automobile design
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Automobile design
Basic Econometrics Case
Anshat Singhal B09070
![Page 2: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background
• Automobile designers worried about the gasoline mileage a car would give
• Would it result in violation of Corporate Average fuel Efficiency regulations
• Weight of the car was the main concern• The kind of factors that would affect were like a BLACK BOX to
them• The Goal is to get an equation and predict the mileage.
![Page 3: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overview
Text area
![Page 4: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Lets begin…
GPM City= .00943234+ .00001 Weight (lb)
![Page 5: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Change of scale of parameters
Text area
GP1000M City= 9.43234+ .01362 Weight (lb)
![Page 6: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Residuals
![Page 7: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Analysis
GP1000M City= 9.43234+ .01362 Weight (lb)
For 4000 lb => 63.8 GP1000M
By 95% confidence interval => 55.3-72.5 GP1000M
Cost at $1.2 per gallon => 66.36 – 87.00 $/1000M
![Page 8: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Correlations
![Page 9: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Scatter plot
![Page 10: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Do not forget the power
GP1000M City= 11.7 + .0089 Weight (lb) +.088 HorsepowerR2 from 77% to 84 %Horse power capture one third of residual variation with t statistic = 7.29
![Page 11: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Scatter plot/ Residual plot
Discreetness of responseskewness in the residual has reduced
![Page 12: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Weight v. Horsepower
High Correlation
![Page 13: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Weight is the real problem
![Page 14: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
HP/Pound by weight
• T statistic of weight is higher• R2 is good at 84%
![Page 15: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Variation Explained
![Page 16: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Final..
![Page 17: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Conclusion
• Weight and Horsepower are the important factors
• Power to weight gives the better equation
Prediction Interval• [57.3-71.3]GP1000M=> [14.0-17.5] MPG
![Page 18: Automobile design](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081502/5585bca5d8b42a40548b4e34/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Thank you