computational topology for reconstruction of

37
T. J. Peters, University of Connecticut Computer Science Mathematics www.cse.uconn.edu/~tpet ers with K. Abe, J. Bisceglio, A. C. Russell, T. Computational Topology for Reconstruction of Manifolds With Boundary (Potential Applications to Prosthetic Design)

Upload: quinto

Post on 08-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Computational Topology for Reconstruction of. Manifolds With Boundary. (Potential Applications to Prosthetic Design). T. J. Peters, University of Connecticut Computer Science Mathematics www.cse.uconn.edu/~tpeters with K. Abe, J. Bisceglio, A. C. Russell, T. Sakkalis, D. R. Ferguson. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

T. J. Peters, University of Connecticut

Computer ScienceMathematics

www.cse.uconn.edu/~tpeterswith

K. Abe, J. Bisceglio, A. C. Russell, T. Sakkalis, D. R.

Ferguson

Computational Topology for Reconstruction ofManifolds With Boundary

(Potential Applications to Prosthetic Design)

Page 2: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Problem in Approximation

• Input: Set of unorganized sample points

• Approximation of underlying manifold

• Want – Error bounds– Topological fidelity

Page 3: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Typical Point Cloud Data

Page 4: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Subproblem in Sampling

• Sampling density is important

• For error bounds and topology

Page 5: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Recent Overviews on Point Clouds • Notices AMS,11/04, Discretizing Manifolds via

Minimum Energy Points, ‘bagels with red seeds’– Energy as a global criterion for shape (minimum

separation of points, see examples later)– Leading to efficient numerical algorithms

• SIAM News: Point Clouds in Imaging, 9/04, report of symposium at Salt Lake City summarizing recent work of 4 primary speakers of ….

Page 6: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Recent Overviews on Point Clouds • F. Menoti (UMn), compare with Gromov-

Hausdorff metric, probabalistic

• D. Ringach (UCLA), neuroscience applications

• G. Carlsson (Stanford), algebraic topology for analysis in high dimensions for tractable algorithms

• D. Niyogi (UChi), pattern recognition

Page 7: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Seminal Paper

Surface reconstruction from unorganized points,

H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, et al., 26 (2), Siggraph, `92

Modified least squares method.

Initial claim of topological correctness.

Page 8: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Modified Claim

The output of our reconstruction method produced the correct topology in all the examples.

We are trying to develop formal guaranteeson the correctness of the reconstruction, given constraints on the sample and the original surface

Page 9: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 10: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Sampling Via Medial Axis

• Delauney Triangulation

• Use of Medial Axis to control sampling

• for every point x on F the distance from x to the nearest sampling point is at most 0.08 times the distance from x to MA(F)

Page 11: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Medial Axis

• Defined by H. Blum

• Biological Classification, skeleton of object

• Grassfire method

Page 12: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 13: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

X

Page 14: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 15: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 16: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Formal Definition: Medial Axis

The medial axis of F, MA(F), is the closure of the set of all points that have at least two distinct nearest points on S.

Page 17: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 18: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 19: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Sampling Via Medial Axis

• Nice: Adaptive

• for every point x on F the distance from x to the nearest sampling point is at most 0.08 times the distance from x to MA(F)

• Bad– Small change to surface can give large change to MA– Distance from surface to MA can be zero

Page 20: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Need for Positive Separation

• Differentiable surfaces,continuous 2nd derivatives

• Shift from MA to– Curvature (local)– Separation (global)

Page 21: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Topological Equivalence Criterion?

• Alternative from knot theory

• KnotPlot

• Homeomorphism not strong enough

Page 22: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Unknot

Page 23: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

BadApproximation

Why?

Curvature?

Separation?

Page 24: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Good Approximation

All Vertices on Curve

Respects Embedding

Via

Curvature (local)

Separation (global)

Page 25: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Boundary or Not

• Surface theory – no boundary

• Curve theory – OK for both boundary & no boundary

Page 26: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Related Work

• D. Manocha (UNC), MA algorithms, exact arithmetic

• T. Dey, (OhSU), reconstruction with MA

• J. Damon (UNC, Math), skeletal alternatives

• K. Abe, J. Bisceglio, D. R. Ferguson, T. J. Peters, A. C. Russell, T. Sakkalis, for no boundary ….

Page 27: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 28: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 29: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 30: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 31: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 32: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 33: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 34: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of
Page 35: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of

Computational Topology Generalization• D. Blackmore, sweeps, next week

• Different from H. Edelsbrunner emphasis on PL-approximations, some Morse theory.

• A. Zamorodian, Topology for Computing

• Computation Topology Workshop, Summer Topology Conference, July 14, ‘05, Denison.– Digital topology, domain theory– Generalizations, unifications?

Page 37: Computational Topology for Reconstruction of