disclaimer - seoul national...
TRANSCRIPT
저 시-비 리- 경 지 2.0 한민
는 아래 조건 르는 경 에 한하여 게
l 저 물 복제, 포, 전송, 전시, 공연 송할 수 습니다.
다 과 같 조건 라야 합니다:
l 하는, 저 물 나 포 경 , 저 물에 적 된 허락조건 명확하게 나타내어야 합니다.
l 저 터 허가를 면 러한 조건들 적 되지 않습니다.
저 에 른 리는 내 에 하여 향 지 않습니다.
것 허락규약(Legal Code) 해하 쉽게 약한 것 니다.
Disclaimer
저 시. 하는 원저 를 시하여야 합니다.
비 리. 하는 저 물 리 목적 할 수 없습니다.
경 지. 하는 저 물 개 , 형 또는 가공할 수 없습니다.
치의과학 석사학위논문
Human Dental Epithelial Cells Induce
Odontogenic Differentiation of SHED
사람 치아 상피세포에 의한
치수 줄기세포의 상아모세포 분화 유도
2019년 2월
서울대학교 대학원
치의과학과 분자유전학 전공
채 근 영
Abstract
Human Dental Epithelial Cells Induce
Odontogenic Differentiation of SHED
Geun Young Chae
Molecular Genetics Major
Graduate School, Seoul National University
(Directed by Prof. Gene Lee)
Tooth organogenesis and regeneration occur through reciprocal interaction
between epithelial and ectomesenchymal stem cells. This cell-to-cell
communication is also a key regulator in the differentiation of ameloblasts
and odontoblasts which secrete enamel and dentin, respectively. In studying
tooth regeneration, the dental pulp has been widely used as the source of
mesenchymal stem cells. On the contrary, most of the epithelium is lost after
tooth eruption and root completion, and thus have not been vastly explored.
Recently, prior research has characterized dental epithelial cells known as
Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath/epithelial rests of Malassez (HERS/ERM)
extracted from human periodontium and its cell line was established.
However, the epithelial-mesenchymal signaling capacity of HERS/ERM has
yet to be elucidated. Thus, this study was conducted to elucidate the effect of
HERS/ERM conditioned medium (CM) on the odontogenic differentiation of
stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). To simulate the
effect of epithelial paracrine actions on mesenchyme, SHED were cultured in
differentiation medium supplemented with varying proportions of CM
derived from the HERS/ERM cell line. The CM collected was freeze-dried
for further concentration of the solution, and the potency of CM was tested at
1X (differentiation medium supplemented with 10 v/v% CM), 4X and 8X
concentration factors, using freeze-dried CM for the 4X and 8X treatments.
To determine the effects of the varying concentration of CM, Alizarin red S
staining, RT-qPCR, Western blot, and DAPI nuclear staining were assessed
and the results were compared to SHED treated with the freeze-dried basal
media of CM. Alizarin red S staining revealed that increasing the
concentration of CM treatment had a distinctive impact on the amount of
calcium nodule formed in the differentiated SHED. Expression levels of
mineralization-related markers, RUNX2, BSP, DMP1, ON, OC, and MEPE
also confirmed the enhanced odontogenic effect of CM concentration on day
8 and 12 as CM concentration was increased. In contrast, the addition of
freeze-dried basal media exhibited a lack of calcium nodule formation and no
significant changes in the mineralization-related mRNA expression levels.
The expression of dentin phosphoprotein, an odontoblast marker observed by
Western blot, was also more prominent in CM-treated SHED than in basal
media-treated SHED on both day 16 and 20. Also, long-term culture of SHED
with CM exhibited cell death, whereas the basal media control group did not.
The DAPI nuclear staining revealed a phenomenon similar to the terminal
differentiation of cells. The data indicate that CM from human HERS/ERM
cell line has odontogenic differentiation capabilities that are concentration-
dependent, and further investigations may contribute to the discovery of
specific growth factors and cytokines at play. This study is the first report of
odontogenic induction potential of concentrated CM derived from the human
dental epithelial cell line.
………………………………………
Keywords : Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath/epithelial rests of Malassez
(HERS/ERM), stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED),
epithelial-mesenchymal interaction, conditioned medium, tooth
development and regeneration, odontogenic differentiation
Student Number : 2017-24083
4
Tables of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................. 5
Literature Review ..................................................................................... 7
Materials and Methods ............................................................................. 14
Results ...................................................................................................... 20
Figures and Table ..................................................................................... 23
Discussion ................................................................................................ 33
References ................................................................................................ 38
Abstracts (Korean) .................................................................................... 50
5
Introduction
Tooth development is dependent on both morphogenesis and
differentiation of related cells highly regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal
interaction [1]. Tooth organogenesis is normally divided into bud, cap, and
bell stages, depending on the changes in epithelial-mesenchymal morphology,
position and function mediated by signaling centers such as the placode
during the bud stage and enamel knots during the last two stages [2]. Some
important signaling molecules include BMPs, FGFs, SHHs, WNTs, as well
as TGF-β and TNF proteins [2, 3]. Single molecules have been tested to
demonstrate their role in odontogenesis by investigating the defects resulting
from their absence [4-6]. However, further examinations are needed as the
molecules are never found alone at work in a developmental setting [7].
The underlying mechanism of odontogenesis is commonly investigated
through co-cultures of two or more cell types in vitro [8, 9], while recent
advances have shifted their focus towards inducing odontogenic responses
with conditioned medium (CM) [10]. Most references highlight the role of
CM derived from animal cell sources, such as mouse and rat [11-13], which
are the most commonly used model organisms for human odontogenesis.
Much research has gained insight into their cell properties and mechanisms;
however, rodents retain stem cells that continuously renew their teeth [14],
whereas humans have two sets of dentition, one of which is permanent [15].
CM from human cell cultures lacks both the foundation and affirmative data
6
for odontogenesis. Also, there is a need to evaluate a range of CM
concentrations to find the optimal level for odontogenic differentiation. This
study is the first report of odontogenic induction potential of concentrated
CM derived from the human dental epithelial cell line.
In this study, I examined the effect of CM from a stable epithelial cell line
established from Hertwig’s Epithelial Root Sheath/Epithelial Rests of
Malassez (HERS/ERM), which originate from human molars [16, 17], on
stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). Also, different
concentrations of CM were tested for comparison. The effects of human cell-
derived CM were analyzed by CCK-8 assay, Alizarin red S and DAPI staining,
real-time qPCR, and Western blotting. The results showed that CM increased
the number of mineralized nodules in differentiated SHED culture, and thus
enhanced the odontogenic potential of SHED in vitro in a concentration-
dependent manner.
7
Literature Review
I. Odontogenesis and related signaling factors
Odontogenesis, the mechanism of tooth development in organisms,
entails an organized series of queues that outlines different stages of tooth
morphogenesis. Tooth formation results from epithelial and mesenchymal
stem cells interacting with one another through extracellular signaling
molecules of transforming necrosis factors (TNFs), bone morphogenetic
proteins (BMPs), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), wingless/integrated
(WNTs), and sonic hedgehog (SHH) families to generate an inductive
environment [3]. The signaling pathway and regulatory molecules involved
are known to be conserved in embryonic development, and the specific
epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are well identified for each step of tooth
organogenesis [18]. These communications are mediated by several signaling
centers during tooth development. For instance, the placode, formed by the
thickening of ectoderm, signals the underlying neural-crest mesenchyme to
condense around the epithelial bud [2], and the primary and secondary enamel
knots regulate morphogenesis of the crown during bud and cap stage [19].
Tooth crown is finalized in bell stage when the epithelial and mesenchymal
cells differentiate into ameloblasts and odontoblasts at the interface and
deposit hard tissues, enamel and dentin matrices, respectively [2].
8
i. Conditioned medium in vitro and in vivo
Odontogenesis has been explored in vitro and in vivo through co-cultures
of epithelium and mesenchymal cells [8], in vivo therapy [6], induction by
conditioned medium (CM) [11, 13, 20], and so on. However, considering the
difficulty in obtaining and maintaining stem cells from human sources as well
as transplant rejection or engraftment issues and risk of developing cancer in
clinic applications, CM seems to be the most viable option.
CM has been studied in cell cultures with diverse cells or media types and
culture or disease conditions for a wide range of applications [10]. Few
disease conditions include injuries in liver [21, 22], lung [23, 24], spinal cord
[25] and brain [26, 27], in which CM improved the circumstances. CM
composition also varied between cell monolayer and spheroids [28]; it has
been reported that spheroid conditions produced higher concentrations of
growth factors and cytokines in CM than monolayer conditions [29]. Hypoxic
conditions also enriched paracrine factors in CM, subsequently enhancing its
effect on proliferation and tubular formation of cells [30]. Other variations in
culture duration, basal medium and supplements also affected CM
configuration [10]. Due to such a vast range of possibilities and deviations, it
is open to accommodate a large variety of in vitro and in vivo experiments in
numerous fields of study.
In vitro studies have used the paracrine factors within CM to promote
growth [31], repair [30] or differentiation [8, 32] of cells. Cellular factors,
such as cytokines and signaling molecules, have been investigated to enhance
9
cell performance [5, 33]. Previous studies have determined single factors that
influenced cell fate in vitro [34, 35], but their mode of action when combined
is uncertain. Thus, others have analyzed the composition of CM to help
narrow down the combination of elements at work [25, 36-38]. Tooth
formation is also governed by a network of growth and transcription factors
that shift the odontogenic potential back and forth between epithelium and
mesenchyme at E12.5 [3]. Likewise, tooth germ cell-derived CM, which is
thought to contain regulators from both epithelium and the surrounding
mesenchyme, was used to differentiate adult stem cells into odontoblast-like
cells in vitro [13]. In other words, CM is able to reproduce the temporospatial
effect of an odontogenic microenvironment of in vivo state required for
cellular transformation [13, 39]. However, the regulation of these molecules
are complex and the specific roles for each are difficult to assign because most
have multiple roles, some are redundant, and together they have synergistic
effects [7].
CM also received attention as a novel therapeutic method to overcome the
limitations of stem cell therapy [36]. This cell-free system has been
functionally verified in in vivo angiogenesis [36, 40], liver regeneration [22],
and odontogenesis [12] to name a few. Another study inserted preameloblast-
derived CM in a hollow root canal space in mice with human pulp cells, which
successfully restored pulp tissue [11]. Moreover, a study comparing porcine
and human tooth germ cell-derived CM showed that both had similar effects
on the odontogenic induction of human dental pulp stem cells in vitro and in
10
vivo as indicated by morphological and genetic changes [20], raising hopes
for practical application of xenogeneic CM. Additionally, CM from cell lines
have been used as a tool for discovery of new biomarkers for diseases, and
analyses of various types of CM revealed cell-specific secretome, including
signal peptides, growth factors, enzymes and other soluble factors [41], which
may help identify specific factors for enhancement of clinical effect. Also,
unlike osteogenesis and mineralization, odontogenic-specific markers are not
well known, and thus CM may provide a list of potential biomarkers explicit
in odontogenesis.
ii. Conditioned medium contains extracellular vesicles
Like the odontogenic environment of tooth formation in vivo, the key
premise of CM is that it provides a microenvironment that is similar to the
actual odontogenic conditions, allowing cells within it to be reprogrammed.
For instance, tooth germ cell-derived CM contains biological factors such as
TGF-β and BMP molecules [7, 20] that play a role in cytodifferentiation and
directing cell fate [42, 43]. CM is also known to contain exosomes, a type of
extracellular vesicles gaining attention in recent years. Although the
mechanism of cellular communication in tooth development remains obscure,
molecules of sizes larger than 100 nm seem to be involved in the polarization
or differentiation of cells [44]. Exosomes, also within this boundary, were
able to induce amelogenesis or dentinogenesis depending on whether
mesenchymal exosomes were used on epithelium or vice versa. [45].
11
Exosomes in osteogenic conditions also increased mineralization nodules
and corresponding matrix proteins, and the effect was reported to be dose-
dependent [45-47]. Moreover, exosome treatment amplified DPP and DMP1
expression at the junction of dentin and soft tissue of exosome-treated
samples, indicating augmented matrix mineralization [46]. Similarly, co-
culture of two cell types with a permeable barrier in between allowed
transmission of cytokines, resulting in mineralized nodules [48]. Moreover,
Shapiro et al. (2015) claims that exosomes are related to matrix vesicles [49],
the initiating point of mineralization in bone and other mineralizing tissues
[50-53], despite the fact that the former is a non-adherent extracellular vesicle,
while the latter is always found attached to the extracellular matrix
components [49, 54]. They argued that the size of matrix vesicles, from 0.02
to 2.0 μm [55], were within range of the diameter of exosomes varying from
0.04 to 1.0 μm [56], and the structure and formation of matrix vesicles
appeared similar to the budding of exosomes [57, 58]. If matrix vesicles are
indeed a type of exosomes, the study of CM may contribute greatly to
unveiling the mechanisms behind osteo- and odontogenic mineralization.
iii. Limitations of conditioned medium
Unfortunately, CM also needs to overcome a couple of limitations for
clinic use. First, the media used for CM collection contains elements that are
not suitable for humans such as HEPES; and secondly, the concentration of
secretome from cell culture is too low to have a significant effect on humans
12
[29]. Also, the specific content of CM must be reviewed for each type or batch
and method of CM collection standardized before clinical use in the future for
consistency and safety issues. Nonetheless, clinic efforts have been made
recently to treat multiple sclerosis [59], hair loss [60], and aging of skin [61],
all of which presented a positive outlook on the potential uses of CM. Further
research is needed to test more cases, but overall CM appears to be a durable
solution in the long term.
II. Mineralization, apoptosis and terminal differentiation
In organisms, apoptosis is known to play a significant role in embryonic
development as well as in tooth organogenesis [62, 63]. The shaping of the
tooth, silencing of signaling centers, and reduction of cell numbers are
primary examples of dental apoptosis [63]. For instance, as the dentin matrix
begins to occupy more space after secondary dentin deposition, the number
of odontoblasts are reduced by half through apoptosis [64]. Thus, a defect in
apoptosis may affect the overall dental development, influencing the number
or the size of teeth [65, 66].
A recent study reported the effect of calcium and mineralization of dental
pulp cells on apoptosis [67]. Although the reasons for cell death is unclear,
the higher calcium ion concentration of 5.4 and 9.0 mM increased apoptotic
and necrotic markers [67]. Moreover, proinflammatory cytokines also induce
odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells [68, 69]. This may be
closely related to apoptotic bodies’ potential role as nucleation sites for
13
calcification as it is with matrix vesicles [70-72]. Terminal differentiation of
growth plate chondrocytes is also associated with apoptosis [73, 74], and a
factor regulating differentiation and apoptosis, activating transcription factor
2 (ATF-2), was statistically more expressed in terminally differentiated
odontoblasts than in pulpal fibroblasts [75]. Still, not much is known about
the correlation between mineralization, cell death and terminal differentiation
in odontogenesis, and thus requires further investigation to make a statement.
14
Materials and Methods
Primary cell culture
To culture SHED, human deciduous teeth were obtained in Hank’s
balanced salt solution (HBSS; Welgene, Daegu, Korea) supplemented with
3% antibiotics-antimycotics (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from patients who
gave informed consent. Dental pulp tissues were extracted with fine forceps
and digested in 1 mg/ml of Collagenase Type I (Gibco) and 2.4 mg/ ml of
Dispase (Gibco) at 37°C. After one hour of incubation, the
Collagenase/Dispase enzyme solution was inactivated by Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Welgene) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% antibiotics-
antimycotics (Gibco). Single cell suspensions were seeded and maintained in
minimum essential medium alpha (αMEM; Hyclone) supplemented with 10%
FBS and 1% antibiotics-antimycotics. The medium was changed every two
days. Cells were sub-cultured at 70% confluence.
HERS/ERM cells were isolated and cultured as described by Nam et al.
[1]. Briefly, human third molars were obtained in HBSS (Welgene)
supplemented with 3% antibiotics-antimycotics as explained above.
Periodontal ligament tissues, gently separated from the surface of the root,
were incubated in Collagenase/Dispase enzyme solution at 37°C. After one
hour of incubation, the enzyme was inactivated by DMEM supplemented
with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotics-antimycotics. Single cell suspensions were
15
seeded and maintained in αMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1%
antibiotics-antimycotics. The medium was changed every two days. When
colonies were observed, the mesenchymal cells were isolated by
trypsinization with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) and the remaining cells in
the culture plates were washed once with Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered
Saline (DPBS; Welgene) and maintained in serum-free keratinocyte growth
medium-2 (KGM-2; Lonza Rockland, Rockland, ME, USA). Cells were sub-
cultured at 70% confluence.
Preparation and application of CM
To prepare human epithelial CM, HERS-SV40/hTERT cell line was
counted and cultured in vitro for 24 hours in serum-free growth medium,
KGM-2. After washing with DPBS, the cells were cultured in fresh KGM-2
for 48 hours. The conditioned medium was collected, centrifuged at 2000 x g
for 10 minutes at 4°C, then filtered by 0.22 μm filter membrane (Millipore,
Billerica, MA, USA) to eliminate cell debris before aliquoting and freezing
at -80°C. Frozen CM was lyophilized using a freeze-dryer (IlShin BioBase,
Dongducheon, South Korea) at -80°C and 5 mTorr for a week (Figure 1A).
The lyophilized powder was dissolved in a known volume of distilled water
to concentrate the CM by a factor of 16.
In cell culture, the culture media was switched to either non-induction
control media (αMEM supplemented with 5% FBS) or induction media
(αMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-
16
glycerophosphate, and 0.1 μM dexamethasone) supplemented with or without
HERS/ERM CM or freeze-dried CM (Figure 1B) when SHED reached
confluence. HERS/ERM CM was added to constitute 10% of the medium,
while HERS/ERM freeze-dried CM was supplemented at 4X and 8X
concentrations, which are equivalent to 40% and 80% constitution,
respectively.
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) cytotoxicity assay
Cells were counted and dispensed (5000 cells/100 μl/well) in a 96-well
plate. The plate was incubated for 24 hours in a humidified incubator (5%
CO2, 37°C), and CCK-8 solution was added to each well of the plate. After
two hours of incubation, the absorbance of the wells was measured at 450 nm
using a microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany). Media
was changed every day, and the absorbance was measured at the same time
each day for six days.
Alizarin red S staining
Primary SHED was cultured to confluence and cultured for 8, 12, 16, and
20 days in differentiation induction media, αMEM supplemented with 5%
FBS, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 0.1 μM
dexamethasone with varying CM and freeze-dried CM concentrations. The
medium was changed every other day. To visualize the accumulation of
mineralized nodules, the differentiated SHED were stained with 2% Alizarin
17
red S solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were washed
with DPBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (T&I Biotechnology, Seoul,
Korea) at room temperature. After washing with DPBS, the cells were stained
with 2% Alizarin red S solution (Sigma-Aldrich). The remaining Alizarin
solution was washed with distilled water.
DAPI staining
Primary SHED was cultured to confluence in 12-well plates (SPL,
Pocheon, Korea) and cultured for 10, 12, 14, 16, or 18 days in differentiation
induction media. On the day of DAPI staining, cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde at room temperature. After washing with DPBS, DAPI
(Sigma) diluted (1:1000) in DPBS was added in the dark and incubated at
room temperature for 10 minutes. The remaining DAPI was washed with
DPBS and pictures were taken using an inverted microscope (Nikon, Melville,
NY, USA). All immunofluorescence staining were conducted more than three
times.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Cell pellets in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) were washed with
DPBS supplemented with 2% FBS. Total RNA isolation was performed using
the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). An additional DNase I
treatment from the RNase-free DNase set (Qiagen) was done for removal of
genomic DNA contamination. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed
18
using the amfiRivert cDNA synthesis Platinum Master Mix (GenDEPOT,
Barker, TX, USA). The following RT conditions were used: annealing at 25°C
for 5 min, followed by extension at 42°C for 60 min, and heat inactivation of
the enzyme at 70°C for 15 min. The RT products were stored at -20°C until
quantitative analysis.
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
The cDNA reverse transcribed from SHED were amplified using
Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and specific primers
for human BSP, Runx2, ON, OC, DMP1, MEPE, and GAPDH listed in Table
1. Real-time PCR was performed by CFX CONect Real-Time PCR Detection
System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The cycle threshold (CT) values of
each gene were standardized to those of the housekeeping gene,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The following PCR
conditions were used: initializing at 95°C for 30 sec, denaturing at 95°C for
10 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, followed by elongation at 72°C for 33
sec, and heat inactivation of the enzyme at 70°C for 15 min.
Western blot analysis
Primary SHED was differentiated for 16 and 20 days with CM and freeze-
dried CM supplements, then collected in 1.5 ml tubes and pelleted by
centrifugation at 13,200 rpm, 4°C, for 3 minutes. Pellets were re-suspended
in RIPA lysis buffer (RKMB-030-0050, Rockland Immunochemicals,
19
Limerick, PA, USA) supplemented with Halt Protease and Phosphatase
Inhibitor Cocktail (78440, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, 1:100)
and incubated on ice. Proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl
sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and transferred to
immunoblot PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked with 5%
non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad) in TBS-T [20 mM Tris base, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1%
Tween 20 (pH 7.6)], and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody
diluted in TBS-T buffer (1:1000). Monoclonal antibody against DSPP (sc-
73632, Santa Cruz), binding to the DPP domain CSRGDASYNSDESKDNG
[76], was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, CA, USA). After washing with TBS-T buffer, membranes
were incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase (BR170-6516, Bio-Rad). Labeled protein bands were
detected using a bio-image analyzer (Bio-Rad).
Statistical analysis
The data were presented as means ± standard deviations of three replicates
for each treatment. Data analysis was performed using analysis of variance
(ANOVA) and post hoc LSD t-test and Duncan for pair-wise comparisons.
The differences were considered to be significant when p < 0.05. All statistical
analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4).
20
Results
The viability of SHED in HERS/ERM freeze-dried CM treatment
A toxicological test was performed for a week to examine the effects of
HERS/ERM freeze-dried CM on the viability of SHED at different
concentrations in vitro. The CCK-8 assay indicated that cell count was not
greatly altered from the control up to 8X concentration, but the absorbance
measured dramatically dropped at 16X and 32X concentrations after just one
day of incubation. At 8X concentration, the absorbance measurement was
visibly lower than the control, but cells still had no difficulty reaching
confluence by the end of the week. The 1X, 2X and 4X freeze-dried CM
treatments seemed to follow the same trend as the control (Figure 2).
HERS/ERM CM induces odontogenic differentiation of SHED in vitro
After 8 and 12 days of CM treatment, differentiated SHED was analyzed
by RT-qPCR to determine whether CM enhanced odontogenesis and
mineralization (Figure 3). The mineralization-related BSP expression was
significantly increased in freeze-dried CM treatments on both day 8 and 12,
while DMP1 was significantly enhanced in 4X CM treatment on both days
compared to the controls and in 8X CM treatment on day 12. MEPE
expression was also significantly increased in freeze-dried CM groups on day
8 and 12 when compared to the freeze-dried basal media controls. On the
other hand, early mineralization markers like RUNX2 showed a decreasing
21
trend in all treatment on day 12 compared to the non-induction control. Other
early markers, such as ON and OC, also showed a similar trend as RUNX2.
Treatment groups had relatively higher gene expression levels on day 8 but
declined on day 12. The relative ON expression in basal media control groups
was higher than CM treatment on both days, but the 4X control showed
significantly less OC expression on both days.
Alizarin red S staining was also performed to compare the calcification
nodule formation of CM-treated groups to the non-induction control. Staining
results exhibited no staining of nodules on day 8. The first signs of
mineralized nodule formation were observed on day 12 in CM-treated groups.
Odontogenic induction without CM exhibited mineralized nodules on day 16
and increased onwards, while CM-treated groups showed a notable increase
in nodule formation from day 12 to day 20 (Figure 4A). All induction groups
excluding basal media controls were stained thoroughly on day 20, but in
earlier days, the difference between the amounts of nodule formation was
prominent among these treatment groups. In contrast, the non-induction
group and basal media control groups were not stained for the duration of 20
days. At 200X magnification, SHED had larger Alizarin stained portions as
the concentration of CM treatment was increased (Figure 4B). The addition
of 1X CM also increased the number of nodule formation compared to the
induction group without CM, but not more than the freeze-dried CM
treatments. A similar pattern was also observed in unstained morphology of
differentiated SHED, where the freeze-dried CM-treated cells had
22
significantly more visible mineralized aggregates compared to the non-
induction and basal media controls. The aggregates also appeared to be more
densely formed in higher concentrations of CM compared to the 1X CM
group (Figure 6A).
Furthermore, Western blot was run to verify that mineralization in vitro
occurred as a result of odontogenic differentiation of SHED. The
immunoblots demonstrated that the relative amount of DPP proteins was
increased in freeze-dried CM treatment groups on day 16 compared to the
non-induction and induction controls. On day 20, the DPP expression
increased in all treatments compared to the non-induction control (Figure 5).
Terminal differentiation of SHED when treated with HERS/ERM freeze-
dried CM
To test the viability of SHED under the influence of freeze-dried CM over
a longer period, DAPI staining experiment was conducted on day 18. The
non-induction and induction controls showed consistent morphology of
SHED nuclei throughout 18 days. On the other hand, 4X and 8X CM-treated
nuclei began to alter and showed similar signs to DNA fragmentation on day
18. This data conforms to the expression of β-actin in western blotting, in
which 4X and 8X CM-treated cells exhibited less amount of β-actin, despite
loading the equal quantity of proteins for all treatments. By day 16 and 20,
both freeze-dried CM-treated groups had significantly less expression of β-
actin proteins compared to the controls (Figure 5).
23
Table 1. Sequences of primers used for RT-PCR
Class Gene Size
(bp)
Forward Sequence
(5’ 3’)
Reverse Sequence
(5’ → 3’)
Odontoblast
Markers
hBSP 100 AAG GCT ACG ATG GCT ATG ATG GT AAT GGT AGC CGG ATG CAA AG
hRUNX2 149 CCC AGT ATG AGA GTA GGT GTC C GGG TAA GAC TGG TCA TAG GAC C
hON 100 TAC ATC GGG CCT TGC AAA TAC GGG TGA CCA GGA CGT TCT TG
hOC 235 ATC CTT TGG GGT TTG GCC TAC GCC AAT AGG GCG AGG AGT G
hDMP1 265 ACA GGC AAA TGA AGA CCC TTC ACT GGC TTG TAT GG
hMEPE 116 CAA GAA GCC AGG TAT TCT GAA GG TGT GGT TGA AAT GTT GGT GCT
GAPDH 153 CAT CAC TGC CAC CCA GAA GAC TG ATG CCA GTG AGC TTC CCG TTC AG
24
A
B
Figure 1. Procedure outline for establishing the HERS/ERM freeze-dried conditioned medium (CM) used in the following experiments.
(A) The HERS/ERM cell line was seeded 60 x 104 cells per 90 mm dish in serum-free growth medium and the CM was collected after
48 hours of incubation. The CM was centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 minutes, filtered with a 0.22-μm membrane filter, and frozen at
-80°C before lyophilization. By adding a known volume of distilled water to the freeze-dried CM powder, the CM was concentrated
by a factor of 16. (B) The SHED was cultured in induction medium supplemented (c) with or (b) without CM, or (e) with freeze-dried
CM obtained from the HERS/ERM cells, and compared to the SHED cultured in (a) non-induction medium, or in (d) induction
medium supplemented with freeze-dried basal medium (BM).
25
Figure 2. Toxicological test of freeze-dried conditioned medium (CM) on the SHED in vitro. The SHED was treated with growth
medium supplemented with the HERS/ERM CM at six different concentrations, 1X, 2X, 4X, 8X, 16X, and 32X, and compared to the
control; the value of 1X represents the addition of 10% (v/v) CM. The SHED was seeded at Day 0, and the first absorbance was
measured at Day 1, the day on which the CM were added. Cell viability was assessed every 24 hours for a week by CCK-8 assay. The
concentration of 16X and 32X led to immediate cell death, while all other treatment groups eventually reached cell confluence by the
last day. The 8X group exhibited a slower growth rate compared to lower concentration groups, but reached confluence by the end of
the week. Data are mean ± SD of three replicates.
26
Figure 3. Relative gene expression of differentiated SHED in vitro. The SHED was treated with induction medium supplemented with
different concentrations of HERS/ERM conditioned medium (CM) for 8 and 12 days, where the value of 1X represents the addition
of CM at 10% (v/v) of the total volume. The relative mRNA expression levels of BSP, DMP1, MEPE, RUNX2, ON and OC were
27
measured by quantitative RT-PCR analysis and the data were normalized by GAPDH levels. The HERS/ERM freeze-dried CM-treated
groups showed a significant increase in BSP, DMP1, and MEPE expression compared to the controls, while early mineralization
markers, RUNX2, ON and OC, showed significant decreases on day 12. Data are mean ± SD of three replicates. Bars labeled with
different letters or numbers are significantly different from the non-induction control (1,2,3p < 0.05 and a,b,cp < 0.05). BSP: bone
sialoprotein; DMP1: dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1; MEPE: matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein; RUNX2: Runt-related
transcription factor 2; ON: osteonectin; OC: osteocalcin.
28
A
Figure 4. Mineralized nodule formation of differentiated SHED in vitro. The SHED was cultured in induction medium supplemented
with different concentrations of HERS/ERM conditioned medium (CM), where the value of 1X represents the addition of 10% (v/v)
CM. The label indicates the presence of induction and/or CM. The calcium nodule formation was observed through (A) Alizarin red
S stained cells after 8, 12, 16 and 20 days of culture. Differentiated SHED produced more mineralized nodules when supplemented
with CM, and mineralization density increased as CM concentration was increased. All experiments were conducted in three replicates.
29
B
Figure 4. (B) Alizarin red S stained cells after 12, 16 and 20 days of culture, photographed at 200X magnification. Mineralized nodules
were observed 12 days after the start of odontogenic induction, and accumulated until all differentiated groups reached mineralization
equilibrium after 20 days. None of the controls were Alizarin red S stained. All experiments were conducted in three replicates.
30
Figure 5. Western blot analysis of differentiated SHED in vitro. The SHED was cultured in induction medium supplemented with
different concentrations of HERS/ERM conditioned medium (CM) for 16 and 20 days, where the value of 1X represents the addition
of CM at 10% (v/v) of the total volume. The label indicates the presence of induction and/or CM. The expression levels of DPP and
β-actin proteins were analyzed by western blotting. DPP was more strongly expressed in CM-treated groups compared to the non-
induction and induction controls. The disappearance of DSPP bands (solid arrows) corresponded with the appearance and the thickness
of DPP bands (dotted arrows). The β-actin protein bands were thinner in freeze-dried CM-treated groups compared to the basal media
control bands. Lane 1: non-induced SHED; lane 2: odontogenic induced SHED; lane 3: odontogenic induced SHED treated with 4X
freeze-dried basal media (BM); lane 4: odontogenic induced SHED treated with 8X freeze-dried BM; lane 5: odontogenic induced
SHED treated with 4X freeze-dried CM; lane 6: odontogenic induced SHED treated with 8X freeze-dried CM.
31
A
Figure 6. Cell morphology of differentiated SHED in vitro. The SHED was cultured in differentiation medium supplemented with
different concentrations of HERS/ERM conditioned medium (CM), where the value of 1X represents the addition of CM at 10% (v/v)
of the total volume. The label indicates the presence of induction and/or CM. (A) Cell morphology was observed 20 days after
odontogenic induction. Cells treated with freeze-dried CM was highly mineralized after 20 days of odontogenic induction, compared
to the basal media controls which showed no mineral nodule formation.
32
B
Figure 6. (B) Cell nuclei were stained by DAPI after 18 days of induction and photographed at 600X magnification to observe nuclear
alterations. Microscopic images showed signs of DNA fragmentation in freeze-dried CM-treated cells, while the non-induction and
induction control groups maintained smooth, oval-shaped nuclei. The pictures are representative of three independent experiments.
33
Discussion
Tooth development is a complex, regulated series of reciprocal
communication between the epithelium and mesenchyme, which eventually
differentiate into ameloblasts and odontoblasts, respectively, to form hard-
tissue [2]. To reproduce cellular interaction, stem cells have been used for in
vitro co-culture systems [8] or bioengineering for tooth regeneration [77].
However, the invasiveness of stem cells has made the transition to bedside
difficult, as well as other issues including the expenses and maintenance of
cell culture. CM, on the contrary, are proven to have regenerative effects and
are easily obtained from cell cultures.
CM has been established from various cell types and culture conditions,
and have been utilized in the induction of cell differentiation in vitro [8, 78]
and in vivo [11, 79, 80]. It is said to contain soluble factors [81-83] that create
an odontogenic microenvironment favorable for cell differentiation [13].
However, the effect of cytokines and other paracrine factors on the regulation
of cell function is complex, and thus, the results are not always dose-
dependent. For instance, one study found that the concentration of CM
supplements did not correlate with cell proliferation [84]. Others found that
varying concentrations of CM had no effect on the cell behavior [40, 85].
Interestingly, the CM in our study had concentration-dependent
enhancing effects on the odontogenic capacity of SHED. This could be due
to our method of concentrating the CM by lyophilization. After collecting and
34
freezing the CM from HERS/ERM cell line, the frozen CM was freeze-dried,
and the resultant powder was dissolved in a known volume of distilled water
to concentrate the CM by a factor of 16. The rationale behind this was to
increase the concentration of CM supplement in differentiation medium
without constituting a larger proportion of the total volume. Thus, I was able
to add 40% and 80% of CM (v/v) to the differentiation medium by adding
only 25 and 50 μl of CM, respectively, per milliliter of odontogenic induction
medium.
In vitro differentiation of SHED with the supplementation of freeze-dried
CM was examined by mineralization-related gene expression levels, namely
BSP, DMP1, MEPE, RUNX2, ON, OC, and as well as the expression of DPP
proteins. Previous studies state that BSP is expressed in mature osteoblasts
[86, 87], and its appearance correlates to calcified nodule formation [88]. On
both day 8 and 12, BSP was significantly increased in higher concentrations
of CM (Figure 3), and Alizarin red S staining exhibited increased formation
of mineralized nodules in differentiated SHED with 4X and 8X freeze-dried
CM supplements on day 12 (Figure 4B). Similar to BSP, DMP1 is also
associated with the start of mineralization [89]. As expected, the mRNA
expression of DMP1 was enhanced significantly in 4X freeze-dried CM
treatment; but data was not significant in 8X freeze-dried CM treatment
(Figure 3A). This may be due to inconsistent effects of 8X freeze-dried CM
on SHED differentiation, as observed by the slight variations between
replicates in Alizarin red S staining on day 12 and 20 (Figure 4A). Also,
35
MEPE is reported to be present in mineralizing tissues as its cleaved form,
acidic-serine-aspartate-rich-MEPE-associated motif [90, 91]. Unlike BSP,
DMP1, and MEPE, the expression of RUNX2, ON, and OC was significantly
downregulated in CM treatments on day 12, which is consistent with the
claim that RUNX2 expression declines in more mature odontoblasts [92],
while ON and OC are inversely correlated with calcium deposition [93, 94].
Lastly, DPP proteins that are closely related to odontogenesis and
mineralization in vitro [95] exhibited thicker bands in differentiated SHED
compared to the non-induction control on immunoblot, and bands at higher
sizes around 131 kDa seemed to disappear in correspondence to the
appearance and the thickness of lower DPP bands at 97 kDa [96]. Because
the monoclonal DSPP (LFMb-21) antibody binds to the DPP domain
CSRGDASYNSDESKDNG, both cleaved DPP and the remaining uncleaved
DSPP form should be detected on Western blot. However, there is still no
accepted explanation for the multiple bands detected by DSPP (LFMb-21)
antibody. Additionally, DPP bands were expressed highly in all differentiated
SHED on day 20 (Figure 5). This result was also consistent with Alizarin red
staining, which displayed significant levels of calcification nodules on day 20
(Figure 4A).
To confirm that the increased odontogenic effect on SHED was due to the
conditioning of medium by epithelial cells for 48 hours, the unconditioned
basal medium was added to the induction medium as a control variable. The
basal medium was freeze-dried and used at 4X and 8X concentrations to
36
compare directly with the freeze-dried CM treatments. As a result, the lack of
significant differences in relative gene levels, mineralized nodule deposits,
and Western blot in the basal media controls verified that the enhancement of
odontogenic capacity was due to the HERS/ERM cell line conditioning of the
basal medium, and not its original components.
However, it appeared that long-term treatment of freeze-dried CM
resulted in cell death, and the nuclei appeared to disintegrate, as determined
by DAPI staining (Figure 6B) and the decreasing β-actin expression in
Western blotting (Figure 5B). This could be due to the accumulation of freeze-
dried CM toxicity in long-term cell cultures, which was also observed at
higher concentrations of freeze-dried CM according to the CCK-8 assay. Cell
growth and viability were not greatly affected up to 8X concentration but
resulted in immediate cell death at 16X and 32X concentrations on the first
day of absorbance measurement (Figure 2). However, freeze-dried basal
media did not result in cell death on day 18, indicating that concentrated levels
of basal media components were not the cause of cellular toxicity. Thus, it
could also be explained by the nature of the cytodifferentiation stage in tooth
development. At terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, the cell cycle stops,
and the cells elongate, polarize and secrete a dentin matrix [5]. Smooth, oval
shapes of the nuclei were maintained until day 14 in 4X freeze-dried CM
treatment and day 16 in 8X freeze-dried CM treatment (data not shown).
Therefore, cell death naturally occurs as cells are terminally differentiated by
CM, and without further cell proliferation due to confluence, only the secreted
37
pre-dentin matrix remains as asserted by the strong expression of DPP
proteins even when beta-actin was reduced.
Our results suggest that the odontogenic differentiation effects of CM
derived from HERS/ERM cell line on SHED were concentration-dependent
up to 8X concentration factor in vitro. In-depth studies are needed to reveal
the specific composition of the CM and its involvement in the odontogenic
differentiation mechanism of mesenchymal cells.
38
References
1. Thesleff, I., et al., Epithelial-mesenchymal signaling during tooth
development. CONect Tissue Res, 1995. 32(1-4): p. 9-15.
2. Thesleff, I., Epithelial-mesenchymal signalling regulating tooth
morphogenesis. J Cell Sci, 2003. 116(Pt 9): p. 1647-8.
3. Zhang, Y.D., et al., Making a tooth: growth factors, transcription
factors, and stem cells. Cell Res, 2005. 15(5): p. 301-16.
4. Aberg, T., et al., Runx2 mediates FGF signaling from epithelium to
mesenchyme during tooth morphogenesis. Dev Biol, 2004. 270(1): p. 76-93.
5. Gritli-Linde, A., et al., Shh signaling within the dental epithelium is
necessary for cell proliferation, growth and polarization. Development, 2002.
129(23): p. 5323-5337.
6. Nakashima, M. and A. Akamine, The application of tissue
engineering to regeneration of pulp and dentin in endodontics. J Endod, 2005.
31(10): p. 711-8.
7. Smith, A.J. and H. Lesot, Induction and regulation of crown
dentinogenesis: embryonic events as a template for dental tissue repair? Crit
Rev Oral Biol Med, 2001. 12(5): p. 425-37.
8. Arakaki, M., et al., Role of epithelial-stem cell interactions during
dental cell differentiation. J Biol Chem, 2012. 287(13): p. 10590-601.
9. Yu, J., et al., Epithelial-mesenchymal cell ratios can determine the
crown morphogenesis of dental pulp stem cells. Stem Cells Dev, 2008. 17(3):
39
p. 475-82.
10. Pawitan, J.A., Prospect of Stem Cell Conditioned Medium in
Regenerative Medicine. Biomed Research International, 2014.
11. Choung, H.W., et al., The role of preameloblast-conditioned medium
in dental pulp regeneration. Journal of Molecular Histology, 2013. 44(6): p.
715-721.
12. Lee, J.H., et al., Odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp
stem cells induced by preameloblast-derived factors. Biomaterials, 2011.
32(36): p. 9696-706.
13. Yu, J.H., et al., Differentiation of dental pulp stem cells into regular-
shaped dentin-pulp complex induced by tooth germ cell conditioned medium.
Tissue Engineering, 2006. 12(11): p. 3097-3105.
14. Ohshima, H., et al., The eternal tooth germ is formed at the apical
end of continuously growing teeth. Archives of Oral Biology, 2005. 50(2): p.
153-157.
15. Klein, O.D., et al., Developmental disorders of the dentition: an
update. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet, 2013. 163C(4): p. 318-32.
16. Nam, H., et al., Expression profile of the stem cell markers in human
Hertwig's epithelial root sheath/Epithelial rests of Malassez cells. Mol Cells,
2011. 31(4): p. 355-60.
17. Nam, H., et al., Establishment of Hertwig's epithelial root
sheath/epithelial rests of Malassez cell line from human periodontium. Mol
Cells, 2014. 37(7): p. 562-7.
40
18. Jussila, M. and I. Thesleff, Signaling networks regulating tooth
organogenesis and regeneration, and the specification of dental mesenchymal
and epithelial cell lineages. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2012. 4(4): p.
a008425.
19. Jernvall, J. and I. Thesleff, Reiterative signaling and patterning
during mammalian tooth morphogenesis. Mech Dev, 2000. 92(1): p. 19-29.
20. Wang, Y.X., et al., Porcine tooth germ cell conditioned medium can
induce odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. Journal
of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2011. 5(5): p. 354-362.
21. Du, Z., et al., Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium reduces
liver injury and enhances regeneration in reduced-size rat liver
transplantation. J Surg Res, 2013. 183(2): p. 907-15.
22. van Poll, D., et al., Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules directly
modulate hepatocellular death and regeneration in vitro and in vivo.
Hepatology, 2008. 47(5): p. 1634-43.
23. Ionescu, L., et al., Stem cell conditioned medium improves acute lung
injury in mice: in vivo evidence for stem cell paracrine action. Am J Physiol
Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2012. 303(11): p. L967-77.
24. Monsel, A., et al., Mesenchymal stem cell derived secretome and
extracellular vesicles for acute lung injury and other inflammatory lung
diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2016. 16(7): p. 859-71.
25. Cantinieaux, D., et al., Conditioned medium from bone marrow-
derived mesenchymal stem cells improves recovery after spinal cord injury in
41
rats: an original strategy to avoid cell transplantation. PLoS One, 2013. 8(8):
p. e69515.
26. Tajiri, N., et al., Intravenous transplants of human adipose-derived
stem cell protect the brain from traumatic brain injury-induced
neurodegeneration and motor and cognitive impairments: cell graft
biodistribution and soluble factors in young and aged rats. J Neurosci, 2014.
34(1): p. 313-26.
27. Yamagata, M., et al., Human dental pulp-derived stem cells protect
against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonatal mice. Stroke, 2013. 44(2):
p. 551-4.
28. Potapova, I.A., et al., Mesenchymal stem cells support migration,
extracellular matrix invasion, proliferation, and survival of endothelial cells
in vitro. Stem Cells, 2007. 25(7): p. 1761-8.
29. Bhang, S.H., et al., Efficacious and clinically relevant conditioned
medium of human adipose-derived stem cells for therapeutic angiogenesis.
Mol Ther, 2014. 22(4): p. 862-72.
30. Chen, L., et al., Conditioned medium from hypoxic bone marrow-
derived mesenchymal stem cells enhances wound healing in mice. PLoS One,
2014. 9(4): p. e96161.
31. Li, H.S., et al., Cytokine profiles in conditioned media from cultured
human intervertebral disc tissue - Implications of their effect on bone marrow
stem cell metabolism. Acta Orthopaedica, 2005. 76(1): p. 115-121.
32. Kapiteijn, K., et al., Human embryo-conditioned medium stimulates
42
in vitro endometrial angiogenesis. Fertil Steril, 2006. 85 Suppl 1: p. 1232-9.
33. Moore, M.A.S., Cytokine and chemokine networks influencing stem
cell proliferation, differentiation, and marrow homing. Journal of Cellular
Biochemistry, 2002: p. 29-38.
34. Liu, H., et al., MEPE is downregulated as dental pulp stem cells
differentiate. Archives of Oral Biology, 2005. 50(11): p. 923-928.
35. Nakashima, M., Bone morphogenetic proteins in dentin regeneration
for potential use in endodontic therapy. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews,
2005. 16(3): p. 369-376.
36. Di Santo, S., et al., Novel Cell-Free Strategy for Therapeutic
Angiogenesis: In Vitro Generated Conditioned Medium Can Replace
Progenitor Cell Transplantation. Plos One, 2009. 4(5).
37. Lee, M.J., et al., Enhancement of wound healing by secretory factors
of endothelial precursor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells.
Cytotherapy, 2011. 13(2): p. 165-78.
38. Sze, S.K., et al., Elucidating the secretion proteome of human
embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Cell Proteomics,
2007. 6(10): p. 1680-9.
39. Nishimura, I., et al., Precursor tissue analogs as a tissue-engineering
strategy. Tissue Eng, 2003. 9 Suppl 1: p. S77-89.
40. Gharaei, M.A., et al., Human dental pulp stromal cell conditioned
medium alters endothelial cell behavior. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2018.
9.
43
41. Dowling, P. and M. Clynes, Conditioned media from cell lines: a
complementary model to clinical specimens for the discovery of disease-
specific biomarkers. Proteomics, 2011. 11(4): p. 794-804.
42. Thesleff, I. and T. Aberg, Molecular regulation of tooth development.
Bone, 1999. 25(1): p. 123-5.
43. Tompkins, K., Molecular mechanisms of cytodifferentiation in
mammalian tooth development. CONect Tissue Res, 2006. 47(3): p. 111-8.
44. Thesleff, I., et al., Interference of tooth differentiation with interposed
filters. Dev Biol, 1977. 58(1): p. 197-203.
45. Jiang, N., et al., Exosomes Mediate Epithelium-Mesenchyme
Crosstalk in Organ Development. ACS Nano, 2017. 11(8): p. 7736-7746.
46. Huang, C.C., et al., Exosomes as biomimetic tools for stem cell
differentiation: Applications in dental pulp tissue regeneration. Biomaterials,
2016. 111: p. 103-115.
47. Narayanan, R., C.C. Huang, and S. Ravindran, Hijacking the Cellular
Mail: Exosome Mediated Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem
Cells International, 2016.
48. Ueno, A., et al., MC3T3-E1-conditioned medium-induced
mineralization by clonal rat dental pulp cells. Matrix Biol, 2001. 20(5-6): p.
347-55.
49. Shapiro, I.M., W.J. Landis, and M.V. Risbud, Matrix vesicles: Are
they anchored exosomes? Bone, 2015. 79: p. 29-36.
50. Anderson, H.C., R. Garimella, and S.E. Tague, The role of matrix
44
vesicles in growth plate development and biomineralization. Front Biosci,
2005. 10: p. 822-37.
51. Bernard, G.W. and D.C. Pease, An electron microscopic study of
initial intramembranous osteogenesis. Am J Anat, 1969. 125(3): p. 271-90.
52. Golub, E.E., Role of matrix vesicles in biomineralization. Biochim
Biophys Acta, 2009. 1790(12): p. 1592-8.
53. Hayashi, Y. and H. Nagasawa, Matrix vesicles isolated from apical
pulp of rat incisors: crystal formation in low Ca x Pi ion-product medium
containing beta-glycerophosphate. Calcif Tissue Int, 1990. 47(6): p. 365-72.
54. Kirsch, T., Determinants of pathological mineralization. Curr Opin
Rheumatol, 2006. 18(2): p. 174-80.
55. Golub, E.E., et al., Induction of chondrocyte vesiculation in vitro. J
Biol Chem, 1983. 258(1): p. 616-21.
56. Colombo, M., G. Raposo, and C. Thery, Biogenesis, secretion, and
intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu
Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2014. 30: p. 255-89.
57. Akisaka, T. and C.V. Gay, The plasma membrane and matrix vesicles
of mouse growth plate chondrocytes during differentiation as revealed in
freeze-fracture replicas. Am J Anat, 1985. 173(4): p. 269-86.
58. Hale, J.E. and R.E. Wuthier, The mechanism of matrix vesicle
formation. Studies on the composition of chondrocyte microvilli and on the
effects of microfilament-perturbing agents on cellular vesiculation. J Biol
Chem, 1987. 262(4): p. 1916-25.
45
59. Dahbour, S., et al., Mesenchymal stem cells and conditioned media
in the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients: Clinical, ophthalmological and
radiological assessments of safety and efficacy. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2017.
23(11): p. 866-874.
60. Fukuoka, H. and H. Suga, Hair Regeneration Treatment Using
Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Conditioned Medium: Follow-up With
Trichograms. Eplasty, 2015. 15: p. e10.
61. Sohn, S.J., et al., Anti-aging Properties of Conditioned Media of
Epidermal Progenitor Cells Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 2018. 8(2): p. 229-244.
62. Doseff, A.I., Apoptosis: the sculptor of development. Stem Cells Dev,
2004. 13(5): p. 473-83.
63. Matalova, E., A.S. Tucker, and P.T. Sharpe, Death in the life of a tooth.
Journal of Dental Research, 2004. 83(1): p. 11-16.
64. Matalova, E., E. Svandova, and A.S. Tucker, Apoptotic signaling in
mouse odontogenesis. OMICS, 2012. 16(1-2): p. 60-70.
65. Fleischmannova, J., et al., Mouse models of tooth abnormalities. Eur
J Oral Sci, 2008. 116(1): p. 1-10.
66. Kim, J.Y., et al., Inhibition of apoptosis in early tooth development
alters tooth shape and size. J Dent Res, 2006. 85(6): p. 530-5.
67. An, S., et al., Short-term effects of calcium ions on the apoptosis and
onset of mineralization of human dental pulp cells in vitro and in vivo. Int J
Mol Med, 2015. 36(1): p. 215-21.
46
68. Joo, K.H., et al., Cytokine Expression of Stem Cells Originating from
the Apical Complex and Coronal Pulp of Immature Teeth. J Endod, 2018.
44(1): p. 87-92 e1.
69. Yang, X., et al., Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce odontogenic
differentiation of dental pulp-derived stem cells. J Cell Biochem, 2012. 113(2):
p. 669-77.
70. Fujita, H., et al., Necrotic and apoptotic cells serve as nuclei for
calcification on osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells
in vitro. Cell Biochemistry and Function, 2014. 32(1): p. 77-86.
71. Kirsch, T., W. Wang, and D. Pfander, Functional differences between
growth plate apoptotic bodies and matrix vesicles. Journal of Bone and
Mineral Research, 2003. 18(10): p. 1872-1881.
72. Wuthier, R.E. and G.F. Lipscomb, Matrix vesicles: structure,
composition, formation and function in calcification. Frontiers in Bioscience-
Landmark, 2011. 16: p. 2812-+.
73. Hatori, M., et al., End labeling studies of fragmented DNA in the
avian growth plate: evidence of apoptosis in terminally differentiated
chondrocytes. J Bone Miner Res, 1995. 10(12): p. 1960-8.
74. Mansfield, K., R. Rajpurohit, and I.M. Shapiro, Extracellular
phosphate ions cause apoptosis of terminally differentiated epiphyseal
chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol, 1999. 179(3): p. 276-86.
75. Keklikoglu, N. and S. Akinci, ATF-2 immunoreactivity in post-
mitotic and terminally differentiated human odontoblasts. Med Mol Morphol,
47
2015. 48(3): p. 164-8.
76. Ogbureke, K.U.E. and L.W. Fisher, Expression of SIBLINGs and
their partner MMPs in salivary glands. Journal of Dental Research, 2004.
83(9): p. 664-670.
77. Ikeda, E., et al., Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as
an organ replacement therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009. 106(32): p.
13475-80.
78. Lee, H.K., et al., Odontoblastic inductive potential of epithelial cells
derived from human deciduous dental pulp. J Mol Histol, 2016. 47(3): p. 345-
51.
79. Kawamura, R., et al., EDTA soluble chemical components and the
conditioned medium from mobilized dental pulp stem cells contain an
inductive microenvironment, promoting cell proliferation, migration, and
odontoblastic differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2016. 7(1): p. 77.
80. Yang, Z.H., et al., Apical tooth germ cell-conditioned medium
enhances the differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells into
cementum/periodontal ligament-like tissues. J Periodontal Res, 2009. 44(2):
p. 199-210.
81. Al-Sharabi, N., et al., Bone marrow stromal cell paracrine factors
direct osteo/odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp cells. Tissue Eng Part
A, 2014. 20(21-22): p. 3063-72.
82. Oh, H.J., et al., CPNE7, a preameloblast-derived factor, regulates
odontoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 2015.
48
37: p. 208-17.
83. Osugi, M., et al., Conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells
enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects. Tissue Eng Part A,
2012. 18(13-14): p. 1479-89.
84. Wu, J., et al., Conditioned medium from periapical follicle cells
induces the odontogenic differentiation of stem cells from the apical papilla
in vitro. J Endod, 2013. 39(8): p. 1015-22.
85. Kang, K.J., et al., Indirect co-culture of stem cells from human
exfoliated deciduous teeth and oral cells in a microfluidic platform. Tissue
Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2016. 13(4): p. 428-436.
86. Bianco, P., et al., Bone sialoprotein (BSP) secretion and osteoblast
differentiation: relationship to bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, alkaline
phosphatase, and matrix deposition. J Histochem Cytochem, 1993. 41(2): p.
183-91.
87. Zhu, X.L., et al., Synthesis and processing of bone sialoproteins
during de novo bone formation in vitro. Biochem Cell Biol, 2001. 79(6): p.
737-46.
88. Gordon, J.A., et al., Bone sialoprotein expression enhances
osteoblast differentiation and matrix mineralization in vitro. Bone, 2007.
41(3): p. 462-73.
89. Hao, J., et al., Differential expression patterns of the dentin matrix
proteins during mineralized tissue formation. Bone, 2004. 34(6): p. 921-32.
90. Cho, Y.D., et al., Molecular Regulation of Matrix Extracellular
49
Phosphoglycoprotein Expression by Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Journal
of Biological Chemistry, 2009. 284(37): p. 25230-25240.
91. Staines, K.A., et al., MEPE is a novel regulator of growth plate
cartilage mineralization. Bone, 2012. 51(3): p. 418-430.
92. Miyazaki, T., et al., Inhibition of the terminal differentiation of
odontoblasts and their transdifferentiation into osteoblasts in Runx2
transgenic mice. Arch Histol Cytol, 2008. 71(2): p. 131-46.
93. Doi, Y., et al., Immobilized Dpp and Other Proteins Modify Ocp
Formation. Calcified Tissue International, 1993. 52(2): p. 139-145.
94. Sodek, K.L., et al., Relationships between bone protein and mineral
in developing porcine long bone and calvaria. Bone, 2000. 26(2): p. 189-198.
95. Prasad, M., W.T. Butler, and C. Qin, Dentin sialophosphoprotein in
biomineralization. CONect Tissue Res, 2010. 51(5): p. 404-17.
96. Joshi, R., et al., Dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) gene-silencing
inhibits key tumorigenic activities in human oral cancer cell line, OSC2.
PLoS One, 2010. 5(11): p. e13974.
50
국문초록
사람 치아 상피세포에 의한
치수 줄기세포의 상아모세포 분화 유도
채 근 영
서울대학교 대학원 치의과학과 분자유전학 전공
(지도교수 이 진)
치아 발생과 재생 과정은 상피와 외배엽성 간엽 줄기세포 간의 다양한
상호작용으로 이루어지며 치아를 구성하는 법랑질 및 상아질은 이러한
상피-간엽 상호작용을 통해 분화된 법랑모세포와 상아모세포로부터
형성된다. 현재까지의 치아재생 연구는 분리 및 유지가 용이한 치수
간엽줄기세포를 중심으로 이루어졌는데, 반면에, 치아 상피세포는 치아
발생이 끝나고 나면 대부분 소실되기 때문에 확보 및 활용이 어려워
관련 연구가 많이 이루어지지 못하였다. 최근 선행 연구를 통해 사람
치주조직으로부터 치아 상피세포인 Hertwig’s epithelial root
sheath/epithelial rests of Malassez (HERS/ERM)가 확보되었으며
HERS/ERM 세포주 또한 확립되었으나 아직까지 치아조직재생에 대한
HERS/ERM의 역할에 대해서는 충분한 검증이 이루어지지 않았다. 본
연구에서는 사람 유치 치수줄기세포(stem cells from exfoliated
deciduous teeth, SHED)에 HERS/ERM 세포주의 조건배지를 처리한 후
SHED의 상아모세포 분화 능력을 관찰함으로서 치아재생 과정의 상피-
51
간엽 상호작용에서 HERS/ERM의 역할을 확인하고자 하였다. 사람 유치
치수에서 SHED를 일차 배양하였고, HERS/ERM 세포주를 48시간 동안
배양하여 얻은 조건배지를 SHED에 10, 40, 80%(v/v)로 처리하였다.
다만, 조건배지를 40%와 80%로 추가할 때에는 용량을 최소화시키기
위해 조건배지를 동결건조로 농축시킨 후 사용하였다. 조건배지를
처리한 SHED는 Alizarin red S staining, RT-qPCR, Western blot 및
DAPI 핵염색을 시행하여 상아모세포로의 분화 유무를 확인하였고,
세포배양 과정을 거치지 않은 조건배지의 basal media를 추가하여
대조군으로 사용하였다. Alizarin red S 염색 결과 조건배지의 농도가
증가함에 따라 12일에서 20일까지 칼슘 침착이 증가하는 것을 볼 수
있었다. 경조직의 특이 유전자인 BSP, DMP1과 MEPE의 발현도
조건배지의 농도가 증가함에 따라 8, 12일에 상승하였고, RUNX2, ON과
OC는 줄어드는 양상을 보였다. 반면에, 대조군으로서 조건배지의 basal
media만 추가한 경우 Alizarin red S 염색이 되지 않았으며 유전자 발현
양상도 분화에 따른 변화가 없었다. 상아모세포 표지단백질인 dentin
phosphoprotein 단백질 또한 16, 20일간 조건배지가 처리된 SHED에서
발현됨을 확인하였고, 대조군에서보다 더 많이 발현되는 것을
확인하였다. SHED에 조건배지를 처리하면서 장기간 배양하였을 때
대조군과는 달리 세포가 죽는 현상이 관찰되었고, DAPI 핵염색을 통해
관찰하였을 때 terminal differentiation과 연관있는 cell death와 같은
현상임이 추정된다. 이상의 연구결과를 종합하면 사람 HERS/ERM
세포주의 조건배지가 SHED의 상아모세포 분화를 유도하며 조건배지의
농도가 증가함에 따라 분화시기를 앞당기고 분화효율이 향상됨을 알 수
52
있었다. 따라서 HERS/ERM이 SHED의 상아모세포 분화에 미치는
영향은 조건배지를 통하여 상피에서 간엽간으로 정보가 전달됨으로써
이루어지는 것을 확인하였으나 분화유도물질의 발굴 및 동정과 같은
후속연구가 필요할 것이다.
……………………………………
주요어 : 사람 치주 조직 유래 상피세포, 사람 유치 치수 간엽줄기세포,
상피-간엽 상호작용, 조건배지, 치아 발생 및 재생, 상아모세포 분화
학 번 : 2017-24083