cardiac ct in pediatric patients marilyn j. siegel, m.d. mallinckrodt institute of radiology...
TRANSCRIPT
Cardiac CT in Pediatric Patients
Marilyn J. Siegel, M.D.Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology
Washington University School of MedicineSt. Louis, MO. USA
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Cardiac CT: Basic Facts
• Need multidetector CT
• Faster imaging times
– fewer motion artifacts
• Higher spatial resolution
– 0.5 to 1.25 mm
– superb 3D images
• Better contrast enhancement
• THE USE OF CT IS INCREASING
Frequency of Contrast Usage
• Contrast mandatory
–100% of cases
• Inherent problems in children
–Small patient size
– Lack of perivisceral fat
• Poor differentiation of soft tissue structures on non-enhanced CT scans
• Solution: IV contrast
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Indications: Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Detection of disease or pathology –i.e., diagnosis
• Improve clinical decision making–Need for other diagnostic testing–Use of specific intervention
• No role in defining normal anatomy• No role in assessing function• Not a screening tool
Specific Disease States or Pathology
• Extracardiac great vessel anomalies
• Intracardiac shunt lesions
• Post-operative anatomy
• In children, CT is performed most often for congenital diseases
Pediatric Heart Diseases
• Common extracardiac lesions– Aortic arch anomalies
– Aortic coarctation
– Interrupted arch
– Patent ductus arteriosus
– Pulmonary artery sling
Arch Anomalies
Neonate Adolescent
Right arch Double Arch
Pulmonary Sling:Left pulmonary artery arises from right pulmonary artery
Case from J. Schoepf
Neonate
Aortic Coarctation
10-day old girl with CHF; 8 cc contrast,
3D CTCT
Patent Ductus Arteriosus
CT MR
Other Indications for Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Diagnosis of cardiac shunts
–atrial septal defects
–ventricular septal defects
• Evaluate post-operative anatomy
–usually complex cyanotic heart disease
Shunt Lesion: Septal Defects
Post ASD repairASD/VSD
ASD
Post-operative Evaluation:
Graft right atrium to pulmonary artery
Grafts subclavian arteries to pulmonary arteries
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Impact on Management
• Predict whether patient should undergo further invasive diagnostic testing (angiography)
• Clarify equivocal angiographic findings
• Predict whether patient needs surgery
Therapeutic Intervention:Indications for Re-operation
Leaking Baffle
CT prompted angiography
Pseudoaneurysm
Prompted surgery
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Contrast Dosing
• Contrast volume is determined empirically based on patient weight
• Nonionic contrast medium
–280 to 320 mg I
• Dose
–2 mL/kg (max 4 mL/kg or 125 mL)
Contrast Injection
• Power Injection
–Antecubital catheter
–Flow rate: variable
»22g 1.5 -2.0 mL/sec
»20 g 2.0 -3.0 mL/sec
»24g or central line 1.0 mL/sec
• Hand Injection:
–Peripherally positioned catheter
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Limitations of Contrast-Enhanced CT
• Contrast-related:
–Extravasation at injection site
–Adverse contrast reactions
• Device-related:
–Radiation exposure
Contrast-Related Risks
• Extravasation at injection site
–Power injector: 0.4%
–Manual injection: 0.3%
Kaste Pediatr Radiol 1995; 26:449
Incidence Contrast Reactions:Meta-analysis
• LOCM(NICM)
– All 1-3%
– Minor near 1%
– Major (severe) .04% (1:10,000)
– Late 5-8%
• Mortality rate - LOCM since 1980 1:100,000
Adverse Contrast Reactions:Pediatric Population
• 321 children• Questionnaire (73% return rate)• Omnipaque 300/450 (Iohexol)• Acute reactions 1.9%
– Minor (mild) – Older patients (> 24 kg)
• Late reactions 6.2%– Mild or intermediate– Younger (< 24 kg)
Mikkonen, Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25:350
Adverse Contrast Reactions
• Nonionic n=168,363 (1986-1988)• Overall prevalence of ADRS: 3.13%
– Severe 0.04%, deaths 0.004%• 70% within 5 minutes, remainder later• Prevalence by age:
– < 10 yrs: 0.4%– 10-19 yrs: 2.52%– 20-49 yrs: 4.1-4.6%– > 50 yrs: 1.5-2.6%
Katayama H. Radiology 1990; 175:621
Radiation Exposure
Radiation Risks
• CT
– 10% of all radiological procedures
– 65% effective dose of all medical x-rays• Chest X-ray 0.10 mSv• Pediatric chest CT 1-10 mSv• Adult chest CT 7-15 mSv
• Cardiac CathCardiac Cath 20-30 20-30 mSv mSv
– (3.5 min fluoro/75 sec cine)(3.5 min fluoro/75 sec cine)
Relative Risks
• To individual:– Lifetime risk of cancer: 20-25% (1 in 4 or 5)
– Added risk: 0.05% (negligible, 1 in 2000)
• To population:– 600,000 pediatric CT’s in the US / year
– Without CT: 135,000 will die of cancer
– With CT: 135,300 will die of cancer
Courtesy Jim Brink, M.D.
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Safety Monitoring
• Dosing
– IV contrast drawn up by technologist
– Dose verified by radiologist prior to injection
– Contrast administered by radiologist
• Procedural
– Catheter site monitored for extravasation
Mitigating & Preventing Adverse Contrast Reactions
• Identify patients at risk:
–Prior moderate contrast reaction
–Medically treated asthma
• Premedication with corticosteroids
Safety MonitoringRadiation Dose
• Directly proportional to:
–Tube current
–Kilovoltage
–Scan time
–Slice thickness
–Total number of slices
Radiation Risks: Recommendations
• Optimize CT settings–Reduce tube current and voltage–Increase table speed (mm/sec)–Limit number of scans–Use automated dose reduction technology
• Eliminate inappropriate referrals for CT
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Efficacy Data
• In adults, large amount of data related to CT angiography of the coronary arteries and acute aortic events
• In children, overall paucity of data
– Minimal data on aortic imaging
• Several review articles on CT angiography of congenital heart disease
Coronary Artery Stenosis
• Several studies have shown that CT allows reliable detection of coronary artery disease
• 95% sensitivity, 86% specificity
»detecting > 50% stenosis
»vessels 2-4 mm in diameter
Nieman: Circulation 2002; 106:2051 Fayad: Circulation 2002; 106:2026
Pediatric Aortic Arch Anomalies
• 22 pediatric patients
• Confirmatory studies:
– Echocardiography (n=7)
– Angiography (n=7)
– Surgery (n=8)
• Accuracy CT: 96%
– Stenotic vessels: 2 to 5 mm in diameter
Lee E, Siegel MJ. AJR, In Press
FDA Questions: Contrast-enhanced Pediatric Cardiac CT
• Indications for CT
• Impact of CT on diagnosis & treatment
• Contrast-specific questions:
– Methods of determining dosing
– Limitations of contrast-enhanced CT
– Methods of safety monitoring
• Efficacy data (adults & children)
• Direction of future drug development or utilization for contrast agents in children
Future Directions in Contrast-Enhanced CT
• Goal: To get the highest contrast enhancement with the least amount of contrast agent
• 2 main factors affect contrast enhancement:
– Flow rate or injection duration
– Iodine concentration
Injection Rate vs. Arterial Enhancement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Con
tras
t E
nha
ncem
ent
(HU
)
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Time (sec)
1 mL/s3 mL/s5 mL/s
injection rate increases contrast enhancement
Bae 2002
Injection rate
• Higher levels of enhancement may result in smaller volumes of contrast
• But in children there is a limit how fast we can inject, because small gauge catheters and catheters in hand and foot need slower injection rate
Concentration vs. Enhancement
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30 40 50Time (sec)
Ao
rtic
CE
(H
U)
400 mgI/mL350 mgI/mL300 mgI/mL
Varying iodine concentrations
Total iodine mass and flow rate constant (5mL/s)
iodine concentration = contrast enhancement
Bae 2002
Concentration vs. Flow Rate
• Left ventricular density (200-300 HU)
– 300 mgI/mL at 3.5 mL/sec
– 400 mgI/mL at 2.5 mL/sec
• Injecting low-concentration contrast at high flow rate or higher-concentration at lower flow rate produces similar enhancement density
Becker Appl Radiol 2003; S50
Effect of Iodine Concentration
• Implication in children
• Use of higher concentration contrast material at may result in smaller contrast volumes
• Disadvantage Viscosity (not usable > 400 mgI/mL)
• Challenge for future research
CT: Future Clinical Utilization
• Ventricular function studies based on images in systole and diastole
• Pulmonary perfusion studies
– Peak attenuation & time to peak attenuation measured
Pulmo CT: Color Coded Display
Potential for studying perfusion abnormalities associated with heart/lung disease
Summary
• Role of CT will increase
• Challenges:
–Optimize contrast enhancement
–Lower radiation dose