camels & pearls rating system in vietnam
TRANSCRIPT
Presenters: Group 10
GROUP MEMBERS:
1. Trần Thu Trang
2. Vũ Minh Tuấn
3. Lê Minh Tùng
4. Trần Thị Hải Vân
5. Vũ Thị Minh Yến
6. Đặng Thị Hải Yến
7. Nguyễn Hoàng Hương
8. Phạm Vũ Diễm Hằng
News
(Week from 5/4/2010 to
12/4/2010)
Consequences
1. The trend of increasing charter
capitals in large banks like
Vietinbank, Agribank, etc.
- Increase CAR;
- Expand
operations.
2.- SBV tries to help reduce
interest rates in the banking
market;
- USD price decreased
significantly, particularly in the
black market;
– Domestic gold price increased
during the week, but went less
than the world gold price.
- The domestic
financial market
will become more
stable.
3. More than 150 ATMs in HCM
and Hanoi were found to be
electrically leaked.
- The customers’
trust in banks has
decreased.
4. Conferences in banking and
finance sector among
governors of ASEAN central
banks (7-8/4/2010 in Nha Trang
City).
- Cooperation plans
for ASEAN in this
sector.
News
(Week from 5/4/2010 to
12/04/2010)
Consequences
1. 8/4/2010: Minister of the US
Ministry of Finance came and
talked to Chinese Government
- Reduce political
tensions between
2 countries and
help unify the
exchange rate of
the 2 currencies
2. - Greek Government asks from
subsidies and supports from EU
and IMF
- Greek banks need more than
USD 20 billions to survive.
- The situation of
Greece keeps
going worse.
3. Reserve Bank of
Australia decides to
raise the cash rate
from 4% to 4.25%,
effective 7/4/2010.
- Against inflation
increasing trend
4.- Investment in Asian
stocks increased
significantly this week;
- Asian currencies,
particularly Ringgit of
Malaysia, Rupee of India,
etc. are appreciated.
- Asian economies go first
in the recovery trend after
recession.
CAMELS is an international bank-rating system
where bank supervisory authorities rate
institutions according to six factors:
C - Capital adequacy,
A - Asset quality,
M - Management quality,
E – Earnings,
L – Liquidity,
S - Sensitivity to Market Risk.
C - Capital adequacy
Capital adequacy ultimately determines how well FIs
can manage with shocks to their balance sheets.
A - Asset quality
The quality of assets depends on exposure to specific
risks, trends in non-performing loans, and the health
and profitability of bank borrowers.
M - Management quality
Sound management is the key to bank performance
but is difficult to measure as it is a qualitative
factor.
E – Earnings
Profitability keeps up the sound health of FIs. Too low
or too high profitability can both indicate problems.
L – Liquidity
Liquidity risk threats the solvency of FIs. They should
strike the tradeoff between liquidity position and
profitability so they could maintain their health sound.
S - Sensitivity to Market Risk
Market risks are risks inherent in dealing with products
and services embedded with interest rates, foreign
currencies, and financial assets and commodity
prices.
The purpose of CAMELS ratings is to determine
a bank’s overall condition and to identify its
strengths and weakness.
It’s a standardized method which allows the
assessment of the quality of banks according
to standard criteria providing a meaningful
rating.
PEARLS is a financial performance monitoring
system that consists of a set of financial ratios
or indicators that help standardize terminology
between institutions.
It is designed to offer management guidance for
credit unions and other savings institutions.
P - Protection
The primary goal of protection is to ensure that
the credit union provides depositors a safe
place to save their money.
E - Effective Financial Structure
The PEARLS system measures assets, liabilities
and capital, and recommends an "ideal“
structure for credit unions.
A - Assets Quality
The Assets Quality indicators help institutions
control delinquencies and monitor the ratio of
non-earning assets to total assets.
R - Rates of Return and Costs
The PEARLS system segregates all essential
components of net earnings to help calculate
investment yields and evaluate operating
expenses.
L - Liquidity
The maintenance of adequate liquidity reserves is
essential to sound, financial management.
S - Signs of Growth
The PEARLS system links growth of assets to
profitability and other key areas by evaluating
the strength of the system as a whole.
Executive Management Tool:
monitoring the performance of credit unions.
Standardized Evaluation Ratios and Formulas:
eliminating the diverse criteria to evaluate
operation and creates a universal financial
language.
Objective, Comparative Rankings:
comparing credit union performance on a national
basis.
Facilitate Supervisory Control:
providing the framework for a supervisory unit at
the National Federation.
PEARLS uses quantitative indicators while CAMEL
uses quantitative and qualitative PEARLS
provides an objective evaluation of financial
performance.
PEARLS evaluates the financial structure of the
balance sheet because it has a direct impact on
efficiency and profitability.
PEARLS considers growth rates, which directly
affects financial structure and helps managers in
credit unions to assess the degree of satisfaction
among member-clients.
1988 20041997
A little CAMEL CAMEL+ S= CAMELS family PEARLS
2004 2008 Future(Decision 400/2004-
QĐ-NHNN)(Decision 06/2008-
QĐ-NHNN)
Only 1 CAMELA lonely CAMEL
Target subjects of the law just covers joint-stock
commercial banks, and just few banks follow the rule,
only some large banks like ACB, BIDV, Vietinbank.
Supervision activities follow the quantitative
assessment, lack of qualitative assessment. However,
quantitative assessment depends on Vietnam
accounting standard and statistic figure at the end of
fiscal years. Therefore, the direction value of this
method is limited while risks can happen regardless of
time.
In the law, supervision must includes both on-
site and off-site activities (follow the
international bank supervision - the 20th
principle of Basel). In fact, only off–site activities
has been implemented.
The supervision activity of DIV has gradually
implemented based on CAMELS and the
coordination with Vietnamese situation.
Scoring each criterion in CAMEL (Letter “S” is
omitted)
o Capital: -2 15 points
o Asset: 0 35 points
o Management: 0 15 points
o Earnings: 0 20 points
o Liquidity: -6 15 points
TYPE
Required score
( total 100
points)
Point of each criterion (C, A, M, E, L)
A>= 80 - not lower than 65% of its maximum
score
B60 -79
>79
- not lower than 50% of its maximum
score
- one criteria 50 -65 % of its maximum
score
C50 – 59
> 59
- each criteria :>=45% of its maximum
score
- one criteria : 45% - 50% of its maximum
score
D< 50
>+ 50- one criteria : < 45% of its maximum
score
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Charter capital(VND bil)Requirement: Charter capital ≥Legal capital
5.000 5.607 9.409 13.400 11.252
CARRequirement:CAR≥8%
6.07%(-3 pts)
5.18%(-3 pts)
6.24%(-3 pts)
10.09% 8.09%
Band score 12/15 12/15 12/15 15/15 15/15
Indicators 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2.1 Credit quality
Ratio of nonperforming loansRequirement≤ 0%)
3%(-10 pts)
1.41%(-5 pts)
1.02%(-5 pts)
1.09%(-5 pts)
1.06%(-5 pts)
Band score 15/25 20/25 20/25 20/25 20/25
Indicators 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2.2 Quality of guarantee
Past-due guarantee loan
Band score 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2.3 Structure of on-balance sheet’s assets (R1)(Requirement: R1≥ 75%)
89.3% 92.4% 91.6% 92.7% 92.8%
Band score 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5
Total band score 25/35 30/35 30/35 30/35 30/35
On-balance sheets assets which can earn interest total on-balance sheet assetsR1=
Requirement:
Number of members in BOD, BOM and their
legal statuses.
Cooperation, competency, cohesiveness of
BOD and BOM’s members.
The adequacy of the audition, control and
management systems.
Gradual improvement in earnings and
performance.
Vietinbank is one of pioneer commercial banks
applying the international audition standards in
their annual reports
Vietinbank receives a lot of awards in the
industry.
Vietinbank is the trust and favorite bank of a lot
of customers.
Vietinbank’s profits increase gradually.
Management quality
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Band score 12/15 13/15 14/15 15/15 15/15
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
R2Requirement R2=20%
10.5% 13.87% 15.01% 19.75% 13.35%
Band score 9/15 9/15 12/15 12/15 9/15
R3 (bonus)If R3> 20%
7.0%(+0 pt)
7.6%(+0 pt)
6.6%(+0 pt)
6.8%(+0 pt)
9.1%(+0 pt)
Band core 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5 0/5
Total band score 9/15 9/15 12/15 12/15 9/15
• R2= Pretax profit/ owners’ equity• R3= Fee and commission income/ operating income
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Acid test ratio
Band score
9/9 9/9 9/9 9/9 9/9
Medium-long term capital usage
Band score
6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6
Total band score
15/15 15/15 15/15 15/15 15/15
Criterion Overall Band Score
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
C : Capital 12 12 12 15 15
A : Asset quality 25 30 30 30 30
M : Management 12 13 14 15 15
E : Earning 9 9 12 12 9
L: Liquidity 15 15 15 15 15
Total 73 79 83 87 84
Rating B B A A A
Standardize guidelines for banks in supervision and
risk management ; Reform of the supervision
function with both on-site and off-site supervision
Adapt CAMELS instrument for a wider variety of
usage
Develop and apply public CAMEL reports which can
become the basis for a public CAMEL rating
Add specific modules to the CAMEL to be used in instances
where these are useful
Develop additional training materials aimed at supervisors
and staff of second tier institutions. Provide training for
bank supervisors in the use of the CAMEL and work with
banking authorities in the integration of CAMELS principles.
Update the CAMELS analysis framework to reflect developments in finance and in regulation & supervision practice. Reflect the trend toward risk- based supervision in an appropriate way
Develop Management Information System to mobilize banks Improve commercial banks as the order:
Credit manual
Risk management
Corporate governance
Asset liability committee
Internal auditing
New business plan
Introduction of MIS
IT development and applications
Development of new services
PEARLS should be developed as financial
analysis tool for credit unions;
Use other credit rating of international agency
like Fitch, Moody if possible in banking
assessment.