culture, sport and wellbeing evidence programme systematic ... · ms. lily grigsby-duffy, dr...

11
1 Culture, Sport and Wellbeing Evidence Programme Systematic Review #3 Protocol Visual Arts, Mental Health and Wellbeing SR#3 Team (in alphabetical order): Dr Kerry Ball, Professor Norma Daykin, Professor Paul Dolan, Ms. Lily Grigsby-Duffy, Dr Alistair John, Professor Guy Julier, Professor Tess Kay, Mr. Jack Lane, Dr Louise Mansfield, Professor Catherine Meads, Dr Christine Tapson, Mr. Stefano Testoni, Professor Alan Tomlinson, Professor Christina Victor Background The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the subjective wellbeing outcomes of visual arts interventions for adults (“working-age”, 15-64 years), who have been diagnosed with a mental health condition. Mental health conditions represent almost 50% of all illnesses in people younger than 65 years (Uttley et al., 2015). Whilst mental health problems account for a high degree of sickness, the NHS budget to treat people with mental illness is relatively modest, and the costs (from unemployment, sick leave, crime, etc.) and impact of mental illness on an individual and community level are significant. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) estimated that - in 2015 – mental health problems cost the UK economy approximately £80 billion (Naylor et al., 2016). Therefore, the NHS has come under increasing pressure to initiate cost-effective alternatives to better manage the needs of people suffering from mental health conditions (Uttley et al., 2015). It is progressively recognised that visual arts projects can reduce the burden on the NHS (White, 2004), by encouraging community relationships and providing skills that increase personal expression and control (Malley et al., 2002). As Professor Michael Marmot points out, the degree to which people are able to participate in their community and exercise control over their own lives, provides a ‘critical contribution to psychosocial well-being and health’ (Foot, 2012: 3). The notion that arts-based initiatives can be beneficial for wellbeing and mental health is increasingly acknowledged, with a growing evidence base reinforcing anecdotal claims (Clift, 2012). Visual arts interventions have been shown to reduce anxiety and improve mood (Bell and Robins, 2007), enhance self-reported health (Johansson et al., 2001), promote personal growth through skill acquisition and improve self-esteem and quality of life (Hacking et al.,

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    Culture,SportandWellbeingEvidenceProgramme

    SystematicReview#3Protocol

    VisualArts,MentalHealthandWellbeing

    SR#3Team(inalphabeticalorder):DrKerryBall,ProfessorNormaDaykin,ProfessorPaulDolan,Ms.LilyGrigsby-Duffy,DrAlistairJohn,ProfessorGuyJulier,ProfessorTessKay,Mr.JackLane,DrLouiseMansfield,ProfessorCatherineMeads,DrChristineTapson,Mr.StefanoTestoni,ProfessorAlanTomlinson,ProfessorChristinaVictor

    Background

    Theaimofthissystematicreviewistoevaluatethesubjectivewellbeingoutcomesofvisualartsinterventionsforadults(“working-age”,15-64years),whohavebeendiagnosedwithamentalhealthcondition.

    Mentalhealthconditionsrepresentalmost50%ofallillnessesinpeopleyoungerthan65years(Uttleyetal.,2015).Whilstmentalhealthproblemsaccountforahighdegreeofsickness,theNHSbudgettotreatpeoplewithmentalillnessisrelativelymodest,andthecosts(fromunemployment,sickleave,crime,etc.)andimpactofmentalillnessonanindividualandcommunitylevelaresignificant.TheOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)estimatedthat-in2015–mentalhealthproblemscosttheUKeconomyapproximately£80billion(Nayloretal.,2016).Therefore,theNHShascomeunderincreasingpressuretoinitiatecost-effectivealternativestobettermanagetheneedsofpeoplesufferingfrommentalhealthconditions(Uttleyetal.,2015).ItisprogressivelyrecognisedthatvisualartsprojectscanreducetheburdenontheNHS(White,2004),byencouragingcommunityrelationshipsandprovidingskillsthatincreasepersonalexpressionandcontrol(Malleyetal.,2002).AsProfessorMichaelMarmotpointsout,thedegreetowhichpeopleareabletoparticipateintheircommunityandexercisecontrolovertheirownlives,providesa‘criticalcontributiontopsychosocialwell-beingandhealth’(Foot,2012:3).

    Thenotionthatarts-basedinitiativescanbebeneficialforwellbeingandmentalhealthisincreasinglyacknowledged,withagrowingevidencebasereinforcinganecdotalclaims(Clift,2012).Visualartsinterventionshavebeenshowntoreduceanxietyandimprovemood(BellandRobins,2007),enhanceself-reportedhealth(Johanssonetal.,2001),promotepersonalgrowththroughskillacquisitionandimproveself-esteemandqualityoflife(Hackingetal.,

  • 2

    2006),andpreventre-admissiontopsychiatrichospitals(White,2004).Inclinicalhealthcare,peoplearecommonlyregardedaspatients(Smith,2002),whereasinarts-basedinitiatives,peoplecanbecomeartistswithgenuinecontroloverwhattheyaredoingorcreating(ArgyleandBolton,2005).ArgyleandBolton(2005)foundthatpracticalinvolvementinvisualartsprovidedarangeofhealthandwellbeingbenefitsforvulnerableandmentallyillparticipants.Theyalsohighlighttherelativelylowcostofadministeringsomethingsimple,suchasadrawinggroup,whichcanhaveahighlyvaluableoutcomeforpeopleandcommunities(ArgyleandBolton,2005).

    Previousevidencereviewsinthisfieldhavefocussedon;thewellbeingandmentalhealthbenefitsofartsattendanceandparticipation(Jindal-Snapeetal.,2014);theclinicaleffectivenessandcost-effectivenessofarttherapyforthosewithnon-psychoticmentalhealthconditions(Uttleyetal.,2015);thewellbeingoutcomesofparticipatoryartsforolderadults(Castora-Binkleyetal.,2010);thetherapeuticbenefitsofcreativeactivitiesonmentalwellbeing(Leckey,2011);andtheimpactofart,designandenvironmentinamentalhealthcaresetting(Daykinetal.,2008).Theevidenceintheaforementionedreviewsgenerallypointstopositivewellbeingoutcomesforparticipantsinvolvedinvisual/creativeartinterventionsandprojects.However,itiswidelyacknowledgedthatasubstantialdegreeofevidencesupportingtheseclaimslacksreliabilityandvalidity,andisindistinctintheclarityofkeyterms,suchasmentalhealthandwellbeing(Leckey,2011).Whilstvisualartsinterventionsareincreasinglyunderstoodasapublichealthresource,whichcansupporthealthandwellbeing,thereneedstobeahigherlevelofrobustandcriticalevidenceoftheireffectiveness,outcomesandrealcosts(PublicHealthEngland,2016).Systematicreviewsplayacrucialroleingatheringandextractingmeaningfulandinfluentialevidence,butareequallyvaluableinlocatinggapsinresearch,exposingmethodologicalinadequacies(andtriumphs)andidentifyingfuture,morerigorous,researchobjectives.

    Toourknowledge,thisisthefirstsystematicreviewtospecificallyfocusonthesubjectivewellbeingoutcomesassociatedwithvisualartsparticipationforworkingageadults(15-64years)whohavebeendiagnosedwithamentalhealthcondition.

    Title

    Asystematicreviewofthewellbeingoutcomesofvisualartsforadults(“working-age”,15-64years)withmentalhealthconditions,andoftheprocessesbywhichwellbeingoutcomesareachieved.

  • 3

    ResearchQuestions1.Whatarethesubjectivewellbeingoutcomesofengagingwith(takingpartin,performing,viewing)visualartsforadults(“working-age’,15-64years)withdiagnosedmentalhealthconditions?

    2.Whataretheprocessesbywhichthesubjectivewellbeingoutcomesareachieved?

    Criteriaforconsideringreviewsforinclusion

    Population/typesofparticipants

    Adults(“working-age”,15-64years)withadiagnosedmentalhealthcondition,butexcludingdementia.Thepopulationwillincludeanygrouporindividualtakingpartin,performingorviewingvisualarts,butnotaspaidprofessionalartists.WewillincludestudiesfromcountrieseconomicallysimilartotheUK.

    Typesofinterventions

    Focusonparticipatoryvisualartinterventionsincludingmaking,viewingandperforming.Thiswillexcludearttherapyforclinicaloutcomesbutwillincludearts-basedwellbeinginterventionsofferedbyarangeofprofessionalsandvolunteers.Wewillalsoexcludeevidencerelatingtopaidprofessionalartistsandclinicalproceduressuchassurgery,medicaltestsanddiagnostics.

    Comparison

    Novisualartinterventionorusualroutine/care,i.e.aninactivecomparatororhistorical/time-basedcomparator,andincludingstudieswithanalternativeinterventionasthecomparator/comparisongroup(forinstance,sportordramaintervention).

    Typesofoutcomemeasure

    Includedstudiesmusthavemeasuredwellbeing.Studieswillneedtohavemeasuredsubjectivewellbeingusinganyrecognisedmethodormeasure.

    Forthehealtheconomiccomponentkeyoutcomesaretheoutputsfromcost,cost-utility,cost-effectiveness,cost-benefitandcost-consequenceanalyses.

  • 4

    Typesofstudies/studydesign

    Empiricalresearch:quantitative,qualitativeormixedmethods,outcomesorprocessevaluations,andpublishedfrom2007-2017,willbeincluded.Greyliteratureandpracticesurveyspublishedfrom2014willbeincluded.Discussionarticles,commentariesoropinionpiecesnotpresentingempiricalortheoreticalresearchwillbeexcluded.

    Searchmethodsforidentificationofreviews

    Electronicsearches

    Electronicdatabaseswillbesearchedusingacombinationofcontrolledvocabulary(MeSH)andfreetextterms.Searchtermswillbeincorporatedtotargetempiricalevidenceonvisualarts,mentalhealthandwellbeing.Wewillincorporatespecificfilterstoidentifyhealtheconomicevaluations.TheOVIDMEDLINEsearchstrategycanbefoundbelow.Alldatabasesearcheswillbebasedonthisstrategybutwillbeappropriatelyrevisedtosuiteachdatabase.Thefollowingdatabaseswillbesearchedfrom2007-2017:

    • PsychInfo• OVIDMEDLINE• Eric• ArtsandHumanitiesCitationIndex(WebofScience)• SocialScienceCitationIndex(WebofScience)• ScienceCitationIndex(WebofScience)• Scopus• PILOTS• CINAHL• InternationalIndextoPerformingArts(IIPA)

    Forthereviewofhealtheconomicevaluationswewillseparatelysearchthefollowingdatabases:

    • OVIDMEDLINE• Scopus• CINAHL• NHSEED(NHSEconomicEvaluationDatabase)• HTATechnologyAssessment)database

  • 5

    Searchingothersources

    Thereferencelistsofallrelevantsystematicreviewsfromthelast5yearswillbehand-searchedtoattempttoidentifyadditionalrelevantempiricalevidence.Asearchof‘greyliterature’willbeconductedviaanonlinecallforevidence.Greyliteraturewillbeincludedifitisafinalevaluationorreportincorporatingempiricaldata,hastheevaluationofavisualartsinterventionasthecentralobjective,waspublishedbetween2014-2017,andincludesdetailsofauthors(individuals,groupsororganisations).

    Identificationofstudiesforinclusion

    Searchresultswillbe independentlycheckedbytwooverviewauthorsandeligiblestudieswillbeincluded.Initiallythetitlesandabstractsofidentifiedstudieswillbereviewed.Ifitisclearfromthetitleandabstractthatthestudydoesnotmeettheinclusioncriteriaitwillbeexcluded.Where it isnotclearfromthetitleandabstractwhetherastudy isrelevantthefull article will be checked to confirm its eligibility. The selection criteria will beindependently applied to the full papers of identified reviews by two overview authors.Where two independent reviewers do not agree in their primary judgements they willdiscuss the conflict and attempt to reach a consensus. If they cannot agree then a thirdmember of the review teamwill consider the title and amajority decisionwill bemade.Studiesinanylanguagewillbeincluded.

    Datacollectionandanalysis

    Dataextractionandmanagement

    Datawillbeextractedindependentlybytwooverviewauthorsusingastandardisedform.Anydiscrepancieswillberesolvedbyconsensus.Whereagreementcannotbereached,athirdoverviewauthorwillconsiderthepaperandamajoritydecisionwillbereached.

    Forquantitativeevidenceofinterventioneffectiveness,thedataextractionformwillincludethefollowingdetails:

    • Evaluationdesignandobjectives(theinterventionsstudiedandcontrolconditionsused,includingdetailwhereavailableontheinterventioncontent,doseandadherence,andethics)

    • Sample(size,eligibilitycriteria,representativeness,reportingondrop-out,attritionanddetailsofparticipantsincludingdemographicsandprotectedcharacteristics)

  • 6

    • Theoutcomemeasures(independence,validity,reliability,appropriatenesstowellbeingimpactquestions)

    • Analysis(assessmentofthemethodologicalquality/riskofbias)• Resultsandconclusionsrelatingtorelevantobjectives• Thepresenceofpossibleconflictsofinterestforauthors/fundingbodies

    Forqualitativeevidenceofinterventioneffectivenessthedataextractionformwillincludethefollowingdetails:

    • Researchdesignandobjectives(interpretive,examiningsubjectiveexperiencesofparticipants,ethics)

    • Datacollection(type/form,appropriateness,recording,theoreticaljustification)• Participants(numbersanddetailsincludingdemographic,recruitmentstrategy,

    theoreticaljustification)• Analysis(rigor,assessmentofmethodologicalquality,identificationof

    bias/involvementofresearcher,attributionofdatatorespondents,theoreticaljustification,relevancetowellbeingimpactquestion)

    Forhealtheconomicstudieswewillextractthefollowingadditionalinformation:

    • Includedstudydesigns,analyticmethods,perspective,timehorizon,discountrate• Typeofsensitivityanalysisundertaken• Typeandsourcesofdatauseforresourceuseandcosts,reportingfiguresforcosts;• Methodsofpreferenceelicitation(e.g.contingentvaluation,revealedpreferences,

    trade-offmethods),reportingestimatesofpreferencevalues• MainresultsincludingspecifiedtypesofICERs(e.g.healthserviceorsocietal

    perspective)• Mainhealtheconomicconclusionsofthereview

    Wewillcontacttheauthorsofarticlesintheeventthattherequiredinformationcannotbeextractedfromthestudiesandisessentialforinterpretationoftheirresults.

    Assessmentofmethodologicalqualityofincludedstudies

    WewillusethequalitychecklistsandstandardapproachesforassessingqualityofincludedstudiesforquantitativeandqualitativestudiesdetailedintheWhatWorksCentreforWellbeingmethodsguide;andforeconomicevaluationsuseTheDrummondChecklist(1996)toassessthemethodologicalqualityofthestudies.

    Includedstudiesarelikelytohaveassessedthemethodologicalquality/riskofbiasinavarietyofways.Wewillusethejudgementsmadebytheauthorsofstudiesregardingthe

  • 7

    qualityofevidence/riskofbiasandreportitwithinthecontextofourassessmentofthequalityofastudyitself.

    Datasynthesis

    Wewilltabulatesummariesofthecharacteristicsoftheincludedstudies.

    Theprecisefindingspresentedwillprimarilybedeterminedbythecontentoftheincludedstudies.Wewillpresenteffectsizesusingappropriatemetricsincludingestimatesofprecision.Datawillbegroupedaccordingtovisualartinterventiontypeandwellbeingoutcomes.Wewillreportonprocessesbywhichinterventionsworkanddonotwork,forwhomandinwhatcontextsinenhancingwellbeing.Importantlimitationswithintheevidencebasewillbepresentedanddiscussed.Wewillconsiderthepossibleinfluenceofpublication/smallstudybiasesonstudyfindings.WhereincludedstudieshavenotratedthequalityofthebodyofevidencewewillapplytheGRADEapproachforkeyfindings.

    Forhealtheconomicevidencewewillsummarisethestudydesigns,analyticmethods,perspective,timehorizon,discountrate,typeofsensitivityanalysisundertaken,typeandsourcesofdatauseforresourceuseandcosts,reportingfiguresforcosts,methodsandresultsofpreferenceelicitation,mainresultsincludingspecifiedtypesofICERs(e.g.healthserviceorsocietalperspectivewithandwithouthealthcaresavings)andmainhealtheconomicconclusionsofthereview.

    DemonstrationSearchStrategy(OVIDMEDLINE)

    1. MeSHdescriptor:[wellbeing]2. well-being3. wellbeing4. “visualart*”.mp5. drawing.mp6. painting.mp7. sculpture.mp8. craft*.mp9. handicraft.mp10. ceramics.mp11. pottery.mp12. printmaking.mp13. knitting.mp14. woodwork.mp15. textiles.mp16. tapestry.mp17. dressmaking.mp18. “clothesmaking”.mp

  • 8

    19. upholstery.mp20. crochet*.mp21. illustration.mp22. photography.mp23. video.mp24. filmmaking.mp25. “movingimage”.mp26. animation.mp27. “computergames”.mp28. “digitalart”.mp29. “internetart”.mp30. “performanceart”.mp31. “communityart”.mp32. “bodypainting”.mp33. “bodyart”.mp34. “facepainting”.mp35. graffiti.mp36. “streetart”.mp37. “publicart”.mp38. “urbandesign”.mp39. “landscapearchitecture”.mp40. “participatoryart”.mp41. gardening.mp42. “landart”.mp43. “interiordesign”.mp44. “interiordecoration”.mp45. “graphicdesign”.mp46. (1or2or3)and(4or5or6or7or8or9or10or11or12or13or14or15or16or

    17or18,or19or20or21or22or23or24or25or26or27or28or29or30or31or32or33or34or35or36or37or38or39or40or41or42or43or44or45)

    47. “mentalhealth”.mp48. “mentalillness”.mp49. anxiety.mp50. phobias.mp51. “mooddisorders”.mp52. depression.mp53. bipolar.mp54. “postnataldepression”.mp55. “seasonalaffectivedisorder”.mp56. mania.mp57. hypomania.mp58. “obsessivecompulsivedisorder”.mp

  • 9

    59. “psychoticdisorders”.mp60. schizophrenia.mp61. hallucinations.mp62. delusions.mp63. paranoia.mp64. “splitpersonality”.mp65. “personalitydisorder”.mp66. “dissociativeidentitydisorder”.mp67. stress.mp68. psychosis.mp69. “panicdisorder”.mp70. “panicattacks”.mp71. addiction.mp72. “substanceabuse”.mp73. “eatingdisorder”.mp74. anorexia.mp75. bulimia.mp76. “bingeeating”.mp77. “bodydysmorphicdisorder”.mp78. “posttraumaticstressdisorder”.mp79. “ticdisorders”.mp80. “qualityoflife”.mp81. self-esteem.mp82. loneliness.mp83. “lifeadjsatisfaction”.mp84. happiness.mp85. worthwhileness.mp86. anxiety.mp87. (46)and(47or48or49or50or51or52or53or54or55or56or57or58or59or

    60or61or62or63or64or65or66or67or68or69or70or71or72or73or74or75or76or77or78or79)and(80or81or82or83or84or85or86)

    88. limittohumans,peerreviewedarticles,agerange15-64.

  • 10

    References

    Argyle,E.Bolton,G.(2005)Artinthecommunityforpotentiallyvulnerablementalhealthgroups.HealthEducation,105(5),pp.340–354.

    Bell,C.Robins,S.(2007)EffectofArtProductiononNegativeMood:ARandomized,ControlledTrial.ArtTherapy:JournaloftheAmericanArtTherapyAssociation,24(2)pp.71-75.

    Castora-Binkley,M.Noelker,L.Prohaska,T.Satariano,W.(2010)ImpactofArtsParticipationonHealthOutcomesforOlderAdults.JournalofAging,Humanities,andtheArts,4(4),pp.352–367.

    Clift,S.(2012)Creativeartsasapublichealthresource:movingfrompractice-basedresearchtoevidence-basedpractice.PerspectivesinPublicHealth,132(3),pp.120-127.

    Daykin,N.Byrne,E.Soteriou,T.O’Connor,S.(2008)Review:TheImpactofArt,DesignandEnvironmentinMentalHealthcare:asystematicreviewoftheliterature.TheJournaloftheRoyalSocietyforthePromotionofHealth,128(2),pp.85–94.

    Foot,J.(2012)Whatmakesushealthy?Theassetapproachinpractice:evidence,action,evaluation.[Online]Availableat:www.assetbasedconsulting.co.uk/Publications.aspx(accessedMarch,2017).

    Hacking,S.Secker,J.Kent,L.Shenton,J.Spandler,H.(2006)Mentalhealthandartsparticipation:thestateoftheartinEngland.TheJournalofTheRoyalSocietyofthePromotionofHealth,126(3),121–127.

    Jindal-Snape,D.Morris,J.Kroll,T.Scott,R.etal.(2014)Theimpactofartattendanceandparticipationonhealthandwellbeing:Systematicliteraturereview.GlasgowCentreforPopulationHealth:Glasgow.

    Johansson,S.Konlaan,B.Bygren,L.(2001)Sustaininghabitsofattendingculturaleventsandmaintenanceofhealth:Alongitudinalstudy.HealthPromotionInternational,16(3),pp.229–234.

    Leckey,J.(2011)Thetherapeuticeffectivenessofcreativeactivitiesonmentalwell-being:asystematicreviewoftheliterature.JournalofPsychiatricandMentalHealthNursing,18(6),pp.501-509.

  • 11

    Malley,S.Datillo,J.Gast,D.(2002)Effectsofvisualartsinstructiononthementalhealthofadultswithmentalretardationandmentalillness.MentalRetardation,40(4),pp.278-96.

    Naylor,C.Das,P.Ross,S.Honeyman,M.Thompson,J.Gilburt,H.(2016)BringingtogetherphysicalandmentalhealthAnewfrontierforintegratedcare.[Online]Availableat:https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/Bringing-together-Kings-Fund-March-2016_1.pdf(accessedMarch2017).

    PublicHealthEngland(2016)Artsforhealthandwellbeing:Anevaluationframework.[Online]Availableat:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/496230/PHE_Arts_and_Health_Evaluation_FINAL.pdf(accessedMarch2017).

    Uttley,L.Scope,A.Stevenson,M.Rawdin,A.Taylor,E.Sutton,A.etal.(2015)Systematicreviewandeconomicmodellingoftheclinicaleffectivenessandcost-effectivenessofarttherapyamongpeoplewithnon-psychoticmentalhealthdisorders.HealthTechnologyAssess,19(18).

    White,M.(2004)‘Artsinmentalhealthforsocialinclusion:towardsaframeworkforprogrammeevaluation’,inCowling,J.(Ed.),ForArt’sSake:SocietyandtheArtsinthe21stCentury,InstituteofPublicPolicyResearch:London.

    4thApril2017