barriers to quality/assignment
DESCRIPTION
Barriers to Quality/Assignment. Objectives Investigate the potential barriers to establishing and maintaining quality systems in Higher Education; Consider the broader perspectives of cost in relation to quality; Examine the implications for your own context at King Saud University. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2
Barriers to Quality/AssignmentObjectives• Investigate the potential barriers to
establishing and maintaining quality systems in Higher Education;
• Consider the broader perspectives of cost in relation to quality;
• Examine the implications for your own context at King Saud University.
3
Developing Quality Systems in Higher Education
What are the barriers to quality?
4
Barriers to Quality• Systems and procedures• Culture: attitudes, values• Organisational design• Management perspectives
Beckford (2002)
5
Barriers to Quality/AssignmentGROUP TASK• Examine the barriers to quality using
Beckford’s model and taking the given category, apply it to King Saud University systems;– Where are the barriers within the category you
have been given?– How could the barriers identified be
addressed/minimised?
6
Barriers Systems and Procedures
• here
7
Barriers: Culture, Attitudes, Values• here
8
Barriers: Organisational Design• here
9
Barriers: Management Perspectives• here
10
Quality: the Implications
What are the implications of quality deficits in Higher
Education provision?
11
Quality Costs• Staff time• Quality systems• Inspection• Correction
and/or Modification
• Rectification• Loss reputation
• Direct• Indirect
12
Barriers to Quality• Time• Hard work
‘… hard work and time are two of the most formidable blocking mechanisms to quality
improvement.’
Sallis (2002, page 30)
13
Gap ModelGaps between:
1) ‘Customer’ expectations and the perceptions of management
2) Management perceptions and quality specifications
3) Quality specifications and delivery4) Delivery and communication to customers5) Perceived service and expected service
Kelemen (2003)
14
Plugging the Gap• Staff development• Pro-active monitoring of:
– Resourcing– Delivery– Assessment decisions
• Clarity for:– Communication channels– Lines of responsibility
• Maintain control of quality systemsMcGhee (2003)
15
Barriers to Quality
‘Managers have to be able to let their staff take decisions
and be willing to see them make honest mistakes.’
Sallis (2002, page 31)
16
17
Total Quality Management
What is Total Quality Management ?
18
Total Quality Management
‘Total Quality Management is both a philosophy and
a methodology.’
Sallis (2002, page 3)
19
Principles of TQM1. Agreed requirements2. Requirements met first and every time3. Q improvement reduce waste/total cost4. Prevention rather than fire-fighting5. Planned management action6. Every job must add value7. Involve everybody8. Establish culture of continuous improvement9. Emphasis on measurement10. Emphasis on creativity
Flood, 1993
20
Total Quality Management
Four Quality Imperatives• Moral imperative• Professional imperative• Competitive imperative• Accountability imperative
Sallis (2002)
21
Recap: Hierarchy of Quality Concepts
Inspection
Quality Control
Quality Assurance
Total Quality Management
Prevention
Detection
Continuous improvement
22
Total Quality Management• Is about improving …
– effectiveness– competitiveness– flexibility
• Removing wasted effort• Prevention rather than detection
23
TQM Interfaces
Customer
SystemsProcesses
People
CommunicationCulture
Commitment
dti; from quality to excellence
24
Total Quality Management4 Pillars of TQM• Synergistic Relationships• Continuous improvement and self
evaluation• System of ongoing process• Leadership
25
Leadership• Top/senior management responsibility• Engineers of culture• Define role/purpose• Create staff development opportunities• Use research/practice-based information
to form policy and practice• Design initiatives
26
Total Quality Management
‘… rejects any outcome other than excellence’
Sallis (2002, page 24)
27
The role of the external examiner
• What is the role of an external examiner and what are his/her duties?
Regulations: The EssentialsCredits, marks, attempts
• “modular” scheme, based on 20- (or 30-)credit building blocks• undergraduate: 120 credits per year; 360 for BA (Hons), BSc (Hons), …• normally: level 2 contributes 30%; level 3 contributes 70%• MA, MSc: extra 60 credits in a third trimester (180 total)• module “pass mark” is 40%• undergraduate is permitted up to three attempts per module (p/g: 2)• resits are capped at 40%, unless there are mitigating circumstances• many awards have additional PSRB regulations
Decisions
• the examining board has discretion (note 10.11 and 10.12)
• pass and progress; pass and award• compensate (within a module, across the profile)• re-assessment – at next available opportunity• re-take: a module, several modules, the year• trail a module (“conditional progression” to the next
level)• defer decision, followed by a chair’s action• fail: required to withdraw
Classification Boundaries
• usual undergraduate: 70%, 60%, 50%, 40%• usual Edexcel on modules: 70% Distinction, 55% Merit, 40%
Pass• taught postgraduate:
• special provisions if within 1% or 2% of a boundary
classification overall mark Part I Part II
Distinction 70% and above 65% and above 70% and above
Merit 60% and above 55% and above 60% and above
Pass 40% and above 40% and above 40% and above
Borderlines
• if the overall average is “near“ a borderline, then further discretion is available– within 1%, the board may award the higher classification– within 2%, and if the student has 60 or more credits at
level 3 in the higher classification, then that classification may be awarded
• in both cases, the overall performance of the student needs to be considered
• credit preponderance, performance in the final-year project or dissertation, “exit velocity”, performance in a “difficult” module, …
• Academic Handbook, section 6A, section 10.2, para (iii)
Compensation
• compensate within a module– overall average mark is >=40%– element failed (but has been attempted)– have the module learning outcomes been met?– are all PSRB requirements fulfilled?
• compensate across the profile– up to one-third of the credits for undergraduate– up to one Masters module (20 or 30 credits)
• Academic Handbook, Section 6A, paras 13.1 and 13.2 (and Section 7D para 17 for taught Masters)
SUMMARY : WHERE DO EXAMINERS FIT IN?
1 Rationale : Why are you here?
2 Processes for identifying and implementing actions recommended in External Examiners’ Reports
QAA CODE OF PRACTICE
‘External examiners are appointed by an institution, and their reports are an important component of both an institution’s internal and any external quality assurance processes. Institutions should consider carefully their requirements with regard to such reports, and advise external examiners explicitly’
Quality Enhancement Strategy
• 2 Key aims To provide and utilise robust information for
the maintenance and improvement of standards of learning and teaching
To promote an ethos of self-evaluation and the continuous improvement of learning and teaching throughout the university
UWIC ACADEMIC HANDBOOK
External examiners are a key element in UWIC’s pursuance of quality enhancement and the maintenance of academic standards
They provide an objective view of the operation of the programmes they are associated with, and they enable comparisons with the standards offered in other institutions of which they have knowledge
‘External Examiners shall prepare their reports on courses for which they are responsible on at least an annual basis. Such reports are not normally subject to confidentiality, and should not therefore refer to students by name’
(Academic Handbook)
‘…Reports of External Examiners shall indicate shortcomings and/or recommend improvements as appropriate, for quality enhancement purposes’
(Academic Handbook)
QAA PRECEPTS [exploiting reports]Code of Practice Section 4 External Examiners
14…Institutions should ensure that the reports are considered within the institution at a senior level
15 Full consideration should be given by the institution to comments and recommendations contained within the reports of external examiners, and the outcomes of the consideration, including actions taken, should be formally recorded
16 Institutions should ensure that external examiners are, within a reasonable time, provided with a response to their comments and recommendations, including information on any actions taken by the institution
Where does your report go?[University Level]
All reports are received, read and summarised by the Dean of Quality and Standards
Analysis of the reports results in an overview of actions necessary at university level (eg staff development, working groups, specific guidance, dissemination of best practice)
[University Level, continued…]
Dean of Quality and Standards holds individual meetings with each School Director of Learning and Teaching
to congratulate/confirm report comments To discuss specific concerns If serious concerns, Dean of Quality and
Standards contacts Examiner directly
Where does your report go?[School Level]
After discussion a proforma (analysis grid) is completed to indicate Strengths, Issues and Action taken
All programmes’ external examiner reports are discussed at School level
The School Director of Learning and Teaching compiles an analysis for discussion at the Learning and Teaching Board
The Programme Director informs the Examiner of actions taken as a result of the report.
Annual Programme Reports Requirements
To include reports from external examiners To present issues arising from reports To detail action as a result of issues raised, and
to provide a timescale for such action
OVERVIEWINDIVIDUAL SCHOOL
Discussion at Programme Level
Programme Director prepares analysis
Discussed at School Level
Director of L and T compiles overview for presentation to Learning and Teaching
Board
Programme Director responds to External
Examiner
DEAN OF QUALITY AND STANDARDS[Dr Pam Harris]
Reads ALL Reports
Contact Dean of School or(Where Serious Concerns)
External Examiner
Provides overview of reports for the University
KEY POINTS
Your reports are recognised as a cornerstone for quality assurance and enhancement
Timeliness of reporting and responding is essential (please!)
Any concerns you may have are thoroughly and seriously considered
Highlighting course strengths is also critical for improvement activity
47