annual report for the year ended 2011

7/31/2019 Annual Report for the Year Ended 2011

1/63


2/63

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Mayors Message.. 3

Part 1. Executive Summary... 4

Part 2. The State of Performance.. 6

1.1 On Administrative Governance........ 6

1.1.1 Area with Excellent Performance 7

1.1.2 Areas for Improvement 7

1.2 On Social Governance.. 7



1.3 On Economic Governance 9



1.4 On Environmental Governance. 10

1.4.1 Area with Excellent Performance 101.4.2 Areas for Improvement 10

1.5 On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance 11

1.5.1 Area with Excellent Performance 111.5.2 Areas for Improvement 12

Part 3. State of Productivity.. 13

3.1 On Administrative Governance 13

3.2 On Social Governance.. 14

3.3 On Economic Governance 15

3.4 On Environmental Governance. 16

3.5 On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance 18

Part 4. Priority Strategies for Implementation.. 20

Attachments

1.1 LGU Profile.. 22

1.2 Vision Statement... 231.3 Resource Endowments.. 24

1.4 Potential Investment Areas... 27

2.1 Status of Appropriations, Allotments and Obligations. 30

2.2 Statement of Income and Expenditure.. 32

2.3 Financial Performance Report.. 35

3.1 20% Development Fund Accomplishment Report Summary... 42

3.2 Pictures of Programs and Projects Implemented in CY 2011... 43

4.1 List of Ordinances Approved 55

4.2 List of Resolutions Approved... 57

5.1 List of Executive Orders... 63


3/63

3

MESSAGE

The challenge of managing a local government unit is becoming more complex due to

increasing population pressures for basic services and support infrastructures, employment

opportunities, food security, in-migration, equitable sharing of scarce resources, climate change,and disaster preparedness and mitigation. Faced with these challenges, it is imperative to

strengthen the role of our local government in service delivery as we explore new approaches forimproving our performance.

Strategies and mechanisms for effective service delivery identified in this Annual Reporttakes into consideration issues of poverty reduction, peoples participation, the promotion ofgender equality, environmental sustainability and economic and social equity for more

sustainable results. Our LGU will acquire new knowledge, create new structures, and undertake

innovative programs that are more responsive to the needs of the community and developlinkages and partnerships as part of an integrated approach that will optimize the role of our local

government unit in providing improved services.

Moreover, we will continue to aspire for economic prosperity by promoting Leganes as acompetitive location for commercial and industrial establishments. The increase in private

investment will guarantee employment opportunities and funding for social services.

We are optimistic that through persistence and hard work we will achieve our goal of

sustainable development.

ENRIQUE M. ROJAS

Municipal Mayor


4/63

4

Part 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Annual Report is a comprehensive report which discusses the local governmentunits state of performance, productivity and development conditions. The Annual Reportreflects the results taken from the Local Government Performance Management System

(LGPMS) and it aims to improve local government management and operations, suggests waysto provide high quality and essential public services, improve planning, budgeting and rational

allocation of resources, stimulates innovations, strengthen transparency, accountability, equity

and participation; and, help achieve a focused vision for the future.

The LGPMS, as an assessment tool, has the ability to identify service improvement areas

and determine the extent of improvements achieved in the areas of governance, administration,

social services, economic development and environmental management. It encourages the

application of a service delivery performance scoring system. Besides determining the level ofperformance, the rating system enables local officials to identify and define a problem, undertake

corrective actions, and detect the extent of improvements. A more conscious recognition and useof performance measure enable local officials to improve the quality of local policies, programs

and services. The results generated by the LGPMS are communicated to primary and secondary

stakeholders through this Annual Report.

A comparative examination of the performance of the Municipality of Leganes in the five

performance areas of governance, administration, social services, economic development and

environmental management, shows that the Municipality has excelled beyond benchmark in theareas of Human Resource Management and Development, Support to Housing and Basic

Utilities, Forest Ecosystems Management, and Transparency. The efforts of the current

administration have paved the way for these achievements.

In the 21-months that this administration has been in place, we have received external

funding for programs and projects that have helped in the development of the Municipality.

Hereunder are a few of these projects:

1. Concreting of Beach Road in the amount of P 4,000,000.00;2. P 500,000.00 financial assistance for indigent patients confined at the West Visayas

State University Medical (WVSUMC);

3. Improvement of Gymnasium;4. Improvement of the 2nd floor of the Leganes Commercial Complex (LCC);5. P 5,000,000.00 for the improvement of Mayors Drive and Sandoval Street;6. Improvement of the Rural Health Unit in the amount of P 4,000,000.00;7. Road widening from Barangay Buntatala to Poblacion;8. Extension of MIWD service area along the Costal Road; and9. Mangrove reforestation program that aims to reforest the coastal area of the

municipality as a climate change mitigation. Bungalon and bakhaw were planted in

Barangays Gua-an and Nabitasan.


5/63

5

Hopefully by this year, we will be able to make improvements in the areas of Resource

Allocation and Utilization, Local Legislation, Customer Service - Civil Applications, Revenue

Generation, Development Planning, Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management, Support to

Education Services, Health Services, Support to Fishery Services, Entrepreneurship, Businessand Industry Promotion, Support to Agriculture Sector, Freshwater Ecosystems Management,

Coastal Marine Ecosystems Management, Urban Ecosystems Management, Financial

Accountability, and Participation by implementing the strategies embodied in Part 4 of thisReport and in our Comprehensive Development Plan for CY 2012 to 2014.

This volume is organized in four (4) parts. After the introductory part, the succeedingparts and their respective subjects are briefly described as follows:

Part 2 describes the obtaining capacity level and the factors and circumstances that bear

upon it.

Part 3 describes the reach and quality of essential public services delivered and identifies

gaps, issues and challenges that have to be addressed relative hereto.

Part 4 embodies the priority strategies for implementation.


6/63

6

Part 2

THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE

Highlighted in this report is the LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1)Administrative Governance, (2) Social Governance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4)

Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how the fundamentals of

good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued inthe LGU. It is to note that the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the

LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMS database. A Performance Scale is used

to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement.

Although scales of 3 and 4 are relatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All

these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.

2.1 On Administrative GovernanceAdministrative Governance looks into six areas: Local Legislation, Development

Planning, Revenue Generation, Resource Allocation and Utilization, Customer Service and

Human Resource Management and Development. Your LGU performance in each area ofAdministrative Governance is plotted in the graph below.

Figure 1. Performance on Administrative Governance


7/63

7

2.1.1 Area with Excellent PerformanceThe Municipality of Leganes is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 6 sub-areas of

Administrative Governance.

Table 1. Area with Excellent Performance on Administrative GovernanceArea with Excellent Performance Interpretation

Human Resource Management and

Development

Managing the human resource is geared towards a desired end which is "desirable organizational

performance and productivity.

2.1.2 Areas for Improvement

The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets thelowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively:

Table 2. Area for Improvement on Administrative GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Resource Allocation

and Utilization

2.75

Low

Weak management and coordination processes in budgeting and accounting. Strengthen. Fundamental in

governance is the effective allocation and optimum utilization of resources.

Local Legislation 2.97

Low

Quality legislation is a hallmark of good local governance. The local government is way off-mark. It bears

emphasizing that quality legislation is desired, deliberate and planned. Accord importance to the building oflegislative staff competence, and the use or the resort to research-based agenda development, legislative

tracking, backstopping committee and legislative performance.

Customer Service -Civil Applications

4.50High but not

Excellent

The civil application system needs to be transformed into a seamless transactional process. After all, theinherent motivation of putting up such a system is to ensure the ease of obtaining civil registry and real

property documents.

Revenue Generation 4.85

High but notExcellent

Existing measures in support of revenue generation need to be enhanced. This is an initial yet essential step in

maximizing revenue generation potentials.

DevelopmentPlanning

4.91High but not

Excellent

Improvements in the following areas are underscored: (a) organizational performance; (b) consultationprocess; and (c) management of planning database. These areas are instrumental in quality land use and

development planning, or lack of it.

2.2 On Social Governance

Social Governance looks into four areas: Health Services, Support to Education Services,Support to Housing and Basic Utilities, and Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management. The

LGU performance in each area of Social Governance is plotted in the graph below.


8/63

8

Figure 2. Performance on Social Governance

2.2.1 Area with Excellent Performance

The LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 4 sub-areas of Social Governance.

Table 3. Area with Excellent Performance on Social GovernanceArea with Excellent Performance Interpretation

Support to Housing and Basic

Utilities

An administrative mechanism dedicated to addressing the multiple requirements of housing services is in place.

Mass housing project and donation of lots for socialized housing are twin-response to the housing backlog.


The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the

lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively:

Table 4. Areas for Improvement on Social GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Peace, Security andDisaster Risk Management

3.77Fair

Efforts are made to ensure Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management. But much more need to bedone. Factors that have the ability to improve performance in this area have to be considered.

Support to EducationServices

4.35High but not

Excellent

A certain level of support to basic education is extended. However, further assistance to matters suchas the following is encouraged. The Local School Board might have to do more to advance the causeof those in need of quality education.

Health Services 4.44

High but not

Excellent

The overall quality of the local health system deserves a second look. This is so because performance

falls short in certain aspects. The principal support system on this matter is the Local Health Board. It

might have to do more.


9/63

9

2.3 On Economic Governance

Economic Governance looks into three areas: Support to Agriculture Sector, Support to

Fishery Services, and Enterprise, Business and Industry Promotion. The report varies according

to the nature of economic activities in the locality. Support to agriculture or fishery services arefiltered out if not applicable. The LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph below.

Figure 3. Performance on Economic Governance


None of the 3 areas in Economic Governance marked "excellent performance" so far.Meantime, dedicate more time and effort on the areas for improvement.



lowest performance scale followed by areas which get higher performance scales, respectively.

Table 5. Areas for Improvement on Economic GovernancePriority Area for Improvement Performance

Description

Interpretation

Support to Fishery Services 1.55Very Low

Support to fishery services is weak. Ensure focused and committed actions to resolvefactors that pull down performance in this sector.

Entrepreneurship, Business and

Industry Promotion

3.29

Fair

More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment. Factors such

as the following need to be looked into.

Support to Agriculture Sector 4.57

High but not

Local government support is extended to the Agriculture Sector. But greater

intervention is necessary.


10/63

10

Priority Area for Improvement Performance

Description

Interpretation

Excellent

2.4 On Environmental Governance

Environmental Governance looks into four areas: Forest Ecosystem Management,

Freshwater Ecosystem Management, Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management, and UrbanEcosystem Management. The report varies according to local ecosystems. Ecosystems which are

not related to the LGU are filtered out. The LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph

below.

Figure 4. Performance on Environmental Governance


The LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 4 sub-areas of EnvironmentalGovernance

Table 6. Area with Excellent Performance on Environmental GovernanceArea with Excellent Performance Interpretation

Forest Ecosystems Management Forest ecosystem management is central to the concerns of the LGU. Long-term planning is paramount.

CSOs and citizens are mobilized in forest protection. Areas for reforestation and protection are set, and thattarget areas for reforestation and protection are met.





11/63

11

Table 7. Areas for Improvement on Environmental GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Freshwater Ecosystems

Management

2.67

Low

Minimal effort or low capacity in Freshwater Ecosystem Management. Take note of the factors that pull

down performance. The way forward is to improve performance. The thinking is that the leaders today

are merely stewards of this resource - to preserve and to protect.

Coastal MarineEcosystems

Management

3.67Fair

More efforts need to be done in this area.

Urban EcosystemsManagement

4.03High but not

Excellent

Pollution control and proper solid waste management are essential in preserving the integrity of theenvironment. More need to be done.

2.5 On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance

This section of the report describes how the LGU values and maintains good governancein the context of Transparency, Participation, and Financial Accountability.

Figure 5. Performance on Valuing Fundamentals of Governance


The LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Valuing

Fundamentals of Governance.

Table 8. Area with Excellent PerformanceArea with Excellent Performance Interpretation

Transparency Transparency in governmental operations is remarkable. Communicating to the public through various means, i.e.,

Bulletin Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print, broadcast media, website, and forum, is valued.


12/63

12




Table 9. Areas for Improvement on Valuing Fundamentals of GovernancePriority Area for Improvement Performance Description Interpretation

Financial Accountability 3.99

Fair

Efforts to improve financial accountability are acknowledged.

However, administrative capacity to ensure observance ofguidelines relative to accounting, internal control, procurement

and financial transactions need to be strengthened.

Participation 4.33

High but not Excellent

Strengthening CSO participation in Local Special Bodies and the

Citizen Feedback system, including the maximization of CSO

engagement in development projects is a must action. There aremerits to it. In addition to the principal of participation, other

desirable governance values like transparency, accountability and

consensus-influenced decisions are reinforced.


13/63

13

Part 3

STATE OF PRODUCTIVITY

3.1 On Administrative Governance

Table 10. Provincial Performance Summary on Administrative Governance, 2011Performance

Description

Local

Legislation

Development

Planning

Revenue

Generation

Resource Allocation

and Utilization

Customer Service -

Civil Applications

Human Resource

Management andDevelopment

Excellent 0 7 1 0 16 34

High 14 26 15 5 27 7

Fair 16 10 14 13 0 2

Low 11 0 13 19 0 0

Very Low 2 0 0 6 0 0

No Data 0 0 0 0 0 0

Note: Total No. of Component LGUs is 43

Table 11. Component LGU Performance on Administrative Governance, Province of Iloilo, 2011Component

LGU

Income

Class

Local

Legislation

Development

Planning

Revenue

Generation

Resource

Allocation and

Utilization

Customer Service -

Civil Applications

Human Resource

Management and

Development

1 Passi City 3rd 4.45 4.19 2.83 4.33 5.00 5.00

2 Calinog 1st 3.09 3.83 4.19 2.71 5.00 5.00

3 Dumangas 1st 2.56 3.98 3.67 2.92 4.80 5.00

4 Janiuay 1st 3.64 5.00 2.93 4.38 4.80 5.00

5 Lambunao 1st 3.00 4.76 3.19 2.92 5.00 5.00

6 Miag-ao 1st 3.72 4.55 4 .19 3.92 5.00 5.00

7 Oton 1st 4.33 4.69 3.83 2.71 5.00 5.00

8 Pavia 1st 4.53 5.00 4.33 3.63 4.30 5.00

9 Pototan 1st 2.64 4.76 4.67 2.92 4.75 5.0010 Ajuy 2nd 4.09 4.33 3.00 2.33 5.00 5.00

11Barotac

Nuevo2nd 3.58 4.63 3.59 2.33 4.10 4.20

12 Cabatuan 2nd 2.64 4.86 3.67 2.92 4.80 4.20

13 Carles 2nd 2.97 4.81 2 .56 3.83 4.30 5.00

14 Estancia 2nd 2.25 3.82 4.85 2.71 4.60 3.80

15 San Joaquin 2nd 2.11 3.10 2.70 3.75 4.35 5.00

16 Sara 2nd 2.50 3.23 3.45 4.92 4.60 4.60

17 Tigbauan 2nd 4.39 4.91 3.50 1.75 4.15 5.00

18 Alimodian 3rd 4.81 5.00 4.33 4.00 5.00 5.00

19 Barotac Viejo 3rd 4.14 5.00 2.85 1.91 4.15 4.20

20 Concepcion 3rd 3.70 4.24 4.19 2.92 4.80 5.00

21 Dingle 3rd 3.45 4.86 4 .09 3.67 4.80 5.00

22 Leon 3rd 3.64 4.86 2.93 2.92 4.60 4.20

23 Maasin 3rd 3.54 4.91 2.93 2.71 4.60 5.00

24 San Enrique 3rd 2.92 4.81 4.78 1.83 4.25 5.00

25 Sta. Barbara 3rd 4.17 4.89 4.67 3.79 4.80 5.00

26 Anilao 4th 4.89 5.00 3 .67 3.00 5.00 5.00

27 Badiangan 4th 2.47 3.48 4.26 2.75 5.00 5.00

28 Balasan 4th 4.67 4.63 3.17 1.00 4.50 5.00

29 Banate 4th 3.61 4.24 2 .85 2.71 4.75 5.00

30 Bingawan 4th 3.11 4.11 3.59 1.79 4.80 5.00


14/63

14

ComponentLGU

IncomeClass

LocalLegislation

DevelopmentPlanning

RevenueGeneration

ResourceAllocation and

Utilization

Customer Service -Civil Applications

Human ResourceManagement and

Development

31 Duenas 4th 3.11 4.12 2.93 3.00 4.80 5.00

32 Guimbal 4th 4.17 3.86 3.67 2.33 5.00 5.00

33 Igbaras 4th 1.83 4.55 2.85 3.92 4.10 5.00

34 Leganes 4th 2.97 4.91 4.85 2.75 4.50 5.00

35 Lemery 4th 3.29 3.95 2.85 2.94 5.00 4.20

36 New Lucena 4th 4.67 4.91 4.67 3.92 5.00 5.00

37 San Dionisio 4th 1.22 3.69 3.50 2.50 5.00 4.20

38 San Rafael 4th 2.00 4.30 2.93 3.92 4.60 5.00

39 Tubungan 4th 4.89 4.91 3.00 3.50 5.00 5.00

40 Zarraga 4th 3.89 3.56 4.11 1.91 4.00 3.40

41 Batad 5th 3.39 5.00 2.33 2.21 4.80 5.00

42 Mina 5th 4.75 4.91 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00

43 San Miguel 5th 3.54 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00

3.2 On Social Governance

Table 12. Provincial Performance Summary on Social Governance, 2011PerformanceDescription

HealthServices


Support to Housing and BasicUtilities

Peace, Security and Disaster RiskManagement

Excellent 12 12 23 3

High 31 20 3 26

Fair 0 7 7 12

Low 0 4 2 2

Very Low 0 0 8 0

No Data 0 0 0 0


Table 13. Component LGU Performance on Social Governance, Province of Iloilo, 2011Component

LGU

Income

Class

Health

Services

Support to Education

Services

Support to Housing and Basic

Utilities

Peace, Security and Disaster Risk

Management

1 Passi City 3rd 4.67 5.00 4.60 4.80

2 Calinog 1st 4.59 4.70 2.60 3.08

3 Dumangas 1st 4.47 4.70 3.40 4.60

4 Janiuay 1st 4.97 4.50 4.20 4.68

5 Lambunao 1st 4.90 3.85 5.00 4.22

6 Miag-ao 1st 4.84 4.80 4.20 4.75

7 Oton 1st 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.74

8 Pavia 1st 5.00 5.00 3.40 4.95

9 Pototan 1st 4.90 3.85 5.00 4.40

10 Ajuy 2nd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.53

11 Barotac Nuevo 2nd 4.73 5.00 5.00 4.35

12 Cabatuan 2nd 4.97 5.00 2.60 4.30

13 Carles 2nd 4.81 4.05 5.00 3.83

14 Estancia 2nd 4.97 3.55 3.40 3.38

15 San Joaquin 2nd 4.73 4.40 1.00 2.59

16 Sara 2nd 4.21 3.60 1.00 3.82

17 Tigbauan 2nd 4.03 4.00 1.00 3.83

18 Alimodian 3rd 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

19 Barotac Viejo 3rd 4.89 5.00 5.00 4.32

20 Concepcion 3rd 5.00 4.90 5.00 4.47


15/63

15

ComponentLGU

IncomeClass

HealthServices


Support to Housing and BasicUtilities

Peace, Security and Disaster RiskManagement

21 Dingle 3rd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.68

22 Leon 3rd 5.00 5.00 3.40 4.57

23 Maasin 3rd 4.90 4.35 5.00 4.08

24 San Enrique 3rd 4.97 3.85 5.00 4.52

25 Sta. Barbara 3rd 4.97 4.55 3.40 4.20

26 Anilao 4th 4.97 4.65 5.00 4.76

27 Badiangan 4th 5.00 4.25 1.00 4.55

28 Balasan 4th 4.10 2.90 5.00 2.81

29 Banate 4th 4.60 4.30 5.00 3.54

30 Bingawan 4th 4.97 4.45 1.00 4.49

31 Duenas 4th 4.33 4.55 5.00 3.35

32 Guimbal 4th 5.00 4.75 5.00 4.90

33 Igbaras 4th 4.34 4.05 3.40 3.36

34 Leganes 4th 4.44 4.35 5.00 3.77

35 Lemery 4th 5.00 2.15 1.00 4.44

36 New Lucena 4th 4.97 5.00 5.00 5.00

37 San Dionisio 4th 4.90 2.30 1.80 3.56

38 San Rafael 4th 4.90 2.80 1.00 4.73

39 Tubungan 4th 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.8940 Zarraga 4th 4.55 3.20 3.40 3.38

41 Batad 5th 4.48 3.25 5.00 3.64

42 Mina 5th 5.00 4.80 5.00 5.00

43 San Miguel 5th 4.73 4.10 5.00 4.50

3.3 On Economic Governance

Table 14. Provincial Performance Summary on Economic Governance, 2011Performance Description Support to Agriculture Sector Support to Fishery Services Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry Promotion

Excellent 1 0 4

High 28 11 19

Fair 12 4 12

Low 0 2 7

Very Low 2 2 1

No Data 0 0 0


Table 15. Component LGU Performance on Economic Governance, Province of Iloilo, 2011Component

LGU

Income

Class

Support to Agriculture

Sector

Support to Fishery

Services

Entrepreneurship, Business and Industry

Promotion

1 Passi City 3rd 3.67 4.60

2 Calinog 1st 3.22 3.19

3 Dumangas 1st 4.00 3.61 3.10

4 Janiuay 1st 4.67 3.15

5 Lambunao 1st 3.95 3.54

6 Miag-ao 1st 4.81 4.90 4.38

7 Oton 1st 4.67 4.65 4.50

8 Pavia 1st 4.67 4.94

9 Pototan 1st 3.07 4.44

10 Ajuy 2nd 4.67 4.75 5.00

11 Barotac Nuevo 2nd 3.90 4.24 4.48

12 Cabatuan 2nd 4.81 3.94


16/63

16

ComponentLGU

IncomeClass

Support to AgricultureSector

Support to FisheryServices

Entrepreneurship, Business and IndustryPromotion

13 Carles 2nd 4.61 4.80 1.40

14 Estancia 2nd 1.79 3.88 2.60

15 San Joaquin 2nd 3.62 4.45 2.81

16 Sara 2nd 3.50 3.19

17 Tigbauan 2nd 3.93 2.96 3.19

18 Alimodian 3rd 5.00 5.00

19 Barotac Viejo 3rd 3.90 3.87 4.52

20 Concepcion 3rd 4.67 4.75 5.00

21 Dingle 3rd 4.67 4.21

22 Leon 3rd 4.86 4.44

23 Maasin 3rd 4.38 4.33

24 San Enrique 3rd 4.24 3.13

25 Sta. Barbara 3rd 4.62 4.61

26 Anilao 4th 4.71 4.75 4.94

27 Badiangan 4th 3.57 4.08

28 Balasan 4th 4.05 2.98 2.79

29 Banate 4th 3.90 3.33 4.09

30 Bingawan 4th 4.33 4.65

31 Duenas 4th 3.48 2.9432 Guimbal 4th 4.62 4.30 4.69

33 Igbaras 4th 1.93 3.36

34 Leganes 4th 4.57 1.55 3.29

35 Lemery 4th 4.00 3.15

36 New Lucena 4th 4.86 4.61

37 San Dionisio 4th 4.24 4.25 2.52

38 San Rafael 4th 4.07 2.94

39 Tubungan 4th 4.86 5.00

40 Zarraga 4th 4.14 1.96 2.36

41 Batad 5th 4.00 4.18 3.61

42 Mina 5th 4.76 4.17

43 San Miguel 5th 4.67 4.94

Note: Blank cell means "Not Applicable"

3.4 On Environmental Governance

Table 16. Provincial Performance Summary on Environmental Governance, 2011PerformanceDescription

Forest EcosystemsManagement

Freshwater EcosystemsManagement

Coastal Marine EcosystemsManagement

Urban EcosystemsManagement

Excellent 27 27 17 0

High 2 6 1 28

Fair 4 4 1 11

Low 2 1 0 3

Very Low 5 5 0 1

No Data 0 0 0 0Note: Total No. of Component LGUs is 43


17/63

17

Table 17. Component LGU Performance on Environmental Governance, Province of Iloilo, 2011Component

LGU

Income

Class

Forest Ecosystems

Management

Freshwater Ecosystems

Management

Coastal Marine Ecosystems

Management

Urban Ecosystems

Management

1 Passi City 3rd 5.00 4.00 4.00

2 Calinog 1st 3.67 3.67 3.13

3 Dumangas 1st 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.984 Janiuay 1st 5.00 5.00 3.75

5 Lambunao 1st 5.00 3.67 3.38

6 Miag-ao 1st 5.00 1.00 5.00 4.38

7 Oton 1st 3.67 5.00 4.67 4.40

8 Pavia 1st 1.00 5.00 4.63

9 Pototan 1st 5.00 5.00 4.10

10 Ajuy 2nd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.15

11 Barotac Nuevo 2nd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.40

12 Cabatuan 2nd 5.00 4.38

13 Carles 2nd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.48

14 Estancia 2nd 5.00 5.00 3.10

15 San Joaquin 2nd 4.33 1.00 5.00 1.63

16 Sara 2nd 5.00 4.67 4.38

17 Tigbauan 2nd 1.00 3.67 5.00 3.64

18 Alimodian 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.75

19 Barotac Viejo 3rd 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75

20 Concepcion 3rd 5.00 1.00 5.00 4.38

21 Dingle 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.13

22 Leon 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.38

23 Maasin 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.25

24 San Enrique 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.25

25 Sta. Barbara 3rd 5.00 5.00 4.25

26 Anilao 4th 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75

27 Badiangan 4th 5.00 5.00 2.78

28 Balasan 4th 5.00 5.00 5.00 2.60

29 Banate 4th 1.00 1.00 5.00 4.20

30 Bingawan 4th 1.00 3.67 4.0031 Duenas 4th 3.67 5.00 3.83

32 Guimbal 4th 4.33 5.00 4.05

33 Igbaras 4th 1.00 1.00 2.23

34 Leganes 4th 5.00 2.67 3.67 4.03

35 Lemery 4th 3.33 5.00 3.95

36 New Lucena 4th 5.00 5.00 4.75

37 San Dionisio 4th 2.67 4.67 5.00 4.09

38 San Rafael 4th 5.00 5.00 3.30

39 Tubungan 4th 5.00 5.00 4.88

40 Zarraga 4th 2.67 4.00 5.00 3.51

41 Batad 5th 4.67 4.67 5.00 3.36

42 Mina 5th 5.00 5.00 4.38

43 San Miguel 5th 5.00 5.00 4.25

Note: Blank cell means "Not Applicable"


18/63

18

3.5 On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance

Table 18. Provincial Performance Summary on Valuing Fundantals of Governance, 2011Performance Description Participation Transparency Financial Accountability

Excellent 13 10 6

High 23 26 36

Fair 4 4 1

Low 2 2 0

Very Low 1 1 0

No Data 0 0 0


Table 19. Component LGU Performance on Valuing Fundamentals of Governance, Province of

Iloilo, 2011Component LGU Income Class Participation Transparency Financial Accountability

1 Passi City 3rd 4.00 5.00 4.59

2 Calinog 1st 3.67 3.93 4.483 Dumangas 1st 4.33 4.60 4.68

4 Janiuay 1st 5.00 5.00 4.67

5 Lambunao 1st 4.33 4.60 4.56

6 Miag-ao 1st 4.33 5.00 4.17

7 Oton 1st 5.00 5.00 4.64

8 Pavia 1st 4.33 4.87 4.92

9 Pototan 1st 3.67 4.73 4.83

10 Ajuy 2nd 5.00 4.87 4.85

11 Barotac Nuevo 2nd 4.00 4.47 4.30

12 Cabatuan 2nd 5.00 4.87 4.42

13 Carles 2nd 4.33 4.60 4.21

14 Estancia 2nd 1.83 4.47 4.36

15 San Joaquin 2nd 4.33 4.20 4.68

16 Sara 2nd 4.33 4.20 4.72

17 Tigbauan 2nd 4.00 3.27 4.51

18 Alimodian 3rd 5.00 5.00 5.00

19 Barotac Viejo 3rd 4.00 4.33 4.56

20 Concepcion 3rd 5.00 4.60 5.00

21 Dingle 3rd 4.33 3.13 5.00

22 Leon 3rd 4.33 4.87 4.92

23 Maasin 3rd 3.50 5.00 4.81

24 San Enrique 3rd 4.00 2.73 4.72

25 Sta. Barbara 3rd 4.33 4.73 4.89

26 Anilao 4th 5.00 5.00 5.00

27 Badiangan 4th 3.67 4.47 4.44

28 Balasan 4th 4.00 4.73 4.89

29 Banate 4th 4.33 4.73 4.8130 Bingawan 4th 5.00 4.60 4.48

31 Duenas 4th 4.00 4.60 4.64

32 Guimbal 4th 4.00 5.00 4.62

33 Igbaras 4th 2.33 2.60 4.28

34 Leganes 4th 4.33 5.00 3.99

35 Lemery 4th 4.33 4.20 4.79

36 New Lucena 4th 5.00 5.00 4.75

37 San Dionisio 4th 5.00 3.00 4.03

38 San Rafael 4th 5.00 4.20 4.40


19/63

19

Component LGU Income Class Participation Transparency Financial Accountability

39 Tubungan 4th 5.00 4.87 5.00

40 Zarraga 4th 2.17 1.27 4.31

41 Batad 5th 5.00 4.60 4.42

42 Mina 5th 4.33 4.87 5.00

43 San Miguel 5th 4.33 4.87 4.83


20/63

20

Part 4

PRIORITY STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Table 20. Proposed Strategies on Administrative GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Strategies

Resource Allocation andUtilization

- The total appropriations whether annual or supplemental for personal services should not exceed the 55% personalservices ceiling;

- An amount should be set aside for the monitoring or surveillance of the magnitude of Acquired Immune DeficiencySyndrome or AIDS (RA 8504); and

- The Annual Executive Budget should be approved within the period, October 17 to Dec. 31.Local Legislation - The Legislative Agenda should be supportive of the Executive Agenda;

- The Legislative Agenda should be a product of research and/or consultations with stakeholders;- The tracking system should be computerized, and it should be capable of generating information on existing local rules

and regulations;

- The Sanggunian should enact a Gender and Development Code; and- Increase the percentage of ordinances over legislative measures.

Customer Service - Civil

Applications

- The LGU should have a database of civil registry records.Revenue Generation - The system on all local taxes, fees and charges should operate on a network that is in interlinked with computers in the

Offices of the Assessor, Business Permits and Licensing Officer and the Treasurer.- An incentive scheme should be provided to promote efficiency in real property assessment and real property tax

collection.

Development Planning - The LGU should establish a Geographic Information System (GIS).

Table 21. Proposed Strategies on Social GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Strategies

Peace, Security and

Disaster Risk

Management

- The Peace and Order Council (POC)should update the Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan which containsmeasures aimed at improving peace and order and public safety in the local government unit, monitor the implementation of

peace and order programs, and to address problems, if any, through action of its own or action of other competent authorities

made possible through an effective referral system, or undertake a periodic assessment of the prevailing peace and ordersituation in the local government unit;

- The Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan should be participatory in its formulation, and should include needs-basedpriority project(s) and financing;- The projects implemented by the POC during the year should be consistent with priority project(s) embodied in the IntegratedArea Community Public Safety Plan;

- The Local Council for the Protection of Children (LCPC) should meet as often as necessary, their every meeting should bedocumented and have an organized agenda, furthermore, the LCPC should be able to cause the approval of a legislation on

child survival, protection, participation and development, for the inclusion in the local annual appropriation funds, and is able

to assist children in need of special protection;- Ensure an annual financial allocation to the Katarungang Pambarangay to include financial benefits of the Lupon (e.g.,

allowances, insurance coverage, etc.), funding for the conduct of continuing education for the Lupon members, andappropriation to cover expenses for capital outlays (e.g., office fixtures, transportation service, etc.);

- The Katarangang Pambarangay should ensure that 98% to 100% of cases resolved were sustained or not repudiated;- The Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (DRRMC) should organize support groups and community

volunteers, and formulate an Operations Manual incorporating therein a communications strategy and monitoring and

evaluation.

Support to Education

Services

- Educational research for elementary and secondary education should be supported by the Special Education Fund;- Construction of extension classrooms should be extended by the LGU in support of education to be funded out of the General

Fund;

- On the Alternative Learning System, resources including staff and funds should be available, and target beneficiaries of thealternative learning system should be aware of the program.

Health Services - Basic dental or oral health care services should be made available (filling, extraction and cleaning, and proper oral health careinformation); and

- Conduct regular medical missions in partnership with a non-governmental organization or with the private sector.


21/63

21

Table 22. Proposed Strategies on Economic GovernancePriority Area for Improvement Strategies

Support to Fishery Services - The composition of the Fisheries and Resource Aquatic Council (FARMC) should be in accordance with Section75 of Republic Act No. 8550;

- FARMC meetings should be as often as necessary with organized agenda and proper documentation;- Mobilize the FARMC to assist in the preparation of the Fishery Development Plan, cause the enactment of a

fishery ordinance, and help enforce the fishery laws, rules and regulations on municipal waters;- Improve infrastructure support for the fishery sector, e.g., mariculture parks, fish ports, seaweeds village

ecozones, sea cages, among others;- Improve credit facilitation services to the fisherfolks (non-collateralized loans to poor fisherfolks, i.e. loan access,

insurance and credit guarantees through a cooperative);

- Extend adequate production support services, e.g. fingerlings;- Provide assistance to research and development services, e.g., assistance to research projects, techno-demo

cooperators, etc.;

- Improve market development services for the fishery sector i.e., trade fairs, exhibits, missions and congresses;- Increase the number of fishing-household benefiting from fishery extension and on-site research or facilities;- Encourage alternative and innovative assistance to fisherfolks.

Entrepreneurship, Business andIndustry Promotion

- Improve the quality of permitting or licensing. The processing of building permits should only require, at most, 5documentary requirements, 5 steps, and 5 signatories, and for the processing of occupancy permits it should

require, at most, 3 documentary requirements, 2 steps, and 5 signatories;

- Establish a One-Stop-Shop that will process various permits;- Strategize to effect the issuance of building and occupancy permits in less than 4 hours, and business permits in

less than 15 minutes;

- Provide, or cause the provision of, direct support services to business, particularly those categorized as micro,small and medium enterprises. Support services may come in the form of product labeling, product packagingand training of business-employed personnel.

Support to Agriculture Sector - Improve infrastructure support, e.g., irrigation system for irrigated or irrigable areas, post -harvest equipment,machines or facilities, feeder roads or farm-to-market roads, etc;

- Improve credit facilitation services to farmers (non-collateralized loans to poor farmers, i.e. loan access,insurance and credit guarantees through cooperatives or other financing institutions);

- Extend adequate production support, e.g., planting materials, fertilizers and other soil ameliorants, or laboratoryservices such as soil testing and similar services;

- Provide assistance to research and development, e.g., assistance to research projects, techno demo cooperators,etc.; and

- Provide market development services, e.g., trade fairs, exhibits, missions, congresses, etc.

Table 23. Proposed Strategies on Environmental GovernancePriority Area for Improvement Strategies

Freshwater EcosystemsManagement

- Freshwater protection or rehabilitation program integrated in the Comprehensive Development Plan; and- Rehabilitation and protection efforts should be deliberate - initiated and carefully planned by the LGU. Area

targets should be rehabilitated and protected.

Coastal Marine EcosystemsManagement

- Set target areas for rehabilitation and protection, and monitor actions to ensure the achievement of targets.Urban Ecosystems Management - Enforce pollution control measures

- Strengthen the Solid Waste Management Board- Ensure that every barangay has a material recovery facility- Improve solid waste collection practices- Move from Open Dumpsite Facility to Controlled Dumpsite Facility to a Sanitary Landfill as the final disposal

facility.

Table 23. Proposed Strategies on Valuing Fundamentals of GovernancePriority Area for

Improvement

Strategies

Financial

Accountability

- Relevant management tools such as manuals or guidelines should be available to key officials and personnel;- The responsibilities of accountable financial officers should be known and clear;- Sanctions for erring local government personnel regarding financial transactions should be clear and enforced;- Information about the procedure in transacting financially with the local government should be made available via various

media such as billboards, posters, bulletin boards, flyers, regular newsletters, internet or publications of the local government;- Monthly financial reports should be available;- Annual financial statements should be submitted within 60 days after the 31st of December and published in the local media;- Salaries and wages should be liquidated within 5 days after each 15 day or end of the month pay period;- Petty operating expenses and field operating expenses should be liquidated within 20 days after the end of the year subject t o

replenishment as frequently as necessary during the year;

- Official travels should be liquidated within 60 days after return to the Philippines (for foreign travel) or 30 days upon returnto permanent official station (for local travel).

Participation - More than 70% of LGU development projects especially those that are funded out of the 20% component of IRA should beimplemented in partnership with NGOs, POs and the private sector.


22/63

22

Attachment 1.1

LGU PROFILE

Basic Profile

Financial Profile

IRA Share: 44,319,828.00Local-Sourced Revenues: 11,192,026.95

Other Revenues: -Total LGU Income: 55,511,854.95

Economic Activity

Rank

1 Agricultural3 Fishery4 Industrial

2 Commercial and Service Centers

Contact Information

Name of Mayor Enrique M. RojasTelephone Number: (033) 329-66-22

Fax Number: (033) 329-55-66

E-mail Address: [email protected] Address: www.uswag-leganes.gov.ph

LGU Type: Municipality

Income Class: 4th

Population: 30,092Total Land Area (in has): 3,220.00

No. of Barangays: 18

No. of Households: 6,225


23/63

23

Attachment 1.2

VISION STATEMENT

The vision of the Municipality of Leganes will serve as a guide to which all plans,

programs, and projects of the municipality from the year 2012 to 2014 will be anchored. It setsthe desired role the municipality can play in the development of its wider region of which it is an

integral part, and the desired state of the municipality as a human habitat.

Thus we envision:

Leganes as the indispensable partner in the rapid economic

development of Metro Iloilo with god-loving, vigilant and

empowered citizenry living in an ecologically-balancedenvironment, enjoying a competitive and sustainable economy,

having adequate support facilities, under the stewardship of

transparent, proactive and dynamic leaders.


24/63

24

Attachment 1.3

RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS

1. Rich religious and cultural heritageThe San Vicente Ferrer Parish Church is a pilgrim destination in Western Visayas.

Devotees believe that their prayers will be answered through the intercession of the patron saint.

The church is famous for the palapak wherein the statue of San Vicente Ferrer is treaded on

ones head and believed to heal all sorts of ailments. The palapak is usually coupled by a saada

spiritual vow of sacrifice in exchange for the favors being asked. In April 4, 2008, Archbishop

Angel N. Lagdameo, Archbishop of Jaro, declared and proclaimed the Church of Saint Vincent

Ferrer as a diocesan shrine.

2. Rich agricultural land and availability of agricultural support facilitiesThe terrain of the municipality is characterized by level plains with a slope not exceeding

3%. The soil of the municipality can be classified in two categories: the Sta. Rita clay loam

variety, which covers 75%, and the Umingan fine sandy loam type which covers the rest of the

25%. The plains are of prime agricultural lands that produce rice, which is the municipalitysprime commodity. Of the total 2,065.28 hectares devoted for rice production, 82.07% are

irrigated. Surface water in Calaboa Creek, Carismo-an Creek and Janipa-an River are utilized for

such purpose. Post-harvest facilities are also available in majority of the barangays. The areasalong the coastline are swampy and a large portion of these swampy areas had been converted

into fishponds and salt-beds. The municipal government owns a 187 hectare fishpond that can be

utilized to generate jobs in the coastal area.

3. Rich coastal resourcesThe Municipality of Leganes is endowed with diverse and economically productive

coastal and marine resources. These resources if properly managed could sustainably contribute

towards food security. Various species of fish and mollusk such as sap-sap, lilang, asu-os,

gurayan, gonggong, balanak, pagi, gusaw, sumaral, talakitok, lapu-lapu, alimusan, bangus, lipis,liwit, lokus, lambiyaw, pasayan (shrimp), alimango (mud crab), kasag (blue crab).are abundant

in the coast of the municipality. Bivalves like green shells, bay-ad and litub are seasonally

bountiful.

Aquaculture and/or mariculture are prevalent in the coastal areas of the municipality. The

estimated area occupied by brackishwater ponds is 646 hectares distributed among Barangays

Bigke, MV Hechanova, Napnud, Gua-an and Nabitasan. Brackishwater fishponds are utilized forbangus, tilapia and shrimp production adopting traditional culture method. Target production is

from 300 kgs to 500 kgs per hectare per year.


25/63

25

Seaweeds and oyster culture are found along the watered area of Gui-gui Creek in

Barangay Nabitasan in a small scale production set-up. Approximately, 1 hectare of naturalgrown and planted mangrove thrive along the shorelines and estuarine of Barangay Camangay

and Bigke, almost 1 hectare naturally grown mangrove in Barangay Gua-an, and estimated 3

hectares mangrove cover that sporadically grown in a 10 hectare abandoned fishpond owned by

the Municipality, about 2 hectares of mangrove forest in the area previously occupied bySEAFDEC, 1 hectare fully grown mangroves that covers an islet at the delta of Jalaur River in

Barangay Nabitasan, and a 3 hectares mangrove covered area that protect the riverbank along

Jalaur River. Bungalon, pagatpat, bakhaw and nipa are the four dominant mangrove speciesfound in the Municipality.

A 2.50 hectares of sea grass cover was recently discovered by DOST divers about akilometer from the shore, within the territorial waters of Municipality. The Sea grass ecosystem

serves as habitat to many marine species where fish thrive and fed themselves on marine micro-

organism.

4.

Tourism prospect

Tourism is an increasingly visible and important sector in our local economy. It hassubstantial effects and vast linkages with other economic activities. It contributes to government

revenues; generate local employment and business opportunities. Recent efforts of the

municipality to reforest and conserve its mangrove areas with the support of non-governmentalorganizations have been successful in abating further degradation and preserve, if not restore

biodiversity in the coastal areas. The Jalaur river system also has a high potential for ecotourism

with its diverse fauna and thick nipa growths. Jointly, the two areas will be the springboard on

which the municipality can realign itself to become an ecotourism site in the Metro-Iloilo area.

5. Leganes Industrial Growth Center (LIGC)In 1998, the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), and the Regional

Development Council for Region VI (RDC VI) granted the green light for its development asthe growth corridor to the Pavia Regional Agro-industrial Center, which is also located in Metro

Iloilo. The Leganes IGC is positioned for medium and heavy industries, ship repair/building withwharf facilities.

Leganes occupies a strategic position in the trading route of Asia-Pacific countries. Thenatural geographic features of Leganes makes it one of the few locations in the country that can

be developed as a world class industrial center with contiguous deep water port in a well-

sheltered anchorage within the Iloilo Strait. The total reclamation area will be developed by

phases to restrain the impact of financial outlays. Phase 1, being the flagship of development,will be about 208 hectares including the 8 hectares wharf space. Phase 2 will be about 290

hectares; Phase 3 about 250 hectares and Phase 4 will be about 12 hectares, mostly for the

expansion of the wharf.

At the upper limit of the reclamation area, a 55-meter wide waterway canal shall be

constructed to serve as flood control and fishermens access to the sea. A box culvert of three -


26/63

26

barrel sections will be provided to connect the reclamation area to the mainland. From the LGU

standpoint of greater importance is the real income generated by the project and the resultingincome redistribution among income groups and among barangays in Leganes. Because of the

magnitude of the project and various social and economic activities horizontally and vertically

linked to it, its socio-economic impact is geographically far reaching, cutting across various

sectors and income groups. Consequently, livelihood opportunities, either as job openings forlaborers or via ancillary activities for those self-employed and entrepreneurs (whether individual

or community-based) is made available. Corollary to this, as laborers undergo skills

training/enhancement, value reorientation and community-based enterprises, they are affordedthe opportunity to undergo organizational strengthening and enterprise development, new

horizons are opened up which would enable themselves to have better control of their resources

and subsequently enable them to mainstream into the economy. The secondarybenefits/externalities of the project can be summarized as follows:

a. Increased family income of farmers/producers that supply the farm inputs needed bythe resource based industries;

b.

Increased family savings that will sustain livelihood development and generate fundsfor investments that will further improve their livelihood;

c. Improved productivity as a result of the ready market for farm produce, revenuesaccruing to the local and national in terms of real property taxes, tariffs, duties, fees

and licenses, import and export taxes;

d. Development of family level and barangay level entrepreneurship as backwardlinkages to locator industries. Concomitantly, the implementation of programs geared

to develop and strengthen cooperative-based undertakings in conjunction with

training and skills development/capability building programs are in conjunction with

the objective of empowering these groups with better and improved access andcontrol of resources required for their livelihood;

e. Considering the gender bias of some labor-intensive industries as electronics, whichare encouraged to locate in the economic zone, the womenfolk are provided

opportunities to be trained and to earn;f. Close backward linkage of the enterprises to the agricultural production activities will

ensure that small farmers and producers will benefit from the projects social impact

on small producers enhanced by the creation of wage and non-wage employmentopportunities based on improving productivity and expansion of market opportunities

for the agricultural-industrial sector; and

g. Value added to real estate within the influence area is expected to appreciatesignificantly as a result of the construction and operations of the Leganes IGC.

Landholders within the area of influence would realize windfall profits as a result of

marked increase in the value of their lands.


27/63

27

Attachment 1.4

POTENTIAL INVESTMENT AREAS

In May 14, 1997 the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA), under Resolution No.

97-144, approved the application of Leganes Industrial Growth Center (IGC), as specialeconomic zone, covering 177.6 hectares to be known as the Leganes Industrial Growth Center

Special Economic Zone. On February 4, 2008, the Municipality of Leganes was able to secure an

approval for the extension of the development timetable of the said economic zone.

The IGC is positioned for medium and heavy industries, ship repair and building with

wharf facilities. It can distribute goods easily to other parts of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao.

Leganes occupies a strategic position in the trading route of Asia-Pacific countries. The natural

geographic features of Leganes make it one of the few locations in the country that can bedeveloped as a world class industrial center with a contiguous deep water port in a well-sheltered

anchorage. It has a shallow foreshore that is technically feasible and economically viable forreclamation. Another boost to the investment potential of the municipality is the realization of

the proposed bridge that will connect Leganes to the island provinces of Guimaras and Negros.

Occidental.

In addition to the Leganes IGC, the Investment Incentives Code of the Municipality has

identified preferred areas of investment that will ultimately redound to the best interest of the

people. Hereunder are the preferred areas of investments:

1. Pioneering Enterprisea. Call Centersb. Electronics Productionc. Mallsd. Manufacture or Assembly of Agricultural Machineriese. Manufacture or Assembly of Motor Vehicles and Transportation Machineryf. Mass Communication and Entertainment Industryg. Printing and Publishing and Allied Industryh. Ship-building Industry

2. Manufacturing Enterprises Using Indigenous Materialsa. Aluminum Factoriesb. Candle Industryc. Ceramics Industryd. Chemical Factories Classified as Light Industry

Cosmetics and Perfumeries Industry Dry Ice Paints and similar products Soap and Toiletries-making Industries


28/63

28

e. Ethno botanicals and Organic Products Processing Plantf. Feed Millg. Furniture Industryh. Galvanized Iron Processing Plantsi. Glass Productionj.

Lumber Millsk. Paper Manufacturing

l. Pipe-making Industriesm. Shoe/Footwear Industryn. Tanning Factorieso. Textile Manufacturingp. Tile Productionq. Wall Board and Veneer Factoryr. Wine and Spirit Distillery

3. Tourist Accommodation Facilities and Attractionsa.

Convention Centersb. Fitness and Spa Centers

c. Hotels, Motels, and Pension Housesd. Inland Resort Developmente. Movie Houses and Theatersf. Recreational Facilities and Schoolsg. Religious Retreat Centersh. Souvenir Shopsi. Theme Park and Wildlife Sanctuaries

4. Service-Oriented/Consumer-Oriented Businessa. Bookstoresb. Bottling and Canning Plantsc. General Retailing Stores like Department Storesd. Cold Storage and Warehousinge. Electronics Repair Centerf. Funeral Parlor, Crematorium, and other similar facilitiesg. Gasoline and Service Stationsh. Hatcheryi. Home Appliance Storej. Ice Plantk. Irrigation Systeml. Motor Service Centerm. Pawnshopn. Photo-processingo. Power/Electrical Plantp. Security, Janitorial, and other similar servicesq. Short-term Educational Centers:

Arts School Dance School


29/63

29

Driving School Review Centers

r. Transportation Services (Taxi, Bus, Jeepney, etc.)s. Waste Management Systemt. Water Distribution Systemu. Water Treatment

5. Processing Plant Using Local Materialsa. Bakeryb. Beverage Processing Plantc. Fiber Processing Plantd. Fruit Processing Plante. Poultry and Fish Processing Plant

6. Common-carriersa. Cargo Forwardingb.

Dry-docking Servicesc. Inter-island Shipping

d. Terminal stations7. Institutional

a. Galleriesb. Librariesc. Private Academic Institutions including Vocational Schoolsd. Private Hospital/Lying-in Clinice. Religious Groups-owned Facilitiesf. Research Facilities

8. BOT Projectsa. Housing Projectsb. Other infrastructure facilities


30/63

30

Attachment 2.1

STATUS OF APPROPRIATIONS, ALLOTMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS

For Quarter Ending December 31, 2011

Function/Program Project/Activity Appropriations Obligation Unobligated Balance

Mayor's Office

Personal Services 2,247,459.00 2,236,136.28 11,322.72

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 1,147,040.21 990,771.59 156,268.62

Capital Outlay 10,000.00 - 10,000.00

Non-Office

Personal Services 956,689.11 956,689.11 -

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 3,220,329.83 3,065,386.97 154,942.86

Non-Office (Statutory Obligations) 2,476,248.00 477,699.75 1,998,548.25

Municipal Administrators Office

Personal Services 641,355.00 622,497.92 18,857.08

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 45,896.00 25,896.00 20,000.00

Capital Outlay 30,000.00 22,788.94 7,211.06

Office of the General Services

Personal Services 1,123,616.00 1,123,616.00 -


Sanggunuiang Bayan



Secretary to the Sangguniang Bayan

Personal Services 1,036,133.00 1,035,884.96 248.04


Capital Outlay 135,000.00 114,920.00 20,080.00

Human Resouce Management Office

Personal Services 382,553.00 382,549.12 3.88


Capital Outlay 40,000.00 30,500.00 9,500.00

Municipal Planning and Development Office



Municipal Engineering Office

Personal Services 1,135,887.00 1,132,404.60 3,482.40Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 53,976.00 38,811.75 15,164.25

Municipal Civil Registrar



Capital Outlay 30,000.00 28,480.00 1,520.00

Municipal Budget Office



Capital Outlay 30,000.00 29,920.00 80.00

Municipal Accounting Office



Capital Outlay 30,000.00 26,700.00 3,300.00

Municipal Treasurers Office

Personal Services 1,815,834.76 1,824,800.32 (8,965.56)

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses 355,000.00 354,753.90 246.10

Municipal Assessors OfficePersonal Services 1,194,667.00 1,187,662.92 7,004.08


Municipal Social Welfare and Development Office



Municipal Health Office



Municipal Agriculture Office




31/63

31

Sub-total 39,931,451.11 36,758,813.85 3,171,117.26

Function/Program Project/Activity Appropriations Obligation Unobligated Balance

Local Economic Development Office



Capital Outlay 2,827,142.00 2,803,345.25 23,796.75

Sub-total 7,599,271.00 7,363,122.65 236,148.35

TOTAL GENERAL FUND AND LEDO 47,530,722.11 44,121,936.50 3,407,265.61


32/63

32

Attachment 2.2

Statement of Income and ExpenditureFor the Year Ended December 31, 2011

Particulars Amount

Tax Revenue

Local Taxes

Professional Tax 14,678.00

Amusement Tax 14,850.00

Business Tax 1,635,623.16

Community Tax 525,788.84

Real Property Tax 1,743,236.43

Tax on Delivery Trucks and Vans 293,865.00

Fines and Penalties - Local Taxes 73,826.52

Sub-total 4,301,867.95

Permits and Licenses

Fees on Weights and Measures 1,825.00

Fishery Rental Fees 201,365.00

Franchising and Licensing Fees 37,740.00

Permit Fees 531,482.45Registration Fees 56,565.62

Other Permits and Licenses 28,534.80

Fines and Penalties - Permits and Licenses 6,482.05

Sub-total 863,994.92

Service Income

Clearance and Certification Fees 289,871.90

Garbage Fees 130,600.00

Inspection Fees 49,123.40

Sub-total 469,595.30

Business Income

Income from Cemetery Operations 189,470.25

Income from Markets 3,728,560.62

Income from Slaughterhouse 209,957.98

Landing and Parking Fees 41,600.00

Rent Income 344,795.34

Other Business Income 485,656.00

Sub-total 5,000,040.19

Other Income

Interest Income 24,192.66

Internal Revenue Allotment 44,651,552.00

Sub-total 44,675,744.66

TOTAL INCOME 55,311,243.02

Less: Expenses

Personal Services Expenses

Salaries and Wages - Regular Pay 18,139,268.88

PERA 2,775,336.36

ADCOM 1,000.00

Representation Allowance 1,005,300.00

Transportation Allowance 1,005,300.00

Clothing Allowance 464,000.00

Honoraria 6,000.00

Hazard Pay 16,811.86

Cash Gift 575,000.00

Year-end Bonus 1,509,420.18

Life and Retirement Insurance Contributions 2,170,247.05

PAG-IBIG Contributions 138,399.30

PHILHEALTH Contributions 216,801.51

ECC Contributions 122,956.98

Terminal Leave Benefits 230,377.68

Other Personnel Benefits 3,322,769.54

Sub-total 31,698,989.34


33/63

33

Particulars Amount

Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses

Travelling Expenses 633,390.06

Training and Seminar Expenses 267,805.00

Supplies and Materials Expenses

Office Supplies Expenses 395,792.80

Accountable Forms Expenses 59,979.30

Animal/Zoological Supplies Expenses 15,000.00

Food Supplies Expenses 52,144.00Drugs and Medicines Expenses 63,965.50

Medical, Dental and Laboratory Supplies Expenses 162,886.00

Gasoline, Oil and Lubricants Expenses 885,517.11

Agricultural Supplies Expenses 243,443.00

Other Supplies Expenses 57,245.25

Utility Expenses

Water Expenses 28,160.00

Electricity Expenses 1,539,474.21

Communication Equipment

Postage and Deliveries 2,660.00

Telephone Expenses - Landline 109,986.63

Internet Expenses 27,292.72

Membership Dues and Contribution to Organizations 64,900.00

Advertising Expenses 11,300.00

Printing and Binding Expenses 33,625.00

Rent Expenses 14,000.00

Representation Expenses 156,555.25

Transportation and Delivery Expenses 8,405.00

Subscription Expenses 3,243.15

Professional Services

Auditing Services 44,630.00

Consultancy Services 20,000.00

General Services 1,510,200.00

Janitorial Services 662,400.00

Security Services 64,500.00

Other Professional Services 24,000.00

Repairs and Maintenance

Power and Energy Structures 19,110.00

Buildings

R/M - Office Buildings 388,706.04

R/M - Hospitals and Health Centers 25,499.00R/M - Market and Slaughterhouse 13,000.00

R/M - Other Structures 805,151.50

Office Equipment, Furnitures and Fixtures

R/M - Office Equipment 294,355.00

R/M - Furniture and Fixtures 2,500.00

R/M - IT Equipment 23,445.00

R/M - Other Machinery and Equipment 27,400.00

Transportation Equipment

R/M - Motor Vehicles 272,729.00

Other Property, Plant and Equipment - Public Infrastructures

R/M - Roads, Highways and Bridges 204,068.00

R/M - Parks, Plaza and Monuments 319,067.00

R/M - Irrigation Canals and Laterals 277,730.00

R/M - Reforestation Upland 5,670.00

R/M - Reforestation Marshland 31,410.00

Confidential, Intelligence, Extraordinary and Miscellaneous ExpensesExtraordinary Expenses 58,850.00

Miscellaneous Expenses 7,342.72

Taxes, Insurance Premiums and Other Fees

Taxes, Duties and Licenses 3,989.67

Fidelity Bond Premiums 22,275.00

Insurance Expenses 309,007.80

Other Maintenance and Operating Expenses 4,564,295.58

Sub-total 14,838,101.29

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 46,537,090.63


34/63

34

Particulars Amount

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 8,774,152.39

Less: Financial Expenses

Bank Charges 13,300.00

Interest Expenses 1,186,372.03

Total 1,199,672.03

Income before Subsidies, Donations and Extraordinary Items 7,574,480.36

Less:

Subsidy to Government-owned/Controlled Group 285,840.00

Subsidy to Local Government Units 24,000.00

Subsidy to NGO's/PO's 23,610.00

Subsidy to National High School/Elementary 130,000.00

Donations 521,442.00

Total 984,892.00

NET INCOME 6,589,588.36


35/63

35

Attachment 2.3

Financial Performance Report

PY 2011

Revenue Generation

Interpretation Guide

Indicator: Cost to Collect Revenues Computation: (cost in collecting revenues/total local revenues collected) x 100 Significance: Determines local revenue collection efficiency Desired performance: Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type

and income class

Exceptional performance: Lower for both conditions: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless of income

class


36/63

36


Indicator: Locally-Sourced Revenues to Total Income Computation: (Amount of locally-sourced revenues/Total LGU Income) x 100 Significance: Determines local revenue collection effort and dependency from external

revenue sources, eq. IRA and other inter-governmental fund transfer

Desired performance: Locally-sourced revenues to total income should be higher than theaverage of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class

Exceptional performance: Locally-sourced revenues to total income should be higher thanthe: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)national average ofthe same LGU type regardless of income class


37/63

37


Indicator: Regular Revenues to Total Income Computation: [(Locally Sourced Revenues + IRA)/Total LGU Income] x 100 Significance: Describes reliability of funding sources Desired performance: Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type

and income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of income

class


Indicator: Locally-Sourced Revenue Level Computation: Amount of Locally-Sourced Revenue


38/63

38

Significance: Describes locally-sourced revenue gap between the LGU and average of LGUs(by LGU type and income class)

Desired performance: Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU typeand income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of incomeclass


Indicator: Locally-Sourced Revenue Per Capita Computation: (amount of locally-sourced revenue/population) Significance: Describes locally-sourced revenue per capita gap between your LGU and

average of LGUs


Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of income

class


39/63

39


Indicator: Real Property Tax (RPT) Accomplishment Rate Computation: (Amount of RPT collected/Amount of projected RPT collectibles) x 100 Significance: RPT is one of the major sources of income of LGUs in general. This indicator

determines local revenue collection effort on RPT.


Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2) national average of the same LGU type regardless of incomeclass

Resource Allocation and Utilization


40/63

40


Indicator: Personal Services Expenditure Ratio Computation: (Personnel services expenditures/Total expenditures) x 100

Significance: Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budgetallocation

Desired performance: Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budgetallocation LGU type and income class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated bylaw, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs - 45%, for 4th - 6th class LGUS - 55%.

Exceptional performance: Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUswith the same LGU type and income class, (2) lower than national average of LGUs with thesame LGU type regardless of income class, (3) Did not exceed the 45-55 ceiling for P.S.


Indicator: Total Expenditure Per Capita Computation: Total expenditures/population Significance: Describes how much was actually spent by the LGU in a per capita basis. Desired performance: Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type

and income class

Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the sameLGU type and income class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless of incomeclass.


41/63

41


Indicator: Debt Service Ratio Computation: Actual debt service cost/regular income Significance: Considers the proportion of actual debt service costs to total regular income. Desired performance: Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt

servicing limitation set for under LG Code of 1991.


42/63

42

Attachment 3.1

20% DEVELOPMENT FUND ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT SUMMARY

CY 2011

AIP Reference

Code

Name of Project Implementer Accomplishment

as to Indicator

Financial

Accomplishment

Average Total

Accomplishment

Status

2011-3000-200-1 Enhanced quality primary health caredelivery

MHO 66.67% 31.79% 49.23% Partiallyimplemented

2011-3000-200-2 Renovation of Leganes Main Health Centeras a Basic Emergency Obstetrics and

Newborn Care

MHO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-3000-200-3 Nutrition program MNC 79.41% 48.57% 63.99% Partially

implemented

2011-3000-400-1 Leganes malinong kag matawhay ka program(LMMK)

PNP 44.76% 0.00% 22.38% Unimplemented

2011-3000-400-2 Iwas sunog integrated program (ISIP) BFP 125.00% 99.83% 112.42% Completed

2011-3000-400-3 Leganes Pabahay sa mahirap program(LPMP) Phase I

MSWDO 0.00% 32.75% 16.38% Partiallyimplemented

2011-3000-400-4 Beautiful Leganes Program (Phase II) MEO 108.13% 91.34% 99.74% Completed

2011-3000-400-5 Completion of Saad Park (Phase III) MEO 100.00% 90.14% 95.07% Completed2011-3000-400-6 Sports development program MEO 100.00% 80.25% 90.13% Completed

2011-3000-500 Leganes integrated delivery of social services(LCIDSS)

MSWDO 96.00% 0.00% 48.00% Unimplemented

2011-8000-1 Upgrading of barangay roads into all-weatherroads (Phase I)

MEO 100.00% 58.42% 79.21% Partiallyimplemented

2011-8000-2 Jeepney/Bus bay (Phase I of II) MEO 0.00% 60.97% 30.49% Partiallyimplemented

2011-8000-3 Palay check demo MAO 85.24% 0.00% 42.62% Unimplemented

2011-8000-4 Gulayan sa Barangay MAO 72.22% 0.00% 36.11% Unimplemented

2011-8000-5 Livestock Support Program and Initiative MAO 124.44% 100.00% 112.22% Completed

2011-8000-6 Completion of the farmer's information and

technology system (FITS) Phase II of III

MEO 66.67% 33.33% 50.00% Partially

implemented

2011-8000-7 Solid waste management program MAO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-8000-8 Acquisition of lot for sanitary landfill MAO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-8000-9 Coastal resource management program MAO 77.78% 0.00% 38.89% Unimplemented2011-8000-10 Advancement of culture, arts and tourismprogram - Formulation of Medium-term

Tourism Master Plan

MTC 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-8000-11 Special program for the employment of

students

PESO 162.50% 100.00% 131.25% Completed

2011-1000-1 Improvement of Municipal Cemetery (Phase

II of II)

MEO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-1000-2 Tax enhancement program MTO 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Unimplemented

2011-1000-3 Enhancement of Wintax program MTO 35.00% 0.00% 17.50% Unimplemented

2011-1000-4 Integrated budget, revenue and expenditure

monitoring system (IBREAMS)

MTO 80.00% 48.70% 64.35% Partially

implemented

2011-1000-5 Installation of modernized communication

and recording systems (Phase I)

SB 120.00% 99.70% 109.85% Completed

2011-1000-6 Workplace improvement and renovations MEO 0.00% 12.41% 6.21% Partially

implemented

2011-1000-7 Codification Program SB 0.00% 24.32% 12.16% Partially

implemented

2011-1000-8 Updating of existing revenue code,

investment incentives code, and code ofgeneral ordinances

SB 33.33% 16.70% 25.02% Partially

implemented

2011-1000-9 Updating of CLUP (Phase I of II) MPDO 66.67% 20.16% 43.42% Partiallyimplemented

2011-1000-10 Establishment of bulletin board fortransparency

MEO 33.33% 0.00% 16.67% Unimplemented

2011-1000-11 Personnel career development and

enhancement program

HRMO 100.14% 82.22% 91.18% Completed

Total Average 20% Development Fund

Accomplishment Rate 58.67% 35.36% 47.01%


43/63

43

Attachment 3.2

1. Saad Park Completion


44/63

44

2. Rehabilitation of Gym


45/63

45


46/63

46


47/63

47

3. Rehabilitation of Fiesta Pavilion


48/63

48


49/63

49

4. Rehabilitation of Tennis Court


50/63

50

5. Mangrove Reforestation


51/63

51


52/63

52

6. Food Processing


53/63

53

7. Rice Production Projects


54/63

54


55/63

55

Attachment 4.1

LIST OF ORDINANCES APPROVED

CY 2011

OrdinanceNo.

Title DateApproved

2011-221 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING THE ENTIRE STRETCH OF VALENCIA STREET, THIS MUNICIPALITY WHILE

RENOVATION WORK IS UNDERGOING

FEBRUARY 8,

2011

2011-222 AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING THE AMOUNT OF FORTY EIGHT MILLION ONE HUNDRED FIFTY

FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED PESOS (PHP 48,155,900.00) AS ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR2011, SEVEN MILLION FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY SIX THOUSAND FIFTY FOUR PESOS (PHP 7,586,054.00)

AS LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE SAME FISCAL YEAR, ANDAMOUNT OF EIGHT MILLION TWO HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED EIGHT PESOS(PHP 8,212,308.00) AS 20% DEVELOPMENTAL FUND

FEBRUARY 8,

2011

2011-223 AN ORDINANCE CLOSING PORTION OF LEGANES BEACH ROAD FOR A PERIOD OF 15 DAYS EFFECTIVEMARCH 14, 2011

MARCH 8,2011

2011-224 AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING THE AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN THOUSAND FIVEHUNDRED THIRTY NINE AND 20/100 (P287,539.20) FROM THE OCCUPANCY RIGHTS HELD IN TRUST

REPRESENTING GOODWILL PAID BY THE LESSEES IN THE LEGANES COMMERCIAL COMPLEX TO FIRE

INSURANCE PREMIUM OF THE SAID ESTABLISHMENT

APRIL 12,2011

2011-225 AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING FEES FOR THE DIFFERENT SERVICES RENDERED BY THE MUNICIPALASSESSORS OFFICE, THIS MUNICIPALITY

APRIL 19,

2011

2011-226 AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING FEES FOR THE MEDICAL LABORATORY AND DENTAL SERVICES OF THERURAL HEALTH UNIT OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF LEGANES

MAY 24, 2011

2011-227 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE MANGROVE PROTECTED AREAS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OFLEGANES, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION, ANDPROVIDING PENALTIES IN VIOLATION THEREOF

AUGUST 9,2011

2011-228 AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET NO. 1 CY 2011 IN THE

AMOUNT OF TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY FOUR

PESOS ONLY (P2,172,194.00) TO COVER THE AMOUNT FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OTHEROPERATING EXPENDITURES OF THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CAPITAL OUTLAY FOR THE SAID

OFFICE, AND CAPITAL OUTLAY FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING

OFFICES TAKEN FROM THE UNDER ESTIMATED INTERNAL REVENUE ALLOTMENT (IRA) FROMJANUARY TO AUGUST 2011 IN THE AMOUNT OF TWO MILLION ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO

THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY FOUR PESOS ONLY (P2,172,195.00)

AUGUST 18,

2011

2011-229 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE AMOUNT OF THIRTY THOUSAND PESOS (P30,000.00) FOR THEPURCHASE OF SPORTS EQUIPMENTS TO BE USED IN PREPARATION FOR THE CDSA MEET

CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FUND (SDF) OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF

LEGANES, ILOILO

SEPTEMBER6, 2011

2011-230 AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET NO. 2 CY 2011 IN THETOTAL AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY NINE PESOS AND

FORTY TWO CENTAVOS ONLY (P290,429.42) TO COVER THE AMOUNT FOR THE PAYMENT OF JOB

HIRES UNDER THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL SERVICES

NOVEMBER8, 2011

2011-231 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-057, THE RABIES CONTROL ORDINANCE OF THE

MUNICIPALITY OF LEGANES, PROVINCE OF ILOILO

NOVEMBER

15, 2011

2011-232 AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET NO. 3 CY 2011 IN THETOTAL AMOUNT OF EIGHT HUNDRED FOURTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY ONE PESOSAND SEVENTY SIX CENTAVOS ONLY (P814,571.76) TO COVER THE PERSONAL SERVICES TERMINAL

LEAVE PAY, 20% DEVELOPMENT FUND AND 5% CALAMITY FUND

DECEMBER 6,2011

2011-233 ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE AND DISPOSAL OF PLASTIC BAGS, PLASTIC PACKING AND

OTHER PLASTIC PRODUCT MATERIALS

DECEMBER 6,

2011

2011-234 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REALIGNMENT OF ONE (1) UNIT PRINTER LQ-2180 TO OLYMPIA

TYPWRITER IN THE AMOUNT OF P 40,000.00 IN THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY TO THE SANGGUNIANG

BAYAN

DECEMBER 6,

2011

2011-235 AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REALIGNMENT OF SAVINGS ON THE CY 2011PERSONAL SERVICES BUDGET IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED FORTY

TWO THOUSAND TWENTY EIGHT PESOS AND 49/100 ONLY (P1,942,028.49) TO FUND AND IMPLEMENT

THE PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT INCENTIVE (PEI) AS AUTHORIZED UNDER BUDGET CIRCULARNO. 2011-4 DATED DECEMBER 5, 2011

DECEMBER20, 2011

2011-236 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR TO AUGMENT SAVINGS ON THE MOOEAMOUNTING TO P39,734.70 TO FUND EXPENDITURES OF THE SAME CLASS CY 2011 UNDER

MUNICIPAL TREASURERS OFFICE

DECEMBER27, 2011

2011-237 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR TO AUGMENT SAVINGS FROM OTHER

MOOE-BUDGET REVIEW TO OTHER MOOE-KAADLAWAN SANG LEGANES IN THE AMOUNT OF

TWENTY NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTEEN PESOS AND TWENTY FIVE CENTAVOS ONLY(25/100) (P29,215.25)

DECEMBER

27, 2011

2011-238 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDREDTHIRTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED PESOS ONLY (P113,900.00) TO COVER THE AMOUNT FOR THE

DECEMBER27, 2011


56/63

56

Ordinance

No.

Title Date

Approved

SANGGUNIANG KABATAN BASKETBALL LEAGUE EXPENSES AND SANGGUNIANG BAYAN CAPITALOUTLAY TO BE CHARGED AGAINST THE SAVINGS FROM THE BUDGET OF THE CDSA HOSTING AND

SANGGUNIANG BAYAN MOOE

2011-239 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MUNICIPAL VICE MAYOR TO AUGMENT SAVINGS FROM OFFICE

SUPPLIES AND TRAVELING EXPENSES TO OTHER MOOE IN THE AMOUNT OF TWENTY ONE

THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED PESOS ONLY (P21,100.000)

DECEMBER

27, 2011

2011-240 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR TO AUGMENT SAVINGS FROMCONFIDENTIAL EXPENSES TO OTHER MOOE IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS ONLY(P50,000.00)

DECEMBER27, 2011

2011-241 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDREDSEVENTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY THREE PESSOS AND 92/100 CENTAVOS ONLY

(P271,523.92) TO COVER ONLY THE AMOUNT OF P3,643.39 FOR ELECTRICITY EXPENSES, 54,304.43 FOR

20% DEVELOPMENT FUND, AND P13,567.10 FOR 5% CALAMITY FUND

DECEMBER27, 2011

2011-242 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR TO AUGMENT SAVINGS FROMMAINTENANCE AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY TO SOME OTHER ITEMS

OF THE SAME CLASS OF THE EXPENDITURES UNDER THE LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE

IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND SEVEEN HUNDRED TWELVE PESOSONLY (216,712.00)

DECEMBER29 2011


57/63

57

Attachment 4.2

LIST OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVED

CY 2011

Resolution

No.

Title Date

Approved

2011-001 A RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE TO THE FAMILY OF THE LATE FORMER PUNONG BARANGAYFLORITO SUPERAL PUDADERA, SR. OF BARANGAY NABITASAN, LEGANES, ILOILO

JANUARY 12,2011

2011-002 A RESOLUTION DECLARING ALL COMMITTEES POSITIONS VACANT AND OPEN JANUARY 12,2011

2011-004 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO STOP THE OPERATION OF A JUNKSHOP

AT THE BOUNDARY OF BARANGAY CAGAMUTAN SUR AND BARANGAY CAGAMUTAN NORTE

BESIDE THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY

FEBRUARY 1,

2011

2011-005 A RESOLUTION DECLARING ALL POSITIONS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEES VACANT AND OPEN FEBRUARY 1,2011

2011-006 A RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE LEGANES PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE (PNP) PERSONNEL AND

THE SWAT TEAM OF THE ILOILO PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICE, ILOILO, FOR THE JOB WELL DONE IN

THE ARREST OF RETIRED PHILIPPINE ARMY MASTER SERGEANT ROBERTO HISANAN OF BARANGAYSAN VICENTE, LEGANES, ILOILO

FEBRUARY

22, 2011

2011-007 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION OF THEPROGRAMMATIC MANAGEMENT OF DRUG RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS (PMDRT)

FEBRUARY22, 2011

2011-008 RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE LOCAL HEALTH BOARD RESOLUTION NO.1 SERIES OF 2011, ASKING

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM SENATOR FERDINAND BONGBONGMARCOS, JR. AMOUNTING TO

THREE MILLION (P3,000,000.00) FOR THE TOTAL RENOVATION OF THE LEGANES RURAL HEALTH UNITWHICH INCLUDES COMPLETE FACILITIES, A DENTAL CHAIR FOR DENTAL DEPARTMENT AND

REHABILITATION OF LABORATORY DEPARTMENT

FEBRUARY

22, 2011

2011-009 A RESOLUTION FIXING RATE FOR THE RENTAL OF THE OPEN SPACE AT THE 2ND FLOOR OF THELEGANES COMMERCIAL COMPLEX (LCC), THIS MUNICIPALITY IN GIVING THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

THE AUTHORITY TO SIGN THE LEASE CONTRACT WITH THE LESSEE

FEBRUARY22, 2011

2011-010 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR SIMPLE SUBDIVISION PROJECT (SSP) OF MR.

ENRIQUE JAGUNAP LOCATED AT BRGY. GUIHAMAN, LEGANES, ILOILO WITH AN AREA OF 2,396SQUARE METERS CONTAINING SEVEN (7) LOTS WITH T

annual report for the year ended 2011

Documents