caustic soda feasibility study
TRANSCRIPT
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 1/75
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
5150 Southwest 48 th
Way, Suite 610, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314
Phone: 954/792‐4549, Fax: 954/792‐2221, Toll Free Phone: 877/247 ‐8146, On the Web: www.SeaquestTesting.com
Asbestos Consulting Business ZA‐304, Radon Business RB2184 & Lead Based Paint Business FL‐16418 ‐1
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
FEASIBILITY STUDY, R ISK ASSESSMENT,
AND SAFETY PROCEDURES
FOR
CAUSTIC SODA OPERATIONS
PORT OF BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY, U NITED STATES PORT OF SOUTHAMPTON, U NITED K INGDOM
SEAQUEST PROJECT NUMBER : 6976
PREPARED FOR :
MS. JODY MILLER
LEAD, CREW SAFETY PROGRAMMARITIME SAFETY AND COMPLIANCE
R OYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
1050 CARIBBEAN WAY
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132
PREPARED BY:
SEAQUEST TESTING & CONSULTING
5150 SOUTHWEST 48TH WAY, SUITE 610FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314
AUGUST 15, 2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 2/75
ii
CERTIFICATION PAGE
FEASIBILITY STUDY, R ISK ASSESSMENT,
AND SAFETY PROCEDURES
FOR
CAUSTIC SODA OPERATIONS
PORT OF BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY, U NITED STATES
PORT OF SOUTHAMPTON, U NITED K INGDOM
SEAQUEST PROJECT NUMBER : 6976
PREPARED FOR :
MS. JODY MILLER
LEAD, CREW SAFETY PROGRAM
MARITIME SAFETY AND COMPLIANCE
R OYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
1050 CARIBBEAN WAY
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132
PREPARED BY:
SEAQUEST TESTING & CONSULTING
5150 SOUTHWEST 48TH
WAY, SUITE 610
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314
AUGUST 15, 2013
_________________________
TRACI-A NNE BOYLE, CIH, CSP
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 3/75
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 SCOPE – FEASIBILITY STUDY 1
1.2 SCOPE - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROTOCOLS 2
1.3 PORT AND VENDOR VISITS 2
2 ABOUT SODIUM HYDROXIDE (CAUSTIC SODA) 3
2.1 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 3
2.2 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE SUMMARY 3
2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SPILL CONSIDERATIONS 3
3 FEASIBILITY OF SUPPLY AND DELIVERY METHODS 5
3.1 CAPE LIBERTY 5
3.1.1 R AIL CAR 5
3.1.2 TANKER TRUCK TO VESSEL 5
3.1.3 BARGE DELIVERY TO VESSEL 14
3.1.4 TANKER TRUCK TO O NSITE STORAGE TANK 14
3.2 SOUTHAMPTON 15
3.2.1 R AIL CAR 15
3.2.2 TANKER TRUCK TO VESSEL 15
3.2.3 BARGE DELIVERY TO VESSEL 15
3.2.4
TANKER TRUCK TO O NSITE STORAGE TANK 20
4 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 21
4.1 GENERAL 21
4.2 VESSEL 21
4.3 PORT 21
5 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS & RESOURCES 23
5.1
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 23
5.2 INDUSTRY GUIDELINES 23
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 30
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 4/75
iv
TABLES
Table 1 - Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Cape Liberty ...................................................................6
Table 2 - Summary of Contacts, Bayonne .....................................................................................10
Table 3 - Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Southampton .................................................................16
Table 4 - Summary of Contacts, Southampton ..............................................................................18 Table 5 - Summary of Regulations, United States .........................................................................24
Table 6 - Summary of Regulations, United Kingdom ...................................................................28
APPENDICES
Appendix I - Provided Documentation
Appendix II – Hazardous Substance Fact Sheet – Sodium Hydroxide
Appendix III – Preliminary Risk Assessment
Appendix IV – Resource CD
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 5/75
1
1
INTRODUCTIONSeaQuest Testing & Consulting (“SeaQuest”) conducted a feasibility study, risk assessment and
developed preliminary health and safety protocols for introducing caustic soda into the emissionscrubbing process for vessels scheduled to call on the Ports of Bayonne, New Jersey, United
States and the Port of Southampton, United Kingdom.
The scope of work was developed based upon conversations with Ms. Jody Miller and Mr. Joe
Mujwit of Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd (RCCL) and documentation provided to SeaQuest
Senior Project Manager, Ms. Traci-Anne Boyle (see Appendix I). The project consists ofidentifying and evaluating the feasibility of vendors to deliver approximately 37,000 gallons of
50% sodium hydroxide to the ports every two (2) weeks. The feasibility study also examinedapplicable laws and evaluated the logistics of the material handling. Based upon the feasibility
of the project, a risk assessment was performed and preliminary health and safety protocols were
established for the safe handling of the material.
1.1 SCOPE – FEASIBILITY STUDY
SeaQuest reviewed regulations, contacted authorities and contacted vendors to evaluate whether
it is feasible to have 37,000 gallons of 50% sodium hydroxide delivered to the ports of Bayonneand Southampton every two (2) weeks. The feasibility study consisted of:
Regulatory Review - United States
Review of CFR 29, 33, 46 and 49, as well as related United States Coast Guard (USCG),
Department of Transportation (DOT) and Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)
policy documents
Review New Jersey Statutes
Review of City of Bayonne, NJ and other local community ordinances.
Review of Cape Liberty and the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey guidance
Discussion with the Captain of the Port (COTP) and the Officer in Charge of Marine Inspection
(OCMI)
Discussion with Cape Liberty Cruise Port and Ports of NY and NJ authorities
Discussion with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Vendor Evaluation - Port of Bayonne
Identify three (3) potential vendors to service the port of Bayonne
Confirm vendors are able to supply amount (37,000 gallons) and concentration (50%) needed.
Determine if the vendors are able and willing to comply with port operations, including all
necessary security authorizations needed to access the port
Evaluate the vendor/supplier understanding of the port operations and close proximity of other
operations being performed concurrently, as well as the guests and crew embarking and
debarking
Determine what method will the vendor use for transferring onboard
Determine how long the bunkering operations will take
Determine who will be involved in bunkering operations and if they have the necessary
certifications
Regulatory Review - United Kingdom
Review of relevant United Kingdom regulations (Maritime Coastguard Authority, Health and
Safety Executive)
Review of relevant European Parliament and of the Council (EC) regulations
Discussion with the Maritime Coastguard Authority and the Health & Safety Executive
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 6/75
2
Discussion with the Port of Southampton authorities (Harbor Master)
Vendor Evaluation - Port of Southampton
Identify three (3) potential vendors to service the Port of Southampton
Confirm vendors are able to supply amount (37,000 gallons) and concentration (50%) needed.
Determine if the vendors are able and willing to comply with port operations, including all
necessary security authorizations needed to access the port
Evaluate the vendor/supplier understanding of the port operations and close proximity of otheroperations being performed concurrently, as well as the guests and crew embarking and
debarking
Determine what method will the vendor use for transferring onboard
Determine how long the bunkering operations will take
Determine who will be involved in bunkering operations and if they have the necessary
certifications
1.2
SCOPE - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROTOCOLS
SeaQuest reviewed relevant environmental health and safety regulations and guidance to
evaluate applicable safety procedures and contingencies for spills on land, the ship and in thewater.
Environmental Health and Safety Protocols
Review of US federal requirements, including USCG, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and OSHA regulations pertaining to procedures for spills on land, in the water or on the ship.
Review of regulations from relevant United Kingdom authorities (Maritime Coastguard
Authority, Health and Safety Executive) and EC regulations
Review of NJ statutes
Review of City of Bayonne, NJ and other local community ordinances
Review of Cape Liberty and the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey guidance.
Discussion with COTP and OCMI (USCG Sector, NY)
Discussion with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Discussion with port authorities (e.g., Cape Liberty Cruise Port, Ports of NY and NJ, and Port of
Southampton)
Discussion with Maritime Coastguard Authority and Health & Safety Executive representatives
SeaQuest also developed preliminary health and safety protocols for the safe handling of the
material.
1.3 PORT AND VENDOR VISITS
Although not in the scope of work, SeaQuest conducted visits of both ports and met with potential vendors in Bayonne to discuss the project.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 7/75
3
2
ABOUT SODIUM HYDROXIDE (CAUSTIC SODA)Sodium hydroxide (commonly known as caustic soda) is used throughout the world for a wide
variety of purposes. The material is used in manufacturing, as a cleaning agent, in food
preparation, chemical pulping, in tissue digestion, and in waste water treatment plants for use in
the scrubbing process. In accordance with information provided by RCCL, the caustic soda will be added to the scrubbing water circulation in order to maintain the process pH and consequently
the sulfur removal efficiency of the air emissions scrubbers.
2.1 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
A copy of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Hazardous Substance FactSheet for sodium hydroxide is provided in Appendix II. Sodium hydroxide is an odorless white
solid that readily absorbs moisture from the air. The material reacts with strong acids (such as
hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and nitric acid) as well water to rapidly release heat. Partly dueto the strong reaction process, the material is typically transported as a liquid and it is readily
available in 50% solutions required in the specifications provided to SeaQuest. Sodium
hydroxide is not combustible and its vapor density is heavier than air. It has a health hazardrating of 3, a fire hazard rating of 0 and a reactivity hazard rating of 1.
In a 50% solution as required by the RCCL specifications, sodium hydroxide has a freezing
temperature of approximately 58F or 14C. Given this relatively high freezing temperature, the
material temperature will have to be regulated throughout the transportation, storage and use ofthe chemical.
2.2
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE SUMMARY
The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) 8-hour Time Weighted Average
(TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for sodium hydroxide is 2 mg/m3. The American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Value (TLV) and
National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limit
(REL) is also 2 mg/m3.
The material is a strong base and can cause severe burns if exposed to the skin or eyes or if it is
inhaled in the air. Contact with the skin and eyes should be prevented through diligent use of
personal protective equipment, including gloves, coveralls and a full facepiece splash shield. Inthe event of contact with the skin or eyes, immediate flushing with copious amounts of water is
necessary to reduce injury. Particulate respirators must be worn if airborne concentrations of
sodium hydroxide are expected to be near the PEL/TLV/REL.
2.3
ENVIRONMENTAL SPILL CONSIDERATIONS In the event of a spill of sodium hydroxide in solution, the material should be absorbed with sand
or earth and placed into sealed containers for proper disposal. In the event of a spill into a
contained water body (i.e. pool), the use of a dilute acid can be used to neutralize the solution.
However, a spill in the ocean would not likely result in a response. As an example, in 2004 a
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 8/75
4
tank failure resulted in a spill of over 460,000 gallons of 50% sodium hydroxide (an unknown
amount of which spilled into the Arthur Kill waterway), resulted in no on-water cleanup.1
1 http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/northeast/kinder/index.html. Accessed August 3, 2013.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 9/75
5
3
FEASIBILITY OF SUPPLY AND DELIVERY METHODSCaustic soda is commercially used throughout the world and is readily available. There appear
to be vendors at both Cape Liberty and Southampton that can supply the quantity (37,000
gallons), at the required interval (every 2 weeks) and at the correct mix (50%).
3.1 CAPE LIBERTY
The results of inquiries into vendors for Cape Liberty are provided in Table 1. Based upon the
research and interviews conducted (see Table 2), it appears that an onsite storage tank or barge
deliveries are feasible options at this port.
3.1.1 Rail Car
The IMTT Terminal that supplies caustic soda to many of the vendors is located less than three
(3) miles from Cape Liberty and has rail car access. However, according to information obtained
from Mr. Anthony Caputo, the Director of the Cape Liberty Cruise Port, and Mr. Jim Papernik ofIMTT, it would not be possible to install railroad tracks between the two (2) terminals due to the
land purchase and installation requirements. Therefore, it was determined that rail car delivery
is not an option at this port.
3.1.2 Tanker Truck to Vessel
Having tanker trucks delivered to the ship when it calls to Cape Liberty is problematic for the
required quantity:
The vessel is in port for 10-12 hours. However, delivering the required quantity (37,000
gallons) would take an average of 10 tankers each requiring approximately 2 hours to bunker their load. This would have bunkering operations continuing for approximately
20 hours.
According to Mr. Caputo, based upon current logistics during port calls, the maximumnumber of tanker trucks that could be accommodated would be 2 or 3.
Therefore, at the required quantity, delivery at this port by tanker truck is not feasible. If it is
determined that only 6,000 to 10,000 gallons were required during the port call, this option may
be feasible. However, the following should be considered:
Personnel bunkering the caustic soda would be wearing full personal protective
equipment, potentially within sight of boarding passengers. Due to the limited space portside, it is unlikely that sufficient separation between tanker
and pedestrians can be accomplished.
The tanker trucks will have to back into a containment structure (permanent ortemporary). If temporary, ground support will be needed to deploy for each delivery. If
a permanent containment is constructed, it will have to go through the Port Authority
approval process, which could take months to over a year to complete. A boom crane would be required to support the hose connection from the tanker to the
ship. The installation of a crane would have to be approved through the Port Authority
approval process, which could take months to over a year to complete.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 10/75
Table 1 ‐ Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Bayonne
Reference Information
Harborchem
Jonathan Myers
PO Box 630
Cranford, NJ 07016
p) 908/272
‐7070
Approximately 9 tank trucks, each needing roughly 2 hours to bunker, e
4,500 gallons. Barge delivery is also a possibility, although not practical
can be easily arranged with proper planning.
Met with Mr. Myers and President of Harborchem, Stephen Maybaum
in the
project.
Have
the
means
and
resources
to
supply
the
material
if
and willing to comply with port requirements.
At this screening level, Harborchem appears to be a suitable supplier fo
method of delivery with this vendor would be from tanker truck to Abo
(AST) at the port.
Seidler Chemical Company
Francis Penkethman
537 Raymond Boulevard
Newark, NJ 07105
p) 973/465‐1122, Ext 111
11 Full tank truck loads (~3,363 gallons per tanker) over a 3 day maximu
material from IMTT at the Port of Bayonne. Able and willing to comply
regulations.
At this screening level, Seidler Chemical Company appears to be a suita
soda. The
method
of
delivery
with
this
vendor
would
be
from
tanker
t
6
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 11/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 12/75
Table 1 ‐ Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Bayonne
Reference Information
Veckridge (Chemical Distributor)
Tom or Bob
p) 973/344‐1818
Can get the required quantity; in and out of the port a lot, so familiar w
not return repeated calls for followup information. No additional consi
recommended.
Whelpley Construction
Dave Whelpley
[email protected] p) 202‐314‐6456
Referred to Mr. Whelpley by Anthony Caputo, RCCL Director of Northea
Whelpley's firm is the vendor that is currently in the permitting process
Bayonne terminal.
Mr.
Whelpley
indicated
that
permitting
with
the
Po
onerous and can be very time consuming (months ‐ years). He indicate
were an option, perhaps they could be combined with the terminal imp
he has underway to shorten the timeline.
Kuehne Chemical
Ken Corolla
p) 732‐995‐1144
www.kuehnecompany.com
Referred to Mr. Carola from RCCLs current barge suppliers (Ray Baldwin
and Ralph Duca with Clean Waters NY) as well as Fran Penkethman with
Company for possible barge delivery. Spoke with Mr. Carola who indica
barge because Kuehne both manufactures caustic and owns its own cau
Mr. Carola indicates that Kuehne would need an advanced schedule for
estimate that
the
cost
per
37,000
gallon
delivery
to
be
approximately
$
include the cost of the product (current pricing is approximately $60,00
At this screening level, Kuehne Chemical appears to a suitable supplier
would deliver the material by barge to the ship.
8
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 13/75
Table 1 ‐ Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Bayonne
Reference Information
Ken's Marine Service, Inc.
Pat Garrison
Spill Supervisor
116‐20 East 22nd Street
Bayonne, NJ 07002
p) 201/339
‐0673
c) 201/800‐1409
Referred to Ken's Marine Service by Anthony Caputo, RCCL Director of
with Mr. Garrison on July 24th. Mr. Garrison provided a lot of informat
bunkering the material from a barge. Specifically, source flexible hosing
use a universal connection (camlock), do not have the connections ove
in 3 places using a boom crane, and have 3 shut offs in place. Ensure co
and on
the
ship.
Mr. Garrison also discussed the hazards of using dry powder. The most
explosion and rapid reaction producing heat. There will be blending iss
and agitators.
Mr. Garrison discussed that if a tank was installed at the port, he'd reco
contained within a heated building. The building would provide protec
failure, it would keep the pumps protected and the fittings protected (w
and most likely places for a failure to occur).
He is
willing
to
assist
with
the
preparation
of
the
needed
spill
preventio
suitable vendor to provide emergency response services in the event of
9
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 14/75
Table 2 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Bayonne
George Wojnar Very helpful contact for general questions; will point you in the right d
Port Authority NYNJ
p)973/578‐2157
Kim
Nguyen
Port
Authority
NYNJ
p) 973/578‐2155
1.
Submit the form TAA‐MWA Ph 1 01 (attached) , together with a
(Royal Caribbean) to the NJMT General Manager, Mr. Thomas F. Cly
work, together with some drawings and location plan. The form Ph 1
Tenant (Royal
Caribbean)
and
dated.
All
the
form,
cover
letter
and
dr
emailed to me at the above email address.
2.
I will forward the tenant’s email, cover letter and drawings to th
for their decision of whether this is a TAA or a MWA.
3.
Once it is determined to be a TAA, Royal Caribbean, the tenant,
Engineer of Records (A/EOR) who is licensed to practice in the state o
office will schedule a kick‐off meeting between the tenant, its Engin
Contractor. "
In a phone
conversation
with
Ms.
Nguyen,
she
could
not
estimate
on
would take. She said it depended upon the thoroughness of the app
additional forms and instructions.
Reference Information
RCCL needs to fill out and submit the proper paper work (TAA‐MWA)
will be designing the tanks to meet with her as well as other NYNJ Port
schedule.
For any tenants to propose any work on the Port Authority’s leased pr
Construction and Alteration Process (TCAP) requires the followings:
10
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 15/75
Table 2 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Bayonne
Reference Information
Jeffrey Sterling Provided Bob Gomez's Contact information
Supervisor
DEP Hazardous Waste Enforcement
Northern Region Field Office
p)973/656‐4498
Bob Gomez
New Jersey DEP
p)609/292‐3837
Gary Sobin
DEP Discharge Prevention
p)609/292‐2482
Any smaller containments at the site of the holding tanks will also be i
There are unloading area requirements.
Priit Pals NJAC 7:1E‐2.3 "All tank car or tank truck loading or unloading areas
DEP
Discharge
Prevention
unloading of hazardous substances shall be equipped with seconda
p)609/633‐1152 system, designed and built pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:1E‐2.6"
See Reference CD for more information.
Beth Reddy
p)954/767‐2140
Lt. Mike Metz Any further questions that may come up should be handled with Lt. M
p) 954/767‐2140 ext. 1005
Lt. Com. Keith Hanley
p)617‐223‐8541
No DEP regulations pertaining to the transport of sodium hydroxide; c
Program within the DEP
Any hazardous chemical in amounts greater than 20,000 gallons requi
Prevention Containment and Countermeasure and Discharge Cleanup
DEP Engineer with Discharge Prevention &
Permit Coordination
Plans for the holding tanks need to be submitted 180 days prior to ope
assigned a NJ DEP project manager as soon as wanted.
US Coast Guard Cruise Ship National Center
of Expertise
Because the sodium hydroxide on board the ship is not cargo and is a c
regulations that specifically pertain to having it on board.
11
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 16/75
Table 2 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Bayonne
Reference Information
Bayonne Police Department
http://www.bayonnenj.org/government/de
partment‐of ‐public‐safety/bayonne‐police‐
department/
Sargeant Jim
Ashe
201/858‐5642
Referred to Deputy Chief Keith Weaver of the Bayonne Fire Departme
New
York
City
Police
DepartmentPrecinct 1
p) 212/334‐0611
http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/precin
ct_maps/precinct_finder.shtml
Referred to
the
Port
Authority
Police
Department.
Port
Authority
Police
Department
http://www.panynj.gov/police/
p) 800/828‐7273
Sargaent D'Amato
Charles "Chuck" King
p) 973/578‐2158
Sargaent D'Amato does not believe this is a police department matter,
Mr. King indicated that the Port Authority Police Department will revie
submitted to the Port Authority as part of the TAA process (see Refere
Bayonne
Fire
Department
Deputy Chief Keith Weaver
201/858‐6009
Fire Official Christopher Czuba
201/858‐6024
Chief Weaver is also the city's Emergency Management contact. Refer
Christopher Czuba.
Mr. Czuba is working to identify if any additional requirements will app
The results of the inquiry will be forwarded upon receipt.
12
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 17/75
Table 2 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Bayonne
Reference Information
Customs and Border Protection
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/conta
cts/ports/nj/4601.xml
p) 201/443‐0408
Officer Murphy
Officer Murphy returned a voicemail left for Chief Heacock. He indicat
importing the caustic soda, Customs and Border Protection would not
Waterfront Commission
Police Headquarters
Carol Laurens
p) 212/742‐9280
Repeated phone messages in July were not returned.
National Transportation Safety Board
Office of Marine Safety
Bill Curtis
p) 202‐314‐6456
The NTSB has no authority over these matters as they are an investiga
incident, they may be called upon to investigate it.
13
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 18/75
14
3.1.3 Barge Delivery to Vessel
Barge delivery is an attractive option at Cape Liberty:
It will not interfere with the portside logistics.
It will be out of view of the passengers and most crew.
It can be done without investment of port infrastructure. No construction permits or regulatory requirements to implement.
Only regulatory requirements include safe handling procedures and spill response
responsibilities.
Potential challenges with barge delivery include:
Coordination between fuel barge and caustic barge.
Only one supplier was identified that is capable of providing the material by barge.
A vendor, Kuehne Chemical Company, has been identified that can supply the material by barge.
Contact information is provided in Table 1. Based upon the information gathered during thisinvestigation, barge delivery appears to be the most attractive option.
3.1.4 Tanker Truck to Onsite Storage Tank
Several vendors were identified that could provide the caustic soda to an onsite above groundstorage tank that could be installed at the port (see Table 1). The storage tank would be filled
over several days prior to the ship’s arrival. Then the material would be transferred to the ship
when it is in port.
Potential challenges with this scenario include:
The Port Authority would have to grant approval for the infrastructure needed. The
approval process could take several months or more (over a year):o The tanker trucks will have to back into a containment structure (permanent or
temporary). If temporary, ground support will be needed to deploy for each
delivery. If a permanent containment is constructed, it will have to go through the
Port Authority approval process.o A boom crane would be required to support the hose connection from the storage
tank to the ship.o
The storage tank(s) placement and design would have to be approved. The material will have to be maintained at a temperature sufficient to prevent freezing. A
redundant power supply may be needed.
The infrastructure would have to be maintained.
The temperature requirement will limit the distance that pipes can travel from the tanks tothe ship.
Personnel bunkering the caustic soda would be wearing full personal protective
equipment, potentially within sight of boarding passengers.
Continuous filling, emptying and storage of the caustic soda provides more opportunities
for spills or accidents.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 19/75
15
3.2 SOUTHAMPTON
The results of inquiries into vendors for Southampton are provided in Table 3. Based upon theresearch and interviews conducted (see Table 4), it appears that an onsite storage tank will be
required at this port, unless a supplier can be identified that can deliver the material by barge.
3.2.1
Rail CarThere is rail car availability at Southampton. However, no rail car lines meet up to the port side,
therefore, additional rail would be required. Based upon conversations with port authorities, this
is not a feasible option.
3.2.2 Tanker Truck to Vessel
Having tanker trucks delivered to the ship when it calls to Southampton is problematic for the
required quantity:
The vessel is in port for 10-12 hours. However, delivering the required quantity (37,000
gallons) would take an average of 10 tankers each requiring approximately 2 hours to
bunker their load. This would have bunkering operations continuing for approximately20 hours.
Therefore, at the required quantity, delivery at this port by tanker truck is not feasible. If it is
determined that only 6,000 to 10,000 gallons were required during the port call, this option may
be feasible. However, the following should be considered:
Personnel bunkering the caustic soda would be wearing full personal protective
equipment, potentially within sight of boarding passengers.
Due to the limited space portside, it is unlikely that sufficient separation between tanker
and pedestrians can be accomplished.
The tanker trucks will have to back into a containment structure (permanent ortemporary). If temporary, ground support will be needed to deploy for each delivery. If
a permanent containment is constructed, it will have to go through the Associated British
Ports approval process. A boom crane would be required to support the hose connection from the tanker to the
ship. The installation of a crane would have to be approved through the Associated
British Ports approval process.
3.2.3 Barge Delivery to Vessel
A supplier has not been identified that can deliver the material by barge in Southampton.
However, for the same reasons that this delivery method is an attractive option in Bayonne, it is
equally as attractive in Southampton. Therefore, it may be prudent for RCCL to conductadditional research into identifying a supplier.
Benefits include:
It will not interfere with the portside logistics.
It will be out of view of the passengers and most crew.
It can be done without investment of port infrastructure.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 20/75
Table 3 ‐ Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Southampton
Reference Information
Aquachem
Office K/Redwither Business Centre
Wrexham LL13 9XR
01978 664077
watertreatmentwaste.co.uk
Contact:
John Holt
Believed that delivery and transfer directly to the ship tanks by road tank
method. Originally stated they can supply the quantity, frequency and m
subsequently, they withdrew from consideration. No additional conside
recommended.
Chemtek
OrbisEnergy
Wilde Street
Lowestoft
Suffolk NR33 1XH
Tel: 0845 154 3330
Fax: 01502 539064
Email:
Believed that delivery and transfer directly to the ship tanks by road tank
method. Stated they can supply the quantity, frequency and mix require
contact upon asking for credentials. No additional consideration of this v
ReAgent Chemicals
0800 990 3258
Although initially they appeared interested, they cannot supply the quan
consideration of this vendor is recommended.
Altrans Liquids Ltd
Sheephouse Farm, Uley Road
Gloucestershire, FL11 5 AD
England
Ph: 01453 544 940
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.altransliquids.co.uk
Contact:
Anthony Millard
Believes feasible with onsite storage tank. Very helpful and interested in
supply the quantity, frequency and mix required. Security and port perm
for tanker access. Estimated costs at this time: £0.34 per litre (£222.71
At this screening level, Altrans Liquids appears to be a suitable supplier f
16
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 21/75
Table 3 ‐ Summary of Vendor Inquiries, Southampton
Reference Information
PBH Chemicals
Facility Services
323 Woodside Way
Springvale Industrial Estate
Cwmbran NP44 5BR
Paul
HughesPh: 07988 071 248
Email: [email protected]
Simon Hughes
Ph: 07540 625 135
Nick Hughes
Ph: 07734 440 268
Believes feasible with onsite storage tank. State they can supply the qua
required. Also able to supply NaOH in powder for mixing onsite. Securit
to be verified for tanker access.
At
this
screening
level,
PBH
Chemicals
appears
to
be
a
suitable
supplier
f
Whittaker Tankers Barge Company
Southampton Docks
Ph: 02380 339 989
Only able to deliver oil.
Mrs. Amy
Bowd
Sales Coordinator
http://www.tuffa.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 1889 567700
Fax: +44 (0) 1889 567600
Tuffa has
prebuilt,
preheated
and
bundled
tanks
suitable
and
available.
17
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 22/75
Table 4 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Southampton
Reference Information
Associated British Ports (ABP)
Ocean Gate Atlantic Way
Southampton SO14 3QN
Tel: 023 80488692
www.abports.co.uk
Forms and requirements for the use and transportation of sodium hydroxid
website at http://www.southamptonvts.co.uk/yachting_and_leisure/notice
In particular, No 24 of 2011 (Builk Liquids Transfer Request Form), No 19 of
in Harbour Area) and No 10 of 2011 (Marine Safety Management Systems)
included in the Resource CE.
ABP Port Health and Safety Advisor
Christopher Turner
Not particularly helpful in telephone or email discussions.
ABP Health and Safety Manager
David Fox
Emailed June 9th and several follow up telephone calls were not returned.
ABP Port Security Officer
Paul Woods
Met with Mr. Woods on June 28th in relation to potential for storage tank t
RCCL will have to approach ABP directly to discuss, but it is possible.
ABP Port Agent
Steve Heagren
Met with Mr. Heagren on June 8th. Very helpful with health, safety and sec
during the port visit and provided paperwork, procedures and security requ
ABP Perry
Dack
Cruise Passenger Services Manager
Dockside Handling
Met with
Mr.
Dack
on
June
28th.
He
referred
us
to
speak
with
Paul
Wood,
Environment Agency
Romsey Depot
Bill Scott
Environmental Enforcement Officer
Ph: 03708 506 506
www.environmentagency.gov.uk/conta
ctus/default.aspx
No concerns as long as the NaOH is not dumped at sea and any spillage con
managed.
Maritime and Coastguard Agency John
Simpson
http://www.dft.gov.uk/mca/
Ph: 02380 329 100 No concerns providing that port arrangements are adhered to.
18
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 23/75
Table 4 ‐ Summary of Contacts, Southampton
Reference Information
Beth Evans | Sales & Marketing
Manager | Associated British Ports
Ocean Gate | Atlantic Way |
Southampton | SO14 3QN
Tel: 023 8048 8844 | Mob:
07730047048
|
www.abports.co.uk
|
www.abparking.co.uk
Ms. Evans indicated that permission from ABP would be required to establis
the site for Royal Caribbean's use. She indicated that the first step would b
Manager,
Tom
Dynes
After
Mr.
Dynes
understanddetermines suitable space is available, they can provide additional informat
requirements and costs.
19
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 24/75
20
Only regulatory requirements include safe handling procedures and spill response
responsibilities.
Challenges with barge delivery include:
Coordination between fuel barge and caustic barge.
A supplier has not been identified in Southampton that is capable of providing the
material by barge.
3.2.4 Tanker Truck to Onsite Storage Tank
Several vendors were identified that could provide the caustic soda to an onsite above groundstorage tank that could be installed at the port (see Table 3). The storage tank would be filled
over several days prior to the ship’s arrival. Then the material would be transferred to the ship
when it is in port.
Potential challenges with this scenario include:
Associated British Ports would have to grant approval for the infrastructure needed. Theapproval process could take several months or more:
o The tanker trucks will have to back into a containment structure (permanent or
temporary). If temporary, ground support will be needed to deploy for each
delivery. If a permanent containment is constructed, it will have to go through the
Associated British Ports approval process.o A boom crane would be required to support the hose connection from the storage
tank to the ship.
o The storage tank(s) placement and design would have to be approved. The material will have to be maintained at a temperature sufficient to prevent freezing. A
redundant power supply may be needed.
The infrastructure would have to be maintained. The temperature requirement will limit the distance that pipes can travel from the tanks to
the ship.
Personnel bunkering the caustic soda would be wearing full personal protective
equipment, potentially within sight of boarding passengers. Continuous filling, emptying and storage of the caustic soda provides more opportunities
for spills or accidents.
Benefits include:
It is the only feasible option at this time since a supplier by barge was not identified.
Additional research into delivery by barge is recommended.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 25/75
21
4
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONSWhile there are numerous design considerations that are outside the scope of this investigation,
several were identified that are presented below.
4.1 GENERAL
Based upon information gathered during this investigation, all design considerations must take
into account the temperature at which the material will freeze, approximately 58°F (14°C). All
storage (storage tanks on board the ship or at the port), transfer equipment, and transportationequipment must be heated to prevent freezing throughout most of the year at both ports.
In accordance with the specifications prepared by Meyer Werft and supplied by RCCL:
Any part of tank or tank fittings which may come in to contact with caustic soda shouldnot contain the following metals or alloys: aluminum, magnesium, zinc, brass, and
tantalum. Caustic soda corrodes these metals and the reaction may generate flammable
hydrogen gas. Particularly reaction with aluminum is vigorous. Long term exposure to
caustic soda can deteriorate materials containing silica, e.g. glass. It is recommended tocheck supplier’s compatibility information regarding gaskets for manholes and flanged
tank fittings. Typically PTFE or EPDM should be used. Viton is not suitable as gasket or
sealing material.
Finally, any areas where the material is transferred must have immediate access to a safetyshower and eye wash station.
4.2
VESSEL
Given the various types of activities that occur while the ships are in port, the ideal location of
connections for bunkering the caustic soda will vary depending upon the type of transfer (either
by barge or aboveground storage tank). Connections that are at the extreme ends of the vesselmay require heated pipe runs over long distances if the above ground storage tanks are at
opposite ends of the vessel. Furthermore, regardless of the transfer method, connections will
have to be accessible on both the port and starboard side to enable connections to the shipregardless of how it is docked.
It is recommended that one (1) or more Chief Engineers review the plan layout for additional
considerations. For instance, the Chief Engineer aboard the Independence of the Seas noted that
in the event of a leak, the sodium hydroxide could destroy the integrity of equipment within the
hull, such as electricity cabling. Also, the Chief expressed concerns that wind direction may potentially direct fumes in the direction of passengers.
The design should include a plan for routine maintenance to inspect all tanks, piping, fittings and
connections associated with the handling, storage and use of the caustic soda.
4.3
PORT
In the event that aboveground storage tanks are used, the design and location of the tanks willhave to account for access for tanker trucks within a contained system. The footprint of the tanks
would be minimized if one (1) storage tank were used. However, given the density of the
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 26/75
22
material, it was recommended that four (4) smaller tanks would be preferable. Consideration to
housing the tanks within a building should be evaluated to determine if it would be preferableover an extended period of time (reduction on wear and tear of the tank, piping and fittings
exposed to the elements). The location of the tanks will have to be made with approval from the
port owners and managers.
Additionally, the design should account for passenger visibility, passenger proximity, as well as
a permanent boom crane system to support the hose during bunkering operations.
The design should include a plan for routine maintenance to inspect all tanks, piping, fittings and
connections associated with the handling, storage and use of the caustic soda.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 27/75
23
5
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS & RESOURCESAppendix IV contains a compact disk of various regulations, forms and resources that were
identified as part of the research for this project.
5.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
The handling, transportation and storage of caustic soda is regulated in both the United States
and the United Kingdom. A summary of regulatory requirements is provided in Table 5 (United
States) and Table 6 (United Kingdom).
If storage tanks are constructed at the ports to house the caustic soda, nearly all of the identified
regulations will apply. However, if the material is bunkered using a barge, only occupationalexposure regulations and spill response will apply to the process.
Occupational exposure precautions include appropriate training, use of protective clothing (full
face and body splash protection), airborne exposure limits, and proximity of emergency showers
and eye wash stations. A preliminary risk assessment was developed for the safe handling of the
caustic soda based upon United States regulations and is presented in Appendix III.
It is recommended that vendors be sourced and contracted to respond to a release on land or onthe ocean. An example of a suitable vendor is Ken’s Marine (see Table 1). The selected vendors
should be under contract to respond within 1 – 2 hours (if not sooner) of the report of a release.
5.2
INDUSTRY GUIDELINES
Because caustic soda is a chemical used throughout the world for a variety of commercial andindustrial applications, there are many good resources for the safe and proper use of this
material. One of the most comprehensive compilations of best practices is published by the
Chlorine Institute (www.cl2.com) and includes:
a) Pamphlet 80 Recommended Practices for Handling Sodium Hydroxide Solution and
Potassium Hydroxide Solution (Caustic) Barges
b) Pamphlet 94 Sodium Hydroxide Solution and Potassium Hydroxide Solution (Caustic)
Storage Equipment and Piping Systems
c) Pamphlet 87 Recommended Practices for Handling Sodium Hydroxide Solution and
Potassium Hydroxide Solution (Caustic) Tank Cars d) Pamphlet 65 Personal Protective Equipment for Chlor - Alkali Chemicals
A copy of these publications is included on the resource disk provided in Appendix IV.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 28/75
Table 5 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United States
General PPE Requirements for Caustic Soda
Initial Line Break: Head, Neck, Face, Eyes, Hands, Body and Feet
Material Sampling: Face, Eyes and Hands
Loading (employee is away from loading connection): Head, Face, Eyes
Open Dome‐ No Product Flow: Eyes
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.262 (oo)
Handling Caustic Soda
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.262 (ll)
Shut ‐off Valves for Open Tanks & Vats
Valves shall conform to the ASME Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, u
Reference Information
Means shall be provided for handling and emptying caustic soda and
prevent workers from coming in contact with the caustic.
1910.5 (c)(1) states that if a standard is specifically applicable to a con
operation, or process, it shall prevail over any different general standa
applicable; therefore, 29 CFR 1910.262 (oo) prevails over more genera
counteract it.
Emergency shut off valves for holding tanks must be located at a dista
coming in contact with the caustic soda in the event of a splash, etc.
Proper PPE and other appropriate equipment is required to be provide
the Sodium Hydroxide.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.132 &
The Chlorine Institute's Pamphlet 65
Protective Equipment, including personal protective equipment for ey
protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and bar
and maintained for those working with and around the Sodium Hydrox
All PPE
equipment
should
be
chemical
resistant
in
the
following
condit
with an ambient temperature no greater than 120 degrees Fahrenheit
Sodium Hydroxide is colorless and odorless and causes severe irritatio
human tissue. It can rapidly cause damage to the eyes and skin as well
Extreme caution must be exercised when working with this chemical.
24
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 29/75
Table 5 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United States
Reference Information
OSHA 29 1910.20
OSHA 29 1910.1200
Hazard Communication
EPA 40 CFR 302.4
EPA 40 CFR 300
When spills in excess of 156 gallons occur, RCCL is to follow these guid
This section
covers
the
clean
up
operations
at
uncontrolled
hazmat
wa
operations and a guidelines for a written health and safety program.
~The written health and safety program must include but i
structure, a comprehensive work plan, site specific safety a
health training program, medical surveillance program and
for safety and health involving hazardous materials.
Ensures that the hazards of caustic soda is evaluated, and that informa
transmitted to employers and the employees of RCCL that will be wor
material.
Relevant hazard
communication
should
be
added
to
RCCL's
existing
ha
documents.
Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response
It is required to either hire a company with properly trained personne
appropriate employees in 40 hour HAZWOPER, in the case that there i
Hazardous Substances & Reportable
Quantities
The reportable quantity for Sodium Hydroxide is 1,000 pounds where
contains approximately 6.4 pounds per US Gallon.
Spills in excess of approximately 156 gallons are will require reporting
Center and the US Coast Guard.
National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan:
Subpart E ‐ Hazardous Substance Response
The organizational structure and procedures for preparing for and resp
releases of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants.
25
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 30/75
Table 5 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United States
Reference Information
46 CFR Part 147 Subpart A
Hazardous Ships' Stores
33 CFR Part 153
In the event of a spill, RCCL should refer to this section for manageme
49 CFR 171.15
(Reportable quantity for NaOH: 1,000 lbs. or 156.25 gallons)
49 CFR 171.16
49 CFR 172.101
Sodium Hydroxide:
Hazard Class
8
Identification Number UN1824
Immediate notice of certain hazardous
materials incidents
In the event of a spill of the reportable quantity or more, the National
notified within 12 hours.
Control of Pollution by Oil and Hazardous
Substances, Discharge Removal
The purpose of this part is to prescribe regulations concerning notifica
discharge of oil or hazardous substances as required by the Federal W
amended (FWPCA); the procedures for the removal of a discharge of o
imposed or reimbursed for the removal of a discharge of oil or hazard
FWPCA.
The Sodium Hydroxide must be labeled with the technical/proper ship
supplier's name and address, hazard classification (8 corrosive materia
proper use, first aid instructions and the stowage and segregation guid
The holding
tanks
at
the
port
and
onboard
the
ship
must
be
appropria
accordance with this regulation.
Detailed hazardous materials incident
reports
Each person involved in the transport of the Sodium Hydroxide must s
Incident Report to the US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safet
an incident.
Purpose and use of hazardous materials
table
The table designates the materials listed therein as hazardous for the
table identifies the hazard class and identification number.
26
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 31/75
Table 5 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United States
Reference Information
NJAC 7:1E‐1.8
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
It is important to review this section in designing site plans.
NJAC 7:1‐2
NJAC 7:26E This chapter constitutes the minimum technical requirements to inves
contamination at any site.
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation
Any person conducting remediation shall comply with this chapter a
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection website.
For the purposes of designing and implementing a DPCC and a DCR pla
an environmentally sensitive area.
This New Jersey Statute should be reviewed by all personnel involved
tanks at the port as well as onboard the ship.
Prevention and Control of Discharges at
Major Facilities
This chapter covers the discharge of hazardous substances; including S
of New Jersey. These rules set forth guidelines and procedures to be f
event of a hazardous substance release. They also set forth certain reg
operations, and maintenance requirements for owners and operators
hazardous substances.
NJAC 7:1E
NJ Department of Environmental Protection
General Provisions
The rules that are applicable to the owners or operators of major facil
processing or using hazardous materials. This New Jersey statute sho
part of
the
holding
tank
design
process,
if
implemented.
27
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 32/75
Table 6 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United Kingdom
eference Information
angerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC)
angerous Preparations Directive (1999/45/EEC)
These Directives have been implemented in the UK as the Chemicals (Hazar
Supply Regulations 2009 (CHIP[2][3]). The CHIP Regulations will be fully rep
(http://www.hse.gov.uk/ghs/backgrnd.htm).
ew European legislation derived from EU GHS ‐
lassification,
Labelling
and
Packaging
of
ubstances and Mixtures 2009 (CLP Regulations)
(EC) No 1272/2008 (2009 ‐2015 7yr trans period) CLP effect on companies
If you are a supplier of chemicals, you must classify, label and package your
accordance with the CLP Regulation. Your obligations depend upon your ro
may have one or more of these roles: Manufacturers of substances or mixt
mixtures, Producer of specific articles, Downstream user (including formu
(including retailer).
If you place a hazardous substance on the market, you must notify ECHA of
one month of placing the substance on the market for the first time.
For importers, the one month is counted from the day when a substance, o
physically introduced
in
the
customs
territory
of
the
EU.
(http://echa.europ
companies)
Guidance link‐ http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13562/clp_introd
egistration, Evaluation, Authorisation and
estriction of Chemicals 2007 (Reach)
Reach – if a supplier is importing caustic from outside EU they will need to
manufacturing within EU and all “ingredients” are purchased from within E
REACH. However, if an ingredient is purchased from outside EU then they w
quantities >100 tonne should be registered before June 2013.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/reach/resources/basics.pdf
ontrol of Substances Hazardous to Health
COSHH) 2002
Works alongside REACH regulations. Requires substances to have MSDS she
and use. Must provide information, instruction and training, and health su
28
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 33/75
Table 6 ‐ Summary of Regulations, United Kingdom
eference Information
uropean Agreement concerning the
nternational Carriage of Dangerous Goods by
oad.
ccord European Relatif au Transport
nternational
des
Marchandises
Dangereuses
par
oute 1967
ADR Agreement)
nited Nations Economic Commission for
urope (UN/ECE)
ADR is an agreement between states in EU. ADR applicable as from 1 Janu
ADR link ‐http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/adr/a
http://www.hse.gov.uk/cdg/regs.htm
arriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of
ransportable Pressure Equipment Regulations
009 CDG 2009
ealth and Safety Executive SI 2009 No 1348
Came into force on 1 July 2009. They replace the 2007 regulations. Implem
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/1348/contents/made
lassification, Labelling and Packaging of
ubstances and Mixtures 2009 (CLP)
The CHIP Regulations will be fully repealed in 2015 and replaced with CLP 2
(http://www.hse.gov.uk/ghs/backgrnd.htm)
29
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 34/75
30
6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSIt is feasible to source 37,000 gallons of caustic soda every two (2) weeks in the both the Port of
Bayonne and the Port of Southampton. The preferred delivery method to the vessel appears to
be by barge, although only one supplier in Bayonne and no suppliers in Southampton were
identified. It is recommended that RCCL use its purchasing power to negotiate with globalmanufacturers (such as Dow Chemical and Brenntag Global) to possibly identify more barge
delivery options.
Alternatively (and perhaps required), aboveground storage tanks appear to be options at both
ports. However, significant investment in time (approval process) and infrastructure (installationof the storage tanks, housing structure, piping and boom crane) would be required. If RCCL
decides that installation of storage tanks is the desired solution, it is recommended that RCCLformerly retain engineers to initiate the design process and engage the port authorities (PANYNJ
and ABP) and regulatory agencies as soon as possible to meet a target date of November 2014.
Depending upon the projected industry use, if RCCL decides to proceed with installation of
storage tanks, sale of the caustic soda to other vessels may be considered to possibly off-set theimplementation cost. Mr. Dave Whelpley of Whelpley Construction (see Table 1) will be a good
resource at the Port of Bayonne as he is currently working on the terminal improvements there.
Given the time constraints while in port, tanker truck delivery directly to the ship will only be
feasible if limited quantities (less than 10,000 gallons) are required. To be implemented,containment and boom infrastructure (to support the hose) would have to be installed. Rail car
delivery does not appear to be an option at either port.
There are excellent industry resources available to guide engineers in the design and
implementation of use of caustic soda that are provided with this report. SeaQuest recommends
that professionals engaged in the process be given access to this report and the accompanyingresource disk.
With the appropriate risk management tools (training, use of personal protective equipment and
routine monitoring of the entire system for evidence of wear) risk to people and the environment
is considered minimal in the proposed closed loop caustic soda scrubbing process.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 35/75
APPENDIX I
PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 36/75
Person in charge: Kostilew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
1.1.1.1.1 List of Included Drawings 2 List of
BGN Sheet Description No. Drawing No.
774 M 1100 General Description 1) 752 V 1000 Service air774 M 1200 Material and Piping Standards 2) 753 V 1000 Control air
774 M 1300 Monitoring and Alarms via the “IAMCS” 3) 721 V 1000 Technical wat
774 M 1001 NaOH 50 % Bunkering, transfer and feed System 4) 724 M 2000 Boiler Wash a
774 M 1002 NaOH 50 % Bunkering, symboltable and details 5) 711 M 2004 LT Circle
MWS 0.7--.07
MWS 0.7--.01
2.1.1.1.1 List of Alterations
BGN Sheet Description Kind of Alteration
774 M 1100 General Description See marked in grey.
774 M 1200 Pipe System specification Material test 3.2
774 M 1300 Monitoring and Alarms via the “IAMCS” See marked in grey.
774 M 1001NaOH 50 % Bunkering, transfer and feed
SystemUpdates signed with arrows
774 M 1002NaOH 50 % Bunkering, symboltable and
detailsUpdates signed with arrows
Name Date
2.1.1.1.2 Armatures
Labels
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 37/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 38/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 39/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 40/75
Person in charge: Kostilew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
6. CALCULATIONS
General data
The pumps and heat exchangers for propulsion are designed according to information of supplier for
tropical conditions. The following operating data are based on:
Value
Ambient temperatures: + 45 °C
Ambient air temperature: min. - 7 °C, 36 h in harbour
max. + 35 °C
Seawater
Sea water: min. ± 0 °C
max. + 32 °C
Seawater temperature inlet
Design temperature + 32 °C
Seawater temperature outlet + 48 °C
Tank heating System
The layout of heating surfaces is based on the following conditions:
Outside air temperature: - 7°C
Sea water temperature: + 0°C
Engine room temperature: +20°C
Performance: heating up within 24 h
Tank Name Heat requirement
NaOH Overflow TK 12S 5,1 kW
NaOH Store TK 12S-1 51,5 kW
NaOH Store TK 12S-2 57,0 kW
NaOH Store TK 12S-3 47,4 kW
Sum. Store TK’s 161 kW
h
m
t
QV
³*
*16,1
*
Medium Heat [kW] V [m³/h] P [bar] T in [°C] T out [°C]
LT fresh w. (hot) 180 22,0 4,0 39,0 32,0
Cool fresh w. (cold) 180 19,3 4,0 20,0 28,0
7. SAFE RETURN TO PORT
With regard to ‘Safe Return to Port’ regul
There are no special regulations because
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 41/75
Person in charge: Kostilew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 42/75
Person in charge: Kostilew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 43/75
Person in charge: Kostilew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 44/75
Person in charge: Kostlew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 45/75
Person in charge: Kostlew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 46/75
Person in charge: Kostlew Owner:
Phone: +49(0)4961 81-4772 RCL
E-mail [email protected] System: Operating fluids
Date: 18.04.2013
Plotdate: 23.04.2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 47/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 48/75
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 49/75
hW tilfil
Environmental Technologies
7 lkali Feed System
7 1 General
Installation Planning Instructions
7
lkali Feed System
Alkali
is
automatically added to the scrubbing water circulation when operating
in
closed loop mode to
maintain the process
pH
and consequently the SOx removal efficiency. Typically 50% NaOH (Sodium Hy
droxide), also known as Caustic Soda or Lye solution
is
used as alkali.
Main components
in
alkali system are alkali feed modules, alkali transfer pump, alkali dosing pump, alkali
topping-up pump and alkali storage tank. The alkali feed module consists
o
two chemical dosing pumps.
One pump is normally
in
operati
on
and the other is stand-by.
The scrubbing water pH is regulated by the amount of alkali added to the circulation . The pH contro l uses
information of the
pH
of the scrubbing water
as
input. The main control
is
automatically adjusted based on
the measured
pH o
scrubbing water.
Caustic soda bunkering areas, tanks and sounding pipes, anq feed module should be provided with
warning signs to ensure that all crew members are aware of the hazards involved
in
general and
in
particular
when any maintenance or repairs are made. The warning sign to be used is standard corrosive 8 sign,
with text Sodium Hydroxide Solution and UN 1824 nearby. Additionally texts NaOH Solution and
Caustic Soda Solution can be included as well.
Figure 7 1 Corros ive 8 sign
Safety showers (with shower and eye wash) should be arranged for relevant alkali handling areas, such as
bunker stations, alkali feed module area and bleed-off treatment units. If the safety shower is located out
doors, it must be insulated and heat traced in order to prevent freezing . The requirements for the safety
shower are defined e.g.
in
standard
SFS
5411.
The safety showers should be clearly marked with dedicated signs.
Figure 7.2 Safety shower and eye wash signs
Following personal protective equipment must be worn when handling alkali :
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber- a4
14 March 2013
7-1
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 50/75
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali Feed System
ifl@ iiii
Environmental Technologies I
Impervious overalls
Protective clothing
Chemical boots
Safety helmet
Safety goggles or face shield
All locations where alkal i is handled are to be provided with good ventilation. See Appendix 1 for more
in
formation of NaOH.
7.2 Consumption
Alkali consumption depends on the concentration of the solution, engine operating power, engine specific
fuel oil consumption and fuel sulphur content. The alkali supply is automatically controlled based on these
parameters.
Indication of the alkali consumption can be seen in the figure below. It also indicates the relations of the
affecting parameters.
Figure 7.3 Alkali consumption per operating power, when using
50
caustic soda
A l
ka
li
demand
per eng i
ne
power
80
- 3.5 5fu e l
- • 3,
05fue
l I
600 - -
2,5 5
fue
l
700
E
500 - • 1,5 5 fue l
s::
5
-
GJ • • • • • • 2P 5
ftJe l -L
Q. no • +·----+----- _ . or __
E
ll
]
<(
30 0
2tl0
10
0
0
. - ·
5000 10000
15000 20000
2
5000
30000
Operating power kW)
35000
As a rule of thumb the alkali consumption can be estimated
to
be 5 liters/MWh per
fuelS .
.
.
40000
7.3 Storage
7-2
Onboard storage capacity is dictated by the following parameters: vessel autonomy, alkali consumption
and vessels operation profile and area.
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber - a4
14 March 2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 51/75
·
ik/t9Jt11M
Environmental Technologies
I
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali Feed System
Figure 7 4 Alkali consumption per consumed fuel, when using 50 caustic soda
2000
lSOO
_ 1 6
E
- 1400
a
1200
§
1000
t:
·0
...
800
600
Alkali demand per fuel consumption
5 S f u ~
- 3,0% 5 fue l
- - 2,5%5 fue l
• • • • • •
2,0 5
fue l
1,5 5 fue l
········
.
.
-
-·-
.
-
.
400 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ - - ~
2
1
0
0 2000 4 00 6000
00
10000
12000
14000 16000
1
000
20
000
Fuel consumption ton)
Required storage tank capacity can be calculated e.g. by comparing it
to
the fuel consumption. If ship 's
annual fuel consumption is 10 000 ton and average fuel sulphur content 2.5% , the corresponding alkali
consumption is 630 m3 per year. If alkali is bunkered every two weeks the required amount is 24 m3 On
top of this some margin should be added to take into account the increasing effect of possible higher sulphur
content or different operating profile. When using a hybrid scrubber the capacity
of
the storage tank is de
pendent on the time when closed loop or hybrid mode is used.
For vessels that are operating in regular routes or in specific areas, the storage capacity could be equal to
the fuel bunkering interval. To minimize the transportation costs and ease the bunkering arrangement, tank
capacity should be adequate to receive the total volume from one delivery truck. The ideal storage capacity
should be at least 1.5 times the volume
of
the truck.
When alkali tank location and volume are outlined, high density of 50% caustic soda solution and the
margin against overfilling {15-20%) are to be considered. Recommended cleaning interval for storage tank
is 5 years. A single tank configuration can
be
used, if operation and regulation compliance with low sulphur
fuel is a possible and feasible alternative during the above mentioned periods. Due to the relatively high
density of caustic soda a low center of gravity for storages may be favorable regarding vessel stability.
There is generally no limitation to tank geometry. Tank bottom should preferably be sloped towards drain
pipe. Tank for 50% NaOH should be dimensioned for specific density
of
1.52 tfm3, including hydrostatic
static pressure to air vent head above the bulkhead deck. Tank should be externally or internally stiffened.
Integrity
of
storage tank and related air vents should be hydrostatically tested prior the tank coating. Air
vents need to be arranged from the highest points designed according to rules of applicable classification
society.
General shipbuilding steels can be used for tank construction. In each case when tank construction involves
structural members special consideration by classification society is required. The temperature limits should
be respected as above 49°C temperatures carbon steel is susceptible to stress corrosion cracking, also
known as caustic embrittlement . If higher tank temperatures are expected, special measures including
weld stress relieving and use
of
alternative materials should be considered case by case.
NOTE
Any part of tank or tank fittings which may come in to contact with caustic soda should not
contain the following metals or alloys: aluminum, magnesium, zinc, brass, and tantalum. Caustic
soda corrodes these metals and the reaction may generate flammable hydrogen gas. Particularly
reaction with aluminum is vigorous. Long term exposure to caustic soda can deteriorate mater
ials containing sil ica e.g. glass. It is recommended to check supplier's compatibil ity information
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber-
a4
14 March 2013
7-3
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 52/75
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali
Feed
System
k@ij §i Environmental Technologies
regarding gaskets for manholes and flanged tank fittings. Typically PTFE or EPDM should be
used. Viton is not suitable as gasket or sealing material.
7 4
ank
coating
7 4
Internal tank coating is recommended to avoid corrosion that may occur particularly on tank upper parts.
Major suppliers have epoxy resins that are suitable for this purpose. Suppliers recommendation
is
to be
followed concerning intended use, surface preparation and application.
In
the following some example coatings
are
presented. Other products with similar properties can also be
used.
Table 7.1
Example
products
for
tank coating from
Jotun
Coating
for
buffer
and alkali
tanks
Product Marathon 2:1
Description
High solids ,
two-pack
epoxy coating reinforced with glass flakes. Steel structures subject to
aggressive exposure, both atmospheric and mechanical. For aggressive chemical exposure.
Temperature Max 70 °C
Specific gravity
Film thicknesses
400 J Jm
Colours Limited selection
Pre-treatment Sa2
V2
ISO 8501-1)
Surfaces
All surfaces should be clean and free from contamination. The surface should be assessed
and treated in accordance with ISO 8504. The temperature
of
the substrate should be minimum
10°C and at least 3°C above the dew point
of
the air, temperature and relative humidity
measured in the vicinity
of
the substrate. The coating should not be exposed
to
oil, chemicals
or
mechanical stress until cured.
Drying times Dust dry after 5.5 hours. Touch dry after 12 hours. Fully cured after 7 days.
Thinner
Jotun Thinner No.1?
Primer Marathon 2:1, Pink
Finish Marathon 2:
1,
Grey
Table
7.2
Example products for tank coating from Teknos
Product
Description
Temperature
Specific grafity
Film thicknesses
Colours
Pre-treatment
Surfaces
Drying times
Thinner
Primer
Finish
Coating
for
buffer and
alkali
tanks
Teknos
lnerta
280
Used as coat
in
epoxy systems inside kerosene and oil tanks. Withstands aliphatic hydrocar-
bons, alkaline solutions and acids.
Withstands +70°C in immersion
1.5 kg/1
500
J Jm
Red , green
or
white
Sa2
Y2
ISO 8501-1)
The surface must be dry and least 4 weeks old. The relative humidity
of
the concrete should
not exceed 80
.
The surface temperature should remain at least 3°C above the dew point.
The temperature of the ambient air, surface
or
paint should not fall below +10°C.
Dust dry after 3 hours. Touch dry after 4 hours. Fully cured after 7 days.
Teknosolv 6560
Teknos lner ta 280
Teknos lnerta 280
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber- a4
14 March 2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 53/75
lf/N Irilfti Environmental Technologies
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali Feed System
Table 7 3 Example products for tank
co
ati
ng
from Tikkurila
Coating for buf fer and alkali tanks
Product
Tikkurila TEMALINE BL TES
Description Two component, solvent free epoxy coating. Suitable to be used as a heavy duty coati
ng
on
steel and concrete surfaces exposed to chemical and mechanical stress in immersion. Good
resistance to acids, alkali and salts
in
immersi
on
. Suitable for coating of lead-free tanks.
Temperature Withstands + 150°C dry heat and +60°C in immersion
Specific gravity 1.4 kg /1 mixed)
Film thicknesses
500
iJm
Colours Red and green
Pre-treatment Sa2 Y ISO 8501-
1)
Surfaces
All surfaces must
be
dry.
The
temperature of the ambient air, surface or paint should not fall
below+1ooc during application and drying. Relative humidity should not exceed 80 . The
surface temperature of the steel should remain at least soc above the dew point.
Thinner
Thinner 10S1 or acetone
Pr imer TEMALINE BL
Drying times
Dust dry after 8 hours. Touch dry after 12 hours. Fully cured after 7 days.
Finish TEMALINE BL
Coating for buffer tank
Product
SIGMASHIELD 460 (LT)
Description
Two component high solids glass flake reinforced polyamine adduct tar free epoxy coating.
Temperature
Specific gravity 1.5 kg /1
Film thicknesses Min 400
iJm
Colours
Black - gloss (light colours on request)
Pre-treatment
Sa2 Y ISO 8501-1)
Surfaces
All
surfaces should be clean and
free
from contamination.
The
surface should
be
assessed
and treated
in
accordance with
ISO
8504. The temperature of the substrate should be between
-1ooc up to 15°C during application and curing and at least soc above the dew point and free
from ice and any contaminations. Curing to hardness takes longer
in
lower temperatures and
complete resistance will be reached when temperature increases. Maximum relative humidity
during application and curing is 85 .
Thinner
Sigma Th inner 91-92
Drying times
Overcoating interval min
16
hours.
Touch
dry after S hours. Fully cured after 7 days.
Primer
SigmaCover 280 min 50
iJm
)
Finish
7 5 Storage tank heating
50
caustic soda is solidifying
at temperatures
below 12°C and
therefore the
tank
should
preferably be
located so
that it
shares common boundaries
with
engine room as far as possible. If the tank temperature
is expected
to
drop below 16°C
additional
heating
should
be
provided. The recommend ed storage
temper-
ature is
between 25 and
35°C.
Corrosive properties
of
caustic
soda
are
aggravated at temperatures above
49
°C {when
carbon
steel is used) and
thus
caustic soda
storage should
not have common
structures
with
e.g. heated fuel o il service and settling tanks. Also other heat sources that may locally increase temperature
inside the tank
to exceed the
before
mentioned
value (e.g.
exhaust gas
or
steam
pipes)
should
be
isolated
from
tank structures.
Storage tank heating requirement can be determined by calculating heat transfer through each tank
boundary.
The same
heat
transfer coeffic
ients
through
the external tank
walls
that are
typically used
for
heavy fuel oil are applicable. In some cases external tank insulation
could
be considered
to
reduce heat
losses .
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber - a4
14 March
2013
7-5
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 54/75
Installation Planning Instructions
7
Alkali Feed System
RMi ijld
Environmental Technologies I
If heat losses from the tank
are
remarkable, heating with water circulation in carbon steel coils can be used.
To avoid corrosion o heating coils external surface, inlet water temperature should remain below 49°C.
Fo r example, returning LT cooling water can be utilized for heating and heating coils can be connected in
parallel to the central cooler. The central cooler pressure drop or a dedicated circulation pump can be used
for induced circulation depending
on
the pressure drop in the tank heating system. Coils should be installed
to an approximate height
o
300 mm from tank bottom and located so that thermal agitat ion pattern will
occur.
Heating coils should be positioned to provide heating particularly
in
suction pipe area. Heating coil dimen
sioning is based on the differential temperature (t-.t) between the lower storage temperature (25°
C}
and the
arithmetic mean temperature o incoming outgoing circulating water. Mean heat transfer coefficient from
water coils to caustic soda can be estimated to 60 W/(m2 x C}, if turbulent flow conditions can be achieved.
An alternative heating method is to provide a separate caustic soda circulation through an external heat
exchanger. Thus the heating media can be low pressure steam or high temp heat recovery water. In these
cases the appropriate heat exchanger material should be selected, for example nickel. If heat losses are
moderate, also external electric heating can be used. Heating elements are adhesive and attached directly
to the tank wall under the insulation. Also in these cases the specified heating elements should not exceed
maximum surface temperature.
7 6 Storage tank fitting and instruments
7-6
When anywhere
in
the alkal i system (bunkering , transfer, feed} the lines are located below the alkali storage
tank level, the storage tank should be equipped with a quick closing valve. The alkali feed module shut-off
valve should be installed before alkali feed modules 15N04 and possible other alkali pumps.
The primary suction should be located approximately 100 mm from storage tank bottom. Tanks should
also be provided with low suction for complete draining prior to maintenance. Diameter is according to in
stallation specific system diagram. Each connection below the maximum surface level should be provided
with safety quick closing valves.
Alkali tank filling line should be led below the minimum service level and should be provided with vacuum
breaker hole at the upper end where anti siphon effect may occur. Piping should
be
sloped downwards
without pockets. It is recommendation to use seal paste for pipe fillers. Filling pipe material recommendation
is AISI 316L or black steel DIN 2448. Transport trucks are provided with several different connection types
depending
on
supplier and country. Adapters may be required.
After bunkering the transport truck's delivery hose and the filling line are to be cleaned with compressed
air and flushed with water. Also the tanks in the truck are to be cleaned with water. Therefore compressed
air and water connections should be located near to bunkering stations.
Caustic soda storage tank should be provided with the following alarms:
Temperature high (set point 45°C, if provided with heating)
Temperature low (set point 20°C, if relevant)
Level low (e.g. 30
)
Level high (e.g. 85 )
Caustic soda storage tank should be provided with the following indications:
Local level gauge (hydrostatic type with sensor isolating valve). Sight glasses are not recommended.
Local temperature gauge (gauge with stainless steel pocket)
Each caustic soda storage tank should be provided with a standard 600 mm x 400 mm manhole.
Instead o sounding pipe
an
approved type local hydrostatic level indicator can be used, note that devices
need to
be
calibrated for caustic soda density. Relevant classification society 's rules concerning sounding
requirements should be verified.
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber - a4
14 March 2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 55/75
i fUiifii
Environmental Technologies I
Figure 7.5 Caustic soda storage tank fittings
T
I
H
HOLE
Installation Planning
Instructions
7. lkali Feed System
Alkali storage tank air and overflow pipe
are
led in similar way as normal air and overflow pipes
e
.g. above
bulkhead deck and overboard).
To
prevent spraying of alkali , the air pipe end should be protected by a
plate or similar means.
Figure 7.6 Example of spray protector plate for alkali storage tank air and overflow pipe .
7 7
lkali feed module
F
ROM
NaOH
STORAGE T NK
Alkali feed module consists
of
two pumps.
In
normal operating conditions one pump
is in
operati
on
and
the other pump in stand-by. The complete module includes also valves , sensors and filters.
To
prevent any
splashes in case of leakages the module is equipped with doors and drip tray. To minimize the suction line
length the preferred location of the alkali feed module
is
near the storage tank. Module connection A
vertical location to
be
max 1000 mm above bottom of alkali storage tank.
Number: One module per scrubber
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber-
a4
14
March 2013
7-7
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 56/75
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali Feed System
Type:
Motor:
Frame:
Piping:
ry
weight:
Weight in operation:
Width :
Depth:
Height:
Chemical dosing
Approx 0.55 kW
Steel
AISI316L or equivalent
200 kg
300 kg
900mm
700 mm
1950 mm
f¥iiQib
Environmental Technologies
I
Alkali feed module shutdown
is
connected to the emergency stop. The module is equipped with drip tray.
The drip tray drainage should be arranged with one of the following alternatives:
Alternative 1 automatic quick closing valve. Drip trays are to be provided at the lowest point with
such a leak detector that automatically activates the NaOH storage tank quick closing valve. Drip
trays are to be of adequate capacity to receive such leak quanti ty which may escape from the system
prior to closing of the quick closing valve including quantity
in
the supply pipe. Leak detection and
quick closing system are to be of fail to safe type. Such drip trays are without drainage.
Alternative 2 automatic drainage to safe tank. Vertical conditions permitting drain pipes from the
drip trays are conducted freely flowing back to the NaOH storage tank or any other suitable tank .
Such drain pipes should be of adequate size and provided with heating where necessary to avoid
stiffening of the caustic soda. A sensor
in
the drip tray triggers
an
alarm
in
case of leakage.
Alternative 3 alarm. A sensor
in
the drip tray triggers an alarm
in
case of leakage.
7.8 p control of the bleed off buffer tank
To
keep the
pH in
the bleed-off buffer tank above 4pH there will be alkali feed to bleed-off recirculation
line. The main components
in
the bleed-off buffer tank pH control are alkali dosing pump and
pH
sensor.
The
pH
will be measured from the recirculation line and the alkali is only dosed if the pH
is
below the set
value.
7.9 Alkali dosing pump
The alkali dosing pump is used for pumping the alkali from the alkali storage tank to bleed-off buffer tank
when pH drop below the set value. Selected pump type is self-priming.
Capacity : 100 1/h
Motor: 0.25 kW
Weight: 14
kg
7.10 Alkali topping up pump
The alkali topping-up pump is used to transfer alkali from storage tanks to small intermediate tank near
aeration tank and to small built-in tanks of bleed-off treatment units. The bleed-off treatment unit uses the
alkali for adjusting the
pH
to correct level as required by the other treatment chemicals
in
the treatment
process. Selected pump type
is
self-priming. In the flow rate has been taken into account that the delivery
head of topping-up pump
is
max 11.5 meters and suction height max 1.5 meters.
Capacity: 3 m h
Motor: 1.1 kW
Weight: 37
kg
7-8 Meyer Werft
697
Scrubber-
a4
14
March 2013
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 57/75
IMJti fii Environmental Technologies
I
7 11 Alkali transfer pump
Installation Planning Instructions
7. Alkali Feed System
The alkali transfer pump is used to empty the alkali storage tank or one compartment to the other or to the
bunker station e.g. in case of tank service or inspection. Selected pump type is self-priming. In the flow
rate has been taken into account that the delivery head of alkali transfer pump is max 16 meters and suction
height max 1.
5 meters.
Capacity: 10 m3/h
Motor: 3.7 kW
Weight: 84 kg
7 12 Alkali specification
Wartsila scrubber system typically uses 50 NaOH solution as neutralizing agent in the process. The
customer/operator should acquire the chemical according to the following specification .
50 NaOH
solution specific tion
(typical
for
marine scrubber):
SODIUM HYDROXIDE (NaOH ) 50 SOLUTION -TECHNICAL QUALITY
TECHNICAL NAME: SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION 50 (WATER SOLUTION)
CHEMICAL FORMULA: NaOH
(aq
)
CAS N:o
EINECS N:o
ADDITIONAL TRADE
NAME(S):
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
1310-73-2
215-185-5
CAUSTIC SODA 50 ,LYE 50
SODIUM HYDROXIDE, Na- 45 . .. 52 -weight
OH
CHLORIDE (CI) < 0.1 -weight as NaCI
7 13 Drawings
DBAC471142-
DBAC471141-
DBAC4587
43 -
DBAC4587 43 -
DBAC458676 -
DBAC458676 -
DBAC458669 -
DBAC458669 -
Alkali feed module .. ... ..... ..... ................ ........ ..... .............. ... ... ............... ....... ..... ... .. 7 1
0
Alkali feed module .................... ........... ............ .................. ....
..
...
..
..
...
...
..
......
..
.
..
...
7 11
Alkali transfer pump ............ .................. ........... ..... ....
..
...... ............. .......... ........ 7
-12
Alkali transfer pump manual ..
...
.
..
...
...
.... .... ........
..
.
..
.... .
...
.........
...
...... ...... ....
...
..... ..
7 13
Alkali dosing pump .... ... ..... ... .... ............. .. .... ... .... ......... ....... .... ...... ... ............... .. ... .
7 18
Alkali dosing pump manual .
.. ..
.. .
...
.. ........
...
................... ..........
... ..
... .....
.. ..
........ .
..
.
7 19
Alkali topping-up pump ............ .... .. ..... ......... ...... .. ... ... .... ...... .. .... ...... ..... ............. ..
7 60
Alkali topping-up pump manual ...... ...... .. ... ........ .... ..... .. .. ..... ... .
..
...... ... .. .......... .. ....
7
61
Meyer Werft 697 - Scrubber - a4
14 March 2013
7-9
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 58/75
APPENDIX II
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE FACT SHEET – SODIUM HYDROXIDE
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 59/75
I I Right
to
Know
.... Hazardous Substance Fact
Sheet
common Name: SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Synonyms: Caustic Soda; Lye; Sodium Hydrate
Chemical Name: Sodium Hydroxide
Date: May 2 1
Revision : April2010
Descript ion
and Use
Sodium Hydroxide is an
odorless, white solid that absorbs
moisture from the air. It
is
used to make textiles, cellophane,
and pulp and paper,
in
soaps and detergents, and for etching
and electroplating.
Reasons
for
Citation
Sodium Hydroxide is on the Right to Know Hazardous
Substance List because it
is
cited by OSHA, ACGIH , DOT,
NIOSH, NFPA and EPA.
This chemical
is on
the Special Health Hazard Substance
List.
SEE G LOSSARY
ON
PAGE
5
FIRST
AID
Eye Contact
Quickly brush off excess chemical from the face .
Immediately flush with large amounts of water for at least 30
minutes, lifting upper and lower lids. Remove contact
lenses, if worn , while flushing. Seek medical attention
immediately.
Skin Contact
Quickly remove contaminated clothing. Immediately blot or
brush off excess chemical and wash gently with large
amounts water for at least 30 minutes. Seek medical
attention immediately.
Inhalation
Remove the person from exposure.
Begin rescue breathing using universal precautions) if
breathing has stopped and CPR if heart action has stopped .
~ r a n s f e r
promptly to a medical facility .
Medical observation
is
recommended for 24 to 48 hours after
overexposure, as pulmonary edema may be delayed .
EMERGENCY NUMBERS
Poison Control 1-800-222-1222
CHEMTREC: 1-800-424-9300
NJDEP Hotl ine: 1-877-927-6337
National Response Center: 1-800-424-8802
CAS Number:
RTK Substance Number:
DOT Number:
1310-73-2
1706
UN
1823 solid)
UN
1824 solution)
EMERGENCY RESPONDERS » SEE
LAST
PAGE
Hazard
Summary
Hazard R a t i n ~ ~
NJDOH
NFPA
HEALTH
-
3
FLAMMABILITY
-
0
REACTIVITY
-
1
CORROSIVE
DO
NOT USE WATER
Hazard Rat ng Key: 0-mrmma/; 1=s/rght; 2=moderate; 3=senous;
4=severe
Sodium Hydroxide can affect you when inhaled and by
passing through the skin .
Sodium Hydroxide is
a HIGHLY CORROSIVE CHEMICAL
and contact can severely irritate and burn the skin and eyes
with possible eye damage.
Contact can irritate the mouth, nose and throat.
Inhaling
Sodium Hydroxide
can irritate the lungs. Higher
exposures may cause a build-up of fluid
in
the lungs
pulmonary edema), a medical emergency.
Repeated exposure can lead to permanent lung damage.
Sodium Hydroxide in
contact with water or moisture may
generate enough heat to ignite combustibles.
Workplace Exposure Limits
OSHA: The legal airborne permissible exposure limit PEL) is
2 mg/m
3
averaged over
an
8-hour workshift.
NIOSH: The recommended airborne exposure limit REL) is
2 mg/m
3
which should not be exceeded at any time.
ACGIH : The threshold limit value TLV)
is
2 mg/m
3
which
should not be exceeded at any time.
The above exposure limits are for air levels only. When skin
contact also occurs, you may be overexposed, even though
air levels are less than the limits listed above.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 60/75
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
etermining
Your Exposure
Read the product manufacturer s Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) and the label to determine product
ingredients and important safety and health information
about the product mixture.
For each individual hazardous ingredient, read the New
Jersey Department of Health Hazardous Substance Fact
Sheet, available on the RTK website
(www.nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb) or
in
your facility s RTK
Central File or Hazard Communication Standard file .
~ o u have a right to this information under the New Jersey
Worker and Community Right to Know Act and the Public
Employees Occupational Safety and Health (PEOSH) Act
if you are a public worker
in
New Jersey, and under the
federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) if you
are a private worker.
The New Jersey Right to Know Act requires most
employers to label chemicals
in
the workplace and
requires public employers to provide their employees with
information concerning chemical hazards and controls .
The federal OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29
CFR 1910.1200) and the PEOSH Hazard Communication
Standard (N.J.A.C. 2 :100-7) require employers to provide
similar information and training to their employees.
This Fact Sheet
is
a summary of available information
regarding the health hazards that may result from exposure.
Duration of exposure, concentration of the substance and other
factors will affect your susceptibility to any of the potential
effects described below.
Health Hazard Information
cute Health Effects
The following acute (short-term) health effects may occur
immediately or shortly after exposure to Sodium Hydroxide
Contact can severely irritate and burn the skin and eyes with
possible permanent eye damage (corneal opacities), causing
blindness.
Contact can irritate the mouth , nose and throat.
Inhaling Sodium Hydroxide can irritate the lungs causing
coughing and/or shortness of breath. Higher exposures may
cause a build-up of fluid
in
the lungs (pulmonary edema), a
medical emergency, with severe shortness of breath.
Chronic Health Effects
The following chronic (long-term) health effects can occur at
some time after exposure to Sodium Hydroxide and can last
for months or years:
ancer Hazard
According to the information presently available to the New
Jersey Department of Health, Sodium Hydroxide has not
been tested for its ability to cause cancer
in
animals.
Page 2 of
Reproductive Hazard
There is no evidence that Sodium Hydroxide affects
reproduction. This
is
based
on
test results presently
available to the NJDOH from published studies .
Other Effects
Sodium Hydroxide can irritate the lungs. Repeated
exposure may cause bronchitis to develop with coughing,
phlegm , and/or shortness of breath.
Repeated exposure can lead to permanent lung damage.
Med
ical
Medical Testing
For frequent or potentially high exposure (half the PEL or
greater), the following are recommended before beginning
work and at regular times after that:
Lung function tests
If symptoms develop or overexposure is suspected, the
following are recommended :
Consider chest x-ray after acute overexposure
Exam of the eyes and vision
Any evaluation should include a careful history of past and
present symptoms with
an
exam. Medical tests that look for
damage already done are not a substitute for controlling
exposure.
Request copies of your medical testing. You have a legal right
to this information under the OSHA Access to Employee
Exposure and Medical Records Standard (29 CFR 1910.1 020).
Mixed Exposures
Smoking can cause heart disease , lung cancer,
emphysema, and other respiratory problems . It may worsen
respiratory conditions caused by chemical exposure. Even if
you have smoked for a long time , stopping now will reduce
your risk of developing health problems.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 61/75
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Workplace Controls and Practices
Very toxic chemicals, or those that are reproductive hazards or
sensitizers, require expert advice on control measures
if
a less
toxic chemical cannot be substituted. Control measures
include: (1) enclosing chemical processes for severely
irritating and corrosive chemicals, (2) using local exhaust
ventilation for chemicals that may be harmful with a single
exposure, and (3) using general ventilation to control
exposures to skin and eye irritants. For further information
on
workplace controls, consult the NIOSH document on Control
Banding at www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ctrlbanding/.
The following work practices are also recommended :
' Label process containers.
' Provide employees with hazard information and training.
' Monitor airborne chemical concentrations.
'
Use engineering controls if concentrations exceed
recommended exposure levels.
' Provide eye wash fountains and emergency showers.
' Wash or shower if skin comes in contact with a hazardous
material.
' Always wash at the end
of
the workshift.
'
Change into clean clothing if clothing becomes
contaminated.
' Do not take contaminated clothing home.
' Get special training to wash contaminated clothing .
'Do
not eat, smoke, or drink
in
areas where chemicals are
being handled, processed or stored .
' Wash hands carefully before eating, smoking , drinking,
applying cosmetics or using the toilet.
In addition, the following may
be
useful or required:
' Use a vacuum to reduce dust during clean-up.
DO
NOT
DRY SWEEP.
Personal Protective
Equipment
The OSHA Personal Protective Equipment Standard (29 CFR
191
0.132) requires employers to determine the appropriate
personal protective equipment for each hazard and to train
employees on how and when to use protective equipment.
The following recommendations are only guidelines and may
not apply to every situation.
Gloves and Clothing
'Avoid
skin contact with Sodium Hydroxide. Wear personal
protective equipment made from material which can not be
permeated or degraded by this substance. Safety
equipment suppliers and manufacturers can provide
recommendations
on
the most protective glove and clothing
material for your operation.
' Safety equipment manufacturers recommend Butyl, Nitrile,
Neoprene, Polyvinyl Chloride, Silver Shield®/4H®, Viton and
Barrier® as glove materials for Sodium Hydroxide
in
solution and Tychem® SL, and Responder®, and
Trellchem® HPS and VPS, or the equivalent, as protective
clothing materials for Sodium Hydroxide
solid
or
solution.
' All protective clothing (suits , gloves, footwear, headgear)
should be clean, available each day, and put on before work.
Page 3
of
Eye Protection
'
Wear eye protection with side shields or goggles.
'
Wear a face shield along with goggles when working with
corrosive, highly irritating or toxic substances.
Respiratory Protection
Improper use
o
respirators is dangerous Respirators
should only
be
used if the employer has implemented a written
program that takes into account workplace conditions,
requirements for worker training , respirator fit testing, and
medical exams, as described
in
the OSHA Respiratory
ProtectionStandard (29 CFR 1910.134).
' Where the potential exists for exposure over 2 mg/m
3
use a
NIOSH approved negative pressure, air-purifying, particulate
filter respirator with
an
N, R or
P1
00 filter. More protection is
provided by a full facepiece respirator than by a half-mask
respirator, and even greater protection is provided by a
powered-air purifying respirator.
'Leave the area immediately if (1) while wearing a filter or
cartridge respirator you can smell , taste, or otherwise detect
Sodium Hydroxide (2) while wearing particulate filters
abnormal resistance to breathing
is
experienced,
or
(3) eye
irritation occurs while wearing a full facepiece respirator.
Check to make sure the respirator-to-face seal is still good.
If it is , replace the filter or cartridge.
If
the seal is no longer
good, you may need a new respirator.
'
Consider all potential sources
of
exposure
in
your workplace.
You may need a combination of filters, prefilters or cartridges
to protect against different forms of a chemical (such as
vapor and mist) or against a mixture
of
chemicals.
' Where the potential for high exposure exists, use a NIOSH
approved supplied-air respirator with a full facepiece
operated in a pressure-demand or other positive-pressure
mode. For increased protection use
in
combination with an
auxiliary self-contained breathing apparatus or
an
emergency escape air cylinder.
'Exposure to 10 mglm
3
is
immediately dangerous to life and
health. If the possibility of exposure above 10 mg/m
3
exists,
use a NIOSH approved self-contained breathing apparatus
with a full facepiece operated in a pressure-demand or other
positive-pressure mode equipped with
an
emergency escape
air cylinder.
Fire
Hazards
If employees are expected to fight fires, they must be trained
and equipped as stated in the OSHA Fire Brigades Standard
(29 CFR
191
0.156).
' Extinguish fire using an
agent suitable for type of
surrounding fire. Sodium Hydroxide itself does not burn.
'POISONOUS
GASES ARE PRODUCED
IN
FIRE.
'
Use water spray to keep fire-exposed containers cool. DO
NOT get water inside containers.
' Sodium Hydroxide
in
contact with water or moisture may
generate enough heat to ignite combustibles.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 62/75
SO IUM HY ROXI E
Spills
and
mergencies
If employees are required to clean-up spills , they must be
properly trained
and
equipped. The OSHA Hazardous Waste
Operations and Emergency Response Standard 29 CFR
1910.120) may apply.
If
Sodium Hydroxide
is
spilled or leaked, take the following
steps:
. .
Evacuate personnel and secure and control entrance to the
area.
. .
Eliminate all ignition sources
. . For Sodium Hydroxide
in
solution absorb liquids
in
dry
sand, earth, or a similar material and place into sealed
containers for disposal.
. .
Collect solid material in the most convenient and safe
manner and place into sealed containers for disposal.
. . O NOT USE WATER OR WET METHOD.
. .
Ventilate and wash area after clean-up is complete.
. . O NOT wash into sewer.
. .
It may be necessary to contain and dispose of
Sodium
Hydroxide as a HAZARDOUS WASTE. Contact your state
Department of Environmental Protection DEP) or your
regional office of the federal Environmental Protection
Agency EPA) for specific recommendations.
Handling and Storage
Prior to working with
Sodium Hydroxide
you should be trained
on its proper handling and storage
. . Sodium Hydroxide reacts with STRONG ACIDS such as
HYDROCHLORIC, SULFURIC and NITRIC); WATER; and
MOISTURE to rapidly release heat.
. . Sodium Hydroxide
reacts with METALS such as
ALUMINUM , LEAD, TIN and ZINC) to form flammable and
explosive Hydrogen gas
. . Sodium Hydroxide can form shock sensitive salts on
contact with NITROGEN CONTAINING COMPOUNDS
such as NITROMETHANE)
. . Sodium Hydroxide
is not compatible with OXIDIZING
AGENTS such as PERCHLORATES, PEROXIDES,
PERMANGANATES, CHLORATES, NITRATES,
CHLORINE, BROMINE and FLUORINE); CHLORINATED
SOLVENTS; AMMONIA; and ORGANIC MATERIALS
. . Store
in
tightly closed containers
in
a cool , well-ventilated
area away from WATER and MOISTURE
. . Sodium Hydroxide can attack IRON, COPPER, PLASTICS,
RUBBER and COATINGS.
Page 4 of6
Occupational Health Information
Resources
The New Jersey Department of Health offers multiple services
in occupational health. These services include providing
informational resources, educational materials, public
presentations, and industrial hygiene and medical
investigations and evaluations.
For more information please contact:
New Jersey Department of Health
Right to Know
PO Box 368
Trenton,
NJ
08625-0368
Phone: 609-984-2202
Fax: 609-984-7407
E-mail: [email protected]
Web address: http://www. nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb
The Right to now Hazardous Substance Fact Sheets
are
not intended
to
be
copied
and sold
for commercial purposes
.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 63/75
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
GLOSSARY
ACGIH is the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists. They publish guidelines called Threshold Limit
Values (TLVs) for exposure to workplace chemicals .
Acute Exposure Guideline
Levels (AEGLs) are established
by the EPA. They describe the risk to humans resulting from
once-in-a lifetime, or rare, exposure to airborne chem icals.
Boiling point is the temperature at which a substance can
change its physical state from a liquid to a gas.
A
carcinogen is
a substance that causes cancer.
The CAS number is unique, identifying number, assigned by
the Chemical Abstracts Service, to a specific chemical.
CFR
is
the Code of Federal Regulations , which are the
regulations of the United States government.
A combustible substance is a solid , liquid or gas that will burn.
A corrosive substance is a gas, liquid or solid that causes
destruction of human skin or severe corrosion of containers .
The
critical
temperature
is
the temperature above which a
gas cannot
be
liquefied, regardless of the pressure applied .
DEP is the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection.
DOT is the Department of Transportation, the federal agency
that regulates the transportation of chemicals .
EPA is the Environmental Protection Agency, the federal
agency responsible for regulating environmental hazards.
ERG is the Emergency Response Guidebook. It
is
a guide for
emergency responders for transportation emergencies
involving hazardous substances.
Emergency Response Planning
Guideline
(ERPG) values
prov1de estimates of concentration ranges where one
reasonably might anticipate observing adverse effects .
A fetus
is
an unborn human or animal.
A flammable substance is a solid, liquid , vapor or gas that will
1gmte eas1ly
and burn rapidly.
The flash
point is
the temperature at which a liquid or solid
g1ves off vapor that can form a flammable mixture with air .
IARC is the International Agency for Research on Cancer a
scientific group.
Ionizati on Potent ial is the amount
of energy needed to
remove an electron from an atom or molecule. It is measured
in
electron volts.
IRIS is the Integrated Risk Information System database on
human health effects that may result from exposure to various
chemicals , maintained by federal EPA.
Page 5
of
LEL or Lower Explosive Limit, is the lowest concentration of
a combustible substance (gas or vapor) in the air capable of
continuing an explosion.
mg/m3 means milligrams of a chemical in a cubic meter of air.
It is a measure of concentration (weighUvolume) .
A mutagen is a substance that causes mutations. A mutation
is
a change
in
the genetic material
in
a body cell. Mutations
can lead to birth defects, miscarriages, or cancer.
NFPA is the National Fire Protection Association. It classifies
substances according to their fire and explosion hazard .
NIOSH is the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health. It tests equipment, evaluates and approves
respirators, conducts studies of workplace hazards, and
proposes standards to OSHA.
NTP
is the National Toxicology Program which tests chemicals
and reviews evidence for cancer.
OSHA is the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration , which adopts and enforces health and safety
standards.
PEOSHA the New Jersey Public Employees Occupational
Safety and Health Act, which adopts and enforces health and
safety standards in public workplaces.
Permeated is the movement of chemicals through protective
materials.
ppm means parts of a substance per million parts of air. It
is
a
measure of concentration by volume in air
Protective
Action
Criteria (PAC) are values established by
the Department of Energy and are based on AEGLs and
ERPGs. They are used for emergency planning of chemical
release events.
A reactive substance
is
a solid, liquid or gas that releases
energy under certain conditions.
STEL
is
a Short Term Exposure Limit which
is
usually a
5
mlnute exposure that should not be exceeded at any time
during a work day.
A teratogen is a substance that causes birth defects by
damaging the fetus.
UEL or
Upper
Explosive Limit is the highest concentration in
air above which there
is
too much fuel (gas or vapor) to begin a
reaction explosion.
Vapor
Density
is
the ratio of the weight of a given volume of
one gas to the weight of another (usually Air , at the same
temperature and pressure.
The
vapor pressure is
a force exerted by the vapor
in
equilibrium with the solid or liquid phase of the same
substance. The higher the vapor pressure the higher
concentration of the substance in air.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 64/75
I
e lth Right to Know
Hazardous
Substance Fact Sheet
. . . ~ «
mergency
esponders
tick
Refnnce
Common Name: SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Synonyms: Caustic Soda; Lye; Sodium Hydrate
CAS No: 1310-73-2
Molecular Formula: NaOH
RTK Substance No: 1706
Description: Odorless, white solid that absorbs moisture from the air
H Z
RD D
T
Hazard Rating Firefighting
Reactivity
3- Heal th Extinguish fire using an agent suitable for type of
Sodium Hydroxide reacts with STRONG ACIDS (such as
0- Fire
surrounding fire. Sodium Hydroxide itself does HYDROCHLORIC, SULFURIC and NITRIC); WATER; and MOISTURE
not burn.
to rapidly release heat.
1 -
Reactivity
POISONOUS GASES ARE PRODUCED
IN
FIRE.
Sodium Hydroxide reacts with METALS (such as ALUMINUM, LEAD,
Use water spray to keep fire-exposed containers
TIN and ZINC) to form flammable and explosive Hydrogen gas.
DOT :
cool. DO NOT get water inside containers .
Sodium Hydroxide can form shock sensitive salts on contact with
UN 1823 (solid)
Sodium Hydroxide
in
contact with water or
NITROGEN CONTAINING COMPOUNDS (such as NITROMETHANE).
UN 1824 (solution)
moisture may generate enough heat to ignite Sodium Hydroxide is not compatible with OXIDIZING AGENTS (such
combustibles .
as PERCHLORATES, PEROXIDES, PERMANGANATES,
ERG
Guide
: 154
CHLORATES, NITRATES, CHLORINE, BROMINE and FLUORINE);
Hazard Class: 8
CHLORINATED SOLVENTS; AMMONIA; and ORGANIC MATERIALS.
(Corrosive)
Sodium Hydroxide
can attack IRON, COPPER, PLASTICS, RUBBER
and COATINGS.
SP
IL
L LE KS
PHYSIC L PROPERTIES
Isolation Distance:
Odor Threshold:
Spill (solid): 25 meters (75 feet) Spill (liquid) : 50 meters (150 feet)
Flash Point:
Odorless
Noncombustible
2.1 air=1)
ire: 800 meters (1/2 mile)
For Sodium Hydroxide
in
solution absorb liquids in dry sand, earth ,
or a similar material and place into sealed containers for disposal.
Collect soli material in the most convenient and safe manner
and place into sealed containers for disposal.
DO NOT USE WATER OR WET METHOD.
DO NOT wash into sewer.
Neutralize water spills with a dilute acid .
Sodium Hydroxide is hazardous to the environment, especially
water organisms.
E
XPOSURE LI MITS
OSHA: 2 mg/m
3
8-hr TWA
NIOSH: 2 mg/m
3
Ceiling
ACGIH: 2 mglm
3
Ceiling
IDLH: 10 mg/m
3
The Protective Action Criteria values are :
PAC-1 = 0.5 mg/m
3
PAC-2 = 5 mglm
3
Eyes:
Skin
:
Inhalation:
PAC-3 = 50 mg/m
3
H
E
L
TH
EFFECTS
Severe irritation, burns and possible eye
damage
Irritation and severe burns
Nose, throat and lung irritation with coughing
and severe shortness of breath (pulmonary
edema)
Gloves:
Vapor Density:
Vapor Pressure:
Specific Gravity:
Water Solubility:
Boiling Point:
Melting Point:
Molecular Weight:
0 mm Hg at 68°F (20°C)
2.1 (water = 1)
Soluble
2,534°F (1 ,390°C)
604°F (318°C)
40
PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT
Butyl , Nitrile, Neoprene, PVC, SilverShield®I4H®, Viton and
Barrier® (>8-hr breakthrough for
Sodium Hydroxide in
solution
Coveralls: Tychem® SL and Responder®, and Trellchem® HPS and VPS
(>8-hr breakthrough for Sodium Hydroxide solid or solution
Respirator: <1 0 mg/m
3
- Full facepiece APR with High efficiency filters
>10 mglm
3
- SCBA
FIRST ID ND DECONT MIN TION
Remove the person from exposure.
Quickly
brush off excess chemical from the face . Flush with large amounts
of
water
for at least 30 minutes. Remove contact lenses, if worn. Seek medical attention
immediately.
Quickly remove contaminated clothing. Immediately blot or brush off excess
chemical and wash with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes. Seek
medical attention immediately.
Begin
artificial respiration if breathing has stopped and CPR if necessary.
Transfer promptly to a medical facility.
Medical observation is recommended as symptoms may be delayed.
April2010
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 65/75
APPENDIX III
PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 66/75
Appendix III – Page 1
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
PRELIMINARY
RISK
ASSESSMENT
FOR
THE
USE
OF
CAUSTIC
SODA
IN
AN
ENGINE
EXHAUST
STACK SCRUBBING SYSTEM
1. PROLOGUE
This risk
assessment
is
referred
to
as
a “Preliminary
Risk
Assessment”
because
it
pertains to a process that is contemplated for use but does not presently exist. Should
the process be implemented, this risk assessment would require review and possible
modification to comport with any details, information derived from specific job safety
analyses and other characteristics of the process that are presently unknown.
The following risk assessment cites several United States Federal Occupational Safety
and Health Regulations (OSHA) applicable to workers involved in the process being
considered. Although the regulations may not be required for workers employed in
international waters, these regulations are based on sound, state of the art industrial
hygiene principles
that
provide
a safe
and
healthy
environment
for
workers.
2.
INTRODUCTION
The process in consideration involves adding 50% Caustic Soda solution to the scrubbing
water of an Alkali Feed System operating in closed loop mode for the purpose of
removing acid sulfur gases from engine stack emissions. Caustic Soda, or Sodium
Hydroxide, is a highly corrosive chemical and contact with this substance can severely
irritate and burn the skin and eyes leading to possible blindness. The potential hazards
of working with Caustic Soda make it important that all persons handling Caustic Soda
know and follow strict procedures for safety. This preliminary risk assessment will
address the following issues:
a. Hazard Identification
b. Protective Measures
c. Regulations Applicable to Caustic Soda
d. Risk Assessment
e. Risk Management
f. Residual Risk Summary
3.
HAZARD
IDENTIFICATION
a. Product Identification
i. Synonyms: Caustic Soda, Sodium Hydroxide, Lye, Sodium Hydrate
ii. Chemical Formula: NaOH
iii. CAS Number: 1310‐73‐2
iv. RTK Substance Number: 1706
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 67/75
Appendix III – Page 2
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
v. DOT Number: UN 1823 (solid), UN 1824 (solution)
vi. Hazardous Waste Number: D002
vii. Caustic Soda is on the Right to Know Hazardous Substances List which
requires employers using this material to comply with the Federal OSHA
Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200).
b.
Product Description
i. Solid state: odorless, white solid, absorbs moisture from air
ii. 50% Solution: odorless, clear
c. Workplace Exposure Limits
i. OSHA: The legal airborne permissible exposure limit (PEL) is 2 mg/m3
averaged over an 8‐hour work shift.
ii. NIOSH: The recommended airborne exposure limit (REL) is 2 mg/m3,
which should not be exceeded at any time.
iii. NIOSH: The airborne concentration likely to cause death or immediate or
delayed
permanent
adverse
health
effects
or
prevent
escape
from
such
an environment (IDLH) is 10 mg/m3.
iv. ACGIH: The threshold limit value (TLV) is 2 mg/m3, which should not be
exceeded at any time.
d. Potential Health Effects
i. Inhalation: May cause irritation (possibly severe), chemical burns, and
pulmonary edema.
ii. Skin contact: May cause irritation (possibly severe) and chemical burns.
iii. Eye contact: May cause irritation (possibly severe), chemical burns, eye
damage, and blindness.
iv.
Ingestion: May
cause
irritation
(possibly
severe),
chemical
burns,
nausea,
and vomiting.
v. Note: The severity of tissue damage is a function of its concentration, the
length of tissue contact time, and local tissue conditions. After exposure
there may be a time delay before irritation and other effects occur. This
material is a strong irritant and is corrosive to all human tissue.
e. First Aid
i. Eye Contact: Immediately flush eyes with a directed stream of water for
at least 15 minutes, forcibly holding eyelids apart to ensure complete
irrigation of all eye and lid tissues. Washing eyes within several seconds is
essential to
achieve
maximum
effectiveness.
GET
MEDICAL
ATTENTION
IMMEDIATELY.
ii.
Skin Contact: Immediately flush contaminated areas with water from a
safety shower. Remove contaminated clothing, jewelry, and shoes
immediately. Wash the affected skin for 15 minutes. If the eyes have not
been exposed do not remove your goggles until your head and hair has
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 68/75
Appendix III – Page 3
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
been thoroughly rinsed. Wash contaminated areas with soap and water.
Thoroughly clean and dry contaminated clothing before reuse. Discard
contaminated leather goods. GET MEDICAL ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY.
iii. Inhalation: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area. Give
artificial respiration if not breathing. If breathing is difficult, oxygen
should be
administered
by
qualified
personnel.
If
respiration
or
pulse
has
stopped, have a trained person administer basic life support (Cardio‐
Pulmonary Resuscitation/Automatic External Defibrillator) and CALL FOR
EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY.
iv. Ingestion: Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious or convulsive
person. If swallowed, do not induce vomiting. Give large amounts of
water. If vomiting occurs spontaneously, keep airway clear. Give more
water when vomiting stops. GET MEDICAL ATTENTION IMMEDIATELY.
v. Notes to Physician: The absence of visible signs or symptoms of burns
does
NOT
reliably
exclude
the
presence
of
actual
tissue
damage.
Probable mucosal damage may contraindicate the use of gastric lavage.
f. Stability and Reactivity
i. Reactivity/ Stability: Stable at normal temperatures and pressures.
ii. Conditions to Avoid: Mixing with water, acid or incompatible materials
may cause splattering and release of large amounts of heat. Will react
with some metals forming flammable hydrogen gas.
iii. Sodium Hydroxide reacts with STRONG ACIDS (such as HYDROCHLORIC,
SULFURIC and NITRIC); WATER; to rapidly release heat.
iv. Sodium Hydroxide reacts with METALS (such as ALUMINUM, LEAD, TIN
and ZINC)
to
form
flammable
and
explosive
Hydrogen
gas.
v. Sodium Hydroxide can form shock sensitive salts on contact with
NITROGEN CONTAINING COMPOUNDS (such as NITROMETHANE).
vi. Sodium Hydroxide is not compatible with OXIDIZING AGENTS (such as
PERCHLORATES, PEROXIDES, PERMANGANATES, CHLORATES, NITRATES,
CHLORINE, BROMINE and FLUORINE); CHLORINATED SOLVENTS;
AMMONIA; and ORGANIC MATERIALS.
g. Accidental Releases
i. Evacuate personnel and secure and control entrance to the area.
ii. Wear appropriate personal protective equipment recommended in
section 4 below.
iii. Completely contain spilled material with dikes, sandbags, etc.
iv.
Vacuum up for reuse or disposal.
v. Carefully dilute remaining material
vi.
Neutralize with weak acid (acetic acid) if necessary.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 69/75
Appendix III – Page 4
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
vii. Accidental releases to the environment may trigger reporting
requirements to federal, state and local authorities if threshold limits are
exceeded. The threshold limit for Caustic Soda is 1,000 lbs.
viii. In the U.S., spill reports to the National Response Center (1‐800‐424‐
8802) will comply with federal reporting requirements under CERCLA and
SARA regulations.
The
Coast
Guard
may
also
need
to
be
notified
under
the Clean Water Act.
ix. If employees are required to clean up spills, they must be properly
trained and equipped. The OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response Standard (29 CFR 1910.120) may apply.
h. Fire Emergency
i. Fire Hazard: Caustic Soda is not flammable
ii. Extinguishing Media: Use media appropriate for surrounding fire.
iii. Fire Fighting: Move container from fire area if it can be done without risk.
Cool
containers
with
water.
iv. If employees are expected to fight fires, they must be trained and
equipped as stated in the OSHA Fire Brigades Standard (29 CFR
1910.156).
4. PROTECTIVE MEASURES
a. Personal Protective Equipment
i. Eye Protection: Wear chemical safety goggles with a face shield to
protect against eye and skin contact when appropriate. Provide an
emergency eye
wash
fountain
and
quick
drench
shower
in
the
immediate
work area.
ii. Skin and Body Protection: Wear chemical resistant clothing and rubber
boots when potential for contact with the material exists. Contaminated
clothing should be removed, then discarded or laundered.
iii. Hand Protection: Wear appropriate chemical resistant gloves
iv. Protective Material Types: Natural rubber, Neoprene, Nitrile, Polyvinyl
Chloride, Viton
v. Respiratory Protection: A NIOSH approved respirator with N95 (dust,
fume, mist) cartridges may be permissible under certain circumstances
where airborne
concentrations
are
expected
to
exceed
exposure
limits,
or when symptoms have been observed that are indicative of
overexposure. If eye irritation occurs, a full face style mask should be
used. A respiratory protection program that meets 29 CFR 1910.134 must
be followed whenever workplace conditions warrant use of a respirator.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 70/75
Appendix III – Page 5
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
Where the potential for high exposure exists, such as cleaning storage
tanks, use a NIOSH approved supplied‐air respirator with a full face piece
operated in a pressure‐demand or other positive‐pressure mode. For
increased protection use in combination with an auxiliary self ‐contained
breathing apparatus or an emergency escape air cylinder.
b.
Other Protective
Measures
i. Eyewash fountains should be located near all caustic soda handling areas.
ii. Safety showers should be located directly above the eyewash fountains.
iii. Eyewash and safety showers should be designed to comply with 29 CFR
1910.151(c)—Medical Services and First Aid.
iv. Diking able to contain the entire volume of Caustic Soda in the system
should be installed.
5. REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CAUSTIC SODA
a. Private sector workers in New Jersey are covered by Federal OSHA.
b. 29 CFR 1910.1200—Hazard Communication Standard—requires that employees
be informed of chemical hazards in their workplace. Some highlights of the
standard follow:
i. Employers must develop and implement a written hazard communication
program and make that program available to employees.
ii. The program must list all hazardous chemicals known to be in the
workplace and tell employees about non routine tasks (such as cleaning
out tanks) that might expose them to the hazardous chemicals.
iii.
Containers of
hazardous
chemicals
must
be
labeled.
The
label
must
identify the chemical, its manufacturer and appropriate hazard warnings.
Employees must be trained to read such labels.
iv. Employers must have a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for each
hazardous chemical in its workplace. The MSDS must include (among
other things) the identity used on the container label; common name and
names of chemical ingredients in the hazardous chemical; physical and
chemical characteristics (such as vapor pressure and flash point); physical
hazards (such as potential for fire, explosion and reactivity to other
substances that are incompatible); health hazards (such as signs and
symptoms of
exposure);
how
the
chemical
can
enter
your
body;
permissible exposure limits; whether the chemical will cause cancer;
precautions for safe handling and use (including protective measures);
emergency and first aid procedures; when the MSDS was prepared or last
changed; the name and telephone number of the manufacturer or other
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 71/75
Appendix III – Page 6
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
source that can provide additional information (including emergency
procedures).
v. The MSDSs must be readily accessible to employees during each work
shift. Employees must be taught to use them.
vi. Employees must be informed of the location of hazardous chemicals.
vii.
Employees must
be
trained
in
how
to
detect
the
presence
of
a hazardous
chemical; its health hazards; and protective measures (including work
practices, personal protective equipment and emergency procedures).
c. EPCRA Section 311‐312‐‐ Emergency Planning and Community Right‐to‐Know Act
of 1986‐‐ applies to any facility at which a hazardous chemical, as defined by the
Occupational Safety and Health Act, is present in an amount exceeding a
specified threshold. The threshold for Caustic Soda is 10,000 lbs. Such a facility
must submit a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for each hazardous chemical
which meets or exceeds a specified threshold quantity at the facility, to the state
emergency
response
commission,
the
Local
Emergency
Planning
Committee,
and
the local fire department with jurisdiction over the facility. Reporting thresholds
are codified in 40 CFR 370.10.
d. CERCLA SECTIONS 102a/103‐‐ Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980—Accidental releases
i. CERCLA Reportable Quantity for Caustic Soda: 1,000 lb. (note: this is well
below the projected weekly use).
ii. If a release is reportable under CERCLA section 103, notify the National
Response Center at (800) 424‐8802 or (202) 426‐2675. The Coast Guard
may also need to be notified under the Clean Water Act.
e.
29 CFR
1910.120
‐‐ OSHA
Hazardous
Waste
Operations
and
Emergency
Response
Standard (HazWOPER)
i. This standard applies to emergency response operations for release, or
substantial release threat, of hazardous substances without regard to
location of the hazard.
ii. Certain requirements must be complied with under the HazWOPER
standard. These requirements include a written emergency response
plan, training, control and cleanup.
iii. Emergency Response Plan must address the following:
a. pre‐emergency planning and coordination with outside
responding agencies,
i.e.,
fire,
EMS,
police,
etc.;
b. personnel roles, lines of authority and lines of communication;
c.
emergency recognition and prevention (what constitutes an
emergency and how to prevent the occurrence);
d.
safe distances and places of refuge;
e. site security and control;
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 72/75
Appendix III – Page 7
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
f. evacuation routes and procedures;
g. decontamination procedures;
h. emergency medical treatment and first aid;
i. emergency alerts and response;
j. personal protective equipment and emergency equipment;
k.
engineering controls;
l. air monitoring
m. critique of response procedures and follow‐up.
iv. Training‐‐required for any employee who responds to an emergency.
Section Q of the standard specifies the training requirements. They are
broken down into 5 levels that are tied to specific duties.
a. Level 1: First Responder Awareness
b. Level 2: First Responder Operations
c. Level 3: Hazardous Materials Technician
d.
Level
4:
Hazardous
Materials
Specialist
e. Level 5: On‐Site Incident Commander
v. Control and Cleanup
At least two Level 2 technicians are required to slow and control a
hazardous spill as specified in 29 CFR 1910.120 (HazWOPER), which
mandates a buddy system in these circumstances. Additionally, a trained
Level 5 Incident Commander must be present.
Once the spill is contained, it must be stopped at the source, cleaned up
and disposed of properly.
f. 29 CFR 1910.156‐‐ OSHA Fire Brigades Standard
If employees
are
expected
to
fight
fires,
they
must
be
trained
and
equipped
in
accordance with the Fire Brigades Standard.
g. 29 CFR 1910.132—Personal Protective Equipment—General requirements—
requires protection for employees’ eyes, face, head and extremities in the
presence of hazards that require such protection, including, but not limited to,
chemical hazards and hazards encountered through absorption, inhalation or
physical contact.
h. 29 CFR 1910.133—Personal Protective Equipment—Eye and face protection—
requires protection against liquids and other hazards to the eyes and face.
i. 29 CFR 1910.134—Personal Protective Equipment—Respiratory protection—
includes (among
other
pertinent
subjects)
the
selection,
fitting
and
care
for
respirators and instructions to employees about the use of respirators. The
employer shall be responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a
respiratory protection program with required worksite‐specific procedures and
elements for required respirator use. The program must be administered by a
suitably trained program administrator.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 73/75
Appendix III – Page 8
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
j. 29 CFR 1910.151(c)—Medical Services and First Aid—requires suitable facilities
for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body in the work area for
immediate emergency use, where the eyes or body of any person may be
exposed to injurious corrosive materials.
6.
RISK
ASSESSMENT
Caustic Soda falls under the category of “Hazardous Substance” according to OSHA’s
Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200. It was projected that
approximately 37,000 gallons of 50% Caustic Soda solution per week would be utilized.
This quantity is equivalent to 447,700 lbs. of solution weight or 223,850 lbs. Caustic
Soda dry weight. An offset to the hazards involved in the use of this substance in this
particular application is the fact that the scrubbing system consists of a closed loop
mode, which eliminates potential employee exposure to splashing of the liquid and
aerosol formation under normal conditions of operation. However, Caustic Soda will be
directly
handled
by
employees
involved
with
unloading
tank
trucks,
bunkering
areas,
tanks, sounding pipes, feed module and bleed‐off treatment units. Additionally,
potentially greater exposure to caustic soda is probable for employees charged with the
task of cleaning storage tanks. It is conceivable that such an activity could produce
significant caustic soda aerosol inhalation exposure.
7. RISK MANAGEMENT
Based on the risk assessment of the various conditions defined in section 6, the
following risk management measures are recommended:
a. Training on the safe handling of the material must be given to every employee
involved in
the
handling,
storage
and
use
of
the
material.
b. Periodic surveillance of the storage tanks, fittings, piping and connections for
evidence of wear is required.
c. Safety showers and eye washes should be conveniently located and readily
accessible near all areas where Caustic Soda will be handled.
d. Safety showers and eye washes should be clearly marked with dedicated signs.
e. The following personal protective equipment must be worn when handling
Caustic Soda;
i. Close fitting safety goggles and chemical resistant gloves
ii. Additional clothing and equipment may be required. A job safety analysis
for each
task
involving
direct
handling
of
Caustic
Soda
needs
to
be
conducted to determine the proper personal protective equipment for
the task being performed. These risk management options include:
a. Hard hat
b.
Chemical resistant apron
c. Full face shield (in addition to close fitting safety goggles)
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 74/75
Appendix III – Page 9
SeaQuest Testing & Consulting – Preliminary Risk Assessment
d. Chemical resistant boots
e. Chemical protective suit (jacket and pants)
f. Full chemical protective suit with hood and air supplied respirator
8.
RESIDUAL
RISK
SUMMARY
Based on
the
nature
of
Caustic
Soda
solution
hazards,
its
use
in
the
closed
loop
scrubbing system and selection of appropriate risk management tools, it can be
concluded that the risk to workers and the environment can be classified as minimal.
7/25/2019 Caustic Soda Feasibility Study
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/caustic-soda-feasibility-study 75/75
APPENDIX IV
RESOURCE DISK
Available as a Separate Submittal