term of the Agreement or, if Customer does not owe any additional fees, then Accela shall pay Customer the amount of the applicable Service Credit within thirty (30) days after the end of the calendar month in which such credit accrued. Such Service Credit shall be in addition to any other remedies available to Customer at law, in equity or under this Agreement. System availability is measured by the following formula: x = (n - y) *100 / n


Packet Pg. 195


Notes: (1) "x" is the uptime percentage; "n" is the total number of hours in the given calendar month minus scheduled downtime; and "y" is the total number of downtime hours in the given calendar month. (2) Specifically excluded from "n and "y" in this calculation are the exception times on scheduled upgrade and maintenance windows.

Service Availability Percentage of Monthly Service Fees Credite >99.5% 0%

95.0% - < 99.5% 5% (max of $280) 90.0% - < 95.0% 10% (max of $560) 80.0% - < 90.0% 20% (max $840) 70.0% - < 80.0% 30% (max of $1,120) 60.0% - < 70.0% 40% (max of $1,400)

< 50% 50% (max of $2,800)

Customer Account Login: For Accela user interface access, Accela uses TLS 1.2 with AES 256 bit or similar encryption for protection of data in transit, which is supported by most modern browsers. Accela shall also restrict applicable administrative user interface access to Customer corporate networks for additional security on written request by Customer.

3. Hosting: Accela’s SaaS platform (servers, infrastructure and storage) for the Subscription Services is and shall remain hosted in one of the largest Tier III data centers in North America, specifically designed and constructed to deliver world-class physical security, power availability, infrastructure flexibility and growth capacity. Accela’s data center provider is and shall remain SSAE 16/ 18 SOC2 compliant, meaning it has been fully independently audited to verify the validity and functionality of its control activities and processes. Every Server for the Services is and shall remain operated in a fully redundant fail-over pair to ensure high availability. Data is and shall remain backed up nightly, stored redundantly and shall be restored rapidly in case of failure. Accela also provides an off-site backup service, which is available at an additional cost. Security Patching and updates are actively evaluated by engineers and shall be deployed based upon the security risks and stability benefits they offer to Acela’s SaaS platform and Customers. Accela shall attempt to provide customers reasonable prior notice to security changes, updates and patches, unless the delay shall lead to a significant risk of impact to customer data. AMENDMENT NO. 1: In addition to the above Services to be provided, CONTRACTOR will also provide the following Services (added with Amendment No. 1):

A. City access to and use of Accela Mobile Office maintenance, support, and managed services. Accela Mobile Office works with Accela Automation to provide field access for activities such as inspections, investigations, disaster response, code enforcement, work orders, and service requests. Accela Automation updates records in the Accela Automation database based on user


Packet Pg. 196


inputs from the Accela Mobile Office device. Accela Mobile Office runs on Windows operating systems and mobile devices such as PDAs, tablet PCs, and laptops. Accela Mobile Office is part of Accela’s software-as-a-service offerings.

B. City access to and use of Accela Enhanced Reporting Database. The Accela Enhanced Reporting Database ensures customers get the most out of their data with near real-time replication of transaction data into a read-only database for reporting. The Accela Enhanced Reporting Database enables customers to perform any reporting they want with their tool of choice, with no impact to their transaction systems. The Accela Enhanced Reporting Database is part of Accela’s software-as-a-service offerings.


Packet Pg. 197


EXHIBIT A-3 MOBILE OFFICE WORK ORDER

(ADDED)

* The parties understand and agree that Exhibit A-3 has 3 pages total, not 4 as indicated in the exhibit’s footer.


Packet Pg. 198

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 10 of 17


Packet Pg. 199

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 11 of 17


Packet Pg. 200

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 12 of 17

EXHIBIT A-4 ENHANCED REPORTING DATABASE WORK ORDER

(ADDED)

* The parties understand and agree that Exhibit A-4 has 3 pages total, not 2 as indicated in the exhibit’s footer.


Packet Pg. 201

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 13 of 17


Packet Pg. 202

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 14 of 17


Packet Pg. 203

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 15 of 17

EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

(AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS) CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services detailed in Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “A-1” according to the following schedule: 1. Accela Automation Annual Managed Service Fees (Legacy) Renewal

Accela GovXML Annual Maintenance and Support Renewal October 1, 2018-September 30, 2019

2. Accela Automation Annual Managed Service Fees (Legacy) Renewal





Accela GovXML Annual Maintenance and Support Renewal October 1, 2021- September 30, 2022



AMENDMENT NO. 1: In addition to the above, CONTRACTOR will also provide the following Services (added with Amendment No. 1) according to the following schedule: 6. Accela Mobile Office

Accela Mobile Office Annual Maintenance and Support Renewal April 1, 2022-September 30, 2022

7. Accela Mobile Office

Accela Mobile Office Annual Maintenance and Support Renewal October 1, 2022-September 30, 2023


Packet Pg. 204

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 16 of 17


Accela Mobile Office Managed Service Fees April 1, 2022-September 30, 2022


Accela Mobile Office Managed Service Fees October 1, 2022-September 30, 2023

10. Accela Enhanced Reporting Database

Accela Enhanced Reporting Database April 1, 2022-September 30, 2022

11. Accela Enhanced Reporting Database

Accela Enhanced Reporting Database October 1, 2022-September 30, 2023


Packet Pg. 205

Vers.: Aug. 5, 2019 Page 17 of 17

EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF FEES

(AMENDED, REPLACES PREVIOUS) CITY will pay CONTRACTOR according to the following rate schedule. The maximum amount of compensation to be paid to CONTRACTOR, including both payment for services and reimbursable expenses specified herein, if any, will not exceed the amounts set forth in Sections 5 and 6 of the Agreement. Any services provided or hours worked for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth herein will be at no cost to CITY.

Item Number Description Qty Ext. Price HR10A0000000601 MR100XML0000602

Accela Automation Annual Managed Service Fees (Legacy) Renewal Accela GovXML Annual Maintenance and Support Renewal

1 1

$145,766.76 $3,286.42

Term: 10/1/18-9/30/19 $149,053.18 HR10A0000000601 MR100XML0000602


1 1

$150,139.76 $3,385.01

Term: 10/1/19-9/30/20 $153,524.77 HR10A0000000601 MR100XML0000602


1 1

$154,643.95 $3,486.57

Term: 10/1/20-9/30/21 $158,130.52 HR10A0000000601 MR100XML0000602


1 1

$159,283.27 $3,591.16

Term: 10/1/21-9/30/22 $162,874.43 HR10A0000000601 MR100XML0000602


1 1

$164,061.77 $3,698.90

Term: 10/1/22-9/30/23 $167,760.67 Amendment No. 1 Accela Mobile Office Maintenance and Support Renewal

Accela Mobile Office Managed Service Fees Accela Enhanced Reporting Database

1 1 1

$6,119.73 $923.40

$11,548.23 Term: 4/1/22-9/30/22 $18,591.36 Amendment No. 1 Accela Mobile Office Maintenance and Support Renewal

Accela Mobile Office Managed Service Fees Accela Enhanced Reporting Database

1 1 1

$12,851.44 $1,939.14

$23,827.96 Term: 10/1/22-9/30/23 $38,618.54 Subtotal of Original 5-year Total: $791,343.57 Subtotal of Amendment No 1: $57,209.90 TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT: $848,553.47


Packet Pg. 206




Title: Direct Staff to Relinquish S. Palo Alto Bikeways Project Grant Under OBAG2 and Reapply Under OBAG3 in May, 2022 to Allow For Additional Time to Meet Project Outreach, Design, and CEQA Requirements

From: City Manager

Lead Department: Transportation Department Recommendation Staff recommends that Council direct Office of Transportation (OOT) staff to relinquish the One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG2) construction grant and apply for One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 (OBAG3) construction funds and other funds as necessary for the South Palo Alto Bikeways Project. This will better align with the anticipated project timeline and allow staff to prioritize other projects. This includes advancing the California Avenue/Ramona Street Closure study and launch the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan update in the short-term while the South Palo Alto Bikeways Projects moves to the next grant cycle, with applications due in May. Background The South Palo Alto Bikeways project proposes bicycle facility improvements for the Waverley Multi-Use Path on Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) land between East Meadow Drive and East Charleston Road, Fabian Way from E. Meadow Drive to E. Charleston Road, and East Meadow Drive from Alma Street to Fabian Way (Figure 1). In 2017, the project was awarded federal funds from the Vehicle Emissions Reductions Based at Schools (VERBS) program, a subprogram of the One Bay Area Grant 2 (OBAG 2) program, for construction costs. The project must receive all Caltrans approvals to initiate construction by January 2023.

9

Packet Pg. 207


Figure 1: South Palo Alto Bikeways Project Segments Council approved a robust outreach process in January 2021, with the grant on a tight timeline

for delivery. Phase 1 community engagement was completed in mid-2021, and the initial

project conceptual plans were shared with Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) in

July 2021 and approved by Council on August 9, 2021.1 The project website that contains public

outreach presentations, recorded webinars, virtual route tours, and prior Council and PTC staff

reports can be viewed here.

Discussion Lack of staff resources in several departments has delayed the Bikeways project such that City and VTA staff are not confident the project will meet the obligation deadline imposed by the grant. At project kickoff, VTA staff advised the City to complete outreach, design, and environmental review by October 1, 2022 when the complete project design package is due to Caltrans in order to meet a January 31, 2023 grant obligation deadline. The Senior Transportation Planner who led this project left the Office of Transportation in July 2021. Staff sought interim project management help from contractors but were unable to find resources. New staff recruitment had significant delays, with a final candidate coming on board in late February 2022. Despite the vacancy, the Office of Transportation continued to push the project forward, releasing a Request for Proposals in November and selecting a vendor in December to conduct outreach and design. Procurement staff experienced vacancies and COVID delays and were not able to award the contract until February 8, 2022. Work has not yet started on the subsequent outreach phases for the Bikeways project. Given recent Council assignment of a

1 August 9, 2021 Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/2021/id-12323.pdf

9

Packet Pg. 208

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Transportation/Transportation-Projects/South-Palo-Alto-Bikeways-Project




new study on California Avenue and Ramona Street2, this is an appropriate time to re-prioritize staff resources for OOT projects. The following paragraphs discuss options with respect to the S. Palo Alto Bikeways project. Grant Retention: Limited Public Engagement and Project Risk Retaining the OBAG2 grant will require limiting public engagement on this project which is counter to Council direction to improve public engagement practices. In order to meet the October deadline, public outreach to the school communities would have to occur in the summer when schools are not in session and families are difficult to reach. In addition, several phases of public engagement promised to the community would need to be eliminated. Even if staff could complete limited public outreach and all phases of design on this timeline, VTA staff have recommended that the City return the grant based on project processing times by Caltrans. Despite Caltrans’ aspirational goals for the environmental review that would need to occur before the October deadline above, VTA believes that due to recent experience with other projects, Caltrans will take longer and may jeopardize the City’s ability to meet the grant deadline. Not meeting the deadline will be marked as a project delivery failure by regional and state funders and will count against the City in future funding applications, whereas returning the funds does not jeopardize the City’s future grant prospects. Grant Relinquishment and Re-application: Increased Funding Potential, Public Engagement, & Coordination with PAUSD Grant relinquishment allows the City to complete promised community engagement when staff resources allow, resulting in a better project and, potentially, an increase in grant funds. VTA staff indicate that the OBAG3 funding program will open in May this year and that the Bikeways project would be competitive for funds due to its proximity to employment centers and installation of road safety and traffic calming features. Re-applying for funds will likely result in more grant funds for construction because the current construction grant amount is based on the 2016 project cost estimate. Through the re-application process, staff will be able to generate a more accurate construction project cost in 2022 dollars. OOT staff would likely engage consultant support to apply for OBAG3 funds. Staff would continue to pursue other funding sources if an OBAG3 application is unsuccessful. When staff resources allow, OOT could continue the outreach and design phases of the Bikeways project as before and deliver on the public outreach the community demands, such as school-based outreach during the school year. In addition, the Hoover Elementary School re-construction project and its effects on the Waverley path were not contemplated when the original Bikeways grant was written. PAUSD staff have indicated that the school reconstruction in the next three years could allow for additional space to be allotted to the Waverley path.

2 February 28, 2022 Staff Report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2022/20220228/20220228pccsm-amended-qa-and-item-12-presentation.pdf

9

Packet Pg. 209


Pausing the Bikeways project gives staff additional time to coordinate on the Waverley path with PAUSD as the Hoover plans develop. Alternatives and Council Priority Alternatives to the staff recommendation include continuing the S. Palo Alto Bikeways project outreach and design phases planned for 2022, beginning work on the California Avenue/Ramona Street Closure feasibility study, and pausing the launch of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan update until staff resources allow. Another alternative is for staff to continue the S. Palo Alto Bikeways project outreach and design phases planned for 2022, launch the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan update, and delay work on the California Avenue/Ramona Street Closure feasibility study until staff resources allow. The staff recommendation on this item is based on Council direction on February 28th regarding the California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure study which is an element of Council’s Workplan for its 2022 Economic Recovery and Transition Priority.3 Timeline If approved, staff will immediately relinquish the OBAG2 grant to VTA, pause the public engagement and design phases of the Bikeways project, and begin work on the Council directives regarding the feasibility study for California Ave and Ramona Street. Finally, staff will prepare an OBAG3 grant application in May and June of 2022. The South Palo Alto Bikeways project will be paused and resume when resources allow. Resource Impact Relinquishing the $919,000 of One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 for Vehicle Emission Reductions Based at Schools (VERBS) construction grant to VTA will remove the budgeted Revenue from Other Agencies amounts of $459,677 in FY 2022 and in FY 2023 from the Safe Routes to School Capital Improvement Fund (PL-00026) CIP. In FY 2021, a total of $781,000 was budgeted in PL-00026 to fund the planned engagement, environmental, and design work needed to prepare the project for construction through staff reports 11757 and 11872. Policy Implications South Palo Alto Bikeways The South Palo Alto Bikeways Project is consistent with the following goals, policies, and programs in the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Element: Goal T-1: Create a sustainable transportation system, complimented by a mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling, use of public transportation and other methods to reduce GHG emissions and the use of single occupancy motor vehicles.

3 See packet page 90 of the Economic Recovery Workplan: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/city-manager/fourth-progress-report-on-palo-altos-community-and-economic-recovery-workplan-cmr-13871.pdf

9

Packet Pg. 210

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/city-manager/fourth-progress-report-on-palo-altos-community-and-economic-recovery-workplan-cmr-13871.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/city-manager/fourth-progress-report-on-palo-altos-community-and-economic-recovery-workplan-cmr-13871.pdf


Policy T-1.1: Take a comprehensive approach to reducing single-occupant vehicle trips by involving those who live, work and shop in Palo Alto in developing strategies that make it easier and more convenient not to drive. Policy T-1.3: Reduce GHG and pollutant emissions associated with transportation by reducing VMT and per-mile emissions through increasing transit options, supporting biking and walking, and through the use of zero-emission vehicle technologies to meet City and State goals for GHG reductions by 2030. Policy T-1.25 Pursue transportation funding opportunities for ongoing transportation improvements that will help mitigate the impacts of future development and protect residents’ quality of life. When other sources are unavailable, continue to fund improvements, operations and maintenance through the general fund.

Goal T-2: Decrease delay, congestion, and VMT with a priority on our worst intersections and our peak commute times, including school traffic.

Policy T-2.7: Work with the PAUSD to resolve traffic congestion issues associated with student drop-off and pick-up. Address pedestrian and bicycle access, circulation and related issues such as coordinating bell schedules on City rightsof-way adjacent to schools and on PAUSD property.

Goal T-3: Maintain an efficient roadway network for all users.

Policy T-3.5: When constructing or modifying roadways, plan for use of the roadway by all users.

Program T3.5.1: Continue to use best practices in roadway design that are consistent with complete streets principles and the Urban Forest Master Plan, focusing on bicycle and pedestrian safety and multi-modal uses. Consider opportunities to incorporate best practices from the National Association of City Transportation Officials guidelines for urban streets and bikeways tailored to the Palo Alto context. Policy T-3.14: Continue to prioritize the safety of school children in street modification projects that affect school travel routes, including during construction.

Goal T-4: Protect streets and adopted school commute corridors that contribute to neighborhood character and provide a range of local transportation options.

Policy T-4.2: Continue to construct traffic calming measures to slow traffic on local and collector residential streets, and prioritize traffic calming measures for safety over congestion management.

9

Packet Pg. 211


Goal T-6: Provide a safe environment for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists on Palo Alto streets.

Policy T-6.1: Continue to make safety the first priority of citywide transportation planning. Prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile safety over motor vehicle level of service at intersections and motor vehicle parking.

Policy T-6.4: Continue the Safe Routes to School partnership with PAUSD and the Palo

Alto Council of PTAs.

Policy T-6.6: Use engineering, enforcement and educational tools to improve safety for

all users on City roadways.

Additionally, the South Palo Alto Bikeways Project is consistent with the following top

recommended projects in the Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan 2012:

BB-3 Bryant Street Bicycle Boulevard: Wayfinding signs and pavement markings south of Bryant

Street. Spot improvements for additional safety and comfort, including Churchill/Coleridge

Avenue spot improvement and arterial crossing enhancements at University Avenue, Meadow

Drive (consider beacon or signal), Charleston Road, and San Antonio Road at Nita Drive into

Mountain View.

BK-7 Meadow St / El Camino Way / Los Robles Enhanced Bikeway: Potential cycletrack redesign or enhanced striping and signage of existing bike lanes between La Donna and Meadow Street along Los Robles/El Camino Way; Enhanced striping and signage, including intersection through-markings, for existing Meadow Street bike lanes from El Camino Way to Fabian Way.

BK-9 Fabian Way Enhanced Bikeway: Potential cycle track or enhanced striping and signage of

existing substandard (time restricted) bike lanes to improve safety and access to Adobe Creek

Highway 101 crossing, Charleston bike lanes to San Antonio Road

TR-2 Adobe Creek Reach Trail: Upgrade the existing Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) maintenance road to a Class I trail facility from W. Bayshore Road at Adobe Creek to E. Meadow Drive. This trail would help connect the existing Benjamin Lefkowitz underpass and future potential overcrossing. California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure Study The California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure feasibility study is consistent with the following goals, policies, and programs in the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Element:

9

Packet Pg. 212


Goal T-1: Create a sustainable transportation system, complimented by a mix of land uses, that emphasizes walking, bicycling, use of public transportation and other methods to reduce GHG emissions and the use of single occupancy motor vehicles.

Program T1.16.2: Consider marketing strategies, such as a recurring Palo Alto Open Streets program of events potentially in coordination with local business groups, which would include street closures and programming.

Policy T-1.19: Provide facilities that encourage and support bicycling and walking. Program T1.19.2: Prioritize investments for enhanced pedestrian access and bicycle use within Palo Alto and to/from surrounding communities, including by incorporating improvements from related City plans, for example the 2012 Palo Alto Bicycle + Pedestrian Transportation Plan and the Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, as amended, into the Capital Improvements Program. Program T1.19.5 Improve amenities such as seating, lighting, bicycle parking, street trees, public art and interpretive stations along bicycle and pedestrian paths and in City parks to encourage walking and cycling and enhance the feeling of safety.

Goal T-6: Provide a safe environment for motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists on Palo Alto streets.

Program T6.4.2 Establish standards and procedures for maintaining safe bicycling routes, including signage for warnings and detours during construction projects.

Additionally, the California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure feasibility study is consistent with the following goals, policies, and programs in the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Land Use and Community Design Element: Goal L-1: A compact and resilient city providing residents and visitors with attractive neighborhoods, work places, shopping districts, public facilities and open spaces.

Policy L-1.1: Maintain and prioritize Palo Alto’s varied residential neighborhoods while sustaining the vitality of its commercial areas and public facilities.

Goal L-4: Inviting pedestrian scale centers that offer a variety of retail and commercial services and provide focal points and community gathering places for the city’s residential neighborhoods and employment districts.

Policy L-4.1: Encourage the upgrading and revitalization of selected Centers in a manner that is compatible with the character of surrounding neighborhoods, without loss of retail and existing small, local businesses.

9

Packet Pg. 213


Policy L-4.2: Preserve ground-floor retail, limit the displacement of existing retail from neighborhood centers and explore opportunities to expand retail. Program L4.2.1: Study the overall viability of ground-floor retail requirements in preserving retail space and creating an active street environment, including the types of locations where such requirements are most effective. Program L4.2.2: Evaluate the effectiveness of formula retail limits adopted for California Avenue. Develop incentives for local small businesses where warranted. Program L4.2.3: Explore and potentially support new, creative and innovative retail in Palo Alto. Policy L-4.3: Encourage street frontages that contribute to retail vitality in all Centers. Reinforce street corners in a way that enhances the pedestrian realm or that form corner plazas. Include trees and landscaping. Policy L-4.4: Ensure all Regional Centers and Multi-Neighborhood Centers provide centrally located gathering spaces that create a sense of identity and encourage economic revitalization. Encourage public amenities such as benches, street trees, kiosks, restrooms and public art. Program L4.4.1: Study the feasibility of using public and private funds to provide and maintain landscaping and public spaces such as parks, plazas, sidewalks and public art within commercial areas. Program L4.4.3: Collaborate with merchants to enhance the appearance of streets and sidewalks within all Centers. Encourage the formation of business improvement districts and undertake a proactive program of maintenance, repair, landscaping and enhancement. Policy L-4.5: Support local-serving retail, recognizing that it provides opportunities for local employment, reduced commute times, stronger community connections and neighborhood orientation. Program L4.5.1: Revise zoning and other regulations as needed to encourage the preservation of space to accommodate small businesses, start-ups and other services. Policy L-4.10: Maintain the existing scale, character and function of the California Avenue business district as a shopping, service and office center intermediate in function and scale between Downtown and the smaller neighborhood business areas.

9

Packet Pg. 214


Goal L-8: Attractive and safe parks, civic and cultural facilities provided in all neighborhoods and maintained and used in ways that foster and enrich public life

Policy L-8.6: Seek potential new sites for art and cultural facilities, public spaces, open space and community gardens.

Goal L-9: Attractive, inviting public spaces and streets that enhance the image and character of the city.

Policy L-9.4: Maintain and enhance existing public gathering places and open spaces and integrate new public spaces at a variety of scales. Policy L-9.5: Encourage use of data-driven, innovative design methods and tactics and use data to understand to evaluate how different community members use public space. Policy L-9.6: Create, preserve and enhance parks and publicly accessible, shared outdoor gathering spaces within walking and biking distance of residential neighborhoods. Policy L-9.7 Strengthen the identity of important community-wide gateways, including the entrances to the City at Highway 101, El Camino Real and Middlefield Road; the Caltrain stations; entries to commercial districts; Embarcadero Road at El Camino Real and between Palo Alto and Stanford.

Stakeholder Engagement South Palo Alto Bikeways The South Palo Alto Bikeways project Phase 1 community engagement aimed to identify, inform, and provide opportunities to interact with the community about the project background, existing conditions, and potential improvements. Key stakeholders include:

• City departments

• City Advisory Committees

• City community facilities including Cubberley Center users, Mitchell Park Library and Community Center users, and Mitchell Park field users

• Palo Alto Unified School District staff and school board

• Palo Alto Neighborhood Associations

• Nearby residents

• Nearby businesses

• Nearby schools including school staff, parents, students, and Parents Teachers Associations

• Advocacy groups including Canopy, Carbon Free Palo Alto, Palo Alto Forward, and Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition

9

Packet Pg. 215


• Non-profit organizations including Ability Path, Avenidas, Magical Bridge Foundation, Palo Alto Community Child Care, and Youth Community Service

• Stanford University

• Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority A variety of materials and methods were deployed in May and June 2021. A detailed list of engagement efforts can be found in Table 2 below.

9

Packet Pg. 216


Table 2: Phase 1 Community Engagement Materials and Methods

Material/Event Distribution Date/Event

Date Brief Description

Project Webpage

(English)

April 28, 2021 - Present • To provide the most up to date

information including project

requirements, event recordings, and

next steps

• Approx. 743 viewed

Email Blasts

(English)

Throughout • To inform the community about

different options to provide feedback

and encourage participation in

upcoming events

• Mailers: Approx. 3500 were sent to

properties within 1000 ft of the

project corridors

• Doorhangers: Approx. 150 were hung

at properties that fronted the project

corridors

• Flyers: Approx. 300 were dropped at

Mitchell Park Library and Community

Center, JCC, and businesses

• Posters: Approx. 15 were posted on

store fronts

Facebook Posts

(English)

April 28, 2021, May 12,

2021, and May 24, 2021

Instagram Posts

(English)

April 28, 2021, May 12,

2021, and May 24, 2021

Twitter Posts

(English)

April 28, 2021, May 12,

2021, and May 24, 2021

NextDoor Posts

(English)

April 28, 2021 and May 20,

2021

Mailers

(English, Spanish,

Chinese)

May 3, 2021

Doorhangers

(English, Spanish,

Chinese)

May 3, 2021

Flyers

(English, Spanish,

Chinese)

May 3, 2021

Posters

(English, Spanish,

Chinese)

May 3, 2021

Online Survey

(English, Spanish,

Chinese)

May 13, 2021 – May 31,

2021 • To provide a convenient and

accessible platform for participants to

learn about the project and provide

feedback

• 258 responded

9

Packet Pg. 217




Introductory Webinar

(English, Spanish)

May 13, 2021, 6:30pm –

7:30pm • To introduce the project as well as all

project engagement activities

• 31 attended

• Approx. 57 viewed on YouTube in

English

School Communities

Meeting

(English)

May 19, 2021, 5:00pm –

6:00pm • A focused meeting with school

communities’ representatives to

understand how to better design for

their needs

• 7 attended

City School

Transportation Safety

Committee Meeting

(English)

May 20, 2021, 10:00am –

11:00am • A focused meeting with school

communities’ representatives to

understand how to better design for

their needs

• 4 attended

Virtual Route Tour #1

Webinar

(English, Spanish)

May 22, 2021, 11:00am –

12:30pm • To guide participants through the

project corridors and provide

explanation of potential

improvements

• 10 attended


English


Spanish

Virtual Route Tour #2

Webinar

(English, Spanish)

May 27, 2021, 6:30pm –

8:00pm • To guide participants through the

project corridors and provide

explanation of potential

improvements

• 13 attended


English


Spanish

Pedestrian and

Bicycle Advisory

Committee Meeting

(English)

June 1, 2021, 6:30pm –

8:00pm • A focused meeting with our

pedestrian and bicycle citizen experts

to discuss potential improvements

• Approx. 16 attended

9

Packet Pg. 218




Engagement

Summary Webinar

(English, Spanish)

June 22, 2021, 6:30pm –

8:00pm • To share community feedback

received through previous events and

the online survey

• 15 attended


English


Spanish

* Note: Total number of attendees exclude staff and consultant attendance.

Image: Snapshot of project doorhanger

Image: Snapshot of project poster

Image: Snapshot of project Twitter post

Image: Snapshot of project Facebook post

9

Packet Pg. 219


California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure Study With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the City Council authorized the creation of a Temporary Outdoor Dining program, including the approval of the temporary closure of portions of California Avenue, University Avenue, and Ramona Street. Uplift Local, a Council-supported effort enabling outdoor dining, retail, personal services, and outdoor gyms and fitness options in business districts such as California Avenue and the downtown core and other business areas throughout Palo Alto was created. A dedicated Uplift Local website provided information to the community. This program continues to evolve based on business and community input. Staff has been meeting with the community regularly to seek feedback from the business owners and residents to address concerns associated with outdoor dining program and street closures. While there are fewer retailers in the Cal Ave closure, retailers within and around the closure report challenges they attribute to the closure. Palo Alto residents continue to support continuation of the street closures. As noted in the staff report on February 28, during the study of the feasibility of permanent closure, additional stakeholder outreach will be necessary. Environmental Review South Palo Alto Bikeways No environmental review is necessary for discussion of the Bikeways grant disposition. The project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and these assessments will be done as the project moves forward. California Avenue and Ramona Street Closure Study The proposed action is part of a planning study for a possible future action, which has not been approved, adopted, or funded and is therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262. The future decision to approve the construction would be subject to CEQA and require the preparation of an environmental analysis. Environmental review and project design will be performed in the subsequent steps of the project development.

9

Packet Pg. 220




Title: Adoption of an Interim Ordinance Establishing Objective Urban Lot Split Standards and Further Refinements to SB 9 Development Standards; Authorizing the Public Works Director to Publish Objective Standards Regarding Adjacent Improvements Related to SB 9 Projects; and Direction Regarding Listing Properties Eligible for Historic Status.

From: City Manager


Recommended Motion Staff recommends that Council consider the following motion:

1. Review and adopt proposed objective standards for urban lot splits; these standards will only apply to qualifying SB 9 projects within Palo Alto (Attachment A).

2. Adopt Interim Ordinance Refining SB 9 Regulations and Authorizing the Public Works Director to Publish Objective Standards Regarding Adjacent Public Improvements Related to SB 9 Projects (Attachment B).

3. Direct staff to implement Comprehensive Plan Program L7.1.1 to update the City’s historic inventory with properties previously determined eligible for State and National Register.

Executive Summary This report continues work to adapt Palo Alto’s municipal code and associated development review processes to accommodate Senate Bill 9 (SB 9). Council has already adopted an interim ordinance to address some areas of concern while a permanent ordinance is drafted later this year. In advance of the permanent ordinance, staff have drafted objective subdivision standards for urban lot splits (Attachment A). The development of these standards and their adoption by the City Council is contemplated and referenced in the existing ordinance adopted last December. Local implementation of SB 9 to date has revealed some additional gaps and the need to identify and document objective standards related to adjacent public improvements. Adjacent public improvements include curb cuts, roadways, and other improvements necessitated by and related to private development that typically occur within or directly intersect public property (roads, curb lawn, sidewalk, etc.). Staff recommend amending the ordinance so that

10

Packet Pg. 221


the Director of Public Works can promulgate such objective standards and so they can be incorporated into the code by reference (Attachment B). Also included are some minor clarifying amendments to better align with state law. This report also discusses in greater detail efforts the City may undertake to offer further protection for historic resources, preventing the application of SB 9 to these projects; thereby limiting the risk of demolition or significant alteration of historic resources. The report discusses the strategy to enhance protection as well as the resources required to undertake and complete this work.

Background On December 6, 2021, City Council adopted an urgency ordinance and continued its consideration of an interim ordinance to January. On January 10, 2022, Council approved the interim ordinance. Both the urgency and interim ordiannces seek to adapt Palo Alto’s municipal code and processes to receive and process applications under SB 9 as prescribed in state law. Attachment C contains the languge of SB 9. The remainder of the background section contains information regarding SB 9 as it pertains to urban lot splits and historic resources. The discussion section details how staff propose to create local programs that align with SB 9 and Palo Alto’s development interests. Portions of the Background section serve as a refresher, and are duplicative of previous reports. They are provided for the convenience of the Council and public. Ministerial Urban Lot Splits (Government Code Section 66411.7) Under SB 9, local agencies must ministerially approve, without discretionary review or hearing, certain urban lot splits. To qualify for ministerial approval under SB 9, the parcel to be split must be in a single-family residential zone, which in Palo Alto are the R1 and RE zones. The parcel map for the urban lot split must meet the following requirements:

• Location. The project must be in an urbanized area or urban cluster, or within a city with boundaries in an urbanized area or urban cluster, as those terms are defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. The project cannot be on the site of a designated local or state historic landmark or within a local or state historic district. The project may not be on prime agricultural land, wetlands, or protected species habitat, but may be in a high or very high fire severity hazard zone, earthquake fault zone, floodplain, floodway, and site with hazardous materials so long as certain mitigation measures (as outlined in Government Code Section 65913.4(a)(6)) have been implemented on those sites.

• Parcel Size. The parcel map must subdivide an existing parcel to create no more than two parcels of approximately equal lot area, with neither resulting parcel exceeding 60 percent of the lot area of the original parcel. Additionally, both newly created parcels must be at least 1,200 square feet (unless the local agency adopts a smaller lot size).

• No Prior SB 9 Lot Split. The parcel to be split may not have been established through a prior SB 9 lot split. Neither the owner nor anyone acting in concert with the owner may have previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an SB 9 lot split.

10

Packet Pg. 222


• Subdivision Map Requirements. The urban lot split must conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, except those that conflict with SB 9 requirements.

• Protected Units. The urban lot split may not result in the demolition or alteration of affordable housing, rent-controlled housing, housing that was withdrawn from the rental market in the last 15 years, or housing occupied by a tenant in the past 3 years.

• Owner-Occupancy Affidavit. The applicant must indicate, by affidavit, the applicant’s intention to reside in one of the units built on either parcel for at least three years. This requirement does not apply if the applicant is a qualified non-profit or community land trust. The City cannot impose any additional requirement related to owner occupancy.

• Residential Uses. Any parcel created via SB 9 must be used for residential purposes and cannot be used for short-term rentals of less than 30 days.

A parcel map application for an urban lot split that meets these criteria and otherwise qualifies for the SB 9's ministerial process is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as is an ordinance implementing these provisions. The provisions of the California Coastal Act of 1976 are applicable to SB 9 urban lot splits; Palo Alto does not have any land located within the State defined coastal zone.

A local agency may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards to an SB 9 urban lot split, so long as those standards do not conflict with the limitations imposed by SB 9 and would not physically preclude the construction of up to two units of at least 800 square feet each. Other urban lot split limitations in SB 9 include:

• Setbacks. A local agency may not require rear and side yard setbacks of more than four feet. No setback may be required for a unit constructed (1) within an existing living area, or (2) in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

• Adjacent or Connected Structures. A local agency may not deny an application for an urban lot split solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures, as long as the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. This is an exception to a local agency’s ability to require four foot setbacks, which was not reflected in the prior interim ordinance. The attached ordinance corrects this oversight.

• Parking Requirements. A local agency may only require one off-street parking space per unit. No parking requirements may be imposed if the parcel is located within (1) one-half mile walking distance of either a statutorily defined high-quality transit corridor or major transit stop, or (2) one block of a car share vehicle. In Palo Alto, a block equals 600 feet.

• Easements, Access, and Dedications. A local agency may require an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split to include easements necessary for the provision of public services and facilities. The local agency may also require that the resulting parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way. The local agency

10

Packet Pg. 223


may not require dedications of rights-of-way or construction of new offsite improvements.

• Number of Units; ADUs and JADUs. Notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code Sections 65852.1, 65852.21, 65852.22, and 65915, a local agency is not required to permit more than two units on any parcel created through the authority in SB 9, inclusive of any accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units.

The standard for denying an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split is the same as for denying an SB 9 two-unit development: The local building official must make a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety, or the physical environment, and there is no feasible method by which to satisfactorily mitigate the adverse impact.

Government Code Section 66452.6 – Subdivision Map Act Amendment Currently, an approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires either 24 months after its approval, or after any additional period permitted by local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 12 months. SB 9 extends the limit on the additional period that may be provided by local ordinance from 12 to 24 months. Where local agencies adopt this change by ordinance, an approved or conditionally approved tentative map would expire up to 48 months after its approval if it received a 24-month extension of approval. Further Protecting Historic Resources Properties with listed historic resources are not eligible for SB 9. This helps provide protection for historic resources throughout the state, including those in Palo Alto. As noted in the prior staff report, however, there are a number of resources eligible for listing on local, state, or national historic registers that are not listed. This vulnerability and possible path forward were described in the December 2021 staff report and Council discussed the topic. In Council’s motion, part B asked that staff “assess and return with…information necessary to update the historic registry.” The Discussion section complies with the request for further information. For reference, the Inventory Update Process proposed is the “Local Inventory Nominations Process” outlined in PAMC Section 18.49.040. This section describes that owners would contact staff, submit Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) completed forms, photos, owner signature page, pay required fees, receive a recommendation from the Historic Resources Board for nomination, followed by Council action on the Consent Calendar. Note that the 165 completed DPR forms for properties determined as National Register Eligible during the 1998-2000 survey are on file with the City and with the State Office of Historic Preservation. However, these properties are not actually listed on the National Register, and 11 of these properties have since been demolished. Staff continues to send, on a yearly basis, completed DPR forms for California Register Eligible properties determined eligible since the

10

Packet Pg. 224


Comprehensive Plan update end of 2017. These properties are not actually listed on the California Register. None of the properties found eligible are protected under the City’s existing historic preservation ordinance, unless they are within a listed historic district.

Discussion Proposed Objective Standards for Urban Lot Splits Council’s adopted ordinance anticipated the adoption of objective standards for lot splits. Section 21.10.040 (e)1 states: “Each parcel shall comply with any objective lot design standards for Urban Lot Splits adopted by the City Council.” If adopted, the objective lot split standards will be combined with the objective design standards and be applicable to SB 9 projects—and only to SB 9 projects. State law gives cities some latitude in designing lot split standards. Among the allowances, local jurisdictions may require “that the parcels [resulting from a lot split] have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way.” With this in mind, staff have evaluated three types of lot splits. When subdividing a lot, the street frontage requirement can largely dictate the way subdivision is designed. There are two standard ways to subdivide a typical singly family lot into two roughly proportional lots: A side-by-side split and a flag lot as shown in Figure 1 below. In addition to these two, SB 9 allows subdivision into a rear and front and connection to the public right of way via an easement. The following describes these three scenarios along with their pros and cons.

1 Section 21.10.040 (e) “Each parcel shall comply with any objective lot design standards for Urban Lot Splits adopted by the City Council.”

10

Packet Pg. 225


Side-by-Side - Example one shows a new lot line near the center of the lot where each lot has roughly the same frontage on the street. Under SB 9 the resulting lots can either be of equal size (50/50) or split 60/40, with one lot being smaller than the other. Under this configuration, resulting primary homes would face the street, mimicking the current typical development pattern in Palo Alto neighborhoods. In addition, the side-by-side allows the continuation of a rear yard pattern; though a detached ADU could be constructed in the rear yards. Nevertheless, it could have less privacy impacts on neighboring properties than the flag lot options. The center split, though, can also be challenging to realize because, in many cases, there may be an existing home on the lot. The new lot line cannot not go through the existing home. The home must be demolished before the subdivision can be approved, as it would violate Building and Fire Codes for a property line to go through an existing home. In addition, this configuration could give rise to long, narrow lots, which can give the appearance of a denser development pattern from the right of way. This gives way to the second and third options, flag lots—with and without easements. Flag Lots – Flag lot subdivisions are currently out of step with local development standards. Prior to SB 9, new flag lots were not allowed in the R-1 zone districts, except in cases where the flag lot protects an historic resource. Now, the City must approve flag lots in the R-1 zone districts if proposed for development under SB 9. While generally disfavored in Palo Alto in the R-1 zones but allowed in other zone districts, flag lot subdivisions do facilitate preservation of some or all of an existing home, which would help

10

Packet Pg. 226


preserve existing housing stock and allow an applicant to pursue a subdivision that wouldn’t by definition require demolition of the existing home. One drawback of the flag lot configurations is that the small sizes of the resulting lots combined with the four-foot rear setbacks mean that new SB 9 homes may be in closer proximity to the rear yards of neighboring properties. In addition, if the rear home is two stories and the front home is one (which may happen if an existing one-story home is preserved); this would be unusual in Palo Alto generally and may create privacy impacts. For applicants, the flag lot—without easement—may reduce the floor area available for development. This is because the “flagpole” reduces the dimensions of the front lot and thereby reduces the developable area. Flag Lot with Easement – The draft lot split standards propose to allow (and require) flag lots created through easements only if the initial lot has a frontage less than 50 feet. This promotes the side-by-side and flag lot options as superior. In addition, under the easement option, the width of the flag is reduced to the minimum required for vehicular access to the rear property; this is 10 feet. This process also has additional steps in the recordation process to ensure that the easement is appropriately memorialized. In summary, the lot split standards propose to allow all subdivision types, though certain conditions are required:

• Side-by-side split – Allowed in all situations

• Flag lot – Allowed in all situations

• Flag lot with easement – Allowed (and required) only on lots less than 50’ wide. Preferred Development Pattern SB 9 is a very new law and much remains untested. At this time, Council may wish to adopt the proposed standards, have the recommending bodies and staff collaborate on permenent policies, and take information regarding actual applications into consideration when the permanent ordinance is reviewed later this year. Or, Council may prefer to communicate a preferred lot development pattern at this time. Council may wish to discourage the side-by-side split option in order to preserve wider lots as the predominant development pattern in Palo Alto. To preserve wider lots, the City could require a minimum frontage of 30’ under SB 9 for the side-by-side split option to be available. Any lot split that would result in a lot with less than 30’ of street frontage would need to avail itself of the flag lot option. Establishing a minimum lot width of 30’ (as opposed to the current standard 60’) would mean that, in cases where space was insufficient to split near the center, the applicant would pursue either of the flag lot options. The greatest downside to this minimum frontage is that it may

10

Packet Pg. 227


lead to more flag lots, which may lead to more homes built in the rear, and thus with greater adjacencies to neighboring yards. Lots that can choose the side-by-side option would result in longer and narrower lots than typically allowed by today’s lot standards. While longer and narrower, it is easier for an applicant to leave a back yard because both lots have buildable area closer to the street. Conversely, Council may wish to discourage flat lots. In this context, flag lots would only be permitted on narrow lots. For example, lots that are less than 50’ wide (or another width). This would encourage use of the side-by-side choice. If Council has no preference between the lot split options, no change is needed to the staff recommendation. If Council prefers to require a minimum of 30’ of lot street frontage, that can be added to the lot split standards. Further Shaping of Lots A number of other standards are proposed to shape the resulting lots and homes on the lots. These are available for Council consideration in Attachment A. Historic Preservation Unless historic resources are listed on the local inventory or the state and national registers, including listed historic districts, they are not protected from demolition under SB 9. In order to protect more resources already deemed eligible for State or national registers, the City could act to ensure that eligible properties become listed on the local Inventory of historic resources. Council will need to (1) direct staff and the Historic Resources Board to undertake this work in the upcoming or future work plan and (2) appropriate resources for consultant support to carry out the requisite research and project management. This would serve to implement Comprehensive Plan program L7.1.1. The program states that the City shall: “Update and maintain the City’s Historic Resources Inventory to include historic resources that are eligible for local, State, or federal listing. Historic resources may consist of a single building or structure or a district.” Without qualified historic preservation professionals on staff, PDS would need to contract for this work. In addition, given the constraints on staffing and this project being non-revenue backed (not paid for by permit fees), the City will need contract project management as well. The consultant resources would perform necessary analysis, outreach to property owners, and prepare materials for the HRB and Council to place the properties on the City’s local inventory. This process is described in the background section. Staff estimate the cost of the consultant services to be approximately $50,000; though this estimate must be finalized. Public Works Objective Standards Since the adoption of the interim ordinances, staff have recognized a need to thoroughly address adjacent public improvements. Adjacent public improvements include curb cuts,

10

Packet Pg. 228


roadways, and other improvements related to private development that typically occur within or directly intersect public property (roads, curb lawn, sidewalk, etc.) that the builder of a new home must provide. Staff recommend amending the ordinance so that the Director of Public Works can promulgate such standards and so they can be incorporated into the code by reference (Attachment B). While there are typical standards for adjacent public improvements applied by the Public Works Department to a range of development projects, they are not documented and applied in such a way to be considered objective standards. Therefore, it is not possible to impose the standards on SB 9 projects and keep the projects ministerial. Similar to the development of lot split standards, staff recommend adding language to the regular ordinance allowing the Director of Public Works to promulgate objective adjacent public improvement standards. Examples of standards include allowable curb cuts, distances between curb cuts for driveways, reconstruction of sidewalk and/or curb lawns. Specifying these in objective ways will ensure that SB 9 projects are better connected into the neighborhood fabric.

Policy Implications & Resource Impact The primary policy implications for these recommendations are described in the discussion section. Overall, further refinement of the lot split standards will occur through the Planning and Transportation Commission’s deliberation and ultimate recommendation. This discussion, coupled with a few months of experience processing applications, will ensure that the revised permanent ordanince addresses policy implications that have been identified as well as those that have yet to be identified. The historic reosurce protection strategy will require additional resources. While the consultant resources will amplify the City’s ability to pursue the project oversight of the consultant, communication with property owners, and work with the HRC and Council will require significant staff time. This will detract from other already identified Council proirities. If Council asks staff to move forward with this work item, Council will identify other assignments that will be delayed. In this way, the resource impact has policy implications, primarily that other policy work will not occur as quickly. The development of the adjacent public improvement standards will require staff time, but will not require consultant dollars. Public Works staff remain under similar staff challenges as PDS, with a number of vacancies in key roles supporting the development of these standards and processing of permit applications. Nevertheless, since standards already exist—they are simply not objective—the process to reframe and adjust these standards may not add a significant workload to staff.

Timeline Adoption of the lot split standards will take affect immediately, as they are already referenced

10

Packet Pg. 229


in the ordinace. Until adopted, the standards cannot be applied to projects. The historic resource protection work can be undertaken after allocation of budget and successful execution of a contract with a qualified historic resource firm with appropriate project management resources. The adjacent public improvement standards can be developed and become active upon their approvel by the Director of the Department of Public Works.

Stakeholder Engagement The lot split and adjacent public improvement standards, similar to the prior ordinances, did not have the benefit of public engagement because the City is rapidly responding to newly adopted and effective state laws. The more robust development of the permanent ordinance will include outreach with a variety of local stakeholders, including residents and design professionals. To ensure the City’s preferences are protected in the immediate future, staff recommend adoption of standards and amendment of the ordinance to allow creation of adjacent public improvement standards. The historic preservation component benefited from the input of the Historic Resources Board as well as any public comments that occurred during the public hearing. In addition to the members of the public, two council members attended the HRB retreat as well. If approved for the work plan, the item will also be considered again by Council as will the funding of the appropriation. Each of these decision points provides additional opportunities for public comments.

Environmental Review The proposals are not projects as defined by the California Environmental Resources Act.

Resource Impact Funding for work related to updating the historic resources inventory in FY 22 is within budgeted levels adopted by the City Council; no additional funding is requested at this time. However, if there are any additional costs in FY 23, staff may return with a funding request to complete this work. The total cost is not expected to exceed $50,000. Attachments:

• Attachment10.a: Attachment A: Urban Lot Split Objective Standards

• Attachment10.b: Attachment B Ordinance Modifying Ch 18.42 and Ch 21.10 to Further Implement SB9

• Attachment10.c: Attachment C: SB 9 Summary

10

Packet Pg. 230

ATTACHMENT A

PROPOSED OBJECTIVE LOT DESIGN STANDARDS

Proposed Objective Lot Design Standards:

a. Lot Typologies

(1) Side-by-side. One lot line shall divide the property from front to rear, with street frontages for both lots. (2) Flag Lot. Two property lines shall divide the property to create a new flag lot. The “flagpole” shall be at least 15 feet wide. (3) Flag Lot with Easement. Substandard lots less than 50 feet in width shall create a 10-foot access easement to create access to the rear lot. (b) Development Standards

Side-by-Side Lots Flag Lot

Lot Split on lot less than 50 feet in

width

Configuration All lots shall meet one of the three typologies as described in

(a)

Flag lot configuration required on lots deeper

than 200 ft

Typology (a) (3) only

Minimum Lot Size (sq. ft.)

1,200

Maximum Lot Size None

10.a

Packet Pg. 231

Maximum Lot Split Ratio

60%/40%

Minimum Street Frontage (ft)

25

15 Easement

Maximum Number of New Lot Lines

2 (1)

Shared Driveway Required (2) (3)

(1) One property line may be used to divide an existing lot into two side-by-side lots. Two property lines may be used to create a flag lot. No more than two new lot lines may be added.

The new lot lines, as far as practicable, shall be parallel or at right angles to straight

streets or radial to curved streets.

(2) A shared driveway shall be comprised of a single curb cut that extends for at least 10 ft before branching to two or more parking spaces. A recorded access easement is required. (3) The two lots shall share a single driveway, unless sharing a driveway would require demolition of existing structures proposed to be retained. If sharing a driveway would require such demolition, no more than 2 curb cuts, one per each lot, will be permitted. The curb cuts must be at least 20’ apart per 12.08.060 (a) (9) (A); drive aisle dimensions per 18.54.070 table 6.

10.a

Packet Pg. 232

NOT YET ADOPTED

1 0160067_20220309_ay16

Ordinance No. ______

Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Modifying Chapters 18.42 (Standard for Special Uses) and 21.10 (Parcel Maps for Urban Lot Splits) of the

Palo Alto Municipal Code to Further Implement Senate Bill 9 The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), which requires, among other things, that local agencies ministerially approve both two-unit construction and urban lot splits on single-family zoned lots.

B. SB 9 authorizes the creation of lots as small as 1,200 square feet and requires approval of two residential units of at least 800 square feet (for a total of 1,600 square feet) each on such lots. This represents a significant departure from existing minimum lot sizes and development standards in Palo Alto’s single-family zones.

C. SB 9 authorizes local jurisdictions to apply objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, subject to certain limitations in statute.

D. On January 24, 2022, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 5542.

E. The City Council now desires to modify Interim Ordinance No. 5542 to clarify its terms and to adopt additional standards for lot splits.

F. There is insufficient time for consideration of and recommendation on objective standards related to SB 9 by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) prior to action by the City Council. The Council therefore declares that an interim ordinance, pursuant to Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 18.80.090 is an appropriate measure to adopt standards, pending consideration of a permanent ordinance by the PTC.

SECTION 2. Section 18.42.180 (Interim Standards for Two Units on Single Family Zoned Lots Pursuant to Senate Bill 9) of Chapter 18.42 (Standards for Special Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 18.42.180 Interim Standards for Two Units on Single Family Zoned Lots Pursuant to Senate Bill 9. [. . .]

10.b

Packet Pg. 233

NOT YET ADOPTED

2 0160067_20220309_ay16

(e) Development Standards.

(1) A project proposing two dwelling units on a parcel in the R-1 or RE districts shall be subject to the development standards set forth in Chapters 18.12 and 18.10, respectively except as provided herein.

(2) All construction pursuant to this section shall comply with objective design standards adopted by the City Council. However, an applicant seeking to deviate from the objective design standards (except to the extent necessary to construct a unit of 800 square feet) may elect to submit an application under the base requirements of Chapters 18.10, or 18.12, including, if applicable, Single Family Individual Review.

(3) If the application of any development standard or design standard would necessarily require that one or more proposed units be less than 800 square feet, such standard shall be relaxed to the minimum extent necessary to allow construction of a unit or units of at least 800 square feet. The Director may publish regulations governing the order in which objective standards shall be waived or relaxed in such circumstances.

(4) Setbacks from side and rear property lines, including street-side property lines, shall be no less than four feet, except in the case of existing non-complying structures or structures reconstructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure, in which case existing setbacks less than four feet may be maintained. No setback is required from an internal lot line newly created pursuant to Chapter 21.10, for adjacent or connected structures separated by the new lot line, provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.

(5) Off-street parking shall be provided pursuant to Chapters 18.52 and 18.54. (6) In the event that a project is proposed on a site that has been subject to an

Urban Lot Split under Chapter 21.10, and the project would result in three or more detached units across the two parcels created by the urban lot split, any new units shall not exceed 800 square feet.

(7) Accessory structures, such as garages and shed are permitted consistent with the provisions of the zoning district; however, no accessory structure shall have a floor area exceeding 500 square feet.

[. . .] SECTION 3. Sections 21.10.030 (Applicability), 21.10.040 (General Requirements), and 21.10.050 (Application and Review of an Urban Lot Split) of Chapter 21.10 (Urban Lot Splits) of Title 21 (Subdivisions and Other Divisions of land) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code are amended to read as follows: 21.10.030 Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply only to lots in the R-1 district (and R-1 subdistricts) or R-E zone district. Except as modified by this Chapter, all provisions of Title 21 shall apply to an

10.b

Packet Pg. 234

NOT YET ADOPTED

3 0160067_20220309_ay16

application for urban lot split. An urban lot split is not available in any of the following circumstances:

[. . .] Section 21.10.040 General Requirements

(a) The minimum size for a parcel created by an Urban Lot Split is 1,200 square feet. (b) The lots created by an Urban Lot Split must be of approximately equal area, such that no

resulting parcel shall be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.

(c) Each parcel created by an Urban Lot Split shall adjoin the public right of way by means of a minimum fifteen foot street frontage.

(c) (d) Where existing dwelling units on the property are to remain, no lot line may be created under this Chapter in a manner that would bisect any structure or that would result in more than two dwelling units on any resulting parcel.

(d) (e) Newly created lot lines shall not render an existing structure noncomplying in any respect (e.g. floor area ratio, lot coverage, parking), nor increase the degree of noncompliance of an existing noncompliant structure.

(e) (f) Each parcel shall comply with any objective lot design standards for Urban Lot Splits adopted by the City Council.

(f) The Director of Public Works may promulgate standards for adjacent public improvements, such as curb cuts and sidewalks, in relation to an urban lot split.

(g) Utility easements shall be shown on the parcel map, and recorded prior to, or concurrent with final parcel map recordation.

(h) A covenant necessary for maintenance of stormwater treatment facilities shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with final map recordation.

(i) Existing driveways to be demolished shall follow the procedure(s) in 12.08.090 Elimination of abandoned driveway.

(j) A maintenance agreement shall be recorded to ensure shared maintenance of any shared access easements, stormwater treatment, landscaping and private utilities, prior to final parcel map recordation. The Director of Planning shall determine the appropriate fee required for an application for parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, which may be the fee currently established for a Preliminary Parcel Map or Parcel Map.

Section 21.10.050 Application and Review of an Urban Lot Split

(a) The director of planning is authorized to promulgate regulations, forms, and/or checklists setting forth application requirements for a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split under this Chapter. An application shall include an affidavit from the property owner, signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of California, that:

(1) The proposed urban lot split would not require or authorize demolition or alteration of any of the housing described in Section 21.10.030, subdivision (e).

(2) The proposed urban lot split is not on a parcel described in Section 21.10.030.

10.b

Packet Pg. 235

NOT YET ADOPTED

4 0160067_20220309_ay16

(3) The owner intends to occupy one of the housing units located on a lot created by the parcel map as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the recording of the parcel map.

(4) The rental of any unit on the property shall be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.

(5) The resulting lots will be for residential uses only. (b) A parcel map for an Urban Lot Split must be prepared by a registered civil engineer or

licensed land surveyor in accordance with Government Code sections 66444 – 66450 and this Chapter. Unless more specific regulations are adopted by the director of planning, the parcel map shall be in the form and include all of the information required of a Preliminary Parcel Map by Chapter 21.12, as well as any additional information required of a Parcel Map by Chapter 21.16. In addition, the face of the Parcel Map shall contain a declaration that:

(1) Each lot created by the parcel map shall be used solely for residential dwellings. (2) That no more than two dwelling units may be permitted on each lot. (3) That rental of any dwelling unit on a lot created by the parcel map shall be for a

term longer than 30 consecutive days. (4) A lot created by a parcel map under this Chapter shall not be further subdivided.

(c) Upon receipt of a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, the director of planning shall transmit copies to the city engineer, chief building official, director of utilities, chief of police, fire chief, director of transportation, and such other departments of the city, and any other agencies, as may be required by law or deemed appropriate.

(d) The director of planning shall cause a notice of the pending application to be posted at the site of the proposed Urban Lot Split and for notice to be mailed to owners and residents of property within 600 feet of the property.

(e) The director of planning shall ministerially review and approve a parcel map for Urban Lot Split if they determine that the parcel map application meets all requirements of this Chapter. The director of planning shall deny a parcel map application that does not meet any requirement of this Chapter.

(f) The Director of Planning shall determine the appropriate fee required for an application for parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, which may be the fee currently established for a Preliminary Parcel Map or Parcel Map.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the following reasons. Under Government Code Sections 66411.7(n) and 65852.21(j), an ordinance adopted to implement the requirements of SB 9 shall not be considered a project under CEQA.

10.b

Packet Pg. 236

NOT YET ADOPTED

5 0160067_20220309_ay16

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ____________________________ ____________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager ____________________________ Director of Planning and Development Services

10.b

Packet Pg. 237

SB 9 Summary

SB 9 (Atkins) Housing Development

This bill:

1) Requires a city to ministerially approve either or both of the following, as specified:

a. A housing development of no more than two units (Two-Family as defined in Palo

Alto Zoning Code but commonly referred to as “duplex”) in a single-family zone.

b. The subdivision of a parcel zoned for residential use, into two approximately equal

parcels (lot split), as specified.

2) Requires that a development or parcel to be subdivided must be located within an

urbanized area or urban cluster and prohibits it from being located on any of the

following:

a. Prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance;

b. Wetlands;

c. Land within the very high fire hazard severity zone, unless the development

complies with state mitigation requirements;

d. A hazardous waste site;

e. An earthquake fault zone;

f. Land within the 100-year floodplain or a floodway;

g. Land identified for conservation under a natural community conservation plan, or

lands under conservation easement;

h. Habitat for protected species; or

i. A site located within a historic or landmark district, or a site that has a historic

property or landmark under state or local law, as specified.

3) Prohibits demolition or alteration of an existing unit of rent-restricted housing, housing

that has been the subject of an Ellis Act eviction within the past 15 years, or that has been

occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

4) Prohibits demolition of more than 25% of the exterior walls of an existing structure unless

the local ordinance allows greater demolition or if the site has not been occupied by a

tenant in the last three years.

5) Authorizes a city to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design review standards

that do not conflict with this bill, except:

a. A city shall not impose objective standards that would physically preclude the

construction of up to two units or that would physically preclude either of the two

units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. A city may, however,

require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines.

10.c

Packet Pg. 238

SB 9 Summary

b. A city shall not require a setback for an existing structure or a structure

constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as the existing

structure.

6) Prohibits a city from requiring more than one parking space per unit for either a proposed

duplex or a proposed lot split. Prohibits a city from imposing any parking requirements if

the parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit

corridor or a major transit stop, or if there is a car share vehicle located within one block

of the parcel.

7) Authorizes a local agency to deny a housing project otherwise authorized by this bill if the

building official makes a written finding based upon the preponderance of the evidence

that the housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon health

and safety or the physical environment and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily

mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.

8) Requires a city to prohibit rentals of less than 30 days.

9) Prohibits a city from rejecting an application solely because it proposes adjacent or

connected structures, provided the structures meet building code safety standards and

are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.

10) Provides that a city shall not be required to permit an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) or

junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) in addition to units approved under this bill.

11) Requires a city to include the number of units constructed and the number of applications

for lot splits under this bill, in its annual progress report (APR).

12) Requires a city to ministerially approve a parcel map for a lot split only if the local agency

determines that the parcel map for the urban lot split meets the following requirements,

in addition to the requirements for eligible parcels that apply to both duplex and lot splits:

a. The parcel map subdivides an existing parcel to create no more than two new

parcels of approximately equal size, provided that one parcel shall not be smaller

than 40% of the lot area of the original parcel.

b. Both newly created parcels are at least 1,200 square feet, unless the city adopts a

small minimum lot size by ordinance.

c. The parcel does not contain rent-restricted housing, housing where an owner has

exercised their rights under the Ellis Act within the past 15 years or has been

occupied by tenants in the past three years.

d. The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an urban lot split.

e. Neither the owner of the parcel, or any person acting in concert with the owner,

has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split.

10.c

Packet Pg. 239

SB 9 Summary

13) Requires a city to approve a lot split if it conforms to all applicable objective requirements

of the Subdivision Map Act not except as otherwise expressly provided in this bill.

Prohibits a city from imposing regulations that require dedicated rights-of-way or the

construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created, as a condition of

approval.

14) Authorizes a city to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards,

and objective design review standards that do not conflict with this bill. A city may,

however, require easements or that the parcel have access to, provide access to, or adjoin

the public right-of-way.

15) Provides that a local government shall not be required to permit more than two units on

a parcel.

16) Prohibits a city from requiring, as a condition for ministerial approval of a lot split, the

correction of nonconforming zoning conditions.

17) Requires a local government to require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an

affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their

principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of lot split,

unless the applicant is a community land trust, as defined, or a qualified nonprofit

corporation, as defined.

18) Provides that no additional owner occupancy standards may be imposed other than those

contained within 17) above, and that requirement expires after five years.

19) Allows a city to adopt an ordinance to implement the urban lot split requirements and

duplex provisions and provides that those ordinances are not a project under California

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

20) Allows a city to extend the life of subdivision maps by one year, up to a total of four years.

10.c

Packet Pg. 240


Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 3/21/2022


Summary Title: Supplemental Report - HE Housing Sites

Title: Approve the Housing Element Working Group and Planning and Transportation Commission Recommendations for the 2023-31 Housing Element Sites and Their Associated Unit Yields as Well as Potential Feedback on Housing Element Policies and Programs, or Other Housing-Related Direction to Staff.

From: City Manager


Summary: On March 21, 2022, staff will be presenting the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC)

recommendations on the 2023-31 Housing Element Update sites selection for City Council

consideration. Staff continues to work on the staff report for this item, which will go out in a

late packet on March 17.

The PTC recently concluded its recommendations for the proposed strategies and sites for the

2023-31 Housing Element update. The City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the

2023-31 planning period is 6,086 units. The Housing Element Working Group (Working Group)

approved recommendations to the PTC for strategies and sites that yield close to 7,000 units.

For the most part, the PTC followed the recommendations of the Housing Element Working

(Working Group) with the following exceptions:

1. Included City-Owned Parking lots as a site selection strategy.

2. Increased the unit yield of the identified Stanford Transit Center site.

With these additional PTC recommendations, more than 7,000 units have been identified to

meet the City’s RHNA. Table 1 provides a summary of the Working Group and PTC

recommendations.

11

Packet Pg. 241


In advance of the late packet Council report, the public and Councilmembers may want to

review information previously transmitted to the PTC:

February 23, 2022 PTC staff report (duplicate of 02/09/22 report):

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-

minutes/planning-and-transportation-commission/2022/ptc-02.23.2022-he-sites-selection.pdf

February 9, 2022 PTC meeting video:

https://midpenmedia.org/planning-transportation-commission-63-292022/

February 23, 2022 PTC meeting video:


11

Packet Pg. 242

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/planning-and-transportation-commission/2022/ptc-02.23.2022-he-sites-selection.pdf

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/planning-and-transportation-commission/2022/ptc-02.23.2022-he-sites-selection.pdf




Table 1: Site Selection Recommendations from Working Group and PTC

Note: The unit yields reflected in table may continue to be adjusted based on changes in

applications received and new information learned. Highlighted figures reflect updates since the

Working Group meeting, see associated note in table.

WORKING GROUP

January 13, 2022

PTC

February 23, 2022 NOTES

RHNA Allocation 6,086 6,086

Those strategies marked with an asterisk (*)

denote additional PTC recommendations.

No Net Loss Buffer +609 +609

Total Units Required 6,695 6,695

Strategy Unit Yield NOTES

Pipeline Units

565 565

This number is fluid and modified as

additional applications received. One

application was received after PTC

approval.

ADUs 512 512

MFA 461 457 Two small sites and its associated yield of 4

units were administratively removed.

#1 Upzone* 1,657 1,640 One site and its 17 unit yield was

administratively removed.

#2 Caltrain Stations 798 798

#3 Transit Corridor 274 274

#4 Faith Based

Institutions* 148 148

#5 City Owned

Parking Lots* 0 168

The Working Group recommended not to

include City-owned parking lots but the PTC

recommended to include as a strategy.

GM zoned sites* 596 596

ROLM zoned sites* 902 902

Stanford Proposed

Sites

1. Pasteur Dr. 425 425

2. 3128 El Camino

Real 144 144

3. Transit Center* 180 270 The PTC recommended an increased density.

Staff Suggested Sites 183 183 Includes 3300 El Camino Real, 92 units.

Total Unit Yield 6,845 7,086

Difference

(Unit Yield - Units

Required)

150 391

11

Packet Pg. 243


Report Type: Information Reports Meeting Date: 3/21/2022


Summary Title: Condominium Conversion Report

Title: Rental Residential Vacancy Rate Determination for Three Plus Dwelling Units for Calendar Year 2021

From: City Manager


Recommendation: This is an informational report and City Council action is not required.

Executive Summary: This staff report transmits the biannual reporting of the vacancy rates of three or more residential rental units for December 2021. The vacancy rate is 1.13%. When the vacancy rate is less than the 3% threshold, applications to convert residential rental units to ownership units through the subdivision process are not eligible for consideration.

Background: Planning staff prepares the Residential Vacancy Rate Determination Report twice a year to

meet the requirements of Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 21.40.040, Determination of

Vacancy Rate and Surplus. The Section 21.40.0401 states the following:

“In April and November of each year, the director of planning and community

environment shall determine from the city utility meter records the vacancy rate and the

vacancy surplus, if any, within the city limits. New market-priced rental units available to

the general public, for which a certificate of use and occupancy has been issued since the

last vacancy survey, shall be added on a unit-for-unit basis either to reduce the vacancy

deficiency or to increase the vacancy surplus”.

1 Municipal Code Chapter 21.40: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-19994

12

Packet Pg. 244

https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-0-0-19994


All conversions involving a change in the type of ownership of three or more rental units are

subject to the provisions of this chapter. Vacancy surplus in this section of the Municipal Code is

defined as the number of rental units being offered for rent or lease in excess of the 3%

vacancy rate.

No application for consideration of a tentative or preliminary parcel map for a subdivision

created from a conversion may be filed with the city unless there is a vacancy surplus of 3% or

more as of the most recent determination pursuant to Section 21.40.040.

The Planning and Development Services Department has records of tracking the three-plus

units’ rental vacancy rate since 2002. Historically, the vacancy rate varied from 1.2% to 1.9%

except for the December 2020 reporting2.

Discussion: The purpose of this reporting is to seek a reasonable balance of rental and ownership housing

in the city in a variety of individual choices of tenure, type, price, and location of housing. It is

also to protect the supply of multi-family rental housing stock in the city for low- and moderate-

income families, and to reduce and avoid displacement of tenants particularly seniors and

families.

Staff prepares this report using various data sources. As per the directions provided in

Municipal Code Section 21.40.040, staff uses the City of Palo Alto’s utility meter records to

access total number of “active” multi-family apartments. Bureau of the Census American

Community Survey 2010 data is used as a baseline for the total rental stock data in Palo Alto.

Changes (addition or demolition) to the total rental dwelling unit stock is tracked by staff

biannually using City of Palo Alto’s Accela data to generate the vacancy rate.

As noted above, staff typically prepares a report biannually. But for midyear 2021, staff did not

complete this reporting. In 2021, a data reconcilation effort was initiated by Planning and

Development Services Department staff to increase the accuracy of the database. Staff from

Utilities, Information Technology (IT), and Planning & Development Services (PDS) collaborated

to ‘join,’ relate, and refine the Utilities account database to the Geographic Information System

(GIS) database system. In the report produced in March of 2021 for the calendar year 2020, the

data reconciliation work was still in progress and the generated data was less accurate. Since

then, further refinement and quality control in the data set was completed leading to a cleaner

and dependable data set.

Updated Utilities Database

2 See updated database discussion below for details on the 2020 discrepancy in numbers.

12

Packet Pg. 245



In November 2020, the City’s Utility Department upgraded its old data recording system (i.e.

BI). This major system upgrade was necessary to accommodate data storage and software

issues. For this upgrade, some data reconciliation and refinements were made to the old data

recording system, enabling staff to take advantage of data points previously unavailable -

resulting in a more precise dataset relative to the previous year's reporting.

The system upgrade permitted address reconciliation between the Utility accounts database

and the City’s GIS address database. This significant cross-department work effort created a link

between certain attributes or data points in the City’s GIS and the Utility account database. This

‘linkage’ facilitated a more accurate unit count focused on rental multifamily utility accounts

instead of all multifamily accounts, which includes ownership/condominium type and rental

multifamily utility accounts. The collaboration successfully identified most Utility accounts

associated with 3+ rental units; for various reasons, not all accounts could be identified (e.g. GIS

address may not exactly match Utility account addresses on corner lots or address formatting

discrepancies between GIS address and Utility account databases). Staff will continue to

research discrepancies on a case-by-case basis to further enhance both datasets.

During this effort, staff also recognized that a number of 3+ rental housing unit utility accounts

have one utility meter for all rental units (e.g. 657 Everett Middlefield Rd) or individual unit

accounts that were always billed or invoiced to the property manager or owner regardless if the

unit is occupied or vacant (e.g. senior housing apartment units). Some 3+ rental housing units’

individual utility accounts also have been ‘inactive’ or have not had a utility bill for some time. It

is difficult to determine whether the unit associated with the account is vacant or is no longer

available to rent; in other words, ‘taken off the rental market’ altogether. These variations

between the GIS and Utility account datasets help clarify the discrepancy between the

estimated number of 3+ rental housing units (~8,057) and the number of ‘identified’ active

Utility accounts in 3+ rental housing (~5,050).

Latest Vacancy Rate

For the December 2021 data reporting cycle, the multifamily rental vacancy number is 1.13%

percent (based on reconciled data source). This number is significantly lower than previous

years’ reporting but is considered more accurate than the December 2020 reporting cycle as

discussed in the preceding paragraphs.

Table 1: Average Annual Rental Vacancy Rates

Year Estimated Housing Units Estimated Vacancy

Rate (yearly average) Estimated Vacant Units

2015 7,901 1.22% 92

2016 7,912 1.45% 118

2017 7,928 1.58% 131

12

Packet Pg. 246


2018 7,928 1.52% 132

2019 7,931 1.83% 141

2020 8,057 2.8% 226

2021 8,057 1.13% 57

Source: City of Palo Alto Planning and Development Services Department

Policy Implications: This report is prepared as a requirement for Municipal Code 21.40.040.

Resource Impact: Planning staff prepare this report biannually and there are no resource impacts.

Timeline: This informational memo is prepared twice a year for Planning division staff use. The next

report will be prepared in July/August 2022.

12

Packet Pg. 247




Summary Title: Supplemental Report - Objective Urban Lot Split Standards, Standards for Off-Site Improvements

Title: Adoption of an Interim Ordinance Establishing Objective Urban Lot Split Standards and Further Refinements to SB 9 Development Standards; Authorizing the Public Works Director to Publish Objective Standards Regarding Adjacent Improvements Related to SB 9 Projects; and Direction Regarding Listing Properties Eligible for Historic Status.

From: City Manager


Supplemental Report - Item 10

MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, 2021

TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL

FROM: JONATHAN LAIT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING OBJECTIVE

URBAN LOT SPLIT STANDARDS AND FURTHER REFINEMENTS TO SB 9

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS

DIRECTOR TO PUBLISH OBJECTIVE STANDARDS REGARDING ADJACENT

IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO SB 9 PROJECTS; AND DIRECTION

REGARDING LISTING PROPERTIES ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC STATUS.

This memorandum explains staff's proposed modification to Agenda Item 10, Attachment 10.b,

the draft ordinance amending Chapters 18.42 (Standard for Special Uses) and 21.10 (Parcel

13

Packet Pg. 249


Maps for Urban Lot Splits) to implement SB 9.

The initial version of the draft ordinance would amend Section 21.10.040 (General

Requirements) to add paragraphs (f) through (j) as additional requirements for ministerial

approval of an urban lot split for single family lots in an R-1 district (or subdistrict) or R-E

district. Paragraph (f) would allow the Director of Public Works to promulgate standards for

adjacent public improvements, such as curb cuts and sidewalks, in relation to an urban lot split.

After further discussion among staff from Public Works, Planning and Development Services,

and the City Attorney's Office, staff proposes revising the draft ordinance to delete paragraph

(f) from the proposed additions to Section 21.10.040 General Requirements and insert that

language as a new subsection (8) of paragraph (e) of Section 18.42.180 (Interim Standards for

Two Units on Single Family Zoned Lots Pursuant to Senate Bill 9).

The rationale for this revision is that SB9 prohibits the City from imposing "regulations that

require dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels

being created as a condition of issuing a parcel map for an urban lot split." (emphasis added)

However, SB 9 does allow the City to impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision

standards, and objective design review criteria. In other words, while SB 9 limits the City's

discretion in reviewing a proposed urban lot split, it does allow the City to impose additional

objective standards on the development of the resulting lots.

Thus, because urban lot splits may be sought and approved without regard to a specific

development scenario, the specific impacts on adjacent public improvements may not be

known until such time that the property owner proposes a project for approval. The proposed

revision to the draft ordinance allows the Director of Public Works to promulgate development

standards for adjacent public improvements and clarifies that the development standards

would be applied at this later stage, when the project's impacts may be more accurately

evaluated, while also adhering to SB 9’s substantive requirements for ministerial approval of

urban lot splits and development of single family zoned lots.

Attachments:

Attachment13.a: Attachment A: Draft Ordinance (PDF)

13

Packet Pg. 250

NOT YET ADOPTED

1 0160067_20220317_ay16

Ordinance No. ______

Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Modifying Chapters 18.42 (Standard for Special Uses) and 21.10 (Parcel Maps for Urban Lot Splits) of the

Palo Alto Municipal Code to Further Implement Senate Bill 9 The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), which requires, among other things, that local agencies ministerially approve both two-unit construction and urban lot splits on single-family zoned lots.

B. SB 9 authorizes the creation of lots as small as 1,200 square feet and requires approval of two residential units of at least 800 square feet (for a total of 1,600 square feet) each on such lots. This represents a significant departure from existing minimum lot sizes and development standards in Palo Alto’s single-family zones.

C. SB 9 authorizes local jurisdictions to apply objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, subject to certain limitations in statute.

D. On January 24, 2022, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 5542.

E. The City Council now desires to modify Interim Ordinance No. 5542 to clarify its terms and to adopt additional standards for lot splits.

F. There is insufficient time for consideration of and recommendation on objective standards related to SB 9 by the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) prior to action by the City Council. The Council therefore declares that an interim ordinance, pursuant to Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 18.80.090 is an appropriate measure to adopt standards, pending consideration of a permanent ordinance by the PTC.

SECTION 2. Section 18.42.180 (Interim Standards for Two Units on Single Family Zoned Lots Pursuant to Senate Bill 9) of Chapter 18.42 (Standards for Special Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 18.42.180 Interim Standards for Two Units on Single Family Zoned Lots Pursuant to Senate Bill 9. [. . .]

13.a

Packet Pg. 251

NOT YET ADOPTED

2 0160067_20220317_ay16

(e) Development Standards.

(1) A project proposing two dwelling units on a parcel in the R-1 or RE districts shall be subject to the development standards set forth in Chapters 18.12 and 18.10, respectively except as provided herein.

(2) All construction pursuant to this section shall comply with objective design standards adopted by the City Council. However, an applicant seeking to deviate from the objective design standards (except to the extent necessary to construct a unit of 800 square feet) may elect to submit an application under the base requirements of Chapters 18.10, or 18.12, including, if applicable, Single Family Individual Review.

(3) If the application of any development standard or design standard would necessarily require that one or more proposed units be less than 800 square feet, such standard shall be relaxed to the minimum extent necessary to allow construction of a unit or units of at least 800 square feet. The Director may publish regulations governing the order in which objective standards shall be waived or relaxed in such circumstances.

(4) Setbacks from side and rear property lines, including street-side property lines, shall be no less than four feet, except in the case of existing non-complying structures or structures reconstructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure, in which case existing setbacks less than four feet may be maintained. No setback is required from an internal lot line newly created pursuant to Chapter 21.10, for adjacent or connected structures separated by the new lot line, provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.

(5) Off-street parking shall be provided pursuant to Chapters 18.52 and 18.54. (6) In the event that a project is proposed on a site that has been subject to an

Urban Lot Split under Chapter 21.10, and the project would result in three or more detached units across the two parcels created by the urban lot split, any new units shall not exceed 800 square feet.

(7) Accessory structures, such as garages and shed are permitted consistent with the provisions of the zoning district; however, no accessory structure shall have a floor area exceeding 500 square feet.

(8) The Director of Public Works may promulgate standards for adjacent public improvements, such as curb cuts and sidewalks, in relation to development pursuant to this Section.

[. . .] SECTION 3. Sections 21.10.030 (Applicability), 21.10.040 (General Requirements), and 21.10.050 (Application and Review of an Urban Lot Split) of Chapter 21.10 (Urban Lot Splits) of Title 21 (Subdivisions and Other Divisions of land) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code are amended to read as follows:

13.a

Packet Pg. 252

NOT YET ADOPTED

3 0160067_20220317_ay16

21.10.030 Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply only to lots in the R-1 district (and R-1 subdistricts) or R-E zone district. Except as modified by this Chapter, all provisions of Title 21 shall apply to an application for urban lot split. An urban lot split is not available in any of the following circumstances:

[. . .] Section 21.10.040 General Requirements

(a) The minimum size for a parcel created by an Urban Lot Split is 1,200 square feet. (b) The lots created by an Urban Lot Split must be of approximately equal area, such that no

resulting parcel shall be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision.

(c) Each parcel created by an Urban Lot Split shall adjoin the public right of way by means of a minimum fifteen foot street frontage.

(c) (d) Where existing dwelling units on the property are to remain, no lot line may be created under this Chapter in a manner that would bisect any structure or that would result in more than two dwelling units on any resulting parcel.

(d) (e) Newly created lot lines shall not render an existing structure noncomplying in any respect (e.g. floor area ratio, lot coverage, parking), nor increase the degree of noncompliance of an existing noncompliant structure.

(e) (f) Each parcel shall comply with any objective lot design standards for Urban Lot Splits adopted by the City Council.

(f) Utility easements shall be shown on the parcel map, and recorded prior to, or concurrent with final parcel map recordation.

(g) A covenant necessary for maintenance of stormwater treatment facilities shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with final map recordation.

(h) Existing driveways to be demolished shall follow the procedure(s) in 12.08.090 Elimination of abandoned driveway.

(i) A maintenance agreement shall be recorded to ensure shared maintenance of any shared access easements, stormwater treatment, landscaping and private utilities, prior to final parcel map recordation. The Director of Planning shall determine the appropriate fee required for an application for parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, which may be the fee currently established for a Preliminary Parcel Map or Parcel Map.

Section 21.10.050 Application and Review of an Urban Lot Split

(a) The director of planning is authorized to promulgate regulations, forms, and/or checklists setting forth application requirements for a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split under this Chapter. An application shall include an affidavit from the property owner, signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of California, that:

(1) The proposed urban lot split would not require or authorize demolition or alteration of any of the housing described in Section 21.10.030, subdivision (e).

(2) The proposed urban lot split is not on a parcel described in Section 21.10.030.

13.a

Packet Pg. 253

NOT YET ADOPTED

4 0160067_20220317_ay16

(3) The owner intends to occupy one of the housing units located on a lot created by the parcel map as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the recording of the parcel map.

(4) The rental of any unit on the property shall be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.

(5) The resulting lots will be for residential uses only. (b) A parcel map for an Urban Lot Split must be prepared by a registered civil engineer or

licensed land surveyor in accordance with Government Code sections 66444 – 66450 and this Chapter. Unless more specific regulations are adopted by the director of planning, the parcel map shall be in the form and include all of the information required of a Preliminary Parcel Map by Chapter 21.12, as well as any additional information required of a Parcel Map by Chapter 21.16. In addition, the face of the Parcel Map shall contain a declaration that:

(1) Each lot created by the parcel map shall be used solely for residential dwellings. (2) That no more than two dwelling units may be permitted on each lot. (3) That rental of any dwelling unit on a lot created by the parcel map shall be for a

term longer than 30 consecutive days. (4) A lot created by a parcel map under this Chapter shall not be further subdivided.

(c) Upon receipt of a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, the director of planning shall transmit copies to the city engineer, chief building official, director of utilities, chief of police, fire chief, director of transportation, and such other departments of the city, and any other agencies, as may be required by law or deemed appropriate.

(d) The director of planning shall cause a notice of the pending application to be posted at the site of the proposed Urban Lot Split and for notice to be mailed to owners and residents of property within 600 feet of the property.

(e) The director of planning shall ministerially review and approve a parcel map for Urban Lot Split if they determine that the parcel map application meets all requirements of this Chapter. The director of planning shall deny a parcel map application that does not meet any requirement of this Chapter.

(f) The Director of Planning shall determine the appropriate fee required for an application for parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, which may be the fee currently established for a Preliminary Parcel Map or Parcel Map.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it should have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. SECTION 5. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the following reasons. Under Government Code Sections 66411.7(n) and 65852.21(j), an ordinance adopted to implement the requirements of SB 9 shall not be considered a project under CEQA.

13.a

Packet Pg. 254

NOT YET ADOPTED

5 0160067_20220317_ay16

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ____________________________ ____________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager ____________________________ Director of Planning and Development Services

13.a

Packet Pg. 255




Summary Title: Housing Element Sites

Title: Approve the Housing Element Working Group and Planning and Transportation Commission Recommendations for the 2023-31 Housing Element Sites and Their Associated Unit Yields as Well as Potential Feedback on Housing Element Policies and Programs, or Other Housing-Related Direction to Staff.

From: City Manager


Recommendation:

The Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) recommend City Council approve the Housing

Element Working Group recommendations for 2023-31 Housing Element sites and their associated unit

yields (in Attachment A and summarized in Table 3) with the following modifications:

1. Faith Based Institutions Strategy: Require units to be 100% affordable units.

2. City-owned Parking Lots Strategy: Include strategy in the sites list and its 168 unit yield,

providing they are 100% affordable units.

3. General Manufacturing (GM) Zone Strategy: Encourage Council to plan retail, transit, schools,

bike lanes, and parks to support the new neighborhood.

4. General Manufacturing (GM) Zone Strategy: Council to consider changing portions of the GM

zoned sites to a multifamily zone, eliminating general manufacturing uses and permitting

multifamily residential use more broadly in this area.

5. Research, Office, Limited Manufacturing (ROLM) Zone Strategy: Encourage Council to plan retail,

transit, schools, bike lanes and parks to support the new neighborhood.

6. Transit Center Strategy: Increase the unit yield of the Transit Center from 180 units to 270 units.

7. Transit Center Strategy: The residential units on this site should be primarily developed as

affordable units.

In addition, staff welcome any additional direction on housing policies and programs that City Council

wishes to provide.

Executive Summary:

The City is in the process of preparing its 2023-31 Housing Element. Since April 2021, City staff have

been working with the Housing Element Working Group (Working Group) in identifying sufficient sites to

14

Packet Pg. 256


accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 6,086 units. In January 2022, the

Working Group concluded its site selection process by successfully identifying over 460 sites to

accommodate the City’s RHNA. The PTC considered the Working Group’s recommendations at its

February 9 and February 23 meetings.

The Working Group sites selection process was lengthy and complex. The Working Group employed

eight site selection strategies to identify sufficient sites. Underlying the strategies was the Working

Group’s focus on locating sites near public transit as well as protecting the low-density districts and

neighborhoods. Overall, the PTC was supportive of the Working Group’s site selection strategies and

identified sites. The PTC recommended some modifications to the Working Group’s recommendations

and those are discussed in detail in this report.

Since PTC review, staff has continued its refinement of the site selection database and provides those

updates along with the PTC recommendation discussed later in this report.

Background:

Since 1969, the State has required all local jurisdictions to adequately plan to meet the current and

future housing needs of everyone in the community. Local jurisdictions meet this requirement by

adopting housing elements as part of their “general plan” or in the City’s case, the Palo Alto

Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan serves as the City’s "blueprint" for how the city will grow

and develop.

The Housing Element is one of the eight mandated elements1 in the Comprehensive Plan and the only

element that requires certification by the State. This Housing Element covers a period of eight years

from 2023-31, also known as the 6th Cycle. The City’s current Housing Element covers years 2015-23 (5th

Cycle).

California’s housing element law requires local governments to adopt plans and regulatory systems

providing opportunities for housing development. A housing supportive regulatory environment helps

the private housing market to address housing needs of Californians. As a result, housing policy in

California rests largely on the effective implementation of local general plans and in particular, local

housing elements.

For more information about Housing Element requirements, please see the staff report2 prepared for

the City Council Study Session on May 10, 2021.

Discussion:

This discussion briefly summarizes the actions and recommendations by the different advisory bodies

that have been involved in the site selection process.

1 State law mandates inclusion of eight elements in general plans: land use, transportation, conservation, noise,

open space, safety, housing, and most recently, environmental justice. Jurisdictions may elect to include additional

elements. 2 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-

cmrs/2021/id-12116.pdf

14

Packet Pg. 257





Accommodating RHNA

As mentioned, the City’s 6th Cycle RHNA is 6,086 units. The units are broken down into four income

categories as outlined in Table 1. They are as follows:

Table 1: 2023-31 RHNA by Income Category

2023-31 Regional Housing Needs Allocation by Income

Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total

1,556 896 1,013 2,621 6,086

The new RHNA allocation is a threefold increase in units compared to the 5th Cycle of 1,988 units. The

State also requires the City to include a “No Net Loss” buffer; it requires that the jurisdiction not only

plan for the RHNA figure but a certain number of units above what is required, to ensure the jurisdiction

can meet its RHNA at any time. Staff recommended another 609 units, or 10% of the RHNA total, as the

buffer. Therefore, the Working Group was tasked with identifying sufficient sites to accommodate a

total of 6,695 units.

Housing Element Working Group

Before commencing the site selection process, staff presented the Working Group the multitude of new

Housing Element requirements, including the requirement for ‘no net loss’ as well as sites selection

requirements. The State has passed additional legislation that imposes more requirements for site

selection, making identification of sites more complex and challenging. For more details about the

additional site requirements/legislation, please see the May 10, 2021 Joint PTC/Council Study Session

Report.3

Site Selection Process

After the formation of the Working Group in April 2021, efforts focused on the site selection process.

Staff began working with the Working Group to formulate and prioritize preferred site selection

strategies. With the preferred site selection strategies in place, staff and the Working Group began

identifying potential sites.

The Working Group utilized a number of strategies for site identification. Table 2 provides a brief

summary of each selected strategies used to help identify sufficient sites to meet the City’s RHNA.

Throughout the process, the Working Group was deliberate in ensuring the protection of low-density

zones and neighborhoods. In addition, the Working Group was mindful of the City’s development

standards, especially regarding height and parking.

Table 2: Housing Element Working Group Selected Site Strategies with Description

STRATEGY SUMMARY

Pipeline The State allows units from submitted or recently approved

3 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-

cmrs/2021/id-12116.pdf

14

Packet Pg. 258






land use entitlements be applied towards RHNA.

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) The State allows projected ADU production be applied towards

RHNA.

Multifamily Allowed (MFA) Identified multifamily sites that already have the maximum

zoning density.

Upzoning Increasing densities on sites that currently allow for

multifamily residential uses.

Caltrain Stations Increase densities within ½ mile of the City Caltrain stations,

excluding single family zoned properties.

Transit Corridor Increase densities within ½ mile of transit corridors (El Camino

Real and Alma St.)

Faith Based Institutions Use of faith based institution parking lots for multifamily

housing.

General Manufacturing (GM) District Reintroducing residential use in the GM zone district.

Research, Office and Limited

Manufacturing Zone (ROLM) District

Identifying certain ROLM zoned sites for housing.

Stanford-proposed Properties Sites identified as suitable for housing development on land

owned by Stanford University.

Staff suggested Sites Sites that had previous submitted residential land use

applications which shows developer interest on the site.

For more detailed information about each of the strategies, please see the January 31, 2022 Council

Informational Report.4

From these site selection strategies, the Working Group was able to identify sufficient sites to

accommodate over 6,700 units. The Working Group recommendations, including unit yields for each

strategy, can be found in Table 3. For a current list of sites by strategy, please see Attachment A.

Also, an interactive mapping tool has been created to help the community familiarize themselves with

the sites. To review individual sites, staff suggests using the mapping too. The mapping tool can be

found on the City’s housing element website at www.paloaltohousingelement.com.

No Net Loss Buffer

As mentioned, the State requires a No Net Loss unit buffer. The State suggests a buffer equal to 15-30%

of the jurisdictions RHNA requirement. However, staff has recommended using a 10% buffer. Staff

recommends a 10% buffer for the following reasons:

1. A 10% buffer was used for the 5th cycle Housing Element.

2. Sites identified in the 6th cycle Housing Element may be subject to additional requirements if

carried over to future cycles. Therefore, to limit exposure, a smaller percentage buffer is

recommended than the State suggested percentages.

4 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-

agendas-minutes/2022/20220131/20220131pccsm-amended.pdf#page=26

14

Packet Pg. 259

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2022/20220131/20220131pccsm-amended.pdf#page=26

http://www.paloaltohousingelement.com/

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2022/20220131/20220131pccsm-amended.pdf%23page=26

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/agendas-minutes-reports/agendas-minutes/city-council-agendas-minutes/2022/20220131/20220131pccsm-amended.pdf%23page=26


3. Staff used a more conservative unit yield calculation/projection for each identified site. So if an

identified site is developed, it should be likely that it would meet the conservative project yield

if not produce more housing than projected. This diminishes the need for a larger buffer.

The Working Group agreed with staff’s recommendation and wished to keep the buffer as close to 10%

as possible. Staff stated that they would keep the buffer at 10% unless directed otherwise by the PTC or

City Council.

Lower Income Carry Over Sites and By Right Requirements

Carry over sites is a term used for those identified sites in the 4th and 5th cycle Housing Elements that are

proposed to be “carried over” or used to meet the 6th Cycle RHNA. These sites are mentioned because

the State has placed a development “by-right” requirement on certain carry-over sites. The by-right

provision applies to those carry over sites that are designated to help meet its lower income RHNA. As

part of the site analysis for HCD, the City must show sufficient sites to meet its lower income RHNA

requirement. A site is considered appropriate as a lower-income site if it is larger than half acre with a

density of 30 dwelling units/acre or higher. There are 11 properties in the proposed housing site

inventory (upzoning strategy) that would be subject to by-right development totaling 274 units.

The by right requirements apply when a residential development proposes at least 20% of the units as

affordable. The by-right requirement allows the City to perform design review of the project based only

on compliance with objective standards. The City could not conduct any other review, including

environmental.

Staff recently learned that these 11 properties would be eligible for by-right review because the City has

elected to complete state-mandated rezoning requirements after the statutory deadline of January

2023. The Information Report to Council referenced earlier provides more information on this schedule

change, which was in direct response to a shift at HCD regarding the public review requirements of draft

and final Housing Element documents. The PTC and Working Group did not have an opportunity to

weigh in this topic as staff only recently received confirmation of this issue. To the extent the Council

has concerns about these parcels being redeveloped in this manner, they could be removed from the list

and replaced as necessary with sites from the reserve list staff has prepared. However, it is worth noting

that the City Council is expected to adopt objective development standards for residential project in

commercial zones within the next couple months that may render this concern moot.

City Owned Parking Lots

Please note that the Working Group had included the use of City-owned parking lots and its associated

yield of 168 units as an initial strategy. However, after much deliberation, the Working Group did not

recommend including City Owned Parking lots for inclusion in the housing sites inventory. Members of

the Working Group were concerned about the loss of public parking facilities. They were concerned that

if residential use was developed on a City-owned parking lot, there would not be a guarantee that the

existing parking would be replaced. In addition, there was some disagreement about whether it should

be 100% affordable housing or market rate housing; this also contributed to the split vote.

Reserve List

14

Packet Pg. 260


Prior to accepting GM and ROLM zoned sites as a strategy, staff and the Working Group identified a

large number of smaller sized (<0.5 acres) non-vacant sites throughout the City to help meet its RHNA.

However, once the Working Group approved using GM and ROLM sites and its 1,500 unit yield, the

collective unit yield of all the identified sites was approximately 2,000 units more than the City’s target

of 6,795 units. Because there were more sites than needed, staff proposed shifting extra sites into a

“reserve list” and removing them from the City’s formal housing sites list. HCD prefers larger sized sites

for the inventory since they are more conducive for affordable housing development. The reserve list is

mostly comprised of 240 smaller sites with a collective yield of approximately 2,000 units. This reserve

list will not be included in the Housing Element. The reserve list can be used to swap out sites from the

primary list that are not supported, help replenish the buffer, or for potential sites for future housing

elements.

Housing Element Ad Hoc Committee

Staff has also met bi-monthly with the Housing Element Ad Hoc Committee (Ad Hoc) to provide

members with Working Group progress updates. The Ad Hoc provided comments and suggestions for

each site selection strategy. They were supportive with the Working Group’s approach and process. The

Ad Hoc express some willingness to modestly increase height at some strategic locations but expressed

concern about height increases along El Camino Real and in particular two Stanford owned sites near

the transit center and along El Camino real (the McDonald’s site) that were being contemplated by

Stanford as sites that might benefit from even greater height allowances.

Planning and Transportation Commission Recommendations

On January 12, 2022, the PTC conducted a Housing Element Study Session to learn the status of the

Housing Element Update. The study session provided background Housing Element information and

requirements, as well as a synopsis of the Working Group site selection process. The study session also

acted as a precursor or foundation for the PTC’s formal review on February 9, 2022. While the Working

Group did not complete all its recommendations until the next day (January 13, 2022), the PTC was

provided a detailed summary of the Working Groups actions up to that point.

Table 3 below summarizes the Working Group’s final recommendations as well as the PTC’s

recommendations for comparison. Generally, the PTC accepted the Working Group recommendations.

Any difference between the Working Group and PTC recommendation has been highlighted along with a

brief explanation about the change. The areas that the PTC were not in alignment with the Working

Group are as follows:

a. The PTC included City-owned parking lots and its proposed 168 units. The Working Group had

elected not to include City-owned parking lots.

b. The PTC increased the unit yield at that Stanford University proposed Transit Center site to 270

units instead of the Working Group recommended 180 units.

Additional Administrative Changes

While the Council is considering approving the site selection strategies and associated yields, please

note that this sites list is still being refined. For example, three land use applications have been

submitted post PTC review yielding an additional 225 units. Additionally, staff continues to review and

update the housing sites inventory to eliminate errors and generally clean up the data to make sure sites

14

Packet Pg. 261


included on the list meet the state suitability criteria. Table 3 below represents the most up to date unit

count for each category taking into consideration this administrative clean up (highlighted in table) and

the PTC’s recommendations.

Table 3: Site Selection Recommendations from Working Group, PTC and Administrative Changes

WORKING GROUP

Jan 13, 2022

PTC

Feb 23, 2022

Administrative

Changes

3/16/22 NOTES

RHNA Allocation 6,086 6,086 6,086 • Those strategies marked with an

asterisk (*) denote additional PTC

recommendations. Please see

discussion below.

• The highlighted figures represent

the administrative changes

No Net Loss Buffer +609 +609 +609

Total Units Required 6,695 6,695 6,695

Strategy Unit Yield NOTES

Pipeline Units 565 565 790

This number is fluid and modified

as additional applications received.

A number of applications were

received post PTC review.

ADUs 512 512 512

Multifamily Allowed

(MFA) 461 457 402

#1 Upzone* 1,657 1,640 1,385

#2 Caltrain Stations 798 798 739

#3 Transit Corridor 274 274 232

#4 Faith Based

Institutions* 148 148

148

#5 City Owned Parking

Lots* 0 168 168

The Working Group recommended

not to include City-owned parking

lots but the PTC recommended to

include as a strategy.

GM zoned sites* 596 596 590

ROLM zoned sites* 902 902 902

Stanford Proposed Sites

1. Pasteur Dr. 425 425 425

2. 3128 El Camino Real 144 144 144

3. Transit Center* 180 270 270

The PTC recommended an increased

density from the Working Group

recommendation.

Staff Suggested Sites 183 183 183

Total Unit Yield 6,845 7,086 6,890

Difference (Unit Yield - Units Required)

150 391 195

Note: The unit yields reflected in table may continue to be adjusted based on changes in applications received and new

14

Packet Pg. 262


Table 3: Site Selection Recommendations from Working Group, PTC and Administrative Changes

WORKING GROUP

Jan 13, 2022

PTC

Feb 23, 2022

Administrative

Changes

3/16/22 NOTES

information learned.

Attached to this report is a document showing all the properties that are proposed for inclusion in the housing sites

inventory. Staff is also posting the database online on the project website to make it easier to view and sort through

the data: https://paloaltohousingelement.com/.

Other PTC discussions

In addition to recommending site strategies and their associated yields, the PTC made additional

recommendations for certain strategies. For the Upzone strategy, there was discussion to investigate

extending RM-30 zoning development standards to RM-40 zoning including height transition, parking

and open space requirements. There was a motion to include this recommendation but the motion

failed 2-5. The PTC did unanimously approve a recommendation that all units developed on the faith

based institution sites and the City-owned parking lots be 100% affordable. Along similar lines, the PTC

recommended that the units developed at the Transit Center site be primarily affordable units. That

recommendation passed with a 4-3 vote. In approving the strategy to include housing sites in the GM

and ROLM zone districts, the PTC also unanimously approved a recommendation to encourage the

Council to plan retail, transit, schools, bike lanes and parks to support new neighborhoods in those

zones. Lastly, the PTC unanimously approved a recommendation for Council to consider rezoning

segments of GM sites for solely multifamily use instead of integrating multifamily residential use in the

GM zone.

Rezoning Approved Sites

Once the sites have been approved by Council, those affected sites will need to go through the standard

rezoning process as identified for each strategy (e.g. upzone RM-20 to RM-30). The staff work associated

with the rezoning of sites will begin in late spring/early summer. The revision of the General

Manufacturing (GM) zone to allow housing development is intended to be zonewide. For all other

required rezonings, it will be for just the sites identified on the approved list; it will be site specific and

not zonewide. For example, the zone change from RM-20 to RM-30 will only occur on sites listed on

designated housing sites within the “Upzoning” strategy.

Summary of Key Issues:

Council is being asked to endorse the recommended housing sites and associated yields to meet the

RHNA obligation. In this action, please consider:

• A site is not precluded from housing development if it is not listed on the Housing Element sites

list.

• If a site not on the list were to develop housing, those units would all count towards meeting

the City’s RHNA goal.

• Low-density sites (i.e. R-1, R-2, RMD) were not identified as housing opportunity sites

(exception: faith-based institutions).

14

Packet Pg. 263

https://paloaltohousingelement.com/


• The proposed “buffer” of 10% could be marginally increased with some of the additional sites

listed in Table 3 for added buffer, but it is not required.

• The reserve list has identified qualified sites with approximately 2,000 units that could be used

to meet RHNA if Council were to remove sites from the recommended list.

• There are 16 “carry-over” parcels from the 5th Cycle where the development by-right provision

would apply if a code-compliant project with 20% affordable units on-site was proposed. The

Council could elect to remove some or all of those sites if the by-right provision is a concern.

Replacement sites would be selected from the Reserve list.

Policy Implications:

The Housing Element is a state mandated document that will guide housing development in the City

through 2031 through its goals, policies and programs. These policies and programs will not only spur

housing production in the City but will also focus on fair housing, maintaining and monitoring the site

inventory, and focus on the protection of vulnerable groups.

The Working Group is currently working on Housing Element Policies and Programs to address these

issues and requirements. The City Council is scheduled to review those policies and programs in June

2022, however, as part of this discussion, the Council may provide some initial guidance to staff and

Working Group on housing policies that should be incorporated into this plan as appropriate.

Tentative Timeline:

Following Council’s endorsement of a list of housing sites, staff will begin work related to the

environmental review and continue its work with the Working Group to identify housing policies and

programs for inclusion in the Housing Element. The PTC and City Council will similarly weigh in on this

effort. The State’s deadline to complete the Housing Element is January 31, 2023.

Housing Element:

March 2022 Council review of Sites

April/May 2022 PTC review of Housing Element Policies and Programs

June 2022 Council review of the Housing Element Policies and Programs

June 2022 30-day review of Administrative Draft

November 2022 Formal PTC review of Housing Element

January 2023 Council Adoption of Housing Element

Rezoning Process:

April 2023 PTC review of rezoning

March 2023 “Substantial Compliance” from HCD

June 2023 Council review of Rezoning

August 2023 HCD Certification

Stakeholder Engagement:

City staff has performed extensive public outreach for Housing Element update. The City has created a

Housing Element Update website where the public can access all City Housing Element meetings as well

as informational resources, held two community meetings with another scheduled for May to present

14

Packet Pg. 264


different aspects of the Housing Element and circulated an online housing survey that received over 430

responses. In addition, as the City prepares its Housing Element policies and programs, meetings are

being conducted with focus groups including renters, seniors, and persons with disabilities for their

input. Future outreach activities include going to the Farmer’s Market and May Fete parade to inform

the public about the Housing Element Update.

Environmental Review:

The completed 2023-31 Housing Element is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The associated work for the update process is divided into two separate actions, the adoption of the

Housing Element document and the approval of associated rezoning requirements. The adoption of the

Housing Element (comprised of housing sites selection and policies and programs) requires an

Addendum to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan EIR. The required rezoning action/s require the preparation

of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). The respective CEQA documents will be

completed prior to the related final PTC and Council actions.

Attachments:

Attachment14.a: Attachment A - Housing List by Strategy and Complete Housing List

(PDF)

14

Packet Pg. 265

Very Low Income Low Income Moderate Income Above Moderate Income Total

RHNA Allocation 1,556 896 1,013 2,621 6,086

Planned and Approved Units (Pipeline) 133 142 87 402 790

ADUs 0 0 0 512 512

Multi‐Family Allowed 33 20 254 95 402

Upzone 450 265 303 367 1,385

Caltrain Station 182 107 196 254 739

Transit Corridor 59 34 55 84 232

City Owned Parking Lots 106 62 0 0 168

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 69 41 38 0 148

GM 156 92 179 163 590

ROLM 568 334 0 0 902

Stanford Sites 0 0 0 839 839

Staff Suggested Sites 0 0 0 183 183

Total Units From Selected Sites 1,757 1,096 1,112 2,899 6,890Total Unit Surplus 334 342 186 1,192

Total % Buffer above Remaining RHNA After Credits 12% 13% 56% 65%

Category Units Removed # of Sites

Caltrain Station 75 10

MFA 57 8

Transit Corridor 42 8

Upzone 240 42

414 68

Opportunity Sites

*Lower income sites divided proportionally between Very Low Income and Low Income

Sites Removed Summary

Summary of Unit Yields by Strategy

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 266

Project Name Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Max. Units

Allowed

Percent of Max.

Density

Very Low Low Moderate Above

Moderate

Net New

Units

Achieved

Status Notes

2755 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13236084 0.48 MISP PF N/A N/A 0 0 0 57 57 ENTITLED PF does not allow for Resi. Redevelopment of a parking lot to residential.

565, 571 HAMILTON AVE and 542 WEBSTER

94301 12003062 0.52 CC CD‐C (P) and RM‐40

20 95% 0 0 0 19 19 ENTITLED Redevelopment. Lot consolidation.

3225 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238042 0.68 CS CS 20 40% 0 0 0 8 8 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevlopment of commericial to residential. Potentially remove this project as unit yield is low and it brings down the density average.

3705‐3709 EL CAMINO REAL (Wilton Court)

94306 13235045 0.46 CN CN 9 656% 58 0 0 1 59 ENTITLED 100% affordable housing. Great example to show lower income can occur on small sites.

190 CHANNING AV 94301 12028051 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 9 44% 0 0 0 4 4 ENTITLED Redevelopment of commercial to residential. Mixed‐use project. RT‐35 doesn’t have a du/ac. Showing 50 du/ac per assumptions made on 5th Cycle HE.

3265 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238020 0.17 CS CS 5 60% 0 0 0 3 3 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project.3585 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240058 0.14 CN CN 2 150% 0 0 0 3 3 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevelopment of

commercial to residential.4115 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246100 0.35 CN CN 7 100% 0 1 0 6 7 ENTITLED Mixed‐use project. Redevelopment of

commercial to residential.788 ‐ 790 SAN ANTONIO AVE 94303 14703041 0.52 CS CS 15 680% 0 0 16 86 102 ENTITLED Project density is way higher than max density

allowed.

200 PORTAGE AVE 94306 13238071 4.86 RM‐30 145 63% 0 0 14 77 91 UNDER REVIEW Redevelopment of commercial to residential.

2850 ‐ 2870 W BAYSHORE RD 94303 12701160 2.34 RO ROLM 70 69% 0 0 7 41 48 UNDER REVIEW Redevelopment of existing uses to residnetial.

486 HAMILTON AVE 94301 12016008 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) 4 100% 0 0 0 4 4 UNDER REVIEW CD‐C (P) doesn’t have a du/ac. Showing 40 du/ac per assumptions made on 5th Cycle HE

231 GRANT AVE. 13231074 PF 0 17 50 43 110 UNDER REVIEW County owned and County to approve entitlements

660 ‐680 UNIVERSITY AV, 511 BY94301 12003042, 12003043 0.28 MF RM‐20 5 1400% 0 20 0 50 70 UNDER REVIEW Request for Planned Community (PC), to Combine 3 Parcels (511 Byron St, 660 University Ave, 680 University Ave/500 Middlefield Rd), Demolish Existing Buildings (9,216 SF Office) and Provide a New Four Story Mixed‐Use Building with Ground Floor Office (9,115 SF) and Multi‐Family Residential (all floors) Including a Two Level Below‐Grade Parking Garage. Proposed Residential (42,981 SF) Will Include 70 Units (56 Studios, 6 1‐Bedroom, 8 2‐Bedroom).

824 San Antonio Rd 94303 14703040 0.44 CS CS 22 UNDER REVIEW D emolition of an Existing 8,631 Square Foot Commercial Building and Construction of a Four‐Story, approximately 53,855 Square Foot Private Residential Care Facility.

Pipeline Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 267

739 SUTTER AVE 94303 12735200 0.38 MF RM‐20 4 UNDER REVIEW Demolition of an Existing 8 Unit, Apartment Building and Construction of twelve Three‐Story Townhome Units, approximately 1,195 to 1,475 square feet of living space per unit; each unit includes a two‐car garage and a deck to provide private open space. The proposal anticipates the use of Density Bonus Law to allow the development and offers two of the eight “base units” (25%) as deed‐restricted Affordable Housing (at the Low‐Income level of affordability). A 50% Density Bonus is anticipated in addition to related waivers, concessions, and incentives.

3001‐ 3017 El Camino Real 94306 CS 50 79 129 UNDER REVIEW The project proposes using the State Density Bonus to construct a five‐story residential building with 100% affordable multi‐family housing (129 units) on a proposed new 49,864 sf lot on 3001‐3017 El Camino Real. Environmental Assessment: Pending

525 E. CHARLESTON RD. 13206039 25 25 0 0 50 UNDER REVIEW County owned. Seeking expedited review under SB

255% 133 142 87 402 790

2019 62

2020 43

2021 87

Average 64

6th Cycle 512

ADUs

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 268

Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN AcresGeneral

PlanZoning Current Use

Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income Category Publicly Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILR Year Built FloodzoneTCAC Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservation

Within 150'

BufferHistoric Resource Status Notes

MFA 160 FOREST AV 94301 12027047 0.66 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 50 40 0 32 26 26 Lower NO – Privately Owned No 1.06 1926 X High ResourceMFA Leghorn St 94303 14705012 0.85 CS CS Auto storage 40 32 0 33 27 27 Lower NO – Privately Owned No 0 1900 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA ‐ Lower Income 0.66 53

MFA 624 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003040 0.15 MF RM‐40 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6) 31 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.33 1926 X;AH47 High ResourceMFA 426 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015039 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story salon (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.32 1920 X High ResourceMFA 436 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015040 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.00 1951 X High ResourceMFA 401 Waverley St 94301 12015007 0.22 CC CD‐C (P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.09 1977 X High Resource Yes

MFA 425 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015036 0.09 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 3 2 2 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.00 1908 X High ResourceMFA 630 Cowper St 94301 12016011 0.34 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.45 1956 X High Resource Yes

MFA 330 LYTTON AV 94301 12015003 0.16 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.46 1957 X High ResourceMFA 318 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015058 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes

MFA 328 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015059 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes

MFA 550 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015084 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.91 1952 X High ResourceMFA 560 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015085 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.89 1938 X High ResourceMFA 530 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003031 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.69 1957 X High ResourceMFA 546 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003033 0.10 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.54 1955 X High Resource Yes

MFA 635 Waverley St 94301 12016020 0.31 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 12 9 9 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.91 1966 X High Resource Yes

MFA 654 HIGH ST 94301 12027037 0.19 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.04 1900 X High Resource Yes

MFA 435 TASSO ST 94301 12003025 0.33 CC CD‐C (P) Three story office space (FAR: 2.0) 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.50 1984 X High Resource Yes

MFA 555 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003024 0.17 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.01 1970 X High Resource Yes

MFA 439 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015078 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.07 0 X High ResourceMFA 515 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015081 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceMFA 527 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015080 0.16 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceMFA 701 Emerson St 94301 12027049 0.22 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story spa (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.98 2003 X High ResourceMFA 721 Emerson St 94301 12027072 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.80 2003 X High ResourceMFA 999 Alma St 94301 12028095 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.30 1952 X High ResourceMFA 1015 ALMA ST 94301 12030049 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story preschool (FAR: 0.2) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.25 1955 X High ResourceMFA 1027 Alma St 94301 12030048 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.79 1956 X High ResourceMFA 718 Emerson St 94301 12027073 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story auto repair (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.54 1950 X High ResourceMFA 840 Emerson St 94301 12028037 0.48 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 24 19 19 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.03 1959 X High ResourceMFA 849 High St 94301 12028040 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.49 1950 X High ResourceMFA 926 Emerson St 94301 12028085 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Two story office space, cleaners (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.34 1962 X High ResourceMFA 901 High St 94301 12028050 0.32 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.01 1900 X High ResourceMFA 925 High St 94301 12028091 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 7 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.01 0 X High ResourceMFA 929 HIGH ST 94301 12028090 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.20 1955 X High ResourceMFA 975 HIGH ST 94301 12028089 0.35 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 50 40 0 17 14 14 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.47 1968 X High ResourceMFA 940 High St 94301 12028092 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.63 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 960 High St 94301 12028093 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.59 1947 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 917 Alma St 94301 12028097 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.20 1929 X High ResourceMFA 660 HIGH ST 94301 12027039 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.30 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 853 ALMA ST 94301 12028046 0.16 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.11 1927 X High ResourceMFA 875 ALMA ST 94301 12028045 0.32 SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story retail (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.79 1949 X High ResourceMFA 2011 El Camino Real 94306 12431024 0.20 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.62 1930 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 2905 El Camino Real 94306 13237033 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.18 1950 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes

MFA ‐ Moderate Income 7.34 254

MFA 466 GRANT AV 94306 12433037 0.19 MF RM‐40 Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.02 1900 X High ResourceMFA 464 FOREST AV 94301 12016044 0.23 SOFA I CAP RM‐40 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 31 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.39 1952 X High ResourceMFA 609 COWPER ST 94301 12004001 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.27 1921 X High Resource Yes

MFA 440 KIPLING ST 94301 12015027 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.62 1946 X High ResourceMFA 439 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015034 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.66 1949 X High ResourceMFA 543 COWPER ST 94301 12003067 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.47 1978 X High ResourceMFA 525 ALMA ST 94301 12026109 0.25 CC CD‐C (P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.39 1948 X High ResourceMFA 654 GILMAN ST 94301 12016032 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.24 1950 X High ResourceMFA 550 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003035 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.97 1955 X High Resource Yes

MFA 821 EMERSON ST 94301 12028036 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.32 1966 X High ResourceMFA 829 Emerson St 94301 12028099 0.19 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.90 1962 X High ResourceMFA 839 Emerson St 94301 12028033 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.03 1959 X High ResourceMFA 847 EMERSON ST 94301 12028032 0.08 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.05 1924 X High ResourceMFA 160 Homer Av 94301 12028004 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.05 1900 X High ResourceMFA HIGH ST 94301 12028042 0.16 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.03 1900 X High ResourceMFA 933 EMERSON ST 94301 12028081 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story salon (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 0.59 1950 X High ResourceMFA 943 Emerson St 94301 12028080 0.11 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned Yes 1.05 1902 X High ResourceMFA 444 COWPER ST 94301 12015014 0.14 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.04 1900 X High ResourceMFA 2098 El Camino Real 94306 13701112 0.10 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.94 1952 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 1955 El Camino Real 94306 12430016 0.12 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8) 20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.96 1951 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 163 EVERETT AV 94301 12025042 0.19 CN CD‐N One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.70 1951 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur KarahanMFA El Camino Real 94306 14220080 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 30 24 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 0 N/A X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes

MFA 2227 El Camino Real 94306 12432071 0.10 CC CC (2) One story retail (FAR: 0.7) 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.92 1946 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 929 EMERSON ST 94301 12028082 0.12 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.02 1912 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur KarahanMFA ‐ Above Moderate Income 2.59 95

MFA ‐ Total 10.58 402

Multifamily Allowed (MFA) Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 269



Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income CategoryPublicly

Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILR Year Built Floodzone

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservation

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic Resource Status Notes

Upzone 850 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005011 0.66 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva No 0.47 1955 X High ResourceUpzone 652 HOMER AV 94301 12005008 0.64 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva No 0.36 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 4146 El Camino Real 94301 13724034 0.77 MF RM‐20 Vacant 8 30 24 0 23 18 18 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 X High ResourceUpzone 1681 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12425044 0.91 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 21 21 Lower NO – Priva No 0.11 1939 X High ResourceUpzone 853 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332094 0.80 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.57 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 4151 Middlefield Rd 94301 12715023 0.93 MF RM‐20 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 22 22 Lower NO – Priva Yes 1.26 1961 X High ResourceUpzone 3606 El Camino Real 94301 13708080 0.65 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4085 El Camino Wy 94306 13243153 0.71 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 21 17 17 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.71 1985 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4113 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244022 0.64 CN CN One story preshcool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2754 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13255029 0.55 CN CN (GF/P) One story Retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 16 13 13 Lower NO – Priva No 0.61 1952 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2811 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734098 1.74 CN CN (GF/P) Supermarket (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 52 41 41 Lower NO – Priva No 0.10 1964 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3902 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708048 4.26 CN CN (GF/P) One story strip mall (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 127 102 102 Lower NO – Priva No 0.08 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3901 El Camino Real 94301 13242073 1.10 MF RM‐30 One story Hotel (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower NO – Priva Yes 1.09 1956 X High ResourceUpzone EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13238072 1.11 MF;CS RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 320 SAN ANTONIO RD 94306 14709069 0.76 MF;RO RM‐30 Vacant 16 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3375 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13239088 0.74 CS;CN CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 29 23 23 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.30 1971 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4224 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 16708037 0.63 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4230 El Camino Real 94301 16708030 0.52 CS CS One story car rental (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.05 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3903 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242072 0.53 CS CS One story bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 21 16 16 Lower NO – Priva No 1.06 1997 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220037 0.61 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.32 1947 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4238 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708031 0.65 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower NO – Priva No 0.37 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4256 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708042 0.60 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.09 1964 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4279 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14801016 0.80 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 32 25 25 Lower NO – Priva No 0.52 1961 X;ACr High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14809011 0.95 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 38 30 30 Lower NO – Priva No 0.38 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 760 San Antonio Ave 94303 14705091 0.65 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.49 1975 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4291 El Camino Real 94301 14809014 1.16 CS CS Two story bank (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 46 37 37 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.33 1957 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 720 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14705087 1.36 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 54 43 43 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.44 1965 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 841 El Camino Real 94301 12034001 0.64 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 1973 X High Resource Yes

Upzone ‐ Lower Income 26.07 715

Upzone 884 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005012 0.23 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.69 1953 X High ResourceUpzone 655 HOMER AV 94301 12004057 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 744 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004053 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.69 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 116 COLERIDGE AV 94301 12417003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.09 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 660 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004017 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.29 1951 AH42.8 High ResourceUpzone 827 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332064 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.21 1926 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 905 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00333013 0.27 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.31 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 3200 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13210148 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5) 8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.68 1957 X High ResourceUpzone 127 RINCONADA AV 94301 12418095 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.14 1932 X High ResourceUpzone 114 SEALE AV 94301 12418050 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.55 1962 X High ResourceUpzone 119 SEALE AV 94301 12418045 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.53 1966 X High ResourceUpzone 424 SENECA ST 94301 00303013 0.28 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 6 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.15 1903 A High ResourceUpzone 660 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003043 0.20 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.01 1900 AH46.9 High ResourceUpzone 680 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003044 0.22 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.13 1952 AH46.9 High ResourceUpzone 116 EMERSON ST 94301 12024019 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.92 1922 X High ResourceUpzone 124 EMERSON ST 94301 12024020 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.35 1926 X High ResourceUpzone 2741 MIDDLEFIELD AV 94306 12734095 0.22 CN CN (GF/P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5)/maybe 2 story? 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.43 1956 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3900 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708049 0.29 CN CN (GF/P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.07 1958 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 720 Cowper St 94301 12016046 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.49 1973 X High ResourceUpzone 575 Middlefield Rd 94301 00302043 0.28 MF RM‐30 Two story medical office (FAR: 1.5) 16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1963 AH45.3 High ResourceUpzone 720 University Av 94301 00302047 0.41 MF RM‐30 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.37 1954 AH46.6 High ResourceUpzone 417 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432026 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.60 1948 X High ResourceUpzone 701 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00302022 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1959 AH48 High ResourceUpzone 725 University Av 94301 00302021 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1954 AH47.9 High ResourceUpzone 435 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00302023 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.91 1961 AH48.1 High ResourceUpzone 2181 PARK BL 94306 12427038 0.25 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.07 1957 X High ResourceUpzone 3691 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240062 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.92 1946 X High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 3636 El Camino Real 94301 13708078 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.09 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3666 El Camino Real 94301 13708097 0.25 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.46 1931 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3630 El Camino Real 94301 13708081 0.37 CN CN Two story office space (FAR 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.39 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2127 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12431059 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant and office space (0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.91 1940 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2137 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431058 0.32 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.01 1900 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 1921 El Camino Real 94301 12430017 0.43 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.98 1945 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2280 El Camino Real 94301 13701113 0.43 CN CN Fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.07 1969 X High ResourceUpzone 3700 El Camino Real 94301 13711078 0.36 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.01 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4127 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246104 0.45 CN CN Two story restaurant and office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 30 24 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.14 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2080 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701132 0.31 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.18 1961 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4335 El Camino Real 94301 14809010 0.40 CS CS Two story spa (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.21 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 268 Lambert Av 94306 13238048 0.35 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.65 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 320 Lambert Av 94306 13238058 0.28 CS CS One story vacant retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.42 1978 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4201 Middlefield 94301 14705086 0.32 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.09 1992 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 780 San Antonio Ave 94303 14705092 0.42 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.14 1988 X High Resource YesUpzone 3508 El Camino Real 94301 13708088 0.24 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.16 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone ‐ Moderate Income 12.44 303

Upzone 2225 ALMA ST 94301 12420001 0.16 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.11 1954 X High ResourceUpzone 122 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.78 1925 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12003046 0.13 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.02 1900 AH46.1 High ResourceUpzone EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239075 0.18 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone KENDALL AV 94306 13708033 0.13 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 564 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701036 0.13 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.47 1949 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3972 El Camino Real 94301 13711091 0.25 CN CN One story auto repair (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.27 1959 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 706 COLORADO AV 94306 12734092 0.18 CN CN (GF/P) One story retail/restaurant (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.27 1954 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 708 COLORADO AV 94306 12734054 0.13 CN CN (GF/P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.14 1968 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2801 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734052 0.17 CN CN (GF/P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.00 1986 X High ResourceUpzone 397 Curtner Ave. 94306 13241025 0.19 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 40 32 2 7 6 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.73 1954 X High ResourceUpzone 202 BRYANT ST 94301 12025159 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.61 1918 X High ResourceUpzone 343 COWPER ST 94301 12010044 0.19 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1907 X High ResourceUpzone 262 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12025158 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.97 1918 X High ResourceUpzone 727 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004066 0.14 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.00 1993 X High ResourceUpzone 590 FOREST ST 94301 12004043 0.22 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.67 1949 X High ResourceUpzone 325 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428013 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.23 1938 X High ResourceUpzone 730 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004069 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.33 1900 X High Resource

Upzone Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 270

Upzone 371 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432031 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.08 1949 X High ResourceUpzone 643 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004022 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.03 1903 AH43.6 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 727 RAMONA ST 94301 12027064 0.12SOFA I CAP RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone 3337 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239005 0.17 CS CS One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.72 1938 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3839 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241089 0.17 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.68 1947 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3929 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242068 0.17 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.49 1948 X High Resource Yes Yes


Upzone 75 ENCINA AV 94301 12033003 0.13 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.44 1958 X High ResourceUpzone 411 LAMBERT AV 94306 13239017 0.16 CS CS Two story gym (FAR: 0.6), vacant/surface parking lot 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone MATADERO AV 94306 13708016 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 460 Lambert Av 94306 13238017 0.22 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.08 1937 X High ResourceUpzone 814 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703043 0.43 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.42 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 816‐814 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703039 0.44 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.38 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 824 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703040 0.44 CS CS Two story office space (FAR 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.00 1986 X High ResourceUpzone 840 San Antonio Ave 94303 14703064 0.49 CS CS auto repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1962 AE10.5 High ResourceUpzone 2290 BIRCH ST 94306 12432002 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story medical office (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.17 1957 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 400 Cambridge Av 94306 12432006 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.21 1971 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 430 Cambridge Av 94306 12432009 0.14 CC CC (2)(R) One story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.33 1958 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 456 Cambridge Av 94306 12432012 0.16 CC CC (2)(R) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.82 1951 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 310 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432034 0.27 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 2.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.74 1945 X High ResourceUpzone 3516 El Camino Real 94301 13708079 0.23 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.10 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 4191 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13246120 0.36 CS CS One story dentist and fitness center (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.56 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4195 El Camino Real 94301 13246119 0.35 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.89 1989 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4232 El Camino Real 94301 16708036 0.43 CS CS One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.08 1954 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 805 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033012 0.24 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.56 1940 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033011 0.20 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.37 1955 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3339 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239074 0.36 CS CS One story lodging (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239080 0.22 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.37 1968 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13241088 0.35 CS CS One story physical therapy (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.20 1963 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 455 Lambert Av 94306 13239087 0.32 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.57 1965 X High ResourceUpzone 3200 Ash St 94306 13238045 0.39 CS CS One story office space FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 15 12 12 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.20 1975 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 425 Portage Av 94306 13238068 0.40 CS CS One story fitness center (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 16 12 12 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1951 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 27 ENCINA AV 94301 12033010 0.16 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone 414 California Av 94306 12432040 0.37 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.34 1958 X High ResourceUpzone 910 Charleston Rd 94303 14703065 0.48 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.33 1978 AE10.5 High ResourceUpzone 63 ENCINA AV 94301 12033004 0.27 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.17 1941 X High ResourceUpzone 2401 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433061 0.24 CC CC One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.56 1975 X High ResourceUpzone ‐ Above Moderate Income 12.91 367

Upzone ‐ Total 51.42 1385

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 271



Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density (du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing


Owned

Included in 5th

Cycle HEILR Year Built Floodzone

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended

Site

Retail

Preservation

Within

150'

Buffer


Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 94306 13232043 1.38 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 55 44 44 Lower NO – Priv No 1950 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220012 0.75 CS CS (AS1) One story bank (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower NO – Priv No 1.01 0 High Resource Yes Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2673 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13236077 0.64 CN CN One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower NO – Priv Yes 0.59 1970 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2310 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701129 0.76 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower NO – Priv Yes 1.39 1924 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 530 LYTTON AV 94301 12003070 0.67 CC CD‐C (P) Four story office building (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower NO – Priv No 1906 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station Cambridge ave 94306 12432050 0.65 CC PF(R) Parking structure 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower YES ‐ City No 1910 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 3197 PARK BL 94306 13226076 0.59 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower YES ‐ City No 1.43 0 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 156 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428045 1.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story grocery store (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 57 45 45 Lower NO – Priv Yes 0.30 1950 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 150 GRANT AV 94306 12429020 0.60 CC CC (2)(R) One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 29 23 23 Lower NO – Priv No 0.23 1979 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station NITA AV 94306 14709056 1.25 RO ROLM Surface Parking 50 40 0 62 50 50 Lower NO – Priv No 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station ‐ Lower Income 8.43 289

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 94306 13232042 0.28 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priv No 1961 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2805 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237067 0.39 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.92 1946 High Resource Yes Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.63 0 High Resource Yes Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1885 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430060 0.13 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Priv No 1.50 0 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1895 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430061 0.16 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priv No 1.49 0 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 305 LYTTON AV 94301 12014101 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priv No 1.14 1980 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 321 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015090 0.23 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.75 1947 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 490 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432046 0.33 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Three store office space and retail (FAR: 1.2) 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Priv No 1.30 1955 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 447 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433016 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.57 1900 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 451 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433015 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.45 1962 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 441 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433017 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.95 1954 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 445 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433043 0.28 CC CC (2) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.61 1975 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2455 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433008 0.38 CC CC (2) Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.10 1970 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station YALE ST 94306 13701078 0.14 CN CN Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate NO – Priv No 1958 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 577 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701125 0.44 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 1.24 1958 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701070 0.41 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 0.19 1990 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 555 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701069 0.48 CN CN Single story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 0.57 1958 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2000 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701116 0.27 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 1.14 0 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 1963 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430015 0.28 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 11 9 9 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 0.05 1950 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 100 ADDISON AV 94301 12030050 0.24 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story preschool (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priv No 1980 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2041 ALMA ST 94301 12419054 0.20 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 10 8 6 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.90 1954 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 324 EMERSON ST 94301 12025094 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priv No 0.43 1911 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2151 PARK BL 94306 12427039 0.26 MF RM‐30 Two story office building (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 50 40 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 1.05 1958 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2211 PARK BL 94306 12428043 0.35 MF RM‐30 One stury office building (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 50 40 0 17 13 13 Moderate NO – Priv Yes 0.33 1956 High ResourceCaltrain Station ‐ Moderate Income 6.31 196

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 221 BRYANT ST 94301 12014011 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.08 1928 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 197 BRYANT ST 94301 12012022 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.49 0 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 343 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12012019 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 10 8 6 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.35 1959 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 733 RAMONA ST 94301 12027063 0.10 MF RM‐30 Vacant 16 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1906 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station Ash St 94306 13236024 0.10 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 425 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433019 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.15 0 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2305 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12432049 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.34 1951 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 463 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433013 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.02 1953 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 461 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433014 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.83 1953 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 415 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12432052 0.13 CC CC (2)(R) Two story vacant office building (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.87 0 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 440 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432041 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.22 1959 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 576 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 13701075 0.19 CN CN Two store office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.21 1958 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2001 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431025 0.18 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.18 1953 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 280 LAMBERT AV 94306 13238043 0.09 CS CS Surface Parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2904 ASH ST 94306 13237041 0.18 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.73 1998 High Resource Yes

Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 160 HOMER AV 94301 12028005 0.14 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.03 1961 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 145 ADDISON AV 94301 12028094 0.18 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.77 1950 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Between 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from Downtown Station 828 BRYANT ST 94301 12028018 0.13 SOFA I CAP AMF One story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.72 1900 High ResourceBetween 1/4 and 1/2 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 3040 PARK BL 94306 13232036 0.17 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.90 1953 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 170 EMERSON ST 94301 12024025 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.72 1912 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2233 ALMA ST 94301 12420037 0.25 MF RM‐20 One story office space (FAR: 0.4) 8 50 40 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.26 1956 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 106 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419001 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.06 1925 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 114 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419002 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.40 1925 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 230 EMERSON ST 94301 12025036 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.39 1901 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2155 ALMA ST 94301 12419108 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.29 1948 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 326 BRYANT ST 94301 12025070 0.12 MF RM‐30 One story office space (FAR: 0.7) 16 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.63 1946 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/4 Mile from Downtown Station 330 BRYANT ST 94301 12065002 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.00 1982 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 345 HIGH ST 94301 12025100 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.08 1990 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 102 COLORADO AV 94301 13225047 0.17 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 50 40 2 8 6 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.13 1953 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 255 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428021 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.11 1920 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 267 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428019 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.07 1967 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 355 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432001 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.07 1928 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 404 SHERIDAN AV 94306 13236025 0.11 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 240 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428031 0.16 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story office space (FAR: 0.3) 50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.76 1962 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 209 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429001 0.12 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.50 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 265 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429021 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.00 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 239 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429007 0.26 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 13 10 10 Above Moderate NO – Priv Yes 1.20 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 261 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429022 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.02 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2453 ASH ST 94306 12433027 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.11 1958 High Resource1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 407 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433022 0.10 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.18 1902 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 2501 PARK BL 94306 12429012 0.12 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office building (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.93 1947 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station PARK BL 94306 12428003 0.29 CC CC (2)(R) Surface Parking 50 40 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priv Yes 1900 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from California Ave. or San Antonio Station 360 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432036 0.15 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.30 1953 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 424 EMERSON ST 94301 12026025 0.09 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.05 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 227 FOREST AV 94301 12027017 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.32 1965 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 420 RAMONA ST 94301 12026013 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story bank (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.50 1951 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 640 RAMONA ST 94301 12027015 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.00 1910 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 635 HIGH ST 94301 12027034 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.08 1946 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 203 FOREST AV 94301 12027018 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.30 1958 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 647 EMERSON ST 94301 12027019 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.35 1920 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 644 EMERSON ST 94301 12027027 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.12 1962 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 532 BRYANT ST 94301 12026062 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.24 1950 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 117 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026039 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.38 1928 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 412 EMERSON ST 94301 12026106 0.15 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.50 1958 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 291 ALMA ST 94301 12025056 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) One story office building (FAR: 0.5) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.01 1959 High Resource1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 247 HIGH ST 94301 12025044 0.09 CC CD‐N (P) One story dentist office (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.37 1915 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 251 HIGH ST 94301 12025043 0.19 CC CD‐N (P) One story office building (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 1.32 1956 High Resource Yes

1/4 Mile from Downtown Station 316 HIGH ST 94301 12025105 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priv No 0.04 1900 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station ‐ Above Moderate Income 8.04 254

Caltrain Station ‐ Total 22.79 739

Caltrain Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 272



Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income Category Publicly Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILRYear

BuiltFloodzone

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within 150'

BufferHistoric Resource Status Notes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes MAYBELL AV 94306 13724045 0.56 CN RM‐20 Surface parking 8 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower No 0.02 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 561 VISTA AV 94306 13737004 0.65 MF RM‐30 Faith‐based insitution 16 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower No 0.03 1975 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4170 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13724046 1.01 CS CS One story grocery store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 1.01 1996 High Resource Yes Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3150 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220054 0.75 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.65 1969 High Resource Yes

Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Lower Income 2.97 93

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 126 LOWELL AV 94301 12417042 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.13 1994 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 120 LOWELL AV 94301 12417041 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.42 1988 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 114 LOWELL AV 94301 12417040 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.45 1985 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO REAL 94304 14220079 0.19 CS CS Vacant 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No High Resource Yes1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3780 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711098 0.24 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.13 1950 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4113 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246116 0.21 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 1.09 1990 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3960 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711080 0.11 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.62 1952 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3924 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711084 0.16 CN CN Commercial (FAR: 0.98) office space 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.57 1934 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3916 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711087 0.16 CN CN Auto dealership (0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.34 1963 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3878 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711082 0.11 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.85 1940 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3876 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711081 0.11 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.18 1960 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3864 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711089 0.18 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 1.19 1956 High Resource Yes

Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Moderate Income 2.00 55

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 16 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424026 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.20 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 12 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424025 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 5 4 2 Above Moderate No 0.09 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 211 MANZANITA AV 94306 12424008 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.99 1937 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 19981/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 105 LOWELL AV 94301 12417035 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.11 1948 High Resource1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes Lambert Avenue 94306 13238018 0.23 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.03 1955 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3897 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241086 0.36 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2) 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.52 2000 High Resource Yes Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4143 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13246077 0.11 CN CN Residential (1) 40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.88 1940 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711074 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3760 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711079 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.04 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3505 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240060 0.14 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.3) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.26 1950 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3545 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240063 0.14 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.34 1969 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4117 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246105 0.16 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.85 1983 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4131 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244010 0.16 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4) surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.43 1956 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4125 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244012 0.18 CN CN One story art school (FAR: 0.7) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.11 1955 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244090 0.09 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1900 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3487 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239078 0.20 CN CN Two story retail (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.60 1963 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3457 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239077 0.15 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 1.11 1950 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 3944 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711085 0.22 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.49 1987 High Resource Yes

1/2 Mile of Frequent Bus Routes 4123 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246103 0.20 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.3)surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Privately Owned No 0.64 1960 High Resource Yes

Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Above Moderate Income 3.12 84

Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Total 8.09 232

Transit Corridor Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 273

Zip Code APN AcresGeneral

PlanZoning

Current

Use

Minimum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income

Category

Publicly

Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILR Year Built Floodzone

TCAC

Opportun

ity Area

WG

Member

Who

Recomm

ended

Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

94301 12026027 0.54 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 27 21 21 Lower City Owned No High Resource94301 12014088 0.85 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 42 34 34 Lower City Owned No High Resource94301 12015086 0.64 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 32 25 25 Lower City Owned No High Resource94301 12015073 0.67 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 33 26 26 Lower City Owned No High Resource94301 12433007 1.00 CC PF Surface parking 50 40 0 50 40 40 Lower City Owned No High Resource94301 12432055 0.56 CC PF(R) Surface parking 50 40 0 28 22 22 Lower City Owned No High Resource

4.26 168

4.26 168

City Owned Parking Lots Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 274

Category/StrategySite Address or

StreetZip Code APN Acres

General


Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income

Category

Publicly

Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILRYear

BuiltFloodzone

TCAC

Opportun

ity Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservation

Within

150'

Buffer


Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1985 Louis Rd 94303 00350022 1.09 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 32 26 26 Lower NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1140 Cowper St 94301 12018048 0.61 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 18 14 14 Lower NO – Priv No High Resource Yes Category 2; Professorville (Designation applies to 457 building only)Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 2890 Middlefield Rd 94306 13203193 0.76 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 22 18 18 Lower NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 3149 Waverley St 94306 13220161 0.69 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 20 16 16 Lower NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 3505 Middlefield Rd 94306 12747042 1.50 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 45 36 36 Lower NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions ‐ Lower Income 4.65 110

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 625 Hamilton Ave 94301 12003056 0.21 MF RM‐40 Faith‐based insitution 31 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 2490 Middlefield Rd 94301 13201083 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 687 Arastradero Rd 94306 16704013 0.26 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priv No High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 865 Stanford Ave 94306 13702088 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions (surface parking/vacant space) 1611 Standford Ave 94306 13707040 0.21 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priv No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions ‐ Moderate Income 1.60 38

Frequent Bus Routes ‐ Total 6.25 148

Faith Based Institution Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 275



Minimum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density (du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing


Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILR Year BuiltFloodzon

e

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

GM 950 INDUSTRIAL ST 94303 14701061 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower NO – Priva No 0.37 1972 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 937 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701086 0.57 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower NO – Priva No 0.21 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 990 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701041 0.79 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 31 25 25 Lower NO – Priva No 1.00 1999 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4030 FABIAN WY 94303 12715010 0.55 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower NO – Priva No 0.93 1959 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM TRANSPORT ST 94303 14702017 0.66 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3940 Fabian Wy 94303 12737023 1.27 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 50 40 40 Lower NO – Priva No 0.51 1991 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3960 Fabian Wy 94303 12737019 0.68 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 21 21 Lower NO – Priva No 0.45 1995 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3980 Fabian Wy 94303 12737018 0.69 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 22 22 Lower NO – Priva No 1.01 1995 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 811 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737016 0.54 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower NO – Priva No 0.21 1972 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4045 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701070 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower NO – Priva No 1.26 1957 AE10.6 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4007 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701097 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower NO – Priva No 1.26 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4083 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701116 0.51 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower NO – Priva No 1.50 1980 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM ‐ Lower Income 7.87 248

GM 951 Commercial St 94303 14701095 0.50 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.72 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 937 Commercial St 94303 14701023 0.32 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.00 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 916 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701008 0.33 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.91 1974 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM Fabian Wy 94303 12737007 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM Fabian Wy 94303 12737005 0.40 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3997 Fabian Wy 94303 12737003 0.28 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM E Charleston Rd 94303 12737002 0.22 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 849 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737001 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.47 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 830 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715049 0.27 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.25 1961 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 860 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715002 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.11 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4055 Fabian Wy 94303 12715006 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.69 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 870 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715003 0.46 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.77 2005 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 835 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715004 0.40 LI GM Gas station (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.05 1968 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 825 San Antonio Rd #A 94303 12715005 0.21 LI GM Two story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.17 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 821 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715046 0.32 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.20 1955 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 809 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 12715050 0.37 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.89 1956 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 801 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715041 0.20 LI GM Faith‐based insitution (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.43 1957 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 799 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715042 0.23 LI GM One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.76 1960 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 797 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715043 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.43 1962 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM ‐ Moderate Income 5.87 179

GM San Antonio Rd 94303 14701105 0.10 LI GM Vacant 40 32 0 3 3 3 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4075 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701079 0.16 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.39 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 989 Commercial St 94303 14701016 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.13 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 977 Commercial St 94303 14701018 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.46 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4067 Transport St 94303 14701099 0.25 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.08 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4051 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701068 0.26 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.77 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4047 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701069 0.25 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.48 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4039 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701072 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.33 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4035 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701073 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.63 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4019 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701096 0.31 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.35 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4030 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701013 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.13 1954 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 999 Commercial St 94303 14701122 0.30 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.9), surface parking 40 32 0 11 9 9 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.00 1966 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 991 Commercial St 94303 14701123 0.35 LI GM One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.79 2005 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4041 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701071 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.50 1959 AE10.5 Keith ReckdahlGM 936 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701059 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.86 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 940 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701060 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.50 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 947 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701085 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.75 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 949 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701043 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.84 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 974 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701040 0.35 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 0.10 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 966 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701039 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.06 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 952 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701038 0.30 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 AboveModerate NO – Priva No 1.36 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM ‐ Above Moderate Income 5.35 163

GM ‐ Total 19.09 590

General Manufacturing (GM) Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 276

Category

/Strategy

Site

Address

or Street

Zip Code APN AcresGeneral

PlanZoning

Current

Use

Minimum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximu

m

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowabl

e Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximu

m

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income

Category

Publicly

Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILR Year BuiltFloodzon

e

TCAC

Opportun

ity Area

WG

Member

Who

Recomm

ended

Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

ROLM 1035 E Me 94303 12710056 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower NO – Priva No 0.54 2014 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1051 E Me 94303 12710082 1.07 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 42 34 34 Lower NO – Priva No 0.42 2014 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1053 E ME 94303 12710081 1.60 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 64 51 51 Lower NO – Priva No 0.42 1970 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1085 E Me 94303 12710110 1.43 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 57 45 45 Lower NO – Priva No 0.28 1975 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 3600 W Ba 94303 12710076 2.08 RO ROLM Two story office space 40 32 0 83 66 66 Lower NO – Priva No 1.12 1990 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 3500 W Ba 94303 12736031 1.40 RO ROLM Two story office space 40 32 0 56 44 44 Lower YES – City No 0.84 1980 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 3460 W Ba 94303 12736029 1.49 RO ROLM Two story office space 40 32 0 59 47 47 Lower NO – Priva No 1.00 1970 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 3350 W Ba 94303 12736040 3.96 RO ROLM Two story office space 40 32 0 158 126 126 Lower NO – Priva No 0.67 1983 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1020 E Me 94303 12710103 2.50 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 99 79 79 Lower NO – Priva No 0.40 1975 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1036 E Me 94303 12710094 3.06 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 122 97 97 Lower NO – Priva No 0.58 1965 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1050 E Me 94303 12710099 2.62 RO ROLM Two story office space 40 32 0 104 83 83 Lower NO – Priva No 0.44 1968 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1052 E Me 94303 12710084 0.94 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 37 30 30 Lower NO – Priva No 0.48 1969 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1060 E Me 94303 12710049 1.13 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 45 36 36 Lower NO – Priva No 0.77 1964 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1066 E Me 94303 12710050 2.15 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 85 68 68 Lower NO – Priva No 0.89 1976 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1068 E Me 94303 12710051 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower NO – Priva No 0.60 1974 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM 1076 E Me 94303 12710072 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower NO – Priva No 0.71 1961 AE10.5 High ResouKeith ReckdahlROLM ‐ Lower Income 28.42 902

Research, Office, Limited Manufacturing (ROLM) Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 277



Minimum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowabl

e Density

(du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximu

m

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing


Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILRYear

BuiltFloodzone

TCAC

Opportu

nity Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservation

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

Stanford Sites Pasteur Drive + 1100 Welch Road 14223026 2.30 MISP;MF RM‐40 Portable structures, surface parking 31 40 32 0 425 Above Moderate NO – Priv No X

Stanford Sites 3128 El Camino Real 94306 14220035, 1.23 CS CS One story fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 144 Above Moderate Yes 0.94 1974 X

Stanford Sites Palo Alto Transit Center12031021, 12031010 4.50 MISP PF Transit center & hisotric building (MacArthur Park) 30 24 0 270 Above Moderate

YES – CityNo X Category 1; On the NRHP (Southern Pacific Rail Road Depot)

Stanford Sites‐ Above Moderate Income 3.53 839

Stanford Sites ‐ Total 3.53 839

Stanford University Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 278

Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General

Plan

Zoning Current Use Minimum Density

Allowed (du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density (du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income Category Publicly Owned Included in

5th Cycle

HE

ILR Year

Built

Floodzone TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member Who

Recommended Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

Staff Suggested Sites 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 11 NO – Privately Owned No 0.63 1975 X

Staff Suggested Sites 300 LAMBERT AV 94306 13238061 0.33 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 11 NO – Privately Owned No 0.94 1970 X

Staff Suggested Sites 955 ALMA ST 94301 12028096 0.24 SOFA II CART‐35 Vacant one story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 10 NO – Privately Owned No 1.65 1947 X

Staff Suggested Sites 980 Middlefield 94301 12005077 0.51 MF PC‐2152 One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 16 NO – Privately Owned No 1951 X

Staff Suggested Sites 550 Hamilton 94301 12004005 1.32 CC PC‐2545 three story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 43 NO – Privately Owned No 0.85 1971 X

Staff Suggested Sites 3300 El Camino Real 94306 14220046 3.01 RO RP Surface parking 40 32 0 120 96 92 NO – Privately Owned No This site has been broken out seperatelyStaff Suggested Sites ‐ Above Moderate Income 183

Staff Suggested Sites ‐ Total 183

Staff Suggested Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 279



Minimum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Maximum

Density Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density (du/ac)

Existing

Units

Maximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing


Owned

Included

in 5th

Cycle HE

ILRYear

Built

Floodzon

e

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member

Who

Recommended

Site

Retail

Preservation

Within 150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

MFA 160 FOREST AV 94301 12027047 0.66SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story VC firm (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 50 40 0 32 26 26 Lower No 1.06 1926 X High Resource

MFA 3877 EL CAMINO REAL 94303 13241091 0.75 MF;CS RM‐30; CS Vacant 31 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.36 1920 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA Leghorn St 94303 14705012 0.85 CS CS Auto storage 40 32 0 33 27 27 Lower No 0 1900 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 624 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003040 0.15 MF RM‐40 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6) 31 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.33 1926 X;AH47 High ResourceMFA 426 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015039 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story commercial building (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.32 1920 X High ResourceMFA 436 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015040 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.00 1951 X High ResourceMFA 401 Waverley St 94301 12015007 0.22 CC CD‐C (P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate Yes 1.09 1977 X High Resource Yes

MFA 425 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015036 0.09 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 3 2 2 Moderate No 1.00 1908 X High ResourceMFA 630 Cowper St 94301 12016011 0.34 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.45 1956 X High Resource Yes

MFA 330 LYTTON AV 94301 12015003 0.16 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.46 1957 X High ResourceMFA 318 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015058 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes

MFA 328 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12015059 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant /retail (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.53 1926 X High Resource Yes

MFA 550 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015084 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.91 1952 X High ResourceMFA 560 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015085 0.14 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Two story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.89 1938 X High ResourceMFA 530 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003031 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.69 1957 X High ResourceMFA 546 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003033 0.10 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.54 1955 X High Resource Yes

MFA 635 Waverley St 94301 12016020 0.31 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 0.91 1966 X High Resource Yes

MFA 130 Lytton Av 94301 12026002 0.34 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate Yes 0.00 1984 X High Resource Yes

MFA 654 HIGH ST 94301 12027037 0.19 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No 0.04 1900 X High Resource Yes

MFA 435 TASSO ST 94301 12003025 0.33 CC CD‐C (P) Three story office space (FAR: 2.0) 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 1.50 1984 X High Resource Yes

MFA 555 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003024 0.17 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.01 1970 X High Resource Yes

MFA 439 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015078 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.07 0 X High ResourceMFA 515 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015081 0.18 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceMFA 527 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015080 0.16 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceMFA 701 Emerson St 94301 12027049 0.22SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story spa (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 11 8 8 Moderate Yes 0.98 2003 X High ResourceMFA 721 Emerson St 94301 12027072 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.80 2003 X High ResourceMFA 999 Alma St 94301 12028095 0.24SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story fitness center (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.30 1952 X High ResourceMFA 1015 ALMA ST 94301 12030049 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story commercial (FAR: 0.2) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 1.25 1955 X High ResourceMFA 1027 Alma St 94301 12030048 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.79 1956 X High ResourceMFA 718 Emerson St 94301 12027073 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story auto repair (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.54 1950 X High ResourceMFA 840 Emerson St 94301 12028037 0.48SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 24 19 19 Moderate Yes 0.03 1959 X High ResourceMFA 849 High St 94301 12028040 0.24SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.49 1950 X High ResourceMFA 926 Emerson St 94301 12028085 0.11SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Two story office space, cleaners (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.34 1962 X High ResourceMFA 901 High St 94301 12028050 0.32SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate Yes 0.01 1900 X High ResourceMFA 925 High St 94301 12028091 0.14SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto Storage 50 40 0 7 5 5 Moderate Yes 0.01 0 X High ResourceMFA 929 HIGH ST 94301 12028090 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.20 1955 X High ResourceMFA 975 HIGH ST 94301 12028089 0.35SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 50 40 0 17 14 14 Moderate Yes 0.47 1968 X High ResourceMFA 940 High St 94301 12028092 0.18SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.63 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 960 High St 94301 12028093 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 6 4 4 Moderate Yes 0.59 1947 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 190 CHANNING AV 94301 12028051 0.17SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.02 1900 X High ResourceMFA 917 Alma St 94301 12028097 0.24SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 12 9 9 Moderate Yes 1.20 1929 X High ResourceMFA 660 HIGH ST 94301 12027039 0.14SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.30 1946 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998MFA 853 ALMA ST 94301 12028046 0.16SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.11 1927 X High ResourceMFA 875 ALMA ST 94301 12028045 0.32SOFA II CAP RT‐50 One story retail (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 50 40 0 16 12 12 Moderate No 0.79 1949 X High ResourceMFA 2011 El Camino Real 94306 12431024 0.20 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Moderate No 0.62 1930 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 2905 El Camino Real 94306 13237033 0.33 CS CS One story commercial space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.18 1950 X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes

MFA 615 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701103 0.25 MF RMD Residential (1) 17 13.6 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.29 1924 X High ResourceMFA 546 OXFORD AV 94306 13701004 0.15 MF RMD One story office space (FAR: 0.6) 17 13.6 0 2 2 2 Above Moderate No 0.40 1952 X High ResourceMFA 444 GRANT AV 94306 12433035 0.19 MF RM‐40 Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.31 1957 X High ResourceMFA 466 GRANT AV 94306 12433037 0.19 MF RM‐40 Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1900 X High ResourceMFA 573 LYTTON AV 94301 12010034 0.21 MF RM‐40 Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.18 1960 X High ResourceMFA 464 FOREST AV 94301 12016044 0.23 SOFA I CAP RM‐40 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 31 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.39 1952 X High ResourceMFA 609 COWPER ST 94301 12004001 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.27 1921 X High Resource Yes

MFA 486 HAMILTON AV 94301 12016008 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story retail and restaurant (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.00 1956 X High ResourceMFA 440 KIPLING ST 94301 12015027 0.11 CC CD‐C (P) One story salon (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.62 1946 X High ResourceMFA 439 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12015034 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.66 1949 X High ResourceMFA 543 COWPER ST 94301 12003067 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 1.47 1978 X High ResourceMFA 525 ALMA ST 94301 12026109 0.25 CC CD‐C (P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate Yes 1.39 1948 X High ResourceMFA 654 GILMAN ST 94301 12016032 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.24 1950 X High ResourceMFA 550 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003035 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.97 1955 X High Resource Yes

MFA 628 WAVERLEY ST 94301 12016021 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.22 1904 X High Resource Yes

MFA 821 EMERSON ST 94301 12028036 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.32 1966 X High ResourceMFA 829 Emerson St 94301 12028099 0.19SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story retail / office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate Yes 0.90 1962 X High ResourceMFA 839 Emerson St 94301 12028033 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.03 1959 X High ResourceMFA 847 EMERSON ST 94301 12028032 0.08SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.05 1924 X High ResourceMFA 160 Homer Av 94301 12028004 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.05 1900 X High ResourceMFA HIGH ST 94301 12028042 0.16SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 50 40 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.03 1900 X High ResourceMFA 933 EMERSON ST 94301 12028081 0.11SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story salon (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 0.59 1950 X High ResourceMFA 943 Emerson St 94301 12028080 0.11SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate Yes 1.05 1902 X High ResourceMFA 444 COWPER ST 94301 12015014 0.14 CC CD‐C (P) Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.04 1900 X High ResourceMFA 2098 El Camino Real 94306 13701112 0.10 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate No 0.94 1952 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 1955 El Camino Real 94306 12430016 0.12 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8) 20 16 0 2 1 1 Above Moderate No 0.96 1951 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 163 EVERETT AV 94301 12025042 0.19 CN CD‐N One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 20 16 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.70 1951 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur KarahanMFA El Camino Real 94306 14220080 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 30 24 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 0 N/A X High Resource Keith Reckdahl Yes

MFA 2227 El Camino Real 94306 12432071 0.10 CC CC (2) One story retail (FAR: 0.7) 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.92 1946 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 929 EMERSON ST 94301 12028082 0.12SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1912 X High Resource Rahsan Hosgur KarahanStaff Suggested Sites 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 11 0.63 1975 X

Staff Suggested Sites 300 LAMBERT AV 94306 13238061 0.33 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 11 0.94 1970 X

Staff Suggested Sites 955 ALMA ST 94301 12028096 0.24 SOFA II CAPRT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 10 1.65 1947 X

Staff Suggested Sites 980 Middlefield 94301 12005077 0.51 MF PC‐2152 One story commercial space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 16 1951 X

Staff Suggested Sites 550 Hamilton 94301 12004005 1.32 CC PC‐2545 Three story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 43 0.85 1971 X

Staff Suggested Sites 3300 El Camino Real 94306 14220046 3.01 RO RP Surface parking 40 32 0 120 96 92 This site has been broken out seperatelyUpzone 850 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005011 0.66 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva No 0.47 1955 X High ResourceUpzone 652 HOMER AV 94301 12005008 0.64 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva No 0.36 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 4146 El Camino Real 94301 13724034 0.77 MF RM‐20 Vacant 8 30 24 0 23 18 18 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 X High ResourceUpzone 1681 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12425044 0.91 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 21 21 Lower NO – Priva No 0.11 1939 X High ResourceUpzone 853 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332094 0.80 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.57 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 4151 Middlefield Rd 94301 12715023 0.93 MF RM‐20 Two story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 27 22 22 Lower NO – Priva Yes 1.26 1961 X High ResourceUpzone 3606 El Camino Real 94301 13708080 0.65 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4085 El Camino Wy 94306 132431530.71

CN CN

One story retail Goodwill Donation Center (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 21 17 17 Lower

NO – PrivaYes 0.71 1985 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4113 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244022 0.64 CN CN One story preshcool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 19 15 15 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2754 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13255029 0.55 CN CN (GF/P) One story Retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 16 13 13 Lower NO – Priva No 0.61 1952 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2811 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734098 1.74 CN CN (GF/P) Supermarket (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 52 41 41 Lower NO – Priva No 0.10 1964 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3902 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708048 4.26 CN CN (GF/P) One story strip mall (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 127 102 102 Lower NO – Priva No 0.08 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3901 El Camino Real 94301 13242073 1.10 MF RM‐30 One story Hotel (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower NO – Priva Yes 1.09 1956 X High ResourceUpzone EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13238072 1.11 MF;CS RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 44 35 35 Lower NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 320 SAN ANTONIO RD 94306 14709069 0.76 MF;RO RM‐30 Vacant Street curbside 16 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3375 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13239088 0.74 CS;CN CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 29 23 23 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.30 1971 X High Resource Yes Yes

Complete List of Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 280

Upzone 4224 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 16708037 0.63 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4230 El Camino Real 94301 16708030 0.52 CS CS One story car rental (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.05 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3903 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13242072 0.53 CS CS One retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 21 16 16 Lower NO – Priva No 1.06 1997 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220037 0.61 CS CS Two story lodging Hotel Parmani(FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.32 1947 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4238 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708031 0.65 CS CS Two story lodging, The Palo Alto Inn (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower NO – Priva No 0.37 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4256 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 16708042 0.60 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 24 19 19 Lower NO – Priva No 0.09 1964 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4279 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14801016 0.80 CS CS Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 32 25 25 Lower NO – Priva No 0.52 1961 X;ACr High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14809011 0.95 CS CS

Two story lodging The Palo Alto Country Inn (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 38 30 30 Lower

NO – PrivaNo 0.38 1953 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 760 San Antonio RD 94303 14705091 0.65 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 26 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.49 1975 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 87 ENCINA AV 94301 12033001 0.57 CS CS

Two story medical office space Palo Alto Medical Foundation Cardiac Care Center (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower

NO – PrivaNo 1.27 1947 X High Resource

Upzone 4291 El Camino Real 94301 14809014 1.16 CS CS Two story bank (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 46 37 37 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.33 1957 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 720 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 14705087 1.36 CS CS One story retail space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 54 43 43 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.44 1965 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 841 El Camino Real 94301 12034001 0.64 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower NO – Priva Yes 0.00 1973 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 788 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703041 0.58 CS CS One story substandard office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower NO – Priva No 0.82 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 884 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12005012 0.23 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.69 1953 X High ResourceUpzone 655 HOMER AV 94301 12004057 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 744 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004053 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.69 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 702 CLARA DR 94303 12735023 0.29 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.30 1954 X High ResourceUpzone 116 COLERIDGE AV 94301 12417003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.09 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 3400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13708006 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.28 1953 X High ResourceUpzone 649 FOREST AV 94301 12004019 0.29 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1918 AH43.5 High ResourceUpzone 427 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009036 0.20 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 4 3 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.33 1968 X High ResourceUpzone 453 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009034 0.21 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.97 1958 X High ResourceUpzone 660 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12004017 0.29 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.29 1951 AH42.8 High ResourceUpzone 741 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332040 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.83 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 827 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00332064 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.21 1926 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 905 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00333013 0.27 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.31 1952 X High ResourceUpzone 3200 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 13210148 0.37 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.5) 8 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.68 1957 X High ResourceUpzone 127 RINCONADA AV 94301 12418095 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.14 1932 X High ResourceUpzone 114 SEALE AV 94301 12418050 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.55 1962 X High ResourceUpzone 119 SEALE AV 94301 12418045 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.53 1966 X High ResourceUpzone 125 SEALE AV 94301 12418044 0.21 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.25 1962 X High ResourceUpzone 424 SENECA ST 94301 00303013 0.28 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 6 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.15 1903 A High ResourceUpzone 660 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003043 0.20 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 6 4 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.01 1900 AH46.9 High ResourceUpzone 680 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12003044 0.22 MF RM‐20 One story medical offices (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 8 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.13 1952 AH46.9 High ResourceUpzone 116 EMERSON ST 94301 12024019 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.92 1922 X High ResourceUpzone 124 EMERSON ST 94301 12024020 0.24 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.35 1926 X High ResourceUpzone 2741 MIDDLEFIELD AV 94306 12734095 0.22 CN CN (GF/P) Two story retail / office space (FAR: 0.5) 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.43 1956 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3900 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94303 14708049 0.29 CN CN (GF/P) One story cleaners (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 8 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.07 1958 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 720 Cowper St 94301 12016046 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.49 1973 X High ResourceUpzone 575 Middlefield Rd 94301 00302043 0.28 MF RM‐30 Two story medical office (FAR: 1.5) 16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1963 AH45.3 High ResourceUpzone 720 University Av 94301 00302047 0.41 MF RM‐30 One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.37 1954 AH46.6 High ResourceUpzone 417 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432026 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.60 1948 X High ResourceUpzone 747 COLORADO AV 94303 12734100 0.27 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 10 8 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.58 1965 X High ResourceUpzone 744 COWPER ST 94301 12016049 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.31 1920 X High ResourceUpzone 245 EL CARMELO AV 94306 13219063 0.24 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.38 1953 X High ResourceUpzone 463 LYTTON AV 94301 12014062 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.57 1938 X High ResourceUpzone 227 RAMONA ST 94301 12025014 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.70 1961 X High ResourceUpzone 827 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00303018 0.37 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 14 11 10 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.10 1955 AH45.5 High ResourceUpzone 447 LELAND AV 94306 12430018 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.75 1924 X High ResourceUpzone 701 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00302022 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1959 AH48 High ResourceUpzone 725 University Av 94301 00302021 0.25 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.41 1954 AH47.9 High ResourceUpzone 435 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 00302023 0.23 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.91 1961 AH48.1 High ResourceUpzone 2181 PARK BL 94306 12427038 0.25 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.07 1957 X High ResourceUpzone 3691 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240062 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.92 1946 X High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 3636 El Camino Real 94301 13708078 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.09 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3666 El Camino Real 94301 13708097 0.25 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.46 1931 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3773 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13241083 0.42 CN CN One story multiple retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.33 1949 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3630 El Camino Real 94301 13708081 0.37 CN CN Two story office space (FAR 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.39 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2127 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12431059 0.25 CN CN One story restaurant and office space (0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.91 1940 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2137 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431058 0.32 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 0.01 1900 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3601 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13240059 0.42 CN CN Gas Station 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.00 1966 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 1921 El Camino Real 94301 12430017 0.43 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.98 1945 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2280 El Camino Real 94301 13701113 0.43 CN CN Fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.07 1969 X High ResourceUpzone 3700 El Camino Real 94301 13711078 0.36 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 10 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.01 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4127 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 132461040.45

CN CN Two story restaurant and office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 30 24 0 13 10 10 ModerateNO – Priva

Yes 0.14 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2080 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701132 0.31 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 30 24 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva No 1.18 1961 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4335 El Camino Real 94301 14809010 0.40 CS CS One story spa (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.21 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 268 Lambert Av 94306 13238048 0.35 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.65 1963 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 320 Lambert Av 94306 13238058 0.28 CS CS One story vacant retail (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.42 1978 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 4201 Middlefield 94301 14705086 0.32 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.09 1992 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 780 San Antonio Ave 94303 14705092 0.42 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.14 1988 X High Resource YesUpzone 3508 El Camino Real 94301 13708088 0.24 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.16 1950 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 111 LOWELL AV 94301 12417034 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.45 1922 X High ResourceUpzone 121 LOWELL AV 94301 12417033 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.18 1932 X High ResourceUpzone 2225 ALMA ST 94301 12420001 0.16 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.11 1954 X High ResourceUpzone 103 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417077 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.11 1970 X High ResourceUpzone 111 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417076 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1953 X High ResourceUpzone 122 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419003 0.23 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.78 1925 X High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 652 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004010 0.31 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 9 7 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.33 1941 AH44.7 High ResourceUpzone MIDDLEFIELD RD 94301 12003046 0.13 MF RM‐20 Surface Parking 8 30 24 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.02 1900 AH46.1 High ResourceUpzone EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239075 0.18 CN CN Surface Parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone KENDALL AV 94306 13708033 0.13 CN CN Vacant 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 564 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701036 0.13 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.5) 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.47 1949 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3972 El Camino Real 94301 137110910.25

CN CN One story auto repair and gas station (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 30 24 0 7 6 6 Above ModerateNO – Priva

Yes 0.27 1959 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 706 COLORADO AV 94306 12734092 0.18 CN CN (GF/P) One story retail/restaurant (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.27 1954 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 708 COLORADO AV 94306 12734054 0.13 CN CN (GF/P) One story convience store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 30 24 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.14 1968 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 2801 MIDDLEFIELD RD 94306 12734052 0.17 CN CN (GF/P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 30 24 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.00 1986 X High ResourceUpzone 740 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004071 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.11 1921 X High ResourceUpzone 750 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004072 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.25 1974 X High ResourceUpzone 397 Curtner Ave. 94306 13241025 0.19 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 40 32 2 7 6 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.73 1954 X High ResourceUpzone 202 BRYANT ST 94301 12025159 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.61 1918 X High ResourceUpzone 122 COLORADO AV 94301 13225049 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.20 1951 X High ResourceUpzone 343 COWPER ST 94301 12010044 0.19 MF RM‐30 Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.13 1907 X High ResourceUpzone 262 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12025158 0.16 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.97 1918 X High ResourceUpzone 636 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004027 0.19 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 7 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.40 1909 X High ResourceUpzone 727 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004066 0.14 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.00 1993 X High ResourceUpzone 590 FOREST ST 94301 12004043 0.22 MF RM‐30 One story medical office (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 16 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.67 1949 X High ResourceUpzone 305 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428015 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.54 1968 X High ResourceUpzone 325 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428013 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.23 1938 X High ResourceUpzone 718A WEBSTER ST 94301 12004068 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.47 1900 X High Resource

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 281

Upzone 730 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004069 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.33 1900 X High ResourceUpzone 371 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432031 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.08 1949 X High ResourceUpzone 383 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432030 0.20 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.01 1931 X High ResourceUpzone 634 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004009 0.29 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 11 9 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.95 1960 AH44.7 High ResourceUpzone 643 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004022 0.23 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.03 1903 AH43.6 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 746 BRYANT ST 94301 12027056 0.16 SOFA I CAP RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.73 1934 X High ResourceUpzone 727 RAMONA ST 94301 12027064 0.12 SOFA I CAP RM‐30 Surface parking 16 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone 3337 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239005 0.17 CS CS Two story vacant office space (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.72 1938 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3839 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241089 0.17 CS CS One story auto repair (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.68 1947 X High Resource Yes Yes



Upzone 75 ENCINA AV 94301 12033003 0.13 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.44 1958 X High ResourceUpzone 411 LAMBERT AV 94306 13239017 0.16 CS CS Two story gym (FAR: 0.6), vacant 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone MATADERO AV 94306 13708016 0.11 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3260 Ash St 94306 13238047 0.22 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.49 1998 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 460 Lambert Av 94306 13238017 0.22 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.08 1937 X High ResourceUpzone 814 SAN ANTONIO Rd 94303 14703043 0.43 CS CS One story car rental office (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.42 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 816‐814 San Antonio Rd 94303 14703039 0.44 CS CS One story car rental (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.38 1956 X High ResourceUpzone 824 San Antonio Rd 94303 14703040 0.44 CS CS Two story office space (FAR 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.00 1986 X High ResourceUpzone 840 San Antonio Rd 94303 14703064 0.49 CS CS Gas Station, auto repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1962 AE10.5 High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034004 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034005 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034006 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.04 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034007 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.04 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034008 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034009 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceUpzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034010 0.13 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceUpzone 44 ENCINA AV 94301 12034002 0.18 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1949 X High ResourceUpzone 2290 BIRCH ST 94306 12432002 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story medical office (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.17 1957 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 400 Cambridge Av 94306 12432006 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.21 1971 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 430 Cambridge Av 94306 12432009 0.14 CC CC (2)(R) One story tutoring center/ office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 1.33 1958 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 456 Cambridge Av 94306 12432012 0.16 CC CC (2)(R) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.82 1951 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 310 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432034 0.27 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 2.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.74 1945 X High ResourceUpzone 3516 El Camino Real 94301 13708079 0.23 CS CS One story retail space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.10 1946 X High Resource Yes Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Upzone 4191 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13246120 0.36 CS CS One story dentist and fitness center (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.56 1966 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4195 El Camino Real 94301 13246119 0.35 CS CS One story auto‐repair (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.89 1989 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 4232 El Camino Real 94301 16708036 0.43 CS CS One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.08 1954 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 805 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033012 0.24 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.56 1940 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12033011 0.20 CS CS One story medcial offices (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.37 1955 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 3339 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239074 0.36 CS CS One story lodging Berbeda Place (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.75 1955 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3345 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239080 0.22 CS CS One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.37 1968 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 3825 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 13241088 0.35 CS CS One story physical therapy (FAR: 0.4), Surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.20 1963 X High Resource Yes Yes

Upzone 455 Lambert Av 94306 13239087 0.32 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.57 1965 X High ResourceUpzone 3200 Ash St 94306 13238045 0.39 CS CS One story office space FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 15 12 12 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.20 1975 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 425 Portage Av 94306 13238068 0.40 CS CS One story fitness center (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 16 12 12 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.12 1951 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 27 ENCINA AV 94301 12033010 0.16 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 1900 X High ResourceUpzone 414 California Av 94306 12432040 0.37 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.34 1958 X High ResourceUpzone 910 Charleston Rd 94303 14703065 0.48 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.33 1978 AE10.5 High ResourceUpzone 63 ENCINA AV 94301 12033004 0.27 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 1.17 1941 X High ResourceUpzone 2401 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433061 0.24 CC CC One story Bank (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.56 1975 X High ResourceUpzone 855 EL CAMINO REAL 94301 12034014 0.44 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate NO – Priva Yes 0.00 1958 X High Resource

Upzone ENCINA AV 94301 12034003 0.25 CC CC Surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate NO – Priva No 0.00 0 X High ResourceCaltrain Station PARK BL 94306 13232043 1.38 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 55 44 44 Lower No 1950 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220012 0.75 CS CS (AS1) Two Story Office Building 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 1.01 0 High Resource Yes Yes

Caltrain Station 2673 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13236077 0.64 CN CN One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower Yes 0.59 1970 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 2310 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701129 0.76 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower Yes 1.39 1924 High ResourceCaltrain Station 300 HAMILTON AV 94301 12016096 0.75 CC CD‐C (P); PF Five story office building (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 1.49 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station 530 LYTTON AV 94301 12003070 0.67 CC CD‐C (P) Four story office building (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower No 1906 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station Cambridge ave 94306 12432050 0.65 CC PF(R) Parking structure 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower No 1910 High ResourceCaltrain Station 3197 PARK BL 94306 13226076 0.59 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower No 1.43 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 156 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428045 1.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story grocery store (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 50 40 0 57 45 45 Lower Yes 0.30 1950 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 150 GRANT AV 94306 12429020 0.60 CC CC (2)(R) One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 29 23 23 Lower No 0.23 1979 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station NITA AV 94306 14709056 1.25 RO ROLM Surface Parking 50 40 0 62 50 50 Lower No 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 360 FOREST AV 94301 12016070 0.23 MF RM‐40 Residential (2) 31 40 32 2 9 7 5 Moderate No 1.04 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station PARK BL 94306 13232042 0.28 MF RM‐30 Surface Parking 16 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 1961 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2805 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237067 0.39 CS CS One story retail (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.92 1946 High Resource Yes Yes

Caltrain Station 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052 0.33 CS CS One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 0.63 0 High Resource Yes Yes

Caltrain Station 1885 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430060 0.13 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 1.50 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 1895 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430061 0.16 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 1.49 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 305 LYTTON AV 94301 12014101 0.23 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.14 1980 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 321 HAMILTON AV 94301 12015090 0.23 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant and retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.75 1947 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 490 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432046 0.33 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Three store office space and retail (FAR: 1.2) 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 1.30 1955 High ResourceCaltrain Station 447 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433016 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.57 1900 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 451 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433015 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.45 1962 High ResourceCaltrain Station 441 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433017 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.95 1954 High ResourceCaltrain Station 445 SHERMAN AV 94306 12433043 0.28 CC CC (2) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.61 1975 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 2455 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12433008 0.38 CC CC (2) Two story lodging (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.10 1970 High ResourceCaltrain Station YALE ST 94306 13701078 0.14 CN CN Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 1958 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 577 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701125 0.44 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Moderate Yes 1.24 1958 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 2200 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701070 0.41 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 16 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.19 1990 High ResourceCaltrain Station 555 COLLEGE AV 94306 13701069 0.48 CN CN Single story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 19 15 15 Moderate Yes 0.57 1958 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2000 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13701116 0.27 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate Yes 1.14 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 1963 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12430015 0.28 CN CN Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 11 9 9 Moderate Yes 0.05 1950 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 100 ADDISON AV 94301 12030050 0.24SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story preschool (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1980 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2041 ALMA ST 94301 12419054 0.20 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 10 8 6 Moderate No 0.90 1954 High ResourceCaltrain Station 324 EMERSON ST 94301 12025094 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.43 1911 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 318 EMERSON ST 94301 12025093 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.97 1900 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2151 PARK BL 94306 12427039 0.26 MF RM‐30 Two story office building (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 16 50 40 0 12 10 10 Moderate Yes 1.05 1958 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2211 PARK BL 94306 12428043 0.35 MF RM‐30 One stury office building (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 16 50 40 0 17 13 13 Moderate Yes 0.33 1956 High ResourceCaltrain Station 221 BRYANT ST 94301 12014011 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.08 1928 High ResourceCaltrain Station 197 BRYANT ST 94301 12012022 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 1.49 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station 343 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12012019 0.25 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 10 8 6 Above Moderate No 1.35 1959 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2861 ALMA ST 94306 13226023 0.19 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 7 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.78 1956 High ResourceCaltrain Station 733 RAMONA ST 94301 12027063 0.10 MF RM‐30 Vacant 16 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 1906 High ResourceCaltrain Station Ash St 94306 13236024 0.10 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station ENCINA AV 94301 12034013 0.09 CC CC Surface Parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 1947 High ResourceCaltrain Station 425 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433019 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.15 0 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 2305 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12432049 0.11 CC CC (2)(R) One story restaurant retail (FAR: 1.0) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.34 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 463 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433013 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.02 1953 High ResourceCaltrain Station 461 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433014 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.83 1953 High ResourceCaltrain Station 415 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 12432052 0.13 CC CC (2)(R) Two story vacant office building (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.87 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station 440 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432041 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.22 1959 High ResourceCaltrain Station 576 CAMBRIDGE AV 94306 13701075 0.19 CN CN Two store office space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.21 1958 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 2001 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 12431025 0.18 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.18 1953 High Resource Yes

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 282

Caltrain Station 280 LAMBERT AV 94306 13238043 0.09 CS CS Auto Care with Surface Parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 0 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 2904 ASH ST 94306 13237041 0.18 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.73 1998 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 160 HOMER AV 94301 12028005 0.14SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Surface Parking 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.03 1961 High ResourceCaltrain Station 145 ADDISON AV 94301 12028094 0.18SOFA II CAP RT‐35 One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.77 1950 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 828 BRYANT ST 94301 12028018 0.13 SOFA I CAP AMF One story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.72 1900 High ResourceCaltrain Station 3040 PARK BL 94306 13232036 0.17 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.90 1953 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 170 EMERSON ST 94301 12024025 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.72 1912 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2233 ALMA ST 94301 12420037 0.25 MF RM‐20 One story medical office space (FAR: 0.4) 8 50 40 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 0.26 1956 High ResourceCaltrain Station 106 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419001 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.06 1925 High ResourceCaltrain Station 114 RINCONADA AV 94301 12419002 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.40 1925 High ResourceCaltrain Station 230 EMERSON ST 94301 12025036 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 0.39 1901 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2155 ALMA ST 94301 12419108 0.13 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 0.29 1948 High ResourceCaltrain Station 326 BRYANT ST 94301 12025070 0.12 MF RM‐30 Two story medical office space (FAR: 0.7) 16 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.63 1946 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 330 BRYANT ST 94301 12065002 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 50 40 2 6 5 3 Above Moderate No 1.00 1982 High ResourceCaltrain Station 345 HIGH ST 94301 12025100 0.13 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Above Moderate No 1.08 1990 High ResourceCaltrain Station 102 COLORADO AV 94301 13225047 0.17 MF RM‐30 Residential (2) 16 50 40 2 8 6 4 Above Moderate No 1.13 1953 High ResourceCaltrain Station 255 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428021 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.11 1920 High ResourceCaltrain Station 267 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428019 0.11 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 1.07 1967 High ResourceCaltrain Station 355 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432001 0.15 MF RM‐30 Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 7 6 5 Above Moderate No 0.07 1928 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 404 SHERIDAN AV 94306 13236025 0.11 MF RM‐40 Surface Parking 31 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0 High ResourceCaltrain Station 240 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12428031 0.16 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail/ commercial space (FAR: 0.3) 50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.76 1962 High ResourceCaltrain Station 209 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429001 0.12 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.50 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 265 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429021 0.14 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.00 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 239 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429007 0.26 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail / commercial space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 13 10 10 Above Moderate Yes 1.20 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 261 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12429022 0.13 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.02 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 2453 ASH ST 94306 12433027 0.11 CC CC (2)(R)(P) Two story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.11 1958 High ResourceCaltrain Station 407 CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12433022 0.10 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.18 1902 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 2501 PARK BL 94306 12429012 0.12 CC CC (2)(R) Two story office building (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.93 1947 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station PARK BL 94306 12428003 0.29 CC CC (2)(R) Surface Parking 50 40 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate Yes 1900 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 360 N CALIFORNIA AV 94306 12432036 0.15 CC CC (2)(R)(P) One story retail (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.30 1953 High ResourceCaltrain Station 405 HIGH ST 94301 12026003 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Two‐story office space (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.30 1998 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 424 EMERSON ST 94301 12026025 0.09 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.05 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 227 FOREST AV 94301 12027017 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.32 1965 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 420 RAMONA ST 94301 12026013 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Three story bank (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.50 1951 High ResourceCaltrain Station 640 RAMONA ST 94301 12027015 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.00 1910 High ResourceCaltrain Station 635 HIGH ST 94301 12027034 0.12 CC CD‐C (P) One story office space (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.08 1946 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 203 FOREST AV 94301 12027018 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.30 1958 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 647 EMERSON ST 94301 12027019 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.35 1920 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 644 EMERSON ST 94301 12027027 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.12 1962 High ResourceCaltrain Station 532 BRYANT ST 94301 12026062 0.11 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story retail (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.24 1950 High ResourceCaltrain Station 117 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 12026039 0.10 CC CD‐C (P) Two story office space (FAR: 1.0) 50 40 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 0.38 1928 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 412 EMERSON ST 94301 12026106 0.15 CC CD‐C (GF)(P) One story restaurant (FAR: 0.9) 50 40 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.50 1958 High ResourceCaltrain Station 291 ALMA ST 94301 12025056 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) One story office building (FAR: 0.5) 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.01 1959 High ResourceCaltrain Station 247 HIGH ST 94301 12025044 0.09 CC CD‐N (P) One story dentist office (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 1.37 1915 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 251 HIGH ST 94301 12025043 0.19 CC CD‐N (P) One story dentist office (FAR: 0.8) 50 40 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.32 1956 High Resource Yes

Caltrain Station 328 HIGH ST 94301 12025106 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.03 1936 High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Caltrain Station 316 HIGH ST 94301 12025105 0.13 CC CD‐N (P) One story building with Surface Parking 50 40 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.04 1900 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor MAYBELL AV 94306 13724045 0.56 CN RM‐20 Surface parking 8 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower No 0.02 High ResourceTransit Corridor 561 VISTA AV 94306 13737004 0.65 MF RM‐30 One story Faith‐based insitution. Congregation Emek Beracha 16 40 32 0 25 20 20 Lower No 0.03 1975 High ResourceTransit Corridor 4170 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13724046 1.01 CS CS One story retail store (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 1.01 1996 High Resource Yes Yes

Transit Corridor 3150 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220054 0.75 CS CS One story Restaurant (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.65 1969 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 126 LOWELL AV 94301 12417042 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.13 1994 High ResourceTransit Corridor 120 LOWELL AV 94301 12417041 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.42 1988 High ResourceTransit Corridor 114 LOWELL AV 94301 12417040 0.17 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.45 1985 High ResourceTransit Corridor ARASTRADERO RD 94306 13724019 0.23 CS CS (AD) One story auto dealership (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor EL CAMINO REAL 94304 14220079 0.19 CS CS Vacant 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3265 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13238020 0.17 CS CS Surface parking, vacant 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.00 1960 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3160 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 14220055 0.29 CS CS Residential (2) 40 32 2 11 9 7 Moderate No 0.15 1950 High Resource YesTransit Corridor 3780 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711098 0.24 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate Yes 0.13 1950 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4113 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246116 0.21 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 1.09 1990 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4115 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246100 0.35 CN CN Vacant 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate No 1.04 1965 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3585 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240058 0.14 CN CN Misc. use 40 32 0 5 4 4 Moderate No 0.32 1946 High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Transit Corridor 3960 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711080 0.11 CN CN One story retail space (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.62 1952 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3924 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711084 0.16 CN CN Commercial (FAR: 0.98) one story restaurant 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.57 1934 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3916 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711087 0.16 CN CN Happy Donuts restaturant (0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Moderate No 0.34 1963 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3878 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711082 0.11 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.85 1940 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3876 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711081 0.11 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 1.18 1960 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3870 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711077 0.12 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.8) 40 32 0 4 3 3 Moderate No 0.93 1963 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3864 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711089 0.18 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Moderate No 1.19 1956 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4101 WISTERIA LN 94306 13737031 0.10 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 3 3 2 Above Moderate No 1.25 1999 High ResourceTransit Corridor 16 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424026 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.20 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Transit Corridor 12 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424025 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 5 4 2 Above Moderate No 0.09 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Transit Corridor 22 CHURCHILL AV 94306 12424027 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.73 1945 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Transit Corridor 211 MANZANITA AV 94306 12424008 0.14 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 5 4 3 Above Moderate No 0.99 1937 High Resource Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Transit Corridor 105 LOWELL AV 94301 12417035 0.11 MF RM‐20 Residential (1) 8 40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.11 1948 High ResourceTransit Corridor Lambert Avenue 94306 13238018 0.23 CS CS Surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.03 1955 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3897 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13241086 0.36 CS CS One story car wash (FAR: 0.2) 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.52 2000 High Resource Yes Yes

Transit Corridor 4143 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13246077 0.11 CN CN Residential (1) 40 32 1 4 3 2 Above Moderate No 0.88 1940 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711074 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3760 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711079 0.12 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 4 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.04 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3505 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240060 0.14 CN CN Two story office space (FAR: 0.3) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.26 1950 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3545 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13240063 0.14 CN CN Two story retail (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 5 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.34 1969 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4117 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246105 0.16 CN CN One story office space (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.85 1983 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4131 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244010 0.16 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.4) surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.43 1956 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4125 EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244012 0.18 CN CN One story art school (FAR: 0.7) 40 32 0 7 5 5 Above Moderate No 1.11 1955 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor EL CAMINO WY 94306 13244090 0.09 CN CN Surface parking 40 32 0 3 2 2 Above Moderate No 1900 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3487 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239078 0.20 CN CN Two story retail (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.60 1963 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3457 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13239077 0.15 CN CN One story retail (FAR: 0.6) 40 32 0 6 4 4 Above Moderate No 1.11 1950 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 3944 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13711085 0.22 CN CN One story retail space (FAR: 0.5) 40 32 0 8 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.49 1987 High Resource Yes

Transit Corridor 4123 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13246103 0.20 CN CN One story restaurant (FAR: 0.3)surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Above Moderate No 0.64 1960 High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 1985 Louis Rd 94303 00350022 1.09 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 32 26 26 Lower No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 1140 Cowper St 94301 12018048 0.61 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 18 14 14 Lower No High Resource Yes Category 2; Professorville (Designation applies to 457 building only)Faith‐Based Institutions 2890 Middlefield Rd 94306 13203193 0.76 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 22 18 18 Lower No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 3149 Waverley St 94306 13220161 0.69 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 20 16 16 Lower No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 3505 Middlefield Rd 94306 12747042 1.50 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 45 36 36 Lower No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 625 Hamilton Ave 94301 12003056 0.21 MF RM‐40 Faith‐based insitution 31 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 2490 Middlefield Rd 94301 13201083 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 687 Arastradero Rd 94306 16704013 0.26 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 7 6 6 Moderate No High Resource Yes Deemed NOT eligible for the CRHR or the NRHP in 1998Faith‐Based Institutions 865 Stanford Ave 94306 13702088 0.46 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 13 11 11 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Faith‐Based Institutions 1611 Standford Ave 94306 13707040 0.21 SF R‐1 Faith‐based insitution 30 24 0 6 5 5 Moderate No High Resource Yes

Stanford Sites Pasteur Drive + 1100 Welch Road 14223026 2.30 MISP;MF RM‐40 Portable structures, surface parking 31 40 32 0 425 Above Moderate No X High ResourceStanford Sites 3128 El Camino Real 94306 14220035, 14220079, 14220080 1.23 CS CS One story fast food restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 30 24 0 144 Above Moderate Yes 0.94 1974 X High ResourceStanford Sites Palo Alto Transit Center 12031021, 12031010 4.50 MISP PF Transit center & hisotric building (MacArthur Park) 30 24 0 180 Above Moderate No X High Resource Category 1; On the NRHP (Southern Pacific Rail Road Depot)

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 283

GM 950 INDUSTRIAL ST 94303 14701061 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 0.37 1972 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 937 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701086 0.57 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower No 0.21 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 990 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701041 0.79 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 31 25 25 Lower No 1.00 1999 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4030 FABIAN WY 94303 12715010 0.55 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 22 17 17 Lower No 0.93 1959 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM TRANSPORT ST 94303 14702017 0.66 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 26 21 21 Lower No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3940 Fabian Wy 94303 12737023 1.27 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 50 40 40 Lower No 0.51 1991 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3960 Fabian Wy 94303 12737019 0.68 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 21 21 Lower No 0.45 1995 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3980 Fabian Wy 94303 12737018 0.69 LI GM One story vacant office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 27 22 22 Lower No 1.01 1995 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 811 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737016 0.54 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 0.21 1972 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4045 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701070 0.54 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 1.26 1957 AE10.6 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4007 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701097 0.54 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 21 17 17 Lower No 1.26 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4083 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701116 0.51 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Lower No 1.50 1980 AE10.5 Keith ReckdahlGM 951 Commercial St 94303 14701095 0.50 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 20 16 16 Moderate No 0.72 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 937 Commercial St 94303 14701023 0.32 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate No 1.00 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 916 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14701008 0.33 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 0.91 1974 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM Fabian Wy 94303 12737007 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM Fabian Wy 94303 12737005 0.40 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 16 12 12 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 3997 Fabian Wy 94303 12737003 0.28 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 11 8 8 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM E Charleston Rd 94303 12737002 0.22 LI GM Surface parking 40 32 0 8 7 7 Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 849 E Charleston Rd 94303 12737001 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.47 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 830 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715049 0.27 LI GM One story auto repair (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Moderate No 0.25 1961 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 860 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715002 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.11 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4055 Fabian Wy 94303 12715006 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.69 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 870 E Charleston Rd 94303 12715003 0.46 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 18 14 14 Moderate No 0.77 2005 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 835 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715004 0.40 LI GM Gas station (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 15 12 12 Moderate No 0.05 1968 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 825 San Antonio Rd #A 94303 12715005 0.21 LI GM Three story vacant office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 1.17 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 821 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715046 0.32 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 12 10 10 Moderate No 1.20 1955 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 809 SAN ANTONIO RD 94303 12715050 0.37 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Moderate No 0.89 1956 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 801 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715041 0.20 LI GM Faith‐based insitution (FAR: 0.6), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Moderate No 1.43 1957 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 799 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715042 0.23 LI GM One story restaurant (FAR: 0.2), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 0.76 1960 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 797 San Antonio Rd 94303 12715043 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Moderate No 1.43 1962 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM San Antonio Rd 94303 14701105 0.10 LI GM Vacant 40 32 0 3 3 3 Above Moderate No 0.00 N/A AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4075 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701079 0.16 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 6 5 5 Above Moderate No 0.39 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 989 Commercial St 94303 14701016 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.13 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 977 Commercial St 94303 14701018 0.19 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 7 6 6 Above Moderate No 1.46 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4067 Transport St 94303 14701099 0.25 LI GM Two story medical office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 1.08 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4051 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701068 0.26 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.4), surface parking 40 32 0 10 8 8 Above Moderate No 0.77 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4047 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701069 0.25 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.48 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4039 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701072 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.33 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4035 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701073 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.63 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4019 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701096 0.31 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 0.35 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 4030 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701013 0.45 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.2), surface parking 40 32 0 17 14 14 Above Moderate No 1.13 1954 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlGM 999 Commercial St 94303 14701122 0.30 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 0.9), surface parking 40 32 0 11 9 9 Above Moderate No 1.00 1966 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 991 Commercial St 94303 14701123 0.35 LI GM One story preschool (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.79 2005 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 4041 TRANSPORT ST 94303 14701071 0.23 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.50 1959 AE10.5 Keith ReckdahlGM 936 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701059 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.86 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 940 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701060 0.24 LI GM Two story office space (FAR: 1.0), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.50 1958 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 947 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701085 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.75 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 949 INDUSTRIAL AV 94303 14701043 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.7), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 0.84 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 974 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701040 0.35 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 14 11 11 Above Moderate No 0.10 1959 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 966 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701039 0.24 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 9 7 7 Above Moderate No 1.06 1956 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerGM 952 COMMERCIAL ST 94303 14701038 0.30 LI GM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 12 9 9 Above Moderate No 1.36 1957 AE10.5 High Resource Keith Reckdahl, Arthur KellerROLM 1035 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710056 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.54 2014 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1051 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710082 1.07 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 42 34 34 Lower No 0.42 2014 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1053 E MEADOW CL 94303 12710081 1.60 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 64 51 51 Lower No 0.42 1970 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1085 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710110 1.43 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 57 45 45 Lower No 0.28 1975 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 3600 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12710076 2.08 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 83 66 66 Lower No 1.12 1990 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 3500 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736031 1.40 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 56 44 44 Lower No 0.84 1980 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 3460 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736029 1.49 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 59 47 47 Lower No 1.00 1970 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 3350 W Bayshore Rd 94303 12736040 3.96 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking, vacant 40 32 0 158 126 126 Lower No 0.67 1983 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1020 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710103 2.50 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 99 79 79 Lower No 0.40 1975 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1036 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710094 3.06 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 122 97 97 Lower No 0.58 1965 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1050 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710099 2.62 RO ROLM Two story office space (FAR: 0.4), surface parking 40 32 0 104 83 83 Lower No 0.44 1968 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1052 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710084 0.94 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 37 30 30 Lower No 0.48 1969 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1060 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710049 1.13 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 45 36 36 Lower No 0.77 1964 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1066 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710050 2.15 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 85 68 68 Lower No 0.89 1976 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1068 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710051 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.60 1974 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlROLM 1076 E Meadow Circle 94303 12710072 1.00 RO ROLM One story office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 40 32 32 Lower No 0.71 1961 AE10.5 High Resource Keith ReckdahlCaltrain Station 3241 PARK BL 94306 13226078 0.43 LI GM Gas station and convience store (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 17 13 13 Moderate No 0.03 1951 High Resource Yes

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 284

Category/Strategy Site Address or Street Zip Code APN Acres General Plan Zoning Current UseMinimum Density

Allowed (du/ac)

Maximum

Density

Allowed

(du/ac)

Realistic

Allowable

Density

(du/ac)

Existing UnitsMaximum

Capacity

Realistic

Capacity

Potential

Minus

Existing

Income

CategoryPublicly Owned

Included in 5th

Cycle HEILR Year Built

Floodzon

e

TCAC

Opportunity

Area

WG Member

Who

Recommended

Site

Retail

Preservat

ion

Within

150'

Buffer

Historic

Resource

Status

Notes

MFA 3877 EL CAMINO REAL 94303 13241091 0.75 MF;CS RM‐30; CS Vacant 31 40 32 0 30 24 24 Lower No 0.36 1920 X High Resource Keith ReckdahlMFA 190 CHANNING AV 94301 12028051 0.17 SOFA II CAP RT‐35 Auto garage 50 40 0 8 6 6 Moderate No 0.02 1900 X High Resource

MFA 444 GRANT AV 94306 12433035 0.19 MF RM‐40Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 7 5 4ove Moderate No 0.31 1957 X High Resource

MFA 573 LYTTON AV 94301 12010034 0.21 MF RM‐40Residential (1) 31 40 32 1 8 6 5ove Moderate No 0.18 1960 X High Resource

MFA 486 HAMILTON AV 94301 12016008 0.12 CC CD‐C (P)

One story retail and restaurant (FAR: 0.4) 40 32 0 4 3 3ove Moderate No 1.00 1956 X High Resource

Upzone 87 ENCINA AV 94301 12033001 0.57 CS CS

Two story medical office space Palo Alto Medical Foundation Cardiac Care Center (FAR: 0.8), surface parking 40 32 0 22 18 18 Lower

NO – Privately Ow

No 1.27 1947 X High Resource

Upzone 788 SAN ANTONIO AV 94303 14703041 0.58 CS CS

One story substandard office space (FAR: 0.5), surface parking 40 32 0 23 18 18 Lower

NO – Privately Ow

No 0.82 1953 X High Resource Yes

Upzone 702 CLARA DR 94303 12735023 0.29 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate

NO – Privately OwNo 0.30 1954 X High Resource

Upzone 3400 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13708006 0.23 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate


Upzone 649 FOREST AV 94301 12004019 0.29 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 8 7 6 Moderate

NO – Privately OwNo 0.13 1918 AH43.5 High Resource

Upzone 427 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009036 0.20 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 4 3 Moderate


Upzone 453 HAWTHORNE AV 94301 12009034 0.21 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate


Upzone 125 SEALE AV 94301 12418044 0.21 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 6 5 4 Moderate


Upzone 744 COWPER ST 94301 12016049 0.20 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5 Moderate


Upzone 245 EL CARMELO AV 94306 13219063 0.24 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate


Upzone 463 LYTTON AV 94301 12014062 0.23 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate


Upzone 227 RAMONA ST 94301 12025014 0.16 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4 Moderate


Upzone 827 UNIVERSITY AV 94301 00303018 0.37 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 14 11 10 Moderate


Upzone 447 LELAND AV 94306 12430018 0.23 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 9 7 6 Moderate


Upzone 103 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417077 0.25 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 6 5ove Moder


Upzone 111 TENNYSON AV 94301 12417076 0.25 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 7 6 5ove Moder


Upzone 652 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004010 0.31 MF RM‐20Residential (1) 8 30 24 1 9 7 6ove Moder


Upzone 740 WEBSTER ST 94301 12004071 0.15 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3ove Moder




Upzone 122 COLORADO AV 94301 13225049 0.15 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3ove Moder




Upzone 305 COLLEGE AV 94306 12428015 0.20 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5ove Moder


Upzone 718A WEBSTER ST 94301 12004068 0.15 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 5 4 3ove Moder


Upzone 383 COLLEGE AV 94306 12432030 0.20 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 8 6 5ove Moder


Upzone 634 HAMILTON AV 94301 12004009 0.29 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 11 9 8ove Moder


Upzone 746 BRYANT ST 94301 12027056 0.16 SOFA I CAP RM‐30Residential (1) 16 40 32 1 6 5 4ove Moder


Caltrain Station 360 FOREST AV 94301 120160700.23

MF RM‐40Residential (2) 31 40 32 2 9 7 5 Moderate No 1.04 0 High Resource

Caltrain Station 2951 EL CAMINO REAL 94306 13237052

0.33

CS CS

One story office space (FAR: 0.3), surface parking 40 32 0 13 10 10 Moderate No 0.63 0 High Resource Yes Yes

Caltrain Station 318 EMERSON ST 94301 12025093 0.13 MF RM‐30Residential (1) 16 50 40 1 6 5 4 Moderate No 0.97 1900 High Resource

Caltrain Station 2861 ALMA ST 94306 132260230.19

MF RM‐20Residential (2) 8 40 32 2 7 5 3ove Moderate No 0.78 1956 High ResourceTwo story office space (FAR: 0.5),

Administratively Removed Sites

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT A 14.a

Packet Pg. 285

Schedule of Meetings

Published March 10, 2022 This is a courtesy notice only. Meeting dates, times, and locations are subject to change. Almost all Palo Alto Council and some Standing Committee meetings are cablecast live on Channel 26. If there happens to be concurrent meetings, one meeting will be broadcast on Channel 29.

Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in using City facilities or programs, or who would like information on the City’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, may contact: ADA Coordinator, City of Palo Alto, 650-329-2550 (voice) or 329-1199 (TDD), [email protected]. Listening assistive devices are available in the Council Chambers. Sign language interpreters will be provided upon request with 72 hours advance notice. Please advise the City Clerk's Office (650-329-2571) of meetings or changes by 3:00 p.m. on Wednesdays for inclusion in the following week’s schedule.

3/10/2022

Meetings are held in-person and by virtual teleconference.

THURSDAY, MARCH 10 Human Relations Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. FRIDAY, MARCH 11 Sp. City Council Meeting – Architectural Review Board Interviews, 4:00 p.m. MONDAY, MARCH 14 Sp. City Council Meeting, 5:00 p.m. TUESDAY, MARCH 15 Finance Committee Meeting, 7 p.m. (CANCELLED) THURSDAY, MARCH 17 Architectural Review Board Meeting, 8:30 a.m. City/School Liaison Committee Meeting, 8:30 a.m. Public Art Commission Meeting, 7:00 p.m. MONDAY, MARCH 21 Sp. City Council Meeting, 5:00 p.m. TUESDAY, MARCH 22 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, 7 p.m. THURSDAY, MARCH 24 Historic Resources Board Meeting, 8:30 a.m. MONDAY, MARCH 28 Sp. Finance Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30 Planning & Transportation Commission Meeting, 6:00 p.m. MONDAY, APRIL 4 Sp. City Council Meeting, 5:00 p.m. TUESDAY, APRIL 5 Sp. Finance Committee Meeting, 5:30 p.m. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6 Sp. Utilities Advisory Commission, 6:00 p.m.

a

Packet Pg. 248


1 city council special meeting monday, march 21, 2022 5:00

Documents