detailed design review p11451
DESCRIPTION
Detailed Design Review P11451. Cook Stove Test Stand Group February 4 th 2011 David Sam (ME) Huseyin Zorba (ISE) Phillip Amsler (ME). Agenda. Introduction for the Project Status Customer Needs Engineering Specifications System Level Work Risks Schedule - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Detailed Design Review P11451
Cook Stove Test Stand GroupFebruary 4th 2011
David Sam (ME)Huseyin Zorba (ISE)Phillip Amsler (ME)
Agenda
• Introduction for the Project Status• Customer Needs • Engineering Specifications • System Level Work • Risks• Schedule • Bill of Materials • Modifications on Test Stand • Calculations & Feasibility Analysis• Data Acquisition • Preliminary Test Plan • Process Flow Chart • Issues
Meeting Purpose
1. Overview of the Project 2. Confirm its Functionality of the Design 3. Receive feedback from attendees on critical
technical issues 4. Receive approval from Customer to complete
design as presented 5. Receive approval from Customer to purchase
materials & services for project
Action List
DESIGN INPUTS
Customer Needs
Engineering Specifications
System Level Work
InputsTest Standards
a)Charcoalb)Stove (Any Kind)c)Test Type (Short, Relevant, WBT)d)Lighting Technique
SYSTEM
Outputsa)Emissionsb)Solid Wastesc)Test Timed)Efficiencye)Statistical Accuracy
System Level Work
Improvement Assessment
Change in Design Waste Management
Impact AssessmentEcological Health
InventoryQuantify:Raw Material,Energy,Waste Perform the Test
GoalProject Scope
Fish Bone
Risk List
Schedule
Integrated Test Strategy
• Performed 1 Comparison Test – Boiling Times were found for 3 different stoves
• The data outputs are shared among PM’s• New Tests with Stove Design Team– Flow Rate– Skirt Size– Pot Shape
Bill of Materials
DESIGN OUTPUTS
Proposed Test Stand
Modifications on Test Stand
SET-UP TIME≈ 5 MINUTES
Modifications for Measurement
• OLD • NEW
Modifications for Measurement
OLD
NEW
Improved Functionality
• New thermocouple mount – New steel mount to replace previous wooden
mount. Mount is also insulated to reduce impact of ambient temperatures on water temperature readings.
• Test stand now has two handles and larger wheels to provide easier transportation. – Test stand can be transported by one user and is
very durable.
Improved Mass Measurements
• By sealing openings in the bottom of the test stand, “noise” in mass measurements have been improved. The impact of wind has a substantially smaller impact on the test stand. Mass measurements from Stovetec stove support the test stand improvements.
Installation of CO monitor
• New monitor has been installed in the exhaust stream of the test stand.
• It allows USB interface to recover data instead of burdening tester with recording data every minute.
Design Calculations
Convective Heat Transfer
Stove
q
q
q
• Assume Stove is a cylinder D~15”, H~20”A=.6m2
• h (air free convection) range 5-10 W/m2K – Use 10 for conservative value
• Ts~600°C
• T∞ range -10°C to 30°C
• q=h*A*(Ts-T∞)• Hot q=3420W• Cold q=3660W• Δq =240W or ~5% of total output of
stove (using 5kW output)
• Use area and temperatures from previous– Ts~600°C=873K
– T∞ range -10°C to 30°C=263K to 303K– A=.6m2
• Assume Steel (ξ=.07)• q=σ*ξ*A*(Ts
4-T∞4)
– σ=5.6703E-8 W/m2K4
• Hot q=1363W• Cold q=1372W• Δq=9W or ~.2% of total output of stove
(using 5kW output)
Radiation Heat Transfer
Stove
q
q
q
Feasibility Analysis-Stove Tec
Carbon Monoxide
CO
• In a water boil test, CO emissions should be lowest during the simmer phase, however during these three tests there is a spike or “noise” during the simmer phase in all three instances. – Hypothesis– Charcoal is shifting position during the simmer
phase, creating abnormalities in CO emissions.– Test – Place stove in test stand and record emission data for
Stovetec stove during combustion without pot of water. Every five minutes, stir charcoal around in stove and after recovering CO data from logger, determine if at every 5 minute interval there was a significant shift in CO emissions.
Water Temperature
Weight-Before
Weight-After
Efficiency
Modified WBT Output 1-Rebar Stove
Simmering starts at 16th min
Modified WBT Output 2-Rebar Stove
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 409.5
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
Weight vs Time
Weight (kg) 1
Time (min)
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Simmering starts at 16th min
Modified WBT Analysis-Rebar Stove
Data Acquisition
Desired Outputs
Measured Quantity
Acquisition Method
Efficiency H2O Temp, Mass
Thermal couple with data loggingScale with operator recording (written notes)
CO Emissions PPM, Flow Rate
EL-USB-CO data logging deviceHot wire anemometer with uniform flow assumption.
Particulate Emissions
Mass WIP
Efficiency Acquisition
• Known values for the Efficiency are: Heat Capacity of Water(cp), Latent Heat (LH) of Water, Heating Value (HV) of charcoal, and Heating Value of butane.
• To calculate Efficiency we need: mwater, Water Temperatures, mevaportated, mfuel, mbutane. – All of this data comes from measurement devices as well as initial and
final test measurements.
• To have the scale output over RS232 will require expensive software or a different model scale. Therefore we are recommending manual data input for mass only.
)*()*(
)*()**(
tantan ebuebufuelfuel
waterevaporatedwaterpwater
HVmHVm
LHmTcmEfficiency
CO Acquisition
Distance Air Velocity 1 Air Velocity 2 Air Velocity 3 Average Air V Dist (r)(in) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft)
0 977.7 -0.250.5 999 1091 952 1014.0 -0.20833
1 1062 1056 1033 1050.3 -0.166671.5 1131 1059 1056 1082.0 -0.125
2 1074 1025 1022 1040.3 -0.083332.5 1076 1007 1025 1036.0 -0.04167
3 1064 1027 1011 1034.0 03.5 1054 992 1025 1023.7 0.041667
4 1053 986 1027 1022.0 0.0833334.5 1074 1026 1026 1042.0 0.125
5 1124 1016 1041 1060.3 0.1666675.5 990 1001 1019 1003.3 0.208333
6 946.3 0.25
Start with calculating the flow rate.
Turbulent Air Flow Cont.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Flow Rate
Air Velocity 1
Air Velocity 2
Air Velocity 3
Average Air V
Average Vel
Distance from Center (ft)
Flui
d Ve
loci
ty (ft
/min
)
Volumetric Flow Calculation
Ring Velocity (ft/min) dA ft2 Flow CFM1 985 0.0600 59.122 1032 0.0491 50.663 1059 0.0382 40.424 1047 0.0273 28.545 1031 0.0164 16.866 1031 0.0055 5.62
SUM 201
Numerical Integration Uniform Flow Assumption
Average Vel 1037 ft/minStdDev 22.0 ft/minArea 0.196 ft^2
Flow Rate 204 CFMMin 199 CFMMax 208 CFM
CO Output
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50
102030405060708090
100
CO (ppm) vs Time (not actual data)
Time (min)
Co (p
pm)
dA
– When given ppm vs. time take integral using differential area with trapezoid method.
CO continued
• After integrating and taking sum of differential areas, then units = ppm*min
• Using standard air 1ppm CO=1.23mg CO per m3 air.– ppm is a mass concentration of CO compared
to the fluid it is in.• Finally convert 204 CFM to 5.777 m3 /min• Then
dA
dt
d(pp
m)
min]/[777.5*][
]/[23.1*min]*[][ 3
3
airmppm
airmmgCOppmAreaCOm
Particulate Matter Acquisition Concept
Sampling Entire Exhaust Stream• Advantages
– Using a settling chamber is easy to integrate
– Can obtain an absolute value for total particles collected
– No moving parts
• Disadvantages– No real time results– According to EPA, only particles
with diameter < 75 µm would settle
– Semi-volatile organic compounds would not settle
Sampling % of Exhaust Stream• Advantages
– Can provide numerous samples during one test
– Capture smaller particles– Can have samples sent to NTID
for chemical breakdown
• Disadvantages– No real time results– Difficult to implement– Dealing with heat and humidity– Only provides a rank
comparison
Proposed Sampling System
• Based off concept from last year’s Testing Team and team 10056’s design
• Additional information from WBT publication, appendix 6. Emission Measurement
Concept• Cyclone
– Separate larger diameter particles that don’t need to be measured
• Filter & Holder– Cambridge Filter & Holder system
from team 10056
• Impinger– Filled with methanol to collect any
remaining gaseous particles for visual analysis and to protect pump
• Vacuum Pump– Find acceptable pump for system,
perhaps borrow pump from Dr. Robinson’s lab temporarily
Emissions
Most of Exhaust
Concept Analysis
Advantages• Can hopefully obtain most
parts from Team 10056• With help from Dr. Hanzlik,
quickly set up an experimental system to test feasibility
• Filters can be sent to NTID lab for chemical composition breakdown
Disadvantages• Could be difficult to integrate
to maintain a mobile test stand• Could impact CO monitoring
which is downstream (relocation of monitor?)
• Does not provide an absolute value for comparison
• Only a rank comparison between stoves tested by RIT
Preliminary Test Plan
Plans for MSD2Week # Test Plan
Week 1 • 3 Cold Start for each stove to achieve repeatable time to boil• Implement Particulate Matter Monitor
Week 2 3 Modified WBT for each stoves efficiencies, CO, and firepower
Week 3 Perform 3 full WBT for each stove
Week 4 • Take experience gained and draft test procedures, and testing template• “Peel Onion” and test more extreme cases
Week 5 • Feedback and Analysis of testing procedure• Receive Refurbished CO meter
Week 6 Have other groups use test procedure, and continue to gather data
Week 7 Perform “realistic” test on each stove and gain efficiencies
Week 8 Prepare Imagine RIT presentation and poster
Week 9 Print materials and present at Imagine RIT
Week 10 Finalize work and presentation
Process Flow Chart (a)
Process Flow Chart (b)
Issues
Issue List
Issue Analysis
Issue Analysis Cont.
Max H2O Temp =100.2◦C
Questions?