business method patents marc gratacosmelinda macauley holly liupete perlegos strategic computing and...

14
Business Method Patents Marc Gratacos Melinda Macauley Holly Liu Pete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate 11-12-2002

Upload: reynold-booth

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

Business Method Patents

Marc Gratacos Melinda MacauleyHolly Liu Pete Perlegos

Strategic Computing and Communications TechnologyFall 2002

In-class debate 11-12-2002

Page 2: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

2

Business Method Patents Background

– Patents authorized by Constitution to “promote the progress of science and the useful arts.”

– Limited term monopoly granted to the inventor of new, useful, and non-obvious innovations.

Page 3: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

3

Business Method Patents Business Method Patents are a

Recent Development– Until the 1998 State Street decision,

business methods were deemed too abstract to be patentable.

– Business method innovation occurred prior to 1998 despite the lack of patent protection.

– What if we always had them?• Ford assembly line

Page 4: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

4

What changed?Business Method Patent Applications (Class 705)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

# o

f P

aten

ts

Patent Applications

*Source: USPTO Website http://www.uspto.gov/web/menu/pbmethod/applicationfiling.htm

Page 5: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

5

Business Method Patents

Why business method patents are flawed– Business methods are unsuitable for

patents.– Patents are not needed as incentives to

innovation in business methods.– Business method patents create

technological and economic inefficiencies.– As a result, business method patents

hamper innovation and economic development.

Page 6: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

6

Business Method Patents

Business methods are unsuitable for patent– Business methods are too vague and

broad to patent.– Business methods are too difficult and

expensive to validate.– As the foundation of commerce,

business methods should not be subject to monopoly.

Page 7: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

7

Business Method Patents Business methods are too vague and

broad for patent.– Business processes are often conceptual

and abstract.– Business process patents can apply to

multiple markets and industries, creating overbroad protection that forecloses efficient innovation.

– In the brief period since State Street, the Patent Office has issued overbroad patents.

Page 8: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

8

Business Method Patents Business methods are difficult to

validate.– Patent Office lacks the expertise and

resources– USPTO limited by the lack of

comprehensive, searchable databases of prior art

– Determining non-obviousness is difficult in the fast-changing business environment

– Examiner incentive system is skewed toward issuance

– Substantial continuing risk of issuing overly broad or otherwise defective patents

Page 9: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

9

Business Method Patents As the foundation of commerce, business

methods should not be subject to monopoly.– Business processes are the foundation of

modern commerce.– Monopolies on the business innovations

are therefore particularly damaging economically, preventing the rapid spread of efficient innovations.

– Business method patents can (and have been) used as anticompetitive weapons against competitors.• Amazon “One Click”

Page 10: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

10

Business Method Patents

Patents are not needed as incentives to innovation in business methods.– Business methods carry their own

rewards.– Past history indicates that business

process innovations flourish without patent protection.

– No evidence that newly available patent protection has encouraged greater innovation in business processes.

Page 11: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

11

Business Method Patents Business method patents create

technological and economic inefficiencies.– Business method patents cause economic

inefficiencies by preventing the adoption of efficient practices, inflicting additional costs, and may cause price distortions

– Business method patents cause technological inefficiencies by restricting the spread and enhancement of the innovation

Page 12: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

12

Business Method Patents Business method patents create

economic inefficiencies.– Limit the spread of the most efficient

business processes– Impose costs on small and large

competitors alike• “Patent ‘thicket’ can be difficult and

expensive to navigate” -David Messerschmitt

– Monopoly pricing per component will create inefficiency for both producers and consumers

Page 13: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

13

Business Method Patents Business method patents create

technological inefficiencies.– Limit the spread of the new technologies– Force the adoption of less effective

alternative technologies– Prevent the development of

enhancements to the new process except by patent owner

– Market leader can hijack new technology in favor of more profitable existing technology• Airlines – find lowest price online

Page 14: Business Method Patents Marc GratacosMelinda Macauley Holly LiuPete Perlegos Strategic Computing and Communications Technology Fall 2002 In-class debate

14

Business Method Patents Conclusion: As a result of the

foregoing factors, business method patents hamper innovation and economic development.