chapter_1

43
UEMX2343 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

Upload: brandon-levine

Post on 26-Sep-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

er

TRANSCRIPT

  • UEMX2343REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN IIUEMX2343REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN II

  • Topic 1:Re-visit Basic Design & FundamentalsTopic 1:Re-visit Basic Design & Fundamentals

  • 1.1 Limit States Design Philosophy Ultimate Limit State (ULS)

    - require structure to withstand against collapse- ensure safety of the building occupants/structure itself- must consider possibility of buckling or overturning and

    accidental damage. Serviceability Limit State (SLS)

    - concern functioning of the structure or members, comfortof the people & appearance of the structure.

    - considered parameters are: deflection, cracking, durability,excessive vibration, fatigue, fire resistance & any otherspecial circumstances.

    Ultimate Limit State (ULS)- require structure to withstand against collapse- ensure safety of the building occupants/structure itself- must consider possibility of buckling or overturning and

    accidental damage. Serviceability Limit State (SLS)

    - concern functioning of the structure or members, comfortof the people & appearance of the structure.

    - considered parameters are: deflection, cracking, durability,excessive vibration, fatigue, fire resistance & any otherspecial circumstances.

    Ultimate Limit State (ULS)- require structure to withstand against collapse- ensure safety of the building occupants/structure itself- must consider possibility of buckling or overturning and

    accidental damage. Serviceability Limit State (SLS)

    - concern functioning of the structure or members, comfortof the people & appearance of the structure.

    - considered parameters are: deflection, cracking, durability,excessive vibration, fatigue, fire resistance & any otherspecial circumstances.

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads Characteristic material strengths: Characteristic material strengths:

    5% of test specimenstrengths fall belowthe characteristicstrength, fk

    sff mk 64.1strength,sticCharacteri

    5% of test specimenstrengths fall belowthe characteristicstrength, fk

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads Characteristic loads or actions: Characteristic loads or actions:

    5% of probability ofbeing exceededonce in a year

    Characteristic loads or actions:

    sF F mk 64.1action,sticCharacteri BS 648: Weights of BuildingMaterials EN1991-1-1: Actions onStructures Reynoldss ReinforcedConcrete Designers Handbook

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads Partial factor of safety for materials :

    EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2 states several types of partial factor ofsafety.

    m m

    kfsafetyoffactorpartial

    strengthsticcharacteristrengthDesign

    Partial factor of safety for materials :

    EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2 states several types of partial factor ofsafety.

    m

    kfsafetyoffactorpartial

    strengthsticcharacteristrengthDesign

    What is the partial safety factor forconcrete & steel bars under ULS?

    Partial factor of safety for materials :

    EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2 states several types of partial factor ofsafety.

    What is the partial safety factor forconcrete & steel bars under ULS?

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads According to EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2.4: According to EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2.4: According to EN 1992-1-1: cl. 2.4.2.4:

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads Partial factor of safety for actions :

    Refer to EN1990 (NA): Table NA.A1.2(B)

    ff actionsticcharacteriueaction valDesign

    Partial factor of safety for actions :

    Refer to EN1990 (NA): Table NA.A1.2(B) m

    kfsafetyoffactorpartial

    strengthsticcharacteristrengthDesign

    f actionsticcharacteriueaction valDesign

  • 1.2 Characteristic Materials Strengths & Loads What is Notional Load?

    - loads exist due to inaccuracies and imperfections(dimension & alignment) of the constructed structure.

    According to BS 8110-1: 1997: cl. 3.1.4.2:- Ultimate design notional load = 1.5% of characteristic

    dead load of the structure between mid-height of thestorey below and either mid-height of the storey above orthe roof surface.

    - The design ultimate wind load should not be taken as lessthan this value when considering load combinations.

    What is Notional Load?- loads exist due to inaccuracies and imperfections

    (dimension & alignment) of the constructed structure. According to BS 8110-1: 1997: cl. 3.1.4.2:

    - Ultimate design notional load = 1.5% of characteristicdead load of the structure between mid-height of thestorey below and either mid-height of the storey above orthe roof surface.

    - The design ultimate wind load should not be taken as lessthan this value when considering load combinations.

    What is Notional Load?- loads exist due to inaccuracies and imperfections

    (dimension & alignment) of the constructed structure. According to BS 8110-1: 1997: cl. 3.1.4.2:

    - Ultimate design notional load = 1.5% of characteristicdead load of the structure between mid-height of thestorey below and either mid-height of the storey above orthe roof surface.

    - The design ultimate wind load should not be taken as lessthan this value when considering load combinations.

  • 1.3 Load Combinations Ultimate limit state (ULS):

    - For persistent or transient design situations (fundamentalcombinations)

    - For accidental design situations

    - For seismic design situations

    Ultimate limit state (ULS):- For persistent or transient design situations (fundamental

    combinations)

    - For accidental design situations

    - For seismic design situations

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.10

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.11b

    Ultimate limit state (ULS):- For persistent or transient design situations (fundamental

    combinations)

    - For accidental design situations

    - For seismic design situations

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.11b

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.12b

  • 1.3 Load Combinations Value of factor for different types of buildings (EC 1990

    (NA): Table NA.A1.1)

  • 1.3 Load Combinations Serviceability limit state (SLS):

    - Characteristic combination

    - Frequent combination

    - Quasi-permanent combination

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.14b

    Serviceability limit state (SLS):- Characteristic combination

    - Frequent combination

    - Quasi-permanent combination

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.14b

    EN 1990:Eq. 6.15b

    Serviceability limit state (SLS):- Characteristic combination

    - Frequent combination

    - Quasi-permanent combinationEN 1990:Eq. 6.16b

  • 1.4 Frame Structure Analysis Load analysis for braced framed structure:

    max. = max. loading as per ULS load combination;min. = 1.35Gk

    Load analysis for braced framed structure:

    max. = max. loading as per ULS load combination;min. = 1.35Gk

    Load analysis for braced framed structure:

    max. = max. loading as per ULS load combination;min. = 1.35Gk

  • 1.4 Frame Structure Analysis The analysis involves:

    - Sketching of deflection profile of the structure- Defining the rotational stiffness for each member- Determining the distribution factor of the members at

    each joint- Analyzing the frame structure using moment distribution

    method- Sketching the BMD & SFD

    The analysis involves:- Sketching of deflection profile of the structure- Defining the rotational stiffness for each member- Determining the distribution factor of the members at

    each joint- Analyzing the frame structure using moment distribution

    method- Sketching the BMD & SFD

    Gosh! Wats hetalking about?

    Yawn! Rotationalstiffness? Moment

    distribution? I formattedmy brain after exam.

  • 1.4 Frame Structure Analysis Load analysis for unbraced framed structure:

    Max. = max. load as pereach ULS load combinationMin. = 1.35Gk(each load combinationmust consider those 3 loadarrangement)

    Max. = max. load as pereach ULS load combinationMin. = 1.35Gk(each load combinationmust consider those 3 loadarrangement)

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular Section Stress-strain diagram for a rectangular reinforced concrete

    member:

    For fck < 50 Mpa: = 1 (defining the effective strength);cc = 0.85 (ranging 0.8 ~ 1.0: account for long term effect)

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular SectionHorizontal Force Equilibrium:

    qbdfbdf

    qqqkqbdfAf

    bdfAfbdfAfbdfdkbf.bdf

    AfAfdkbf.

    ckck

    ssu

    scksllyk

    cksllykcksllykckuck

    ck

    sllyksllykuck

    )steelinforcenett()concreteinforceecompressiv(Therefore,

    1Eq.......'87.087.0567.0/considerThen,

    /'87.0/87.0/5670 withsidesbothDivide

    '87.087.05670

    ,

    ,,

    ,,

    qbdfbdf

    qqqkqbdfAf

    bdfAfbdfAfbdfdkbf.bdf

    AfAfdkbf.

    ckck

    ssu

    scksllyk

    cksllykcksllykckuck

    ck

    sllyksllykuck

    )steelinforcenett()concreteinforceecompressiv(Therefore,

    1Eq.......'87.087.0567.0/considerThen,

    /'87.0/87.0/5670 withsidesbothDivide

    '87.087.05670

    ,

    ,,

    ,,

    qbdfbdf

    qqqkqbdfAf

    bdfAfbdfAfbdfdkbf.bdf

    AfAfdkbf.

    ckck

    ssu

    scksllyk

    cksllykcksllykckuck

    ck

    sllyksllykuck

    )steelinforcenett()concreteinforceecompressiv(Therefore,

    1Eq.......'87.087.0567.0/considerThen,

    /'87.0/87.0/5670 withsidesbothDivide

    '87.087.05670

    ,

    ,,

    ,,

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular Sectionq is a combined reinforcing index. Its an unifying parameterbetween singly & doubly reinforced sections.where,q is a combined reinforcing index. Its an unifying parameterbetween singly & doubly reinforced sections.where,

    ck

    sllyks

    ck

    sllyks bdf

    Afq

    bdfAf

    q'

    ',,

    Moment Equilibrium:

    2Eq.......8705670501

    ,

    5670alsoor,5670 thatknow we1,Eq.From

    )'('87.0)2/(5670

    2

    ,

    d')(dA'f.).

    q.q(fbdM.

    qkqk.

    ddAfdkddkbf.M

    slyk,lckEd

    uu

    sllykuuckEd

    2Eq.......8705670501

    ,

    5670alsoor,5670 thatknow we1,Eq.From

    )'('87.0)2/(5670

    2

    ,

    d')(dA'f.).

    q.q(fbdM.

    qkqk.

    ddAfdkddkbf.M

    slyk,lckEd

    uu

    sllykuuckEd

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular SectionDrop the compression bar term and rewrite Eq. 2:

    3Eq.......5670501

    5670501

    2

    2

    ).

    q.q(fbdM

    ).

    q.q(fbdM

    ck

    Ed

    ckEd

    uss

    c

    Ed kqqkfbd

    Mq 567.0)'(87.0567.0

    211567.0 2

    3Eq.......5670501

    5670501

    2

    2

    ).

    q.q(fbdM

    ).

    q.q(fbdM

    ck

    Ed

    ckEd

    Rearrange Eq. 3 to quadratic equation of q.

    Besides, we also known that:

    uss

    c

    Ed kqqkfbd

    Mq 567.0)'(87.0567.0

    211567.0 2

    From Eq. 1

    ).

    q.q(fbdMK

    ck

    Ed

    56705012 0.167, singly reinf.> 0.167, doubly reinf.

    Rearrange Eq. 3 to quadratic equation of q.

    Besides, we also known that:

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular SectionFor ku,max = 0.45; = 0.8; qmax = 0.204; Kmax = 0.167For ku,min = 0.125; = 0.8; qmin = 0.057; Kmax = 0.054 A reinforced concrete member undergoes large plastic

    deformation prior to failure is said to be ductile. Good ductility is achieved by limiting quantity of tensioned

    steel to smaller value below = 0.013. BS8110 limits ku = 0.50 (79% of balance failure)AS3600 limits ku = 0.40 (67% of balance failure)MS EC2 limits ku = 0.45 (71% of balance failure) However, max. lever arm, z is limited to 0.95d. Hence,

    A reinforced concrete member undergoes large plasticdeformation prior to failure is said to be ductile.

    Good ductility is achieved by limiting quantity of tensionedsteel to smaller value below = 0.013.

    BS8110 limits ku = 0.50 (79% of balance failure)AS3600 limits ku = 0.40 (67% of balance failure)MS EC2 limits ku = 0.45 (71% of balance failure) However, max. lever arm, z is limited to 0.95d. Hence,

    A reinforced concrete member undergoes large plasticdeformation prior to failure is said to be ductile.

    Good ductility is achieved by limiting quantity of tensionedsteel to smaller value below = 0.013.

    BS8110 limits ku = 0.50 (79% of balance failure)AS3600 limits ku = 0.40 (67% of balance failure)MS EC2 limits ku = 0.45 (71% of balance failure) However, max. lever arm, z is limited to 0.95d. Hence,

    125.095.02/8.0

    95.0

    u

    u

    kddkd

    dz

    value for ku,min

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular Section

    0.054~0.167Kifsteelncompressionofor5670501

    054.0,057.0;8.0;125.0For167.0,204.0;8.0;45.0For

    0.057~0.204with567.0)'(87.0567.0

    211567.0

    2

    minmaxmin,

    maxmaxmax,

    2

    ).

    q.q(fbdMK

    KqkKqk

    qkqqkfbd

    Mq

    ck

    Ed

    u

    u

    uss

    c

    Ed

    0.054~0.167Kifsteelncompressionofor5670501

    054.0,057.0;8.0;125.0For167.0,204.0;8.0;45.0For

    0.057~0.204with567.0)'(87.0567.0

    211567.0

    2

    minmaxmin,

    maxmaxmax,

    2

    ).

    q.q(fbdMK

    KqkKqk

    qkqqkfbd

    Mq

    ck

    Ed

    u

    u

    uss

    c

    Ed

    ck

    sllyks

    ck

    sllyks bdf

    Afq

    bdfAf

    q'

    '; ,,

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Rectangular Section

    uscss

    lyk

    excesssc

    RdEdexcess

    sckRd

    ckEd

    kddAAA

    ddfMA

    -MMMqqfbdM

    .fbdMK

    43.0'/steel,tension

    yieldedsteelncompressiowith)'(87.0

    beamcapacityexcessbytaken87.0204.0;167.0Hence,requiredbarncompressio;1670/If

    1

    ,

    1

    max

    21

    2

    uscsslyk

    excesssc

    RdEdexcess

    sckRd

    ckEd

    kddAAA

    ddfMA

    -MMMqqfbdM

    .fbdMK

    43.0'/steel,tension

    yieldedsteelncompressiowith)'(87.0

    beamcapacityexcessbytaken87.0204.0;167.0Hence,requiredbarncompressio;1670/If

    1

    ,

    1

    max

    21

    2

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section Effects of hogging and sagging moment on flanged beam:

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section Effective width, beff according EC2: cl. 5.3.2.1

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section If depth of stress block in flange (kud hf): design thesection as per singly reinf. section.

    armlever87.0 fyMA Edsl

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section If depth of stress block out of flange (kud > hf): design thesection as per following:

    analyze the moment equilibrium of concrete compressionarea separately decomposed flanged beam into 2 parts.

    If depth of stress block out of flange (kud > hf): design thesection as per following:

    analyze the moment equilibrium of concrete compressionarea separately decomposed flanged beam into 2 parts.

    If depth of stress block out of flange (kud > hf): design thesection as per following:

    analyze the moment equilibrium of concrete compressionarea separately decomposed flanged beam into 2 parts.

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section

    yield As,flange result yield As,web result Flange:

    yield As,flange result yield As,web result

    armlever87.0

    armlever87.0)2/(5670

    ,

    ,

    fyM

    A

    Afyhdhbbf.Mflange

    flanges

    flangesffwckflange

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section

    yield As,flange result yield As,web result Web:

    yield As,flange result yield As,web result

    567.0211567.0 Kq

    MMM

    web

    flangeEdweb

    websflangessl AAA ,,

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section Shear reinforcement, deflection and durability parts refer

    to my RC I additional lecture note. For spacing requirement:

    - Min. spacing EC2: cl. 8.2- Max. spacing EC2: cl. 7.3.3 & Table 7.3N

    Shear reinforcement, deflection and durability parts referto my RC I additional lecture note.

    For spacing requirement:- Min. spacing EC2: cl. 8.2- Max. spacing EC2: cl. 7.3.3 & Table 7.3N

  • 1.5 Section Analysis Flanged Section

  • 1.6 Slabs 1-way spanning slab:

    - Ly/Lx > 2.0, and/or- The slab only supported by two beams at oppositelocation of each other .

    1-way spanning slab:- Ly/Lx > 2.0, and/or- The slab only supported by two beams at opposite

    location of each other .

    AdministratorLine

    AdministratorLine

  • 1.6 Slabs 2-ways spanning slab:

    - Any slab surrounded by four side beams andLy/Lx 2.0 .

    2-ways spanning slab:- Any slab surrounded by four side beams and

    Ly/Lx 2.0 .

  • 1.6 Slabs 1-way spanning slab Ultimate bending moment and shear forces in one-way

    spanning slabs:

    (Source: BS 8110: 1997: Part 1: Table 3.12)

  • 1.6 Slabs 1- way spanning slab Condition to use that table:

    a) In a one way slab, the area of each bay is not less than 30m2.

    b) Live load qkmust not exceed 1.25 times dead load.c) Live load qk must not exceed 5 kN/m2.d) Spans must be approximately equal.e) Loads must be uniformly distributed.

    Condition to use that table:a) In a one way slab, the area of each bay is not less than 30

    m2.b) Live load qkmust not exceed 1.25 times dead load.c) Live load qk must not exceed 5 kN/m2.d) Spans must be approximately equal.e) Loads must be uniformly distributed.

    Definition of panels and bay

  • 1.6 Slabs 2 ways spanning slab (simply) Simply supported slab spanning in two directions with four

    sides support:- maximum moments per unit width:

    - Bending moment coefficients () :

    Simply supported slab spanning in two directions with foursides support:- maximum moments per unit width:

    - Bending moment coefficients () :

    2xsxsx nlm 2

    xsysy nlm

    Simply supported slab spanning in two directions with foursides support:- maximum moments per unit width:

    - Bending moment coefficients () :

    (Source: BS 8110: 1997: Part 1: Table 3.13)

  • 1.6 Slabs - 2 ways spanning slab (restrained) Restrained slab spanning in two directions:

    2xsxsx nlm 2

    xsysy nlm

    n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qksx & sy = coefficientfrom BS8110-1: 1997:Table 3.14

  • 2xsxsx nlm

    2-ways restrained slab:Moment:

    2xsysy nlm

    n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qksx & sy = coefficient fromBS8110-1: 1997: Table 3.14n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qksx & sy = coefficient fromBS8110-1: 1997: Table 3.14

  • 1.6 Slabs - 2 ways spanning slab (restrained)Case 1: Four edges continuousCase 2: One short edgediscontinuousCase 3: One long edgediscontinuousCase 4: Two adjacent edgesdiscontinuousCase 5: Two short edgesdiscontinuousCase 6: Two long edgesdiscontinuousCase 7: Three edges discontinuous(one long edge discontinuous)Case 8: Three edges discontinuous(one short edge discontinuous)Case 9: Four edges discontinuous

    Case 1: Four edges continuousCase 2: One short edgediscontinuousCase 3: One long edgediscontinuousCase 4: Two adjacent edgesdiscontinuousCase 5: Two short edgesdiscontinuousCase 6: Two long edgesdiscontinuousCase 7: Three edges discontinuous(one long edge discontinuous)Case 8: Three edges discontinuous(one short edge discontinuous)Case 9: Four edges discontinuous

    Case 1: Four edges continuousCase 2: One short edgediscontinuousCase 3: One long edgediscontinuousCase 4: Two adjacent edgesdiscontinuousCase 5: Two short edgesdiscontinuousCase 6: Two long edgesdiscontinuousCase 7: Three edges discontinuous(one long edge discontinuous)Case 8: Three edges discontinuous(one short edge discontinuous)Case 9: Four edges discontinuous

    Fig: Different condition of the continuous slabs

  • 2-ways restrained slab:

    xvxsx nlV Shear at supports:

    n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qksx & sy = coefficient fromBS8110-1: 1997: Table 3.14

    xvxsx nlV xvysy nlV

    n = 1.35Gk + 1.5Qksx & sy = coefficient fromBS8110-1: 1997: Table 3.14

  • 1.6 Slabs - 2 ways spanning slab (restrained) Arrangement of the reinf. at the middle and edge strips are

    shown in figure below.

    In the edge strips, nominal reinf. is necessary

    Arrangement of the reinf. at the middle and edge strips areshown in figure below.

    In the edge strips, nominal reinf. is necessary

    Arrangement of the reinf. at the middle and edge strips areshown in figure below.

    In the edge strips, nominal reinf. is necessary

  • 1.6 Slabs - 2 ways spanning slab (restrained) Torsion reinf. must be provided at discontinuous corners:

    - consists of top & bottom mats in both directions of thespan.

    - other rules as illustrated in the figure below.

    Torsion reinf. must be provided at discontinuous corners:- consists of top & bottom mats in both directions of the

    span.- other rules as illustrated in the figure below.

    provide 75% ofmid spans Aslprovide 75% ofmid spans Asl provide half of

    the 75% of midspans Asl

  • 1.6 Slabs Design the longitudinal reinf., perform shear reinf.

    requirement checking, deflection and spacing checking as perrectangular section with considering b = 1m.

    Spacing requirements, as per in EC2:

    Design the longitudinal reinf., perform shear reinf.requirement checking, deflection and spacing checking as perrectangular section with considering b = 1m.

    Spacing requirements, as per in EC2:

  • 1.6 Slabs Simplified rules for curtailment of bars in solid slab spanning

    in one direction:

    Guided with EC2: cl. 9.3(1) & 9.3.1

    Simplified rules for curtailment of bars in solid slab spanningin one direction:

    Guided with EC2: cl. 9.3(1) & 9.3.1

    Simplified rules for curtailment of bars in solid slab spanningin one direction:

    Guided with EC2: cl. 9.3(1) & 9.3.1