best practices for cqm submissions - xerox · ecac-3 evte-1 evte-2 evte-3 evte-4 evte-5 evte-6...

28
Best Practices for CQM Submissions

Upload: lamdien

Post on 18-Nov-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Best Practices for CQM Submissions

General CQM Overview

2016 Submission Requirements

2017 Submission Requirements

Selecting the Right Platform

CQM Partner Functionality Considerations

Agenda

October 11, 2016

2 October 12, 2016

HITECH’s Impact on EHR Adoption

• < 10% of hospitals had a basic EHR

• > 20% in only 2 states

2008

• Meaningful Use reporting began

• Basic EHR adoption increased to almost 30%, with 75% being certified systems

2011

• 3 out of 4 hospitals have basic EHR

• 97% of those have certified EHR

2014

3 October 12, 2016

CQM Reporting Timeline

4 October 12, 2016

2010 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017

CQMs developed as quality component of Meaningful

Use Stage 1 – Reporting via attestation

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule published;

CQMs reporting continues to be required by

MU, but requirements moved to HIQR program

– Electronic reporting becomes an option

Stage 3 Meaningful Use and 2015-

2017 MU Reporting Options rules

published – Reporting via attestation

or electronic submission

HIQR ruling establishes electronic reporting

requirement for 2016 – Reporting via

attestation or electronic submission

Electronic reporting of 4 self-selected

CQMs required for 1 calendar quarter –

Only hospitals who do not participate

in HIQR continue to attest

Electronic reporting of 8 self-selected

CQMs required for full CY – Only

hospitals who do not participate in

HIQR continue to attest

Xerox Confidential

What are

CQMs & Why

are They

Important

CQMs are tools that measure and track the quality of healthcare services provided by hospitals and providers.

5

CQMs Support

Achievement of

Health Care

Goals

Better Health

Lower Cost

Better Health Care

Hospitals who participate in HIQR must • Electronically submit 4 CQMs ‒ Self-selected from available 28

inpatient CQMs

• Report one calendar quarter of data (either Q3 or Q4 2016)

• Deadline: February 28, 2017

2016 CQM Reporting Requirements CMS

Consequences of failing to report • Hospitals who fail to meet the

above will lose Medicare Annual Payment Update

6 October 12, 2016

2016 CQMs for CMS

eAMI-1 eAMI-7a eAMI-8a eAMI-10 eSCIP-INF-1

eSCIP-INF-2

eSCIP-INF-9

eCAC-3 eVTE-1 eVTE-2 eVTE-3 eVTE-4 eVTE-5 eVTE-6

eSTK-2 eSTK-3 eSTK-4 eSTK-5 eSTK-6 eSTK-8 eSTK-10

eED-1 eED-2 ePN-6 ePC-01 ePC-05 eEHDI-

1a eHTN

7 October 12, 2016

2016 Reporting Options TJC

Option 1 – Chart

abstracted

reporting only

•Select & report on 6

chart-abstracted

measure sets

•Perinatal care required

for hospitals with >=

300 live births/year

Option 2 – eCQM

reporting only

• Select & report on 8

CQM sets

‒ Data must be reported on at

least ONE eCQM from each

set selected

• Perinatal care required

for hospitals with >= 300

live births/year

Option 3 – Combination of chart-

abstracted and eCQM reporting

• Select and report on 6 measure sets

‒ For eCQM sets, data must be reported on at least

ONE eCQM

• Perinatal care required for hospitals with >=

300 live births/year

•Hospitals encouraged to submit same

chart-abstracted and eCQM sets

‒ Reduces abstraction burden

‒ Report on only 3 sets, credit given for 6

8 October 12, 2016

Chart-abstracted Measure Sets

• ED (-1a, -2a)

• PC (-01, -02, -03, -04, -05)

• STK (-4)

• VTE (-5, -6)

• IMM (-2)

• HBIPS (-1, -2, -3, -5)

• SUB (-1, -2, -3)

• TOB (-1, -2, -3)

• OP (-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -18, -20, -21, -23)

2016 TJC Measure Options

eCQM Measure Sets

• eAMI (-7a, -8a)

• eCAC (-3)

• eED (-1a, -2a)

• ePC (-01, -05/-05a)

• eSTK (-2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -8, -10)

• eSCIP-INF (-1, -9)

• eVTE (-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6)

• eEHDI (-1a)

9 October 12, 2016

Hospitals who participate in HIQR must: • Electronically submit 8 CQMs

‒ Self-selected from available 15 inpatient CQMs

• Report full calendar year

‒ May report quarterly, bi-annually, or annually

• Deadline: February 28, 2018

• 200 hospitals will be selected for validation

‒ Scoring based on ability to submit COMPLETE charts NOT data element matches

‒ Feedback on data element matches will be provided

‒ If selected for chart-abstracted validation exempt from CQM validation

• No public reporting

2017 CQM Reporting Requirements for CMS

Consequences of failing to report OR failing validation • Hospitals who fail to

meet above will lose Medicare Annual Payment Update

10 October 12, 2016

2017 CQMs for CMS

eAMI-1 eAMI-7a eAMI-8a eAMI-10 eSCIP-INF-1

eSCIP-INF-2

eSCIP-INF-9

eCAC-3 eVTE-1 eVTE-2 eVTE-3 eVTE-4 eVTE-5 eVTE-6

eSTK-2 eSTK-3 eSTK-4 eSTK-5 eSTK-6 eSTK-8 eSTK-10

eED-1 eED-2 ePN-6 ePC-01 ePC-05 eEHDI-

1a eHTN

11 October 12, 2016

Chart-abstracted measures • Report on 5 chart-abstracted

MEASURES

• All PC measures required for hospitals with >= 300 live births/year

2017 Reporting Requirements TJC

eCQM measures • Report on 6 eCQMs

• Hospitals encouraged to report on additional eCQMs

12 October 12, 2016

Chart-abstracted Measure Sets

• ED (-1a, -2a)

• PC (-01*)

• VTE (-6)

• IMM (-2)

• PC (-02, -03, -04, -05)

2017 TJC Measure Options

eCQM Measure Sets

• eAMI (-8a)

• eCAC (-3)

• eED (-1a, -2a)

• ePC (-01, -05)

• eSTK (-2, -3, -5, -6)

• eVTE (-1, -2)

• eEHDI (-1a)

13 October 12, 2016

• Identify CQM vendor

• Identify data needs ‒ Strategy for 2016 & 2017 may be to

determine measures for submission and prepare for only those measures

‒ Must keep in mind that CMS will increase measure requirements

Preparing for CQM Submissions

• Map internal client codes to industry standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED, RXNORM)

• Validate CQM results

• Submit ‒ register, review, finalize

14 October 12, 2016

EHR certification edition • Must be 2014 Edition CEHRT for 2016

& 2017

• Must be 2015 Edition CEHRT by January 1, 2018

Ability to submit to The Joint Commission • Must be contracted and meet TJC

requirements

Supports all available CQMs

What to Look for in a CQM Partner

Flexible options for data integration and services to manage data extraction • HL7 interface

• Flat file transmissions

• QRDA (not recommended)

Services to help hospital achieve internal quality objectives • Ensure measure results reflect patient care

• Use data to identify areas of improvement and create transformation strategies

15 October 12, 2016

• Interface system allows data from all systems to be utilized for CQM calculation, ensuring completeness of data

‒ Integrate data from separate systems like ED, OB, Surgery, and other specialties that may not be integrated with certified EHR

‒ Ability to include unstructured data

• Services to assist with data extraction, mapping, submission

‒ Report writing

‒ Mapping experts

Advantages of an Interface System

16 October 12, 2016

COMPLETE DATA =

CQMs BETTER REFLECT PATIENT CARE

Ability to:

• Update client-to-industry code mappings via batch file or on code-by-code basis

• Generate a list of all patients qualifying for any CQM by location

• Summarize CQM results

• View CQM results at patient level

• Analyze data used in calculation

• Manage QRDA file header information

• Choose measures for submission and evaluate readiness

CQM Functionality Considerations

17 October 12, 2016

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Mapping

Editor

18

Xerox Confidential 19

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Census

Report

20

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Scoring

Report

21

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Measure

Category

Report

22

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Analysis

Report

23

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Maintenance

24

Xerox Confidential

CQM

Submission

25

Data Extraction Services

Data Integration

• Supports All Measures

• Census Report

• Scoring Report

• Measure Category Report

• Analysis Report

Holistic CQM Reporting

Quality Improvement Services

Things to

consider when

selecting a CQM

partner…

26

Today in Summary

Questions? Carla McCorkle, Product Manager, Midas+ Live and CPMS

Linda Justice, RN Nurse Executive

For more information contact us at [email protected]

27

© 2016 Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved. Xerox®, Xerox and Design® and “Work can Work Better” are trademarks of Xerox Corporation in the US and/or other countries.