axial length and lens thickness - movu · adi abulafia, md, warren e. hill, md, douglas d. koch,...
TRANSCRIPT
-
LT
AL
Axial length and Lens Thickness
→The longer the eye, the smaller the ratio of lens to AL, i.e.
Distance from posterior lens to retina more dominant for longer AL
-> Reduced composite refractive index for whole eye.
→Conventional optical biometer uses
composite refractive index weighing this ratio of
Lens to AL which is AL dependent
However, longer eye outside of
normal eye population are
disregarded significantly when
extrapolating with linear fit because
of small population of longer eye
and some people actually have large
ratio LT not obeying the linear trend
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00
LT [
mm
]
LT/A
L ra
tio
Axial Length [mm]
AL and LT correlation
Ratio LT Linear (Ratio)
y = -0.0011x + 1.3761
1.346
1.347
1.348
1.349
1.35
1.351
1.352
1.353
1.354
1.355
20.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00
Composite Refractive index
AL [mm]
-
• Conventional Optical Biometer:Optical length from cornea to retina / composite refractive index (e.x. na=1.3761-0.0011xAL)
• ARGOS:Sum of all segments(CCT/1.375+AD/1.336+LT/1.41+PosLens-Retina/1.336 )
Error of +/-0.05mm(1.96SD) is added to
AL for IOL calculation.
Difference of how AL is calculated
Especially for longer eye(>26mm), conventional biometer
deviates with the overestimation of AL because of dividing by too
small refractive index even for the eye with large LT which is not
true to the physical size.
LT
ALo
pt/n
a
AD
CC
T Difference between two methods
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
20.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 27.00 28.00
[mm]
AL [mm]
-
63%
85%
94%
53%
80%
96%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-
Accurate prediction without AL adjustment
Barrett Universal II
*Hill-RBF based on the curated data with Alcon SN60WF only
and generally works only with bioconvex lens(+6-+30D) type
i.e. it is not as accurate if the other model is used.
-
Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement
devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas
Article · Dec 2014 · Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Reitblat O1,2, Assia EI1,3,4, Kleinmann G1,2,5, Levy A1, Barrett GD6, Abulafia A1
Barrett Universal II
Considering Lens Factor for better lens position estimation
N=73 eyes
-
Comparison of Methods to Predict Residual Astigmatism After Intraocular Lens Implantation
Adi Abulafia, MD; Warren E. Hill, MD; Maria Franchina, MD; Graham D. Barrett, MD
Journal of Refractive Surgery
October 2015 - Volume 31 · Issue 10: 699-707
Barrett Toric Calculator
• Considering Posterior curvature of cornea
• Better prediction including Against-the-rule astigmatism
• Alcon online calculator now uses Barrett Toric
-
Prediction of refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens implantation
Adi Abulafia, MD, Graham D. Barrett, MD, et al., J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41:936–944
Barrett Toric Calculator
No need for Baylor monogram shift for WTR, ATR astigmatism
-
Barrett True-K
0
20
40
60
80
100
60.3
43.1
55.248.3
67.2
84.581 82.8 81
94.8
Within ±0.5D Within±1.0D
0
20
40
60
80
100
ShammasPL Haigis-L Barrett True-K
5045.7
63.3
8076.7
80
Within ±0.5D Within±1.0D
With History of Pre-/Post-Lasik refraction
n=58 n=30
No history
% %
Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula
for intraocular lens power prediction after
laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive
keratectomy for myopia
Adi Abulafia, MD, Warren E. Hill, MD, Douglas D.
Koch, MD, Li Wang, MD, PhD,
Graham D. Barrett, MD
• Based on accurate Barrett Universal II with internally
modified K value with/without refractive surgery history
-
Barrett True-K
n=58
n=30
Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula
for intraocular lens power prediction after
laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive
keratectomy for myopia
Adi Abulafia, MD, Warren E. Hill, MD, Douglas D.
Koch, MD, Li Wang, MD, PhD,
Graham D. Barrett, MD
With History of Pre-/Post-Lasik refraction
No history