culture iceberg stereotypes - leadingagemn.org
TRANSCRIPT
© 2016 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to the Extension Store at 800-876-8636.
Building Your Cultural Awareness BY CATHERINE RASMUSSEN, EXTENSION PROFESSOR, LEADERSHIP & CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
What is Culture?
What is Cultural Awareness?
Understanding that culture is deep, pervasive, complex, patterned, and morally neutral
Understanding the role of culture in the formation of one’s own beliefs, values and patterns of behavior
Overcoming one’s own cultural prejudices about the right and wrong way to do things
A pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems of
external adaptation and internal integration that has worked well enough to be considered
valid and therefore to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and
feel in relation to those problems.
- Edgar Schein Schein, E. H.(2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
©2004 University of
Minnesota Tourism
FoodDress, Language
Manners / Behavior
First impressions&
Stereotypes10% above water
90% below water
Culture Iceberg
Attitudes & EmotionsTime, Work patterns,
Concept of responsibility, TrustSocial roles, Individual or group
BELIEFS VALUES MORALS ETHICS
“The world in which you
were born is just one model
of reality. Other cultures are
not failed attempts at being
you; they are unique
manifestations of the human
spirit.”
- Wade Davis,
Anthropologist
2010 Minnesota Age Pyramids
Nearly 90 percent of
leading executives from
sixty-eight countries
named cross-cultural
leadership as the top
management challenge
for the next century.
- Economist Intelligence Unit, “CEO
Briefing: Corporate Priorities for 2006 and Beyond” In The
Economist: Economic Intelligence
Milton Bennett’s Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity (DMIS)
Self Others
Denial Defense Minimization Acceptance Adaptation Integration
ETHNOCENTRIC STAGES ETHNORELATIVE STAGES
Experience of Difference
Possible Activities to Move Learners to the Next Stage
●Address learner anxieties in existing categories, but limit time. ●Demonstrate the experience of difference through films, food, slides, photographs, art, music, dance, etc.
●Develop a strong support group. ●Educate learners to recognize existing differences within their culture group. ●Create experiences unrelated to culture- learning to accomplish teamwork. ●Create opportunities for affective bonding.
●Use trained selected cultural informants in structure methods that indicate that they are different. ●Explore values and beliefs of their cultural systems. ●Contrast their culture with other cultures through demonstrated interaction.
●Develop complex in-depth values analysis for contrast cultures. ●Prepare learners for cultural adaptation through home stays, immersions, simulations, and role-plays requiring cross-cultural empathy.
●Prepare learners to understand their own development and to learn how to learn autonomously. ●Use cultural informants in unstructured formats.
●Use individuals at this stage as resources. ●Provide theoretical frameworks for constructing the multicultural identity. ●Develop a peer group of multicultural persons.
References: Bennett, Milton J., (1986). “A Developmental Approach to Training Intercultural Sensitivity," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Volume 10, Number 2, 1986, 179-196: Also refer to Bennett in Paige; R.M., ed. Cross Cultural Orientation: New Conceptualizations and Applications. Lanham, Maryland; University Press of America.
A Developmental Model of International Sensitivity
(DMIS)
LEVELS OF ETHNOCENTRICISM
I. Denial - No recognition of cultural difference because of own group’s isolation and lack of any experience with differences. Culturally deviant behavior attributed to deficiency in intelligence or personality.
II. Defense - Cultural difference .is recognized but regarded negatively. The greater the difference, the more
negative the evaluation. One’s own culture is viewed as the highest expression of culture. Members feel
superior to other cultures; other cultures and groups are viewed as inferior. Defense against other cultures and
groups takes several forms: destruction of other groups/genocide (warfare); forced isolation (e.g. segregation,
ghettoization, reservations); denigration; lack of recognition of other group’s accomplishment, history, etc.
Reversal - The tendency to see another culture as superior while denigrating one's own.
III. Minimization - Recognition and acceptance of visible cultural differences, (e.g. food, dress, music, eating
customs, dance forms), while holding that all human beings are essentially the same. Emphasis on the similarity
to people and the commonality of values. Tendency to define commonality in ethnocentric terms (i.e. everyone
is essentially like us) and to ignore profound cultural differences in values, attitudes, beliefs, behavior (i.e. people
are people where ever you go).
Physical Universalism - Emphasis the commonality of human beings in terms of physiological similarity. (i.e. We're all human beings. We have to sleep, eat, drink, communicate, laugh, cry...)
Transcendent Universalism - Emphasis on commonality of human beings as subordinate to a particular supernatural being, religion, or social-political philosophy.
LEVELS OF ETHNORELATIVISM
IV. Acceptance (attitudinal) - Recognition and appreciation of superficial and profound cultural differences.
Acceptance cultural differences as viable alternative ways to organize human existence. Difference is not viewed
negatively.
V. Adaptation (behavioral) - The development of multicultural skills that enable individuals to communicate and
interact effectively with culturally different others. Effective use of empathy. Ability to shift frames of reference.
Ability to both learn about and make oneself understood in another culture. Target language ability—
communicative competence.
VI. Integration - Defining one’s identity in bicultural or multicultural terms. Integrating more than one cultural
frame of reference into one's value and behavioral system. Multiculturalism. Being able to function as
“culture broker.” Accepting “marginal” cultural status.
References: Bennett, Milton J., (1986). “A Developmental Approach to Training Intercultural Sensitivity," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Volume 10, Number 2, 1986, 179-196: Also refer to Bennett in Paige; R.M., ed. Cross Cultural Orientation: New Conceptualizations and Applications. Lanham, Maryland; University Press of America.
The D.I.E. Model - A Tool to Build Your Cultural Awareness
When observing or interacting with members of other cultures, it is important to ask questions in a way that shows genuine interest in understanding the culture rather than conferring a feeling of evaluation or accusation based on your own cultural values and behaviors. The following process can be helpful to build your cultural understanding..
Describe
What do I see? What is happening?
What are the facts?
Be objective; stay neutral
Interpret
What are the possibilities to explain why the event happened?
(Note: the more possibilities, the better chance of finding the most accurate
interpretation)
Solicit interpretations with members of that culture
Avoid evaluation
Evaluate
What do I think and feel about what happened, based on the possible
interpretations?
Does my evaluation change with differing interpretations?
How does your my cultural background inform my evaluation?
Sources: Dr.Mai Moua, founder and president of Leadership Paradigms, Inc . and the Intercultural Training Center, International Student and Scholar Services, University of Minnesota. Adapted by Rasmussen, C. (2013), University of Minnesota Extension
POINTS TO REMEMBER...
Be aware of your own culture and its effect on your behavior and assumptions
Build your awareness, knowledge and interpretations with diverse people and cultures
Observe situations from a neutral point of view (or as neutral as one can be)
Understand your orientation towards difference and work towards greater acceptance
Using the D.I.E. process
can give you confidence
that your thinking
(positive as well as
negative) is well thought
out and based on
multiple perspectives.
Tips for Leading
CULTURALLY DIVERSE TEAMS
When the team is being formed, ask members to share in detail about their best team experiences,
and what made them special. Pay attention to what works for them in their particular cultures.
Be more explicit than usual in getting everyone to say how they can work together across the stages
of team performance.
Use visual tools to engage members as a complement to speaking a common language, like English.
The graphics will serve some of the same purpose translators do, illustrating another way to
understand the material being discussed.
Use low-risk get-acquainted processes that build relationships and mutual trust early in the life of the
team, especially with people who come from high-context cultures and expect to know a lot of
personal things about colleagues.
Conduct frequent check-ins, perhaps using a brief period at the beginning of each team exchange as
an opportunity for team members to catch up with each other. Keep it light and engaging.
Encourage all members to actively ask for clarification of anything that isn't clear to them-especially in
remote conferences. This is essential when there are language challenges.
Model open feedback by inviting other team members to give you specific feedback on your own
leadership approach and style.
Invest in a special face-to-face team building experience that will let people learn more about each
other as individuals. This will greatly improve any remote communications.
Instead of creating a "my way or your way" tension between persons of different cultures, encourage
everyone to co-invent a "third way" that works for the team.
Source: © 2003 The Grove Consultants International. Adapted by Rasmussen, C. (2013), University of Minnesota Extension